Air New Zealand Limited (AIR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 27, 2026

NZSE NZ Industrials Passenger Airlines earnings 62 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Welcome to Air New Zealand 2026 Annual Results Investor Briefing. [Operator Instructions] And with that, I will turn the call over to Andrew Fenton, General Manager, Corporate Finance. Please go ahead.

Unknown Executive

executive
#2

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for Air New Zealand's 2026 Annual Results Presentation. Today's presentation is being webcast and recorded and a copy of the presentation and associated materials are available on our Investor Center website. Just a reminder that our comments today will include certain forward-looking statements regarding our future expectations, which may differ from actual results. We ask that you read through the disclaimer and in particular, the forward-looking cautionary statement provided on Slide 2 of the presentation. Joining us today are our Chief Executive Officer, Nikhil Ravishankar; our outgoing CFO, Richard Thompson; and our new CFO, Kris Cudmore. We'll begin with an overview of the year and the progress we've made since outlining our strategy reset in June. We'll then take you through the financial performance in more detail before finishing with the outlook for 2027. Following the presentation, we'll open the line for questions. With that, I'll hand over to Nikhil.

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#3

Kia ora, everyone, and thank you for joining us. When I took on the Chief Executive role late last year, I set 5 immediate priorities for the business. First, improving operational reliability and punctuality. Second, getting grounded aircraft and engines back into service as quickly as possible. Third, accelerating the cost improvement the business needed alongside resetting our executive portfolios and organizational structure; fourth, developing a new strategy and aligning our operating model behind it. And fifth, stepping up our advocacy for a fair, affordable and future-focused aviation system for New Zealanders. We have made significant progress against each of those priorities, but recognize that progress needs to translate into stronger financial performance. Financially, FY '26 was a very difficult year. Our financial performance was significantly and adversely impacted by high fuel prices. This came on top of the ongoing impact of engine availability issues and maintenance and aviation system cost pressures. We're not satisfied with that outcome, and our retention is firmly on improving it. First, the operational performance of the airline in terms of reliability and punctuality improved significantly throughout the year with on-time performance in the top decile amongst global comparable airlines. This is the result of an extraordinary effort from Air New Zealanders across the business. Second, our team has worked relentlessly with Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney to return grounded aircraft to service earlier than expected, and aircraft availability improved by the end of the financial year. There are still residual risks and costs to work through, but we entered 2027 in a considerably more reliable fleet position than we had in the last 2 to 3 years. Third, we continue to make progress on the things we can control and are accelerating the cost improvement at pace. We have delivered $94 million of incremental transformation benefits during the year, and we now have identified an additional $135 million of annualized savings, including both direct and indirect costs which will accrue from the 2027 financial year to improve our overall cost base and offset expected inflation. This is an increase from the $100 million identified annualized cost savings previously announced in May, and this work is ongoing. And fourth, we reset our strategy around 3 strategic pillars: customer first, targeted growth and resilient and future fit, to deliver sustainable returns to shareholders over time. The fifth will be a longer journey, but we continue to advocate for an affordable aviation system for all at New Zealanders. New Zealand aviation costs have risen at more than twice the rate of inflation since 2019. Air New Zealand and our customers' share of these aviation system costs across New Zealand and the offshore ports we fly to was $1.2 billion in 2026, a price increase of $142 million on 2025. 2026 was difficult financially, but it was also a year in which we've rebuilt our fleet, materially improved our operations and reset our strategy. Moving to Slide 6, and I'll provide a financial year 2026 review across key categories. Our financial performance the key impact on the result in our revenue drivers, operational improvements and loyalty and safety. We recorded a loss before tax of $336 million compared with earnings before tax of $164 million in the prior year and slightly better than the guidance range provided to the market in May 2026. Approximately $465 million of the profit before tax impact came from 3 areas, namely the ongoing global engine availability issues which had an impact net of compensation of approximately $190 million, fuel price, which had an adverse impact of $135 million in the year. From an initial fuel price impact of $328 million, our hedging protection recovered $123 million of this cost increase and through adjusting capacity and fares in response we've been able to mitigate about 1/3 of this post-hedged fuel impact, and an increase of $139 million in maintenance costs, excluding FX, driven by additional life cycle maintenance and maintenance costs on leased engines. Richard will go through each of these in more detail shortly. We carried around the same number of passengers as last year at 16 million passengers, while passenger revenue increased 4.8% to $6.1 billion, while [ RASK ] increased 3.4% and it was not enough to cover the significant increase in fuel cost with about 30% of increased fuel price recovered through mitigating capacity and fair activities from March through to June. Given the price sensitivity of air travel, airlines globally have not been able to recover the full increase in fuel costs. We took quick and decisive action through fair adjustments and capacity reductions to balance affordability for customers and maximize recovery and will continue to do so. Capacity increased 1.3%. And while above prior year, second half capacity was about 5% below our original plan as we adjusted to the sharp increase in the jet fuel price for March. Thanks to a range of initiatives we're putting in place and our team's dedication, our customer and operational metrics continue to move in the right direction. Our on-time performance increased to 84% in the second half of the year, up from 77.5% in 2025 and in the global top decile amongst comparable airlines. Our rebranded [indiscernible] loyalty program and the new multi-tier membership are resonating well with our customers with 5.4 million loyalty members, up 8.3% on 2025. Safety will always be our utmost priority. We are proud to be awarded airlineratings.com 7-star plus safety rating in 2026. Moving to Slide 7 and the step change of what the return of grounded aircraft means to the airline. At the peak of the engine disruption, 5 of our 14 Boeing 787s and 6 of our Airbus A320 and A321neo aircraft were grounded, almost 20% of our total jet fleet. This created disruptions for our customers, operational complexity and significant financial cost. We carried the fixed cost of aircraft, people, infrastructure and systems, and we incurred additional costs through leased aircraft and engines to protect the network and schedule. We missed out on the cost per seat efficiency of these newer aircraft types, which are about 10% to 20% lower than the older generation aircraft despite incurring the cost of owning these new aircraft. While we received some of the compensation from engine partners, this was not enough to offset the financial costs incurred. Today, the picture is very different. The last 787 was returned from long-term storage in June, an incredible milestone and a huge thank you to our teams around the business who [ perciviate ] to make this happen sooner than expected. And on the narrow-body fleet, we expect the last of these to return to service during calendar year 2027. There are still residual risks to availability through 2027, and we're still carrying the cost of temporary leased aircraft and engines in the system. It takes time to bring returning aircraft fully into the selling and operating schedule. We are in continuous discussions with both Rolls-Royce and Pratt & Whitney on extending compensation. While risk remains the fundamental point is that the fleet constraint, which has shaped this airline over the last 3 years is materially reducing and the airline enters 2027 in a considerably more reliable fleet position. This gives us more options around capacity, network deployment and operating efficiency. When we announced our future in June, we set out 3 strategic priorities: first, customer first providing safe, reliable and punctual service for our customers, delivering unique key service and innovative products and increasing customer reach and sales with smarter, more relevant offers. We're expanding on our operational and resilience driven review of clean sheet scheduling onto our [ transtasman ] Pacific and long-haul networks to further improve reliability and punctuality. We're investing in our service proposition and lounges grounded in our unique Kiwi hospitality, improving disruption management and continuing to modernize the way we market to customers and how they buy from and interact with Air New Zealand. Second, targeted growth, targeting profitable network growth, transforming our loyalty program in line with industry-leading practice and diversifying our revenue streams. This includes inbound premium leisure on our long-haul markets with new 787 and A321neo aircraft that are fit for mission, strengthening our hub and alliance network growing our SME corporate and enterprise position, particularly on regional and domestic networks, transforming loyalty and expanding flight adjacent revenue. And third, resilient and future fit. That means removing cost and complexity, improving labor productivity, transforming engineering and maintenance, developing a financially sustainable regional network unwinding the temporary inefficiencies created by fleet disruption and delivering on our capital management metrics. We are well underway with our ongoing transformation program. alongside work to build a financially sustainable regional network and deliver against our capital management metrics. On to Slide 9 and pleasingly, the customer-first strategic initiatives we are putting in place are already delivering benefits for our customers. Before a customer experiences a new seat, a lounge or a digital feature, they need to trust us to get them where they need to be safely, reliably and on time. Our on-time performance increased from 77.5% in 2025 to 84% in the second half of 2026. Customer satisfaction increased from 83.6% to 84.5% and controllable cancellations reduced from 2.2% to 1.3%. These are very significant improvements and have been the result of a detailed operational and resilience driven review of our schedule that included a focused program of initiatives across our team and the rollout of new digital tooling in support of operational communication and decision-making. We continue to invest in this area with the goal of being 1 of the top 5 airlines in the world for reliable and punctual operations. We have retrofitted 9 out of 14 of our Boeing 787 fleet, and the new interior product is resonating very well with our customers. The remaining 787 fleet fit out will be completed by November this year, slightly ahead of schedule. Finally, our automated passenger rebooking technology is transforming how we reaccommodate passengers when disruptions do occur, taking most rebookings from hours to under 20 minutes, even on our largest aircraft. Customers get certainty and control over their journey much sooner, enabling our people to focus on complex journeys and those who need extra care. There is more to do but the direction of travel is encouraging, and our customers are noticing. The demand picture across the network was mixed, but we're seeing solid inbound volumes continuing the trend of 2025 and the first half of 2026. Across Asia, overall passenger growth was flat, but with higher inbound passenger volumes. Premium cabin mix and revenue growth was particularly strong in the fourth quarter. Passenger capacity and cargo volumes were impacted in the second half of the year, and we manage capacity in [ RASK ] to mitigate the surges in fuel price. North America also delivered flat inbound volumes, although outbound New Zealand sales remained softer, in part reflecting the weak New Zealand dollar. Capacity held flat during the year, up 1% but was lower than planned for the second half and with softer yield and RASK recovery. Tasman and Pacific Island passenger volumes grew, mainly supported by strong inbound volumes out of Australia. Domestic demand remains challenging. Passenger demand was down and the New Zealand economy remained soft. We have been disciplined in matching capacity to demand and where appropriate, using yield to respond to the higher fuel environment. More generally, we continue to see encouraging trends in product and cabin mix with premium cabin revenue increasing by 14% and ancillary revenue by 12%. In 2026, we delivered transformation initiatives, generating an incremental $94 million of EBITDA benefits in 2026 against 2025. That has come from a broad range of initiatives. Next-generation revenue management is now operating across the network, and we have increased direct ancillary buy-ups. We've improved contact center efficiency, including through AI-powered live chat. We've replatformed and rebranded our loyalty program to Core, renewing our successful long-standing strategic partnership with Westpac, continuing to deliver great value to our customers and providing ways to accelerate their core rewards through banking. And we have introduced automated disrupt rebooking and improved cargo revenue management. We're building on this program of work under our future, which applies a sharper lens around customer first, profitable growth, cost and capital. Before I hand over to Richard Thompson, who will run through the financials, I'd like to take a moment to thank him for his nearly 6 years at the helm as Chief Financial Officer. Richard was instrumental during the airlines post COVID recovery, managing the recapitalization of the airline, the response to the various fleet availability challenges and most recently, a response to the fuel crisis. Richard, you are deeply respected across the company and will be truly missed.

Unknown Executive

executive
#4

Thanks, Nikhil, and good morning, everyone. I'll start with the financial summary on Slide 13 before talking to the major movements in the result. Operating revenue increased 3.9% to $7 billion, with revenue up 4.8% to $6.1 billion. Cargo revenue was broadly flat at $484 million. RASK increased 3.4% for the full year but part of this reflected the impact of the Middle Eastern conflict on fuel prices and in turn, the capacity and airfare responses in the second half. These actions were not enough to recover the 31% increase in fuel cost in the second half versus the second half of 2025. The significant increase in costs, including fuel the cost of engine availability issues, increased maintenance costs and aviation system costs, all materially impacted the bottom line. Despite the loss before taxation of $336 million for the year, operating cash flow remained positive at $819 million compared with the $940 million in the prior year, with cash flow in the second half of the year boosted by improved transportation sales in advance. We finished the year with $1.6 billion of liquidity, slightly above our target range of $1.2 billion to $1.5 billion. Net debt-to-EBITDA increased to 3.8x higher than our target ratio of between 1.5x and 2.5x, reflecting a combination of lower EBITDA $511 million in 2026 compared to $939 million in 2025 and higher net debt compared to the prior year due to increased capital expenditure, particularly in the first half. I'll talk about net debt in more detail shortly. And consistent with our capital management framework, no final dividend has been declared. The waterfall graph on Slide 14 shows the biggest impact on this year's result compared to 2025. Revenue and other income were better overall, including the benefit of higher RASK, but this really only increased in the second half of the financial year as we manage capacity and fears in response to the higher fuel price environment. This was partially offset by $39 million less in engine-related compensation in 2026 within other income. However, the overall increase in revenue was more than offset by significant increases in fuel, engine availability, maintenance and aviation system costs, and I'll go through each of these in turn on the next few slides. But as you can see from the graph, fuel price was the single biggest impact. Nonfuel costs experienced modest general price inflation, but as discussed earlier in the year, aviation system costs increased at a much faster rate. The transformation benefits Nikhil discussed are already included in these numbers. Without them, the result would clearly have been weaker still. Slide 15 details the 3 major transitory impacts on 2026. And which we expect to unwind progressively in the coming years. Together, the impact of engine delay issues, the Middle Eastern conflict and fuel crisis and increased maintenance costs had an adverse impact on earnings of approximately $465 million. We estimate that the engine delay issues contributed approximately $190 million of that additional cost, net of compensation compared to $165 million in the prior year. We expect a financial impact of between $70 million and $90 million in 2027, from a combination of continuing lease commitments related to engine issues and available aircraft not able to be fully utilized [indiscernible] fuel crisis. The Middle East crisis increased our fuel bill by approximately $328 million compared to what we expected going into the second half and by $205 million after the benefits of fuel price hedging. We reacted quickly and decisively adjusting capacity and fares and response, mitigating about 1/3 or $70 million of that impact. resulting in an estimated net impact of $135 million on the pretax result compared to expectations. As indicated this time last year, 2026 was a higher-than-normal year for aircraft maintenance. The cost increase of $139 million, excluding FX, was attributable to increased activity the timing of life cycle maintenance events and additional maintenance on leased engines in particular. We expect aircraft maintenance costs to be between $50 million and $100 million lower in 2027 than in 2026. The fourth impact during the year in one area that is concerningly not unwinding is aviation system cost inflation. While price inflation is moderating across most line items, the cost of operating within the New Zealand aviation system continues to increase materially faster than general inflation. In New Zealand and our customers share of these aviation system charges across New Zealand and the offshore ports we fly to, was $1.2 billion, a price increase of $142 million on 2025. Of this amount, approximately $720 million was recognized as a cost in our own financial statements, a price increase of approximately $83 million in 2026 compared to 2025. [indiscernible] aviation system cost inflation was approximately 14% for the year, compared to all other nonfuel cost inflation of around 3%. In particular, price-driven CAA safety and [ FSC security Levies ] increased by more than 90% in the current financial year. While CAA and [indiscernible] will not keep increasing at the same rate in 2027, landing charges are expected to continue increasing well ahead of CPI with some airport charges expected to increase by upwards of 10% during the 2027 financial year. We continue to advocate for an affordable and efficient domestic aviation system and pricing structure in New Zealand. Moving to Slide 17 and looking at these costs in more detail on a unit cost basis. The adverse pressures I've just mentioned are visible and all unit costs. Overall, reported CASK increased 10.4% compared to a RASK increase of only 3.4%. A significant component of the CASK increase was fuel price, which contributed [ $0.52 per ASK ]. Underlying CASK, excluding fuel and foreign exchange, increased 4.8%. The increased maintenance activity I just discussed represented roughly 1/5 or $0.32 per ASK of the increase and aviation system costs represented much of the balance. This is why restoring aircraft utilization matters so much, scale economies matter. As the fleet availability normalizes, we can restore scale, remove temporary lease and engine costs simplify the operation and spread the fixed cost base across more productive capacity. Turning now to Slide 18 and looking at net debt. Net debt increased materially in the first half of the financial year from $1.1 billion at 30 June 2025 to just under $2 billion at 31 December 2025. You can see from the graph that this was as planned and driven by a step-up in capital expenditure on aircraft, aircraft interior retrofits and capitalized engine maintenance. Operating cash flow was solid in the second half despite the reported P&L loss. While EBITDA was soft, we have seen forward bookings strengthen since late May, increasing sales and advance. As a result, we ended the second half with net debt at approximately $1.9 billion, slightly less than at the half year. Our leverage metrics are clearly above the target range, and the Board and management are committed to restoring our capital management metrics. The key driver will be returning near line to profitability and improving EBITDA. That reinforces the approach we are taking to aircraft deliveries and capital allocation. We will continue to adjust investment with demand, returns, balance sheet capacity and operational readiness. With that, I will hand you over to Kris Cudmore, the airline's new CFO and Nikhil for some closing comments on the outlook.

Kris Cudmore

executive
#5

Thank you very much, Richard. First, I'll discuss our future fleet investment profile, our capacity expectations, fuel and FX hedging then financial outlook before handing back to Nikhil for closing remarks. Turning to Slide 20, fleet investment. The key decision we have taken is to smooth the aircraft investment profile in the near term and to bring it down medium term. The delivery profile of the new Gen X powered 787s has been fluid for some time. Following the most recent delays of 2 of these 787s from earlier this year to later this year and a quicker-than-expected return of grounded wide-body aircraft. We are in active negotiations with Boeing to rephase the delivery profile to smooth capital investment and realign fleet deliveries with our targeted capacity growth. We want the right aircraft, but we also want them at the right time. The program also includes completion of the remaining Boeing 787 retrofit by the end of calendar year 2026 and the commencement of the 777-300 ER cabin refresh in early 2027. The remaining investment across those 2 cabin programs is approximately $200 million over the next 2 years. In the 2027 financial year, we expect to see incremental depreciation of between $110 million to $130 million compared to 2026. And this is also subject to our Boeing negotiations. Turning to Slide 21, capacity outlook. Our 2026 capacity was approximately 10% below pre covered levels. But as aircraft return and new aircraft arrive, capacity begins to recover in 2027. We currently expect group capacity to increase between 2% and 4% year-on-year. Domestic capacity is expected to be broadly flat year-on-year with the first half affected by fuel-related reductions, balanced with the expected delivery of 2 A321s later in the financial year. Tasman and Pacific Island capacity is expected to increase between 3% and 5% with the increase in wide-body aircraft availability and supported by new route development, particularly Christchurch to Perth and Auckland to Western Sydney. International long-haul flying is expected to increase around 2% to 4%. This reflects returning wide-body aircraft and new 787 deliveries, offset by completion of the retrofit program and the lower levels of profitable utilization due to the fuel crisis. Some additional capacity will be deployed into new services, including [indiscernible] to Tokyo and to Singapore. This new lower-cost Christchurch hub option for New Zealand is something we're very excited about. Now on Slide 22, fuel and FX. Fuel remains the single largest area of uncertainty in the outlook. Our hedging program provides some nearer-term protection, but it is far from a complete solution. As of 14th of August, approximately 80% of our estimated '27 first half fuel volume was hedged on Brent crude and 38% for the second half of '27, across the full year that represents approximately 60% of expected volumes. Similar to many airlines, we have traditionally hedged almost entirely through Brent crude instruments, but now we have an overlay of approximately 20% of crack spread swaps to help partially manage basis risk in the first half. The chart illustrates the sensitivity of our total fuel costs to changes in Singapore jet fuel prices. assuming an average jet fuel price of USD 130 per barrel, our 2027 fuel cost would be approximately NZD 2.1 billion. Foreign exchange is also partially hedged, particularly our U.S. dollar exposure, and we are 60% hedged for the 2027 financial year at USD 0.59. Now turning to Slide 23 for our outlook. Prior to the Middle East conflict, the airline expected in its central case to return to profitability in the 2027 financial year, reflecting the underlying improvements in the business. Given the continued uncertainty surrounding the conflict, the volatility of jet fuel prices and with jet fuel currently in the region of $140 to $150 per barrel. The airline is not in a position to provide earnings guidance for the 2027 financial year at this time. Beyond fuel, the major factors that impacted the 2026 financial result are expected to continue to have some impact in the '27 financial year, albeit to a lesser extent. Disruption from engine availability is reducing substantially as aircraft return to service. However, there remains an estimated financial impact of between $70 million to $90 million in '27 for a combination of continuing lease commitments related to engine issues and available aircraft not able to be fully utilized due to the fuel prices. We expect maintenance costs to be $50 million to $100 million lower in 2027 than in 2026. The Aviation system costs continue to rise well above inflation, with airport charges expected to increase by upwards of 10% at some ports during the 2027 financial year. The airline expects the 2027 financial year to be both a transition and a recovery year with operational performance continuing to improve even as elevated fuel prices weigh on profitability. We also expect the range of initiatives we have implemented in response to the currently elevated fuel cost will contribute to offsetting a larger portion of the elevated cost of fuel compared to the prior year. And with that, I'll now hand back to Nikhil to close the call.

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#6

Thank you, Kris. This has been another demanding year for Air New Zealand, and our people have continued to rise to the challenges we have faced. I'm incredibly proud of the commitment, professionalism and care they have shown for our customers and for each other. There is more work ahead, but we enter the new financial year with a clear strategy, a strong operation and confidence in the future of Air New Zealand. We're seeing encouraging inbound demand with strong forward bookings into New Zealand. This is a positive signal for tourism and for the country more broadly, and it is pleasing to see the work we've been doing to stimulate demand in our key international markets contributing to that momentum. New Zealand remains a highly desirable destination and our investment in our onboard product and unique kiwi service and hospitality puts Air New Zealand in a strong position to bring more international visitors to our shores. Our customers remain at the heart of everything we do. We will continue to work hard to maintain and improve our operational performance while delivering the exceptional product and service experience our customers expect from Air New Zealand. We have one of the most valuable brands in New Zealand. We have the strongest loyalty program. We consistently ranked one of New Zealand's most attractive employers and we are back to commanding strong customer preference. We remain focused on executing our strategic priorities, improving financial performance and positioning the airline for long-term sustainable returns. Thank you. With that, we'll open the line for questions.

Operator

operator
#7

[Operator Instructions] First, we have Andy Bowley from Forsyth Barr.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#8

A few questions from me. The first of which I -- just curious around Slides 22 and 21 in the [indiscernible] around the overall fuel cost guidance, I guess, a $2.1 billion and then the capacity growth that we're anticipating in 2027. And the question really revolves around -- I think, Kris, you had the comment that in the first half, domestic we'll see fuel-related reductions. And I'd imagine that there's other fuel-related reductions across the capacity backdrop, particularly for the first half. But I guess the question is, are the 2 slides consistent is that capacity backdrop that we're anticipating for 2027 predicated on the $2.1 billion in terms of fuel costs.

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#9

[indiscernible].

Kris Cudmore

executive
#10

Thanks, Nikhil. And yes, I mean, it should be. We are taking down capacity versus what we would have done because of the fuel crisis. So yes, I mean we're continuing to evaluate that as you expect. It's sort of -- it's not something that changes on a dime. We reviewed the Northern winter schedule this morning. And we're in the middle of reviewing the Northern summer schedule with an initial view today. So what we've given you is as close to hot off the price as we can.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#11

And in terms of then splitting that between first and the second half for 2027, can we assume that the plus 2% to plus 4% for group is going to be lower in the first half?

Unknown Executive

executive
#12

Andy, Richard here. I think the slightly lower in the first half than the second half. All I am conscious of the fact that we've got a number of these new long-haul routes launching in Northern Winter. And so we'll see pretty constrained capacity from now through to end of October, mid-November, December, we're flying quite a bit more. And we've sort of kicked our powder dry, I endorse the comments Kris has made. We'll see where the fuel crisis is heading -- and to Kris's point, sort of evaluate reevaluate what we're operating, if need be in the fourth financial quarter of the year, probably later in the first half. But at the same -- for the purposes of your modeling assumptions, it's sort of a 50-50 split really between the first and second half.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#13

Great. And maybe just on fuel, I recognize that the fuel crisis is only kind of 6 months in or so. But how are you thinking about fuel cost in a strategic sense? What is normalized from a cost point of view within the wider business model, what's that business model predicated on? And I guess, how do you -- so far, we've see technical or tactical changes to date, but at what stage do you anticipate that they would become structural or what would need to change for those to become structural within the business?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#14

Yes. Thanks, Andy. I think -- it's worth thinking about it this way. This is sort of how it's playing out, and we don't have years of data, of course. But in real time, when there is a fuel price spike, the amount of fuel price that we can recover in the first instance is teeters around sort of the 20% to 30% mark. And the longer that fuel price stays there, i.e., there is a degree of stability, then our ability to recover more increases and shifts either in fuel price in either direction means that cycle starts all over again. We are looking at calibrating the operations for fuel price somewhere between $120 and $160 and the measures we are taking though tactical balancing, maximizing recovery with demand elasticity. But we're also thinking about what we would have to do if the fuel price went north of that, say, north of $160, $170. Of course, it's hard to tell what fuel price is going to do at any point in time. But what's encouraging to see is the approach that we are taking is consistent with what's happening around the world. And we are recovering fuel price at the same levels as what we're seeing others managed to recover in their respective markets. If you think of fuel price recovery at this moment, we're recovering anywhere between 40% to 60% of the current fuel price. And as I said, as those fluctuate, the recovery rates fluctuate with it.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#15

That's helpful. But maybe on that $120 million to $160 million level that you're calibrating the business for, can you be profitable with fuel prices even as high as that $120 million?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#16

We're in a situation now where if that were to persist, there are actions that we can take to get to profitability at those levels. But for everyone's sake, we're, of course, hoping that fuel price returns back to some semblance of normal.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#17

And by that, do I take that you mean there needs to be some further structural changes in the business to be able to [indiscernible] that?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#18

Too early to say Andy. We're working through it. if there are -- if fuel prices remain elevated, then we do have to look at the capacity lever quite seriously, and we are. Sorry, Chris, do you want to add.

Kris Cudmore

executive
#19

Yes. Thanks, Nikhil, I think it's sort of a shape and valving, Andy. So if the market was to stay at [ 120 ] for all time from here, I think did the market just adapts and we'd be profitable again as quickly as you'd expect us to be profitable given the other things that are going on in the business. It's the upwards of all in particular, that hurts us, as you know. At fuel prices of [ 200 ] or more, you've got a different situation, but we're nowhere near that at the moment, thankfully. So yes, we'll continue to adapt.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#20

Okay. Great guys. Let's just back to the comment, Richard, that you made around forward booking strengthening from late May. And I guess we were deep in the first part of the fuel crisis at that stage. Could you talk to forward bookings where they are today on a kind of a sector by sector or business segment by business segment perspective, and particularly against the prior year, please?

Unknown Executive

executive
#21

Yes. I can give you the risk of giving you generalizations on that, just reinforcing some of the comments that we've made. Domestic demand -- 2 things in domestic. In the early part of the sort of fuel crisis to reiterate the point, Nikhil, we put prices up in immediate response to the fuel price increases. We saw almost, in some cases, more than unit elasticity. We saw volumes drop off as fast as we were putting prices up. Since May, that has stabilized significantly. And although we're flying fractionally more now and planning to fly -- sorry, we're flying fractionally less now and planning to fly flat 2% less over the course of the financial year, we are seeing fares starting to stick now. And so the recovery rate Kris's point, are improving very much domestically. For outbound international long-haul international, the market is still very soft. So we are seeing some price increases working their way through, but volume is flat, in some cases, down. And we're particularly exposed to that at this time of year. where the inbound market, we're a seasonal market for tourism, the inbound market is smaller seasonally than it normally is, as you well know, -- and we normally look to New Zealand outbound demand to fill the airplanes in the sort of fourth or third trimester fourth quarter of the year. Having said all of that, we are seeing some very encouraging signs. So out of Asia, we're seeing very strong increases in [ RASK] on slightly reduced capacity at the moment. The same is true for North America and the Tasman is holding up. We put quite a lot of capacity into the [indiscernible], particularly over the last 12 months. probably haven't seen as bigger RASK improvements as we'd like, but the market has absorbed that extra capacity. We feel good about that. So without putting sort of specific percentage or on a inbound, we're seeing strong demand domestic and outbound New Zealand travel flat, down slightly. Overall, we are seeing sort of RASK improvements now in a broad range, but sort of between for in 6%, 7%, depending on the market, which is very encouraging.

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#22

And Andy, maybe 2 data points if you're interested in terms of sales momentum, this latest week, sales have been 12% ahead of the same time last year. And over the last 4 weeks, sales have been about 15% ahead. So it feels like we're carrying a little bit of momentum into this FY.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#23

That's good, encouraging. Could I just dig down into domestic New Zealand point of sale demand in terms of the various customer sets that you've got. How does that look in terms of current bookings or however you look at it at that level with regards to leisure with regards to SME, corporate and government, et cetera, please?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#24

Year-on-year?

Andy Bowley

analyst
#25

Yes, yes.

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#26

Yes. So we are seeing...

Andy Bowley

analyst
#27

And trend in terms of how that's progressing?

Unknown Executive

executive
#28

Yes. So I think over the last 3 or 4 months, we've seen -- before Iran, actually, we were seeing some encouraging signs domestically. The Middle Eastern crisis put a pause on that. But we are continuing to see a small but an encouraging improvement in corporate and SME demand that is flowing through. in leisure in terms of volumetrically, relatively flat. But as I said before, we're starting to see some encouraging signs in terms of yield on domestic even with leisure. So it's -- the challenge is volume. We are starting to see customers become accustomed to the sort of domestic air fares we need to charge to recover.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#29

Sorry, Richard, I'm really struggling to hear you.

Unknown Executive

executive
#30

Can you hear me now?

Andy Bowley

analyst
#31

That's better. Yes.

Unknown Executive

executive
#32

Is it better. Sorry, I'll sit much closer to the microphone. We're seeing some improvements year-on-year in corporate and SME. Leisure volumes year-on-year are relatively flat, but we're seeing some improvement in yield.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#33

Great. Okay. And government.

Unknown Executive

executive
#34

Government, slightly up.

Andy Bowley

analyst
#35

Okay. Great. That's it from me, from a question point of view. But to echo Nikhil's words on you Richard it's been also interacting with you over the last 6 years or so and best wishes for your next journey.

Unknown Executive

executive
#36

Thank you, Andy. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thank you.

Operator

operator
#37

Next, we have [ Nick ] [indiscernible] from Macquarie.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#38

Just following on, on the sort of PPT side. So if we took the '26 numbers and added back the $465 million, you're at circa $130 million. You've obviously got a bit of cost saving to annualize by the looks a bit about another sort of $50-odd million plus whatever else you start to pick up further. Can you just talk about what the next bridge is to get back to pick a $400 million number and cover your cost of capital?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#39

Kris, do you want to take this?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#40

Yes, Nick, thanks for that question. We're not in a position to give that sort of specific guidance at this point in time. I mean I think the math that you're doing is good. What I would say is that a lot of the cost out work and productivity improvement that we're doing now has to offset inflation. So it doesn't. We can't just bank it at the PBT level. This is going to take a period of time. I think we sort of -- we describe FY '27 as a transition year, and that's the oil crisis, but it's not just that. We've got the engine item and that's reducing. And we'd hope it to be significantly better in FY '28. But one thing that we're going to try and do later this financial year is have an Investor Day. And that's somewhere where we think we're going to try and give you much more sort of information about this sort of bridge.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#41

Okay. No, that's helpful. And then just on the net debt number, that was sort of a bit better than expected given the sort of degree of challenges in the second half, what was the sort of main other working capital movements. Obviously, transportation sales was sort of fund bucket, but the upper sort of number, which was $331 million. Was there anything sort of one-off or specific now?

Unknown Executive

executive
#42

Nothing specific.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#43

Okay. That's good. And in terms of just some of the washups that might come through in '27 previously talked about trying to get some recoveries on the lease engine issues that you've had and sort of renegotiating with sort of [indiscernible] on serious things. Could they be material on a positive basis in '27?

Unknown Executive

executive
#44

In terms of additional compensation?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#45

[indiscernible] sort of getting back some of [indiscernible].

Unknown Executive

executive
#46

I don't think so, Nick. I think at this stage, we still have compensation agreements in place. The conversation we're getting obviously abates pretty rapidly now. with the aircraft or the engines becoming serviceable. There are some elements of this cost that we will still look to recover. But the short answer to your question is I don't see it being materially sort of improved on what we've got currently. So the biggest single challenge we've got going into FY '27 is the compensation will now abate quite quickly. We are exiting some of the additional costs that we've incurred on engines and [indiscernible] as quickly as we can. One of [indiscernible] planes is out of service now to get that to be returned we so. There are 2 dry-lease 777s and still a handful of commercially leased Pratt & Whitney 1100 engines that will take another 12 or 15 months to sort of extract from the system. So we are expecting -- it was $190 million of headwind this year net of compensation. We expect there still to be $70 million to $90 million headwind in the year ahead as we progressively retire some of those residual costs, and I'm not sure we're going to get too much more out of the lessors, but the team will keep working hard on it, and I'm sure.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#47

That's helpful. And just lastly, any interesting observations on what competition are doing out there sort of ties wanting to kick back into the market from next year, I think, anything else sort of going on that's good or bad for you guys?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#48

Thankfully, Nick, what we're seeing is competition behaving rationally, which is what we would all hope to see in dealing with a crisis like this. And that's across all of our markets. So long may that continue.

Operator

operator
#49

Next, we have Marcus Curley from UBS.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#50

Good morning, team, can you hear me?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#51

Yes, we can.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#52

Great. Can I just start with the balance sheet. Can you just probably provide a little bit of context in terms of how much flexibility you've got to wait for the EBITDA to improve given the debt-to-EBITDA covenant is a bit below target. Just keen to understand what you're managing there?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#53

I'm not sure it's a covenant. But let me pass it on to Kris to respond in the first instance and then jump in, Richard.

Unknown Executive

executive
#54

I'll jump in first, Marcus. So just I think everybody is clear on this. We have no covenants in any of our borrowing, secured or unsecured. So I think that's important, number one. Number two, is we do have still considerable balance sheet flexibility. You will have noticed in this half and in response to the fuel price crisis. We are taking advantage of our very significant unencumbered aircraft pull for some relative very affordable, flexible financing. So we have a secured revolving credit facility USD 40 million at our disposal. We've used half of that. We've got 60 odd. I think it's 61 unencumbered and reincomberable aircraft in the fleet. We've reencumbered 15 of those, and so we've got a lot of flexibility there. So the key thing really in all of this is just to make sure as we sort of get EBITDA back to where it needs to be, that we retain the investment-grade credit rating with Moody's and we're in regular communication with them around sort of the expected trajectory around that. So clearly balance sheet flexibility, not we're in pretty good shape, Marcus.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#55

And the discussions with Moody's could you give us any color in terms of what they're looking for from the business?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#56

Yes. Marcus, it's Chris here, and thank you for the questions. going to be meeting Moody's with the team on the 8th of September. And so I'll go through all of that with them then and follow-up once we've got that. Richard, I think, has covered most of the other points, which is strong balance sheet and need to return to profitability.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#57

Secondly, can you just provide a little bit of color in terms of how much crack spread coverage you have in the hedging book at the moment, just as a percentage of your total requirements?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#58

It's about 20% in the first half, and that's it.

Unknown Executive

executive
#59

Marcus sorry, Richard here. The only other thing I'd add to that, it's the correct spreads we've got in place are about USD 39, so much more than we'd normally pay, but less than the spot at the moment. And because it's a less liquid market, they're in the form of swaps not -- they're not optionated. It's probably the only other thing worth noting.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#60

Okay. You mentioned in the release a further expected 10% increase in import charges. I suppose you could quantify that in terms of dollar headwind for the business in '27?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#61

Marcus, it's Kris again. I think the what the release points to is a number of airports, which are increasing charges at double digits, whether in FY '27 or into FY '28 and onwards. So there's just sort of a theme of airport charges going up both recent history and into the future, really way above inflation or what passengers would want to be paying. So look at something, as you know, we're working on very hard.

Unknown Executive

executive
#62

Sorry, Marcus. I mean, aeronautical charge is our fourth largest cost line and we pay about over $400 million a year in those as a business.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#63

Okay. And then finally, I just wondered if you could look forward to FY '28. So on the basis of having the fleet where you'd want to end and obviously, removing any of the leases that you don't need. What does capacity likely look like?

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#64

Maybe, Marcus, let me answer it this way. We've got 2 wide-bodies and 2 narrow-body orders that we're expecting in FY '27. We are looking to exit one of the 777 dry leases in the same period, and we will further exit 2 of the 777 dry leases in FY '28. And we're expecting 2 additional wide-bodies and 2 additional narrow-bodies to be delivered in the FY '28 time frame. So the capacity movements are there, but we're also taking deliveries of some new aircraft. Actual capacity we end up deploying into the market will depend heavily on what fuel is doing at any point in time.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#65

Okay. No, I appreciate that. But if you were -- but back in a fuel environment that you were comfortable with. I'm just trying to get a feel of where the capable capacity of the business could be on a normalized basis. So am I right in assuming that you've got broadly speaking, an equal match of what's coming in, in the next 12 months with what's exiting through leases?

Kris Cudmore

executive
#66

No. Capacity increases overall, Marcus. So net of retirement or sort of end of leases, we've got -- we're expecting to grow capacity between sort of 3% and 4%, I think, over the next -- annually over the next couple of years. But we've got plenty of flexibility, as you know, in the forward order book. The key thing at the moment is actually how we moderate it through the next 12 or 18 months, just depending on how the [indiscernible] situation calls out because, of course, we've got a lot of virtual capacity coming back with the AOG situation writing itself, and then we've got additional aircraft joining the fleet as well. So I think our ability to respond to a materially lower fuel price -- sort of few concerns about.

Marcus Curley

analyst
#67

[indiscernible]

Operator

operator
#68

Thank you for the questions. This concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn back to Nikhil for closing remarks.

Nikhil Ravishankar

executive
#69

Well, thanks, everybody, for joining and appreciate those questions from Nick, Andy and Marcus. And as Chris said, we're hoping to host an Investor Day later this year. So we'll make sure that you get ample advance notice for that. With that, we'll close the call.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Air New Zealand Limited transcript — plus 253,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Air New Zealand Limited earnings transcripts and 253,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.