Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 16, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Materials conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#1

Terrific. Well, again, this is Duffy Fischer from Barclays Chemical, and I have Mike Leithead, who's on the team with us as well. And we're very happy to welcome the team from Air Products today. We have CEO, Seifi Ghasemi; we have COO, Dr. Serhan, with us; and then we have both Simon and Mun from IR if they need to step in. But Seifi, again, always very happy to have you. Again, normally, we like to do it down in Miami, but we'll do the best we can virtual this year.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#2

Generally, we always start off just by asking you because your business is so concurrent with what's happening in the industrial world. If you could kind of just walk around the world, walk around your end markets and kind of talk about what you're seeing in the market, what your expectations are for COVID impact and for recovery from COVID.

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#3

Well, thank you very much, Duffy, and it's a pleasure to be here with you and the rest of the people who are listening to this broadcast. And as you said, I have Dr. Samir Serhan, who is our Chief Operating Officer, with me to help me answer the questions. In terms of what we see, if I may start from the eastern part of the world, we are very bullish, as I'm sure it doesn't come as a surprise to anybody, about what's going on in China and in Asia in general. Chinese economy is back up. The COVID has been -- they don't have any COVID issues. Our people are going to work as normal. Industrial production in China was up 8.3%. The exports from China were up 18%. Our business there has gotten back to normal. Obviously, in the month of February, there is going to be a break because of the Chinese New Year. But overall, we are doing fine in Asia, except for this fund project that we have that the Lu'An thing that it did affect our numbers last quarter, and it will affect our numbers this quarter. Then in Korea, we are doing fine. In Taiwan, we are doing fine. Malaysia, we are doing fine. And in India, we have a joint venture. It's not huge. We do not consolidate it. But again, business is doing very well in general. And now, we are one of the largest supplier -- we are the largest supplier of oxygen in India, and unfortunately, because of COVID, there is a lot of demand for that. And you can see that our so-called equity affiliate businesses are doing very well, actually. Then we get to -- in the Middle East, the biggest thing we have is Jazan, and we can talk about that. In Europe, our people are doing a very good job to live with the downturn as a result of the COVID thing. We have been able to continue to increase prices, keep our costs under control. So our performance in Europe, as you saw last quarter, was actually good, and we hope that, that will continue. But economic conditions in general in Europe has -- have not improved yet. We don't see that. Then when we come to the Americas, that is where we have issues in terms of the impact of COVID. We do not see the U.S. economy picking up, industrial production picking up. And sometimes when I say that people say, well, look at our competitors' volume, they are doing fine. Well, that is because of their portfolio because they have a lot of exposure to health care. So if you are in health care in the U.S., you are going to do well, unfortunately, because of COVID, or same thing in Europe. Right now, if you add oxygen, you can set it for just about any price in Mexico or in Brazil. So we do not have that exposure. Our exposure is mainly to the industrial side. And so I'm not very optimistic about the prospects of the U.S. economy. And Latin America is obviously an issue, and it will continue to be an issue. Although right now, we are seeing some sign of improvement because of COVID, quite honestly, because we are selling a lot of oxygen. So that's kind of a very general way of talking about it. And obviously, I'll be more than happy to go into any further details that you want us to.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#4

Sure. Yes. We'll dig into a lot of it. If you don't mind, maybe I'll lob one to Dr. Serhan.

Samir Serhan

executive
#5

Sure.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#6

You've been there now 3 years. So -- and you haven't been in front of investors a whole lot. But in this new role, obviously, you will be. Maybe talk about exactly what your purview is today, what are you focused on. And then kind of looking over that 3 years, what do you think Air Products does really well? And where do you think that Air Products can improve?

Samir Serhan

executive
#7

Actually, thanks, Duffy. It's a pleasure to be with you. Actually, this is my fifth year at Air Products, so it's been really very exciting. I mean my responsibilities at Air Products is technology, business development, engineering, project execution, organization worldwide. I have responsibilities also for the Americas business, Middle East, India and also some of our equipment technology business like LNG and Gardner. It's been exciting. We have a resilient business model where we really have people working together in making their dreams a reality and executing our growth strategy with very strong focus on sustainability objectives. So it's been exciting really dealing with these mega projects all over the world. We're active almost in every single continent, so it's really a great time of my life. We have done a lot at Air Products to execute, to be able to execute these mega projects. So we have developed a program that's called high-performance organization with 14 project leaders. If you look at our organization, how can we simplify it, focus on accountability, make sure that we have talented, committed people, streamline of processes because we're doing execution in 24 hours around the world. So you really need to have solid infrastructure and processes, updated our tools, how we do really our engineering, how we do our procurement, project controls. So we fill in many gaps where we really feel good now about delivering on our projects and our growth strategy.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#8

Perfect. Seifi, maybe jump back to you because you and I kind of have the favorite same chart, your EBITDA chart that you've shown since you've been there. But the last 2 quarters, it's ticked down a little bit. So one of the questions I get from investors a lot is, if you look at the last 4 or 5 quarters, what's the right way to think about the extrapolation of that going forward? I mean how much of that tick-down was just COVID-reduced volumes? How much of that was maybe just a little bit of pricing that came back? From that base for the last 4 or 5 quarters, how should we think about that over the next 1, 2, 3 years in your view?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#9

I think that -- we have talked about this thing, Duffy, and it's a very good question. A while ago, about 2 years ago, we had gotten to about 35%, and we were the best performing. And people, they are asking me, "What should we assume?" And I said, "35%, 36% would be a good number." I think right now, I can say that I think something a number between 39% and 41% is a good number in terms of EBITDA margins. Our margins do go up and down. Right now, there are 2 things that has affected our margin: one is, in general, the COVID thing, obviously. But the second thing is that when you have a project like Lu'An where we are not getting the full income from that. That obviously affects our margin. So overall, when things come back to normal and then when and if Jazan comes on stream, that would -- so I'm pretty confident that in the next few years, EBITDA margin of 39% to 41% would be a good average for Air Product.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#10

Fair enough. And then you mentioned a couple of the big projects, and that's been a big part of the story for Air Products over the last couple of years. So let's drill down into kind of the 3 big ones, maybe starting with Lu'An. Hit a speed bump, your fourth quarter, calendar third quarter, we found out about it. So walk us through kind of what's happened in the interim and how we should think about it is we're doing our modeling or handicapping a value for Air Products. Again, with this 1 particular plant, which, again, coal gasification was a big part of the growth story and a number of the unnamed projects, yet they're unannounced projects that we'd like to do. So how does that follow on to impact future projects as well?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#11

Yes. Well, I think that we have to look at Lu'An in a proper context. Number one, everybody is focused on Lu'An, but we have 4 other gasification projects that we are participating in. The Lu'An investment that we have is about $900 million at the time we made the investment. Obviously, it's lower now. But the other projects that we are involved with coal gasification in China, the investment is around $1.2 billion. Those are all going fine. So Lu'An is not an example of what is going -- the dynamics in Lu'An should not be interpreted as if affecting gasification in China and so on. Lu'An is a particular case. What is the particular case about Lu'An? I hope you get some credit for being transparent and telling you all the details. Because quite frankly, if you hadn't said anything, I'm not sure if people have -- would have figured out if we have 1 or 2 quarters back and forth with EBITDA. A specific issue is that we have no issue with Lu'An. We have been getting paid. We went into the shutdown. It was -- the plan was operating very well. The turnaround was successful. We got paid per contract. Then when it came time in October to restart the facility, that is when Lu'An decided, "Hey, I want to keep the plant shut down because we are doing a reorganization, and our new Chairman wants to take a look at all of the projects," okay? So then the question was, "What do we do?" The first thing that we decided to do is, we should tell the investors, exactly what is happening. The second thing was that, okay, what options do we have? One option is to say, "Well, sorry, you're shutting down the plant. You are obligated with us in accordance with the contract that you need to pay us because this is not a scheduled shutdown or anything." And they would have said no, and then we would have gone to court, right? We figured out that is it worth it to go to court which takes a few months to go to and get hearings and all of that, and then by that time, the plant will get restarted, and then all we have done is done a lot of damage to our reputation, to their reputation and all of that. So we made the conscious decision that, look, customer, we understand why you are shut down. We'll give you some time, I mean, but in the meantime, we can get 0, so give us a reduced fee. And then when you come back on, you come back on. But because of the reduced fee, whatever the length of the time is, you need to extend the contract so that our overall project stays the same. That is what they have agreed to. That's what they have done. So we have done this thing in order to preserve our relationship with the customer that we like, we respect, and we think we have a lot of opportunities for in the future. And this is not just a customer, it's the state of Changzhi province because they -- it's a state-owned company. So that is -- we can get criticized for the fact that, why are you doing this thing? Well, we are doing it because I think it's the right thing to do, and we don't want to damage our relationship with these people. So to interpret Lu'An as if the contracts in China are big or coal gasification is a big thing, that is -- that would not be the right way of looking at it. And I know that we have some competitors who would like to portray it that way, and they say, "I told you so. You see this is why I'm not in this business." While they say they are not in this business, while at the same time, they are doing -- all they are doing in Singapore, they're doing coal gasification, but -- gasification project. But I don't want to go there. Whatever our competitors want to do or say, it's none of my business. We made a conscious decision to work with this customer rather than trying to kind of be difficult, where we didn't think that it would be to our best interest for the long term.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#12

Fair. Yes. And I think, listen, most people would give you kudos for the way you've worked it out. I think the biggest criticism that I've heard on this from investors is just the original decision to put the $900 million in because the way it looks to us on the outside is this plant is close to breakeven on its production at current oil prices. Again, it is -- because we don't know, right? Lu'An's not public, so we don't get to see their numbers. But that seems to be the perception is that this plant is not making the returns that the company would like through Lu'An, and that's why it's been shut down. But obviously, you would have a better view on that kind of stuff. So from your standpoint, do you think the actual Lu'An plant itself is a good economic vehicle to run for years into the future?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#13

Well, that is our judgment. That's why we work with the customer. And besides that, it's one thing to talk about Lu'An then oil prices there, $30, and it's another thing to talk about it today, then oil prices are $60. Yes, the exchange. Yes.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#14

Fair. So let's jump into the next big project in Saudi, Jazan. Give us an update how you think that's going, obviously. On the last call, you talked about it proceeding better than you thought at the end of your Q4. But again, what should people on the outside be trying to extrapolate from that? How comfortable are you that you can get that deal done? And would you or would you not advise people to actually put that in their numbers for Air Products at some point in the next year as we're trying to model you into the future?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#15

Well, I'll have Dr. Serhan here. He is intimately involved in Jazan. He has a lot of his people there, and I'd like him to make some comments. But before that, I'm obviously a lot more optimistic about Jazan than I was in November when we talked. We have been able to reach a principal agreement with the Saudi Aramco senior management. It's just a matter of putting that to work. As far as ventured people put it in their numbers, as long as they have waited this long, I would wait until 2 or 3 months until we actually do it and then put it in the numbers. That would be the safest thing to do. But Samir, would you like to give people a flavor of where we are in the -- not only in the negotiation, but also in terms of the activities in the plants and all of that?

Samir Serhan

executive
#16

Sure. I mean, definitely, we're having very productive discussions with Saudi Aramco. Financial terms are agreed. We're finalizing now the commercial agreements. Project financing is proceeding well. And behind the scene, there is around 800 people between Saudi Aramco, ACWA and Air Products exports, working on commissioning the facility to get it really on stream as soon as possible. So we do see clearly the finish line, and we are very much aiming for that finish line as soon as possible. And just to put things into perspective, we're familiar with the customer, with that site. We -- as you recall, that mean we had a $2 billion investment there for the ASU. That was a mega project for us. And we managed to execute that on a schedule, quality, under costs, under budget and also 27 million hours without a lost time incident. So -- and this is really what attracted Saudi Aramco to Air Products to do this bigger transaction. And to put things into perspective, you're talking about 1 deal here for around USD 12 billion. I mean this is a one of a kind in the industrial gas business. That takes you sometimes hundreds of ASU projects to do, and each one of them may negotiate for 2, 3 years before you get there. Now you're doing that all in 1 project with 1 BFC. So it puts things into perspective about this project. Yes, maybe it's a little bit behind the schedule, but the size and the complexity of this transaction, it's really warranted to do the right things.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#17

Fair enough. And then maybe staying in Saudi going to your exciting new green project in NEOM, I think the pushback I get from -- I mean investors love it. I mean ESG is all the rage, and so people want to see the industrial gas companies and Air Products on the forefront of helping green the world. But the project seems exceedingly big, just not CapEx for an ammonia plant. If you want to just be a little bit disparaging, it's an ammonia plant, although it's green ammonia, but that's a lot of CapEx for an ammonia plant. So can you help walk people through, again, from the outside, how we should model the economics of that, just what that will look like? And what will we have surety on? What won't we have surety on around the project?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#18

First of all, it is not an ammonia plant. It's a green hydrogen facility. Ammonia is just a means of transferring that. So one cannot take -- say, okay, they are making ammonia in Saudi Arabia, what are they going to sell it for and therefore, it is not economical and things like that. You need to take it and saying that ammonia is a means of transferring it, and then they're going to convert it to hydrogen and sell the hydrogen. And what is the hydrogen worthwhile. So the second thing is that, obviously, the -- if it was a normal project with no risk, then everybody else would be doing it. This is a little bit like -- I mean I don't want to make out-of-proportion comparisons, but it's a little bit like -- I mean look at Tesla, I mean, when they started, everybody was saying, "Oh, what is this? I mean, electric car, it's a motor with 4 wheels on it. If GM can do it, if Volkswagen can do it, but you see what the things that's happen. Somebody has to take the risk of doing a border scale plant and saying this is feasible. That person, whomever it is, which is us now, is going to get rewarded that if it works, you are the first one who has done it, and you have the -- all of the advantage of the -- being the first one. So that is the risk that we are taking. I'm not suggesting at all that there is no risk involved. But at the end of the day, as they say, no risk, no reward. Because if we sit down and say, "Oh, my God, there is a lot of risk," then they don't do it. Everybody then -- then nobody does it. It hasn't made. But if you believe that the world is moving in this direction, that, that is a mega trend, then it is worth taking the risk of doing a project like this. And if you are successful, then you will be a big winner, and it's just like anything else. So there's no way that we are going to pretend that this is a risk-free thing. At the end of the day, we are spending $7 billion with no customer, so that is a risk. But it's a calculated risk. We don't think there's any technology risk, and we think that the cost of the project, the location that we are is going to prove to be competitive. But at the end of the day, I'll be the last one to say there is no risk involved, there is.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#19

Fair. And then the way the deal was structured, I guess, why couldn't it have been structured a little differently? Because obviously, your expertise is in the hydrogen and you would have some expertise going into ammonia, transporting it, converting it back to hydrogen. But you don't know much about wind. You don't know much about solar. So I'm just -- one thing people ask is why couldn't it have been broken up kind of in a modular fashion where ACWA would do the solar and you would sign a contract for a certain price coming off the solar and the wind, but then you would basically be investing in what you really know best as opposed to things that you're going to have to lean on some other people that maybe you won't have as much control as you'd like or the project on?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#20

But the deal is almost structured like that, my friend. We are 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 investment. So we could have set up 2 companies, one would have been -- and we talked about that. One would have been that ACWA, you make the power, and then you sell us the power. But the downside of that is that, well then if this project becomes very successful, then somebody else has control over the power. And then we will be sitting there with the -- yes, with the great electrolysis, but no power to run it. So it was better -- we thought it was better to get everybody a skin in the game, including NEOM, so that NEOM is going to help us with the local -- the rules, local taxes and all of that and the land and all that. ACWA Power is part of this thing, so we thought the one project will have a better attraction. Now another part of the world, we might do it differently, but we did think about that. But we thought that in this particular location, it was better to have everybody in the same boat. But the key thing is that Air products has 100% control over the molecules.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#21

Fair. Okay. And then another question we get a lot, why thyssenkrupp when you think about that model for producing the hydrogen versus some of the others? What's your view on the technology, both today and over the next 10 years about what wins on hydrogen production from electrolysis?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#22

It's very simple. We wanted to do the project now and have a green hydrogen in 2025. The other technology that you are talking about, which is the PEM technologies of Siemens and these other companies, they are not ready. They just absolutely do not have the capacity to build anything of this scale. So thyssenkrupp was the one who had the technology. So 5 years from now, if those projects -- if those technologies develop and people can build this -- I mean, right now, those people can build a 10-ton plant. But for a 650-ton plant, they just didn't have the capability. We looked at all of those technologies. But they were just not -- they were not there.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#23

Fair enough. And then if you tie all this together, Jazan, NEOM, could we make the argument that you're trying to become the industrial gas preferred company in Saudi that you want to solidify kind of a strong partnership with a lot of the different industrial players there and maybe become larger over time with the combined SABIC and Saudi Aramco? Or how should we think about your strategy in the kingdom itself?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#24

Well, our strategy is that Saudi Aramco combined with SABIC is probably the largest customer we can possibly find in anywhere in the world for the kind of things that we do. So we obviously want to expand our relationship with them. If you have to put the requirements of Saudi Aramco and SABIC together for future projects, that's a lot of industrial gas applications that, obviously, we have expertise. We want to be involved in that. But the NEOM project was basically driven by the location, by division of NEOM, and that is separate from Saudi Aramco and SABIC.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#25

Okay. Maybe one back to Dr. Serhan. You're kind of taking the lead on a lot of the construction stuff. So when you think about where you want to go, obviously, it's a big lift from an engineering standpoint. Where are you today in the staffing of that in the seniority that you'd like and the knowledge level? How comfortable are you today with where you're at staffing wise? And where do you need to be in another 2 or 3 years from now? And do you have line of sight to kind of get there?

Samir Serhan

executive
#26

Definitely, the demand is high, and that's why for the last 2 years, we've been really adding significant amount of resources. We've added almost 2,000 people across the world in all of our execution centers in the U.S., India, Europe, Asia, Middle East. People really are excited about the story at Air Products, about what we're really doing, and we're really attracting top talent from our competitors from EPC companies. So again, we've been fortunate in managing to get these experienced people. And really, our results prove that. I mean we have around -- we are responsible for around 100 million hours of EPC projects that we were executing today. I mean -- and we are within 1% of the budget and the schedule on these projects, so it's really high performing. And we continue to also look for additional talent in all of our execution center to keep going with our group strategy.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#27

Fair. And then Seifi, one molecule that we don't talk a lot about, helium has had a nice run in the last couple of years. You called out a little bit of slowness around things like MRIs and balloons and stuff like that with COVID. When you put that together with -- I think the Russians have a pretty big project that they think is going to come on at some point in the next year. Is there a chance in your mind that helium kind of rolls over structurally? Or does the helium market feel to you like it's pretty solid for the next couple of years?

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#28

Well, helium is a particular kind of a product that -- you cannot manufacture helium. It is a naturally occurring thing, and there are not that many places. So when you look at the past 30, 40 years that I have experienced with it, it is a cycle. There is a shortage, then they find a new source, the same day that can you imagine what happened when Qatar decided to build their LNG facilities, and suddenly, the supply to the world doubled. But the good thing is that helium, on an underlying basis, grows about 2%, 3% a year. And the worldwide demand for helium is approximately depending on normal times, about 7 billion cubic feet a year. So each year, you need about 130 billion, 140 billion cubic feet of new products to come on stream. We don't know what is going to happen with the project in Russia, and there is a lot of discussion about the fact that, that project did come -- there was a lot of discussion that, that project will come on stream this coming year, 2021. But obviously, that's not the case. Whether that be '22, '23, how much it will come, then that will determine the supply-demand, but that is a product which is sensitive to supply-demand. And obviously, right now, the market is tight, but then the market might go along. So we just have to live with that cycle.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#29

Perfect. Well, listen, these things always end up being too short when there are only 30 minutes. But team Air Products, thank you very much for spending some time with us. Stay safe, and hopefully, we'll get to see each other in person at some point this year.

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#30

Thank you very much, Duffy. It's a pleasure to be with you and looking forward to getting together at least next February, okay? Take care.

Duffy Fischer

analyst
#31

Thanks, guys. Bye-bye.

Seifollah Ghasemi

executive
#32

Thank you, Samir. Thank you very much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.