Airbus SE (AIR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 29, 2025

Euronext Paris FR Industrials Aerospace and Defense earnings 60 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Airbus nine month 2025 earnings release conference call. I am Sharon, the operator for this conference. Please note that for the duration of the presentation, all participants will be in a listen only mode and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation there'll be an opportunity to ask questions. At this time I would like to turn the conference over to your hosts, Guillaume Faury, Thomas Toepfer and Hélène Le Gorgeu. Please go ahead.

Hélène Le Gorgeu

executive
#2

Thanks, Sharon, and good evening everyone. This is the conference call for Airbus's nine months 2025 earnings release. Guillaume Faury, our CEO, and Thomas Toepfer, our CFO, will present our results and take your questions. We expect this call to run for about an hour. That includes Q&A, which we'll hold after the presentation. This call is being webcast as well. You can access it through our homepage by clicking the dedicated banner. A playback of this call will be available on our website, though there is no dedicated phone replay service. The supporting information package was published on our website earlier today. It contains the slides we will now walk you through, along with the financial statement. During this call we will be making forward looking statements. I invite you to refer to our safe harbor statement that appears in the presentation slide, which applies to this call as well. Please read it carefully. Now over to Guillaume.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#3

Thanks, Hélène, and good day everyone. Appreciate your time in joining today's call covering our results for the first nine months of 2025. Thomas and I are in Amsterdam to take you through the numbers. The conditions we operate in stay complicated and fast-moving. Handling robust demand alongside the same supply chain pressures we've been facing — those haven't gone away — continues to call for relentless operational discipline and agility, especially given shifting trade policies. We're glad to see the U.S. EU Trade Agreement, which since the beginning of September has brought back a stable, tariff-free setting for trade in aircraft and parts. That's an essential step enabling our worldwide industry to proceed with the predictability required to invest and innovate. Even so, the geopolitical landscape, still unsettled, remains something we watch closely at all times. Against that backdrop, we're executing our plan to hit the A320 family production goal of rate 75 per month by setting up 10 A321 capable final assembly lines spanning four sites worldwide. Adding a second line recently in the United States, along with the second line in China, represents a key milestone for our global industrial growth strategy and strengthens our overall business resilience too. We're ramping up operations and growing capacity as we continue the commercial aircraft ramp up.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#4

Our commitment to European Defence is equally strong, and we remain focused on providing more competitive and innovative products and services through our 2 divisions, and we observe growing momentum regarding European strategic autonomy. Significant progress has been achieved toward consolidating our space activities alongside Leonardo and Thales, with the goal of establishing a leading European company. I will address this shortly. During Q3, we delivered 201 commercial aircraft, and since the engine situation is showing signs of recovery, the number of gliders now stands at 32 as of the end of September. That brings our year to date deliveries to 507 aircraft, compared with 497 last year. Deliveries remain back end loaded as we navigate the engine situation. A strong year end rally lies ahead of us and our teams are in the sprint. Our EBIT Adjusted was EUR 4.1 billion as of nine months 2025. This reflects the commercial aircraft deliveries and the solid performance at both Airbus Defence and Space and Airbus Helicopters. Our free cash flow before customer financing came in at -EUR 0.9 billion. It notably reflects the inventory buildup that supports the Q4 deliveries and the ramp up on that basis.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#5

We're keeping our 2025 guidance intact, and that now reflects the tariffs currently in force — we'll return to that point later. Turning to space, we've taken a significant strategic step. We're delighted about the recently announced signing of a Memorandum of Understanding, an MoU, with Leonardo and Thales aimed at creating a new European space player in 2027. As you may remember, I said clearly last year that our priority had to be fixing the foundations and bringing profitability back. That turnaround plan is now fully underway, and the early results please us. At the same time, we've been exploring strategic options for building scale and boosting competitiveness against global players. The aim of the new company is to unite and strengthen space capabilities by bringing together the three respective activities in satellite and space systems, manufacturing, and space services. This MoU represents a collective industry commitment to reinforcing the European space sector. Coming next, we will launch the social consultation process with our social partners, prepare the carve-out of the space businesses, and tackle regulatory requirements. It's a busy road ahead, and we're wholly dedicated to this major and exciting project. Let's turn now to our commercial environments, beginning with commercial aircraft.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#6

Passenger numbers kept climbing, and demand for air cargo stayed resilient as well. Across the nine months of 2025, we recorded 610 gross orders, 116 of which came in Q3. For the A220, gross orders totaled 40, and on the A320 family we logged 371 gross orders. That takes our backlog to 7,105, roughly 75% of which is for the A321 — and the 7,105 figure, of course, covers only the A320 family. Turning to widebodies, we booked 90 gross orders on the A330, which confirms how strong demand is for these versatile products. Lastly, the A350 brought in 109 gross orders, underscoring the ongoing commercial momentum of what has become the market's reference. Net orders came to 514 aircraft, among them 96 cancellations that were mostly expected and already reflected in how we value our backlog. At the close of September, our total backlog in units was 8,665 aircraft, as of December 2024. On Helicopters, net orders for the nine months of 2025 reached 306, versus 308 during the same period of 2024. Quite comparable, and nicely distributed across the portfolio. Momentum remains positive, especially in military markets, and we stay focused on locking in new business opportunities both in our home countries and in export markets.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#7

An Airbus final assembly line is going to be set up in India for building H125 helicopters together with Tata Advanced Systems, with the goal of seizing the full potential of the civil, para, public, and military markets across South Asia. To wrap up, let me point out that we've consolidated our offering of small and medium tactical uncrewed aerial systems, UAS, the drones, into one comprehensive portfolio run by the Airbus Helicopters Division. The purpose here is to deliver a focused market approach for defense and security customers and to give customers cutting-edge capabilities for surveillance, intelligence, and operational flexibility. Lastly, in Defence and Space, order intake comes to EUR 6.8 billion for the nine months on air power. That notably reflects an order from the Royal Thai Air Force for a next-generation Airbus A330 MRTT+. This advanced aircraft is an evolution of the combat-proven A330 MRTT, bringing in innovations from the A330neo along with upgraded military capabilities, in particular the new engine of the NEO that is now on the MRTT+. Still on air power, let me highlight the recent contract with Germany for the acquisition of 20 Eurofighter aircraft to be produced at our final assembly line in Nanjing and to be delivered to the German Air Force starting from 2031.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#8

Order intake gets booked only after every contractual condition has been satisfied, which means it hasn’t been captured in Q3 yet. Demand for the Eurofighter is likewise robust in export markets beyond the Eurofighter partner nations, and this week’s pledge by Turkey to buy 20 units showed that as well. On Eurodrone, the program is advancing: earlier this month we wrapped up the CDR, the critical design review, successfully. That formally closes the design stage and opens the path toward prototypes, production, and ground testing before the first flight on FCAS. We stay convinced that Europe requires its future combatant system so it can address its security challenges and keep building the critical skills and know-how in this domain. Considering how much effort and investment this takes, we are convinced — I am convinced — of the value of a collaborative approach, and we plan to take a leading role in getting it done, one way or another. Broadly, regarding the defense side of our Airbus Defence and Space and Helicopters businesses, we hope to ride a growing momentum and we expect that to carry on for the foreseeable future.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#9

Thanks, Thomas. Thomas is now going to walk you through our financials.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#10

Guillaume, and hello everyone. I'm on page seven of the presentation now, and as Guillaume mentioned, I'll walk you through our financial performance. On the chart, you can see that revenues for the first nine months of 2025 rose to EUR 47.4 billion, an increase of 7% year-on-year. That mainly reflects a bigger contribution from our divisions, stronger services volumes across our businesses, and a higher level of deliveries, partly offset by the depreciation of the U.S. dollar. On the right-hand side, you can see that R&D expenses came in at EUR 2.1 billion for the first nine months of the year, which is lower than in the nine months of 2024. We keep benefiting from the prioritization of our activities. For the full year, we now expect R&D expenses in 2025 to be slightly lower than in 2024. Now let's turn to EBIT Adjusted on page 8. As you can see, EBIT Adjusted for the nine months of 2025 went up to EUR 4.1 billion, from EUR 2.8 billion in the nine months of 2024. Let me remind you that during the nine months of last year, we booked EUR 989 million of charges in our space business, and obviously those did not recur as of the nine months of this year.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#11

Increased commercial aircraft deliveries bring with them a mix that is less favorable, and that is compensated for by a more favorable hedge rate plus reduced R&D expenses, and it also shows stronger performance across both divisions. Allow me to clarify just what the currently applicable tariffs will do. Right now our expectation is that this will come to somewhere between EUR 100 million and EUR 200 million across the full year, though the vast majority of that will land in Q4. As the right hand side of the page shows, EBIT Adjustments came to a net -EUR 0.8 billion. Let me take you through the items: included is a -EUR 577 million impact stemming from the dollar working capital mismatch and the balance sheet revaluation, chiefly reflecting the mechanical effect of the gap between transaction date and delivery date, with -EUR 186 million of that arising in Q3. Second, there is -EUR 105 million tied to the Airbus Defence and Space restructuring, which we booked back in Q1, and there is -EUR 88 million tied to stabilization of certain Spirit AeroSystems work packages, with EUR 31 million of that booked in Q3, and lastly -EUR 11 million of other items, compliance costs and Moda among them.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#12

So for the first nine months of 2025, our reported EBIT comes to positive EUR 3.4 billion, and the financial result was positive EUR 374 million. That figure mostly mirrors the revaluation of some equity investments along with the revaluation of financial instruments, partly offset by how the U.S. dollar moved. On the core business, the tax rate remains near 27%. The effective tax rate, though, sits at 32.4%, which includes the tax impact from revaluing certain equity investments plus a net impairment of deferred tax assets. We continue to anticipate that the French surtax will have an impact of roughly EUR 300 million in 2025, affecting both P&L and cash. During the nine months of this year, we booked the portion tied to 2024 along with the portion that corresponds to the first nine months of this year. Net income as a result is EUR 2.6 billion, with reported earnings per share of EUR 3.34, as the chart shows. Adjusted EPS for the nine months of 2025 came in at 3, on an average of 790 million shares. With that, let's move to page nine and examine our coverage of U.S. dollar exposure. In line with what we mentioned in our business update, we started putting in place a limited number of zero cost collars — precisely $2.1 billion during the quarter — within our hedge portfolio.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#13

That $2.1 billion figure refers to dollars, clearly not euros. The goal behind this approach is to tackle the longer-term horizon while keeping volatility at an acceptable level, and potentially to capture favorable movement in the U.S. dollar, while simultaneously obtaining protection should the dollar weaken materially. To be clear, our intention is not to replace our forwards; instead, we want to complement our coverage using a limited quantity of collars, and as noted, at this stage the collars will stay at roughly a single-digit percentage of the total. Once collars are integrated, the blended rate now incorporates the least favorable rate among our collars, which therefore gives you a protected, or conservative, view. Having said all that, as the page shows, during the nine months of 2025, $14.8 billion of forwards matured, with the related EBIT impact and euro conversions realized at a blended rate of $1.18, versus $1.21 in the nine months of 2024. We also put in place $12.7 billion of new coverage at a blended rate of $1.18. Consequently, our total U.S. dollar coverage portfolio, in U.S. dollar terms, stands at $80.7 billion with an average blended weight of $1.21, compared with $82.8 billion at $1.21 at the close of 2024.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#14

Turning to page 10, let's examine free cash flow. Before customer financing, free cash flow came in at -$0.9 billion across the first nine months of the year. The chart shows this outflow stemmed primarily from the working capital change, and it clearly mirrors the inventory build we planned in order to support ramping up throughout our businesses. A favorable phasing effect from cash receipts and payments on the A400M is also included. That aircraft weighed slightly negative on free cash flow during the nine months of 2025, since deliveries of it are loaded toward the back end. Even so, our expectation remains that it will be broadly neutral where free cash flow is concerned for the full year 2025. The chart also shows a nine month CapEx figure of -EUR 2.3 billion, and we still anticipate that number rising in 2025 to underpin our industrial ramp up, such that free cash flow was -EUR 0.8 billion, which includes customer financing of +EUR 0.1 billion. One thing we can state is that the environment for aircraft financing stays strong and competitive, and we anticipate ample liquidity to finance our 2025 deliveries.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#15

By the close of September, our net cash position was EUR 7 billion, which also takes into account the dividend payment and the weaker dollar environment. I want to emphasize that liquidity is still very strong, at roughly EUR 30 billion. As you may have seen, Moody's raised our credit rating in September to A1 with a stable outlook, and in our view this underscores both our consistently solid credit management and the strength of our balance sheet. With that, I'll hand it back to Guillaume.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#16

Thanks, Thomas. That's very clear. So let's begin with commercial aircraft. During the first nine months of 2025, we handed over 507 aircraft to 79 customers. Breaking that down by aircraft family, in narrowbodies we delivered 62 A220s along with 392 A320s. Of those 392 A320 family aircraft, 250 were A321s, which works out to 64% of A320 family deliveries. We're really pleased that Air New Guinea has received its first A220, making it the 25th operator of the aircraft worldwide, and it's now flying with carriers across five continents. The A320 family hit a major milestone by becoming the most delivered airliner in history. There's some pride there, as you can see, and we keep ramping up toward a rate of 75 A320 family aircraft per month in 2027. That's unchanged from our previous assumptions. On the A220, the present balance between supply and demand has resulted in an adjustment to the ramp-up trajectory and the ramp-up that lies ahead. We now aim to hit rate 12 in 2026, which allows time for integrating the Spirit AeroSystems work packages, mainly the wings, and for the progressive introduction of engine durability improvements for our customers. That means more work to reach breakeven, and our team is actually on it.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#17

During the nine months, we handed over 53 widebody aircraft — specifically 20 A330s and 33 A350s. As for the A330, we're presently holding steady at a production rate of 4 per month, which we introduced earlier. Our aim now is to get to rate 5 by 2029 so we can satisfy customer demand for the A330. Regarding the A350, nothing has changed. We're still targeting rate 12 in 2028. Turning to the A350 freighter, I'm happy to report that assembly has begun on the first flight test aircraft in Toulouse, and that aircraft is scheduled to fly next year. To sum up, our production continues according to plan. The difficulties we've faced this year remain the same — particularly with cabins, and for the A320, the ongoing pressure on engines, which left us with 32 gliders as of the end of September. The engine picture is beginning to improve, and we're still collaborating closely with the engine makers so we can meet our 2025 commitments. Let's now turn to the financials for our commercial aircraft business. Revenue grew 3% compared with a year earlier, largely driven by a greater number of deliveries along with growth in services. EBIT Adjusted came in at EUR 3.33 billion for the nine months, supported by favorable hedge rates and somewhat reduced R&D expenses.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#18

Now, that rise in deliveries carries with it an unfavorable mix. Turning to Helicopters: across the nine months, we handed over 218 helicopters — 28 more than at the nine months of 2024. Revenue was up around 16% to EUR 5.7 billion, which reflects a solid showing from programs and services growth. EBIT Adjusted rose to EUR 495 million, reflecting growth in services as well as higher deliveries. As I said earlier, let's wrap up our review with Defence and Space. Revenue grew 17% year-on-year to EUR 8.9 billion, driven by higher volumes across all business lines. EBIT Adjusted came in at EUR 420 million, supported by higher volumes and improved profitability, in line with the divisional mid term trajectory. On the A400M program, we are holding positive and forward-looking discussions with the launch nations and OCCAR. This was notably marked by the agreement reached in June with OCCAR to advance seven deliveries for France and Spain and to further increase the visibility we have on the production for the program. Given uncertainties regarding the level of aircraft orders, Airbus continues to assess the potential impact on the program's manufacturing activities. Risks on the qualification of technical capabilities and associated costs remain stable. Now on to our guidance, which, as you have seen, is maintained.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#19

With its 2025 guidance as the foundation, the company is assuming there will be no further disruptions affecting global trade or the world economy, air traffic, the supply chain, the company's internal operations, or its capacity to deliver products and services. Currently applicable tariffs are now reflected in the guidance. The guidance additionally reflects the effect of integrating certain Spirit AeroSystems work packages, based on preliminary estimates and an assumed closing in the fourth quarter of 2025. On that basis, for 2025 the company is targeting roughly 820 commercial aircraft deliveries and an EBIT Adjusted of approximately EUR 7 billion. We're not yet there, and free cash flow before customer financing of approximately EUR 4.5 billion. Just to clarify what I said about EBIT, we are targeting an EBIT Adjusted of approximately EUR 7 billion. The expected effect of integrating certain Spirit AeroSystems work packages on the company's guidance remains broadly consistent with earlier estimates. Maybe, Thomas, you'd like to add more precision on some of those elements?

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#20

Yes, allow me to add a few clarifications and specifics to your points, Guillaume. To start with tariffs, as I mentioned before, our expectation is that this will come in somewhere between $102 million and $200 million across the full year. The bulk of that overall figure will be booked in Q4. Next, regarding Spirit AeroSystems, by broadly in line we mean that the closing is now anticipated to happen before the year is out, and every party involved is dedicating all the effort required to the closing process. Operational readiness for day one remains on track. Naturally, this is later than we had expected at the start of this year, when we issued the guidance. Because we did not own the business during this delay, no negative operational result entered our free cash flow, so moving the closing into Q4 brings a partial benefit to free cash flow. Conversely, as you have also noticed in our financial statements, we extended credit lines to Spirit, and those are booked beneath the free cash flow line. Taken together, this stays broadly neutral with respect to the company's net cash position.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#21

Assuming nothing else changes, if you'd like, you can build that modest free cash flow positive adjustment—somewhere in the low triple digit range—into your models, though clearly the magnitude isn't big enough that it prompted us to revise the guidance. With that said, I'll hand it back to Guillaume.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#22

Thanks, Thomas, for those clarifications. I'll wrap up by going over our main priorities, which remain the same. We are still completely dedicated to carrying out the following phases of our commercial aircraft production ramp-up alongside our suppliers. There are two parts to our focus: tackling the specific supply chain pressures that are still with us — especially on narrow body engines, where durability continues to be a headwind, and on cabin — while at the same time getting ready to integrate the key Spirit AeroSystems work packages. As we concentrate on our production targets, we are also bringing to maturity the essential technologies that will shape the successor to the A320 family, consistent with our goal of pioneering the next generation of commercial aircraft. Turning to Airbus Defence and Space, we are making headway on our transformation and helping to build a European space leader. On European Defence, the industry is plainly on the move. We are taking on this challenge by drawing on the combined know-how of our Defence and Space and Helicopters divisions to drive scale and cooperation across Europe. Now let's move to your questions in the Q&A.

Hélène Le Gorgeu

executive
#23

Thank you, Guillaume, and thank you, Thomas. Our Q&A session begins now. Kindly state your name and the company you represent. At one time, please ask no more than two questions, and that count covers sub-questions as well. As always, we ask that you speak distinctly and at a measured pace so that every participant, especially those using self, can follow what you ask. Sharon, please proceed and walk the participants through how this will work.

Operator

operator
#24

Thanks, Hélène. At this point we'll open it up for questions. If you'd like to ask one, just press star one one on your phone's keypad — that's star one one to ask a question. We'll take our first question now. It comes from Benjamin Heelan at Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#25

Ben, we’re not getting any audio from you.

Benjamin Heelan

analyst
#26

Is this coming through okay now?

Guillaume Faury

executive
#27

Yes.

Benjamin Heelan

analyst
#28

Yeah, my apologies for that. The first question concerned the margin. In Q3, the margin strikes me as fairly favorable. Would you mind walking us through a few of the drivers? From where I sit, the mix in commercial appears quite strong. Any thoughts on that would be useful. Thanks.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#29

Ben, I believe we're going over the same ground a bit when we state that a single quarter's margin shouldn't be overestimated or overinterpreted. What I'd say is that the margin in commercial was, let's put it this way, positive. That doesn't automatically stem from the mix. In fact, the mix wasn't particularly helping us in Q3; it was driven more by, shall we say, cost discipline on SG&A and R&D, where the lead program we've launched is now truly delivering its full effect. We're quite pleased with, I'd say, the efficiency the company has demonstrated throughout the year and especially in Q3. The actions we've taken are not, let's say, short-term in nature; instead, we expect that we can actually maintain them along our trajectory. Second, I'd say that in Defence and Space, every division is performing well. There are two things driving this. First, our improvement program for Space is genuinely producing good effects, and we're very pleased with the results we're seeing — not just regarding the measures they're taking, but the first outcome, which is somewhat better than we had anticipated. Second, as Guillaume mentioned, there's good momentum in defense overall, where we see not only solid order intake but also, let's say, solid margins across the first nine months of the year.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#30

Rather than singling out the mix, I’d emphasize certain self-help steps and operational discipline that are providing support.

Benjamin Heelan

analyst
#31

All right, thanks. And a quick follow-up on that. I realize you're not going to hand us a delivery figure for 2026 today, but could you share any building blocks that would give us a rough sense of the direction we ought to be looking at for next year on the commercial delivery side? Thank you.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#32

I'd say there's nothing more today beyond what you already know regarding the A320 ramp-up trajectory. The A330 and the A350 have changed, as you've seen in what we're targeting for next year on the A220, where we aim to hit rate 12 rather than rate 14. Nothing new on that horizon apart from this slight adjustment on the A220, and we'll be targeting rate 5 for the A330 a bit later. That's essentially a lot of stability in the ramp-up trajectory compared with what we shared earlier in the year.

Benjamin Heelan

analyst
#33

Alright, thanks a lot. I appreciate that.

Operator

operator
#34

Thanks. We’ll take the next question from David Perry at JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

David Perry

analyst
#35

Yes. Hello, and good evening, Guillaume and Thomas. I have two brief questions, both about the tariff effect, Thomas. If the entire amount lands in Q4, should we annualize that effect as we look ahead? Regarding space, could you clarify precisely what is being included? Unless I'm wrong, I believe you're including somewhat more than only the manufacturing business. Perhaps I've misunderstood that, and perhaps you could add any other remarks about whether this transaction will meaningfully affect the ADS margin going forward, and whether you are making any equalization payments or receiving any. Thank you.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#36

Regarding those two questions, on the tariff effect, let me restate my earlier point. For the entire year, the impact will land somewhere between EUR 100 million and EUR 200 million. So why does most of it hit in Q4? The material we needed has already been shipped into the U.S. We keep it as work in progress, which means the tariff impact gets recorded only at the point when that material is actually built into the aircraft and the aircraft is sold. So, to answer your question, the Q4 effect should not be annualized. It is a one-off impact for this year, since a great deal of the effects from before September 1 are presently sitting in our WIP and will only come through once the aircraft is delivered. That is how the mechanic works. On your second question, if I understood it correctly, you mean Bromo. What are we bringing into that corporation? Two businesses, essentially our space services business, which today sits mainly in CI, and our space systems business, which is also a subdivision of Defence and Space. Clearly, the launcher business has nothing to do with it, as it is entirely separate, but we are bringing in both services and space systems.

David Perry

analyst
#37

So, does this deal significantly affect Airbus's margin going forward?

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#38

So look, we do anticipate mid triple digit synergies once we're 5 years past closing the deal. In the medium term, I'd say it should be clearly accretive to margin. At that point we'll hold a 35% stake in a business that's more efficient and more profitable than what we have now. And let's be honest, over the very short term, I wouldn't build a big impact into the models you probably have.

David Perry

analyst
#39

Alright, thanks a lot.

Operator

operator
#40

Thanks. The next question is from Ross Law at Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Ross Law

analyst
#41

Good evening, and thanks for taking my questions. First, on your full-year delivery guidance: since the engine suppliers have basically said they're providing the engines you need, what are the main challenges or bottlenecks still outstanding from here through year end? And then looking ahead to 2026 — obviously engines seem to be less of an issue than in 2024 and 2025, and the supply chain overall is performing better — is there any reason you won't be able to deliver a double-digit increase in deliveries in 2026, which is a growth rate you previously referred to? Thanks.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#42

I'll take the questions. Regarding 2025 and roughly 820 aircraft for the full year, the biggest issue is how many units still have to be handed over during the fourth quarter. What must be delivered in the final month is genuinely unprecedented. We aren't yet in a position where everything required to lock in all deliveries is in place. Engines are still anticipated over the coming weeks that will underpin a portion of 2025 deliveries. The real difficulty is the year's backloaded volume and ensuring nothing goes wrong or poses a problem that pushes aircraft past the end-of-2025 boundary. Plenty of effort involved. On the supply chain and engines, it appears we will get there. Once more, engine pressures remain a heavy item on our agenda. Those pressures will continue. There is, in fact, a broader context of carriers requiring additional engines for their in-service fleets on the Pratt & Whitney side, and on the CFM side as well. Engine manufacturers must keep raising output of parts and powerplants to serve both the airframers and their airline and lessor customers.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#43

On the engine availability tension, we’re not out of the woods yet. For the trajectory we’ve sketched out for 2026, we believe we’ll have what we need. Again, we’re not at the point of guiding for 2026. I confirm and I maintain what I said earlier: we are consistent with the ramp-up trajectory that we’ve given previously this year and next year — namely, reaching rate 75 on the A320 in 2027, rate 12 on the A350 in 2028, and rate 5 on the A330 in 2029, as far as I remember. The only change is a slightly lower rate on the A220 for next year. We’re in the steep ramp-up on the A220, and we now target reaching rate 12 for next year, which is still a very steep ramp-up. We believe this is the best balance among the different constraints we have next year, and a lot of work actually on the A220 to get there by next year, including the integration of the wings and other work packages that will come from the integration of Spirit AeroSystems.

Ross Law

analyst
#44

Alright, thank you, Guillaume.

Operator

operator
#45

Much appreciated. Moving on, our following question is from Chloé Lemarié of Jefferies — the floor is yours.

Chloé Lemarié

analyst
#46

Yes, good evening, Guillaume, Thomas, and Hélène. Thanks for taking my question. My first one concerns the maintenance guidance. For Q4, it looks fairly conservative considering the delivery growth we expect. I realize tariffs represent a headwind, but are there other moving pieces you could share so we can better grasp the building blocks for Q4 year-on-year? On the second one, Guillaume, I believe you said on the press call that gliders were at half their prior level. Could you clarify whether that reflects the end of Q3 or a more recent point, and perhaps compare the situation for LEAP-powered versus GTF-powered aircraft? Thank you.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#47

I'll begin with the guidance, and I'll keep doing that, starting from the $4.1 billion for the nine months. In Q4 of last year, we recorded $2.6 billion. Clearly, volume is giving us a positive effect. If all the deliveries come through, you can attribute roughly half a billion to that. At least two headwinds exist, I'd say. Tariffs are the first, and R&D is the second. R&D should come in slightly below last year, in our expectation, but even so, Q4 R&D could still end up above last year's level. That headwind belongs on your list. Conversely, I do think Helicopters and ADS, the two divisions, might perform well, and that would be a positive. Putting those together would get me to around seven. Everything depends on the deliveries. As Guillaume said, this ramp-up is extremely steep, very much so. The teams are focused on it, and if we do make the deliveries, then obviously I think the financial figures ought to line up clearly with that.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#48

Thanks, Thomas. On the glider question: at the close of Q2 we had 60 gliders, and at the close of Q3 — so at the end of September, roughly one month ago — we had 50, 32 gliders. Naturally, this is a fluid situation, since our goal is to reach zero gliders by year-end. As I mentioned before, we still need engines to arrive over the coming weeks so that we can be fully confident we'll have what's required. The engine makers have confirmed they'll supply what we need in order to hit that zero-glider target and meet our guidance. On the LEAP versus GTF question, it's actually both. At this moment it's split between the two engine manufacturers, and I can't be precise enough. It's close to balanced between them — close to 50:50 between LEAP and GTF. Again, this is a dynamic situation that shifts almost daily, as we're delivering a lot of aircraft in these weeks. I can't be more precise than that right now.

Chloé Lemarié

analyst
#49

That’s very clear. Thanks.

Operator

operator
#50

Thanks. We’re ready for the next question, and it’s coming from Sam Burgess at Goldman Sachs. Sam, go ahead.

Sam Burgess

analyst
#51

Thanks. Guillaume and Thomas, I appreciate you taking my question. I have a couple. Thomas, could we revisit R&D for a moment? As I recall, you originally expected R&D to come in somewhat above the 2024 levels. I may have missed this, but what exactly is behind this reduction in R&D compared with what you first anticipated? Is that sustainable as we move ahead, or should we expect some catch-up in FY 2026? On the second one, I realize you'd rather not spend too much time on individual quarters, but your press release does specifically reference a less favorable mix on deliveries year-to-date. Do you think that mix will turn more favorable in Q4? Thank you.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#52

When it comes to R&D, we're about $200 million under the 2024 figures for the first nine months of this year. If I remember correctly, that's largely driven by our lead improvement program, where we're concentrating on what truly matters, while also having the courage to shut down certain projects that we believe just aren't delivering the results they should. So that's fewer external consultants, and less spending across a variety of areas. It isn't cutting R&D in the way you described, taking a lawnmower approach — it's actually very targeted and focused through the program, where we believe we should concentrate on what matters most to the company. In our view, that worked quite well. So although we did say at the start of the year that we expected R&D to rise slightly, we now believe that given the successes we've had — which we consider sustainable — we should end the full year a bit below the prior year. That still implies, as I mentioned in my earlier answer, that Q4 could see a modest uptick in R&D. Looking ahead, what hasn't changed is our expectation that R&D will grow in line with revenue.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#53

If you're modeling it, I'd suggest holding that figure steady as a share of revenue. Naturally, you'd begin from a slightly lower base in 2025, and after that, on the mix side, it basically comes down to the fact that we've handed over more A220s, and as you're aware, those carry a smaller margin than the best. It really just reflects all the ramp-ups along with the figures we've provided.

Sam Burgess

analyst
#54

Excellent, that helps a lot. Thanks.

Operator

operator
#55

Thanks. Our next question today is from Ian Douglas-Pennant at UBS. Please go ahead.

Ian Douglas-Pennant

analyst
#56

Good evening, and thanks for the questions. First, another one about the supply chain. Besides engines and the Spirit AeroSystems acquisition running behind schedule, are there any other trouble spots in the supply chain you'd want to flag that are driving the schedule changes you've mentioned today or elsewhere? Second, we've noticed quite a few A320neos being retired this year. I'm curious whether you have any thoughts on why that could be occurring, how sustainable you believe it is, whether these are, you know, edge cases, or how we should read some very young aircraft being retired. Thank you.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#57

When it comes to the supply chain, engines are obviously the chief focus of worry and attention. As was said before, the remainder of the supply chain is in fact performing considerably better than during 2024 and earlier years. I mean, notably better. Both how many parts are missing and how long delays run are notably improved compared with before. We still face problems and hold-ups with cabin equipment, interiors, and seats, and given that this segment of the industry has, since COVID or since the recovery following COVID, been sort of swamped by the mix of demand for new aircraft plus retrofit and life extension of products, that is probably a midterm matter rather than a short-term one. Regarding your question about A320neo retirement, I'm somewhat surprised, since that isn't what I have in mind; perhaps there is confusion with aircraft sitting on the ground owing to missing engines, particularly on the Pratt & Whitney side. That isn't something consistent with what I have in mind. Not aircraft retirement, as far as I know. We look at your question.

Operator

operator
#58

Thanks. We'll move on to the following question now. Our next question is from Douglas Harned at Bernstein — please go ahead.

Douglas Harned

analyst
#59

Good evening, and thank you. For the first question, could you give us an update on the A350? October deliveries appear as though they might be somewhat improved, though things have been quite slow. Perhaps you could brief us on how things are progressing with Spirit AeroSystems on the A350 interiors and on raising those rates. On the second question, we've now heard some cautious remarks from CFM about reaching 75 a month, most recently from Safran in particular. Where do you stand today in your work with the engine suppliers to make sure you can hit that 75 a month at some point, ideally by the end of 2026?

Guillaume Faury

executive
#60

Regarding the A350, our position remains unchanged from what we've communicated previously: the start of that ramp-up has effectively slipped by 12 months because of the problems and complications encountered with section 15 at Spirit AeroSystems. For 2025, we aren't anticipating growth versus 2024, though deliveries next year will be phased with a fairly substantial weighting toward the back half. The ramp-up therefore arrives later, and we believe we'll make up ground in the sense of still getting to rate 12 by 2028. The main difficulties and delays affecting us involve interiors, lavatories, and seats. That's essentially what is causing us pain on the A350, and it's consistent with prior quarters and even with 2024. As for the A320 ramp-up, CFM actually stands with us and has repeatedly confirmed that they share our view on the requirement for rate 75 along the ramp-up trajectory. That remark caught me slightly by surprise, since alignment with CFM is extremely strong.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#61

This year brought substantial problems for them, which caused quite a few gliders and late engine deliveries. They are making up ground, and once more I feel confident that by the end of this year they will be back where they need to be, so they can then meet the ramp-up path that supports us in 2026 and 2027 until we hit rate 75. I am not claiming they lack difficulties. What exactly the nature of that remark was, I do not know. Clearly they have difficulties, but when it comes to ramping up the A320 with the CFM engine, we are working side by side. That is at least how I see things right now, and it matches the meetings and interactions with CFM over the last weeks and months.

Douglas Harned

analyst
#62

That’s excellent. Thanks very much.

Operator

operator
#63

Thanks. The next question is from Ken Herbert at RBC. Go ahead.

Ken Herbert

analyst
#64

Yes, hello and good evening. Guillaume, Thomas, and Hélène. If I could, I'd like to shift direction and ask about the A220. Given where things stand on that program right now, the reduced delivery guidance still looks fairly ambitious. Could you elaborate on the difficulties with that ramp and explain what is giving you added confidence? It's still at 12 a month in 2026. On a second point, speculation keeps circulating regarding a possible third variant of that program. How do you see the investments in it and the potential return, given what appears to be a tougher ramp and some recent remarks about pressure on demand? Thank you.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#65

Thank you for that question. We're definitely in the middle of a steep ramp-up on the A220. The team already has plenty on its plate, and on top of that they now have to integrate the wings along with other work packages for the A220. That's genuinely a great deal of work to reach the point we're aiming for. We believe rate 12 next year strikes a good balance among the various challenges, the demand and supply situation, and the volume of work that has to be delivered. It remains a substantial ramp-up, but what this year taught us is that a rate of 12 next year — actually getting to rate 12 next year — is something we think is well within reach. Essentially, it all comes down to the quantity of work, everything that must be accomplished, the ramp-up. At both Mirabel and Mobile, we have two files, the number of variants, the different configurations we must deliver, and industrial optimization so we can speed production up to that level. As for the third variant, which also carries the nickname the Dash 500 — the first two variants being the Dash 100 and the Dash 350 — that's something we believe the program will need and will benefit from.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#66

Airlines and their customers want these variants, and on paper that looks like a truly competitive product. We've stated that the Dash 500 isn't a matter of if but of when. Our position remains the same kind of statement. Once again, we're prioritizing near-term work and the near-term challenges we must deliver on: the ramp up, moving forward, reaching break-even with the program, and absorbing the Spirit AeroSystems work package that will now fall under our responsibility. That's how we're viewing this year and the years to come.

Ken Herbert

analyst
#67

Thanks.

Operator

operator
#68

Thanks. We’ll take our last question now. It’s from Olivier Brochet at Redburn Atlantic. Go ahead.

Olivier Brochet

analyst
#69

Yes, good evening, Guillaume and Thomas, and thanks for taking the question. The first one is quite straightforward. Regarding tariffs, you mentioned a number. Should we think of the impact on gas as being similar for 2025 and 2026, please? Second, on space, on accounting and the deconsolidation you might be doing: should we think of a deconsolidation? Will it lead to some separation costs, please?

Guillaume Faury

executive
#70

Both of those questions are too difficult for me, so I'll pass things over to Thomas.

Thomas Toepfer

executive
#71

The first one is clearly straightforward for me — yes is the answer. Broadly speaking, the effect on EBIT and on cash is identical. That can be entered into your model regarding the space consolidation. Our task is to move from a Memorandum of Understanding to signature, and afterward from signature to closing. Being ready for closing requires us to carve out the business. As things stand, this business is distributed across numerous legal entities and countries. To address your question, yes, Airbus does have the job of establishing an operationally and legally standalone, separate business by 2027, which could then be placed into the new legal entity — something that will bring, let's say, separation costs that are not insignificant. In the statement on Bromo, though, we indicated those would align with industry standards. A normal number can, I think, be plugged into your models, yet given the scale of it for 2025, it is not insignificant. Our financial results will not be affected by that.

Olivier Brochet

analyst
#72

Appreciate that — it helps. Thanks.

Operator

operator
#73

Thanks, Guillaume. Thanks, Thomas. That brings today's conference call to a close. Should you have any additional questions, just send an email to Olivier, Victoria, or me, and we'll respond as quickly as we can.

Guillaume Faury

executive
#74

Hélène, I want to let everyone on the call know that you'll be taking on new challenges, still within Airbus's Financial Directorate, working under Thomas on the Commercial Aircraft team. Jean-Christophe Henoux will be stepping in as your successor. He's coming over from the Strategic team and takes over on December 1st. So before long we'll have J.C. — that's his nickname — here with us. Hélène, I'd like to offer you my warmest thanks for how much I've enjoyed working alongside you, for how thoroughly and precisely you've handled everything with us, for being such a steady presence on these calls, and for always being so available to our investors, analysts, and the entire financial community. I wish you — all of us wish you — along with Thomas, every success as you move into your new role. I'm certain there will be chances for you to field questions about what that job involves and what you'll be doing next. Once more, thank you, Hélène, and welcome, J.C., and goodbye, everyone. Thank you.

Operator

operator
#75

Thanks, everyone — that brings the conference to a close, and you're free to hang up now. Appreciate you being with us, and enjoy your evening. Goodbye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Airbus SE transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Airbus SE earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Airbus SE or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.