Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 9, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Real Estate Diversified REITs earnings 31 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Matt Partridge

executive
#1

Hello, everyone, and thanks for being with us this morning as we discuss Alpine Income Property Trust's operating results for the fourth quarter and the complete 2023 fiscal year; our Chief Executive Officer and President, John Albright, is here alongside me. . Prior to getting started, I want to point out that a number of the remarks we make today fall under the category of forward-looking statements as defined by Federal Securities Law. It's possible the company's actual future results could vary substantially from what these forward-looking statements describe, and we have no obligation to revise them. Details about the factors and risks that might lead actual results to diverge materially from what we expect appear periodically in the company's Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other SEC filings. Our SEC reports, earnings release and latest investor presentation, which include reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures we utilize, are available on our website at alpinereit.com. At this point I'll hand things over to John for his prepared remarks. .

John Albright

executive
#2

Matt, thank you, and good morning everyone. When we look back at how we carried out our plan in 2023, we keep shining a light on the value-focused asset recycling effort we kicked off roughly two years ago. Thanks to that effort, we've been able to move our portfolio into higher-quality credits, cutting the risk attached to our cash flows and creating the liquidity required for chance-taking share repurchases along with high-yield first mortgage investments. In the fourth quarter, most of what we invested went toward first mortgages and buying back stock, and we believe these chances offer attractive returns for the risk taken when measured against other choices available in the market. Over that quarter, we assembled roughly $31 million of first mortgage loan investments, and we picked up two single-tenant net lease properties as well, laying out $3 million for them. An initial yield of 9.2% came from our loan investments, and the properties we acquired produced a cash cap rate of 7.3%. Our biggest single investment was a $24 million first mortgage carrying low leverage, secured by 41 retail properties. Tied to that loan, we signed a fee sharing agreement with CTO Realty Growth, our external manager. Under this fee sharing setup, we get a share of the asset management, disposition, and leasing fees tied to CTO's management. The other loan deal we closed during the quarter was the senior mortgage, which directed $6.8 million toward acquiring and fitting out a 5-acre development in a strong Nashville, Tennessee submarket, anchored by Wawa and McDonald's. Although we expect the loans we make will stay a relatively small share of both our total assets and our overall strategy, they give us future purchasing rights inside our acquisition pipeline and act as catalysts for forthcoming partnership opportunities with sponsors. We also believe these loans deliver appealing returns for the risk involved, underpinned by solid tenant credit and sponsors holding strong capital. Shifting to acquisitions, we bought two recently built properties leased to Dollar Tree and Family Dollar, because we came across fewer attractive core investment options given that sellers were reluctant. Finally, on the topic of common stock repurchases, we repurchased $9.5 million of shares during the fourth quarter at an average price a bit above $16 apiece. The cap rate we effectively achieved on those repurchases exceeded 8%. That sits well above what similar fee simple properties in that market would show. And bear in mind, tenants with investment-grade credit ratings account for 65% of our annualized base rent, and at $16 per share our stock delivers nearly 6.9% in dividends. Across the full year 2023, we acquired 14 net lease properties for $83 million, at a cash cap rate of 7.4%, and we originated three 1st mortgage investments, committing just under $39 million in funding at a 9.1% initial yield. Of the base rents brought in through property acquisitions during 2023, over 66% comes from tenants carrying investment-grade credit ratings. On the dispositions side, we completed sales of 24 properties during 2023. The proceeds from those closings came to $108 million, with a weighted average exit cap rate of 6.3%. The gains realized on those sales amounted to $9.3 million. Across the entire year, the spread on our net investments — meaning the gap between what we earn on investments and what we get from dispositions — came out to an average of 159 basis points. So despite having only limited access to the capital markets, and despite rates climbing throughout the prior 18 months, continuing to recycle assets under our strategy keeps pushing cash flow upward. Regarding portfolio composition, Matt will provide more specifics when he delivers his prepared remarks; that said, because our 5-year anniversary comes up later this year, I thought it was worth taking a moment to highlight the progress we've made in reshaping the portfolio through that very same recycling approach. Since the company's inception, we've recycled roughly $600 million of capital, accretively selling off primarily office holdings and properties leased to tenants lacking credit, then redeploying those proceeds at positive net investment spreads. That has enabled us to cut OpEx exposure from 43% down to 0%, increase our share of tenants carrying investment-grade ratings from 36% to 65%, and boost the quarterly dividend per share by more than 37%. At the same time, our list of top tenants — including names such as Walgreens, Lowe's, Dicks Sporting Goods, Dollar Tree, Family Dollar, Dollar General, Walmart, Best Buy, Hobby Lobby and Home Depot — now compares favorably to numerous peers trading at far richer valuations. Turning to valuation, we currently trade well above an implied 8% cap rate on the real estate portfolio and at a significant discount to book value of $18.36 per share. Beyond that, we expect solid growth in AFFO per share for 2024, and the loans we've made carry a built-in chance to reduce leverage across the coming two years. Put plainly, we offer exceptional value right now, and we're eager to secure as much of that value as we can for shareholders — including the $83 million in value we see embedded here. With that, I'll hand things over to Matt, who will cover our portfolio composition, quarterly results, balance sheet, and 2024 guidance.

Matt Partridge

executive
#3

Thank you, John. At year-end, our holdings were made up of 138 properties spanning 3.8 million square feet, with renters active across 23 industries in 35 states — and, as John noted, 65% of our annualized base rent, or ABR, is now derived from tenants, or the parents of tenants, that carry an investment-grade credit rating. Occupancy across the portfolio remains at 99%, and the makeup of our largest tenants is mostly the same. That said, we do expect occupancy to rise in the months ahead, since we have executed or are working toward executing several leases tied to the properties that are currently vacant. FFO for the fourth quarter of 2023 came in at $0.37 per share, flat versus the fourth quarter of 2022, while AFFO for the fourth quarter of 2023 reached $0.38 per share, a decline of 7.3% compared with the fourth quarter of 2022. The biggest factors affecting our quarterly results were one-time costs tied to tenant credit loss and bankruptcy — mainly stemming from the 7 Valero branded Mountain Express properties we talked about on our third quarter conference call — along with the timing of investments and dispositions. Those drags were partly counterbalanced by scheduled rent escalations across the portfolio we own, appealing net investment spreads generated by our asset recycling program, greater interest income from cash and restricted cash held on the balance sheet, and reduced interest expense stemming from the year-over-year impact of interest rate hedges we had previously put in place. G&A expenses for the quarter came to $1.5 million, which includes the $1.1 million management fee paid to our external manager. Our G&A rose 4.5% year-over-year, driven mostly by higher state and local taxes and by increases to the management fee resulting from our net equity capital markets activity over the last 12 months. The present annual run rate for the management fee, before accounting for any assumed new equity issuances or repurchases, stands at $4.2 million. Looking at the full year, FFO was $1.47 per share and AFFO was $1.49 per share, which amounts to year-over-year per share declines of 15% and 16%, respectively, relative to the full year of 2022. As we previously announced, the company distributed a fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.275 per share, equal to a current annualized yield above 7%, and our fourth quarter payout ratios for FFO and AFFO stayed relatively steady at 74% and 72%, respectively. We expect to declare our regular quarterly cash common stock dividend for the first quarter of 2024 near the end of February. On the equity capital markets side, we stayed busy during the quarter under our Board approved $15 million share repurchase program, buying close to 595,000 shares of our common stock for a total of $9.5 million, at an average price of $16.1 per share. During 2023, we bought back almost 900,000 shares of our common stock for a total of $14.6 million, at an average price of $16.23 per share. And in January, we finished off what remained of the $15 million share repurchase program. At the close of the quarter, our net debt relative to total enterprise value stood at 51%, while net debt compared to pro forma EBITDA came in at 7.7x, and the fixed charge coverage ratio was a solid 3.5x. With no debt maturities coming due before 2026, the balance sheet has stabilized nicely, and total liquidity at quarter end — comprising cash, restricted cash, and undrawn revolver commitments — exceeded $187 million; last night's press release included initial 2024 guidance that mirrors how confident we are in the portfolio's quality, the year-over-year gains tied to the asset recycling John mentioned, higher fee revenue stemming from our fee sharing agreement with CTO, and what we view as a reasonably cautious posture concerning our present access to capital, anticipated activity in the transactions market, and the broader economic environment; entering 2024, portfolio-wide in-place annualized straight-line base rent and in-place annualized cash base rent totaled $38.8 million, alongside a run rate annualized interest income from loan investments of $3.2 million. For the full year 2024, our FFO guidance range is $1.51 to $1.56 per share. Meanwhile, our full year 2024 AFFO guidance range is $1.53 to $1.58 per share. When it comes to investment activity, our 2024 guidance is $50 million to $80 million of investments, subject to reasonable market conditions, and that investment guidance does factor in the possibility of additional loan investments. For dispositions in 2024, our guidance is to sell between $50 million and $80 million of properties, and right now we're assuming a net investment spread of roughly 75 to 100 basis points between our investment yields and our disposition yield. Last, we project our weighted average share count for 2024 will be about 14.9 million shares, and this accounts for the impact of finishing the remaining portion of the $15 million share repurchase program I mentioned earlier; we thank everyone for joining the call today, and now we'll open it up for questions.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#4

Matt, I wanted to ask a bit more about something you mentioned near the end of your remarks. That $0.05 range in the guidance — does it simply reflect acquisitions and dispositions shifting within it? Are there other factors worth noting that could take you down to $151 million, up to $156 million, or on the other side, affect the AFO range?

Matt Partridge

executive
#5

Sure. Acquisition and disposition timing accounts for part of it. Another piece that can shift things somewhat is whether we receive loan repayments. That applies especially to the $24 million loan, which is meant to be a liquidated portfolio, so interest income could be lowered across the year.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#6

All right. What's the newest update on the Mountain Express situation? Will some of that end up among this year's sales? Is the whole thing going to be leased back up — or just portions of it? What's your current read on it?

Matt Partridge

executive
#7

Sure. Right now we're talking actively with multiple operators. On 2 of the sites, we have 2 leases executed. Another 3 are in progress, and for the remaining 2, talks are at an early stage. Because our emphasis stays on tenants that are publicly traded or publicly rated, our expectation is still to sell them, though we're actively negotiating to get the entire portfolio leased within the near to medium term.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#8

All right. So when you evaluate the portfolio, what portion would you say are probable sale candidates right now, as opposed to assets you'd only part with if an exceptionally attractive acquisition opportunity appeared? In other words, are you essentially finished recycling most of the holdings, unless someone steps forward with a really compelling bid? Does the lowest 25% of the portfolio still figure as likely to be divested down the road? How do you assess the current portfolio relative to the portfolio you'd construct if you were beginning fresh with a blank page?

John Albright

executive
#9

Yes. I'd describe it as somewhat barbell-shaped; we continue to hold certain properties with very low cap rates that we might choose to convert into cash and redeploy into assets with higher cap rates, while also always seeking to improve the overall portfolio by divesting its weakest portion, such as Mountain Express. So we will aim to keep making the portfolio stronger still. But — that gives us two levers, one at the bottom and one involving some of the very highest-quality .

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#10

Alright. So considering the scale you operate at, bringing in just a single additional tenant or entering one new sector still shifts the dial for you folks; how are you approaching the mix of tenants and industries from here on out? Many folks seem to inquire about Walgreens sitting at 12% and Dollar stores, which you recently brought on a couple of this quarter at 14. Will you keep buying Dollar stores? Would you — is it possible — would you allow that to reach 20%? And regarding Walgreens, might that be something you'd consider selling off down the line to bring that exposure under 12% — what's your thinking on that kind of concentration.

John Albright

executive
#11

Yes. Good question. So over time, we will certainly aim to reduce our Walgreens exposure. We aren't rushing it, but we're also on the lookout for additional Walmart, Lowe's, not at home, but Home Depots and improving what we hold there and moving those credits up the rankings; however, locating the right ones is tough, yet we'll keep chasing them and enhancing the portfolio in that manner.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#12

So then, how about Dollar stores? How interested are you in pushing that higher?

John Albright

executive
#13

Right, we won't be — my guess is you won't find us pursuing acquisitions in the Dollar store space.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#14

All right. Then I have a few questions about the numbers. Which two properties did you dispose of in the quarter?

Matt Partridge

executive
#15

Sure. The first was a convenience store operating under the BP brand, and the second was a building with 2 tenants. It was a Bomgaar — actually, my mistake, a Bomgaars, a chain comparable to Tractor Supply, plus — the name of the other tenant escapes me right now, Rob, apologies; nonetheless it represented 17.10 of the whole picture, a negligible sliver.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#16

Alright, and the final thing I have, on the data side. Has the Board approved a fresh buyback program? If it did, how big would it be?

John Albright

executive
#17

Had that happened, we'd have put it in our announcement. So we'll keep watching how matters develop and adjust if the situation shifts.

Rob Stevenson

analyst
#18

Thanks for making room in the schedule. Enjoy your weekend.

Wesley Golladay

analyst
#19

I wanted to ask about the investment guidance. Is the buyback factored into that number, and if shares are at $15, would repurchasing stock be the number one use of Visa's capital.

Matt Partridge

executive
#20

That's a solid question, Wes. No repurchase activity is baked into it. It would come on top of what the investment guidance covers — and look, with a share price of $15, the implied cap rate is clearly above 8%; so in my view that's definitely a topic we'll bring to the Board to talk over regarding a possible new program.

Wesley Golladay

analyst
#21

Alright. And then, Matt, you mentioned signing a few leases, and I'm just sort of wondering, what's included in guidance for expected rent from leasing those properties?

Matt Partridge

executive
#22

We've got the 2 that are already signed, and that's all.

Wesley Golladay

analyst
#23

All right. I think what we're doing is attempting to construct the model, and then to construct dispositions within our model — I suppose, what's the overall rent upside? Clearly, you plan to sell them, but we need to place a — get it into the model, and then exit the — and then monetize those assets. So how much, I suppose, relative to the present run rate, how much upside do you have on rent from re-leasing those assets?

Matt Partridge

executive
#24

Yeah. So the present run rate takes in the 2 we've signed, I'd say, at this point, assume nothing; and then clearly, when those come to fruition, we'll report them, correct? We'll call it, 2 months until we do this again. And so we'll give another update at that point and update the numbers at that point.

Wesley Golladay

analyst
#25

All right. And then one final question from my side. What are you assuming for leverage across the year? And what effect does that have on your borrowing base when you look at the spread?

Matt Partridge

executive
#26

Yeah. So our assumption includes a bit of deleveraging, reflecting the forecast and guidance, and we ought to finish the year nearer to 7x net debt to EBITDA, which should align with the interest rate spread as we head into 2025.

Matthew Erdner

analyst
#27

So it seems like those loans offer fairly strong returns once you account for risk. Right now, are you mainly pursuing these rather than buying or selling properties? If that's the case, how much money would you folks feel alright committing to that approach? I realize you'd rather not do this kind of thing on the fly, but still, what level would you be at ease reaching over this 2-year stretch?

John Albright

executive
#28

Well, I'd say what you're looking at — that's roughly the ceiling for how far we'd like to go with the loans. So basically, what you'll observe is loans either getting paid down, or we sell portions of a loan in order to make new ones. So my sense is you won't see our loan portfolio grow beyond where it is.

Matthew Erdner

analyst
#29

Understood. Now regarding the deal market, what do you believe has to happen for it to truly pick back up? Would it be reductions from the Fed, or capital moving in from the sidelines? What's your take on that?

John Albright

executive
#30

Well, I believe you're beginning to notice — or we're beginning to notice somewhat more movement at this point. I think folks have been waiting around for a rate reduction while the elevated borrowing expenses as debt maturing starts to hurt more. And so people are simply reaching tougher choices currently regarding divesting assets they'd rather not part with, yet it makes plenty of sense because of costly debt and such. So largely within the hopeful group that since cuts appear further away, you're noticing additional movement within the deal market.

R.J. Milligan

analyst
#31

The majority of what I wanted to ask has already come up and been covered. I just want to know, John, about Walgreens. From what I understand, its credit rating is split — could you share your thoughts on that particular credit, and perhaps on pharmacy exposure overall, considering the trends we've been witnessing in that sector. .

John Albright

executive
#32

Yeah. Well, look, it's obvious they're in the news. The sites we hold are excellent spots, and clearly, with fresh leadership at Walgreens, the dividend being reduced, and certain divisions being divested, they will turn into a stronger credit, clearly, and the positive side is our sites, even if you brought in a different tenant, there's plenty of tenant interest out there for these locations. Two days ago I was with a developer, someone who builds prolifically across all sorts of different retailers, and these days you cannot construct a box for under $330. So — so you'll see tenants being extremely aggressive about moving into other tenants' spaces. So I believe the context is that plenty of tenant interest exists out there if you ran into trouble with certain boxes. So basis is everything. And I think given our basis, with the entire portfolio trading at $127 per square foot, we have considerable cushion there. So we aren't losing sleep because of Walgreens, though we will definitely be trimming that exposure.

Anthony Hau

analyst
#33

So during 2023, you folks are taking every correct step, correct? Lots of different efforts aimed at narrowing that valuation gap; yet the market isn't giving credit for any of that, correct? So which additional levers could you pull in order to narrow that gap during this year while also bringing leverage down? And how do you strike a balance between leverage, repurchasing shares, and expanding that equity float, say?

John Albright

executive
#34

Yes. I mean, look, should the stock keep changing hands at these enormous discounts relative to NAV alongside elevated implied cap rates and an elevated dividend yield, obviously, we will consider purchasing additional shares since we would be accreting NAV and truly delivering shareholders a robust total return, in essence. And so when you examine roughly where our trading stands against the comps, which you understand better than we do, we're attempting to sort of present a value proposition to shareholders, asking why take on greater basis risk and a reduced implied cap rate when identical exposure to IG could be yours at a considerably higher cap rate, a lower valuation, and a greater dividend yield. So that value proposition exists; we will do our utmost to convey it, yet the market hasn't embraced it, and afterward we'll consider repurchasing additional shares and divesting assets so that leverage stays unchanged. So it's fairly simple. This isn't rocket science. We've gone through this on many occasions and believe there are solid opportunities available to us. And so we'll simply continue grinding through it.

Anthony Hau

analyst
#35

So it kind of feels like a catch-22, doesn't it? Since I believe a big part of why investors aren't giving credit for those moves is that the stock's liquidity is — well, it's fairly thin, right, next to your other triple nets. So how do you strike a balance between, say, repurchasing shares and, say, preserving that liquidity for investors?

John Albright

executive
#36

Yes. I mean, we really can't — we can't really hand investors everything. I mean, obviously investors want everything. But look, we managed to purchase what, close to 1 million shares through — under our buyback. And as you're aware, the buyback programs are quite troublesome. I mean, we have — we can't really repurchase during certain times of days — we can't repurchase with certain percentage of volume in the — as shares are trading. And we certainly are price sensitive. So even with all those parameters, we managed to purchase 1 million shares relatively easy. So investors can purchase the shares; they just basically just — they just probably have a hard fast rule that, hey, if you're trading below certain amount of shares per day, we can't touch you kind of thing. So — but you can purchase the shares. I mean, we've demonstrated that. So it's for more of the value investors seem to kind of latch on which more long-term holding sort of investors seem to understand the value proposition.

John Massocca

analyst
#37

Regarding the disposition guidance, should we take it that some payback on certain of those mortgage investments is included in that guidance as it stands? And roughly speaking, what sort of repayment are you anticipating during this year?

Matt Partridge

executive
#38

Yeah, that's a fair question, John. A modest level of repayment tied to that $24 million loan we intuited in Q4 begins essentially in Q3. But we're discussing, roughly, 10% across the remainder of 2024's back half, so it isn't a significant figure. Our expectation is that it likely accelerates once we enter — hopefully — an interest rate setting that differs and a transaction setting that's more efficient.

John Massocca

analyst
#39

All right. And maybe what factors outside the company might shift that perspective, or make it come out differently from the guidance? I mean, basically, when we consider a rate environment that's uncertain, does that play a role? Or does it come down entirely to execution when it comes to selling down those assets in that collateral pool?

Matt Partridge

executive
#40

Yeah, I'd say it's a combination of the two. I mean, for that particular collateral pool, I'd describe it as a more active transaction environment, with pricing the borrower considers appropriate. But as for the other two loans, those are development loans, and once the tenant is open and operating, I think it becomes either a refinancing opportunity for the borrower. So clearly, the interest rate environment would play a part in that, or it's, again, an efficient transaction market where they believe they can sell at the right price.

John Massocca

analyst
#41

Then, taking a step back regarding the guidance, at the midpoint, the investments and dispositions clearly offset one another. Do you anticipate any timing mismatch between putting capital to work and recycling it? As the year unfolds.

Matt Partridge

executive
#42

For sure, there's going to be; our assumption is that everything evens out across the years. There are occasions when we divest before we acquire, and other times when we acquire before we divest. — however, the guidance presumes a fairly even-handed strategy.

John Massocca

analyst
#43

All right. Turning to the balance sheet — the revolver sits slightly above the total you've swapped, yet it appears to align with what's in the loan pool. Would it be reasonable to think that stays floating, at minimum across the intermediate term?

Matt Partridge

executive
#44

That's right. You can take it that this will float. Then, when those loans are paid back, we'll look at what redeployment choices exist in the market, and that review will take in possibly reducing that floating rate debt.

Operator

operator
#45

That wraps up the Q&A portion for today. It also brings today's conference call to a close. We appreciate everyone for joining in. You're free to hang up now.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.