Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 27, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Craig Siegenthaler
analystAll right, let's get started. Good afternoon, everyone. This is Craig Siegenthaler from Crédit Suisse. It is my pleasure to introduce Josh Harris, Co-Founder of Apollo Global Management. Josh co-founded the firm with Leon Black and Marc Rowan in 1990, and the firm will be celebrating its 30th anniversary this year. In addition to Apollo, Josh is also the Founder of Harris Blitzer Sports & Entertainment, a sports and media company which owns several sports franchises, including, most importantly, the Philadelphia 76ers. Outside of the business, Josh serves on the Boards of Mount Sinai Medical Center, Harvard Business School, The Wharton School of Penn, the NBA and the NHL. He is also the Founder and Chairman of the Harris Family Charitable Foundation. Now moving on to Apollo. Apollo is a global leader in the alternative asset management industry with more than $330 billion of assets under management. It has grown its assets by an impressive 6x over the last 10 years and plans to roughly double AUM over the next 5. The firm is also a leader in insurance and pioneered private credit investment. With that, let's begin. Good afternoon, Josh. It's great to have you here.
Joshua Harris
executiveGreat to be here.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystSo just starting off with that 6x AUM growth number over 10 years. It's actually pretty amazing and highlights how well you're positioned for the secular migration to illiquid ops. How far along do you think we are in the secular migration?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes, so I think you have to go sector by sector, but generally speaking, there's a long way to go. So if you think about private equity, which is $70 billion of our $300 billion -- roughly $350 billion of assets, private equity and all -- private equity used to be about 7% of pension fund allocation. This year, it will be 26%, right? So that is -- it's experienced enormous growth. And I would say that we're not expecting a massive expansion in private equity. We think that's sort of gotten to the point where it's going to keep growing but at a much slower pace. But where there's real opportunity obviously is credit, where if you add up -- if you look at the -- we're the largest in alternative credit at around $230 billion to $250 billion. And when you look at everyone, you're less than $0.75 trillion. And you compare that to bank balance sheets around the world of over $100 trillion, so you're really at a very small beginning category. And increasingly, with the Central Bank's quantitative easing, the public markets are -- it's really difficult to come by return. So you've got the 10-year treasury at an all-time low. And so insurance companies, LPs, everyone has this enormous quest for yield. And so people are quickly going into the private markets and try to find alternative credit, alternative real estate, sale leasebacks, asset-backed financing, anything they can find. And so that area is going to experience enormous growth and will provide significant expansion to our platform over the next decade or so.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystSo Josh, how does all the increased competition and record levels of dry powder, how does that not dilute the ability to generate double-digit returns? And how does it affect your ability to invest?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So if you look at -- again, you got to take it by sector. But certainly, in the context of private equity, we're investing -- we invested Fund VIII, $18 billion fund. Fund IX, we're a quarter through a $25 billion fund. And you might look at the public markets and say, wow, they have a 19 P/E and that's really above average. But when you go through it, the bottom 25% of the public markets traded under 11x, the top 25% traded 30x. And so that bottom 25% -- the markets have really changed. They're bifurcated. And public companies really are growth companies. Things that category killers, things that are easy to understand, they trade at very, very high multiples. Anything that generates cash flow that might not be growing or has a story about it trades at a very low multiple. And so we've done -- we've invested about $18 billion in capital over the last 3 years in these public to private, the latest one being Tech Data. Tech Data is a fantastic company. It's massive. It's got very high cash flow margins. Public markets didn't appreciate it. And so we're able to put together these funds at, like, literally 6.5x cash flow and generate very attractive private yield opportunities. We can buy a company at 6.5x cash flow, put about 3x debt on it to have it be less leveraged than the traditional private equity investment and then create a 15% levered cash flow yield. That might never be a public company again. Increasingly, the private markets are developing and kind of -- it used to be that there were 8,000 public companies. Now there is just over 4,000. And so you're seeing LPs, other GPs, very large family options are increasing. They want to own these companies that have very stable cash flow, like Tech Data, are very leverageable. May not grow that much, but you can bank on that 15% return. In today's world, that's a very attractive thing. And so ultimately, there is competition in private equity. We do have this all-time kind of dry high powder -- dry powder high. We have average multiples that everyone else is paying at 11x. But we're still kind of pretty focused and value oriented. And we feel like everyone else has sort of vacated that space. We think it's really quite interesting and sustainable. In the private credit markets, which is the other massive place that we play, it's just beginning. I mean, literally, as I said, at $200 billion-ish -- $200-plus-billion, we are uniquely -- we're the largest. We have the most investment professionals. We're certainly linked with a lot of permanent capital vehicles that -- insurance-based permanent capital vehicles with very low-cost liabilities. And so the asset-backed credit opportunities, yield origination opportunities that we can generate are very large and almost limitless at this point. And so that area, even though you've got a little bit of competition, it's just beginning. And so the 2 are different, but they both -- we continue to see the ability to earn above-average returns in both those areas. The reality is, if you talk to the pension system, they don't -- and you talk to the sovereign wealth fund, even though the public markets have generated 15% returns over the last 10 years, that no one is projecting 15% returns out of public markets. They're projecting 5% returns, 7% returns. The media and private equity -- the median private equity GP has generated about a 400 basis point spread over the public markets during the last 12 years. The top-quartile GP is close to 20% returns. And then our returns are in the mid-30s. I don't think that's -- that it's hard to project that being repeatable. But we continue to believe we can generate those 20% returns and the industry can as well if you're with the good players.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystJosh, post the C-corp conversion, there's a lot of new investors looking at the space, looking at Apollo, looking at your peers. What really differentiates Apollo versus your peers? Why should they choose Apollo when they're looking at which stock to buy?
Joshua Harris
executiveSure. So I think Apollo has a lot of unique advantages relative to our peers. I mean you start with our investment cell, we simply just have the best returns of our peers over the long term. And so we have this very deep value-oriented culture. And culturally, we attract really great people. And so there's other softer things. I think that we integrate across private equity, credit and real estate, so we have this integrated platform. And in times like this where there's a lot of volatility, that is very helpful. You don't have to have the phone all morning talking about kind of the information coming out, our portfolio of companies and what's going on there and the credit markets and how to move and take advantage of opportunities that might present themselves because people are concerned about the virus and they might be selling broadly instead of kind of really focused on the fundamentals. And so that integration allows us to be very agile and move across economic environments and shift the dial. If debt is interesting, we'll be buying debt. If equity is interesting, we'll be buying equity. And that seamless -- we don't have information walls. That seamless approach to investing is unique to Apollo. And then, obviously, at this point, $180 billion of our capital is permanent. That's a unique advantage. Most of our -- if you look at our management company, which is what drives our stock valuation, we have the most revenue growth over the last 5 years of any of the alternatives, the highest FRE margins of any alternatives in mid-50s, any alternative managers. And we have the highest percentage of our earnings coming out of these permanent capital vehicles, close to 7 -- over -- the majority of our earnings are now permanently in place. And we're uniquely linked with these insurance companies. So in essence, we're an asset-light Berkshire Hathaway. We view that as a real advantage, the strategic partnership we have with Athene and Athora. The reality is that the ability to buy liabilities -- insurance companies create liabilities, and then they have to create a spread of assets into liabilities. Our ability to create liabilities at a very, very low cost is unique in the industry. And so -- and linking that with an asset management capability provides us with the opportunity to grow that part of our business. Really, in terms of large-scale insurance transactions, we compete with Berkshire Hathaway. We don't really compete with very many other players. In the sort of smaller transactions, certainly, a couple of the alternative firms are getting into it. So all of these things make us unique, and we're looking forward to the next decade growing our platform.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystSo your C-corp conversion has been very well received by the markets, by investors. What are your thoughts on maybe going another step further and getting potentially added to several other larger indexes like the Russell 1000, S&P 500?
Joshua Harris
executiveRight. So we want to become -- look, we have a great company. We have a great franchise. We've been in business 30 years, very -- a lot of longevity of the team and all the attributes we talked about. We want to be increasingly a great stock to own. And in order to be a great stock to own, you need to be easy to own for the people in this room and the portfolio managers. And we recognize that being added to indexes that they're tracked against is important from their point of view. And so we're very focused on getting -- expanding the index inclusion for Apollo. If you look at -- when we C-corp converted, our long-only and passive ownership went from 30% to 55%. We think that's got a long way to go. And the next index that we're very focused on is Russell. Russell decides in May who to include, and they're very technical requirements. And we're very focused on making the changes that we need to make to be included in Russell in May. And we think that will significantly expand our long-only and passive ownership and the ability of the shareholders in this room to own our stock. I mean, obviously, S&P -- so that's Russell, and I think that's next up, and we're very focused on it. S&P, we would expect over time that -- financial services is underweighted in the context of S&P. Alternatives, there are no alternatives included. When you look at the market caps, some of the alternatives are getting quite large. And so logically, you would expect alternatives firms to move into S&P. S&P has a committee process where they decide. You have to make some changes to your corporate structure. But we're going to look -- once we get into Russell, which we're hoping to do in the short run, we're going to look towards S&P next.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystAt the Investor Day, you provided a 5-year AUM target of $600 billion. You're among your peers -- you're unique among your peers in contributing a lot of that to growth in the insurance business. How do you see growth opportunities across your business, including insurance?
Joshua Harris
executiveRight. So if you think about it, we're at $330 billion today. We have between organic growth opportunities in the insurance companies, plus announced acquisitions like we have -- Athora is -- has an announced acquisition of VIVAT, which should add between $30 billion and $40 billion of AUM to our platform. And then as we've talked about, we raised the aided fund from our investors, which provides Athene with over $70 billion of buying power. So when we add all of that up, we would expect that between the aided money before acquisition that's already announced and organic growth consistent with past trends at Athene, that we would expand our insurance businesses a couple of hundred billion over the next 5 years. So when you look at the $330 billion and the doubling of our insurance business roughly, that would leave another $70 billion of growth to get to the $600 billion from the $330 billion. And we're growing our platform pretty consistently outside the insurance companies at $15 billion a year. So we look at it, we think that the $330 billion to $600 billion is extremely doable. And what it doesn't include is any new capital raising or acquisitions in the insurance business. And over the last 3 years, we've raised $12 billion of new capital, $4 billion a year on average, and that's provided another $100 billion of acquisition opportunities. And so we've excluded that in that number. It also excludes a stairstep in our noninsurance company assets. And if we look at the last -- we tend to stairstep our assets in financial volatility. And in the last financial crisis, we doubled our AUM. So we haven't included that in that $600 billion. Certainly, I don't wish any crisis on the world, but I think that our platform and our investors is very agile and people look to us. And we're one of the few people. We probably did brought more debt during the financial crisis than anyone else. So there is volatility, we'll expand our platform. And lastly, that excludes any acquisitions that Apollo might make. And so when I look at the $600 billion, I see that as a conservative case that is achievable just based on our existing trends and our existing capital and excludes all this other stuff.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystSo in light of those growth opportunities and some of the goals you've set out for Apollo, what is your current thought on the stock valuation, which has actually gotten a little cheaper?
Joshua Harris
executiveWell, as the second largest shareholder, I'm pretty frustrated. I think that we are looking at the stock and saying, at $43, $44 a share, we have $7 of cash and marketable securities net of debt on our books. And so when you subtract that out -- that's Athene stock. It's cash. It's other marketable securities. And so when you subtract that out, you're at $36. And we divide it by 2, and so we're at an 18 P/E. So ignoring any value for the incentive company -- people like to talk a lot about the incentive company. But just ignore it, assume it's worth 0, we're trading at 18x. And we compare that to some of our peers, which trade 5 to 10 multiple points above that, and they're given value for the incentive company. If you start to include the value of the incentive company, that 5 to 10 multiple point discount goes up to more like 7 to 8 to 13. So in other words, ignoring the incentive company, which we think will deliver real value to our shareholders, we trade at a discount. So it's hard for us to really make sense of it. And therefore, as the fastest-growing management company, as the one with the highest margin, as the one with all these growth opportunities and this unique strategy, we don't really see it. The incentive company itself is largely based on -- the majority of that's going to be Fund VIII, our flagship private equity fund. That fund is doing great. It's marked at 1.6x cost. It's largely unrealized. It accreted last year at 24%. And we would expect that fund to realize more than 2x its original investment. So we still think there's upside. And if -- and we can't predict exactly when that will happen. I mean, obviously, it's market dependent, but over a cycle, we would expect that to happen. And the portfolio is maturing and doing quite well. And so as we said and as is posted on our -- in our investor deck, and as we said at Investor Day, we would expect $1.50 to $2 per share on average to flow from the incentive earnings. And you can -- if you discount that, as we did in our investor deck, that would create $10 to $15 additional value. But even if you just ignore that and start to value us more like our more productive peers, you've got a lot of upside in the stock. And so we're wrestling with all these things and really in dialogue with every one of you in this firm in trying to figure out how we get our story across to you so that the value that we see is recognized.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystSo you hit on this briefly in the last response. But can you give us an update on the realization pipeline on Fund VIII? And what gives you confidence that the MOIC will be eventually higher than 2x?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes. So I think, ultimately, the timing is hard to predict. But I think that we believe -- we know the underlying companies. If you look back at all of our previous funds, including the one that was invested just before the financial crisis, they all have achieved 2 -- 1.9x. I think one snuck slightly below 2. But they've all achieved more than 2x. And we literally go through each company, and we understand exactly the earnings trajectory thereon. And that 2x multiple is -- assumes no multiple expansion. So we created that fund at 6.5x EBITDA. And if you look at the adjustments and the synergies, the cost savings that we thought were immediately achievable, we created that fund at 5.7x. The numbers -- all of the numbers do not include any multiple expansion. We're marked today at about 6.5x. Every multiple point up, if we were to achieve it, would be an extra 400 basis points of return. So today, we're marked at 18%, 19% growth. If that were more highly marked, it would be 23% growth, and it's 0.2 of a turn. So we know where the fund is going based on the underlying earnings trends and the debt reduction that's occurring and the cash flow generation. The multiple, obviously, is highly -- and the timing is highly dependent on equity markets and debt markets. And so the timing is uncertain, but I have a lot of confidence that we'll do exactly -- we'll do as good as we've done in our underperforming funds over the last 30 years that we've been doing this.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystJosh, what's really nice quality about your business, which I can't say the same for some of the other verticals that I cover, has been a lack of fee pressure. As you look in the future, do you see any factors that could actually change it?
Joshua Harris
executiveI don't, just because if you think about alternatives today and you think about Apollo as one of the leading firms in alternatives, we're in the high-growth part of the business. The traditional asset managers are under pressure. The quantitative easing that's going on all over the world means that the Central Banks are buying almost as many securities as are being issued. And so the monetary markets and ultimately the equity markets are affected by this massive quantitative easing. And the big institutional money providers, the sovereign wealth funds, U.S. pension system, the European pension system, they all want higher returns. They can't exist. If you have an 8% cost of health care, you can't exist on a 3% return in the fixed income market and a 5% or 6% projected return in the equity market. And so they're trying to get out of those markets. And so the alternatives firms are judged on their ability to deliver net returns. And the fact is that alternative credit, Apollo, had -- we've delivered 200 to 300 basis points of excess return over the public markets, and the top-quartile private equity managers have delivered well north of traditional equity returns. And there's confidence that they're going to keep doing that. So as long as we keep delivering, we're in this supply-demand imbalance. Like when we go out to raise Fund IX, which we did, we got $30 billion of orders. We stopped at $25 billion. Every fund that we raise, we are now in a supply-demand imbalance where we can't take all the money that's offered to us. What's constraining our growth is the ability to generate extra returns. What you don't want to do is take too much money and then underperform. You want to -- and so whether it be our insurance platforms, whether it be our ability to take LP capital, whether it's our ability to take private equity money, it's all constrained by how much we can invest and generate appropriate returns and continue to generate excess net returns. But as long as we keep doing that -- and today, there's very -- the fee -- there's no fee pressure. The fact that we don't -- certainly, we'll give discounts for size. But the ability to maintain your fees and your margins is there if you can deliver the right returns.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystPerfect. At this point, I just wanted to check to see if there's any questions in the audience. I have a few more here, but please just raise your hand if you have any questions. Okay. Front row up here. Just wait until we can get the mic to you, please.
Unknown Analyst
analystSo just a quick question. You talked a bit about the bifurcated investing environment. Are there any particular sectors or regions that you're seeing as more attractive than others right now?
Joshua Harris
executiveYes, sure. So I'd say, for us -- like, we're in a financial services recession. If you think about the 10-year being at all-time lows, the pressure that puts on banks and insurance companies here, in Europe, globally is extraordinary. And so whether it be buying insurance companies like Aspen into our private equity firm, whether it be the growth of Athene, whether it be the growth of Athora, whether it be like roughly a dozen banks and insurance companies that we own in Europe, in different sovereigns, the ability to, in essence, create solutions for large financial services companies that are under extraordinary -- whether it be Solvency -- and add to that Solvency II and some of the regulatory pressures that where the burdens of capital are being expanded, there's just a lot of restructuring that needs to occur for these companies to remain solvent. And we're known to the regulators and you see were known to the regulators here, we're regulated all over -- in many, many states, in many, many jurisdictions. And so we're known to be a solutions provider. And the fact that we have asset management capability, the ability to increase asset returns as well as the ability to buy huge packages of liabilities that are quite complicated is something that is a big advantage to us. So that's kind of one big area. Another area would be -- increasingly, is this yield origination space where the ability of us to continue to grow our insurance platforms and the ability of -- and the LP demand for off-to-run credit is highly dependent on, in essence, buying teams or companies that include teams, which allow you to securitize and create credit around everything from aircraft to trade finance, to consumer receivables, to a broad -- trade finance. So there's just a broad range of opportunities to bring on these teams. And so those would be the 2. And then the last one I mention -- that I'll mention is just broadly kind of public companies. I mean, again, I think the market is -- people underappreciate the impact that the index funds and this -- and there's a move out of the public markets into passive and index and alternatives. And so the active management in the public market is going. The value investor in the public markets is becoming Apollo and people like Apollo. And therefore, you've got this massive group of companies trading at 10 P/E or below that are great companies, and it's 1/4 of the market. And so that -- there's still this very, very large pool that -- trillions -- in the trillions that -- of great companies, just like Tech Data, as an example, that are there for sale. And so there's no real specific industry, but they tend to be a little more cyclical. They tend to be a little more -- there might be a hint of Internet disintermediation that the market is confused. But thematically, the public markets are deciding if those companies aren't worth owning anymore. And so the private markets are picking up the slack. Today, we have -- almost 8% of the U.S. workforce works for private alternative equity-owned companies and growing. And there needs to be a market for these companies. There needs to be a home for these companies. And so they're better owned in private hands with people and with firms that are working with them and appreciate what they do in the cash flow in place.
Craig Siegenthaler
analystWith that, we are out of time. Josh, thank you very much.
Joshua Harris
executiveThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Apollo Global Management, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Apollo Global Management, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.