Arecor Therapeutics plc (AREC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 12, 2026

AIM GB Health Care Biotechnology earnings 57 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good afternoon, and welcome to the Arecor Therapeutic PLC investor presentation. For our recorded presentation [Operator Instructions] Before we begin, I'd like to omit the following poll. I'd now like to hand you over to the management team, Sarah. Good afternoon.

Sarah Howell

executive
#2

Good afternoon. Thank you. Good afternoon, everybody. It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you for taking the time to join us today. And I've got Sarah Howell CEO of Arecor Therapeutics, and I'm joined by David Ellen, our CFO. And we'll be talking through today our half year results for financial year 2026, the post-period raise. So as you know, but just as a recap for anybody now joining us today, Arecor is the clinical stage by pet company. We're very much focused on developing superior therapeutic that can reduce treatment bird and improve outcomes, the people living with diabetes, obesity and other cardiometabolic diseases. Our focus remains very much on our 2 core product areas within diabetes and the oral delivery of peptides. In both of these areas, we're addressing or looking to address high unmet patient need in large multibillion-dollar market here. So within the diabetes area, we have best-in-class concentrated ultra rapid-acting insulins and I'll talk today a little bit of a recap for those that know you well and for those joining us for the first time today, why we're developing these insulins, what's the unmet patient need. And then currently the commercial opportunity that comes with that. But essentially here, we've designed these insulins to enable that next generation of automated insulin delivery systems. These are longer way, much smaller systems that can be used in a fully automated mode. And again, we'll explain what that means. We have entered into we're pleased to announce with the recent results, hardening discussions with multiple insulin pump companies that are now a term sheet stage, and we can talk about that a little bit more. And we continue to work very positively with SQL Medtech around 82%, that 5x concentrated ultra-rapid-acting insulin towards Phase II and also a very positive negotiations there with those next agreement. Within the obesity space, this is very much around the oral delivery of the GLP-1. And so this is a and GLP-1 receptor agonist here, and we're very much focused again on developing that preclinical base package where we're looking to improve bioavailability GLP-1, which would be highly translatable to other peptide should that be successful. And of course, I'm sure you all would have seen on post period and financing, we've raised GBP 1.3 million gross proceeds under this placing. And essentially, that was around strengthening the balance sheet cash through to the end of 2027 now, and that's strengthening although expanded partnership negotiations with multiple insulin pump companies and also enables us to commit to those key and critical path activities, development activities essentially to generate all data that we require to file an investigational new drug application for our Phase II clinical study. And that into manufacturing that clinical trial material so that we can move at pace into that clinical study alongside our insulin pump partners. So I'm now going to hand over to David just to talk through the half year financials

David Ellam

executive
#3

Thank you, Sarah. First half 2026 key financial session are the key lens of that. So revenue $0.2 million, reflecting both the process on the influence and also sorry. The 2025 sale of the royalty rights to Ligand. So largely that brought in over GBP 5 million of non-diluted funding and then third part this year by September, we bought in GBP 0.7 million of nonvalue funding. If you're wondering that doesn't appear in the income for this year, the GBP 0.7 million was accounted within the gain loss disposal in the prior year. R&D expense has increased from GBP 1.3 million to GBP 1.9 million, reflecting our increased spend on the incident, especially on 82-78. And then the G&A expense decreased from GBP 1.7 million GBP 1.5 million in the half as we look to actively reduce certain corporate costs. The guidance is at the Board expects revenue for full year of GBP 0.3 million and a loss after tax of GBP 5.5 million and also the ending cash at the end of the year will be about GBP 5.7 million. And then as we saw on the previous side, the fund raise license the cash on way December 2027 allows us to strengthen the balance sheet for all the partnering negotiations and then keep us on the critical path broad the Phase II IND-related cynical manufacturing-related activities.

Sarah Howell

executive
#4

Thank you, David. So I'm going to move into talking around our insulin portfolio, which is a process for the company. So I think as most you're aware with helping portfolio of incidents here and what we've been able to demonstrate is with our technology, where we're taking existing insulin, we developed novel formulations also insulin to enhance that profile. So essentially here, we're looking at accelerating the adoption of incidents is very fast as the insulin, even at very high concentrations here. And we've demonstrated clinically here from concentration from 100 units per ml, which were 247 candidates right through to 500 units per ml, which is 278 that we've been able to clinically demonstrate superior pharmacokinetic and photodynamic profile compared to those very best insulins that are available today from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk. So this is essentially we've accelerated that absorption of insulin and we get an improved glucose lowering profile because of that here. And the reason that we're doing this is this very much a need in automated insulin delivery system. So just a quick recap for our patients where a continuous glucose monitor as the glucose at any point in time. This is said to an algorithm, which calculates based on that meeting, and insulin is needed to keep that individual inside their target for the glucose range which is automatically delivered by a pump. These are very much becoming standard of care now. These AID systems, in fact, both of the U.S., the ABA and Europe, the ESC now have updated the guidance actually this year within 2026 to recommend the AID deferred treatment option the people live with diabetes, both Type 1 and insulin intensive therapy type 2 diabestics. So there's very much a dry to move people across the AID system. And the reason for that is that we see better outcomes for people living with diabetes festive 1 cost control. They're using an AID system. But of course, there are still some challenges that remain within those systems, and I'll talk about those now and why our insulins a best place and, in fact, the only insulin that can meet those challenges and meet the on that patient needs and help people transition across to these AID systems. So essentially, when we look at insulin, the challenge here is as you concentrate up insulin, it slows down its absorption profile. So slower to absorb into the body and be available for blouse lowering. And we've seen that and we've demonstrated that clinically in head-to-head studies as well. And we've overcome this challenge, and we've overcome that from any concentration from 100 units to now over to 500 units per note. So very much looking at our insulin portfolio here as a platform approach. We bracketed these concentrations. So essentially, we can demonstrate this superiority of any concentration units are now and 500 units per now. And you would have noted certainly within our results within the presentation today. We've incorporated AT 290 into our portfolio and into our product pipeline here, which is a 2x concentrated insulin essentially 2x the concentration of 24/7, and we can talk about that a little bit more so we talked about the fact that AID systems are better for patients. They receive better outcomes, but we still see relatively low adoption here in the U.S. where the adoption is great. There's still only around 40% of people with type 1 diabetes and only 5% of people type 2 diabetes are using these AID system and the simple fact here is why more people not using these AID systems is that there's still too much work to use. There's too much in pace that's required in decisions that are needed to be made of those patients and by the patients and too much interaction with the AID system. What patients are looking for is they want pumps that they can work longer this may sound relatively straightforward here, but this is around when you are using these pumps and applying these pumps. The standard of care at the moment is that they went for 3 days. That means at the end of 3 days, you have to refill your incident cartridge, the renewing come right there and disclosing those, if that's base pump refilling another pump with insulin applying that aging infusion site. And this is something that has to be done every 3 days. If you can extern that for 7 days or longer, that obviously reduces the amount of time that the patient has to go through these processes and steps and this is alongside everything else that they need to do to manage disease. And they also want these pumps to be smaller. They're a very visible indicator that you're living with a chronic disease and you're wearing them on your skin. The move is very much towards wearable patch pump here, that's where the -- what the patients are looking for, it's where the industry is going and everybody wants these to be as small as possible. So if you want to work hamper longer and you want them to be very small, it means that you have to get more insulin on board in a smaller capacity. So you need concentrated insulin. And then we come to the speed. We know that if you don't do anything special here, which is what Arecor has done as you concentrate up that insulin, you're going to lose the speed and you're going to compromise it on it a [indiscernible] profile and again, that's what we've overcome here. And because we have the fastest insulin in development even at those high concentrations, it means that we can help at a very best out of the insulin and the tune to these algorithms that we can respond more rapidly in real time to the fluctuations in blood code. And why is this so significant again, if we think about burden for patients is here the wearing these systems today, they're in what's called hybrid closed loop mode. This means that meal times where we see the swift rise in glucose the individual needs to count the carbohydrates and estimate the carbohydrates. Nobody does that accurately is quite impossible. They then need to tell the system that they're going to the meal and how many cars they're going to have with that meal. And this is all down from the speed of insulin because insulin today is just simply not fast enough to react in real time the swift rises in [indiscernible] so if you have a much faster acting insulin, this gives us the potential to stop having to count cars but having to tell the system that you're eating a meal. And this is ultimately the holy grail for people living with Diabetes an ID system is to move across what we call a fully closed net system to fully automated and no input and interactions required around those very important yield time. So a combination of a foreclosed system plus longer wear and much smaller pump significantly lower the burden for patients, and we can do this whilst maintaining and improving outcomes because of the speed of our insulin. So if we look across what is available today, there are no concentrated rapid or ultra rapid-acting insulin available for use in AID system the incidents that are approved today for use in these systems are 100 units amount. So that's the standard concentration of insulin. So with those, obviously, you can't enable that longer wear smaller pump and also we have the superiority around speed. The alcohol platform is very much focused on that next generation of insulins that are more concentrated in assets and we have both AP 290. So that's a 2x concentrated insulin. That enables us to unlock the standard of tariff 3 day were for people with type 2 diabetes. The average person type diabetes in the U.S. requires around 100 units of insulin a day and the very largest pump with the largest insulin cartridge can only hold 300 units of a standard 100 units concentration incident to essentially means that majority of the type patient population are makes even for 3 days were and have a mind to and extend it are. And then it also extends out the addressable patient population you can achieve Southern Baywest taking more of those type 1, divest 6 to 7 days were and, of course, enables us that leap into fully closed loop AID systems. And then if we look at AP 278, what that brings to the table here is not only does it further expand the addressable patient population that can get to 7-day [indiscernible] it also enables that future miniaturization of these insulin as [indiscernible] which is very much where the insulin pump companies are innovating. And looking at bringing the next-generation incident markets but they simply want feasible and be practicable for use without a highly concentrated insulin and just to show that in some numbers, I know you've seen these heat maps before, but I think it's a useful way of demonstrating this. If we look again is U.S.-based data, so this is using the very largest insulin pump cartridge in the AID system today, this 3 mill cartridge, you can see here the type 2 diabetics with standard insulin 100 units per mil that are available commercially to then stay in approved for use. Nearly 50% of type 2 can't make it a 3-day wear because they're simply not using AID systems and simply not gaining the benefit of improved control that we see with them. And almost all of them can't make it to 7 days wear. And you can see that we can get more and more of that patient population to this 3 and 7 day wear as we go through our U200 and new U500 concentrated insulin. But it's not just a type 2 problem. We see this with type 1 as well. We look at going towards that 7-day wear over the type warm patient population cannot get to 7-day wear. And then if we further miniaturize these pumps make these increments cartridges much smaller, of course, is further replaces this issue. I think what you've really seen over the last -- certainly, over the last 18 months, 2 years is a significant shift in innovation from the insulin pump company. So it's the insulin pump companies that are developing all of this technology and hardware, if you like, for AID. So they're all focus really on this opening up the patient population, making their systems lower burden and more accessible for both type 1s, but also increasingly importantly to the type 2 patient population. So they're focused on getting approval for type 2 and indication, and that's across the majority of the commercial pump. We now have type 2s on their label. They're looking at higher insulin capacity longer where 2 of the 5 pumps are approved. The 7-day where the challenge is, of course, getting enough insulin on board to really transition patients across to this improved 7-day wear and they're very much looking at improving their form factors we have on cash pump on the market today from Insulet, they'll be joined by both MiniMed and B2Bionex with their cash pumps in 2027. So we really are entering an era of innovation from the internal pump company, and we can see here there's very much in need for a high concentrated ultra-rapid-acting insulin for them to achieve their ambitions and to deliver this next generation of systems to the patient population. So if you look at that in terms of the size of this patient population and unmet need and what that translates over to in terms of commercial opportunity here. Again, we're looking at the U.S., there's clearly an opportunity and an upside opportunity outside of the U.S. as well. We have around 4 million [indiscernible] in the U.S. that are candidates for an AID system. So as all Type 1 and intensive insulin therapy type 2s as well. And also, we see around 1 million of these are people diabetes that require more than 100 units a day for the plant gets to the 3-day wear time and they're simply not using AID systems. And then of that GBP 4 million, around GBP 1 million are currently in these AID systems today, but they clearly want longer wear, smaller pumps full close loop. Again, they're looking at lowering the burden, but improving their outcomes. And if we take that 2 million patient population, which we see as those who have the highest unmet need for a highly concentrated rapid-acting incidents of ads. And that translates to an insulin revenue opportunity of around $3 billion there. And of course, there's additional upside as we see these insulin pumps further miniaturize and more of this patient population will require a highly concentrated its rapid acting insulin -- you may ask the question, but why would the incident pump companies partner with Arecor, what's motivating them to get the term sheet stage we asked to look to further develop and bring in our core insulin AID system to market. And if we really look at the opportunity within AID, clearly growing. It has continued to grow year-on-year still significantly underpenetrated as we spoke about, around about 4 million addressable patient population in the U.S. using an insulin pump or an AID system today. And in the U.S. alone, if we look now at AID sales, so this is the human consumable sales -- it represents around a $20 billion revenue opportunity for the insulin pump company. So that is all of the 4 million patient population moved over to AID that would be the revenue-generating opportunity. But really to do that, we need to deliver on these 3 pillars longer wear smaller plants and an enabling fully closed lead system, and it's only a highly concentrated in track that to insulin that can deliver this and our core does have the only instance that we're aware of in developments that meet this profile. So that's why there's a good synergy here and a strategic fit, the Arecor and the insulin pump companies. So if you just talk a little bit around the development and regulatory pathway here and I think as everybody knows, we conducted 4 Phase I clinical studies across our platform of insulin. So 2, the [indiscernible] which is our 100 unit per mill insulin and [indiscernible] units per new insulin here and this is covering both type 1 and type 2 patient populations, and we've also got data through delivery through insulin pumps as well. So this gives us confidence that we can demonstrate that superiority against those best incidents available today, we demonstrated superiorities across all of those clinical studies we had significant interactions with the FDA over the course of this year. We've had 2 key meetings. You can see on this slide, this is the Type C and the Type B meetings that we've had with the FDA, and that's really locking down our approach to concentrated in our platform approach, enabling us to leverage data across these different concentrations to follow this abbreviated pathway to market and really gives us significant confidence around our Phase II clinical study design. We've been with that clinical study design and our protocols are very confident that, that's what are the shape of our clinical study and the design of our clinical study moving forward there. And essentially here, we have an approach that we can end Phase II with either our 2x concentrated incident, which is A20 concentrated insulin, which is AP2. And for both of those, we can leverage our phase on clinical day go straight into the Phase II clinical study I'm sure somebody can ask the questions, so I'm going to answer it now. The selection of which incline move forward into that Phase II clinical study will very much depend on the outcome of the partnership negotiations with the insulin companies there and the priorities on concentration across those insulin pump companies because it's really important for our core that not only do we develop and insulin and bring that incident to market, we're really confident about the development pathway and moving forward the data that you need to generate to submit our BLA for marketing authorization. It really involves that the device and the AID system is developed alongside or insulin. So it is available and approved at the same time on market to be able to deliver a concentrated ultra racked [indiscernible] has label approval from Arecor incident at the same time. And that very much drive our decisions there. Now an additional question, I'm sure that somebody may ask here would be what do you need to form a Phase II and a Phase III clinical study of this size and magnitude each concentration. We don't believe so here, again, we've had very positive discussions with the FDA around our platform approach here. So we would expect that to bring a further concentration to a different concentration of patients within that 100 to 500 units to mil will be a small bridging study to this base package that you see here today. So there's a real opportunity to address the near and medium-term patient need, getting patients to 3-day wear, moving Type 2 patients across the AID system and enable that study closed loop and also then in the future to have those incidents available for further miniaturization of AID systems, very much a platform approach here. So if we look at moving forward to the outlook for the company, of course, we have our best-in-class concentrated ultrarapid insulin. I hope as we've been able to talk through today, you can see there's very much a high unmet patient need in multibillion dollar market, and we have the only insulin that can address the challenges and enable that next generation of AID system. It's very clear that that's where the market is going and where industry is going to what the patients are looking for and very much what the insulin pump companies are committed to you here. And as I said, we're in those team very much engaged heavily in those partnering discussions with also insulin pump companies here to bring our core insulin AID product to market a [indiscernible] stage now. So what's coming up. We're looking -- our intention, of course, is to partner with multiple insulin pump companies here to take our insulin forward. That allows us to bring an insulin to market that has a broadest addressable patient population like our incident to be available for use in as many AID systems as possible. And of course, that will allow us to initiate that Phase II clinical study. We'll be very busy doing everything we need to do to be ready for that clinical study and then we'll be able to select which pumps is that we move forward with and also have that way through beyond Phase II and beyond. So we have a laser sharp focus on our diabetes and insulin portfolio. And of course, in addition to that, we have an upside potential from the oral delivery of peptides. If we can be successful there and bring through significant value creation opportunities to Arecor and of course, value to our shareholders. I'd like to thank everybody for listening in today and be very happy to take any questions that anybody has.

Operator

operator
#5

[Operator Instructions] Sarah, can I please ask you to read out the questions and give responses where appropriate to do so, and I'll pick up from you at the end.

Sarah Howell

executive
#6

Well, there's quite a few questions, but just quickly scanning. I think a number of them are across the same theme. So I'll try and these without going over the same ground again. And first question is quite long, but I am going to try and paraphrase this first question. I think it's generally around asking around how the interplay between the SQL deal that we have previously announced what we have announced during the results this year around being in multiple negotiations with multiple insulin pump companies. So with respect to Arecor, as everybody knows, we entered into a co-development agreements for Phase II readiness with C4 Medtech in 2025, the back end of 2025. That is still very much active we are working very positively and collaboratively with Equal Medicare developing the data package that's needed for [indiscernible] so this is our 500 units per mil insulin. And in parallel to that very positive negotiations with scale medtech for further agreements to sort of Phase 2 and beyond. So that very much alive and active today and very much focused on AT-278 in addition to that, I think as we've spoken about today, it's been clear that there's also a nearer-term focus on AT0290. So that's our 2x concentrated insulin there and some advantages when we look at development and life size management of bringing the U-200 insulin market and opening up addressable patient populations with existing commercially available pump and ID platform whilst having 278 as well to further expand and allow that miniaturization of continue innovation that I think across the board, all of the incident pump companies are looking to achieve there. So in I think the next question was around are we moving forward with one or moving forward with both here. So in theory, Arecor has moved forward with deals across both AT-278 and AT-290, so that's our U500 and U200 insulin inside there. We will nominate one of these insulins for the first Phase II clinical study here. And the reason for that being that we don't need to repeat all of this clinical data on all of the clinical studies for approval of each insulin. So we'll be leveraging the data that we generate through our Phase II and Phase III program to be able to go for approval for additional concentration with very focused and abbreviated clinical bridging studies there. So we will essentially make that decision on which product we nominate to go into Phase II with based on the outcome of the partnering and deal negotiations across all of the insulin companies that we're discussing this with today. I think just following on from that, there's a question around how we confirm if negotiations with multiple insulin pump companies means more than I'm not sure it's based on her but yes. So yes, is the answer, short answer to that question questions so the next question is [indiscernible] quiet and is now resurface as A290 fleet amplify. Yes, that's a good question. And this is really around our platform approach here. So AT-290 is essentially 2x concentrated A278, so we are using the same formulation here in the same formulation approach we've simply doubled the concentration here. We can do this with confidence because we know that we can take the concentration up to 5x and still demonstrate that superiority of our insulin compared to Novo and these incidents approved the use today. And this is what also enables us to move directly into Phase II. So we could move directly into Phase II with 290 because we'll be leveraging that AT7 Phase I clinical data, we can essentially use that to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness so far on PKPD superiority of our insulin to move straight into a Phase II clinical studies for AT-290. So it's very much leveraging AT 278 that data is really valuable for us. Otherwise, we would need to run those Phase I clinical studies for AT-290. So it's allowed us to leverage that to go straight into or potentially into Phase I clinical study here. There's then a question really around market differentiation between AT-278 and AT-290. We've modeled this in a huge amount of detail around what's the initial addressable patient population for if we went with a 2x concentrated insulin and then how do we further expand that with a 5x concentrated insulin. What does it look like it's both concentrations of insulin around the market together. I think the answer here, and you probably see this first, I'm just going to go back actually to the heatmap line. You can probably see this best when we look at the heat map slide here. So if we look at the type 2 patient population, and if we see here that these AID systems we're going to go to 7-day wear plus, for example, then, of course, existing insulins simply can't achieve a 200 insulin to AT-290, which gets around 40% of your patient population to 7-day but you soon start needing 278, which is 5x concentrated into the story, of course, is quite different for a type 1 patient population. And this is because that they instantly the lower than the type 2. So actually here, 200 insulin gets the vast majority of our existing patient population to 7 days were. And that's why there's different pools really for different concentrations of insulin from the insulin pump companies and AI systems. It partly depends on the size of the cartridge. We're showing you here today for a [indiscernible] cartridge, Tandem and Insulet where were the other 2 or the 3 big players, [indiscernible] and insulate really big player. They have 2 mill cartridges. So this mix slightly changes and also depends on how smaller these pumps going to get, how miniaturize all the insulin pump companies going to go there and partly for them to make those development decisions and make those leads into miniaturization. They need to know that Arecor insulins are coming to market and they need to know that they will get access to them, which is part of the discussions and negotiations here around structures of deals. So the question around timing, essentially, I won't read the full question out, but I think it's essentially asking us when are we going to see the deal? And when are we going to announce the signed deal I mean it's absolutely our laser focus right now. Our focus is around deal with the incident pump companies. And these deals are looking at to what Arecor requires from these partnerships is development commitments from the insulin plant companies. We need to see that they are committed to developing their pumps and their systems. So that's both algorithms and their insulin pantry moving slides. And the pumps associated with these systems to be enabled that next generation. So we need those development commitments from the pump companies and their support during our clinical phases as well. And within those structures, we're negotiating and discussing the financials as well in terms of supporting and financial support across the development program on those clinical studies as well. So that's absolutely our laser focus. We're really cognizant of the fact that we want to do the very best deal that we can for our shareholders, but we need to do that in a timely fashion as well. So we extended our cash runway through to the end of '27 to strengthen our balance sheet, those negotiations but we don't intend to be running out towards cash runway on these deals. So we'll do them as soon and as quickly as we can whilst ensuring that we do the very best deal for Arecor and our shareholders. There's a question around exclusivity or the multiple partners seeking exclusivity. I think our core priority here is really clear. It's for us to be able to make our insulin accessible for as many people [indiscernible] diabetes as possible that is how the system works today. Patients have a choice on which insulin pump they want to use, which insulin they want to use, what algorithm they want and even staff of CGMs, which CGMs do they want to use a very interoperable system. We want to maintain that and of course, the enhancers for Arecor here is that we have the only insulin the only concentrated rapid-acting insulin that can meet these profile here, so would be the insulin of choice across multiple AID systems. So our focus here is very much on partnering more broadly, which allows broader access to the patient population, which you, of course, then also provides the greatest commercial opportunity and value-generating opportunity for Arecor. So I mean leading on to that is a question around who is the competition for improved incidents here we're really confident on this. We're really confident that we have superiority in terms of our PK/PD profile, the absorption of insulin and speed cost lowering action. We purposely gone head-to-head with the best insulin out there today. And remember, these are insulins all units per mil aside from some may remember our date for AT-278, where we also went head-to-head with an Eli Lilly product, which is human you had 100, which is the only other 500 units per mil insulin there. And we've shown absolutely clear superiority that our insulin or a much faster. So we're really confident on that. We're also confident that there's no other clinical days out there demonstrating that anybody else has been able to achieve this protocol. We clearly monitor the space very closely, both in and clinical studies, clinical data, but also IP landscape in here. So we absolutely have first mover advantage, we have very broad and comprehensive IP perfection around our insulins. The key for us now is moving forward at pace. So we take advantage of that competitive landscaping and position and leadership position that we have, which minimizes the risk course of any companies coming out self mode with an alternative approach or alternative technology to achieve this. The GLP-1 question next, but I'm going to come back to that. I'm just going to scan through for questions around the incident. So the next question is what is the business model for patients buying insulin. So again, if we talk about the U.S. at the moment, here, which is the commercial case that we've presented today. So patients are prescribed insulin by type and endocrinologists type 2s. It may be an endocrinologist for a specialist physician or a primary care position. But essentially, they go for a meeting with their position they're insulin prescribed there in that same visit and that to their doctors, they also prescribe their insulin pumps as well. So these are 2 separate prescriptions that very much prescribed in that same visit. So you can imagine if a patient has a preference for a small longer wear pump and that's what they're asking their decision to prior them than Arecor maintains this position, and we have the only highly concentrated ultra-rapid at incident. It will be the only insulin of choice. Try there for use in that AID system. So we very much have a halo effect here in terms of that prescribing an uptake and use of our insulin because they will be the only insulin that can be used in these AID system. And in terms of how they pay for and reimbursed, majority of those patients in the U.S. will be under some insurance. There so their payers and their insurers will pay that insulin. There are some co-pays that the patient is required to pay there as well. But Arecor approach here is about bringing superior insulins to market at no extra cost to the patient themselves and looking to increase those co-pays, for example there, and the rest of those costs are covered by their insurers. And probably important point to note is when we talk about this initial $3 billion market opportunity, we calculated this based on parity pricing to those existing 100 units per ml incidents today. So this doesn't incorporate any consideration for a premium pricing that our cause insulin here. So we've taken a low-risk approach to our commercial model. There's a question around any more technical work required for AT-290. So this is 200 units per mil insulin. I think as we've spoken about today, this is very much 2x concentrated at 247. It's the same formulation -- so in terms of also nonclinical days, safety data that we have there and clinic Phase 1 technical data will be leveraged and used AT-290. So we would intend to go straight into a Phase I clinical study and not require to repeat any of that data. And we've already demonstrated that with the FDA that we use AT-247 data our nonclinical plays, for example, an early clinical days to support AT-278 didn't have to repeat our abort go into the clinic for 278. And a question around how well are Sequel rolling out their pump there. [indiscernible] is a private company, I think as everybody knows, in the U.S., and they haven't themselves put out any public numbers around patient populations there and the uptake of their pump but I think what they'd be comfortable and are saying, and they talk about publicly as well, they're very much tracking there against their forecast. They're seeing good uptake of their insulin pump. And we're certainly seeing that as we see the commentary around the patient groups, et cetera, their Swiss pump clumps is being well received. And importantly, these will be strategically very much be the concentrated ultra-rapid-acting insulin is critical for that future expansion of patient population and to be competitive there with AID offerings on the market, which very much. It's in our core portfolio. So it's a question, just comment in [indiscernible] so the pump manufacturers maintain field sales forces. If so, would you not be better partnering with the pump manufacturer with the biggest sales force I mean it's an interesting question, actually. So in terms of the size of the sales force, if we look at -- if we look at how the patient population is split between the pump companies and also how those revenues currently are split between the pump company. Then very much Insulet tandem, I'm just going to go back, but you can see Insulet, minima in tandem are the top 3 players at the moment by a market share is not surprising. They did on the market for the longest here their AID systems and innovating for a number of decades, in fact, with their AID systems. Between the 3 incumbents here, the they have about 90% of the revenue and patient population by share and then we've got SQL and [indiscernible] it's very much new entrants to that market are building their market share. And this is within the U.S. here, they're building that market share here. In terms of size of the sales forces here, actually, I think we talked about this previously, Square really entered the market in terms of with an ambition to be #1 in the AID systems. They've got some technology around that as well as we know. But they also have launched for the full-sized national sales force. So the sales force has been sized as MiniMed and Insulet, for example. So they have a very large sales force. Our strategy here really around partnering is how do we get assets, how do we get our insulins to the broadest patient population you know that patients like choice here. So logically, that flows through that if our incidents are available in multiple pumps and multiple AID systems. We give ourselves the biggest opportunity to see the largest conversion of patient population you are insulin and that's very much our strategy here is to move forward with multiple partners. I'm just looking to see in more insulin questions for me to GLP-1. As I said, kind of broad question, I'll try and answer. It's which adds any news from ESD. So ESD is the very large, the largest European Diabetes Conference, which was held a couple of weeks ago. I was there alongside some of the Arecor team there. I think my focus and the reason I would say is very much to meet with the insulin pump companies in person or the senior team from the companies come to these big meetings, certainly have very positive and continued discussions and negotiations around what these partnerships look like, constructions, et cetera. So a really positive set of meetings for sure at ESC. I think the other piece is there's very much seen here at ESC that we're seeing through and you can see it through what the interim pump companies are announcing here get more patient population over to AID systems to move towards body flavor loops. So that means not announcing meals, not having to sell the system that you are eating. So that means you need a fast acting insulin and really around form factors. There was a lot around here that patients want patch pumps, and they want them to be as small as possible. So you could see there that drive it very much towards the systems that require quite frankly, in our core insulin there. So you could see about external validation, of course, that we're on the right track. So I think the last -- well, the last question for now, as is any more to be submitted around GLP-1. So the question is there are quite a few GLP-1 drugs out now? How will your differ from the others? So I mean, it's a really good question. It's a hugely competitive space and there's a huge number of incretins, whether they be, GLP-1 or a different form mode of action here, essentially for the treatment of obesity here with GLP-1 being one of those. Our focus here is really around the issue of bioavailability. So for GLP-1 for oral GLP-1 that are available today in the peptide path there is still this challenge is very low by availability so less than 1% by availability. So that's our focus here is can we use our at technology to improve by availability for GLP-1 if we can do that GLP-1 as a model pet type here, then the opportunities are twofold. Initially, it's around opportunities within that GLP-1 class. It's clear that what less than 1% by availability is significantly suboptimal, it's 99% of the drug load is not active there. So there are some commercial opportunities for GLP-1 in its own right. But more broadly and probably more importantly, is around its translation and to other peptides. There's a huge number of peptides in development today. a real drive towards wanting them to be orally delivered, but this bioavailability hasn't been cracked to date. So they all suffer from very low bioavailability. If we can crack that then that opens up partnering opportunities and transformational partnering opportunities with pharma for Arco and in the future, product opportunities for our core as well as leveraging that technology. Yes. I think that concludes all of the questions today. Thank you, everybody, for a comprehensive set question.

Operator

operator
#7

[Operator Instructions] And of course, the company can review all questions a publication responses on the Investor Meet Company platform. Just before redirecting investors to provide you with their feedback, which are particularly important to the company, Sarah I would like ask you for a few closing comments.

Sarah Howell

executive
#8

Yes. I think I hope what we've been able to get across today is we very much have a laser sharp focus on our insulin portfolio. So that means getting into that Phase II clinical study quickly, maintain that competitive advantage and get these insulins patients as soon as we can bring benefit to patients, but also you've seen this a multibillion dollar market opportunities here. So [indiscernible] priorities very much around finalizing these partnership structures with the insulin pump companies and then moving into our Phase II clinical development and that really provides us with the absolute best opportunity to generate significant value for our core and our shareholders. So that's our #1 priority across the business.

Operator

operator
#9

That's great. Thank you for updating investors today. Please ask investors not to close the session as you'll be automatically redirected to provide your feedback in order that the management team can better understand your views and expectations. This may take a few moments to complete and I'm sure will be greatly valued by the company. On behalf of the management team, we'd like to thank you for attending today's presentation, and good afternoon to you all.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Arecor Therapeutics plc transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Arecor Therapeutics plc earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Arecor Therapeutics plc or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.