Artivion, Inc. (AORT) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 16, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Health Care Health Care Equipment and Supplies conference_presentation 29 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Fang Chu

analyst
#1

All right. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on day 3 of the Morgan Stanley Healthcare Conference. My name is Calvin Chu, and I am part of Morgan Stanley medtech equity research team. It's my pleasure to have with us today, Pat Mackin, Chairman, President and CEO; and Ashley Lee, EVP, COO and CFO of CryoLife. So before we begin, here's our disclaimer for the event. So please note that this webcast is for Morgan Stanley clients and appropriate Morgan Stanley employees only. This website -- this webcast is not for members of the press. If you are a member of the press, please disconnect and reach out separately. For important disclosures, please refer to the Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. With that, Pat and Ashley, thank you so much for joining us today.

James Mackin

executive
#2

Hey, good morning.

David Ashley Lee

executive
#3

Good to see you, Calvin.

Fang Chu

analyst
#4

So just to kick off, for investors that are perhaps less familiar with CryoLife, could you spend just a minute to walk us through the story of the business and the market that you're in?

James Mackin

executive
#5

Yes. So CryoLife is a company focused on aortic disease. So we cover it from both ends of cardiac surgery as well as vascular surgery, so everything from aortic valves to aortic dissections where BioGlue, our surgical sealant, is used; to our most recently acquired product, the AMDS stent, is used in acute type A dissections. And as you work your way around the arch, we have a frozen elephant trunk for aneurysms in the arch. We also have an endovascular treatment through our partnership with Endospan for the arch. And then as you work your way down the aorta, we have a series of stent grafts for the thoracic, thoracoabdominal AAA down into the iliacs. So really, it's a company focused on the aorta, and the 2 main segments are aortic aneurysms and dissections as well as structural heart for the valves, and that's really the combination of all the products that we have.

Fang Chu

analyst
#6

Perfect. Thanks for that. So why don't I start here with near-term COVID-19 recovery trends? It seems to be the top of mind for everyone. So Pat, you said on the earnings call that the things -- things were progressing nicely, with July getting better after your April, May, June improvement, although there were some variances between resurgent hotspots, Texas, Florida and Arizona. So could you just give us an overview on if August continued on that improvement and perhaps what you've seen in the first half of September?

James Mackin

executive
#7

Yes. So when we -- at our Q2 earnings call, we basically disclosed our kind of granular detail around the month. So we did 62% of our prior year in the worst month of the pandemic, which is April. That improved to 78% in May and 85% in June. And we said publicly that we thought July would be better than June, and that was the case. And so what we're -- this is where -- this is the first we've come out with any Q3 comments publicly. We are currently tracking better than 90% of last year in the third quarter. So we've seen positive improvement from June to July, and that has continued through the third quarter. And we got a couple of weeks left to go, but we feel like the business is in very good shape. And I think you -- as you mentioned, these hotspots keep popping up, whether it's in the U.S. or Europe. It's just a constant kind of one step forward, one step back with the COVID pandemic. However, the fact that we're running ahead of 90% of last year in the third quarter gives us some confidence in how the business is performing.

Fang Chu

analyst
#8

That's very helpful. So you commented also on the back half. You were cautiously optimistic in terms of recovery, and you're expecting to see continued improvement in 3Q and 4Q. Are you -- sort of as of today, do you feel good about returning to sort of full normalcy in 4Q?

James Mackin

executive
#9

Yes. We actually -- and even inside of Q3, we've seen September has looked better, even more positive than the 90%. The big wildcard here for everybody, right, is what happens in the fourth quarter. I think we could return to growth in the fourth quarter if the pandemic stays as it is today. You've read the late press about what Dr. Fauci and the Head of the CDC is saying that the winter is going to be tough. So I can't predict the pandemic. What I can say is that you've seen how our business performs in the worst month of a pandemic. Our worst quarter of a pandemic, we did 80% of last year. So depending on what happens with the pandemic, if it stays like it is today, I think we'll return to growth in the fourth quarter. So I think that's your kind of your range of what -- where we think we'll be.

Fang Chu

analyst
#10

Awesome. That's very helpful. So maybe looking a little ahead to 2021 before we dive into some of the business items. So understand it may be somewhat challenging to predict 2021, but given your pipeline, you've expressed confidence in 2021 being a strong year. So on a perhaps comp adjusted basis, do you feel confident about 2021 organic growth accelerating relative to 2019 organic growth?

James Mackin

executive
#11

Yes, absolutely. And again, I put the caveat out there. I mean one of the tough things as a CEO of a public company in a pandemic is we haven't put guidance back out for the very reason of we can't control what this virus does. What I feel very comfortable with is, when you compare '21 to '19, which I think is the right comp because 2020 is such kind of a funky year, we've got 7 catalysts in '21 that we didn't have in '19, right? So we're going to be in full market release for the E-vita OPEN NEO, our next-generation frozen elephant trunk, in Europe and other markets. We're going to be in full launch of our thoracic stent graft, E-nya. We're going to be in full launch of our E-nside thoracoabdominal device. We're in full launch for NEXUS, our Endospan device for the arch endovascular. We just acquired AMDS, and we're already selling that product. BioGlue should get approved in China and PerClot should get approved in the U.S. I mean there's 7 catalysts that we're going to have in '21 that we didn't have in '19. So if the pandemic is not around, we're pretty confident we can grow double digits in '21 over '19.

Fang Chu

analyst
#12

Right. That makes perfect sense. I definitely want to dive into some of the pipeline products that you just mentioned in a minute. I just want to talk a little bit about acquisitions. So over the past 5 years, you've done sort of 5 large transactions, the most recent one being Osiris. Can you just maybe quickly run through for us the vision there, how it complements your existing portfolio and your -- how it complements your already robust pipeline?

James Mackin

executive
#13

Yes. I think, look, for me, I've spent almost 30 years in cardiac devices and run some of the biggest cardiac device businesses out there. What I saw as the opportunity for CryoLife, as a smaller public company competing against some very big companies, that we needed to set a stake in the ground on where we're going to focus. Focus is the key in a small company. And we focus on the aorta. And in the last 5 years, we did the On-X transaction, which gave us the On-X valve and now the PROACT trial. We then did the JOTEC acquisition, which gives us a full complement of stent grafts from the aortic valve all the way to the iliac artery. We did the partnership with Endospan that gives us the only endovascular treatment of the aortic arch, and that U.S. trial is about to start this quarter coming up. And then we just did Osiris. So we've literally picked up every kind of proprietary aortic technology that's out there in the last 5 years. And specifically to Osiris, I mean this is a -- we think it's a game-changing device. There's 50,000 acute type A dissections done a year worldwide. This is a devastating disease. The mortality rate is 1% to 2% per hour, and it's about 48% to 50% at 2 days. We think that this device will actually improve mortality. It will improve morbidity. And our goal, over the next several years, is to change the standard of care from the current standard of care to being used with an AMDS Osiris stent. That's a $540 million market at 90% gross margin. We start with Europe. We already have approval in Europe and Canada. Our reps are already selling. The company was on a run rate of about $3 million with 2 reps. We have 33 reps in those 2 markets. And then we're going to be working on running the U.S. trial and getting access to U.S., Japan and China, which will get us access to the remaining $450 million.

Fang Chu

analyst
#14

Great. It's a very helpful overview. So given the technology fits nicely in your existing portfolio, can you talk a little bit about cost synergies potentially? I think you've spoken to, commented on gross margin benefits. But what about other sort of cost synergy opportunities? Are there any low-hanging fruits, any quantitative comments you can share?

James Mackin

executive
#15

Well, most of the new products that I listed off, so NEXUS, AMDS, E-nside, NEO, BioGlue China, PerClot, most of those products, all the new products that will be coming out when they get to the U.S. market are 80% to 90% gross margin. So all of our new products are at a gross margin significantly higher than the company, so you're going to see a margin expansion just off the new product launches. The NEXUS device is currently at about a 70% gross margin as a distributor. But when we take that, if we acquire that technology after U.S. approval, it goes to 90%. AMDS is 90% out of the block, so that's one clearly. Two is our expansion in Asia and Latin America. As we expand -- so for example, we just went direct in Vietnam, we went direct in Thailand. We previously used a distributor. We cut out the middleman. Our end-user prices go up, our gross margin goes up. We also have cost-down programs in all of our different manufacturing facilities. So I think through the combination of new products, geographical expansion by cutting out the middleman as well as our cost-down programs, we expect to see our gross margin expand over the coming 5 years, maybe to about 1 point per year each year.

Fang Chu

analyst
#16

Okay. That's very helpful. So I think I want to segue into some of the near-term product opportunities you have spoken to, so these 3 JOTEC products in the near term, so E-vita, E-nside and then E-nya. So first off, is E-nya still on track for October limited market release?

James Mackin

executive
#17

It is. Yes.

Fang Chu

analyst
#18

Okay. Great.

James Mackin

executive
#19

And we've basically kind of -- we've got so many new products that we had to kind of titrate. We had the cardiac surgery team focusing on the NEO launch and the vascular surgery team focusing on the E-nside launch. And as those launches get underway, then we'll bring in the next wave of launches. So we're looking at E-nya starting in the fourth quarter.

Fang Chu

analyst
#20

Got you. And so how has the limited market release for E-vita and E-nside been doing? Do you feel well positioned for sort of a full market release later on in the fourth quarter?

James Mackin

executive
#21

Yes. And again, I think the pandemic -- launching new products in a pandemic is certainly new to me. I mean it adds a whole new complication. The nice thing about the E-vita OPEN NEO, that's a device that's -- it's an arch device used in dissections and aneurysms, so kind of life-saving type surgeries. We've had phenomenal response. We've done, I think, 30 cases already so far with that product. We just had the full market release to our commercial teams yesterday, so we're out and we're aggressively going to be going after market share. And that -- we have one competitor, and we feel like we've got a better product and a better sales force, so we're going to be aggressively going after share. E-nside, similarly, is a little earlier in the limited market release, but we've had a number of very positive cases with clinicians. This is the first off-the-shelf brand thoracoabdominal device in the market, and we're very excited about what that product holds. So really, our plan is to have -- with the E-nya limited market release kicking off in the fourth quarter, that we hit kind of January 1 full product supply, all reps trained and ready to kind of hit the ground running on all 3 of those products.

Fang Chu

analyst
#22

Okay. Great. Very clear. So I want to maybe dive into a couple other near term, maybe 2021 through 2022 revenue opportunity. Well, first off, PROACT mitral. On enrollment, can you just maybe provide an update on the latest on enrollment? Has it maybe seen a little bit of a delay due to COVID? But you -- it sounds like you still feel good about completing the follow-up period in December and maybe for a first half 2021 submission.

James Mackin

executive
#23

Yes. So as a reminder, PROACT mitral is the sister trial of the PROACT Aortic where we proved that we could reduce the blood thinners in half and reduce bleeding by 65%. PROACT Mitral is similar. Actually, by protocol, they run at higher blood thinning because of the nature of that disease, so it would actually have a more dramatic impact. That trial was fully enrolled at the end of last year. We're in the 1-year follow-up phase right now. And the issue we've seen is, I think many companies have seen, is just the ability to get your monitors into hospitals during a pandemic to check the charts and do the things you have to do to keep the trial compliant. So we think that may cost us about a quarter, we've been picking up as of late. But we expect to submit that PMA probably in the first half of 2021 for a 2022 approval.

Fang Chu

analyst
#24

Okay. So I was going to just follow up, so if we think about maybe 6 to 9 months of a process timing, do you feel good about it contributing kind of meaningful revenue in 2022?

James Mackin

executive
#25

Yes. I think 2022. And this is, again, when you look at the leverage of the organization, where that product is going to be -- assuming it may get FDA approval, we've got 60 existing reps in the U.S. They're already selling the mitral On-X valve, but they're now going to be selling the exact same valve with the new label. So there is no cost to the launch per se, except maybe marketing materials and training and education. We can also do the exact same thing in Europe once we get that through its regulatory approval and the same thing in Asia and Latin America. So this is a true global launch of a product we're already selling around the world with a new label and a new indication. So that should be a very exciting launch and I think what is the best mechanical mitral valve in the market.

Fang Chu

analyst
#26

Understood. Okay. So I think besides On-X mitral, you also have the U.S. PerClot PMA and then the BioGlue China opportunities. Can you just remind us what the cadence of the revenue contributions of those products are in terms of timing, order and then perhaps the materiality, if you can?

James Mackin

executive
#27

Yes. So by blue China, we ran a big trial there in acute type A dissections, which is kind of the killer app for BioGlue. We've been going through the Chinese regulatory process. And again, the pandemic has not been helpful. Our panel meeting was set for March of 2020. And obviously, we didn't have it because it was in Beijing, and it was done virtually. So kind of going back and forth with the Chinese regulators in a pandemic has been somewhat difficult. We are assuming that, that product will get approved in 2021, whether it's Q1 or Q4 will depend on how our conversations go with the Chinese regulators. We think that, that market is probably about $10 million. And how quickly we can adopt that is going to be over a few years, but we -- that's a very exciting product. There's nothing like it in China. The PI of that trial was the top aortic surgeon in China, so I think we'll get rapid adoption once we get that approval. So again, we think that's 2021. When it lands, earlier or late, depends on how the discussions with the regulators go. Next would be PerClot in the U.S. Just as a reminder, PerClot is a kind of powder hemostat that is used for oozing, bleeding after surgery. There's a couple of products in the U.S. market right now. Bard has Arista, which is now part of Becton, Dickinson; and then J&J has a product as well. That's about a $200 million market worldwide. The U.S. market is $80 million to $100 million at 80% gross margin, and we are planning on submitting that PMA probably in the fourth quarter of this year.

Fang Chu

analyst
#28

Got it. Okay. Very helpful. I want to move on to another clinical trial, PROACT 10A. Could you perhaps give us an update on the latest around enrollment progress? I think, enrollment, it sounds like it slowed a little bit. Has that maybe recovered since you last commented on it? And maybe what can you share with us in terms of the number of patients that have been enrolled to date?

James Mackin

executive
#29

Yes. So we -- when the pandemic hit, this was our biggest R&D spend. We had planned on spending about $6 million on this trial, so we proactively kind of backed that down by about 50% to around the $3 million spend just to preserve cash when nobody really knew about what was going to happen with this pandemic. I mean now that we've seen our business return to 90% of last year, we've got $65 million in cash with an undrawn $30 million revolver. We really don't have any need for cash and we're not burning cash, so we will start ramping this back up from a spending standpoint. The second part of this is hospitals were not exactly spending a lot of time opening up new clinical trials in the middle of the pandemic. So I think there were 2 things, kind of 2 headwinds we were dealing with: one was internally imposed by the reduction in spending, but second was just trying to open up a new clinical trial in the middle of that pandemic was not an easy thing to do. I think both of those things are loosening up, and I think we'll start to see more aggressive -- so I think we've enrolled -- we've got about 15 or 16 sites up and running. We've got another -- the full complement will be about 60 centers. We want to try to have those all up and ready to go by the end of this year so that we can actually hit kind of the ground on January 1 with kind of full enrollment, and we think we can enroll this trial in 2021.

Fang Chu

analyst
#30

Got you. So as you've mentioned, you're opening back up the funding. So it should be reasonable to see kind of a pop in R&D starting as soon as 3Q and obviously, 4Q as well?

James Mackin

executive
#31

That's right.

Fang Chu

analyst
#32

Okay. Great. And I think you've said that you've been enrolling patients through telemedicine. I think it sounds like the first patient was enrolled in this trial through telemedicine. What can you tell us about the telemedicine enrollment experience so far, advantages maybe, any disadvantages? And perhaps, has that maybe helped you organically save some R&D expenses?

James Mackin

executive
#33

Yes. So this is a very unique trial. It's a 1,000-patient randomized trial. 500 of the patients will have On-X valves with Coumadin at the normal INR, 500 patients will have the On-X valve with Eliquis. And what's unique about it, all these patients already have their valves. They're out walking around, and they're all being managed by Coumadin today. So the reason you can do telehealth is all you really need to do with the patient is have an informed consent with the clinician, tell them about the trial, the risks, the benefits. And then once they agree to sign up and do the paperwork, we send them the drug, whether -- if they get randomized, and then they get sent to drug. So this is like an ideal trial for a pandemic. We can actually enroll all the patients without them ever even coming into a doctor's office. So I think that's a real benefit and should help us as we proceed with the trial. I think the other thing is there's a tremendous amount of patient excitement about the ability to potentially change from -- if you enroll in that trial, you have a 50-50 chance of staying on Coumadin or get Eliquis, and there's a lot of patients that would love to get off Coumadin and have the opportunity to get on Eliquis. And that's one of the reasons we think this trial has a significant benefit going forward.

Fang Chu

analyst
#34

Got it. So do you think you can maybe take some of the teachings from -- or learnings from the telehealth enrollment on to maybe future trial? Is that something you're considering?

James Mackin

executive
#35

Well, the difference on -- most of our trials that are coming up, like, if you think about the NEXUS endovascular treatment of the arch or the AMDS acute type A dissection stent, those patients are going to have to have the index surgery, so they're going to have to come into the hospital and get a workup. They're going to have to come into the hospital and have the surgery. So it's just unique in this trial design because these patients already have the valve that we're able to do the telehealth. Maybe there are some things in the follow-up area, but I think that the big benefit is because of the design of this trial, that these patients already have their valves because the rest of these trials are going to require patients to come in and have surgery.

Fang Chu

analyst
#36

Got it. Okay. That makes sense. I think next, I want to move on for a minute to just P&L items. I think over the past couple of years, your margin has been somewhat steady, in the mid- to high-60s range. I think 2017 -- sorry, 2018 was 67%, 2019 was 66%. And year-to-date, you've seen some GM expansion just from execution of unit cost reduction. So perhaps talk to us about where you see gross margin progress from here on an underlying basis, perhaps in the context of Osiris integration as well as in the context of just maybe outside of that upside?

James Mackin

executive
#37

Maybe, Ashley, I'll let you chime in here.

David Ashley Lee

executive
#38

Yes. I think in the near term, let's say for the next few quarters, I think movements in gross margin are going to be more dictated by geographic product mix as well as product mix itself within the different -- various product lines, and the reason being because we obviously have higher gross margins in our direct markets in North America and Europe. And as those outperform, we're obviously going to do better. Same thing from a product line standpoint, if BioGlue or On-X does better relative to our tissue processing business, that's going to have an impact. But I think over a longer-term period of time, we certainly expect that our gross margins are going to expand, let's say, over a 3- to 5-year period, and that's due to a couple of different factors. One is that, and I think Pat mentioned this earlier, a lot of our new products that we're going to be bringing to the market are higher gross margin products, so that's obviously going to have a positive impact on margins going forward. We've got cost-down initiatives that we are implementing across the company. And on average, our target is to try to improve gross margin 100 basis points annually. You might not get that every year, but we certainly have that as a target. The other thing that's going to have a positive impact as well is this continued focus on direct markets and expansion into Asia Pacific where -- in Latin America where, although we use distributors, we have been optimizing even our distributor channels as well as going direct in select markets there, and that's going to have a positive impact on margin as well. So you go, let's say, 4 to 5 years out, we -- our target is certainly to be at 70-plus percent. But in any given year, 100 basis points, give or take. Some years, it will be better. Some years, it will be probably a little bit below that.

Fang Chu

analyst
#39

Understood. That makes sense. I think The Street is modeling you guys at kind of high 60s by 2022, so you feel comfortable with that.

James Mackin

executive
#40

Yes. I mean I guess in the range of...

David Ashley Lee

executive
#41

Yes. I mean we're at 66%, 67% right now and we're obviously expecting some improvement.

Fang Chu

analyst
#42

Okay. Perfect. And then on profitability, I think The Street is modeling profitability for the full year of 2021. So I just want to ask, kind of, a, do you feel comfortable with that sort of prospect? And b, what kind of quarterly revenue are you thinking is the right sizing for achieving profitability? Is $70 million of top line the right size for profitability?

James Mackin

executive
#43

So we -- I think one of the curses of a company that's been profitable for a long time is a lot of the companies that are our size have no profit or have never had a profit. We've been profitable the entire time I've been here. So it's like people want more, and we're trying to balance the -- accelerating our growth rate with taking some of the profitability down in the short run for a kind of a 3- to 5-year increase in profitability. So I think that's the balancing act. I mean we're already profitable. I mean it's not a when should we get profitable, we're already profitable. I guess the question is how profitable do people want us to be. We've chosen, in the near term, to bring down the profitability some to invest to accelerate the top line growth, to go from a single-digit company to a double-digit company.

Fang Chu

analyst
#44

Got it. Okay. That's very clear. And I think lastly, just on -- with the recent convert, it looks like your balance sheet is in a pretty good spot from a liquidity standpoint, at least for the near term. So anything you would note on balance sheet deployment, balance sheet priorities, liquidity front. What do you see? In the future, do you see maybe another raise down the road at all? Just any comments there.

James Mackin

executive
#45

I'll let Ashley take that.

David Ashley Lee

executive
#46

Yes. At this point right now, we're -- with our term loan B and the convert that we just did, we're carrying a little over $300 million in debt. We currently have in excess of $65 million of cash, a $30 million undrawn revolver. We believe that we have more than adequate liquidity to run this business going forward. I think going forward, we anticipate that we're going to be cash flow positive. And going back to your profitability question a little bit earlier, we think that in 2, 3 years, you're probably going to see some significant acceleration in drop-through down to the bottom line. But as we've stated and talked about publicly on several occasions, we're still not at scale yet, and we're building a company here. And so we're going to be investing in our channels in Asia Pacific and Latin America. You're going to be seeing some deployment of cash there. And you're going to see some increase in R&D spending as well. We've got a very rich product pipeline, I think R&D and clinical trial spending was depressed in 2020 for obvious reasons that we've talked about, so that's going to increase next year as well. But as the spending in our channels starts to plateau after a couple of years and we establish maybe a new base for R&D and clinical spending, once that's in place and we deliver on this revenue growth, which we think is going to come through, we think that you're really going to see a lot of drop-through down to the bottom line. But from a liquidity standpoint, we think that we're fine.

Fang Chu

analyst
#47

Got you. That makes sense. I think we're close to the 30 minutes. I just want to hand the screen back to you guys. Any closing remarks, we'd love to have you have the last word.

James Mackin

executive
#48

Yes. I think the final point I would make is we have been building, as Ashley just said and as I started, we've -- in the last 5 years, we've acquired 4 companies. We've changed this company significantly with the strategy, the investments we've made. We now have a pipeline that has 7 PMAs that have the revenue opportunity of $1 billion at 90% gross margin. I don't know of any other company of this size that has that, and we can fund it internally through our operating cash flow and still be profitable. We also don't have to wait -- as we just talked about, you don't have to wait for that 3- to 5-year window for the new stuff to hit. We've got 7 new items we're launching. We think we can grow double digits starting in 2021, assuming the pandemic is out of the equation. So I mean we're very excited and bullish about the company going forward. So I think stay tuned.

Fang Chu

analyst
#49

Okay. That's great. Well, with that, Pat and Ashley, thank you very much for your time. It's a pleasure. Thank you for joining us.

James Mackin

executive
#50

Thanks a lot. Appreciate it.

David Ashley Lee

executive
#51

Thanks, Calvin.

Fang Chu

analyst
#52

Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Artivion, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Artivion, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.