Ascendis Pharma A/S (ASND) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 15, 2026

NASDAQ US Health Care Biotechnology conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#1

Hello, everyone. I'm Max Skor, biotech analysts with Morgan Stanley. Welcome. And just to start off for important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com research disclosures. And with that, I'd like to welcome Jan Mikkelsen, CEO, Scott Smith, CFO; Jay Wu, Head of U.S. market. Thank you very much for joining us today, team.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#2

And thanks a lot of inviting us.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#3

Really appreciate it. So I think in regards to the Ascendis story, let's start with last night's announcement, you've recaptured full rights to the metabolic and cardiovascular franchise. How are you thinking about what comes next for Ascendis?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#4

That is an open question where I can convey a lot of answers because a lot of things is happening at Ascendis. First of all, we also had a press release yesterday related to buying back shares for $400 million and I think that is part of our integrated strategy that we laid out in our Vision 2030, how to be a leading biopharma and before I start, I think Scott would like to say a few words related to our financial positioning, how we are generating a profitable company and how will it progress in the next years?

Scott Smith

executive
#5

Thanks so much, Jan. As Jan mentioned, we announced a $400 million share repurchase agreement, and that's really on the back of the strength of the financial transformation that happened with Ascendis this year in 2026 going from historically R&D to having approval and launch of 3 highly differentiated products with YORVIPATH achieving blockbuster status this year. As you know, we've guided to over EUR 500 million of operating cash flow. And with the strength of the launch as well as the new launch of UBE well, we expect that, that could potentially double next year or even more. So it's a great time for Ascendis to buy back shares. And we still retain all the capital we need to continue to advance R&D. And in particular, I think with the other announcement we made, it gives us a lot of opportunity to basically ensure the growth of Ascendis beyond 2030 and to the 2040s.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#6

So when I see us in this -- and this laid out really well in our Vision 2030 because I really like this framework where we go out and lay a 5 years plan and how we follow on and how we execute it. So there's 2 cornerstones in our 2030 plan. One is to hit EUR 5 billion in product revenue. That is EUR 5 billion coming from our 3 approved product SKYTROFA, [indiscernible] and YUVIWEL. That is the cornerstone in our revenue generation and is coming from U.S. and also coming from our key effort we have to be independent on the U.S. revenue, but building up a sustainable part of our revenue flow the ex U.S. I think one of the few biotechs that really have this effort going on, where we're building up a global organization. We recognize revenue more than for 40 countries now. And it takes longer time in the ex U.S. segment. So when we come to '27, '28 we will see about 10 to 20 countries every year being full commercial with our product. Jay will a few words about U.S. because U.S. is still a cornerstone in our revenue generation and also explain a little bit of the effort we're doing really so we can grow the revenue every year.

Jay Wu

executive
#7

Sure. Thanks, Jan. As Jan mentioned, from a U.S. standpoint, we now have 3 approved products in the U.S. We're feeling encouraging about all 3 of them, right? So YORVIPATH, I know we spent a lot of time talking about given from a pure scale standpoint, it represents tremendous opportunity as you think about not only what it's generating in the near term, but also the longer-term potential of the hypoparathyroidism space overall. Within that, we've been investing quite heavily in a few areas. So one, we've talked a lot about prescriber education as being a key area we launched during a time where following that pair. This is a differentiated product, and we're reshaping people's expectations for what patients that have hypoparathyroidism need and what the condition actually entails. I think the second area where we've been investing quite heavily in is patient activation. If you think about 70,000 to 90,000 patients in the U.S. having hypoparathyroidism, this is a space where many of those patients are actively either seeking care, have established care with their specialist and/or are searching for something more above and beyond the conventional therapy that they're on and that takes time, but we're seeing some really encouraging signs of some of those behaviors and beliefs changing. And then lastly, with the ever-evolving access landscape, patient experience, we know that this condition in particular, these patients go through things like brain fog, they might go through fatigue and making sure that they have the requisite level of patient support both during their journey to get a prescription as well as post prescription is another area that we've been ensuring that we're supporting from a seamless experience standpoint. YUVIWEL, we just recently launched this year. You've seen some of the numbers that we've shared previously, incredibly encouraged by what we're seeing with that new product launch to date. And again, really speaking to the fact that this is a clinically differentiated profile. We believe is best in class. And from a standpoint of offering something unique to this community, we're seeing really positive sentiment across providers patients, patient advocacy groups and conversations with payers have all been going very well. And then, of course, we mentioned the cornerstone of SKYTROFA. We're still seeing continued growth in that segment tracking with what we see in prescriptions. And then because SKYTROFA continually being developed in other areas as well, we do see SKYTROFA as a foundation to start with a very bright future ahead.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#8

So what Jay has talked about how we implement an excellent center of commercialization in the U.S. with doing the same ex-U.S. building up a global organization where we want to reach basically more than the 400,000 to 500,000 patients, for example, with hypopara that is sitting ex U.S. huge amount of patients. And this is one of the efforts we will continue to doing. So when we talk about revenue in 2030 of EUR 5 billion. We have a strong fundament to achieve that just with our 3 current products. This is the fundamental hit by EUR 5 billion. This is not peak sales of this portfolio. The peak sales comes years after that. We continue label expansion. We have 5 to 10 trial ongoing now. Many of them are late states, both in label expansion, combination therapy really to build on further how to really reach the best kind of treatment to all the different patients. At the same time, and is coming to the second part is in our Vision 2030. How to be sustainable with a continued new growth of new chemical entity like one like SKYTROFA, like one like EUROpest, like one like YUVIWEL. And we have now a strategic strategy to take at least one new clinical development besides all the label expansion we continue to do with our current portfolio of products. And it's coming both in rare disease endocrine. It will come in other indication outside. And part of our strategic approach for 2030 is that we have built a new fundamental for a new [indiscernible] areas beside our rare disease endocrine. And we are not limit ourselves to rare diseases more. We have the capacity as a company. We have the infrastructure to move outside rare diseases. And when we see how we build up our rare disease endocrine. It was built on a product at least 3 where we add 1 product more after the time really have the economy of scale in synergies bothcommercial organization, in manufacturing, regulatory exercise really to do it, and we will do the same thing in a new terpotic era. We are not dependent on in-licensing. We are a company built on an R&D development on our strong technology platform with TransCon technology, which have given us 3 out of 3. Scott is still calculating what is the change to start with 3 preclinical and get 3 products approved. He still believes is very, very, very, low. And think about all 3 of them are highly differentiated. All 3 of them really showing best-in-class -- care to anyone. All of them are extremely durable. They have IP up to the end of the 30s in the 40s. They are a combination product. They don't have a patent cliff like a small tablet. They're just falling down the cliff 1 year after it basically in a position the IP disappear. We own the products. So we're not ending in like other companies that will royalty suddenly disappear the day after their IP disappeared, but the product stand for 10 years more. We will own the product because we do own commercialization. So when you look on the future of Ascendis Pharma. We're just in the beginning of the beginning. We're not even at the end of the beginning because the first therapeutic area, we're first starting to mature, first starting to grow. So this is why I really believe when you ask me this question. This is a long answer because we have so many possibilities. We're doing so many things, but I'm so happy to the stake we coming. We are independent in the way that we wrote in our Vision 2030, and independent meant that we are developing everything in our -- from the TransCon technology and be financial independent, and we can give EUR 1 billion back potential every year to the shareholder if we want to do that.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#9

Maybe if I can ask on the cardiometabolic effort or what it looks like going forward, capital expenditure does the base business fund the expansion? Should we think about any sort of equity raise trying to think about it through the lens of the share buyback also. I think are your bankers in the meeting?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#10

I think the bankers are a little bit disappointed. First of all, Scott is never getting right up to [indiscernible] bankers now because some were all of them have given up that we're going to raise capital. So we're not really interesting, no. We say [indiscernible] still being invited here. We are not going to raise capital, I can guarantee and when you see our company, how we are as a company, most people expand R&D expenses because they don't take product out. Hey, we take 1 product out all the time. And when it's out, they're not sitting in the pipeline more. We take a new one. So when I see the expenses on our basic research and development, we are pretty stable. We will have a growth every year will be dependent on inflation. It will be tendered on a few other element parts we are expanding a little bit more and other things like that. is not making material difference. Scott gave me a simple algorithm. If we go revenue 100% year-by-year, and we only grow expenses by 10% to 15%. Would that give a lot of profit. And Scott convinced me about that. And this is basically the story we are implementing for the time being. Should be not raising capital.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#11

I'm very happy you guys are here. In regards to the cardio metabolic opportunity, though, should we think about it as potential upside to the Vision 2030?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#12

Yes, this a major upside because I want to be independent. I have -- we have multiple collaboration. All of them have actually failed but we've been extremely successful as a company. I don't think anyone should be dependent on a big pharma that is really a big mistake. The first major collaboration we had with Sanofi. We made the first triple agonist once weekly, but then they got a new CEO, and he didn't like metabolic diseases. If that continue on that, they'll likely have been larger than really today. Then we basically made an ophthalmology with Roche genetic and went into a CMC problem, which we solved after that. But now we have [indiscernible]. Mark is sitting there with the CEO of Iconis. Our major spin up extremely successful. So the products are still fantastic. And then we have now a collaboration with Novo Nordisk. And in every contract, there is a way how to live together, how to work together. And one is not fast enough, we likely have a chance to go out of it. And I think we will get it back, it would give us a lot of opportunities, not only to have the best-in-class once-monthly semaglutide, but also have the possibility to access rare diseases in obesity and other metabolic diseases, which we couldn't do before to the same degree. So it opened up an extremely positive for us to really expand our opportunities in this way.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#13

I know it's early, but can you just talk about time lines and capital allocation towards this cardiometabolic effort?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#14

The capital application, it's basically are going to be in combined Phase I, Phase II trial, in which we will give you time lines on when we come to the beginning of next year. And it's not changing any way material our expenses in any way. So it's not going to be a driver of a new raise capital because that is definitely not needed from our side.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#15

Okay. Maybe pivoting a bit, let's talk about YORVIPATH, which really anchors your vision 2030. What are you doing to continue the momentum, potentially accelerate growth? What should we expect over the next 6 to 12 months.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#16

Jay, you can take U.S.

Jay Wu

executive
#17

Sure. When you think about YORVIPATH, transformational change from where you are requires something beyond just prescriber education, classic reach frequency, et cetera, right? Because 70,000, 90,000 patients with the number that you're treating, you actually need to get patients to raise their hand and come out of the woodwork. So a lot of our investments and commercial focus has been around that piece specifically, so I'll give you a few examples. We've been looking at direct-to-consumer education. You've probably seen some of that depending on the demographic and the shows that you watch or streaming online or however, but we are starting to see some preliminary positive signs from some of those investments that we've made from a digital standpoint. We've invested heavily in patient-facing roles. So we now have an entire infrastructure of roles that we call patient access liaisons -- they coordinate with patients directly. They support them in all aspects, whether it's field reimbursement, clinical education and essentially supporting them through their journey, both in terms of wanting information about the therapy, accessing therapy as well as supporting them once they're on therapy. And then lastly, when you're starting to think about digital infrastructure for more commercial stage organizations, how do you have channels increasingly embedded within one another, right? So from diagnosis to field personnel to nonpersonnel digital channels, how do you have them all work together in a way where you're offering people a seamless experience so that they get the information they need at the right and in the right way. So those are 3 examples for which we have been actively investing in activating patients more broadly. And again, we're seeing some encouraging signs, and it's really an investment and not just today but in the future as well.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#18

From the ex U.S. on the top level is to make more and more countries fully commercial. Today, we have about 7, 8 countries ex U.S. that is fully commercial. Next year, we will add between 10% to 15%, '27, and we will do that again in '28. So the overall perspective, besides each country have their own, you can say, execution of commercial operational execution is on a high level to get as money as possible country, full commercial where we still keep the value of our product because we believe the value we're providing with, for example, [indiscernible] providing creation not only for the patient, but also for the society, and this is why we not compromise really the value what it really costs to basically implement such a treatment in each country.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#19

Should we expect the investment in the YORVIPATH launch to increase over time? How does that look?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#20

I think we full-blown why we can basically be in this way, being in countries. We have a mixed model in ex U.S. in countries. We are down rate. We basically have built up all the legal entities to affiliate the basic people on ground in the countries where we have distribution agreement we are basically not responsible for any expenses in this. So out from that, you can say it's a mixed model where we basically have built the infrastructure supporting a global launch in all the countries that is needed.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#21

Great. And I know we have talked about the benefits of once-daily being able to hydrate with YORVIPATH. But can you give us any developmental time lines for the once-weekly TransCon PTH candidate?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#22

First of all, the once-weekly product is not an LCM activity. It's providing a choice to patient that it is stable on your patch. Meaning is that when you think about a patient journey, you come with a diagnosed of chronic hypopara. You are on conventional therapy with consist of 2 compounds or 2 treatment active vitamin D and a lot of calciium supplement. When you come out from convention therapy over to YORVIPATH, you have to go to a titration where you moved first, the actual vitamin D, and then you remove the calcium supplement and then you step up the Europac dose. And when you are stable on that, you basically can be in a position that you have a lifestyle where you're not changing your activity level, a lot you are basically have some of the same dietary component and other things like that. Compared to diabetes, one, if you -- everyone was somebody had the same amount of carbohydrate every day exercise in the same amount, then you will be really well on a stable insulin level. But if you change your activity level, get an infection or a disease, change your dietary component, you need to be sure you can titrate up and down. And there was a why. I got asked once you make SKYTROFA once weekly. You made TransCon CNP -- weekly. Why did you not make a [indiscernible] once weekly from the beginning because we know the complication in the titration phase. And that is not an antagonist to high level of PTH. It's not like insulin where you can take glucagon. You don't do that. There's only one thing to go to emergency room. So out from that perspective, if we know they're getting hypercalcemic, they just stopped treatment in 1 or 2 days and then they're down slowly, slowly again, and that's why we never wanted to start with a once weekly product. But if a patient has a more stable lifetime, or over a period, have a stable dose, and they want to go over on a once-weekly product, we will develop a one weekly product, which we're doing now that basically will give them the same properties that you get with YORVIPATH. And [indiscernible] replacement therapy because the once weekly is not an [indiscernible] replacement therapy, only have half of the effect they get the normal PTH. So it's not really a substitute for YORVIPATH, so forget that. So from that perspective, we want to have a once-weekly product, building up exactly the same active mode of action that you have in YORVIPATH with basic the same level of PTH 24 hours, 7 days a week. So it basically is bioequivalent with the YORVIPATH treatment.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#23

Great. Now let's pivot over to YUVIWEL well. How is the launch going? What could we expect in regards to patient ads through year-end?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#24

But see Jay, he looks such a happy person. I'm extremely pleased. I was -- she was always -- he's always negative, but when he saw all the numbers, he even -- they needed to be positive. .

Jay Wu

executive
#25

Yes. .

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#26

No, we need to be positive.

Jay Wu

executive
#27

Yes, we're very encouraged by what we're seeing. I think what we last showed again, we last reported 220 enrollments over 100 prescribers if you even take that comparing it to previous analogs, that's quite outpacing, I think, what we've seen in the past as it relates to incumbent or older therapy. So that's corroborated by not just, again, I said before, qualitatively beyond just what we're seeing in the numbers is there's just a high level of enthusiasm, right? A lot of patients that are on it. This is an ultra-rare community, there's a word of mouth. And I think you can measure a lot of leading indicators through being present, whether it's conversations with advocacy groups at congresses. And I think as you continue to see patients see their specialists throughout the year, knowing that this is an area where it's not like they just go in the next day. We do anticipate that we will see continued growth in an encouraging way from what we've seen to date. I also -- when you look at the space in achondroplasia specifically, it is very center of excellence based in terms of where the patient concentration is, which is very different when you look at it relative to like a hyperpara where it's much more diffuse across a right tail of accounts. So for achondroplasia, specifically, we've also been investing quite heavily in going on an account-by-account basis and understanding like what is the needs of each local regional account, which is a very different type of approach for an ultra-rare category versus something that you might see in PTH. So again, all these things, qualitatively, leading indicators, we're feeling really good about where we are and where we'll continue to be.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#28

Any comment on the mix of patients? Is this -- I know we talked about it on the earnings calls, et cetera, but new starts, switches, patients who potentially discontinued VOXAGO and testing? Any comments around that?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#29

Yes. I mean I think what we've shared before, just to reiterate, we see patients anecdotally coming across 3 segments. We have patients coming across patients that are currently on vosoritide that have switched over -- there's a second category of patients that were previously on vosoritide, but have since discontinued maybe because they weren't seeing the efficacy they wanted, maybe that from an injection site reaction, they didn't feel it was tolerable and they decided to discontinue vosoritide, but then wanted to start YUVIWEL. And then the third one, which is patients that have been holding out because they weren't convinced by the older therapy on market. Now that they're new option, they're like raising their hands like now I'm willing to try and want to try. I think with any type of second product coming in, you naturally should expect that probably there's a greater number of patients that have been on existing therapy that are hand raising to move over. So while we don't necessarily track that with specificity. I do anticipate that earlier on, we're going to get more of the patients that are previously on therapy. But anecdotally, we see it across all 3 segments. .

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#30

Any comment on gross to net over time? How should we think about that for YUVIWEL?

Scott Smith

executive
#31

Yes, I would say we don't usually disclose question that over time is probably the best way to think about it.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#32

Okay. and maybe if we could just touch on the recent agreement you signed with BioMarin. If you'd like to lay out any comments on that, I have a few follow-up questions, but -- we can go from there.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#33

The content of the agreement is that we will pay royalties in a limited number of countries until May the 2030. And it gives us a global freedom for all IPs from biomarine related to specific patents. And from my perspective is that we won the case in Europe. For me, it's not really what is right, what is wrong. I'm a pragmatic person there. out of 2 things. I actually prefer to pay to BioMarin instead of paying to the lawyers. At least, I feel a little bit better with that. So out from that perspective is the total win for companies in the way that BioMarin get compensation for the loss of revenue that we get in specific countries. And we have a freedom really to go out and really come out to as many as possible patients immediately and be in a position that we're really building up the franchise to what we believe best-in-class opportunity. This is an only product over that has shown really benefit beyond linear growth in a placebo-controlled manner. And also when we look on how we develop this fanship further on with the combination therapy, where we combine it with SKYTROFA, we basically will provide a treatment option to this patient group, first achondroplasia, where we basic -- can avoid basic all elements of surgeries, everything from spinal steonsis to lengthening like [indiscernible], like I'd, really key elements that really have a major impact in a negative manner on this patient's life. So from that perspective, we feel that we're making a complete new standard on treatment, not only with YUVIWEL, but also what that really being created as a possibility treatment option with the combination therapy. We now months data in the combination therapy, never seen results like that. You basically generate 3 to 4 years treatment in 1 year plus additional thing that we don't see the same effect as monotherapy, like arm length and other things like that. We're coming out now with the newborn data children for down to newborn. And we have the first data cut beat for the first 7 patients that came in. And it looked exactly as we had hoped for. But the key element is safety. And I think when we look on the safety perspective of the CMP based therapy is really providing no safety sickness. One of the safest treatment I ever have seen would give an obvious choice for their parents and the patients. .

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#34

Great. So the royalty agreement runs through 2030, as you said, how should we think about margins beyond that?

Scott Smith

executive
#35

I mean, at least from my side, you'll see there will be some impact in the quarter -- the next quarter we report and you won't even know where it is. It will be immaterial.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#36

But also I think the right as you're talking about is not a weighted basis over the global situation. This is the countries where we pay royalties, there will be a lot of revenue generating outside. So if you really will try to calculate an effective right rate until May 2030, it will be likely down in the single-digit numbers and not impact us in any way. .

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#37

Okay. And then over the next 6 to 12 months, what could we expect from Ascendis in regards to clinical readouts, clinical updates and just the story overall?

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#38

I think it's pretty well laid out what expect we see. I think from when I talk with investors, there's a lot of focus can we really build up the EUR 5 billion up to 2030. And I think a lot of feedback I get how will the next quarters. We came out with the perspective that we will have more than 1,000 patients every quarter going forward. And you will see that reflected in the revenue numbers, and I believe you will continue to see the loans. You will see YUVIWEL still continue to grow dramatically in this way. And what you see, we will see the expansion in our label expansion that will come -- results that will come 2 years data from our combination trial end of the year, there will be other element coming out from our portfolio. Next year, we will have 2 or 3 Phase III readout. And then you will see the new product opportunity coming with the new chemical entities. So I think we are building up a few things, continue the revenue generating at the same time, building on the sustainability on building new chemical entities that are really providing the next level of support to our sustainable revenue generation for the next 20 years.

Maxwell Skor

analyst
#39

Great. So we have 2 minutes left. Anything you'd like to leave investors with after the updates from last night and the discussion today. I think -- we're good. Ascendis team, thank you very much for joining us today. Really appreciate it.

Jan Mikkelsen

executive
#40

Thanks so much.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Ascendis Pharma A/S transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Ascendis Pharma A/S earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.

More tools for stock research

OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Ascendis Pharma A/S or any ticker on your watchlist.

StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.