Asker Healthcare Group AB (publ) (ASKER) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 21, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorWelcome to Asker Healthcare Q2 Earnings Call 2026. [Operator Instructions] Now I will hand the conference over to CEO, Johan Falk and CFO, Thomas Moss. Please go ahead.
Johan Falk
executiveHello. Thank you, everyone, taking some time of, hopefully, some vacation listening to Asker Healthcare Group's Q2 report. We are happy and proud to present a 24% adjusted EBITDA growth, out of which 6% was organic. this quarter. We're also happy to see a 10% EBITDA margin for this quarter. So that's good. If we take in a few highlights one by one, the net sales was SEK 4.7 billion this quarter, up with 18%, out of which 5% was organic. The adjusted EBITDA, SEK 471 million, up with 24%, as I mentioned, 6% organic and the margin, 10%, which was up 0.5 percentage point from last year. We have a good and robust both cash flow and efficient working capital. So our most important KPI, RK or EBITDA over net working capital was 69%. We work hard, as you know, with ESG and sustainability and MSCI rated us AAA for the first time. So that's also something we're happy to see, and it helps us winning tenders, especially in the Northern Europe, and it actually supports our business in a very good way. In terms of acquisitions, we had one new acquisition in Ireland in July, and we have passed 50% of our annual targeted acquisitions, which we will touch upon a little bit later. As we usually say, the best way to follow us as a company is on a rolling 12-month basis, and that's -- we had a target of delivering more than 15% of EBITDA growth. It's now on 21%. Our over 69% and our margin on a rolling 12-month basis is now steadily growing to 9.8%. Our leverage, as you know, important, staying under 2.5x, and we're now at 2.37x. So that's giving us some headrooms upwards. We usually show these pictures as well. We have had many, many years of good growth in this company, and we have hopefully in many years to come both organically as well as via M&A. And now we're adding another bar to derive in this picture also weigh about the 5% growth, which is good to see. I hand over to Tom.
Thomas Moss
executiveGreat. Thanks, Johan. Let's go into some of the numbers in a little bit more detail, but very much supporting the message that Johan gave there, continued solid growth across the group. So net sales in Q2, up 18%, 5% of that organic, as Johan mentioned, 0 FX effect in this particular quarter. Adjusted EBITDA, again, as Johan mentioned, up 24% of 6% organic, and again, no FX effect on the EBITDA line. margins at 10%. And for us, what's pleasing to see is that we do see more lending from all parts of the group, all regions and the vast majority of companies performing very nicely and the newly acquired companies coming in, in a way, supporting the growth of the group as a whole and also nothing to drive that margin expansion that we see when we look at the overall figures. If we look on the right-hand side of this page, we see the half year picture, January to June, also very much in line with what we said at Q1. As you'll remember, we had a solid Q1. We backed that up now with another good, solid Q2 report. And so we see the half year effect of that 7% organic EBITDA growth and 23% total EBITDA growth so far this year. If I move to the business areas 1 by one, let's start with Business Area North. Also a good quarter, performing nicely with the organic growth coming through, net sales up 13%, EBITDA up 10% and important for us to see that we're able to maintain those good margins in Region North above 13% on a rolling 12-month basis. Worth also noting we've talked about this before, the new distribution center in Gothenburg progressing well in line with our plans. And actually, we've started to drive some early early-stage operation activities through that system, which is going nicely, and we'll continue to ramp that up through the second half of the year. On the right-hand side, the half year figures, again, very much in line with the Q1 and Q2 stability and solid performance we see adjusted EBITDA growth of 8% net sales growing at 10%. Turning to Business Area West, another strong quarter in West adjusted EBITDA up 32%. Nice to see that the margin is also rising as we hope and expect up to 9.6% in Q2 and again, steady performance across the business area, very much in line with what we've been reporting from West in recent quarters. And also worth noting that the larger acquisitions that we've done invested in recent times also delivering very strongly and helping to support those scale business benefits and the growing home care business also driving that scale benefit across the region as well. And then our third region, Business Area Central a very similar story, actually, to the 1 that we presented on the other 2 regions, continuing the strength in the results, positive margin development. M&A is contributing strongly. So net sales up 33% in the quarter, adjusted EBITDA up 56% and the margin, again, rising nicely in quarter 2 to 9.6% and a very similar message to 1 that I've given on other regions and the group as a whole. Recent acquisitions coming in strongly contributing nicely to the overall region and the trends that we've seen in recent quarters. And at the half year, adjusted EBITDA growth in Central is now running at 52% net sales growth of 29%. A brief mention of our over EBITDA of net working capital. We always include this our key internal metric, as Johan mentioned, make sure that we're focusing on that right balance between profit and also efficiency in terms of how we deploy our working capital. So good to see that we're maintaining good strong performance on this metric. And then cash flow, I spent a little bit longer on cash flow in Q1. I will do the same again now given that we had some significant one-off cash outflows in Q2. The good thing from our perspective is that they came in exactly as forecast, which continues to show that we have good visibility of our cash flow and the availability of that cash flow, which is so important to driving our M&A agenda and enabling us to use that great pipeline that we have going forward. So the adjusted cash flow from the operating activity is SEK 330 million in Q2 good solid performance. CapEx, we continue to spend our biggest investment at the moment is the new warehouse in Gothenburg that I've mentioned very much in line the plan approximately SEK 75 million remaining to be spent on CapEx in that facility during the remainder of 2026. The significant one-off cash flows that I mentioned, both fully forecasted and anticipated. The earnouts, SEK 463 million was paid for company earnouts for deals that came to the end of their earn-out period in December 2025. And of course, the dividend, the fun we've paid that out. Cash conversion, I'd just add this as a note, it's not a KPI that we lift at the very highest level, but it's 1 that we actually monitor very, very closely internally. So good to see that, that's running at a healthy level above 80%. And then final note on cash flow. We continue to look forward. We continue to want to make sure that we have good visibility of that. And it's worth just once again reflecting that the large significant one-off cash outflows we had in Q2 this year, were something of an exception. When we look forward to 2027, the earnout payments are currently forecasted at a much lower level of only SEK 150 million. And then final slide for me, just a word or 2. On leverage, naturally and again, as anticipated, the leverage was marginally and temporarily elevated because of those large cash outflows that I talked about but still at a level that very much ensures that we can continue to have the capacity to drive the M&A agenda, 2.37 according to our external target definition but also as we talked about a little bit at Q1, there are other ways of thinking about leverage. So I also continue to present the alternative leverage ratio that we look at which is really equivalent to our bank leverage covenant, which means that we include all of the earnouts and outstanding M&A payments that are due in the next 12 months, and we also include the 12-month pro forma EBITDA from the acquisitions that we've done and that gives a figure of SEK 2.43 billion. With that said, I think I hand it back to Johan.
Johan Falk
executiveThank you, Tom. Okay. So let's look into the M&A part of our business. We have done 4 acquisitions year-to-date, and 2 of them ones are a little bit on the upper side of our range, SEK 300 million and SEK 350 million. So we have the last one, Murray Surgical was completed in July, adding some SEK 73 million in annual sales. You might also have noticed that we discontinued an acquisition in Denmark, Kirstine Hardam due to competition authority was dragging out in time and we both, us and the seller said that let's take a step back and focus on other things. So for us, it's important to be clear. It almost never happens. The discontinued processes, but you should never continue something that you don't feel is 100% right. So we have now focused on our strong pipeline and are replacing that with another company. So all in all, very good operational performance in the M&A team and the pipeline with good visibility. Down to the left, we are showing what we talk about when we look at a full year in M&A. For us, it's important to deliver over 15% annual growth on EBITDA, which we have done for many years. And the biggest part of that is using our cash to buy new companies and that usually is 10% to 12% of the annual growth. So for us now when closing Q2. We're happy to see that we are a bit ahead of that acquisition curve. So for this year, we have good visibility to continue to do acquisition during the fall is what we can look forward to. Going into one of our acquisitions, RMS medical device that we closed in April. It's a fast-growing metal device distributor, serving hospitals and health care institution across the Benelux. And they have different areas of expertise as all our companies that we buy. A little bit of artificial intelligence comes in here as well. It's more and more companies use that to be helping customers in a good way. They have 40 years of experience in the Berlin market. And they have roughly SEK 170 million in annual sales with 25 employees and we expect them to contribute positively to our EBITDA margin as well. So a good acquisition. All right. Coming to an end. To summarize this then, I mean, this quarter was a good middle of the road, stable quarter. So of course, the 24% total growth, out of which 6% organic EBITDA is something we're really proud of in the market that is growing with 3%, 4%. So this shows both that we can grow faster than the market and also use the group scale to see that we can grow faster on the bottom line and also have a 10% EBITDA margin now, which is our target. So we continue to deliver good and robust cash flow, and the M&A process is according to plan. So with that, I think we can close this presentation and go into Q&A.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Gustav Berneblad from Nordea.
Gustav Berneblad
analystIt's Gustav from Nordea. I thought maybe just to start off with North, if you can just give a bit more color there on the strong organic growth of 10% year-over-year there any one-off related larger orders from defense and so forth? Or if it's just broad-based or more related to a more easy base effect from last year?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes, I can say a word or 2 about that, Gustav. I think there are -- to answer your first part, you guys, no, there are no big lumpy one-off orders in terms of similar to what we had back in 2024. I would also say, as Johan mentioned, we would kind of continue to push you to think about rolling 12 months, don't get too hung up on 1 individual quarter. So 10% is obviously it's a strong figure, but I don't think we should suddenly conclude that there's anything particularly special happening in North. The region is doing well. They are performing nicely operationally. They're doing good things. We look forward to getting the new distribution center up and running, but this is more of a steady, solid, strong base performance from the region rather than anything that indicates anything other than that.
Gustav Berneblad
analystYes. Okay. That's very clear. And on the earn-out payments you comment on here for 2027 on SEK 150 million. Is it possible to just elaborate a bit more on how much larger they can potentially be and if they also will be paid out in Q2?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes, that's good question. So yes, they will. The vast majority of them will be paid out in Q2 at the moment I anticipate they will all be paid out in Q2, but things can happen. But yes, is typically the quarter we pay them out. The reason for that is we wait for the fully audited and signed off annual reports from the end of the previous year, and that usually takes a couple of months and that becomes available in Q2 and then we then we pay the earn-outs exactly as we have done in 2026. The earnout payments that will be paid in 2027 are for companies that come to the end of their earnout in December 2026. And typically, those companies are companies that will have had an earnout period that has run '24, '25 and '26. So they will have run for 3 years up to that point and then the earnout is paid. And obviously, '24 is done, '25 is done, 26. We're halfway into it. So if you think about it, we are already sort of 80% into whatever the math is 75% of the way into the final calculation of that earn-out period. So the likelihood that, that figure would change dramatically is very, very small because the vast majority of that earnout calculation is already finalized, if that makes any sense, I feel I made that more complicated than it was supposed to be, but I hope that makes sense.
Gustav Berneblad
analystNo, that's very clear. If you cannot state the full figure, I take that for sure.
Thomas Moss
executiveNo. But I think I try to -- what I'm trying to say is when we say SEK 150 million, it might be 10% higher or 10% lower, depending on how the last 6 months of the 3-year earnout period develops. But it's not going to suddenly jump to SEK 300 million, partly because there isn't time for those companies to earn sufficient extra earnings adjusted that. And also the way we have gradually evolved and developed the earn-out model over recent years is we have actually established a more firm ceiling on how much the maximum earnout payment can be. So the earn-out we paid out this year had a more generous ceiling than the future earn-outs have and will have. So you can be confident that, that SEK 150 million, yes, it might move a little bit up and down, but it's not something that will move dramatically.
Gustav Berneblad
analystThat's very clear. And then just the last question here. I know you probably talked about this and very well discussed warehouse in Gothenburg, but can you just remind us, are there anything we should be aware of in terms of which quarter will be a large move for you where you might -- where you might anticipate sort of effect on volumes or anything just that might hamper earnings or sales?
Thomas Moss
executiveGot it. Yes. No, I can say. I think our philosophy with this and the quality of the team that we have down there means that we don't expect any impact in terms of volumes, operational actors will not see the effect of this transfer. And we're confident we have backup plans in place and redundancies in place to ensure that, that won't have a short-term influence -- the plan is to continue gradually ramp up the operation activities through Q4 -- Q3, Q4 this year. And effectively, we will be fully operational in the first half of 2027. And then obviously, there will be some minor teething issues that we need to work through. So we expect the full benefits of the SEK 50 million to SEK 60 million a year that we expect to save those full benefits will not start to be seen in the P&L until H2 2027.
Gustav Berneblad
analystThat's clear. But will there be any dual costs or anything like that?
Thomas Moss
executiveSorry, yes, second half of your question. Yes, so we anticipate a very low single-digit millions in terms of double manning primarily it's double manning costs that we will have. The largest chunk of that we will probably see in Q4 this year, there will be perhaps a little bit in Q3 and a little bit in Q1, but low tens of millions of double manning costs at the back end of this year. There will also be a temporary effect on working capital perhaps somewhere between SEK 50 million and SEK 100 million of additional working capital that we will have for double inventory, again, through that same time period, primarily concentrated at the back end of this year into the first part of next year.
Gustav Berneblad
analystThat's clear. Low single digits, is that for Q3, Q1 and Q4, respectively, or...
Thomas Moss
executiveNo, no, combined.
Gustav Berneblad
analystCombined. Okay. That's clear.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Jakob Lembke from SEB.
Jakob Lembke
analystMy first question is on North, where the EBITDA margin is down here for the second consecutive quarters despite what I believe is some positive impact from M&A. So yes, just if you could elaborate a bit on what's behind that, please?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes, I can, in a way, give you the same answer as I just gave to Gustav, Jakob. I think there will always be small fluctuations up and down. When I look at the margin in North, the rolling 12-month margin in December 2025 was running at 13% and the last 12-month figure when we looked in Q1 was running at 13.1%. The figure now is 13.5%. So from our perspective, margins are stable in North and I wouldn't read it too much into what looks like a sequential drop. As I say, we're confident that margins are running at a stable level above 13%.
Jakob Lembke
analystOkay. And then just looking for Q3, it seems like margin is usually a bit lower in Q3. Is it possible to guide how much that sort of sequential drop usually?
Thomas Moss
executiveAgain, I would guide to look at the rolling 12 months margins. I think you're right, Q3 historically and currently tends to be our weakest quarter, the smallest quarter overall. But yes, I would continue to look at the rolling 12 months figure, and that we expect to be around 13% to continue at that 13% plus level in region noise. There's nothing going on that means that there should be a dramatic change to that.
Jakob Lembke
analystOkay. Then on the West, the organic growth is a bit lower than we've been used to, but I think the EBITDA growth still -- the organic EBITDA growth looks quite good. So if you can elaborate on what's happening in West as well?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes. Again, I sort of get slightly the same answer. I wouldn't read too much into that. I think you need to always look at this business on a rolling 12-month basis. we did have particularly strong organic revenue growth in West going back last year, that clearly anything above 10% organic revenue growth was going to not be maintained in a market that's only growing at 3% in the quarter, as you say, it's a little bit lower. The half year figure is running at 4%, but we are delivering strong leverage to the EBITDA growth. So Region West continues to perform well. We expect the organic revenue growth in Region West will continue to be in that stronger than the market, perhaps up to twice the rate of the market everywhere else. There is no there is no significant shift in the underlying steady strong performance that we have in Region West.
Jakob Lembke
analystFair. But if I may follow up then, if the momentum in the home care business in West still strong? Or is that slowing down a bit -- if there's something else that is a bit -- I mean it is a meaningful sequential drop, I would say, in the organic growth?
Thomas Moss
executiveNo, I think we would not say that we see any particular slowdown in the opportunities in the Home Care business. We continue to build strength and scale there. So we have no concerns. And I understand when you look quarter-on-quarter, mathematically, you see that what you perhaps could conclude as a slowdown. But I do not think that, that actually is sort of some fundamental change in the market dynamics. It's important to understand that this region is the home care is a very significant and important part and has driven the strong growth in West, but that's not the only thing that's going on in the region. So I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that's how the opportunity in Home Care has suddenly stopped.
Jakob Lembke
analystOkay. Then I have a question also on M&A. I think that just looking at the deals you've done, is the M&A growth will come down a bit here in Q3, but probably still be at your target level, but then it will come down further in Q4 and probably be below the sort of target level you want to be at. So just based on what you're seeing now in the pipeline, how comment are you that you will be able to sustain that sort of 10% to 12% M&A growth also for Q4?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes. I mean we are first look at the number of deals in the pipeline, we have more than we can digest. We have hundreds of deals that we look at and 10 to 20 deal that in a very concrete discussions. So the number of deals and the quality of the deals, it's not going to be an issue over the next 1 to 2 to 3 years as we have no reason to see that it will dry out. So the question is only how much money do we have to buy saying disciplined under 2.5x. And with a high cash conversion and very low CapEx we know that the money will give us 10% to 12% growth on M&A. We have no reason to say that they're not continue for foreseeable future. And then on top of that, we have the organic growth that we have seen. So -- and then, of course, it could be 1 quarter a little bit more, 1 quarter, a little bit less. Now I think technically, we have done 57% of the annual target, but that is more coincidence when a deal comes in and pushed over a quarter or not. So when M&A is going to continue steady. That's the least thing we are worried about, I would say.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Erik Cassel from Danske Bank.
Erik Cassel
analystI first want to discuss a bit on the organic growth outlook for North specifically. There's to my eyes, a bit push and pull as well. If I recall correctly, you had the [indiscernible] logistic contracts that they went in-house with now in May. First, was that something that you've seen an effect now through the second half of this quarter? Or are they still mainly sourcing from you? And are you seeing any other regions going in-house and sort of changing the way they source? And secondly, on the Swedish stockpiling preparedness rules that's coming into effect in January, I believe almost SEK 600 million has been allocated to sort of spending on that already in 2016. Is that something that you're seeing positively on for H2? And then lastly, what's the pipeline of defense contracts that you may be seeing now? If you have anything, I think all of that would be helpful.
Thomas Moss
executiveFirst of all, to take a slight half a step back and just remind us the group is large, diverse, 19 countries, 70 companies. So obviously, Sweden is one of the larger units in the group. But individual contracts in an individual country and an individual company, they make a relatively minor impact on the group as a whole. And we very much continue to expect, believe and see that the group as a whole will deliver organic EBITA growth faster than the market, maybe not quite twice the rate of the market, but definitely faster than the market. We will continue to add margin expansion on top of that, which means that we should be seeing EBITDA growth somewhere in that 5%, 6%, 7%, 8% range. Sometimes it will be a bit more. Sometimes it will be a bit less sometimes 1 will contribute a bit more, sometimes 1 region will contribute a bit less. But big picture, that is what we expect to see. And there will be very, very few occasions where individual companies or individual contracts significantly alter that fundamental long-term underlying trajectory. So that I think we should keep in mind. In terms of your very specific questions, Eric. Yes, the developments with or they've been well known that they've been part of our plans. Actually, that's not what was I going to say -- that's not a sort of a huge part of our business, even though the volumes are relatively large, it's primarily a flow-through operation. So it doesn't have a huge effect on our financial statements. Actually, we are continuing to service that contract as well. Scona is not yet ready to take that fully in-house as far as I understand it. So that shouldn't have any meaningful effect on Q3 or Q4. And even if that business eventually moves somewhere , it won't have a big effect either because of the scale I was just describing. In terms of defense, I think there's a huge amount of defense and preparedness thinking and work going on in multiple countries and multiple companies around the group where we're involved in lots of interesting discussions to say that we would expect sort of specifically the Swedish announcement that you mentioned to have some sort of meaningful bump in the North figures. Again, I don't think you should sort of suddenly add in a big extra chunk on top of the normal flow in the North or in Swedish figures.
Johan Falk
executiveAnd maybe for me to add to the general trend I mean, what region 1 made a decision a couple of years ago to take it in-house, that's against the overall trend in Europe. What we see is regions, municipalities and health care providers are struggling to manage 50,000-plus products with clean room with very big small parcels to a lot of different addresses. So they usually come to us, and so we can help them with that. We have a lot of good initiatives of moving towards that trend. Health feed in Southeast is Norway where we have mental packs helping hospitals to get the right products at the right department in a quite complex system. So the trend is definitely going that way. So this is not something that we are afraid of at all rather us being the market leader in Europe with a very strong logistics backbone can support the Sweden to do it more efficiently and especially now when they need prepayment stock where you have to request quite often to support regions and municipalities with that across Europe.
Erik Cassel
analystOkay. Great. Thank you for a long answer. And good 1 at all. I only have 1 more question is on the acquired company's margins. If I calculate correctly, they're still tracking quite a lot above what you've talked about, I get to almost 17% in margins incrementally now. I think I asked a similar question at Q1 as well, you said like they're above 10%, but I probably shouldn't expect them to keep tracking on this margin level for the full year. So I sort of repeat that question from Q1. Are you then expecting some sort of, say, drop in those acquired companies margins for H2? Or can they now continue to trend on this level?
Thomas Moss
executiveI can say -- I have to be honest, Eric, I don't fully recognize that calculation. Maybe you want to send me a little excel afterwards, and we can discuss it a bit. These companies definitely are margin enhancing to the group. I think we half joked about it before in our sort of coded language. If we talk about margin enhancing, you can guess that it's above 10%. But if we were actually buying businesses that were adding 17%, as you mentioned, we would probably talk about strongly margin enhancing or something like that. And these companies are not strongly margin enhancing, but they are margin enhancing. So Yes, I think that we would have to dive into that a little bit because I certainly don't recognize that figure.
Erik Cassel
analystOkay. Yes. I might as well be my math as well -- there's no downside really to where margins tracking now?
Thomas Moss
executiveNo, no. I suppose in terms of the kind of the underlying thought on your question is there a fear that there will be some kind of negative bounce back to come from what these businesses contribute? Absolutely not. No. They come in, they're performing nicely. They're performing solidly, and we expect them to continue to do that. So there's no there's no step change in what they will contribute to the group. No.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from [Albin Nordmark] from SB1 Markets.
Unknown Analyst
analystJuan and Tom, I hope you can hear me. I have a question on the margin bridge. So gross margin was up around year-over-year to 42%, and adjusted EBITDA margin was up 50 bps. So 2 parts here. What is in the gross margin that makes SP1 Purchasing credit in terms of pricing? And then where it offset below the gross profit line?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes, I can take that. I think you have answered it in the question yourself. The biggest element that contributes to this picture is mix. So the businesses that we buy and have bought over the last few years have come in with higher gross margins than the average of the organic group, but in terms of the way we lay out our P&L, they have much higher costs as well. They tend to be more equipment heavy. They tend to be more service-oriented, have a higher degree of, for example, sales or technical staff or whatever versus the consumable businesses. So the structure, the shape of the P&Ls of the businesses that we've bought, but often also some of the businesses and the new business areas we've developed into is different from the historic core distribution P&L, and that difference is that they come in with much higher margins, but net-net, they only have slightly higher EBITDA margins and that gradually shifts and distorts the P&L over time. Having said that, of course, we continue to work with -- we continue to work with our COGS. We continue to work with our pricing. We continue to work with our relationships with the OEMs and our customers as well. So we are getting through organic benefits too much in at the gross margin level as well. But perhaps the larger impact is on mix effect.
Unknown Analyst
analystAnd nothing related to own brands?
Thomas Moss
executiveNo, that -- I think private label is -- it's an interesting topic. It's 1 that we've touched on a little bit before. It's around 10% of our current revenues. But for us, own label is very much patchwork of different offerings that we have that have come with the M&As that we've done through the years. We definitely see a systemic opportunity for own label as the industry consolidates and as we go into the future. But I think that's more of an opportunity for the future than something that we are driving particularly hard in the short term.
Unknown Analyst
analystThat's clear. And then just a quick 1 on tax. It was 21% here in the quarter. And I think you guided for 22 to 20 in Q1. So is there anything should we just model in the low end here? Or is there anything to add?
Thomas Moss
executiveNo. I think there are always sort of small fluctuations there as well, particular companies or particular situations, but my -- if I look at my own Excel, I have '22 to '23 in it. So if you want to follow my modeling, I would stick at the more cautious end of the range rather than suddenly reading something into the fact that it was a tiny bit lower in Q2.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Charles Weston from RBC.
Unknown Analyst
analystBoth relate to the U.K., so I'll ask them together, if that's okay. First of all, could you characterize the demand environment in the U.K. as part of West in Q2, particularly as it relates to capital versus consumables. I asked this because a peer flagged strong orders, but customers deferring deliveries. So we're just trying to understand whether that's a shared dynamic or specific to their channel? And the second question relates to the new value-based procurement guidance in the NHS in June. Just wondering if that's affected purchasing time lines for you in U.K. customers or perhaps it's too early to see that yet?
Thomas Moss
executiveYes, I can try and take that one. I think typically, in a way, I would go back to 1 of the answers I gave earlier on in terms of the sort of the scope and the scale and the diversity of the group. So we are always a bit reluctant of blaming or praising any individual company or country who does anything out to the ordinary. But in terms of the U.K., I'm also conscious there is a lot of noise and commentary floating around that. We don't have a massive business in the U.K. I think that's also important to state. So HSL, the platform that we bought in West has good operations in Ireland and Northern Ireland, we have subsequently added a couple of smaller bolt-ons in the U.K. as itself. So for us, the U.K. is not a large market at the moment, but it's 1 that is interesting that we'd like to get into more in the future. If I come to your specific point in terms of delays, procurement orders, I guess we can say that we have heard a little bit of noise around the topic, but it hasn't had some sort of long-term severe meaningful impact. I think we just take that as part of the normal cycle sometimes things are a bit slower, sometimes they come back. But fundamentally, money gets spent on health care. Johan often talks about the kind of the hierarchy of government needs. And governments will continue to spend money in health care, on patients, on capital goods. So if it's a little bit late to 1 quarter later or 2 quarters later, it's okay, it will come, money will be spent. So that's our sort of general view, general philosophy and has been proved out over time. In terms of the very specific new procurement rules that you mentioned to the U.K., I actually am not in a position to comment on that. I think it's too early to say, and I certainly don't have any particular insight into any impact that would have -- but again, I would put it back into the box of the answer that I just gave. I think money will be spent eventually.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Jakob Lembke from SEB.
Jakob Lembke
analystIt's a short one. The other operating income in the quarter, that's SEK 24 million, is that currency effects? Or what is that?
Thomas Moss
executiveNo. That actually is the -- there's a very small contribution in there from the sale of a building that we came with an acquisition. Jakob let me get back to you on that before I do a half answer to double check that.
Jakob Lembke
analystOkay. If this one-off effects in that? Have those been adjusted for in adjusted EBITDA?
Thomas Moss
executiveNo, there is no major one-off effect. The sale of the building netted us a profit of around just under SEK 2 million. So there was a tiny positive effect there, but there is no significant EI associated with that.
Operator
operatorThere are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.
Thomas Moss
executiveAll right. Thank you for good questions and taking the time once again. And I wish you a very nice summer and see you in Q3. Goodbye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Asker Healthcare Group AB (publ) transcript — plus 246,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Asker Healthcare Group AB (publ) earnings transcripts and 246,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.