Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. (G) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
March 13, 2025
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood afternoon. I'm the conference operator for Chorus Call. Welcome, and thanks for being with us on the Generali Group Full Year 2024 Results Presentation. <<operator_script>> Right now, I'll hand the conference over to Mr. Fabio Cleva, Head of Investor and Rating Agencies Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Fabio Cleva
executiveHi everyone, and thanks for being on our call covering full year 2024 results. Joining us on the line today are Group CEO Philippe Donnet; General Manager Marco Sesana; Giulio Terzariol, CEO of Insurance; and Group CFO Cristiano Borean. Ahead of taking your questions, I'll pass things to Philippe for a few opening comments.
Philippe Donnet
executiveThank you, Fabio. Good morning, and thanks for joining us on this call covering our full year 2024 results — Cristiano, Giulio, Marco and I are all here with you. Ahead of taking your questions, I'd like to offer a handful of key remarks. With these figures, our Lifetime Partner 24: Driving Growth plan comes to its close, and we're proud that we over-delivered on every financial target. That makes it the third strategic plan in a row that we've brought to a successful conclusion, and the 2024 numbers give further proof that our group is in the strongest position it has ever held. The operating result came in at EUR 7.3 billion, while the adjusted net result reached EUR 3.8 billion for the full year — both new record highs — and every business segment contributed very positively to getting us there. Back when we presented the full year 2023 results, I emphasized that getting net collection back into positive territory would rank among our priorities. In Life, net flows at year-end 2024 stood close to EUR 10 billion. That great achievement, which has no parallel in the industry, was made possible by our powerful distribution force. So let me thank our agents and advisers for their excellent work. These net inflows were entirely driven by protection and unit-linked lines.
Philippe Donnet
executiveMaintaining our emphasis on underwriting discipline and managing in-force business has pushed up further the proportion of Life reserves tied to capital-light products, which hit 71% at year-end. Within Property & Casualty, gross written premiums rose 7.7%, and that came from positive results in both motor and non-motor lines, with growth in every major market where we operate. Our tariff strengthening actions likewise kept delivering results all year long. You can see this too in our undiscounted combined ratio, which improved to below 96%, matching our guidance, and that holds even after accounting for the EUR 1.2 billion impact of natural catastrophes. The underlying trend demonstrates how the team can deliver successfully. Our undiscounted loss ratio, once you exclude nat cat from prior years, comes in with a 1.4 percentage point improvement. That stands far ahead of anyone else in the industry, and it would be near 2 points on the same perimeter as 2023, leaving out Liberty Seguros. As Giulio mentioned during our Investor Day, we remain strongly committed to ongoing gains in technical excellence. And this performance demonstrates that we are entering the new plan with very positive momentum on this front as well. Going forward, we firmly believe the key trends we outlined then will generate meaningful profitable growth opportunities for Generali.
Philippe Donnet
executiveWith customer demand continuing to rise, protection, Health & Accident premiums kept accelerating and now make up roughly 22% of the group's total gross written premiums. This segment delivers strong profitability, and it sits at the heart of our strategy to grow the count of multi-holding customers. Three key strengths will make sure we get there. First, the top relationship Net Promoter Score versus our main peers; second, a modular product range that answers customer needs; and third, a very effective distribution platform, strengthened by greater use of data and artificial intelligence. Proprietary distribution is a vital cornerstone of what we offer. Through agents we distribute more than half of the policies, almost double the industry average. In a falling interest rate environment, our agents let us reshape our Life book when lapses rise, which allowed us to outperform the market. As Marco pointed out in his Venice presentation, our agents are essential to capturing growth in our preferred lines of business. Turning to Asset & Wealth Management. Total assets under management for the group hit EUR 863 billion, up 32%, helped by positive net inflows and the consolidation of Conning Holdings Limited.
Philippe Donnet
executiveThis segment's operating result rose nearly 23%, reaching EUR 1.2 billion. Woody spoke at the Investor Day about why it matters to have an integrated offering that combines a large life insurance book with our strengthened asset management platform. Making full use of that relationship is essential for us. When this management team assumed leadership of the group, subsidiaries were remitting roughly EUR 2.4 billion. By 2024, those remittances had climbed to EUR 4.5 billion, which helped deliver the highest net holding cash flow we have ever reported, at EUR 3.8 billion. An unwavering emphasis on cash and capital optimization has ranked among Cristiano's priorities during his 6 years as group CFO. It will remain a vital element of how we focus on growing shareholder remuneration. Given this healthy cash flow generation, a solid capital position with a 220% Solvency II ratio and the business's underlying growth, we will propose a dividend per share of EUR 1.43 at the next Annual General Meeting, up almost 12% year-on-year, along with a EUR 500 million share buyback to be launched this year, subject to regulatory approval. Lastly, I want to note the further meaningful progress we achieved as a responsible investor, insurer, employer and corporate citizen.
Philippe Donnet
executiveNext comes Lifetime Partner 27: Driving Excellence, and sustainability stands as 1 of its 3 core pillars. To wrap up, the 2024 financial results we delivered stem from hard work throughout the last 3 strategic cycles, and our attention has already shifted to executing our new plan. Once again we have pledged ourselves to highly ambitious targets. And we possess everything required to succeed and to keep generating sustainable value for all stakeholders while pursuing excellence in all that we do. Prior to opening the Q&A, allow me to remind everyone that the Annual General Meeting takes place on April 24 in Trieste. I hope to see you there, and many thanks for your attention. Operator, we are now ready to take questions regarding our 2024 results.
Operator
operator<<operator_script>> Our first question comes from David Barma at Bank of America.
David Barma
analystStarting with the first one, on the really strong P&C results in Q4. You improved the undiscounted current year loss ratio by roughly 1.6% in Q4 versus the 9 months, which served as the new cycle's starting point, right? And in fact, we're even nearer to that 2.5% once you factor in that manmade losses came in higher during Q4. So that beats your target for the coming 3 years. I know it's just 1 quarter, but given how well pricing is trending — at least through 2025 — I'd expect underlying profitability to keep improving. So could you speak a bit about that, and about how Q4 came in relative to the improvement you expect across the next 3 years? That's my first question. Second, still on P&C and specifically the Motor line, would you say most of the pruning now sits behind us, particularly in Italy, and that in 2025 we can begin to see somewhat more volume growth? And finally, on cash, at the CMD I believe you indicated roughly EUR 400 million of remittances would come from management actions in 2025, yet I'd have imagined Liberty Seguros, the excess capital, and the steps taken with Allianz and Genertel would already deliver more than that.
David Barma
analystCould you go over again the management actions that are expected to come through in 2025, please?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, David. Giulio, the first 2 questions are yours. The third 1 goes to Cristiano.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveThank you, David, for those questions. Regarding the fourth quarter's development, I will never read too much into slides, aside from the fact that this gives you clearly the idea or the confidence that we have as we go also into 2025. What I'm saying shouldn't read too much into the slides on the quarter because at the end of the year, you always have validation of all the assumptions that you have. And so in that sense you get a little bit of a catch-up effect from an accounting point of view in the quarter. But clearly, when you see a strong ending, this means that we have a lot of quality in our numbers. And if you look at where we are standing right now in motor, the undiscounted combined ratio is 98%. So that's a very strong basis. And as we think about also 2025, we still expect to see rate increases on top of the inflation. So from that point of view, there is room to do even better. To your specific question about pruning, I would say we have a limited situation, we really need to pruning and a situation like that might be Genertel in Italy.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveIn certain geographies—motor and pruning—we still need to secure some extra pricing. Spain and Portugal come to mind. That said, at a fundamental level, performance is already strong right now, and we anticipate further gains from a very good level in 2025 and beyond. On non-motor too, we're running a solid combined ratio, particularly when we adjust for the net-cat impact and normalize for it. Obviously, with non-motor, we always have to be somewhat cautious, because assuming the nat cat budget will be lower is just an assumption. Still, I believe we're well positioned even if net-cat turns out more elevated than our assumption.
Cristiano Borean
executiveHey David. Turning to what we expect for 2025, the key thing to remember is what I said at the Investor Day: 2024 was a special year, with EUR 400 million from Italy and EUR 200 million from Austria. For 2025, you should expect more of a capital management action on the order of, I'd say, EUR 400 million to EUR 450 million, covering all the actions, which will again involve Italy, as we were pointing out.
Operator
operatorMoving on, our next question comes from Andrew Baker at Goldman Sachs.
Andrew Baker
analystStarting with the CSM operating variances — could you provide a bit more detail on the model refinements you made in France, Germany, and Asia? And in connection with that, how should we think about the 2025 operating variance that will come through on the lap side as a result of your methodology change? Any guidance on that would be helpful. Second, your Life new business margin in the fourth quarter came in sequentially above Q3, which is better than you guided at the time. So I'm just curious what drove that sequential movement compared with what you had anticipated? And also, are you able to share the new business value for 2024, what it would have been under the new definition you'll be using going forward?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Andrew. Cristiano will take the first question and the third one, and Marco will handle the second question, which is about the new business margin in Q4.
Cristiano Borean
executiveYes, absolutely, Andrew. So in addition to the lapses impact — which makes up the EUR 1.1 billion of the total EUR 1.4 billion — there's the EUR 0.3 billion effect from the last quarter, and those items aren't tied to lapses; on the refinement side they're mostly model changes in France tied to how the movement between unit-linked payment and multi-hybrid product is treated, along with some change in an expense review assumption on Germany. And a more negative development of the morbidity assumption in China. Those are the main 3 drivers, and all of them — the 3 of them — added up to around EUR 0.3 billion.
Fabio Cleva
executiveMarco, what about the margins on new business?
Marco Sesana
executiveYes. So I think the overall development we're seeing in the new business margin lines up with what we set out as guidance at the start of the year. So we said we were seeing an improvement of the new business margin across different quarters. So we're coming to the level where we expect it to be, in particular. You know that we have always said that we would have done trade-off versus on volume versus margins and scaling back gradually over the next months, the commercial incentive that we had to improve our collection and that's what we did. So we're at the level where we expect it to be. And again, going maybe I think it's useful also to look forward. So what do we expect for the next few months, we do expect this level of new business margin going forward. Clearly, we will need to be also tactical and gradually understanding the macro situation on the interest rate to understand when to cut back more on the commercial action and having a good creation of value because I just want to remind that everything is done to create more value overall.
Marco Sesana
executiveNew business margin and new business volumes are part of that line. Cristiano?
Cristiano Borean
executiveYes. Andrew, to finish up on the 2025 guidance — regarding the CSM, as I mentioned earlier, once we’ve implemented all of these changes to the lapse assumptions, we anticipate operating variances developing in a much more stable way next year, with their effect falling materially to something very minor, just to be clear. On your third question, about what new business value and new business margin would be under the new definition, which we also covered at the Investor Day: you should view new business value as EUR 3 billion, so essentially EUR 0.7 billion more, under the new definition, and new business margin would rise by 80 bps to 5.4%, pointing to an improvement of 15 to 20 basis points as a margin as we move into 2025.
Operator
operatorMichael Huttner from Berenberg has the next question.
Michael Huttner
analystWell, congratulations — 3 cycles in a row really is impressive. I have 3 fairly easy questions. The first one follows up a little on an earlier question about the cash outlook. I saw that in 2024 you had a fairly large amount from — or a fairly large increase from others. So I was just wondering what that is and how much additional we might get? And also, I believe there was a question that there was a Liberty, with EUR 300 million remaining there, and whether that is part of the management actions you mentioned. Then the second one is also about cash, Switzerland. I recall you saying mama takes back, and I was wondering whether that has already begun in 2025? And the third question relates to something I think you said, Philippe, in an interview — that you're buying, that you will be buying more Italian government bonds. And I was just wondering whether you could perhaps explain your thinking on that.
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Michael. The first question, plus the second one about cash, are both for Cristiano. And naturally, the BTP question goes to Philippe.
Cristiano Borean
executiveMichael, so when you look at that rise in other remittances for 2024, you should also factor in some one-off effects — for example, contributions from M&A initiatives, like certain dividends we got from Malaysia, if I use 2024 as the example on the other line. Also don't forget that in 2023 we had some high dividends coming from asset management, because of the preparation for the Conning deal. Moving to Liberty: is that included in the CFO's management action? Yes. They are in there. We're already beginning to get cash back in the first quarter of 2025 from Liberty as a first piece, and the second piece comes through the year. On Switzerland, does the remittance already start in 2025? The answer is no — we're completing a final step, given the very healthy position of the Life company. Be aware that we're slightly above 250% on the Swiss Solvency Test ratio at year-end 2024. So everything is lined up in preparation, but we agreed to have 2025 as a year of stabilization and understanding of the full sensitivities with all the numbers, to get started from 2026. As you mentioned, what mama gives, mama will start to ask for.
Philippe Donnet
executiveHi, Michael. As you’re aware, the BTP portfolio ties back to our insurance liabilities in Italy, and that will remain true. At December 31, 2024, group exposure to government bonds stood at EUR 35.6 billion, versus EUR 38.5 billion at the close of 2023, and it is almost entirely there to support our Italian life business. That figure also takes in EUR 5.6 billion held by Banca Generali. Being an Italian group with a sizable and profitable life insurance operation in Italy, BTPs are naturally a key element of how we allocate investments. And given what has happened in the markets and the positive — the very positive net inflows for 2024, we are examining raising our BTP purchases, clearly in line with our investment policy and with our risk tolerance.
Operator
operatorFarooq Hanif from JPMorgan has the next question.
Farooq Hanif
analystCan you discuss the increase in the Life investment margin? Were there any one-offs in 2024 that we should strip out? Also, you had very strong investment income in P&C as well. So please comment, I suppose, on how sustainable that is given the current macro environment. My second question is on margins. When you adjust for your new approach, you're already fairly close to your 6% new business margin target in Life. So I was wondering what the path to reaching it looks like? I mean, is it a fairly easy step from here, for example, in 2025 or 2026, to get there more quickly? And in that context, I noticed there's a large increase in the margin in CEE — you commented on it in your slides — but if you could give us more detail on what's happening there, that would be really helpful.
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks so much, Farooq. Cristiano will take the first question, and the second one goes to Giulio.
Cristiano Borean
executiveHi Farooq. I believe what you're calling the margin is actually the Life investment result. So the impact — let me just verify it against the 2023 figure for the last quarter — has been a slight decline compared with 2023, as you saw, since rates came in lower. There's also an effect tied to the fact that in China we are adopting IFRS 17 at the local level, which means one single rate must be applied, and that rate carries somewhat higher interest rates, which then get unwound in the EFI, producing a more negative impact down the road, with a clearly offsetting element from the value on the other side. Another effect has been a shift of excess capital from Life shareholder equity over to P&C shareholder equity in Argentina, and that shift weighs EUR 30 million. So taking everything together, let me say that the investment result for 2024 ought to be read alongside our guidance for 2025 of roughly EUR 900 million, including the effect I mentioned to you — a higher EFI stemming from this changing curve, in China as well. That's what I'd note on that.
Cristiano Borean
executiveRegarding P&C, I believe we ought to view the move I referenced from Life to P&C as something that will keep repeating where the additional P&C return out of Argentina is concerned. That said, I noted earlier, already back at the Investor Day, that this volatility arising from the Argentina side should not be factored in. To put it briefly, last year was fairly strong in terms of that contribution. So I think the run rate we project for 2025, at roughly EUR 950 million, is a solid conservative estimate for you to plug in, along with this environment of lower interest rates also affecting the cash return.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveWe can move to the Life side. Perhaps first I'll address what you asked regarding that jump in Eastern Europe's new business margin. But before anything else, bear in mind that roughly 3/4 of our premium in Eastern Europe is protection. So that's a highly profitable line of business. And as rates decline, the new business margin on protection rises. We also had some change in operating assumptions, which was a positive. On top of that, we're seeing less inflation on the expense side, and that too has helped deliver a better new business margin. So we're quite happy with the level, we're happy with the improvement, and that also matters a great deal. We believe we can sustain this level going forward. And clearly, we're going to push especially on the potential element in Eastern Europe. Now, on your question, taking a broader scope, I'd say that moving from the 5.4% that Cristiano mentioned earlier to the 6% that we put into our strategic plan is not super easy. So we need to work on that. You need to bear in mind that our new business margin already sits at a high level. So generally, we're starting from a high level point of view.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveYou can see clearly that this is among the strongest margins in the business. So from that angle, some work is needed on our side to move from 5.4% up to 6%. Mix will be one factor, since across the plan horizon we expect more protection business relative to, say, savings, and that by itself ought to lift the new business margin. So basically we have a plan for reaching it. But if you ask me whether it's a given, I'd say no, it isn't, so we clearly need to work on that over the next 3 years. That's a good part of the story. Our distribution is strong. So from that standpoint, we can truly control our destiny, though some work remains on this one.
Operator
operatorMoving on to Iain Pearce from Exane BNP Paribas, who has our next question.
Iain Pearce
analystTwo questions, and they both relate to the motor business. First, on the 98% full year combined ratio — that's a bit better than what I understood you to have mentioned at the Investor Day. I'm just trying to figure out whether anything there is sort of one-off, or whether there's some favorable experience, favorable PYD in it? Or do you see the 98% as a genuine underlying level and a solid starting point for the 2027 plan? And then the second one concerns the motor businesses in France and Italy. So it looks like they're growing below the level of rate increase or average premium increase that you would have been achieving in 2024; you flagged some challenges around Genertel in Italy. I wonder if you could first just elaborate on why that's so challenging in the direct segment. And do you expect those businesses to return to above premium increased growth in 2024 — 2025, sorry, in France and Italy. It would be great if you could elaborate on that.
Fabio Cleva
executiveBoth of those are directed at Giulio.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveAll right, then, beginning with motor — yes, I'd describe that 98% as a solid proxy for where we start. In that respect, nothing unusual or one-off accounts for the 98%. From that standpoint, you can treat it as a reference point, and in the coming year, given the rate increases we've put through, which sit above inflation, we'd expect that 98% to come in even lower. So we're feeling quite good about what we've accomplished on the motor side. There are perhaps just 2 areas of uncertainty: Spain and Portugal. Not because we aren't acting, but because inflation in Spain and Portugal has proven more persistent than in other geographies. One encouraging development on motor is that inflation is easing somewhat, and above all, we're seeing lower frequency more or less across the board. With that in mind, we might also anticipate frequency staying lower as we move into the next year. So fundamentally, this is a strong business at present, performing well and with room for further improvement. Turning to France and Italy: in Italy, the situation has been driven in particular by Genertel, yet beyond Genertel as well, we aren't really growing the number of policies in motor.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveYou see this more on the non-motor side, but if you look at Italy, Genertel is clearly reducing its number of risks, and on the non-Genertel side there's a slight decline—but that clearly reflects the work we're doing to reach the strong motor combined ratio you're seeing. In France, there was more pruning in motor, particularly early in the year. We're now taking some corrective steps as well, since performance is very good. So my expectation is that as we move into 2025, you'll see stronger growth—less of a pruning impact in motor, if you will, than what you saw during 2024.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from William Hawkins at KBW.
William Hawkins
analystTo revisit a few things you’ve already addressed—sorry about that—on the Life investment results and outlook: did I hear you say EUR 900 million for 2025? That seems really low next to EUR 943 million for a business that ought to be growing. Could you repeat your outlook comment on the Life investment result, please? Second, you’ve already been generous with detail on the new business margin, but the commercial initiatives had a specific impact—they were a 50 basis point drag last year. What drag do you expect in 2025? And do we keep that sort of par pursue under the new methodology, or is there some reason it might change with the new methodology? And last, sorry to ask again because I was typing while you were speaking: on the higher exposure to BTPs, are you simply saying your business will be bigger, so of course you’ll own more BTPs—or is there actually a suggestion that your economic weighting toward BTPs could be rising?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, William. Cristiano gets the first question, Marco the second, and Giulio the third. And naturally, Marco, feel free to add anything.
Cristiano Borean
executiveWilliam here. Let me remind everyone that our Life investment results refer to the non-VFA business. That non-VFA business is plainly tied to certain specific operations we hold, though it also includes portfolio segments that are running off. The Czech Republic portfolio comes to mind, since it has a run-off character on top of what I mentioned earlier. So we hold to that figure. I've always said that whenever these estimates are produced, we aim for a conservative one. Still, I believe the EUR 900 million reflects things well, also because the movement of excess capital in Argentina from Life into P&C amounts to just EUR 30 million as an annual drag. That's the outlook. And keep in mind what I told you regarding the non-VFA, the other growth component with the change in Asia, in China, which brings a higher unwinding of the embedded cost and guarantees.
Marco Sesana
executiveYes. Hi, William. So perhaps to return to what we plan to do in 2025. Obviously, as you're aware, we anticipate the whole external environment will be somewhat volatile. As a result, we intend to cut back on those commercial incentives. But we'll examine quarter by quarter how much can be done. We want to ensure we're strong when it comes to value creation. So we'll see how that can be lowered. Thus we do expect to reduce it. And by the way, under the new methodologies for this number, this will remain broadly unchanged. But we do anticipate they will bring it down, though we'll be tactical in understanding how much the environment is shifting and how much we're able to do.
Philippe Donnet
executiveHi, William. Regarding BTPs, I noted that exposure dropped substantially from the close of 2023 to the close of 2024, going from EUR 38.5 billion down to EUR 35.6 million. I also mentioned that we're exploring stepping up our BTP purchases. I made no comment on BTP exposure itself, since that falls under strategic asset allocation. Marco, perhaps you'd like to add something on that?
Marco Sesana
executiveRight, precisely. So, William, you'll recall from the planned presentation that we laid out what the principal direction of our strategic asset allocation is. As you remember, we noted that the allocation to govies would be kept. But broadly speaking, over the medium term we want to lower our exposure to govies. We'd like to raise it somewhat — tactically increase it — but as time goes on, our exposure to private markets, meaning private equity and private credit especially. So that direction hasn't changed. Obviously, we have set out a plan-horizon direction. Clearly, this will shift in line with external conditions, and it may be fine-tuned or tweaked a little across the various quarters. So we've simply laid out the general direction for our medium-term strategic asset allocation.
Operator
operatorGian Luca Ferrari from Mediobanca has the next question.
Gianluca Ferrari
analystThree questions from me, if I may. First, on credit spread sensitivities: I saw that they rose fairly substantially, especially for the CSM, and I wanted to ask whether that ties to the average rating of the credit book, or whether there's some other reason behind it? Second, regarding the CSM of Switzerland: could you give us some color on the 30% decline in that line? And finally, on a direct insurance company that's up for sale in Italy — I believe in Venice — you've been quite clear that M&A is not the top priority of the new plan, so I was wondering whether you're looking at that file, or whether it doesn't interest you.
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Luca. Cristiano will take the first 2 questions on the CSM, and Philippe will handle the third one.
Cristiano Borean
executiveOn credit spread sensitivities, honestly, no single factor stands out as the main one when it comes to how the book is rated. Another thing worth bearing in mind is really the sensitivity to government spreads, which showed up in the CSM — you've seen that knock the CSM down by a material EUR 0.3 billion to EUR 0.4 billion in the quarter alone. So I'd stress instead that there aren't really any particular issues or specific topics tied to the nongovernment credit distribution. As for the Switzerland CSM, there is a specific point to raise again there. You have a combined effect from lower base interest rates and widening spreads versus the government versus the swap rate, and that swap rate is the baseline used to evaluate liabilities under both IFRS 17 and solvency. That produces a sort of leverage effect on this movement, which, by the way, for your information, came at the highest level of bifurcation between the government and swap spread rate we've observed there, and it also had some effect on the local gap, because of the way you're producing it in the result — reminding you that our Swiss business, which remains there, despite good ALM, also has a long-standing nature.
Cristiano Borean
executiveThe government's sensitivity to swap spreads is extremely elevated right now, because the matching depends on it—a peculiar feature, if you'll permit me, of both IFRS 17 and solvency—but all of us are seeing this period of full decoupling between government bond movements in rates and the swap rate, which is a collateralized baseline rate; that is why this deviation is showing up. I think those are the main explanations for that as well.
Philippe Donnet
executiveTurning to your third question, I’d like to start by recalling that under our new plan we’ve made it quite clear that our approach to M&A is very strict and disciplined, since we will measure any opportunity against share buybacks. Beyond that, we don’t comment on particular speculation. And as you might expect, we’re very pleased with our footprint and our distribution in Italy.
Operator
operatorOur following question comes from Hadley Cohen at Morgan Stanley.
Hadley Cohen
analystTwo questions, if I may. First, thanks for the additional detail on the average coupon for 2024 redemptions — I believe it was 1.3%, which you contrasted with the 3.6% reinvestment rate. Could you give us a sense of how you're thinking, or how we ought to think, about the average coupon on redemptions for 2025, please? Presumably we should still expect investment income to keep moving higher from here? Then the second question, which ties somewhat to what Will asked earlier, I think, but it's helpful to see the EUR 2 billion of net flows in the fourth quarter in Italy, roughly split, I believe, between unit-linked and savings business. Could you update us on how flows have looked in the early part of this year? I suppose I'm asking in the context of bond yields moving higher — not quite as high as in '22, '23 — but how should we think about the risk of lapses ticking up again?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Hadley. Perhaps we could begin with the second question, which is for Giulio, on how Life performed in the first quarter, while the first question is obviously meant for Cristiano.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveLooking at flows overall, we’re clearly seeing positive inflows as we enter the year. In Italy specifically, we’re essentially at breakeven, though that’s a much stronger position than where we were at the start of last year. From that angle, it makes sense that after such a solid close to 2024, momentum would naturally be somewhat lower. That said, in Italy right now, we’re quite confident that things will also improve as the year progresses. Assuming conditions remain as they are, we anticipate 2025 will deliver a flow figure in Italy that aligns with the 2024 level. We’ve gotten off to a good start this year, since it’s clear the headwinds we faced at the outset of 2024 are largely behind us.
Cristiano Borean
executiveYes, Hadley, on the redemption side for Life, we're looking at roughly 3.2% in 2025. And as an average — sorry — for the group, that breaks down as 3.5% in Life and 2.2% in P&C. So those are the 2 main drivers you should pay closer attention to rather than the average itself.
Operator
operatorFahad Changazi from Kepler Cheuvreux has the next question.
Fahad Changazi
analystI have two questions, if I may. On the underlying loss ratio, the outlook sounds encouraging. However, what can you say about the expense ratio for 2025? My understanding was that the shift in the mix between non-motor and motor would affect acquisition costs. But does that still apply in 2025, considering we anticipate some growth in motor premiums? And my second question concerns Solvency II Life in-force returns. Could you provide some indication of how that will evolve in 2025, given the lower swap rates?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Fahad. Both of those questions are directed to Cristiano.
Cristiano Borean
executiveYes. So to begin with, whenever we examine how the expense ratio evolved during the year, keep in mind that this particular year was distinctly shaped by what we call the Liberty effect. As you're aware, there's this purchase price starting point, and within it sits the split between the loss ratio and the expense ratio. If I simply strip out the Liberty effect, the expense ratio for the year would come down by 0.1%, that is 10 bps compared with the 30 we are reporting. So that gives you a cleaner base for projecting from next year onward, and it would still carry a double effect, one we already flagged at the Investor Day. Bear in mind that under the '25, '27 plan, we are pushing a larger share of non-motor growth in high-growth markets such as Asian countries like India, where acquisition costs run higher, and non-motor itself also carries higher acquisition cost, which in the mix does not materially alter what you should anticipate for 2025 relative to what we delivered in 2024 once adjusted for Liberty. Then, if I understand the question -- or the second question regarding Life in-force given where rates have moved, we ought to see lower unwinding, meaning roughly EUR 0.2 billion less of an effect coming from that unwinding.
Cristiano Borean
executiveObviously, expansion of the business and the better profitability that comes from it will serve as an offsetting factor.
Operator
operatorRhea Shah from Deutsche Bank has the next question.
Rhea Shah
analystI've got two questions. First, returning to P&C and the loss ratio gain you recorded in '24 — you noted it came from both tariff strengthening and other technical measures. Could you break out the split between those 2 figures, and then how we ought to think about it as we move into 2025? Second, on Holding and Other, what would be a reasonable normalized guide for the other businesses? It was EUR 250 million in 2023 and EUR 157 million in 2024 — how should we think about that going forward?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Rhea. Giulio, the first question is yours, and Cristiano, the second one is for you.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveOn that first question, providing an exact split is always difficult. I'd say that in any case, most of the improvement clearly comes from the tariff increases we're pushing through. But take frequency, for instance, which is going down — that may result from the general trend, yet it also reflects the underwriting actions we're taking. So splitting it out is always a somewhat complicated exercise. For the time being, though, I'd say most of the improvement currently stems from the rate environment. I'd expect that to hold as we move into 2025 as well. And then, clearly, when we think about the last portion of the improvement we want to achieve, it most likely comes now from rate increases or inflation, but more from the pruning and the claims initiatives that were put in place. So when I think about the timeline, price strength is the major driver of improvement right now. And when we think about the planning at the back end of the plan, clearly the initiatives we've put in place will help us reach our targets.
Giulio Terzariol
executiveCorrect, yes, on that item.
Cristiano Borean
executiveRhea, on your second question. First, regarding holding and other, when we discuss it within the other segment, that's correct, because in that element you always need to factor in the consolidation adjustment impact from the infra group dividend — the one that this year produced EUR 60 million more in consolidation adjustment, since there was EUR 60 million less in infra group dividend, which we're addressing and projecting that 2024 is a good run rate number versus 2023, which benefited positively from some excess capital repatriation on, for instance, the asset management component I mentioned earlier in preparation for the upcoming deal. So I'd say 2024 is a far more representative figure, also because we have minor businesses within it that are interest rate dependent, and the 2024 interest rate environment aligns much more closely with the one seen in 2025 than with the one in 2023, which was much, much higher and was potentially delivering a small benefit from that.
Operator
operatorAnd the next question comes as a follow-up from Michael Huttner at Berenberg.
Michael Huttner
analystI consider myself quite fortunate. So I'll be quite brief. Only a single question. On capital generation, a remarkable figure, EUR 4.8 billion, 21% for the group expanding at your pace, that's an exceptional figure. You're considerably ahead of the goal of reaching EUR 14 billion under the upcoming 3-year plan. Could you shed some light on what is behind this enormous beat?
Cristiano Borean
executiveYes, Michael. So, clearly, as we were already discussing at Investor Day, we confirm that our view on capital generation also factors in a certain margin of prudence, given the adverse potential scenario that we can always face. So by the way, I think that EUR 4.5 billion is a good starting point to project from, but clearly, the improvement we can expect if we stabilize the environment also on the interest rate for the collection as well as the expected direction where we are going with the contribution of the P&C. Don't forget that this year, we were, in any case, having a bad natural catastrophe. So -- and we do put into capital generation only the current year, contrary to -- I know what's normal maybe in the market; we are quite more conservative. I think that the 4.5% is really a lower-end level onto which to project going forward. And the beat was also given by a good financial segment result where we have different topics, including our financial holding of the asset management, wealth management, but including also a positive development in some business treated under Solvency I, which is our pension business in France.
Operator
operatorMoving on, we have a question from Steven Haywood at HSBC.
Steven Haywood
analystI have two questions. First, just to clarify your Solvency II position at the start of the year — have there been any significant changes since then, and is the EUR 500 million share buyback excluded from that ratio? Second, could you give us some indication of what is happening with the Italian government's review of the Natixis deal? Might there be any implications from that as well?
Fabio Cleva
executiveThanks a lot, Steven. Cristiano, you’ll take the first question, and Philippe, you’ll have the second one.
Cristiano Borean
executiveOn March 7th, our slide commentary included an expected Solvency II ratio of 214%. Incidentally, when I examine the sensitivity from March 7th through these recent days, nothing material has shifted, since there are movements up and down across various components. At this point, we already incorporate certain regulatory changes, such as the EIOPA curves and the impact of the Intermonte transaction on Banca Generali, while we are not incorporating the EUR 500 million buyback, which will be put to the general shareholder meeting for proposal, because 2 steps must first be completed before it can be accounted for or deducted. First, approval by the general shareholder meeting; second, approval by the regulator. Only at that point do we have authorization to deduct it from own funds as a rule.
Philippe Donnet
executiveSteven, on Natixis there isn't really anything new to report. We're currently in the midst of the union consultations, as the law requires and as we agreed in our memorandum of understanding. That consultation will likely run for another 2 months, and there's no further update beyond that.
Operator
operator<<operator_script>> Sirs, no further questions have come in at this point. I'll hand the conference back over to you for any closing comments.
Fabio Cleva
executiveAppreciate that, operator. That brings our call on the 2024 full-year results to a close. Thank you all for joining us. As always, the Investor Relations team is entirely available to help with anything you need afterward. Have a good rest of your day. Goodbye.
Operator
operatorThank you for being with us, everyone. That brings the conference to a close, so you're welcome to hang up your phones now.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. transcript — plus 133,000+ transcripts from 7,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. earnings transcripts and 133,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $39.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.
More tools for stock research
OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A. or any ticker on your watchlist.
StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.