Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation (AUB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 14, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Banks conference_presentation 40 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#1

Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Eugene Koysman, and I cover U.S. banks along with my colleague, Jason Goldberg, here at Barclays. Welcome to the Atlantic Union Bankshares fireside chat at our conference. And with us today are the CEO, John Asbury; CFO, Rob Gorman; and Head of Investor Relations, Bill Cimino. Before we begin, I wanted to remind the audience that our automated response questions are available on the left side of the screen under the About tab. You can cast your vote on these questions anytime. And you can also submit your own questions by clicking on the Questions tab on the left. We'll go over the ARS results and the audience-submitted questions during the presentation, time permitting. With that, I'll turn it over to Bill Cimino, Head of Investor Relations.

William Cimino

executive
#2

Thanks, Eugene, and thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Wanted to note up front that we have filed an updated investor presentation on September 9 that we'll refer to on the webcast today. That investor presentation, if you don't have it, is available to download on our investor website, investors.atlanticunionbank.com. During the call today, we may comment on our financial performance using both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Important information about these non-GAAP financial measures, including reconciliations to comparable GAAP measures, is included in the back of the investor presentation. I'd like to remind everyone that on today's call, we will make forward-looking statements, which are not statements of historical fact and are subject to risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that actual performance will not differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, and we undertake no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statement. Please refer to our SEC filings for a further discussion of the company's risk factors and other important information regarding our forward-looking statements, including factors that could cause actual results to differ. All comments made during today's call are subject to that safe harbor statement. And Eugene, back over to you.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#3

Thank you. I wanted to set the stage for our discussion today by asking, what are you seeing in your footprint in terms of the economic activity amid the slowdown for the pandemic?

John Asbury

executive
#4

Eugene, it's more resilient than we would have expected at this point. If you look across Virginia, the unemployment rate as of the month of July was 8%. Now that will be updated next week. At that point in time, I think the national unemployment rate was 10.2%. We now know the national unemployment rate is 8%, and we generally run a couple of hundred basis points below that. So I would expect unemployment is somewhere in the low 7% range. There's clearly been a pickup in just economic activity. It's plainly evident just from being out and about. Verizon is reporting that there's actually more movement by people holding their cellphones going on in Virginia right now than there was before COVID-19 hit. And so we're clearly seeing things picking up, which is encouraging, and that we're seeing it show up in terms of the deposit base of the bank. We estimate about 40% of the PPP funds that we distributed, and we did a lot, $1.7 billion, are effectively still on deposit in client accounts. It doesn't mean that they're not spending it, but it means that there's more cash coming into those accounts than is going out or at least less cash going out than we would have expected. So overall, based on what we're seeing right now, we're feeling a little better than we would have expected.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#5

Thank you. And how does that view of the economy and especially the 7% unemployment that you mentioned, how does that feed into the factors that shape your provision? And especially, how does that compare with the factors that you use to build the provision in the second quarter? And -- go ahead.

John Asbury

executive
#6

Yes. The CECL reserve was informed by the Moody's baseline forecast. And we, of course, have that for Virginia. Now for those who know us, we are mostly a Virginia bank, modest operations in North Carolina and Maryland, but principally in Virginia. The Moody's baseline forecast that we used assumed a long-term sustained unemployment rate of 7%. And Rob Gorman can comment further on this. Rob, I think we saw that happening close to year-end -- or at least Moody's did. So we're running ahead of schedule. And you can pick it up from there.

Robert Gorman

executive
#7

Yes, that's right, John. Yes, we're running a bit ahead of schedule. We haven't seen the actual August unemployment rate yet. That will come out next week here in Virginia. But we do expect it to be a bit better than that 7% assumption that we had when we were running our CECL model in the June quarter. Certainly, the unemployment rate has a high correlation to loan losses and the loss content. And that would be a favorable outcome, if that were the case, that the employment was lower. Of course, we don't know exactly what's going to happen. There's a lot of uncertainty. Of course, we haven't seen any of the normal traditional credit metrics deteriorate, past dues or charge-offs through this date anyway. So it's a wait and see in terms of what the loss content will be going forward. That said, we have built up our loan loss reserve significantly in the first 2 quarters of this year. At this point, I would expect with an improving outlook that we would not expect to see continued build in the third quarter, again, assuming that the outlook looks a bit better. However, certainly wouldn't expect that there would be any change to the positive -- there will be certainly no release of reserves just because of the uncertainty still out there, and we haven't seen those losses manifest themselves and how they will manifest themselves going forward.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#8

That's pretty informative. So effectively, provision to cover the charge-offs and potentially the impact of loan growth, right? Is that fair enough?

Robert Gorman

executive
#9

Exactly. Exactly. That's right, Eugene.

John Asbury

executive
#10

And Eugene, we had stated when we released Q2 earnings that we expected to begin to see evidence of credit problems in Q3. We have not seen that yet. And so at this point, we'd amend that comment to say we would expect to see some evidence of this beginning to happen in Q4, but we don't see it yet. Obviously, to some extent -- to a great extent, this will be a function of what's going on with COVID, how long we're under social distancing. But if businesses are resilient, people are resilient, they're out and they're about. Virginia has been one of the relatively more conservative states in terms of dealing with this. It's not lost on us that the governor of Virginia happens to be a physician, the only medical doctor in the country who is also a governor. So therefore, we've taken a relatively conservative stance. But I'm happy that we took that approach because what it means is that we've been able to manage the contagion reasonably well here in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and that has positive impacts on the economy and on us.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#11

Got it. And how much of that change in your view of charge-offs is informed by the government stimulus, do you think?

John Asbury

executive
#12

Well, there's no -- it's hard to say, but there's no question whatsoever that the government stimulus has helped. Again, you think about the unemployment rate, to us, being at 8%, which is what we were when last reported, is exceptionally high. We had been in the 3% range. But the $600 a month COVID supplement to unemployment meant, in many cases, the types of people whose jobs have been impacted were actually earning more on unemployment than they were when they were working. Now that's ended, of course. But if you think about the tremendous amount of liquidity that's been pumped into the system, the Paycheck Protection Program certainly served as a bridge for many businesses. We did 11,679 PPP loans for $1.7 billion, vast majority of which were in Virginia, 85% of which were under $150,000. These types of programs have clearly had an impact. And again, the unemployment benefit certainly helped to bridge, and we've not really seen the slowdown in spending that we would have expected as a result. We'll see where this goes from here.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#13

Got it. And now that you think the higher charge-offs are coming closer to the fourth quarter, when and what level do you think your charge-offs could peak for the overall book? And then maybe you can talk to specific areas that are of concern, for example, the areas that you've outlined that are impacted by the pandemic or the third-party consumer book, which used to comprise the majority of the losses before the pandemic hit.

John Asbury

executive
#14

Yes. Well, in terms of when, I don't see that happening this calendar year. So I would think that charge-offs would peak sometime in the early part of next year. Whether that's Q1 or Q2, time will tell. And again, it's going to be a function of the severity of COVID-19, how long until we receive a vaccine, how many people are actually willing to take it and just how well we're able to manage social distancing. But it's awfully quiet right now as we look at the credit front, and we're almost at the end of Q3. So it feels like it's going to take more time to develop. Rob, you'll have to -- in terms of what we would say in terms of how much, I think the truth is, it's impossible to predict. We certainly model it. In the context of CECL, how would you answer that question?

Robert Gorman

executive
#15

Yes. So in terms of the modeling, what we're suggesting is over an 8-quarter period of time, we would probably be in the -- the CECL allowance, that's 1.42%, which is an outlook for losses over that 8-quarter period. So to John's point, I think what we'll see is not peaking obviously in this year but probably peaking in the second quarter of next year. And then we'll see where we are from there. That's our current outlook at this point in time.

John Asbury

executive
#16

Yes. We do feel incrementally better than we would have, say, when we released Q2 earnings for all the reasons that we described. I mean I still believe there will be a credit impact that will come. But as we sit here today, we certainly feel better than we expected to feel at this point.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#17

Yes. And can you give us an update on how are the specific parts of your portfolio holding up? Any issues there?

John Asbury

executive
#18

Yes. I think the loan deferral data is a pretty good indicator. So currently, we have 6.7% of our loan portfolio on deferral. We updated the present -- the investor presentation last week. Only Slides 14 and 16 were changed to provide current deferral data. So about halfway down on the right, you can see, excluding PPP loans, which we believe is the correct way to look at it, we're at 6.7% on deferral. Now if you look at the second bullet point beneath that, we had $828 million of commercial loans roll off their initial 90-day deferral period, of which only 10% -- actually, a little less than 10%, $80 million rolled into a second deferral. And by the way, half of that $80 million were actually hotels. What happened is initially, as we were doing all deferrals on 90 days, we quickly decided that for the hotel portfolio, which I'll come back to in a moment, it was more sensible to put them on a 6-month deferral because it seemed evident to us that they would end up on 6-month deferral. So what that really means is that the referral -- the re-deferral rate is even lower still if you exclude those hotels. So that looks encouraging from our standpoint. Third bullet point down is interesting. We had $302 million of modifications we have been reporting that never happened. And what that was about is that we were crazy busy in the month of April and May with the Paycheck Protection Program. And so as we were having discussions with clients at approving deferral requests, in some cases, we asked them to go ahead and make their payments in April and sometimes May, and we would get them processed and put them onto the system. In between the time we agreed to the deferral and when we were ready to book it, they contacted us and said, "We don't need it after all." So that's certainly a good sign. We expect that there is a very large cohort of deferrals that will be coming through in the month of October. And so we'll see what happens. But I would say that the deferral business will be over pretty shortly from here. We'll have more to say about this, of course, when we release Q3 earnings. And Bill, if you'll jump over to Slide 16 very quickly to Eugene's question. If you think about the COVID-sensitive industries, these are the ones that we think are most impacted. I'll begin with hotels. Hotels, it's the largest exposure category. You could see it's about 4.8% of the total loan portfolio. The good news about the hotels is that all commercial real estate product types, this is the category that had the best metrics going into this. Lowest loan-to-value ratio for any of the portfolios in commercial real estate at 60%. That's important because it means that there's cushion or buffer to absorb deferred payments and a diminishment of valuation. Secondly, it had the highest debt service coverage ratio going in, 1.9x. Now that's no longer true, of course, but it was a strong portfolio going in. These are all limited service, almost everyone flagged. We're not doing airport hotels, convention hotels, conference hotels, something you would look at as a resort hotel. They're all in our footprint. They're owned and operated by people that we know that operate in the footprint. So we feel like it's a quality portfolio, good properties, good locations, good operators. And it should be able to withstand the impact as they climb their way back and effectively restabilize. Now notice the hotel deferral rate is currently at 28% of the portfolio. And that would be down from over -- I'll give you the exact number. At the end of last quarter, that was 52.7%. So we've seen an improvement there. I certainly worry about the restaurant portfolio. The good news is it's small. You can see that it's 1.6% of the portfolio. 21% of that is on deferral currently. That was 45% when we released earnings. And notice that it's 80% secured by real estate. So these are all in-footprint. We're not doing leveraged lending, national franchise-type programs. And the good news is it at least has collateral. And the restaurants have been certainly among the most impacted, but it's a very modest exposure in the whole scheme of things. Retail trade is holding up quite well. We're down to 6.5% under deferral. That was 16% at the end of Q2. And if you look at that exposure amount, 3.5% of the loan portfolio, half of that is either convenience stores with gas or auto dealers where we finance showrooms. Those businesses never stopped and seem to be doing okay right now. And we have very little incidence of exposure to what you would most worry about, boutique shops like menswear, jewelry stores, et cetera. And in fact, some of the retail trade clients are actually doing very well, sporting goods, garden centers, et cetera. So a modest exposure. Not particularly worried about health care. We would expect pretty much all of that will come off deferral pretty quickly now. And notice senior living deferrals have gone to 0. So yes, this is the most impacted portfolio. And while we are sure that we will eventually have challenges in the portfolio, we're feeling pretty good about it overall.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#19

That's really interesting. You mentioned that your next big chunk of loans that are coming off the deferrals is in October. Is there a breakout? How different is that bunch or batch from what we've seen to date? Is there a bigger component in CRE? Or what do we look for there?

John Asbury

executive
#20

Yes. I think that certainly, the hotel portfolio that -- what this means is that the hotels that were on deferral, that are still on deferral, that's going to mature as we get into mostly the month of October. The deferral activity really peaked in April, and there was some going on even into May. There wasn't much going on in March. Again, the point being that we were simultaneously managing the overwhelming demand for Paycheck Protection Program with all of the conversations that were happening with these borrowers. The rest of it is pretty well distributed. So pretty much everything you're looking at here on this slide, Eugene, that's going to be coming up pretty shortly. Beyond that, it's pretty well distributed.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#21

Right. And for the hotels that went off the deferral status versus the ones that are staying on, what's the difference primarily there as well?

John Asbury

executive
#22

Well, I think it's really a function of where are they located, what their occupancies are and to some extent, maybe a function of what the debt service is and also the wherewithal of the operator. If you look at market data on hotel occupancy across Virginia, which again is where not all but most of this exposure is, hotel occupancies are probably in the 40-something percent range. There are certain markets where it's much stronger. If you were to go into Virginia Beach because of the strong summer that they've had, you'd see occupancies that are closer to the 70% range. Certain small rural markets could be in the 20% or 30%, and we tend to not have exposure in markets like that. So it's just a function of where are they operating vis-à-vis their breakeven. We do survey our hotel operators. So we have good granular data in terms of average daily rates, occupancy, breakeven rates, et cetera. And again, we're seeing, I believe, the hotels are holding up fairly well. They generally -- by nature of what we're financing, they're not reliant upon restaurant operations, bar operations. They don't have large staffs. Again, these are typically limited-service hotels. They will need to restabilize. And what I mean by that is that as they come off their deferrals, the business presumably will continue to slowly pick back up toward a more normalized rate. And we'll have to be mindful in terms of what is their capacity to pay. If someone needs some sort of loan restructuring when the deferral ends, we'll be looking at the availability of additional capital, et cetera. But the single best news on it is we have a pretty low loan-to-value on the portfolio, as I indicated, 60%. So there is adequate buffer or room to accept the deferrals without getting the loan-to-value out of line.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#23

Thank you. I wanted to pivot from credit to another topic that's very much of interest to investors, and that specifically is loan growth. We've seen significant inflow of PPP loans. But can you talk to what you're seeing in terms of organic loan growth and client risk appetite? Is there any interest? And are there also pockets of strength anywhere geographically and across the industries?

John Asbury

executive
#24

Yes. I would -- there are. So overall, because of what we're seeing going on, businesses have been quite conservative and are generally arresting their investment and they're also flush with cash for the same reason that we're seeing cash build in their business operating accounts, and we've seen them pay down lines. We are seeing -- we would expect to see what I would think would be low single-digit growth in the commercial loan categories for the full year. We're certainly seeing that right now. Revolving credits are up and down. Sometimes they're up. Sometimes they're down. It's just a function of what their working capital needs are. And by the way, we saw some borrowers apply PPP funding to outstanding revolving lines of credit. It's the first thing you would do. If you had a revolver and you took on a PPP loan, first thing you should have done would have been to pay down your existing bank line because the PPP loan is less expensive. And so that suppressed our revolving credit outstandings. We are seeing a little bit of growth in pretty much all of the other commercial banking and commercial real estate categories, not much, but a little. Areas of strength would be the -- any -- really all of the government-contractor business in which we operate, they are quite busy. And so we've seen them perform very well. The Equipment Finance Division, which we started over a year ago, has performed very well. And it's playing exactly out as we had hoped it would, whether leveraging our franchise and/or finding opportunity. So we're seeing better-than-expected growth there. And on the consumer side, the only category that's showing any growth would be indirect lending, which is all done in our footprint. It's not much in the whole scheme of things, but we are seeing some growth there. Everything else consumer is in paydown mode. So we're seeing home equity lines of credit come down because consumers have built cash and they're paying down HELOCs. Mortgages are coming down on the balance sheet. We don't have a lot, but there's a heavy refinance rate going on for those that we do have. You mentioned third-party lending earlier. We would expect the lending club balance, which is the one that we've been most focused on that's in liquidation, to drop below the $70 million figure by the end of Q3. And frankly, it's performing quite well. So the modest growth that we're seeing in commercial will likely be largely offset by a decline in balances in the consumer categories. And you'll see a very low loan growth amount for the full year, excluding PPP, of course. Next year, as we get into perhaps the second half of next year, we have no reason to believe that the franchise is not capable of producing organically mid-single-digit growth. Rob, do you have anything to add to that?

Robert Gorman

executive
#25

No, I would agree with that. That's what our outlook looks like at the moment. You've shared on the indirect lending. What John was referring to is we have an indirect auto portfolio of a little over $300 million. That's grown quite nicely. A lot of second -- or used-car lending going on there. And that market's actually had an uptick in valuations. So -- but otherwise, yes, it's basically a commercial kind of low to mid-single-digit growth offset by the runoff in consumer net runoff in this amount.

John Asbury

executive
#26

And Eugene, one thing I'll add, strategically speaking, something that encourages us is the performance that we had on the Paycheck Protection Program. If you look at the state of Virginia, the #1 lender for PPP was Truist, which is really 2 banks, isn't it? It's SunTrust plus BB&T. They did 6 more by count than we did in the state of Virginia. They're 25% depository market share. We're 7%. This was a huge brand builder for us. We had about 3,000 new-to-bank clients come in through PPP. And they were almost -- well, I would say the vast majority of them were coming out of the larger institutions, many of which were being turned away or gave up on SunTrust and BB&T, and of course, Wells Fargo, particularly. And so that -- we feel good about that. We're obviously working those businesses. Many of those don't borrow, which is fine, but we'll take those deposits. It certainly helped us in terms of the bank's reputation. It has damaged the reputation of the larger institutions. Truist is a disruption that's going to play out for a couple of years. It's been very slow to happen on the consumer side. It will probably be early 2022 before we see them put up the Truist brand and consolidate branches fully, but that is already underway on the commercial side. So we are chipping away at Truist. Watch Wells Fargo with their $10 billion expense-reduction initiative. We are having lots of feedback coming out of our contacts at Wells Fargo about job eliminations, the movement of many clients into more of a centralized 1-800 management group out of Charlotte. That is not going to play well in a market like Virginia. And I'll tell you, Wells Fargo, to their credit, has done a good job of holding on to their commercial bankers, holding on to their commercial clients. But if they begin job eliminations, which are starting, and as they move very large segments of their commercial book into a centralized management, that will be a perfect setup for us, remembering our whole strategy is one that is built to take market share from the large institutions. Truist is #1 in Virginia, 25% depository market share. Wells Fargo is #2, 16% depository market share. Then comes BofA. Then comes us. So this is a perfect setup for us to really execute the strategy.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#27

So this is actually a pretty good segue to a strategy question. I recall earlier this year, you seem to have pivoted away from aggressively going after Truist in an effort to chip away at their market share. And is now the right time to get back? And is that a change in your view from earlier?

John Asbury

executive
#28

Well, I wouldn't say we ever stopped. The single -- we had what we often referred to as Project Sundown, which was our focused area to take advantage of the Truist disruption. What did change is we expected this would have been the year when -- or next year would be the year when they would really begin to consolidate their consumer branches. They have 270 branches within 2 miles of each other in Virginia. What we learned is that Virginia was at the back of the queue. They'll consolidate Virginia last. Why? Because they have the most overlap of any state in their system here, and they wanted to get it right. And for various reasons, including COVID, they have slowed down their conversion schedule. So some of the planned strategies on the consumer side, we have held back on. If you're a client or a consumer customer of BB&T and SunTrust, there's a good chance you have no idea that they've merged and it's already happened because they're acting independently. We do -- we are hearing that they are likely to begin branch consolidations early in the new year. So maybe we'll see more disruption pick up on the consumer side. On the commercial side though, we never slowed down. And so we continued a very targeted effort there. And again, I would say that the best thing that ever happened for Project Sundown is the PPP because there are many, many clients who receive letters from BB&T and SunTrust, telling them that they weren't going to be able to get to them or they need to look elsewhere. And those letters came late in the first round of funding. Clients were furious. I have hundreds of letters from new clients of our company coming out of those institutions talking about their stories. So again, I'm not -- don't mean to disparage that fine company, but I'm simply pointing out that there's going to be opportunity here. Our whole business model is one of really taking away market share from these large institutions over time. Never say it would happen overnight, but we have some pretty darn good new clients in this institution today as a result of those efforts and even more so due to the PPP, which is good.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#29

Another strategy question. Can you share how has the pandemic changed your view of the bank and banking? What strategic changes are you anticipating making once we're on the other side of the pandemic?

John Asbury

executive
#30

Yes, it's a great question. We've said from March internally, externally, there are 2 things happening here that are very different and very significant. First is obviously the pandemic, the incident response and all of the implications, including ultimate credit impacts. And our strategy is take care of our customers, take care of our people, our teammates and batten down the hatches to prepare for what we expect to be an eventual credit storm. Having said that, COVID-19, tough as it is, is transitory. It doesn't feel like it, but this will eventually pass. And when it passes, we're going to be left with the next great challenge, which is the near-zero interest rate environment for 3 to 5 years. And that has lots of implications long after COVID. And so what that means is we had to align the expense structure of the bank to the new revenue reality. We began to take action on that in the first quarter, in fact, and you could see evidence of it in Q2, for sure. We, this week, are closing just under 10% of our branch network. And you saw expenses come down over the course of Q2. By the end of this month versus the end of March, we will have reduced our employee headcount by 6.2%. So we've been pretty aggressive in taking action, not waiting on a new environment to come but trying to get ahead of it, understanding that lower for longer is here for many, many years and we have to align the expense structure to the new reality. We are not saying we're done with those actions but we have taken aggressive actions. And then digital, we've seen a change in consumer behavior. I actually think COVID is going to accelerate it. It's made things that were going to happen, happen faster. And from our standpoint, we have continued the investment in digital. I think we demonstrated it in stage with PPP when we stood up the online application portal and the automated workflow system in 5 days. I don't think we could have done that in this company a year ago. We have a quarterly release schedule where we're updating our digital applications. And I think that we will need to continue the investment in digital, and part of the way that we pay for it is by continuing the rationalization of the branch network, and you align resources with opportunity. And so I don't see that changing. I think that, that is a secular or permanent shift that's gone on in terms of consumer behavior.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#31

Thank you. I actually wanted to go to the audience question that just came in. Would you share your thoughts on the consolidation opportunities in Virginia? Are there smaller banks thinking of sale? And is there an incentive to get deals completed before any potential change in political or regulatory environment in November?

John Asbury

executive
#32

Yes. I think -- so those are all good questions. I think that this is the perfect setup for further consolidation of the industry. And I think it's mostly a function of the pressure that's going to be applied to the banks in terms of net interest margin. If you accept that we'll have a near-zero rate environment for 3 to 5 years, which is our view, if you believe that to be true, and you run the forecast and we're running it, you can see what that looks like, which is why you've seen us start early on expense reduction. Also, if you believe that we've seen a secular change in consumer behavior, and the expectations are greater than ever before for digital products, alternative delivery, you're going to have to be able to invest in that. And if you assume the economy is going to be more sluggish than it would have been otherwise, all of this, I think, is going to create a great -- a push towards more consolidation so that we can extract cost, and it's going to argue for more scale. Now I'm not too worried for a bank our size about the change in the regulatory environment and outlook. I actually think that's more of a problem for the largest of institutions. One can make a pretty good argument that that's what brought BB&T and SunTrust to the altar, when they came to the altar, trying to get ahead of a potential change in administration and potentially a different regulatory outlook. I think that's less of an issue for the smaller institutions in my opinion. So I don't think that's going to stop consolidation among smaller banks. I think it could create a problem if you try to put 2 more super regionals together in that sort of environment. I think the real constraint right now is that it seems reasonable to us, and we can only speak for our view, that you really need to see what is asset quality going to do. I know there are some smaller MOE types going on among smaller institutions right now. But from our standpoint, it feels too much like a bet-the-bank move to be thinking about M&A until we have more clarity on asset quality. We feel very good and confident about our asset quality, but we need to prove it. We need to prove that it is what we expect it to be. We need to demonstrate that. And at the same time, any potential target, they need to prove as well what their asset quality is and how well they will have fared through this. So I personally think, that may be proven wrong, but I personally think that we'll be pretty well into next year before you'll see any real uptick in some of the larger -- not true small community banks but midsized banks like us. And then I think that you could see that ball begin to get rolling because I think the environment is really going to argue for it. As we look across Virginia, yes, we see further consolidation opportunity. We have a strong brand here. We're #4 in depository market share. We have tremendous scarcity value. And so from our standpoint, there's nothing that's more attractive than continuing to be a consolidator in Virginia. The challenge given the size of the bank today as a nearly-$20-billion bank is that even the size of acquisitions that we've done more recently, which were in the $3 billion range, begin to look small and less impactful incrementally. And so that argues for us to think about is there something that could be larger, and there may or may not be those opportunities, but we still say Virginia is choice 1 as we think about potential consolidation. And we would never do anything that didn't make financial or strategic sense, as we've demonstrated.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#33

So thank you. And we have just a few minutes left. I wanted to touch on some housekeeping items. Specifically, can you talk to your net interest margin outlook? I think you talked to core NIM stabilizing in the 3.15%, 3.20% range compared to 3.15% last quarter. Have you seen anything that changes that view, especially the rates staying low? And also, if you can talk to the impact of PPP on NII, if that's end of the year, even early next year impact in terms of forgiveness?

Robert Gorman

executive
#34

Yes. Eugene, in terms of the net interest margin on the core side, again, core being defined as not including the PPP impact, which we know hopefully, loans will be forgiven and we'll take in the deferred fees over, what we expect, over the fourth and first quarters. Basically, it's got delayed. We thought we'd see some this quarter, but that doesn't look likely. So we're looking at the fourth and first quarter for the majority of those fees to come through on an accelerated basis. We are accreting those into income over a 24-month period, but we'll be able to accelerate those fees once forgiveness comes through from the SBA. But in terms of the overall core NIM, excluding PPP, we do expect and are sticking to about the 3.15%, the 3.20% stabilization of that core margin. We do expect to see a bit of earning asset yield compression, but we feel comfortable that, that can be offset with further reductions in our cost of funds, primarily in the cost of deposits. We've been very aggressive in reducing our deposit rates. We do have some more room to reduce those. We have about $100 million of high-cost CDs running off per month over the next 8 to 10 months. And just to give you a feel for that, those high-cost CDs on the books today are in the 1.7%, 1.8% range. And those are repricing to 30 basis points, primarily. We have a 1-year no-penalty CD product out there that's seeing money come in as CDs roll off. So that's a nice tailwind for us in terms of continuing to reduce debt, cost of funds, cost of deposit side, which hopefully will offset some of the earning asset yield compression we expect to see in the..

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#35

In lower-for-longer interest rate?

Robert Gorman

executive
#36

Yes.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#37

I think you also did some balance sheet funding actions that should help as well.

Robert Gorman

executive
#38

Right. Yes. That's exactly right, yes. Second quarter, we took some actions that is going to help, yes.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#39

Thank you. Sorry. Can you give us an update maybe on the fee income trends? I think you've talked to strong mortgage still, but I suspect consumer fees, deposit fees are still sluggish.

Robert Gorman

executive
#40

Yes, that's exactly right. From a mortgage perspective, we have -- continue to have strong mortgage performance as the rates continue to be low. This quarter should be a record quarter for us as we look at the first 2 months of the quarter and into the third month. We expect that, that will also continue a bit, we think, into the fourth quarter. We've got a nice pipeline there. In terms of the deposit service charges, you're right, it's been very sluggish from an overdraft point of view. And other service charge incidences are down primarily because we've got -- we're flush with deposits and part of that's the government stimulus checks that we've seen, unemployment checks that John had mentioned, the elevated checks that came through. We do expect that, that will be -- it's a bit better than the low point of second quarter. We expect that will continue to -- not quite get that to pre-COVID levels but will continue to improve over the next few quarters.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#41

Thank you. I think we're actually out of time at this point. So thank you very much for coming to the conference, and thank you for giving us the update.

John Asbury

executive
#42

And thanks for having us, Eugene. Be well.

Eugene Koysman

analyst
#43

All right. Take care.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.