Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc (ALKS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
October 22, 2025
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGreetings, and welcome to the Alkermes Investor Call. My name is Rob, and I'll be your operator for today's call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that the conference is being recorded. At this time, I'll turn the call over to Sandra Coombs, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Affairs. Sandy, you may now begin.
Sandra Coombs
executiveThank you. Good morning. Thank you for joining us on the call to discuss our agreement to acquire Avadel Pharmaceuticals. With me today are Richard Pops, our CEO; Joshua Reed, who recently joined us as Chief Financial Officer; and Blair Jackson, our Chief Operating Officer; who will join us for some Q&A at the conclusion of the call. In addition to our press release and Rule 2.7 announcement under Irish law, a slide presentation is available on the Investors section of alkermes.com. Our discussions during this conference call will include forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements. Please see Slide 5 of the accompanying presentation, our press release issued this morning and our most recent annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC for important risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise the information provided on this call or in the accompanying presentation as a result of new information or future results or developments. After our prepared remarks, we'll open the call for Q&A. As you may be aware, in light of our offer for Avadel, interactions with shareholders and others are now governed by the Irish takeover rules. As a result, Alkermes is restricted from what it can disclose beyond what is already disclosed in publicly available documentation relating to its offer. Therefore, we will not be in a position to answer certain questions relating to the proposed transaction, Avadel or our plans for the combined business beyond this. With that, I'll turn the call over to Richard.
Richard F. Pops
executiveThank you, Sandy. Good morning, everyone. So this morning, we announced that we've entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Avadel Pharmaceuticals, an all-cash transaction, which we expect to be immediately accretive upon closing. This is a very strategic acquisition for Alkermes. It's compelling from multiple perspectives. We gained an attractive new patented FDA-approved product, which will leverage and increase the scale of our profitable commercial business. And we immediately become a key player in the sleep medicine market in anticipation of our progress with alixorexton. Acquiring a business that's so well aligned with our current and long-term priorities has been one of our strategic objectives for some time. We believe that this combination positions Alkermes for enhanced growth, innovation and value creation. So before we dive into the specifics of the transaction, I'd like to take a moment for some additional context for today's announcement. Over the last several years, we've been disciplined in our approach to business development, evaluating a wide range of opportunities in search of one that could complement our therapeutic focus, our core capabilities, our advancing pipeline and our focus on profitability. Avadel, a commercial stage company, marketing a proven and differentiated narcolepsy medicine stood out, meeting all of our criteria strategically, operationally and financially. The timing of the transaction also underscores our confidence in alixorexton. With positive Phase II data for alixorexton in narcolepsy type 1 now in hand, data from Vibrance-2 and NT2 expected in November and plans to initiate a global Phase III program in narcolepsy early next year, we believe alixorexton has the potential to transform the treatment of narcolepsy. The acquisition of Avadel enables us to enter the sleep medicine market now and establish our presence in this space ahead of the potential launch of alixorexton. Avadel is a recognized innovator in sleep medicine. It's focused on addressing meaningful unmet needs for patients living with narcolepsy. Avadel's commercial product called LUMRYZ, is the first and only FDA-approved once-at-bedtime oxybate for the treatment of cataplexy or excessive daytime sleepiness in patients 7 years or older with narcolepsy. This differentiated profile eliminates the need for middle of the night dosing, which has long been a burden for patients and caregivers. Since launching LUMRYZ in 2023, we watched the Avadel team build and scale a high-performing commercial organization driving strong demand. New patient starts of LUMRYZ have outpaced the twice-nightly mixed salts competitor by more than 2:1 since launch, with approximately 3,100 patients on LUMRYZ therapy as of June 30 and an estimated 50,000 oxybate eligible patients in the U.S., LUMRYZ has been on a robust growth trajectory and has significant opportunity ahead. That momentum reflects not only the unmet need in the market, but also the strength of Avadel's commercial strategy, their capabilities and their team, and we look forward to welcoming Avadel employees to our organization and working together to build on their momentum. Our strong financial foundation, our expertise in CNS drug development and our proven ability to scale proprietary commercial products, including our sophisticated understanding of complex regulatory and market access dynamics position us to further support the growth of LUMRYZ. We believe LUMRYZ is an important therapeutic option and a strong addition to our portfolio in its own right. Against the backdrop of our own development programs in sleep disorders, acquiring Avadel aligns our development pipeline with an approved commercial assets and positions Alkermes to be a leader in the sleep medicine market. Avadel's established and proven commercial infrastructure and experience in rare diseases provides a strong foundation for the potential launch of alixorexton. As we integrate Avadel, we jump-start our capabilities and avoid the need to build a new disease-focused commercial infrastructure from the ground up. This not only allows for meaningful operating efficiencies. It also provides the opportunity to accelerate market uptake of alixorexton following the successful completion of the development program and FDA approval. By establishing an immediate commercial presence in the sleep medicine market, we have the opportunity to build critical relationships and deepen our understanding of the patient experience and commercial idiosyncrasies in the space. We expect the financial strength of the combined company will also support a diversified development strategy in sleep disorders. This includes, obviously, the upcoming Phase III program for alixorexton, but also potential label expansion for LUMRYZ, supported by the Phase III study in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia currently underway and the potential advancement of Valiloxybate, Avadel's in-licensed salt-free once-at-bedtime oxybate clinical development candidate. In addition, we'll continue to pursue a broad development strategy for our orexin 2 receptor agonist portfolio, including ALKS 4510 and ALKS 7290, both of which are now in Phase I and expected to enter human proof-of-concept studies next year. The acquisition reinforces our commitment to neuroscience, gives us additional scale and builds on our legacy of innovation in complex psychiatric and neurologic disorders. Now from a financial perspective, the transaction is expected to be immediately accretive upon closing. The LUMRYZ revenues represent an additional growth driver for our commercial portfolio. With expected 2025 net sales in the range of $265 million to $275 million upon closing, LUMRYZ will meaningfully augment our revenue growth profile, and it will further enhance our profitability and cash generation. So in summary, this transaction aligns with our strategic and therapeutic focus. It complements our commercial infrastructure and it adds new capabilities in rare disease. The timing of the acquisition is strategic and we believe it will position Alkermes to drive meaningful growth and deliver long-term value for our shareholders. So now I'd like to take a moment to introduce Joshua Reed, Alkermes' new Chief Financial Officer. Joshua brings a wealth of experience in strategic finance and operational leadership, and we're very happy to have him on board as we continue to execute on this growth strategy. With that, I'll turn the call over to Joshua to walk through the financial terms of the transaction.
Joshua Reed
executiveThank you, Richard. I'm excited to have joined Alkermes at such a pivotal and transformational moment for the company. Since coming on board, I spent time getting up to speed on the attributes of this proposed acquisition, and I believe it presents a compelling opportunity. Let me walk you through the key financial highlights. Pursuant to the agreement, Alkermes will acquire all outstanding ordinary shares of Avadel for $18.50 per share, payable in cash at closing. In addition, Alkermes will provide Avadel shareholders a nontransferable contingent value right entitling holders to a potential additional cash payment of $1.50 per share, contingent upon final FDA approval of LUMRYZ for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia in adults by the end of 2028. Taken together, this risk-adjusted structure offers a potential per share acquisition price of $20, which represents a premium of 38% to the weighted average trading price of Avadel over the 3 months prior to today's announcement or a premium of 12% to Avadel's closing price yesterday, and a total consideration of approximately $2.1 billion. The transaction has been approved by the Boards of Directors of both Alkermes and Avadel and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2026, subject to the conditions set out in this morning's Rule 2.7 announcement under Irish rules, including certain regulatory approvals and approval by Avadel's shareholders. As Richard outlined, upon closing, the transaction will both augment our revenue growth profile and be immediately accretive to our bottom line. Avadel is on a strong growth trajectory and recently transitioned to a net income and cash flow positive profile. Avadel's capabilities and infrastructure are largely complementary to ours, which is one of the attractive features of the deal. The financial synergies going forward will be largely derived from leveraging a profitable rare disease-focused commercial infrastructure to support the launch of alixorexton and thereby avoiding the costs associated with building those capabilities de novo. Of course, as noted in our Rule 2.7 announcement, we expect there may be certain opportunities for cost efficiencies from leveraging Alkermes' scale, system and processes across various functions. From a balance sheet perspective, we are entering this transaction from a position of strength. We will announce our full third quarter financial results next week, but are pleased to report that we ended the third quarter with $1.14 billion in cash and total investments and no debt, underscoring the financial strength and flexibility of the business. We expect to finance this acquisition in part with cash on hand, supplemented by the issuance of new debt of approximately $1.2 billion. This would represent a comfortable leverage ratio for us. We expect to delever in a reasonable time frame with cash generated by the business. This transaction represents a compelling opportunity to accelerate our growth trajectory and is squarely aligned with our financial and strategic priorities, strengthening our core business, expanding our portfolio and driving long-term value creation. With that, I will turn the call back to Sandy to manage the Q&A.
Sandra Coombs
executiveThank you, Joshua. Okay. Rob, we'll now open the call for Q&A, please.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question today is from the line of Leonid Timashev with RBC Capital Markets.
Leonid Timashev
analystMaybe only limited things you can say, but can you talk maybe about your confidence in the upcoming data for alixorexton, NT2 and IH and how anything you may be seeing there or feeling about could have impacted the timing of this transaction, your enthusiasm for this transaction, maybe the reasons for this transaction?
Richard F. Pops
executiveIt's Rich, I'll take the question. And the IH, NT2 program continues uninterrupted. We've been looking at this Avadel transaction for quite some time. And so as it matured, we moved aggressively. And I think it just underscores our overall confidence in alixorexton in all of its indications right now. Obviously, we have NT1 data in hand now, and we can assess its competitive profile in NT1, which we're quite excited about. We'll get NT2 data in probably in November and the IH next year. But this is all about building the foundation to be able to launch alixorexton as aggressively as possible.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Paul Matteis with Stifel.
Paul Matteis
analystCan you guys just like help us think about the midterm outlook for Avadel's once-nightly oxybate? How are you guys thinking about the moving parts in the market with increased Xyrem generics pricing pressure. And look, I know it's maybe not a totally fair question, but like how should we think about this asset as -- or this acquisition as like a multiple and what do you think a durable revenue number is going to ultimately look like, say, in the late 2020s as this market continues to change?
Richard F. Pops
executivePaul, it's Rich. Under Irish takeover, we really can't make forward-looking statements that are outside of what's inside the documentation around the 2.7 announcement, and there's a lot in there. But the general idea from our perspective is that this market is going to continue to grow as new medicines enter. And the -- our view is that the orexins can be transformational in this space, alixorexton in particular. But also within the oxybate market, you've got a very, very strong competitor with LUMRYZ. And the twice-a-day medicines, generic or otherwise are not substitutable with the once-nightly medication. And we've been watching the growth of the once-nightly category, as I'm sure you have, watching it grow and blossom and addressing unmet needs that patients have. So we think that's going to persist.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Joseph Thome with TD Cowen.
Joseph Thome
analystI guess a little bit to extend on that point. Do you see a specific type of patient that would be more applicable for an oxybate versus an orexin? And maybe second to that, can you talk about the potential competitive dynamics of LUMRYZ in IH given that Xywav once-nightly is a potential option for some patients on label? How can you, I guess, further differentiate against that?
Richard F. Pops
executiveJoe, it's interesting. As we get deeper into the development of alixorexton and we see that the huge benefits that accrue from driving wakefulness at the levels that we are in the NT1 patients so far. We also recognize that the disruptive nighttime sleep is a feature of the disease. And I think it's still an open scientific question about how much the orexin agonist at various doses are going to affect that disruptive nighttime sleep. And it seems to us that there's going to be a place for oxybate on a going-forward basis, no matter what. The orexins will affect that market, but I think there's always going to be an enduring oxybate market, particularly for the once-nightly version of it. So I think our view is that there's increasing optionality for patients with this disease, increasing physician focus on treating it, better and better tools, more and more diagnosis. And so the overall general trend in the marketplace is going to be for the use of better medicines for better outcomes for patients. In IH, we know -- as you mentioned, we've got an approved oxybate in IH already. Avadel study is underway. We'll look and see how those studies complete, and then we'll talk more about the competitive positioning in IH.
Operator
operatorOur next question is from the line of Umer Raffat with Evercore ISI.
Umer Raffat
analystA couple here, if I may, and not on future forecast, but I just wanted to understand philosophically how you expect genericization and gross to net expansion in this market to affect you guys going forward? And secondly, it looks like the once-nightly version of Avadel technology has taken meaningfully longer than I would have thought. There -- I think there's still some prototypes that were under development. So where exactly are we? And was that a core part of your diligence or not? And then finally, what's your confidence in the revenues -- historic revenue that I'm talking about because they look like they were fairly flat between 3Q and 1Q and there was a spike into 2Q. I guess I'm almost wondering is that when these conversations started?
Richard F. Pops
executiveYes, it's interesting. A lot of our diligence in the whole category as we got deeper and deeper into the alixorexton development program was trying to understand the role of oxybates and the future role of oxybates. And as I mentioned to Joe in the previous comment, I think that there's going to be an ongoing role for oxybates for certain patients. Remember, of the 80,000 patients are being treated right now for narcolepsy, only about 16,000 are getting oxybates right now. So it's -- there's a particular patient type that benefits and likes being on oxybate. And the once-nightly is a really nice option for these patients. In fact, much of the new patient starts for the once-nightly come from patients who've been on the twice-nightly version. So -- but on the generic gross to net expansion question, right now, and we don't expect it to change, the twice-nightlies are not substitutable for the once nightly. Actually, they had separate orphan status designation by FDA. It serves a different purpose. It has different medical and patient benefits. So we think that the once-nightly are going to continue to have their own niche in the marketplace. I didn't quite understand your second question about the once nightly. That is their product. The first priority [indiscernible] the low sodium. I see, yes. They recently licensed a low-sodium product. And that's not yet in the clinic. We'll be assessing that more carefully through our -- in our scientific diligence, we've done some work on it. We think it's interesting. And we'll be giving a lot more information as we get our hands on that development program. And also on just the basic hydraulics on the revenue side, as I mentioned in the call, the -- as of June 30, they have 3,100 patients on LUMRYZ out of 50,000 or so addressable market, the growth rate in new patient starts is what we've been focusing on over the last few quarters, and it's quite robust. So you're right, there was a little lull in the early part of the year, but that new patient start data has accelerated, and we're confident in their plan going forward.
Operator
operatorOur next question is from the line of David Amsellem with Piper Sandler.
David Amsellem
analystSo looking out longer term in a narcolepsy space and IH for that matter, where you have both orexin agonist and oxybate products, do you at all worry that the oxybate category could be a declining category in the context of multiple orexin agonist available. And as you think about not just the strategic fit, but sort of the long-term outlook for the market. What's your view regarding the trajectory of LUMRYZ once you have multiple orexins in the marketplace, both in narcolepsy and in IH?
Richard F. Pops
executiveDavid. So again, under the 2.7 the Irish rules, we won't make a lot of forward projections. But you should just know that as I've said before, I think that the oxybate, particularly once-nightly oxybate can enjoy a privileged position, an enduring position in the narcolepsy marketplace. For a couple of reasons. One is that -- what they do distinctively versus what the orexins are going to do. But number two, as I mentioned, I think to Umer is that right now, the prevalence in the U.S. is estimated to be something like 200,000 patients with narcolepsy, only about 100,000 of which are diagnosed and only about 80,000 of which are being treated. Why is that? It's because there haven't been really great medicines. And what you see in other therapeutic categories, as you get more and more innovative medicines in the category, providing different benefits to patients, overall diagnosis rates and treatment rates can increase as well. So right now, the oxybate market, its dollar volume is driven by a relatively small number of patients. And I think that there's an opportunity for the distinctive properties of a drug like LUMRYZ to continue to endure as the market itself gets more mature.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from the line of Jessica Fye with JPMorgan. The next question comes from the line of Marc Goodman with Leerink Partners.
Basma Radwan Ibrahim
analystThis is Basma on for Marc Goodman. Can you provide more color on what's your take for the value proposition of the low sodium versus high sodium oxybate? And also, we have a question, please, regarding the settlement. Is the fees only applies to LUMRYZ? What about -- we're just confirming, so it doesn't apply to the newly acquired assets from XWPharma? And if that's the case, what is the scenario here?
Richard F. Pops
executiveYes. On the low sodium, high sodium, I think that, first of all, in the embodiment of LUMRYZ, LUMRYZ's principal clinical attribute is its once-nightly dosing, which obviously has allowed it to carve out a growing presence in the marketplace. If that can be augmented by a low sodium version as well, I think that's all the better. And I think the logic of the license that they took earlier this year for a low-sodium formulation, which we will -- we will develop in the clinic as well. I can't really comment on the settlement at this point. That's -- we're not a party to that settlement. So I'll refer you to both [indiscernible] for the time being on the settlement details.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Akash Tewari with Jefferies.
Anastasia Parafestas
analystThis is Anastasia on for Akash. So just to kind of continue on the OX2 oxybate combo, would you consider using your, if further developed the low sodium once-nightly oxybate for that? And if you -- if you did not do that, would sodium be a concern for you? And maybe just if you consider offering any kind of price discount on any combo treatment given the patient burden?
Richard F. Pops
executiveYes. It's far too early to be talking about any pricing in this. But I would say this, in our conversations with experts at World Sleep and other sleep conferences, you do hear discussions about the interest in studying both a drug like alixorexton during the day and oxybate at some dose at nighttime. And I think we'll wait to see the full profile of the sleep architecture through our dosing in NT1, NT2 and IH before we really formalized those plans. But I think that there's an opportunity scientifically for investigation of the concomitant use of the two agents.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Jason Gerberry with Bank of America.
Jason Gerberry
analystJust one, Rich, just conceptually, when you think about the evolution of the market, I mean, by my rough math, it might be like 20,000 patients on oxybate to your point. It's restricted use makes it hard. But do you just generally see the pie being steady and really the growth coming from IH when the orexins start to really penetrate the market? Or do you see that kind of overall pie shrinking and then just LUMRYZ's share of that pie growing? And then I guess the other point is just what is the competitive advantage in your mind versus the other orexin players having an oxybate as well in the bag in terms of like enhancing your relevance with the various stakeholders in the space?
Richard F. Pops
executiveYes. It's great question, Jason, because in the conception like you said, I think that our view is that the overall number of patients being treated for narcolepsy with aggressive medicines being with more focused on improved outcomes is going to grow the pie. The overall treated population of patients with narcolepsy as alixorexton comes to market. It's just going to open up new treatment opportunities and new expectations from patients about what their lives can be like. And in so doing, I think there's -- that tide lifts a number of ships, including the once-nightly oxybate market. Again, for that subset of patients who are willing to go through what you need to go through to be on an oxybate and the doctors who are going to be part of that REMS program. But that's an established part of the market, and I think it will continue to grow. For us, I think having the 2 products, there's a couple of ways of thinking about the advantage of it. First is temporal. Probably the most important from our perspective is it puts us in the sleep market immediately upon closing. We will have a product that's doing north of $0.25 billion a year in sales, interacting with the key sleep centers, the key sleep physicians, the key sleep nurses, understanding the payment dynamics, the patient access journey, all that stuff is the prosaic working part of launching pharmaceutical company drugs in this world. And we know that intimately through VIVITROL and ARISTADA and LYBALVI, but in a new disease category, it's just going to allow us to burn in all those relationships years in advance of launching alixorexton. And that's super valuable. Once in the market, though, for a representative from Alkermes to be able to walk into a sleep center and say, "Look, we're not just promoting a single agent. What we're giving you is what outcomes or opportunities for patients to benefit at the physician's choice, what are most advantageous for patients in their practice." And I think that's a real differentiating feature. We experience that right now by having both ARISTADA and LYBALVI, a long-acting injectable of a certain active moiety and oral compound of another active moiety, that allows you to position not just selling your own product for your own benefit, but what's the best potential outcome for your patients, agnostic as to the modality that the physician is preferring. So long answer to a simple question, but it underscores why we're so excited about the here and now of adding a diversified revenue product growing into our mix, but also anticipating what it's going to mean for the launch of alixorexton.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Douglas Tsao with H.C. Wainwright.
Douglas Tsao
analystCongrats on the transaction. I guess, Richard, conceptually, when we think about the different buckets of patients between NT1, NT2 and IH, I'm just curious if you think there are any that are perhaps would benefit most from a combination of orexin and oxybate?
Richard F. Pops
executiveDoug, it's probably too early for me to make a stratification in that way. I can tell you that what we're learning through our ongoing study in NT1, NT2 and IH is that the patient population is very different. And there's diversity across those patient populations even within that differential diagnosis. So not all NT2 patients are created the same, not all IH patients are created the same. And I have a feeling, when you look at the data, many patients with narcolepsy type 1 or narcolepsy at large have tried an oxybate. And many of them have tried it and stayed with it. Many of them tried it and moved on, whether it was because of the need for twice-nightly dosing or because of the other limitations remains to be seen. So then the open question is if you can combine the two in a regimen that really provides significant outcomes for patients. Does that open up new opportunities for the use of once-nightly oxybate, that remains to be seen. But I think the core hypothesis is that the oxybates are here to stay. They provide different benefits than the orexins for certain patients and that the once-nightly form is a really attractive option for patients.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of David Hoang with Deutsche Bank.
David Hoang
analystSo I was just curious, as you did your due diligence on Avadel and LUMRYZ and the commercial strategy that Avadel has been implementing and you think about the LUMRYZ opportunity, do you see a bigger contributor from new to oxybate patient starts versus switch patients? And yes, any thoughts on that dynamic?
Richard F. Pops
executiveYes. Blair is here who's been focused on this as well, too, and I'll let him answer. But I think what was exciting to me is that a number of new patient starts are coming from the twice-nightly oxybates that are in the market. But Blair, go ahead.
Blair Jackson
executiveYes. No, it's a great question. And over the last few weeks to months, we spent a lot of time with the Avadel commercial team. And we were really incredibly impressed with their approach to marketing this product and just finding a way to make sure they can move patients onto the drug that they can make sure that the nurses and the doctors are able to engage with those patients and keep them on the drug. And so I think without getting into specifics on future forecasts, which we can't go into, what we can say is that both of those either switches or new starts are both major contributors to the growth of this product and a key area of focus. So it kind of gets to an earlier question we had as to how do we see about the robustness of the forecast moving forward? We feel really good about their approach, and we feel strong about the growth of this product moving forward. And as Rich said, for the potential of oxybate in the marketplace.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Benjamin Burnett with Wells Fargo.
Sandra Coombs
executiveAll right, Rob, why don't we move on and see if we can catch Ben at the end.
Operator
operatorOur next question will be from the line of Ami Fadia with Needham & Company.
Poorna Kannan
analystThis is Poorna on for Ami. Just curious to understand how IH has been valued in the deal, given that Xywav has already been approved and has been doing well?
Richard F. Pops
executiveAs you saw in the structure of the deal, we've added a continued value right based on the ability to enter the market with LUMRYZ in IH. And that notionally is valued another $1.50 per share. And so we see incremental value for sure in the IH indication, and we'll be moving aggressively to hope to expand the label for LUMRYZ into that indication. Also, we believe that we'll be in that market with alixorexton as well. So once again, just opening a new area of the market for both products.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from the line of Uy Ear with Mizuho.
Uy Ear
analystCongrats on the deal. So you guys spoke about being immediately accretive. Just wondering if you can sort of help us understand if there is any potential synergies from the deal? And secondly, when did you guys, if you can disclose, started speaking to Avadel seriously about this potential takeout?
Richard F. Pops
executiveSo why don't -- I'll start and then Joshua can chime in. We say it's immediately accretive because even just on a pro forma combined basis. They've just recently become cash flow positive and profitable as are we, and we're not using any stock in this transaction. This is a cash transaction. So we expect the primary synergies come from, as I mentioned before, avoiding the need to build entirely new commercial sleeve to launch into the rare disease space. So we'll leverage a profitable enterprise to do so. So in our models, that's extremely valuable to us going forward. On a synergies basis, we expect some modest synergies as we combine the 2 overlapping organizations, but they're largely complementary to us. But Joshua, I don't know if you want to add anything to that?
Joshua Reed
executiveNo, that's right, Richard. Of course, as we combine the businesses, there'll be opportunities for efficiencies and cost reduction, certainly by leveraging our scale system and processes across various functions. But as Richard pointed out, Avadel turned cash flow positive. And so even without these synergies, the deal will be accretive to us.
Richard F. Pops
executiveAnd I won't speak to the history of the deal other than what's in the press release and the 2.7. There will be a proxy filed and you have all the details. But we've been watching Avadel's launch of LUMRYZ since 2023. And two things really wanted -- we wanted to watch mature. A, was seeing the trajectory of their business. And the second was our confidence in alixorexton. Two years ago, we weren't sure whether we would be in this market. Now we have a lot of conviction that we're going to be in -- with a really exciting medicine. So I think it all matured at the same time.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from the line of Ben Burnett with Wells Fargo.
Benjamin Burnett
analystI just want to ask, how do you view Avadel's sales force? And I guess, do you think that, that sales force is sufficient to commercialize also alixorexton? Or would you, I guess, anticipate needing to build that out further?
Richard F. Pops
executiveWell, we think the sales force is excellent. We think their commercial team is excellent, and it's appropriately sized for the business that they have now. But as it continues to grow, we'll pay attention to that. Particularly as these categories mature and the space between the prevalent population and the treated population narrows, often the sales forces will grow to meet that expanding market. Right now, the sleep specialist market is pretty tight. You don't need a large commercial team to address the principal writers in the space. But over the next couple of years, we'll be watching that. And I can guarantee when we launch alixorexton, we'll do so with an appropriately sized sales force. But this is just a fantastic way to get ourselves into that market to understand those dynamics intimately.
Operator
operatorAt this time, we've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'll hand the floor back to Sandy Coombs for closing remarks.
Sandra Coombs
executiveAll right. Thanks, everyone, for joining us on the call this morning on short notice. Please feel free to reach out to the company if you have any additional questions that we can be helpful with. Thank you.
Operator
operatorThank you. This will conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. Have a wonderful day.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.