Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 16, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Health Care Life Sciences Tools and Services conference_presentation 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Tejas Savant

analyst
#1

Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today on day 3 of our Healthcare Conference. I'm Tejas Savant, and I cover the life science tools and diagnostics sector here at Morgan Stanley. I'm delighted to have Avantor join us this morning. And representing the company are Michael Stubblefield, CEO; and Tom Szlosek, CFO. So welcome, gents. And before we get started, Michael, I have a quick disclaimer I need to run through. Please note that the webcast is for Morgan Stanley's clients and appropriate Morgan Stanley employees only. The webcast is not for members of the press. And if you are with the press, please disconnect and reach out separately. For important disclosures, please see morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. And if you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales rep.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#2

So with that, Michael, perhaps to set the stage this morning, can you just go over a history of the company, pre and post VWR? And from your perspective, how exactly has that value proposition evolved over the last 5 years or so?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#3

Yes. Thanks for having us. Happy to be with you this morning. And I think that's a great place to start. With the Avantor that we have in place today, we've really brought together 2 companies in what we refer to as the legacy of Avantor and VWR, both with extremely rich legacies that each go back well more than 100 years. And in bringing these 2 businesses together, we've been able to combine a leading manufacturer in Avantor of ultra high-purity ingredients and materials with the leading customer channel to create a trusted global partner to customers in both the life sciences as well as the advanced technology industries. And our model enables us to credibly access more than 250,000 labs around the world. And with this access, we're able to position more than 6 million products and services to support our customers' research and the early phase discovery activities. And importantly, this access enables us to position our customized solutions that ultimately get specified into our customers' next-generation technology platforms, whether that be a life-saving therapy or a medical device. Being able to serve our customers' workflows on an integrated basis, from early phase discovery all the way through to delivery, creates tremendous value to our customers as they benefit from increased quality and efficiency and productivity. And we think that the new Avantor is uniquely positioned to serve the growing needs of laboratory and production customers around the world.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#4

And then, Michael, now with the pandemic, has the role you play connecting this -- these thousands of suppliers to a highly fragmented customer base become even more critical? And if so, has that presented opportunities for you to gain sort of mind and market share with your customer base?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#5

Yes. With our model, it all starts with the channel where we have tremendous scale and unparalleled customer access. That's as good as anyone out there. And the depth and the breadth that we bring that it's really critical for our customers. And our suppliers appreciate our ability to reach our customers on a global scale via our -- the reach that we get through our channel. And ultimately, our supply chain and our forward stocking centers provide customers with real-time rapid order fulfillment, which in today's environment creates a tremendous amount of value. And it's proven especially important, as you referenced, in the pandemic as we positioned our comprehensive workflow-based solutions for testing for PPE and certainly for vaccine development. And the strength of our channel has definitely enabled us to pick up some important new account wins, especially in the health care space, as our product breadth and supply chain security strengthen all of our customers' business continuity plans, which is so critical in a time like this.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#6

Got it. And you spoke about 500 to 600 bps tailwind actually on the second quarter. That helped offset some of the headwinds you saw elsewhere in the portfolio. Can you just help us parse out these tailwinds a little bit? Which of these do you see as durable and which of these do you expect to wind down perhaps as testing or PPE demand like declines?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#7

The tailwinds that we saw in the second quarter fell into 3 categories. Firstly, diagnostic testing, PPE and then our bioproduction business. Testing and PPE collectively represented about 3/4 of the tailwind that we saw in the quarter. Obviously, we're not exactly sure what those environments will look like in a post-vaccine period, but we'd certainly expect the favorable impact that we saw in the second quarter to continue in the short to medium term. The balance of the tailwind was driven by our bioproduction platform, where, as we talked a little bit about in the second quarter and certainly I've seen it continue into the third quarter, we have an unprecedented order book. And although we haven't seen the full impact yet of the vaccine, obviously, there's nothing approved yet. But we are participating broadly across -- all 4 of the major modalities are being explored. And our model will definitely scale quickly as vaccine candidates receive emergency use authorization. And certainly, we're looking forward to enabling those solutions.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#8

Got it. And so just to put a finer point on that. I mean relative to the 500 or 600 bps you saw, do you expect the sort of total tailwind to be sort of at a similar level in the third and fourth quarter? Or do you think it could potentially be even higher as some of these vaccine candidates move into commercialization, perhaps late in or early next?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#9

Yes. I mean in the -- we obviously haven't closed the books on the quarter yet, and then all the fine analytics that would get us to a specific number for tailwinds in the quarter. But in our second quarter call, we talked a little bit about July coming in kind of flat to low single-digit growth. Obviously, we now have the benefit of hindsight and can say that July came in at the high end of that range, and we've certainly seen that carry through the middle here of September. And that's going to be a combination of certainly some impact from the tailwinds. We haven't quantified the impact yet. But certainly, an improvement sequentially in our base business. There are elements of the business that we're certainly seeing headwinds in the second quarter, most notably in the academic and in the health care space. And we've seen meaningful improvements in both of those end markets as we've moved from the second quarter and into the third quarter here. And so through the combination of continued tailwinds and improvement in the base business, we're happy to see the business return to growth.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#10

Got it. That's good to hear. And just in terms of some of those -- the weak spots in the portfolio at the moment. In terms of the month-over-month trajectories, is there anything that leaves you sort of like incrementally more concerned than you were at the time of your second quarter earnings call? Has everything gotten better? It just sort of improving a different sort of cadences.

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#11

I think in that call, we highlighted probably 3 major areas of impact. One was in the academic setting, where we saw the market bottom out, probably being off more than 50% or in around 50% to the month of April with incremental improvements through the quarter. And we have continued to see steady improvements in that end market as we've got into early days of September here. The health care space, which we play in somewhat of a unique way, about -- it's about 10% of our revenue, roughly half of that is a pretty novel exposure we have through our medical-grade silicone platform, and the other half is in more traditional health care. And the pullback in kind of "elective" procedures impacted both the medical implant side of our business as well as just in the traditional point of care, hospital clinic as I think unless you had COVID or thought you had COVID, but you probably weren't going to facilities. So we definitely saw significant headwinds in that part of the business. For both pieces of that, we've seen nice recovery here into the third quarter. I'm not sure the implant business is back to 100% yet. But on the other side of that business, on the health care piece, I think for the most part, we've seen improvement through the quarter and plus or minus, I would say, in a normalized demand environment there. And going back to my earlier questions about have we been able to increase share during this time? I think this is a good area where the strength of our supply chain has really enabled us to pick up some important account wins, and we're going to show some nice growth on the health care side of our business in the third quarter. The last area that we highlighted in the second quarter is being off a bit was some of our applied markets. It's about 1/4 of our revenue, and that's split kind of down the middle, about half of that is going to be somewhat cyclical in nature. The other half is going to be pretty insulated and pretty robust. And the piece that was more industrial in nature, obviously took a hit in the second quarter. That's going to follow the macro trends and the broad global macro fundamentals for the most part. So it's still off in the third quarter. But it's -- we have seen some sequential improvement. And I think if you look at the global PMI, for example, I think it's now over 50. So we're seeing improvements there. And you put all that together, and I think it paints a picture that the base business is now growing. I think we still got some room for incremental recovery moving into the fourth quarter, but a much better picture here in the third quarter than the second quarter.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#12

Got it. Got it. And then obviously, is it fair to characterize biopharma just further along in the recovery relative to your academic lab customers? I mean that's the read we get from your peers, from our channel checks, but what are you seeing there? And is there anything that worries you in terms of perhaps a little bit of skepticism around CapEx spending?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#13

Yes. So I would take a couple of things. One, the biopharma business for us, which is obviously a really important end market for us. It's about half of our revenue. And we would split that exposure, kind of -- 2/3 of that is going to be in the R&D space and the other 1/3 is going to be in the production space. The production piece of that has been a real strength for us throughout the year, and we've seen that accelerate in the second quarter and into the third quarter. On the R&D piece, there was definitely a bit of a pullback in the second quarter, but nowhere near the level that we saw the pullback in the academic space. And I think there's a lot of publicly available data that talked about the number of academic labs versus biopharma R&D labs that were offline. And there was a pretty big difference. And definitely, kind of as we have seen in the academic piece, more and more of the biopharma researchers have returned to the bench. And I think we see a nice sequential improvement here into the third quarter. That is an additional driver for our base business returning to growth. And I think we continue to be quite bullish about biopharma. We're bullish about it before COVID, and I think the pandemic has only heightened the focus on the importance of this biologic workflow. And it's also highlighted, I think, our relevance. The core biologics business, for the most part, is driven by monoclonal antibody modality. That the vaccine opportunity here, I think, has highlighted our relevance across all major biologic modalities and the transferability of our technologies across each of these areas. So I think there's pretty full pipeline of opportunities, both COVID related as well as non-COVID related that we think created a pretty robust backdrop for this business going forward.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#14

Got it.

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#15

You mentioned about the CapEx environment and what impact would we get or see potentially from -- on our business from capital budgets going into the balance of this year. It's a great question because I think it highlights maybe some of the uniqueness of our business model, which we like a lot here. We've been able to talk a lot through this pandemic about the resiliency of our business model. It's a highly recurring revenue business model. More than 85% of our business is going to be recurring. So this topic of CapEx, while it can maybe impact your business, positive or negatively. On the fringe, it's less than 15% of our revenue. So that trend isn't one that's particularly important to the outlook for our business.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#16

Got it. Got it. And then Michael, going back to your comments on biologics and some of the cell and gene therapy manufacturing upside that you guys participate in. Can you walk us through, a, I mean, how exactly have you positioned the company to participate in that? What are the next steps for you in terms of making sure you kind of like punch above your weight in capturing that upside as some of those customers ramp into commercial scale manufacturing, particularly within cell and gene therapy? And then what have bioprocessing order trends look like for you?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#17

Yes. Those are all important drivers of our business. And just to reiterate, we remain very bullish on the outlook for the biologics space. Funding has been favorable, and there's a robust pipeline of new therapies that are being developed. And I think it's important to recognize that our broad solution, coupled with our deep customer access would have a specified into more than 80% of the commercialized biologics that are on the market today. And by extension, we're very well represented in the pipeline. I highlighted that not only are we relevant in the core monoclonal antibody workflows, but -- as well as the other major modalities. And we drive our presence in our growth. It's all underpinned by our investments in innovation to bring new products and solutions to the market, most notably or most recently, the launch of our Protein A product, I think, is a great example of that. We've also been aggressively scaling our infrastructure, significant investments over the last several years and even through the pandemic here to ensure that we have the right manufacturing capacity in place to keep pace with the growth opportunity that we do have. Specific to cell and gene therapy, we recently doubled the size of our flagship development center in New Jersey, specifically to position us to capture opportunities in the cell and gene therapy area. Particularly in the gene therapy area, our relevance in that space, I think, has really been highlighted in the work we're doing on the COVID vaccine, particularly the viral vector candidates. And I think it's an indication of the opportunity that we do see in this emerging gene therapy area. Interesting enough, these gene therapies have been extensively worked on and studied for years in the lab environment, and we've been an important partner in that space. The real challenge that I think is as an industry that we face is how do you scale these technologies from the lab to full-scale commercialization. And we, with our solutions, whether it be our single-use solutions or our ultra high-purity GMP ingredients, we play a really important role in partnering with our customers to work out the issues associated with that scale up. And so there's a few therapies that are obviously approved and on the market that we would be certainly a part of, and we see great opportunity going forward here. And I think if you take a step back, certainly, the pipeline has a lot of monoclonal antibodies in it that has fueled the growth over the last decade. We think that there's a robust pipeline of those modalities that will continue to fuel the growth. What's exciting for me, though, given that this is kind of the cornerstone of our business model, with something like cell and gene therapy, already starting to take shape, you can kind of see the makings of the next wave of growth here. That should spur the industry well into the future here. And then the last point I would make is, beyond our investments in technology, beyond our investments in infrastructure to make the capacity available, the next lever of the playbook here really now starting to come into focus through M&A. And as we have improved the health of our balance sheet. We're now on the cusp of kind of our target leverage range, which will allow us then to use M&A in a meaningful way to also supplement the capabilities that we have broadly in this biologics space to make us even a more valuable partner to our customers.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#18

Got it. And any sort of comment on order trends as you look at the back half of the year and then to '21?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#19

Pretty robust. I guess it'd probably be a bit of an understatement. I've been running this business for the last 6 years, and I've never seen an order book like what we have today. And I'd say there's 2 dynamics that I'd like to call out here. One, we have our base book of business that were specified into approved therapies and of course, everybody is focused on these vaccines, but it's important that we all keep in mind that there are many other life-critical therapies that are important that we continue to focus on. And I think many of those customers with an eye towards just managing risk and knowing that there's going to be a bit of a constraint in this, broadly speaking, the supply chain have been far more proactive in placing orders for their production plans. And I would say the length of our order book is probably longer than I've seen historically. And so that's kind of one dynamic we've seen. The second dynamic, obviously, then is we've been supporting most, if not all, of the front-running and second-running candidates that are working vaccines through the pipeline, but you're talking relatively modest volumes. I mean any of the candidates that are in Phase III, they're talking about 30,000 volunteers, maybe giving 2 doses each. You're talking about 60,000 doses or so per trial maybe that you're supporting. Obviously, there's a massive inflection point if any of these candidates ultimately get approved that would drive significant change in demand as you start to work into the hundreds of millions of doses. And so we do see from some of the leading candidates now, orders coming through, which just given the magnitude are clearly linked to their expectation that sometime later this fall that they would be starting to ramp production. And so between those 2 impacts on our order book, it's as robust as I've seen.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#20

Got it. Got it. I want to go back to a point you made earlier about how your applied market exposure is more resilient than a lot of people sort of seem to assume. Can you walk us through how outside of that oil and gas and petrochemical exposure on the semiconductor and defense side, what drives that resiliency? And some of the ultra-high purity chemicals that you make, what drives the moat around that business relative to perhaps some of the competition?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#21

So the applied markets represent about 25% of Avantor's revenue. And as you've indicated, about half of that revenue is going to be in some really defensive growth-oriented end markets, where we play in a unique way. And interesting enough, I think the model for serving life science, at least the way we play it, is pretty well understood and that we would work with scientists in early phase discovery, customized solution, earn that specification and then support that platform through its life cycle. In end markets like aerospace and defense, end markets like the semiconductor space, the business model works the exact same way actually. With one interesting twist, the performance requirements are in order of magnitude, more sophisticated. And so we are engaging with our partners, again, in very early phase development. In the case of aerospace and defense, that can obviously be a really long and extended development cycle. We're in the process of commercializing programs we've been working on for more than a decade. But once you earn that specification, it's a customized solution. And in the very same way as we would with a approved medical implant or pharmaceutical therapy, we would service that production platform over the life cycle. And so in that way, it becomes highly recurring. And given that it's the nature of the solutions that we provide and coupled with the nature of our technologies, we have seen, even through this pandemic, continued steady growth in that part of our business. The other half of our applied exposure is in things like pet-chem and oil and gas, as you mentioned. And we're going to be supporting those end markets, analytical workflows, so their QA/QC work associated with production. And so it is definitely going to follow the output of those end markets. But the first half of that platform I described works exactly like the rest of our life science portfolio and adds to the resiliency and the robustness and the recurring nature of our revenue.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#22

Got it. Just a couple of questions for you on your APAC strategy on the services side -- and on the services side of things because I feel like those 2 aspects of the story don't get as much attention. Obviously, APAC for you was one of the reasons you decided to do the VWR transaction so that they could leverage legacy Avantor's presence there and sort of scale up. Are you sort of satisfied with the cadence of how that scale up has gone? Or is there more work to do there? Or have you perhaps discovered certain market dynamics that you hadn't anticipated before?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#23

Yes. I mean if you step back and you look at our growth algorithm, we talk about our business growing mid-single digits, and I think we're pretty comfortable that 5-plus percent growth is the right way to think about this business. And there are many different levers for driving that kind of growth, including, as you referenced, we think we've got an outsized opportunity here in the Asia-Pacific region and would anticipate that part of our business, although it's only 5% of our revenue, continuing to grow double digits, which will obviously help us overall here. What's interesting to note is, and you referenced it, the legacy of Avantor business was very well positioned in Asia Pacific, about 1/4 of our revenue comes from that region for that part of the business. We were very well positioned in the biologics space, as you would expect, in places like Singapore and Korea. And as part of our strategy now, with the opportunity that we do see in China that's emerging, particularly in the area of cell therapy. We're investing to capture that opportunity. We opened up a new application center there at the end of 2019. And we're spending a lot of time there building technical and application capabilities and working with our customers to start to seed their pipeline opportunities with our technologies. And so I think we're optimistic that we can continue to leverage our strength in biopharma and health care to realize the potential that we see in that part of the world. And it will be an important growth driver to the overall algorithm that we talked about here.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#24

Got it. And then on the services side of things, I mean, are there any sort of scale-ups to come on that front as you look to drive the growth there?

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#25

Yes, similar to what you said about Asia Pacific, services is another one of those important drivers of our mid-single-digit growth algorithm. It's about 12% to 15% of our revenue, growing double digits. And there are some really interesting offerings in there that fuel that growth. Through acquisition, we have built a really compelling clinical trial services offering that we've especially been able to leverage in this pandemic, custom kitting to support clinical trials. We have one of the leading biorepository offerings, and we have a really novel equipment and instrument platform to support those trials. And we've been investing in this business steadily. A little over a year ago, we opened up the largest facility here in the U.S., for biorepository. We just finished construction of a brand-new biorepository facility for Europe. It's just outside the Frankfurt airport there. And we're in the process of all the qualifications and approvals from our customers and such to be able to open the doors there. So we'll continue to grow this part of our business, this trend of outsourcing. And as customers challenge, what's core, what's not core, being able to enhance the product offering through the services side of our business just deepens the relationship that we have with our customers and gives us a really privileged seat at the table there to understand our customers' pain points and help bring meaningful solutions to them, drive efficiency and productivity for our customers, and it's a really important element of how we wrap our arms around our customers.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#26

Got it. And I want to pull it, Tom, here for a quick question on margins. I mean obviously, Tom, in the second quarter, the mix shift towards consumables helped you on the margin line. It sounds like, I mean, the strength on the consumables side should sequentially be stronger as things -- as labs reopen and so on. On the equipment and instruments side, obviously, there is possibly going to be a slower sort of like recovery. So how should we think about margin progression in the near term? And then I have a quick follow-up as well.

Thomas Szlosek

executive
#27

Yes. Good question, Tejas. I mean as you know, the history of the company since the combination in 2017 has been really strong on margin expansion. The businesses have a great acumen when it comes to commercial savviness and acumen, and do an excellent job of managing the pricing relative to the inflationary factors that we experienced. Also a excellent job on -- for the last couple of years on the integration of the 2 businesses. We've achieved probably 9 months early, the targeted synergies, and there will still be some more, but well over $300 million of synergies. The mix is also a long-term driver for us. When you look at the growth on the proprietary side of our portfolio relative to the growth on the third-party side. It's not that we're deemphasizing third-party or trying to replace a third-party product. But what we are doing is investing in platforms that give us new opportunities. And as well as proprietary growth outstrips the third party that enhances margins as well. So all of those are longer-term plays that have -- that we've demonstrated strong performance on relative to what's immediately in front of us. I mean it's a pretty unique situation. I mean we've got controls on cost, as an example, on T&E and so forth that are helping the margins. And also you have even more favorable mix dynamics on top of that accelerate proprietary growth. And what I mean there is some of the things Michael talked about earlier, where you have good growth in -- outsized growth in biopharma production. You have outsized growth on some of the diagnostics. You have outsized growth in some of the PP&E categories. And you have lower growth, as you mentioned, on some of the lower margin categories, like equipment and instrumentation, where it's largely a third-party offering for us. So I think in the short term, you should expect even more favorable margin impacts from those mix dynamics as well as those cost control dynamics. At some point, those reverse. At some point, post vaccine. We -- our people are out seeing customers, and we are traveling. Customers are investing in CapEx, and that will have its impact. But right now, that's a bit of an uncertainty, and we're definitely enjoying the enhanced mix on top of what we normally do. So longer term, I mean, as we grow, as Michael said, mid-single digits, call it, 5% plus. We should -- our model should continue to drive 50 to 100 basis points margin expansion a year...

Tejas Savant

analyst
#28

I got it. Just one quick one to wrap up here. On the capital deployment front, Michael mentioned this before as well. You're on the cusp of dipping below 4x at this stage. It sounds like the focus has shifted a little bit towards sort of more meaningful M&A in a sense rather than trying to push the leverage down to, like, say, 2.5 or 3x. Is that a fair way to characterize sort of your capital deployment priorities on a go-forward basis? Or will you continue to delever and sort of be opportunistic essentially with tuck-ins and adjacencies?

Thomas Szlosek

executive
#29

Yes. I mean to say it's -- simply, I'd say, the latter of the 2 that you mentioned. I mean the delevering is really important to us and is the #1 capital deployment priority. Our cash performance has been really strong. We expect it to continue to be strong in the second half. I mean particularly in the first and third quarters, where we don't have a sizable interest payment, those are in the second and fourth quarter, we have just exceptional cash performance, and you should expect to continue to see that. That will enable that delevering that you referred to. But that's not to say that we're not interested in M&A. In fact, we've restarted our program. We have a leader on board. Started in December. He's working with all the business units to develop total pipelines. We are visiting and working with potential candidates. I would say, in the near term, and define that maybe 12 months, to the extent there's M&A, I think it would be able to tuck-in variety, call it $50 million to $100 million of incremental revenue. When we're comfortably into that leverage range, we would be willing to consider more transformational type of things, more sizable type of things. And those are also in our funnel. I mean as you know, there's a long lead time on all of that. So they are on our screen today, even though actionability. And our timing will be the difference. So -- but overall, it's -- the M&A is a fundamental part of this business model and how this leadership team was constructed. And what we've been doing for the last 2 or 3 years is integrating a sizable, sizable acquisition. So we're ready for more.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#30

Got it. And then the refinancing is still on the cards for that second slug there on the balance sheet?

Thomas Szlosek

executive
#31

Yes. So you're referring to our $5 billion of debt that we have outstanding. We refinanced $2 billion of that $5 billion over the summer. We got the rate from 9% down to roughly 4.5%. So that's going to generate sizable savings, almost $90 million of interest and cash savings. The other $3 billion of the portfolio, there are high-cost elements of that as well. Half of that has got an interest rate of 6%, unsecured. The markets for that type of debt are not as robust as the unsecured. And in fact, there -- we could consider doing a little bit more unsecured as we move more towards an investment-grade balance sheet. So we're closely watching the markets. We do think there's opportunity to reduce that 6%. And there's some other debt that we think we can reduce the cost of as well. It's not -- it wouldn't be of the magnitude of $90 million, but you could see another $30 million or so of savings. There are other factors we need to balance into this as well. The savings are critical, but we also want to have debt that's prepayable and doesn't have significant prepayment penalties. We also want to have the laddering of our maturities that is comfortable for us as we move forward. We love the fact that we have very light debt covenants, and we would seek to maintain that. And then the mix between unsecured and secured. We'd like to continue to move towards an investment-grade balance sheet that has more unsecured. So it's a number of other factors in addition to the pure interest savings that we're trying to balance here. Hopefully, in the short term here, in the next 3 to 6 months, we'd be able to do something with a good portion of the remaining debt.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#32

Got it. That was fantastic, gents. So thank you so much for your time this morning. I really appreciate it.

Michael Stubblefield

executive
#33

Great. Thank you.

Tejas Savant

analyst
#34

This concludes the webcast for everyone online. Thank you. Thanks, again.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Avantor, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Avantor, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.