Banca Sistema S.p.A. (BST) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 7, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood afternoon. This is the Chorus Call conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the Banca Sistema Full Year 2019 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Gianluca Garbi, CEO of Banca Sistema. Please go ahead, sir.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveThank you, and good afternoon to everybody. I'm here with the CFO, Ilaria; and our Investor Relator, Carlo Di Pierro. As you can see from the presentation and also the statement that has been issued, we have registered good asset growth last year. We have registered quarter with the growth in profitability and also further balance sheet strengthening. I'm also happy to announce the acquisition of the jewelry-backed loans unit of Intesa Sanpaolo that is subject to the authorization of Bank of Italy, that will also increase the weight of this business in terms of profitability of the group. A business. This last one, that the double-digit in terms of total income margin and very low capital absorption and 0 NPL. Going to the Slide #2, that gives you the snapshot of the results for last year. As you can read from here, the factoring turnover has increased 27% on a year-on-year basis, which is equal to EUR 3.1 billion. The CQ business outstanding has reached EUR 817 million, with an increase of 25% on a year-on-year basis. The gold/jewelry-backed loans outstanding in the EUR 12 million, with more than 9,000 underlying individual contract and pro forma in -- if we will include the Intesa Sanpaolo business this year, it will reach EUR 70 million. The interest income is equal to EUR 80.7 million, with an increase of 8%. Slightly lower funding costs on a year-on-year basis, that has been reduced from 0.9% to 0.8%. The total income equal to EUR 100.9 million with an increase of 11% on a year-on-year basis, driven by higher core business growth. The cost of risk is equal to 36 basis points, with the EUR 9.1 million of loan loss provisions. The total operating cost is up on a year-on-year basis, following the cost coming from Atlantide acquisition. The net income has increased at 9% and is equal to EUR 29.7 million. The return on average equity is at 18%, which is among the highest in the European Financial Services industry. Total assets are up 19% at EUR 3.7 billion. The term deposit has a strong growth since the third quarter of 2018, in particular, from the foreign component. And wholesale funding represents 39% of total funding. The TLTRO III is equal to EUR 108 million with an increase of EUR 98 million on a quarter-on-quarter basis. Just as a reminder, the allowance that we will have confirmed the ECB is for EUR 295 million that you can use in the next period. The core Tier 1 ratio, as you can see, we report the pro forma as well as the -- in the footnote we report also the non pro forma, the regulatory one. So pro forma, including with the reduction that we've seen from the 28th of June 2021 on the CQ business of the core Tier 1 is 13.9% and total capital ratio is at 17.8%, with both higher on a year-on-year basis as well on the quarter-on-quarter basis. The proposed dividend per share that the Board will submit to the general assembly is at EUR 0.093 per share, and it was EUR 0.087 last year. So with a dividend yield, if we look at the closing of the stock yesterday at 5.1% and with an increase of dividend in absolute term of 7%. Moving up the next slide to give you a bit more details, very quickly. The -- as you can see, the factoring, the CQ as well as the gold and jewelry-backed loans have registered a strong increase on a year-on-year basis. As of the end of the year, the tax receivable business represent on the factoring component, 27% of the total outstanding, and we expect further growth also in the course of this year. I have already mentioned the performance of the CQ. And following the merger of Atlantide, we will expect in 2020 a good growth also in the direct origination of the CQ product. Now let me give you the floor for the comment of the next slide to Ilaria that will give you more analysis of our numbers.
Ilaria Bennati
executiveGood afternoon to everybody. As usual, I'll focus my comments on the main earnings figures and KPIs. I'll cover briefly at Slide 4, where we make some comments on the balance sheet. As shown in the table, total assets now stand at EUR 3.7 billion, only marginally higher quarter-on-quarter, but up 19% versus 2018 year-end. In particular, Govies' portfolio is now EUR 985 million and is up year-on-year, with an average duration of 17.6 months. Loans at amortized cost at almost EUR 2.7 billion, a rapid good 14% year-on-year, while just slightly up quarter-on-quarter. And in particular, we have the factoring receivables, are up 9% year-on-year and reached EUR 1.7 billion. They are slightly lower quarter-on-quarter, and this is due to some anticipated collections. CQ loans are up 25% year-on-year and reached EUR 817 million. Gold and jewelry-backed loans, as Gianluca mentioned, stand at EUR 12 million, and they'll be higher in 2020 following the just mentioned acquisition of the Intesa Sanpaolo business, which should bring as an additional EUR 60 million of loans. On the liability side, due to bank's quarter-on-quarter increase is mainly driven by higher ECB funding, which is now EUR 385 million. We will cover the ECB funding in more details when we discuss funding in general. Due to customers, increase year-on-year is mainly driven by the increase in term deposits, which are indeed down quarter-on-quarter following the reduction in the rates of the broad. Debt securities are up quarter-on-quarter, thanks to the financing of the new securitization, the CQ Quinto Sistema '19 that was launched in September and which has now reached the size of EUR 165 million. We now move on to discuss the P&L dynamics in the next slide. The -- for the full P&L table, as you know, you can refer to the appendix. If you look at the table, the first table, interest income is up 11% year-on-year, where the growth is driven by higher income contribution from the 2 main business lines, factoring in CQ. There has also been a solid contribution from the Govies portfolio. If we look at the top left table, we see that total interest income is EUR 110 million and with EUR 81 million factoring represents 74% of it. The year-on-year increase of the factoring income was driven over the quarter by different components. In the second quarter, for example, the one component that has registered the strongest increase year-on-year was extra collections. In the first quarter, there has been a strong contribution from the accrual and in the last quarter, the best performer were physical receivables. In the physical space, in particular, not only we have purchased a lot of credit in the last quarter, but also we benefit from significant collections on outstanding position. As usual, we focus our attention on LPI. LPI for legal action was just slightly higher year-on-year. Indeed, it's now equal to EUR 29 million compared to the EUR 28.4 million in 2018. Of the EUR 29 million, EUR 5.1 million is related to the update of the accrual rates and time value that we applied in the third quarter, and EUR 11.9 million is related to extra collection. In terms of cash collection, the 2019 has been the strongest year ever, with EUR 21.5 million of overall collection. As a result of the dynamic I just described, adjusted income margin is higher quarter-on-quarter, driven mainly by factoring margin. As shown in the top right table, the margin, the consolidated margin now set at 5.2%, and it's been on a positive trajectory since the first quarter. This quarter's margin's improvement has been mainly influenced by the performance of physical receivables. We still experienced a reduction versus last year, mainly explained by factoring margin's compression and the higher weight of CQ on total customer loans as already described in previous calls. Finally, the stock of LPIs, bottom left table, stands at EUR 142 million, of which EUR 107 million is part of the accrual perimeter. This is after quarter-on-quarter following start of new legal actions in the quarter that has not compensated the sale of LPI. The amount of LPI that are recorded in the balance sheet is now EUR 49.9 million, so almost EUR 50 million. We now move on to the next slide to comment total income. We closed the financial year with a total income of EUR 100.9 million, which is up 11% year-on-year. The growth is driven mainly by higher net interest income and higher net commissions. The interest income increase was described as more than compensated higher interest expenses. And indeed, the interest expense increase is only driven by higher stock of funding, while the cost of funding remains at 0.8%, which is lower, slightly lower year-on-year. Net commissions increase is due to the higher commission income, driven by factoring turnover, while higher commission expenses are due to the strong growth of the foreign funding raised through the online platforms. Trading and dividends component this year includes the EUR 1.1 million gain from the sale of factoring positions versus private companies that we executed in the fourth quarter. We have had a strong contribution of the Govies portfolio as well with a total EUR 6.3 million contribution to the income, of which EUR 3.5 million is included in the net interest income. We now move on to costs on Page 7. Operating costs have increased year-on-year by 20%, and most of increase is due to the dynamics that occurred in Q2. Personnel expenses account now for 46% of total costs and a higher year-on-year, also due to the addition of the 21 headcount from Atlantide. Today, our total headcount base has reached 215 units. Other costs are also higher year-on-year for a few reasons. We have registered the one-off integration costs related to the Atlantide emerging -- merger that has been quantified in EUR 600,000. We have also had slightly higher admin expenses due, amongst other reasons, to the contribution to the National Resolution fund and the deposit guarantee scheme, which together account for EUR 1 million increase compared to last year. Also, the consolidation of the Atlantide cost base accounts for EUR 1.9 million additional cost over a 9-month period. Finally, as we mentioned also in previous calls, we have had higher net provision for risk and charge related to tax receivables and risk for ongoing litigation, which overall account for another EUR 1.6 million increase compared to last year. On this basis, cost-to-income stands at 50%. But if we exclude the cost related to Atlantide, the ratio would be 48%. We now move on to the next slide, what we call the funding. Funding mix continues to be balanced between wholesale and retail. Now retail component is 61%, and wholesale is 39%, driven as described already many times by the strong increase in term deposits. The cost of funding at 0.8% is slightly lower year-on-year and basically stable on the quarter. Wholesale component has slightly increased quarter-on-quarter, driven mainly by higher ECB funding, which is now equal to, as already mentioned, EUR 358 million. Of that, as Mr. Garbi mentioned, the TLTRO III accounts for EUR 108 million, while the TLTRO II will be fully reimbursed in Q4. The remaining ECB funding comes from the participation to ECB auctions. As far as term deposits are concerned, as commented already, the stock has registered a stronger increase year-on-year, driven by the growth in the foreign component, which at year-end, accounts for 61% of total term deposits. The trend has inverted in the last quarter following the reduction we have applied between the interest rates offered in an effort to mitigate the massive funding inflow that we've seen in the first 3 quarters of the year. Current accounts, stock is basically stable year-on-year. Finally, we now -- we move on to the next slide to discuss the asset quality. Gross nonperforming exposures have been basically stable in the last quarters. Net bad loans represent now 1.2% of total loans and is lower versus year-end. Bad loans have decreased quarter-on-quarter and are basically stable year-on-year, unlikely to pay increase is due to factoring. And specifically, it's related to exposures versus municipalities that have entered the conservative status. We don't have any specific comments to make related to the prior year. In terms of cost of credit, the ratio is now 36 basis points, slightly higher compared to year-end 2018 on the back of higher provisions that we discussed over the year. I now hand the floor back to Gianluca to cover the last slide.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveThank you. Thank you for your explanation. And last slide is very quickly. I already have anticipated most of the numbers that are here in the upper left of the slide. The core Tier 1 ratio on a regulatory basis moved from 11.4% to 11.7%. If we take in consideration the change coming up from the change of the CQS and WA, this will be under 13.9%. So it's worth 220 basis points. In terms of total capital ratio, last year was at 14.6%, and is -- this year has moved up to 15%. From a regulatory basis, if we take the pro forma, including the change of CQ and WA, it will increase 280 basis points. Just as a reminder, the -- as we already announced the acquisition of the jewelry and the gold-backed loans from Intesa, will have an impact from 170, 180 basis points on our core Tier 1 ratio. As a final remark, as I already have mentioned, we can continue to distribute the dividend as we did in the past. So the increase compared to the past would be 7%. And based on the closing of yesterday's stock price, we represent a dividend yield of 5.1%. Now we are happy to take any of your questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Christian Carrese with Intermonte.
Christian Carrese
analystI have three questions. The first one on net interest income. I see that the spread continues to improve also in this quarter. So could you elaborate a little bit on the reason why the spread is improving? Still on net interest income, the contribution of the financial portfolio, I saw an increase quarter-on-quarter of the assets. The overall impact of TLTRO III in financial portfolio. And going forward, what should we expect as an additional margin contribution in 2020 from ECB move? And this is for net interest income. The second question is on incentives of European Court of Justice on delay from public administration, Italian Public Administration. Of course, saying that it's too long, it takes too long to pay enterprises. So if you can give us -- if there is any letter of thinking on your business? And finally, the positive one-off -- tax one-off coming from Atlantide in the fourth quarter. Could you guide us on 2020? There could be some additional positive contribution from losses coming from Atlantide -- past losses of Atlantide.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveOkay, thank you. I will leave the first and the third question to be answered by Ilaria, and I will take the second one.
Ilaria Bennati
executiveOkay. So on the income margin, as you rightly pointed out, margins have increased and they've been on a positive trend over the quarters. As explained, the increase is mainly driven by the factoring component, while the CQ margins have been more or less stable, if not, slightly decreasing. In terms of the software, there hasn't been a single driver of the good performance. Indeed, we have had the contribution for -- from different components over the quarters. For example, in the first quarter -- and the first and second quarter, cash collections have driven the margins. In the third quarter, the accrual has been a good contributor to the margin increase. And finally, in the fourth quarter, the best performer has been fiscal receivables. In fact, in the quarter, and not only in terms of origination, we have purchased a good amount of credit, we will -- which will contribute to the income generation in 2020, but also, we have received anticipated collections in terms of fiscal payment on positions that were outstanding already and which were expected to occur later next year. In terms of outlook for the margins, if that was the second part of your question, Christian, we can see stable margin -- stable margins for the factoring. We potentially -- some spikes related to fiscal credits for the reasons that I mentioned that we bought a good quantity of credits, which will potentially impact -- positively impact the P&L next year. On the commercial side, really, we see stable margins throughout the next year. In terms of CQ, margins on the CQ will probably trend a bit lower in the short to medium-term because the portfolios we buy have lower yields for various reasons. On one side, we have a lower interest rate environment, also some competitive pressure. So we are not purchasing the assets anymore at the 3.5% yield, but the yields have been compressed by 20 to 30 basis points. The contribution of the direct origination will clearly positively affect the overall margin of the CQ because the yields of the director origination are higher than the portfolio we buy. But the performance -- but the activity on the director of origination is taking a bit longer in terms of -- a bit longer time to come to effect. And so the contribution to P&L will come later in the year. Christian, I'm not sure I fully understood your questions related to the financial portfolio. Can you just please verify that?
Christian Carrese
analystYes. Sure. On slide -- let me check on the balance sheet. We see an increase in financial assets fair value of around EUR 200 million quarter-on-quarter and stable the held to collect category. Then you get some different mix in terms of TLTRO III compared to the TLTRO II, and I don't know if you can enjoy some benefit from the tiering. So I was wondering if there is any positive impact from all these moving parts in the fourth quarter? And if there is any additional contribution, positive contribution in 2020?
Ilaria Bennati
executiveOkay. So on the Govies portfolio, yes, we've had a strong performance of the portfolio over the year, which can be quantified in EUR 6.3 million as explained. There is a bit more to come in the sense that the current fair value of the positions are positive. As you know, we are not -- we don't pursue a trading activity on the portfolio. We keep it as efficient tool to optimize our funding and our need to keep liquidity on the balance sheet. If there is any specific opportunity, we might sell the portfolio. Otherwise, we'll benefit from the carry until the bonds expire. So overall, yes, positive contribution might come up.
Christian Carrese
analystCould you quantify the positive contribution net interest income from the financial portfolio?
Ilaria Bennati
executiveFor 2019?
Christian Carrese
analystYes.
Ilaria Bennati
executiveYes. EUR 3.5 million was the contribution to the net interest income. The difference today, EUR 6.3 million was coming from the sale of some positions from the trading activity. And for -- just for -- on the TLTRO, there isn't any benefit in terms of different tiering. The rate we were paying on the previous program was 0% as well as the ones we are paying on the current one. The only benefit we have is in terms of duration. You have -- the duration of the new program is longer, 1 year longer. So because of that, we can defer potentially for the refinancing of the bond that will expire in October in 2020.
Christian Carrese
analystAnd on tax rate?
Ilaria Bennati
executiveOn the tax rate, we are not expecting to see any more benefit next year. As you know, the favorable tax rate was mainly driven by the utilization of fiscal -- of past losses incurred by Atlantide, which was a one-off compensation for the year.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveI think that the tax rate need to -- or the one-off of Atlantide need to be read together with an increase of cost, operational cost and the 2 components of CET, so that is one of the points. The only probably tax things that will remain, which we have benefit this year and if government will not change in the so-called [indiscernible] that will add a positive impact, I think, of EUR 600,000.
Ilaria Bennati
executiveYes. EUR 600,000.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveAnd this will also be next year unless the government will change the tax regime. To go to the second point, the sentence of the European Court against Italy. But first of all, I think that we need to size what in our portfolio is subject to the late payment directive, because the tax credit are not part of the Late Payment Directive because tax credit are not commercial receivable. And they represent 27% of our outstanding. The subsidies, which is also another stream of asset that we typically buy also are not subject to the Late Payment Directive. So on the remaining part of the portfolio, these are the one that we subject to the [Technical Difficulty] Sorry, the Late Payment Directive. And what is interesting to read is not only the sentence coming up from the court. What is quite interesting to read is the defense that is coming up from the government, which to put it in a nutshell, the government is saying that the delay are coming, not because of liquidity, but because of actually the bureaucracy that is on the back of the payment, which defer the so called collectability of the asset. So actually, the real due date of the asset. At the end of a process that cannot be strengthening by anything but today. So that is the point of view of the government. What it could happen, I don't think that the government can actually do much compared to what we have done in the past. So we already have seen a reduction of payment on the health care sector, but that is already in our numbers. So more than that, I doubt that the health care will be able to pay faster than that. On the rest, that is related to city municipality, in particular, the situation is very difficult that the situation can actually change dramatically. We have to also see what the government intends to do, in terms of appealing against the sentence of the Court, of the European Court. Putting back the argument related, in particular, to the due date of the invoice from when the delay should be actually considered because under the Italian law, the payment can only be made when all the checks have been performed by the obligor. And from that point onward is when the payment and the delays would have to be considered. And in that respect, I think that Italy is not taking more than 45 days, more or less, to make the payments. So when the process of -- an internal process of control is performed, it may take a lot of time, in particular, in the construction sector, then the payment is not so late. Clearly, from our perspective, we buy the receivable, typically when invoice is issued. So for us, if you look at the numbers, we didn't see any reduction of payment time from the municipality in particular.
Christian Carrese
analystSorry, just lost the -- the tax credit is not subject to the directive? The other part of the loan book is not subject is?
Gianluca Garbi
executiveIts subsidies. So basically, the government subsidized the local transportation, the shipping -- there are various type of subsidy that are all allowed in Europe, that the government will use to finance or to provide us some adornment to companies that are providing public services like local transportation, where in the local transportation, clearly, the ticket is not enough to cover the cost. So for this reason, central government through the Minister of Transportation will give subsidy which is driven, I think, that by the number of kilometers, passenger, dimension of the city, there is an algorithm in order to provide this type of subsidy. Now this type of subsidy from the time that the government will start to take the process up to the time that the local transportation company receive the money can be even 2 or 3 years. And these are -- this is one of the many other subsidies. And because our subsidies -- these are not commercial credit and these are part of our business, but it's not subject to the Late Payment Directive.
Christian Carrese
analystAnd how much of the loan book is made of subsidy?
Gianluca Garbi
executiveI don't have the breakdown. I have the tax credit that is in our number. I don't -- we don't have the subsidy as...
Ilaria Bennati
executiveWe can get back on that.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveI'll come back to you on this number.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Luigi Tramontana with Banca Akros.
Luigi Tramontana
analystFirst question is on the impact that you expect on your capital and asset quality arising from the regulation. I'm referring to the calendar provisioning and the new definition of default, if any. And the second question is on the acquisition of the pawn-lending business from Intesa Sanpaolo. Do you have any update on that in terms of the impact on -- the future impact on your results that you expect? As far as understood, you are using the future relief in terms of capital arising in June '21 to immediately buy this type of business. Would you eventually be interested in further acquisitions if an Italian bank decides to exit this activity? And would you be ready to make a capital increase to fund such an acquisition?
Gianluca Garbi
executiveOkay. So on the first part, on the calendar provisioning, or I would say more in general on the front view and as definition of default. If you read what is written on the EBA Guidelines. The EBA Guidelines in line with what also the Italian government has put forward as a defense of the position and the collectability. So when if a government is due, the credit is when the process -- the internal process is ended. So based on the EBA Guidelines is talking about when the credit is fully collectible. Now if we take in consideration, when the credit is fully collectible, and this is -- is also the opinion on the association of the factoring industry, then it's from that time onward, that you have to take into consideration the delay. And in that respect, we don't see many delays that go beyond the 90 days. So if this will be confirmed, this means that will -- the impact is on -- from our perspective, is very limited, if not 0. Going to your point on the acquisition of Intesa pawnbroking. One of the -- let me say, that we are not financing the acquisition through the release of -- in 2021 of the CQ. Because actually, as I mentioned, in terms of core tier 1, the acquisition of Intesa is about 170, 180 basis points. If we consider our core Tier 1 today, we are at 100 -- at 11.7%. So basically, our core Tier 1, making this acquisition will be at 9.9%, which is above this rep and the regulatory requirement. So we are financing the acquisition, regardless the CQ. The CQ is on top of it, and actually is worth in terms of impact on the core Tier 1, is worth 120 basis points. So that clarifies the point that we don't need any capital increase, nor for the -- neither for the acquisition of Intesa business, nor for consideration on other possible transaction. Because we will add a capacity of 220 basis points. If we want to consider that our aim is to be at around 10.5% of CET1, so we have a capacity of about 160 basis points of acquisition. In any business, in the sense that it could be pawnbroking, it could be the CQ, I probably factor in not much possibility simply because we haven't seen any opportunity in the market, in general. So I don't think that the factoring can add any acquisition, M&A process in terms of acquisition from our side to any company or portfolio going forward. On the CQ as well as on the pawnbroking, maybe. In terms of pawnbroking, if we look at the survivor in the market, so taking out Intesa, there's not many. So even if we consider whatever is left in the market currently run and by other banks, we are talking about amounts that are probably in terms of outstanding less than EUR 30 million. So actually, whatever eventual acquisition, if any will have an impact. If we look at apple and apple compared to the Intesa acquisition will have an impact of 80 basis points maximum.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Filippo Prini with Kepler.
Filippo Prini
analystTwo brief questions. The first in -- on the gold backed lending. You bought basically EUR 60 million of loans in your portfolio. Which are your expectation next year and the year after, in terms of growth of these new business? I mean, is a business that is very high margins but I would like to understand if you still see room to increase this business as much as growing your business on the CQ1 turnover? And the second question, if I may get back for a second to the margins of CQ business. Could you tell us, can you share with us how much of the EUR 266 million of new turnover generated last year has come from Atlantide? And just to understand which could be the possibility of increased weight of Atlantide and then of margin maybe in the medium term?
Gianluca Garbi
executiveOkay. Thank you for both questions. I will take the first question on the pawnbroking. And I will leave to Ilaria to answer to the second on the margin. Let me -- first of all, apologize also with Tramontana of Banca Akros because he also asked the question how much is going to be the profit coming from this business after the acquisition. And I didn't answer simply because I forgot, but just let me take the opportunity to answer now. We expect to have a running profit of the EUR 3 million to pass our current profit coming from the acquisition of the portfolio of about EUR 60 million from Intesa that being added to our portfolio will be EUR 70 million. Where the growth will come from? Bear in mind that most of the players on this business, except of the newcomers but all the traditional bankers in the business. They did not develop any real strategy for the growth of the business. For instance, just as 1 point, we recently also update our app, where basically the -- our control entity, ProntoPegno, developed this app, which allows people to get closer to the possibility of using this way of financing. And we have seen an increase of use of the app, meaning that the people tend to be a bit reluctant to go in the shop, in the pawnbroking shop. More for a question of -- not be seen as a client of the pawnbroking shop. So there is a barrier, emotional barrier to this product. Now with the app, we have reduced and we are reducing this barrier. We see that people sending the -- using the app, the picture of their jewel in order to have a free estimate of how much could be worth, how much can be received in terms of financing from these asset. It's quite interesting, even though it's not a stronger statistical number that 1 out of 2 requests in that should be [appraised] So for an application online, the product you get through the emotional barrier, and you will get -- first of all, understand how much you can receive the loan is a way to increase certainly in the business. The other thing that we have done also, and we -- thanks to Intesa acquisition, what we're able also to do is -- to also strengthen the [force] in our branches where we can add a more geographical distribution of the product is organic, where, for instance, in our location Ibiza, we don't open every day, we open 2 days a week. Using the people that are the 1 that make the evaluation in -- from Milan. Now in the future, as Intesa as a branch in Florence that will be even easier to have these subsidies, the transfer, I would say, of people to run the business. So all together, with a clear strategic focus plan using new technology for a product that -- the last probably technology back middle age, so that is the -- that is where we believe that the acquisition will continue to generate more growth. Clearly, if we look at our growth organically of the pawnbroking business stand-alone, we had a growth of 70%. So I cannot say that we will continue to have a growth of 70%, but certainly, a growth of double-digit growth is feasible. I would need to Ilaria to answer on the question on the financial margin.
Ilaria Bennati
executiveOkay. So in terms of breakdown of the 2019 turnover, we have the following: EUR 266 million was the total turnover; out of that, EUR 244 million were related to the indirect origination for the acquisition of portfolio, while EUR 22 million were originated directly. The yield of the portfolio generated was -- had an average of around 3.1%, while the yield of the portfolio or the loans originated indirectly had an average of 4.4%. So as you can see, there is quite a big delta in terms of profitability of the 2 lines of businesses. Clearly, in order for the direct origination to become relevant in terms of income contribution, the size of the loans will have to dramatically increase with respect to current levels. For next year, we are targeting direct origination production, which is bigger than EUR 50 million. So it's closer to EUR 70 million. But as we said, it's taking a bit longer than expected to come to steady state. That's why I made a comment on the outlook for CQ margins to trend a bit lower in the medium -- in the short to medium-term because we need to wait a little bit longer for the direct origination to contribute.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Gentlemen, there are no more questions registered at the time.
Gianluca Garbi
executiveOkay. Thank you very much to everybody, and have a good weekend. Thank you. Bye.
Operator
operatorLadies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over. You may disconnect your telephones. Thank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Banca Sistema S.p.A. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Banca Sistema S.p.A. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.