Bank of America Corporation (BAC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 24, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Banks conference_presentation 41 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#1

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back. Good afternoon. This is my most nerve-racking presentation of the day because I'm with Paul Donofrio, the Finance Director of Bank of America, who pays the bills. But I think we're in good shape. He's joined today by Lee McEntire, Head of Group Investor Relations. Paul and Lee, thank you very much, indeed, for your time this afternoon, or this morning, indeed. Perhaps I'll kick off, Paul, if I could, with the big picture. So the last 6 months, how has the [ bank ] dealt with the last 6 months? And I guess that's across risk and client, but it's also society, the community. I think that's been quite an intense focus. Thank you.

Paul Donofrio

executive
#2

Well, thank you, Alastair. It's great to be here. Hello, everybody. In terms of how Bank of America has weathered this crisis to date, this health crisis to date, I would say that the last few months have tested us as a bank. And our grade, I would give ourselves -- I would self-grade us as receiving an A. Look, the economy is recovering from one of the worst economic periods in history. But throughout the worst of it and into the recovery now, we have continued to deliver for our customers, our communities, for our employees and for our shareholders. We're able to do this because we had transformed Bank of America over the last 10 years by focusing on our purpose, on our values and on responsible growth. That's pretty clear in a number of obvious ways. One can see it in the level of our liquidity and capital as we entered this crisis, but also in the levels of our liquidity and capital as we have moved through this health crisis. One can see in how we've delivered for communities, for our employees and for customers. Probably the best and most obvious example of that is our level of pretax, pre-provision profits over the last 2 quarters, which by the way, has been driven because of the strength of our relationships with customers, our leading market positions and the diversity of our product globally. But there are less obvious ways that are still to be demonstrated, I think, as this pandemic unfolds. As we get to the end of this crisis, we'll be able to look back at credit losses and operational losses and improved market share and reputations. And in these areas, I expect our transformation, how we have focused on responsible growth for the last 10 years, I think that's what's going to truly differentiate us as we earn our way through this crisis and come out the other side even stronger. So that's how I'd sort of set it up. And with that, maybe I'll turn it back to you for questions.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#3

So we are global, [ I'm sighting ] a rather damp global. But to a degree, [ the clues ]. Could we start with the U.S., the largest deposit taker, one of the largest payment providers. So you've a strong view of the economy. And I guess also, away from real estate, the largest commercial lender. So just a little bit of color, please, Paul, on some on the American consumer. Spending, how should we -- what are you seeing through the network? Any key differences you'd highlight by industry or by region?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#4

Sure. So you're right, Bank of America, we see about, I don't know, 15% or 20% of consumer spending in the U.S. So we have, I guess, a direct view into what the consumer is up to, at least in the U.S. Total consumer spending in the U.S. continues to improve after falling dramatically during the shutdown. Before the pandemic, we were growing in the U.S. at about 3% to 5% year-over-year, month over -- year-over-year. Since then, if you look at April, spending year-over-year fell 26%. May was down 13% year EPS -- year-over-year . June was flat year-over-year. So you can see the trend here. Then July began running ahead of last year in terms of spending year-over-year. And since then, spending has been trending up and sideways a bit. So we've seen a decent recovery overall already in consumer spending even with the economy not being fully reopened. And after going sideways for a bit, it's now moving up modestly. If you just focus in on September month-to-date, total payments are up low single digits year-over-year. And on a month-over-month basis, they're up high single digits. If you look at total payments year-to-date in total, they're about $2.2 trillion and remain flat year-over-year. As credit, bill pay, cash, checks, they all continue to be down year-over-year, which has been more than offset by increased debit spending which is more focused on everyday necessity spending here in the U.S. Unemployment insurance of $600 million a week stopped at the end of June here in the U.S. And likely because of this, we have seen some spending by lower-income families taper off a bit. But at the same time, we're seeing some benefit from those households in states around the U.S. who have started to receive the new $300 a week benefit. In terms of the industries and regions, it's what you would expect. Those industries that are more affected by the pandemic are clearly seeing -- we're seeing less spending, travel, leisure, airlines, obviously. And those industries that have benefited from people staying at home and doing more things online are doing clearly better. And from a regional perspective, it changes depending upon where the disease may be on the rise or perceived to be on the rise or getting better. It's -- but it's not -- I wouldn't say there's much of a regional effect in the U.S. It's more week-to-week, certainly, month-to-month, depending on kind of what the news flow is about the health statistics in any given region.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#5

I'll come back to business in a second, but just to dig a little further into the consumer. So between the branch network and the online presence, I mean, one assumes there's been a bit of a rebalancing back. But how -- are people dealing with bank physically again? Or are still very much online?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#6

Well, we've never been -- we never closed our branches. There were some branches around the country that, for health reasons, needed to be shut down temporarily. But our -- we're considered a necessary business or whatever, I can't remember what the exact phrase is now. But obviously, people need to transact. And so many of our employees have been either at a branch or in a back office serving our customers throughout this whole pandemic. That's not to say we haven't seen an increase in digital activity. We certainly have. If you think about digital adoption, my guess is we've accelerated digital adoption probably by, I don't know, 3, maybe 4 years because of this pandemic. If you look at some of our statistics, mobile check deposit is up 20% year-over-year. Zelle users are up close to 40% year-over-year. Zelle transactions are up 80% year-over-year. Our digital sales are up double-digit percentages. Paperless is up 20% year-over-year. Mobile banking users are up. All of the mobile activity is significantly -- the penetration has been significantly increased into our customer base. And by the way, it was never just "millennials." But certainly, in this pandemic, we've seen the older generations get much more -- interact with us in a much more digital way.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#7

Thank you, Paul. Just then shifting on to business. And starting with small business, there's been a lot written about how impacted small businesses have been. So perhaps, what's mid-market America doing as the bank sees it right now? Working capital investment or deleveraging? Is there nervousness? Or has the peak nervousness passed through?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#8

Yes. Look, again, I think that we certainly have -- when you think about small business, let's put it that way, there are small businesses all across the United States, restaurants that are involved in restaurant, leisure. Those businesses, it's been tough. I mean early on it was very tough, but there was -- we have something called a PPP here, which is a Payment Protection Program. And I think that's helped out quite a bit. I live in New York City. I can tell you that restaurants are open. We're all dining on the street, but they're open. So other than the obvious categories where we haven't seen a significant pickup yet, like for example airlines, most businesses are -- small and large, are working their way back to normal. And we're providing credit, again, to our customers and to -- for those companies that, pre-pandemic, were in our risk profile, we're out there supporting them. And they're coming back. They're just coming back very slowly.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#9

And I guess then at the top end, so in your global division, what are the biggest corporates doing after that massive draw which the bank was able to support at the heart of the crisis? What are you seeing from those companies now?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#10

Well, look, those companies were smart. They went out and raised a lot of liquidity. So we've seen record bond offerings. And basically, I think Corporate America, large corporates are -- again, putting aside the industries that are directly affected, leisure, airlines, but even -- I'll come back to them in a second. Most CFOs, CEOs, Boards, recognized we were in a health crisis, recognized they needed liquidity and they went out and they got that liquidity one way or another, either through working with their banks or hitting the capital markets. And even in those affected industries, like cruise lines, for example, they went out, they brought -- gone on and raised massive amounts of liquidity. It's been more equity, it's been slightly more expensive, but they've been out raising capital as well. So I think Boards and management teams are doing the right thing to make sure that they can weather the significant downturn in the economy we saw and the recovery, whether it's fast or slow, that's coming.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#11

So continuing on that same theme, but switching to the health of these customers. Could we talk about the credit environment a little? First, perhaps by the deferrals that banks made for consumers and for commercial clients, how that's been developing.

Paul Donofrio

executive
#12

Sure. Let me just first say on credit just generally, despite high unemployment rate here in the U.S., which now is around 8%, it was higher earlier. Asset quality, for us, has held up quite well. I won't use words like extraordinarily well, amazingly well. Let's just call it quite well. And because of our responsible growth, our mix of loans, our underwriting standards, high underwriting standards for years and years now under responsible growth, we should be, and are, reserved a bit lower than our peers. Now as you sort of noted, everyone is watching deferrals. We've been and we continue to be cautiously optimistic about our clients who took deferrals, who asked for deferrals. In the early days of the pandemic, a lot of those customers hit the deferral button, given all the uncertainty that was out there at the moment. The key now is the pace at which these borrowers return to normal status and stay current. So we granted more than 1.8 million deferrals, which peaked in early April at more than 400,000 a week. We are now down to receiving about 7,000 or 8,000 a week. That's down 98%. And 85% of the original requests were for consumers and small business cards, where 60% made a payment since that initial request and more than 30% made a payment each month since the initial request. If you look at what we said at earnings, which was mid-July, we told investors that we had 1.7 million accounts on deferral. And then a week later, when we filed our 10-Q, that number had already fallen to 1.3 million. And currently, today, we're down to less than 200,000, representing about $13 billion in balances, with only about $500 million of that in card. So why? Well, it's because as statements roll in the middle of each month, more deferrals expire, and customers have decided they don't need further assistance. So what remains important is to watch how the payment habits of these borrowers that have come off deferral progress. And what we've seen so far is that 90% of the expired deferrals across all products have made at least 1 payment. Deferral balances remaining are primarily customers in consumer real estate with longer original duration periods. And 85% of these, at least for us, have FICO scores above 680. Putting deferrals aside and just looking at actual losses, I mean, people are very focused on deferrals, but you got to look at what actually is going on with our credit quality. And if you look at non-deferred delinquencies and net charge-offs, they remain low, and they were both down from Q1 to Q2. Just to quickly finish up on deferrals. If you look at commercial deferrals, they were about 1% of balances originally and are down about 80% from original grant.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#13

Very clear. Now I've had 2 days of European banks lamenting IFRS 9 and how that's -- has mainly recognized bad loans -- loan losses very rapidly. Obviously, IFRS 9 is like the shallow end versus CECL, which is a bit, quite a thing. Is there anything that you can add on build reserve timing? How the bank is thinking about that at this point? Is there anything key building?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#14

Look, clearly, CECL, as designed, was meant for banks to build reserves early in a recession or crisis. And I think it's working that way. We've got 2 quarters here where we've built significant reserves. The way CECL works, for those who may not be familiar with CECL, we have to look at our balance sheet at a point in time at the end of the quarter. And we have to look at all of our loans and a few other assets beyond just loans. And we have to say, "Well, how much reserve do we need as a company to account for all of the expected losses for that portfolio at that moment over the lifetime of those loans and assets?" And so that forces you, as you enter into a recession, to add significant reserves, and that's what we did. And what -- but once you build those reserves, then the question really becomes, from that moment, "Okay. How does your portfolio change quarter-to-quarter? Is it getting bigger? Is it getting smaller? What's the mix doing?" Because that could affect your reserves that you're going to need. And how is your view of the recovery, or what's going to happen in the future, changing? And so we may add a little bit to our reserves this quarter. We'll have to see. But it will be because of what we've seen probably in specific credits as opposed to a significant change in our portfolio because it really hasn't changed that much in the quarter. And if you think about how we're proceeding in terms of the recovery, is it really that different this -- at the end of this quarter than it was at the end of the last quarter? So I wouldn't expect to see, at least U.S. banks, have significantly differences or changes or builds or reductions because I think it's a little early for reductions in their reserves. But you could see some movement on the margin depending on what their experience is with the individual credits. The only other thing I'll say about reserves, if I can. There's a lot of discussion, press out there about reserve builds in one quarter and who had a bigger reserve build, who had a smaller reserve build. We have to -- you have to remember, particularly in the first quarter you're building your reserve, all you're doing -- a bank has loss-absorbing capacity. And that loss-absorbing capacity is your equity and your reserves. And all you're really doing when you build a big reserve is moving loss-absorbing capacity from one place on your balance sheet to the other place on your balance sheet through the income statement. You haven't really changed the loss-absorbing capacity of the bank. You just moved it from one place in the balance sheet to another. And so it's important that we do that. Those are the rules. And it gives everybody some more transparency in what we're thinking about potential losses going forward. But what's really important is your ability, I think, to -- what's really important is how you run your company for the last 5 years, what your loan portfolio looks like, how carefully you've been with your underwriting standards, how carefully you've been managing your businesses, your policies. That's going to show up in operational losses. That's what's important. It's not about what you do with 1 quarter into the crisis. It's about what you've done for years leading up to the crisis in terms of building a quality loan portfolio. And it's about your ability to create profits in the crisis. So that's why PPNR is so important. And that's why the strength of your franchise, your relationships, the diversity of your products are so important, so you can earn your way and build even more capital, which I think you're going to see a lot of banks in the U.S. do in this crisis, build even more capital and liquidity, as you work your way through the crisis.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#15

Very clear. I think we're going to be discussing this here in Europe still 12, 15, 18 months from now. There's going to be some laggards in making provisioning. So maybe we'll come back to that next year and compare notes. Just shifting back up to the top of the P&L. So net interest income, that's been a topic of every presentation in Europe because we're suffering from negative rates in a number of markets who have had meaningful rate cuts. Clearly, the Fed's moves -- the Fed's responsible moves to help the system have cost a significant cost for a bank like this with the interest rate sensitivity and the rate structure. We have -- so I know the company provided a little update at a competitor conference last week, but could you just refresh us with the net interest income picture for the bank right now?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#16

Yes. Sure. I guess I would start by reminding everyone that we have lived through low rates before in the first half of this decade. And since then, i.e., since late 2015, when the Fed started to raise short-term rates, we've added about $500 billion of deposits and $150 billion of loans. So right from the beginning, we're in a better position from a balance sheet perspective than we were back then. However, the environment is definitely more challenging today than in the first half of the decade because today, both short- and long-term rates are ultra low. Back then, long-term rates were higher than they are today. So what does that mean? That means all these extra deposits that we've gathered are earning less, whether we keep them in short-term investments like cash or we invest them longer term. Plus, lower long-term rates have produced increased mortgage refinancings here in the U.S., which has accelerated the amortization of bond premiums in our -- on our mortgage-backed securities, which also gets recognized in NII. Having said all that, early in this crisis, we were keeping the growth in deposits that we experienced all in cash. Today, we've started to invest in higher-yielding securities, which will help. And then turning to loans, which is the other key driver of NII, commercial loan demand, I think, reflected panic-borrowing in Q1 which was quickly paid off in Q2. And since then, demand has been soft, and many companies have raised capital, as I said earlier, in the capital markets. So we have continued to see commercial loans trend lower. With respect to consumer loans, demand for mortgages has been strong and auto lending has been good, but credit cards, which are our highest-yielding loans, continue to decline as credit card spending continues to be low and people are paying down their balances. At Q2 earnings, we expected NII to be down a couple of hundred million linked-quarter. Brian was at a conference just a week ago and kind of updated our perspective on that. We now think that the prepayments and the additional pressure on loans has accelerated us getting to an NII trough. NII might be as low as $10.3 billion in the third quarter. That's down roughly $700 million quarter-over-quarter. Before we could see it move sideways to modestly up in subsequent quarters, dependent on more stable rates and our ability to redeploy capital into higher-yielding assets which would help offset reinvestment of maturing assets in lower-yielding securities.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#17

And then one of the big topics, I guess, in the last few years around the room, what's the value of deposits? And now is probably a good time to ask because the banks have quite a lot of deposits. I think, well, we have 18% in consumer and 20-odd in Global Banking. But obviously, the yield on those is -- or the income from those is down. What do you think happens now with those? Do consumers spend them? Do they invest them possibly elsewhere in the firm? Do they draw them down because they need that income? And then one step back, how do you think of the value of deposits in this very low rate environment?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#18

Well, look, deposits, right off the bat, I'll just say, deposits are enormously valuable, and they create the foundation of the value creation of any bank, but certainly our bank. And even in a low-rate environment, they're enormously valuable. And again, I would -- [ the scoop of the day is ] our PPNR in this crisis, the level of earnings that we're getting, that's from a lot of different things. Don't get me wrong, but deposits are a core component of how we create value and earnings at Bank of America and in, indeed, any bank. We are gathering more deposits. I would say we're getting our fair share, if not more than our fair share, if you look at the growth of our deposits and the growth in deposits just generally here in the U.S. And I think customers are attracted to our franchise for all sorts of reasons. We've talked about some of them in terms of our award-winning, leading digital capabilities; our high-touch, high-tech kind of approach to dealing with customers, the personalization that we bring in terms of how they can interact with us; our branch network. So we're getting our fair share of deposit growth here in the U.S., if not more. The question you're asking, I think, is we've seen deposit balances go up in aggregate and we've seen deposit balances in individuals' accounts go up in this pandemic. So if you look at, especially lower-income people, year-over-year, they had -- if you looked at their checking account, it was probably up 150% from where it was a year ago. So they are going to start to spend that, there's no question, as things get better. But there's just more reserves in the financial system. The Fed is adding reserves into the financial systems through quantitative easing. And through the multiplier effect, that's just creating more deposits here in the U.S. So we've gotten more and more comfortable as this pandemic transverses itself. Or as health statistics get better, as the economy starts to improve, we've gotten more and more confident that those deposits -- a big chunk of those deposits are going to stay with us. And that's why, by the way, we've gone from holding virtually all of the excess deposits that we earned or gathered in cash, to now, we're starting to deploy those deposits in longer-term securities.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#19

Now if you could touch on expenses. I'm pleased that you've invested in the IT. So it's worked this week. A very strong track record on cost management. Just help us think about the moving parts and the levers right now. I guess there's been a COVID expense you've called out, but there's been a tech spend that you've been running consistently through the P&L. And then there's also the payments business, which has been brought back in house. What's our best way of thinking about the cost longer term?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#20

Sure. So I think you got it. I mean, we're incurring a lot of additional expense for COVID costs right now, about $400 million net of savings. So we're spending X more for COVID, but we've got a bunch of savings like travel and internal meetings, all those sorts of things. But the net of all that is an increase of around $400 million as we do the right thing for our customers and our employees in this health crisis in terms of keeping them safe. To offset this, we remain very diligent on all of our cost initiatives, which basically can be summed up as operational excellence. That's the main way we will drive down costs in a sustainable way during this pandemic. But even more in the long term, I would expect expenses to remain elevated through year-end. As associates and customers figure out school and public transportation options, we're going to need to keep support in place for our teammates and for our customers. So last quarter, we were running at about $13.4 billion, $13.5 billion in expense. And if you add the expense of our merchant banking products and services, which we used to be netted against revenue under [ JBE ] accounting in the first half of the year, we expect to be around sort of $13.7 billion or so in the third quarter. We'll obviously be working to continue to bring down those costs over the following quarters, balancing associate and customer safety with the need to find ways to make ourselves more efficient. The only other point I would add, we talked about it earlier but I'll emphasize it again, digital adoption by our customers during this pandemic has probably accelerated adoption, digital adoption, by a number of years. And digital adoption is probably one of the best ways to sustainably lower costs. So as we get through this pandemic, I think some of that benefit will start showing up in our run rate. I should also say, as Brian mentioned this at that competitor conference, we're going to have a couple of unusual items this quarter. We will book a tax benefit of $700 million from the revaluation of our U.K. tax asset, given the expected increase in the U.K. tax rate. Or I should say that it was expected to come down, but I guess it's not going down by 2%. However, we expect a significant portion of this benefit to be offset by some litigation costs as we work to resolve some older cases that have become, in the accounting parlance, more estimatable and probable. And so we're moving those -- that expense from our P&L to our actual litigation reserve. And again, that will flow through the income statement when we do that.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#21

Just to round that, so I've got questions to go all the way. There is a couple of minutes. If people want to type questions in, you need to be quite quick because there's a few here, and I'm going to ask one more before I go to them. Just on capital invest, Paul, one of the things that struck me is Bank of America came in on the capital side with a drawdown below its minimum stress capital buffer, which I think a few years ago would not have been likely to be the case. So sort of a 2% drawdown versus a 2.5% minimum. So I guess, probably a simple answer to this, but are you taking enough risk versus how the regulation is set in?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#22

Yes. We're taking it -- we -- look, we have values. We have a purpose, we have values, we have responsible growth and we have a very strong risk framework. We're running this company to be able to deliver for customers or communities or the general public through the cycle. So we want to be able to not only get an adequate return in good times, but we want to make sure we're strong enough to deliver for everybody, including our shareholders, in the worst of times. So we've got a very strong risk framework. We think that's the right strategy for us. We think that you're going to see the benefit of that coming out of this crisis in terms of market share, reputation and our profits just during the crisis. We're delivering a lot of capital and balance sheet to our customers in the middle of this crisis. We're able to do that because of how we run the company over the last 10 years. We're able to defer payments. We're able to do all the right things for communities, for people, for employees, customers because of how we run this company, because of our risk framework. And when times were better, we were getting a very adequate return on our capital. So again, I think risk/reward, I think you can see it. And now when times aren't so good, I think you're going to see us continue to get, relative to today's interest rates, an adequate return. And you're going to see, I think, us come out of this crisis stronger than ever in terms of how customers feel about us, how much business they do with us, our market share, et cetera. So yes, I think we're taking enough risk. And we'll take perhaps more risk than we took maybe in March in the depths of this crisis as we get a better sense of how it's all going to unfold. The good news is we have the capital, we have liquidity to service our customers and communities. In fact, as I said, we're certainly building liquidity, you've seen that. And we're -- despite all that's going on, despite all those reserves, we -- our capital position is getting stronger as well.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#23

I'm going to try and synthesize 2 of the questions from the audience here. So both around what you mentioned, the Fed balance sheet expansion, which is creating liquidity in the system. Right now, for the bank, that doesn't consume leverage capital because the Fed exempted cash and treasuries temporarily. But can you kind of rely on that for how you positioned the bank? And are there other tripwires as the balance sheet grows, for example, in the Basel GSIB calculations or elsewhere in the capital? There's so many moving parts, I guess, joining them up is the tough piece.

Paul Donofrio

executive
#24

Yes. Look, you're right. The leverage rules here in the U.S., which I think are gold-plated relative to some of the rules around the world, clearly, as we get more deposits, our supplemental leverage ratio is lower because we have a certain amount of capital, which, again, I think is improving in this crisis. But with all these deposits coming in, that denominator is getting bigger and bigger very quickly. It would be the right thing for regulators to exclude those deposits, particularly the ones invested or we put into cash or the head of treasuries, but we'll see how that unfolds. Right now, it's not constraining us as a bank. If deposits continue to grow, someday maybe it will, but it's not constraining us right now. So that's the leverage ratio. On GSIB, it's kind of the same story, right? I mean, the GSIB, at least how it's gold-plated here in the U.S., size is a factor, and your size can be influenced by how many deposits you take in. It can just be influenced by the way, just because your stock price goes up or down. And it's not indexed in any way to growth in the economy. So when they set the rule, the number was x. And they -- it's not indexed if the economy grows or shrinks. So there's some things that regulators can do to improve the framework, and you've hit upon, I think, 2 of them.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#25

Just time for a very final one, which is, I guess, play to the balance you've filtered out with the banks. So the question is really, with interest rates so low for companies, corporations, do companies need a bank loan? And in a way, does it matter to Bank of America if they prefer to raise the money in the capital markets because it's cheaper right now, net of terms and conditions?

Paul Donofrio

executive
#26

Well, I'm not sure I quite understand the first part of your question, but in terms of the second part, we obviously are in the enviable position of having a very strong capital markets business and having a diversified product set. So more narrowly, if someone doesn't borrow the money from us and instead -- and raises it in the capital markets, we have the opportunity to help them do that and earn a fee. And in fact, you've seen our investment banking fees and sales and trading activity improved significantly in this crisis. And in terms of investment banking fees, that's for 2 reasons. One, there's been more activity in the capital markets. But two, we've been taking share for many, many quarters in investment banking now. And so we had very strong results in investment banking in the second quarter, and I would expect that -- again, there hasn't been as much issuance in the third quarter, but in terms of market share, I would expect to have strong performance here in the third quarter as well. More broadly, just stepping away for a second and not focusing just on capital market fees, if you just think about fees more generally, we're in -- we're faring much better than many banks who derived the vast majority of their revenue from NII. So we have -- because we have a wealth management business; sales and trading business; again, an investment banking business, all those parts of our business have actually done a little better in this pandemic than the year-ago period. And even in consumer fees like card and service charges, where you've seen some decline early in this crisis, we're starting to see improvement now as well.

Alastair Ryan

analyst
#27

That was the whole question, Paul. You got the whole thing. We are out of time. That's been great. Really appreciate it, very much value your time today. And hopefully, we can see you again next year.

Paul Donofrio

executive
#28

I look forward to it. Thank you. Goodbye, everybody.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Bank of America Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Bank of America Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.