Bank of America Corporation (BAC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 30, 2024

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Banks conference_presentation 50 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

John McDonald

analyst
#1

Okay. We're ready to get going. Thanks, everyone. We're very happy to have Bank of America back today, CEO, Brian Moynihan. Brian, thanks so much for coming back.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#2

John, it's been many times. Good to see you again.

John McDonald

analyst
#3

Great. Well, I think we'll start off like we always do with your macro view. It's been almost a year since the last Fed hike. Unemployment's good, but inflation a little sticky. What's your recent Bank of America data telling you about the health of consumer?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#4

So a couple of things, I think, would be of interest to your colleagues here. Number one, if you look at what we talk about a lot is the spending, the money moving through the consumers' accounts, which is $4 trillion-plus a year, which is money moving out in the economy: cash out of the ATMs, checks written, settle payments, debit and credit cards. And if you look year-to-date, that's growing about 3.5%. So that number doesn't mean a lot. Most of that has a context. If you looked at it May of '23 versus May of '22, it'd probably been like high single digits, maybe even double digits. So it slowed down coming through the summer of last year and sits at a level which is about where it would be in a very low-growth, low-inflation environment economy, sort of where it was at [ '16, '17, '18 ], actually a little bit under that. That would be more a 4. And it's being -- so that's one, it's aggregate level. The growth rate has slowed. It is still growing, but it has slowed. It's consistent where it was when we had more of a normalized environment around us. And the way people are spending money is consistent with what you read about, which is it's on experiences. It still is being driven at the margin by travel, entertainment and things like that. And other things have moderated, except for insurance payments, which we can see people pay insurance. And so it's good. And so that's good news. And if you go and -- but it has slowed down. And I think it sets up the question, we got to keep the consumer in the game in the U.S. economy because it's such a big part of it. And they get a little more tentative. And that is due to everything going on around them. Goods are more expensive, they're shaping the spending. They're going to 3 grocery stores instead of 2 is one of the stats we see. Interesting part as it relates to inflation is the rental payments by our -- that checks out for rental payments, they're now tipping over and the growth rate is slowing, which if you listen to inflation experts, they'll say they had to see that tip over to fuel inflation was really on a downward path. So that's where we're seeing our consumer. Our general estimates are that inflation takes until the end of next year to get to control the economy basically bounce around a 2% growth rate. So it's a trend. There's no soft landing of space, it lands a trend and bounces around 1.5% to 2% all the way through next year. It doesn't reaccelerate. It takes cuts -- 4 cuts next year, 2 cuts a year after and 1 this year is kind of what the core economics team has. But overall, you see the consumer activity is okay. But the commercial...

John McDonald

analyst
#5

Yes. And how about on the commercial side, what are you -- how are the clients adjusting to this environment?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#6

I mean there -- the cost of borrowing has gone up, so they're careful. And so the line usage has moved up a hair, but it's sort of sitting there. So if you think about the path we've been on prepandemic, small businesses and middle-market companies, we use in lines in the low 40s percentage as an average amount of usage as 100% they could borrow. It fell to 30%, it's back up 35%, 36%, but it's not really going up anymore. And so when you talk to our commercial customers, they're basically saying, "I'm making money. I'm fine. I'm worried about every possibility you can lay out, the wars, the China trade war, elections," they can say it. But everything's okay, but I'm -- therefore, because it costs me more money to borrow, I'm being a little less aggressive. And so again, they're okay, too. So I think in some ways, the war on inflation has been being won and isn't over yet. And both of our customer bases have a lot to do with how the American conforms are both saying, "You know what, I'm being careful slowing things down. Still growing, still feel good about my overall business. But I'm not hiring as much. I'm not buying equipment as fast. I'm not making a commitment to software purchases as fast." All that's sort of moderated. And then on the other hand, I'm not laying off a lot of people. I'm not -- I'm trying to manage this business carefully. And I think they're good managers, and that's what they're doing. And -- but by the way, when you think about that in terms of our bank balance sheet, the credit risk then is in good shape. And so you're not seeing any vagaries and credit risk across the portfolios, broadly speaking. We talk more about that. But -- so that's where you'd start to see evidence of stress, and we don't see it on the consumer side for sure, and we don't see it on the commercial side either.

John McDonald

analyst
#7

Okay. So let's leave the macro a little bit. This is called Strategic Decisions Conference. And for years that you've been coming here, you talked about the organic engine of strong account customer growth. So let's just talk about a little bit about how you strategize for compounding that customer growth across all your different businesses. Maybe we'll start with the consumer bank. You've had 21 straight quarters of new checking account growth. And this quarter alone, a lot of good new checking accounts, credit cards. What are the key drivers of this? And what's your differentiated kind of proposition to consumers that helps that?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#8

So I think -- so if you think of Bank of America, we have general consumers, wealthy consumers, small, medium, large businesses in the markets business. And what makes us a bit unique is these continuums which link the businesses together from a person opens their first account to becoming John McDonald making tons of money and investing and things like that.

John McDonald

analyst
#9

I wish. Oh, we wish.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#10

Yes. And so the idea is that continue as a value add. So as you think about running the business, you're thinking about short term, you got to grow the organic growth in the long term, how do I knit it together. So in the consumer business, at the end of the day, in the mass-market retail business, which is 60%, 70% of the activity, about 20% of the deposits and profit. That is about managing costs and a great customer experience, and team has done a great job. And basically being very fair to the customers, so no overdraft checking, low balance accounts, short-term loans for $5 that they can borrow in a couple of times a year and pay back over 90 days, so things like that. And that's gone on. And you can see that, and that's very stable. But they provide the start of that continuum because that's -- our children opened their first bank account to then go to college and become successful. That's the college student open their first bank account on their own type of thing. And so that goes in the preferred business, which is the upper part of that, completely different revenue model, acquire the accounts, grow them. Merrill Edge becomes important, and that's going. So if you look at it more broadly, what's the thing? Optimize the cost, especially around the mass-market movement by pushing people to see the wonders of digitization. So whether it's Erica or whether it's Zelle or whether it's the ATM network or whether it's all the other things in the mobile app, which is now the dominant way people interface, where there's 1 billion-plus digital interactions a quarter by our consumers, to give you a sense. So it's a big thing. You keep pushing that to keep the cost and then you invest the benefits of that into the customer experience and then you grow the upper part of that customer base, and that is your million net new checking accounts every year in [ 20 some 5 ] years of it. And underneath that, you're optimizing everything you can.

John McDonald

analyst
#11

How about the importance of branches? We've heard from yourself, from Aron Levine, Dean about your financial incentive strategy, and you've been on offense in terms of growing. How important are branches still to driving organic growth?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#12

So half the sales are digital, which means the other half are not digital. So you need both. And that's the magic of having. But the configuration of branches in 2007, after LaSalle transaction, we ended up with the peak number branch of 6,000. We're down to about 1,300 or so now. In that dynamic, there's a second dynamic, which is the branch size went from probably an average colleague size of 5 to 10. And then what the people did went from service to sales and relationship management. And so that -- so even though it looks like you're down 2,000 branches, and there's a massive change underneath that. And so that's what the team has been optimizing, and that allows us to invest in the future. So what are we doing? If you look down the top 100 markets, and we plan to get to a top position in all those markets, and that's a lot of work ahead of us. The first thing we had to do is go to market as we went in, and that started about 8, 10 years ago now where we build out in Minneapolis and Denver and places like that. Then -- and you had to keep that going first, the top 30 markets you weren't in and then the top 50 and then beyond, and we're completing that task. And then at the same time, you had to densify where you weren't dense enough to get the branch part of it. And then you had to undensify where you were too dense, I mean, get rid of branches where they're too close together and didn't provide the capability and you couldn't get ahead of the customer. And so in that period, 6,000, 4,000 branches, 100,000 people plus to 60,000 people, probably 25,000 service-oriented teammates and branch like 10,000, you have sales-oriented teammates from 5,000 up to 10,000 or 15,000. You put that all together, and what you have is a business which is 3 to 4x bigger transaction-wise, balance-wise, et cetera. And the efficiency of it has gone from 300 basis points of cost of deposits. In other words, cost of operating all the retail consumer business over the deposit base, it's about 140 or whatever it is today. And the customer score has gone from 60% to 90% -- 60% to 85%. So you're seeing the Top 2 Box score lift. That's an attrition go down, and that's the magic the team has done a great job with. But branches are critical to that because at the end of the day, half the transactions where we open those million check accounts are going in the branch because whatever personal proclivity they have, the idea is we don't want to make them decide. Is it more efficient one way? Sure, but not for everybody if they can't get it done, so you want to do.

John McDonald

analyst
#13

Yes. One of the debates this week has been whether banks have kind of cracked the code on pairing wealth management with mass affluent and consumer. It feels like BofA has done that. The growth in Merrill Edge suggests good progress. What's kind of the report card there? And what's the longer-term opportunity for you there?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#14

Well, the distinct advantage we have is when historically, pre-Merrill transaction at '09, you had a wealth management business that had sort of a bank-level brokerage business and then you had the Private Bank and you had a hole in the middle. So Merrill obviously fills that hole. 600 offices, you're [ in all the cities ], your financial adviser force second to none, et cetera, et cetera. But you had to also not be unmindful if there's a hole that can also exist, which is the investor starting before they get interesting to the financial advisers of private banker. That's what Merrill Edge does. It's now at $450 billion to $500 billion in assets. It started a -- we all talked about robo-advisor at the time. Its product is called MEGI. It's up to $20-odd billion or something like that there from scratch a few years ago. Digitally oriented, investor-oriented average account size coming on is $60,000. So this is not geared to people -- this is geared to people who are serious about their financial planning. But if you look down that list of 3.5 million or whatever odd customers it is, it's growing 10% a year. Those customers are the G1 customer of the future. Again, that continuum. So we can see it and we can do it, can also use it to service. So like for us, we give stock to -- as part of our annual awards to all our employees. So they all have Merrill Edge accounts. We do that with other employers so they all have Merrill Edge accounts. And therefore, you're starting them off and then you work them over time. And so it makes some money. It does a great job. It has a significant amount of deposits attached to customers of that business that came to that business. But at the end of the day, it's that continuum filling in, so it continues to grow. So it's -- the $4 trillion customer assets we have in wealth management, about 10% of it is in there.

John McDonald

analyst
#15

So that graduation strategy is working?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#16

Yes. And it happens more than through the Merrill Edge. It happens through the whole franchise. So one of the things that we work hard on is the entrepreneur is in the Merrill to do business with this company with us vice versa in the Private Bank. And so there's a lot of referrals that we count and goal in the market and celebrate their success and talk to all those market presence to help that local team out, the local banks while they have these global resources. And Merrill Edge fits into that. But it's also the people side of that, too, the financial advisers, private bankers, middle-market bankers, business bankers in all those smart consumer teammates. There's literally hundreds of thousands of leads that go from that consumer business to Merrill to figure out if they can do it. And right now, if you put it all together, that happens about 9 million times a year with about a 40% success rate, which people just don't move their accounts for kicks, you have to bring them something in, so it's pretty good right now.

John McDonald

analyst
#17

So Bank of America is a global company. I'm not sure investors fully appreciate that roughly 15% of your revenues come from international sources. So can you give us some perspective on your international businesses and where you're investing for growth there?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#18

So if you think about the business in international are really, obviously, the markets business because it's a global business to support the investors and bring in sites around the world and the research platform supporting that and the execution capability supporting that in all the major markets in the world. So that's kind of an obvious thing. You can't be a local capital markets player to be the scale size. So we're [ 1/3, 1/4, ] of the business going to go for global corporate investment banking, same drill. These are multinational companies. They operate around the world. They're trying to buy companies in all these different jurisdictions. You're trying to help them do that. They have cash needs across the globe. So we do that. That's corporate banking, investment banking and transaction services, GTS as we call it. And even the middle market, we do a fair amount, but it's much, much more directed. So obviously, in the North American side in Canada and Mexico, integrating middle-market franchises there, they're in the supply chains. We just -- we're doing it more in Europe now. The stability of the economy is the integration of world supply chains, the ability to understand the auto suppliers all over the world to supply into that might be family-owned businesses, wonderful businesses that we support. So we do that. And then for the private equity firms and their buyouts, the ones we do business with, which are a lot, but we also are trying to help them when they're buying a $0.5 billion company or $1 billion company as opposed to the biggest deals. And so we got a lot of room to grow on that. And then the cash management that's all together, we're making hundreds of millions of dollars a year investments in cash management generally to have that digital capability in CashPro and everything. But on top of that, we're driving the international piece of that heavily because the enablement for real-time payments in India, the enablement for -- we do. Some stuff we are the most of, like the bank notes program to all around the world is something we do that market share is very high. But other stuff, we have a lot of room to grow for corporates and moving money. And so we're building out that cash management. So it's 15% of our revenue, it's growing. It's in the GCIB space and larger corporate space. It is $100 billion in outstanding loans. So it's a big business now, and we'll keep investing in it. And Matthew Koder and Bernie Mensah runs international, Matthew runs GCIB, and Jimmy runs markets. Jimmy DeMare runs markets. They've done a great job. But we're very precise on where we're going and why and which clients so we can make sure we keep the risk where we want as we drive the business.

John McDonald

analyst
#19

Any thoughts someday of taking the consumer show on the road internationally and...

Brian Moynihan

executive
#20

We looked at that a decade ago on an online basis. And we decided that if we worked our tail off with a reasonable market share in the jurisdictions that matter, we could get $60 billion, $80 billion of deposits. It's like a bad quarter if we -- a bad year-over-year performance in consumer in the normal times. I mean now we get deposits all over the -- you run around circles. But if you looked at it, you say, "So why would I waste my time doing that when I'm not in Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati and Indianapolis and Minneapolis and Denver? Why wouldn't I fill out the franchise and spend my efforts there?" Because our market share in consumer is we've got a $950 billion in deposits or whatever it is. We're still only about 13%, 14%. So there's a lot to take, an efficiency that is incrementally extreme. And so we looked at it. We always will keep looking at it, but it's not something -- in doing it, we don't really add value on a branch-based business in country X. I don't know what's -- because it's so local. And so I don't know what we really bring to it. On digital, we have great digital capacity. The question is, can you make it meaningful enough to make a difference instead of investing that money? One -- theoretically, one set of rules, one set of regulations, one language and Spanish too, but you can then get lots of leverage.

John McDonald

analyst
#21

Yes. And you mentioned the U.S. retail share being in the low teens. And JPMorgan talked about that yesterday, and they have aspirations to get to mid-teens, maybe 20% over time. Is that something fully in the possibility for you as you think about your share aspirations?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#22

I think we've moved up over the last decade or so, probably 2 to 3 percentage points. And there's multiple ways to play against that, right? One is just being a good competitor in the place which we're already pretty sizable. But there's a lot of markets where literally, we have a lot of room to go. So if you look in some of these markets, we've gone from literally not being in there in the retail business. We may have had a Merrill teammates there, we may have had a private banking or commercial teammates there, take Pittsburgh. We bring in the branches and suddenly, we move up in deposits and we move ourselves up the chain. And the idea is not to stop. Let's keep going up. And so going back to why we focus on that is there's lots of room. And there's a lot of companies that deal with the mass American consumer base that have a lot higher market share in their line of business than their products and services than we do. It just takes good organic attitude and growth. And so we're sitting at a 14% share. That's usually measured by deposit balance. Our reach to customers is actually much higher than that, and sort of filling in all that is part of the challenge.

John McDonald

analyst
#23

So we talked a little bit about digital. But just if we look at that, you've got a lead position clearly. You made a lot of progress in retail and digital. How much runway is there still? And what are the runways for financial benefits from digitization across consumer and commercial from here still?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#24

I think it's still high because go to half -- 10 years ago, the sales of the products weren't enabled. Now they're enabled. Now we're at half-half, other half. And you're saying, "If half the people can do, why aren't the other half doing?" So what's the change? What's going to cause them to change? Some it's personal preference. That's going to be a while. Other people just knowledge, not knowing exists and they can do all that stuff. So there's just a lot of room to go. And so you take retail wire sending and now you can go on and send out a wire, that -- remember, that process to do that was a time consuming for the person, it costs money. It costs money for them and we charge them a fee. And now they can kind of do it a lot faster on their own.

John McDonald

analyst
#25

It's a pain. It's a pain.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#26

Yes. But it's simple now. You just go...

John McDonald

analyst
#27

Yes, it's easy.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#28

And so as we think about just a lot of room to go from efficiency, from a sales and then information flow, and we are supplying lots of information. So that 1.2 billion digital interactions a quarter plus and growing at 10%, 15% a year is just a lot of information where we can have an intimacy with the customers and do offers with Bank of America deals that very few people know exist. But it's a major -- it keeps growing and growing, and we can offer that to our clients, the commercial clients to provide benefits to the types of deals we can do that we just did with Starbucks announced where we use our brand, their brand to generate activity. These are -- but it's all digitally, we can't do that. It's not a branch pay. So it's just a lot ahead of us. And then you bring it into even wealth management, even though 80-plus percent, I think 85% of the customers digitally interact with, it's probably 15% of their interactions. And so the question is what else can you do? So signing document is critical, got that delivery of performance review. All the stuff you can do, you can keep adding that on. And so even if something as mundane as depositing a check, right now, 10% to 15% of the checks are still deposited physically at the branch, 85% aren't. And of that 85% round number split half to the mobile app and half through the ATM. And you're saying, Basically, can't we get all those mobile ATM -- all those ATMs to go to the mobile app?" And checks continue to decline, which is good because the other payments are more efficient, more effective, more secure. The question is, what's the holdup? So we spend a lot of time saying, "What's going to get John McDonald to change his personal behavior and how do we serve him the advice that would help them do that when they're ready?" And we don't ever try to force it, but we basically make -- educate people. And so Erica I read probably got 14 other sessions talk about AI going on at any given moment. Now Erica is a natural language processing, algorithm-driven model based on questions, and it now is 18, 20 million customers using it, growing 25% usage 5 years in. Every one of those would have been a phone call or a text or something. And so there's just ways that we can continue to drive the digitization. Even though you'd look at it and say, "Well, it's pretty mature." It's not -- it's mature, but it's not mature across every possible segment. And then the new offerings are not even found yet.

John McDonald

analyst
#29

What are some of the other use cases for AI for banks in general across consumer and commercial? And then where are we on kind of that adoption and realizing some of the benefits today I can offer in terms of efficiencies and revenue growth?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#30

We're early on because what's -- as I look at the providers of this, what the realization they've come to, which is the right one for people like us, as you think about how AI will be delivered in our franchise, a lot of them are saying, "I will take a model which is more tailored and put it on your premises on your data that will get the benefits of all this education learning we have but doesn't have you susceptible to proving which data helped you make the decision, i.e., not your data or some other input, which has a benefit of not being sold or inclusive, you run out of power, trying to have it operate." And we can train it and make it specific to -- effectively, that's what we do with Erica, but these will be much more sophisticated models. So that's coming out. So that's a standalone. And we think there's high value on that because it stops issues of data exfiltration and where its model and how it's decisioned and things that you can do by doing that. We know that because we've seen that, Erica. It's just that most of the really avant-garde people pushing out saying, "No, I'll just give you a license and your teammates can use it." So that's going on. The second thing is the major software providers are betting in the software. So all the major companies are sitting there saying, "I can bring AI embedded in my software so we're going to get the benefits of that." That might be Salesforce and the Salesforce management process, that literal relationship management process. It might be Workday and the other process. It might be the general ledger and the -- so there's information flow and stuff. So that's going to come.

John McDonald

analyst
#31

And that's all early still?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#32

Yes, that's all early, just coming at us like literally as we speak. And then the third element will be sort of the stand-alone public models and how you use them, which really is probably further out there. And then the fourth element is using the coding-type platforms, which are part of that public, available. We already do that. I think we have 1,000, 1,500 people coding on it every day, and we're building that literally as we speak. And they're finding efficiencies and effectiveness. They're also finding difficulties with it because how efficient is it, the people's personalities to write code, we're working through that. So what we're using it, obviously, Erica, obviously, code, we already use a lot of -- all our credit decisions are and consumer made automatedly. It's not with one of those models, but a model we developed over years and years. But we think there's high hope ahead of us for internal efficiency, software development. And then these models, like the thousands and thousands of filings we make, just checking them so we don't have to redo work. It's all about eliminating work and not having to redo it and being able to check at a pace and find things and help do things that will make a human more efficient. And you still would have a human touch in front of it, a lot of stuff. We can't file a piece of paper and say, "Oh, the model got it wrong for some regulatory report." So you need an interface, but you can save a lot of work before that. And that's what we're trying to do. So laws, rules and regulations, pulling them together, there's new models there, which would be interesting to help you more quickly take all that stuff that goes on, all the jurisdictions we do and put it in a way that people can read it and understand it. And they're going to be experienced people. So they're going to know if it's out of whack. But you're not necessarily saying I'm going to make the decision to do something with that. You're going to help. And so I think very early stages, we've seen it work. I mean we've seen it work to -- we're 2 billion interactions on Erica. And it took 4 years to get the first billion and about 5 quarters to get the second billion, and it's growing to 20%, 25% a year. The customers like it, we like it. And that's a very constrained, narrow case that if you start to get broader, you'll see.

John McDonald

analyst
#33

Yes. So as you get more comfortable with that, the way that digitization has created efficiency the way Erica has AI more broadly should continue to do that?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#34

And ultimately -- remember, we started -- when the management team was put together in 2010, we had 295,000 people. We went up to 305,000 people. We have 211,800 people as of last Friday. The company is bigger, the amount of activity is bigger, the complexity of the market-facing business is higher, the amount of loans. You pick. Yes, almost 100,000 less people. And it's pretty interesting. And that's just with old technologies coming through. Wait until some of this stuff comes through.

John McDonald

analyst
#35

Great. Okay. Let's go back to old-school stuff, talk a little bit about deposits. How are deposit balances kind of mix or pricing performing so far in the second quarter? Things kind of playing out as you'd expect? And what are we seeing in terms of deposit growth?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#36

It wouldn't be huge on if we didn't [ get into deposits ] for NII.

John McDonald

analyst
#37

You know it's going to lead to an NII question, of course.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#38

You know what's going. So in the grand scheme of things, if you look at the H8 data and look at industry data, we're performing in line with the industry on loans and deposits. And there's interesting stories in that. The other interesting thing is if you think year-over-year, right now, we're running $1.9 trillion and change on deposits. First quarter, second quarter is always a quarter where we have a lot of cones to pay a lot of taxes, and that goes out and then it builds -- starts building back up. And so there's always a seasonal decline. But if you look last year's second quarter to where we are this quarter here, $1.875 trillion or so up to $1.9 trillion and change. So deposit is actually going off the trough. Loans are up like $5 billion on a base of $1.50 trillion. So they're growing a little slower, and that goes back to this question of line usage and stuff going on. So we feel good about where we are. We're growing with the industry. That's -- from our standpoint, that's not good enough, but we are growing in the industry. But the quality of the deposit base and the quality of loan base also, especially when you have the sizable high-end commercial customers in capital markets took away a lot of balances. So the good middle-market, small business growing in the low single digit, mid-single digits type of numbers year-over-year and stuff, that's good stuff. In the commercial -- consumer business, mortgage is not going anywhere. Cards kind of up a chunk and then performing, they come down this quarter and build back up, but that's usual. And the rest -- in autos are kind of in and out, but they're fine at $50-odd billion. So the loan demand is solid but not robust because the borrowing costs went up a lot. But at the end of the day, it seems hold the room and do them well, but that's -- we push for more than the market. Our long-term strategy is to price our deposit base and deliver our execution across all the businesses, the banking deposit base, the wealth management deposit base, consumer deposit base to basically outgrow the economy by 1% or 2% on that. And that then, when you have $1.9 trillion plus of this stuff, that's a big -- you're capitalizing a big amount. We've held on to -- we were $1.75 billion during the pandemic or something like that, we're $1.9 billion and change and $1.9 trillion -- I'm saying billions, trillions on all those accounts, but $1.9 trillion and change. And that means we're 30% bigger and we've held our own, and now it's time to grow again.

John McDonald

analyst
#39

And in terms of kind of the yield-seeking behavior, have we gone through most of that transition, does it feel like?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#40

Yes. I think -- so that's where you have to sort out the customer base very carefully. So we have corporates that are -- as rates have stayed up higher, they've actually continued to fine-tune their movement because the earnings credit rate, which is the rate we give people for the deposit balance in which they pay for services, stays up a little higher so they can lower the balances on that side and put it more in sort of at the market pricing side. Wealth management customers, the same thing. As the rates have stayed a little higher, now the cash allocations are pushing harder into the things. It looks like it's going to stay here for awhile, it was going to go up and come down and they are like sort of tighten up. But in the core consumer base, it's very stable. And so -- and we raised -- some CDs are coming in because people want a little duration. So you see the 4-and-change percent for 7 months and stuff. All that's good stuff because you just move, keeping the cash involved in the system. But the only real pressure is always a high-end consumer, the wealth management customer, in particular, and the higher in corporates because that's their business. And the financial advisers and the private bankers, their business is to optimize for the customer. Interesting fact, which has something to do with balance in the aggregate, but not as much, it goes back to your macro question. If you look at the deposit balances of the customers who are here at the beginning of the pandemic and are still here and look at their balances, the dynamic now is a cue to demonstrate this. For the people -- for the customers of ours that had balances, say, below $10,000 $12,000, $10,000 to $15,000 in their account, they're up still a lot. Where the deposits ran off is in people that had $0.5 million, $1 million in their accounts and $0.25 million because they could tidy up their money, and they did. So they're down 20% from prepandemic. The aggregate number in consumer is up from $700 billion to $900 billion and $700-something billion to $950 billion. But it's a very different thing because the top end went down in the top with people with $25,000 or more is like 75% or 80% of the aggregate balances. So a big chunk of that moved. By the way, it's been dead flat for a while, kind of bouncing around. But going to health of consumer, the large numbers, 80% of the consumers with lower balances, their balances are still up dramatically. They're not going anywhere. And [ that's the side the spent down ] hasn't happened yet, but I'm more worried that they're starting to -- as duration of price increases, it happens. So that's different than the deposit dynamics. But it shows you how that dynamic actually plays out with real customers you can look at across time.

John McDonald

analyst
#41

Yes. So when you put the H8 data together on the loans, how does that affect the net interest income outlook? I think for the second quarter, you were kind of looking at $14 billion or so, down a little bit from the first and then some growth in the back half.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#42

Yes. So the context was we always knew this would be the trough quarter. And as we moved along last year, think about the wild swing in rate cuts, 7 -- it was 4 and 7 and 3. And I think we made the estimate of 3. So if you think about that, this is a trough quarter. We've gone from where this trough is going to be like 13.4%, 13.5% up to 14%. Looks now it's going to be about 1% less than that sort of. And the reason why is that, frankly, the markets business is bigger this quarter. And actually, we can talk about it, is actually having a higher performance in traditional. I usually had a step down in balance sheet because all of your customers out there have done a lot of activity in the first quarter. It stayed higher. That gets paid through the fee line for the prime brokerage business and the market elevation. And then secondly, I think at the highest end, some of the deposit pricing, because the rates structure staying higher, people are tidying up that money that came in from things. And so we feel pretty good at that. What happens then is what we said is this will be the trough and you grow, and the dynamics of that growth are still very strong. And so as you think about the second half of the year, it grows off of there. You think about next year, it comes out as a run rate and just -- it keeps going from there. And that's with modest single-digit -- low single-digit deposit loan growth. It's just really the dynamics of the fixed assets repricing. It's the dynamics of the stabilization, the change of deposit rates. And we feel very good about it. And you think about that in the aggregate, you basically look at years '23 and '24, we ought to exit. But basically the highest level for the 2-year period, not '22 because a record quarter in [ '20 ]. And then you go off from there. And that's what we feel good about. So these estimates are always very fine-tuned about what's going on, but we feel very good because the trough is -- as we look at the trough, the trough ended up higher than we thought, and it came when we saw even though the rate movements moved all around in the last 6 months. And we're building balances, and that's the key.

John McDonald

analyst
#43

So maybe -- I mean still troughing maybe a little bit below the 14%, 13%, higher, something like that and then going up from there.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#44

And then starts moving up. And then there's -- we'll have to see what happens in rates in '26 -- in '25, '26. But based on what the forward curve, we'd see really taking off from there. So year-over-year, '23, '24 sort of bouncing around. But different how we got there down and up, but it kind of ends up flattish and then kicks into high gear from there.

John McDonald

analyst
#45

I think you've talked a little bit about like your net interest margin is kind of around 2% today. Historically, it's been a little higher. Where can you see that normalizing out over the next few years?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#46

I think it normalizes out to 2.30% to 2.40% from where it is now. If you go back and look at different times, and that's kind of what it was in '16, '17 when you got to -- and that would -- that's assuming the economy grows at 2% in the rate structure, the Fed funds rate, 3%, 3.5%, 4%. It's not 0 again because that's where it gets squeezed. But a lot of that comes from the repricing of assets, of which there's offsets, too, because we've got other assets that our interest rate position really hasn't changed in the last 3 years. It's plus or minus 100 basis points. It's around $3 billion-ish. And that's through all these different machinations. So we got to be careful because people look at one piece, well, that's going to go that way and you say, "Well, there's other pieces." But overall, there's no -- with a big markets balance sheet, 2.30%, 2.40% is doable. Is there scenarios in transition you get higher than that? Yes. But I think I'd be careful because remember, the market's balance sheet is now $900 billion of the balance sheet. It used to be $700 billion and it has a naturally less yield to it. It has a profitability to a naturally less balance sheet yield. So that keeps that overall number a little bit more in check.

John McDonald

analyst
#47

Okay. So maybe you could just kind of give us a little update in terms of what you're seeing. You mentioned markets, sales and trading for the quarter and housing shaping up there.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#48

So Jimmy and the team have done a great job. They gained share. We've kind of moved up a notch or 2 over the last 3 or 4 years of market share. If you look at it last year, second quarter this year, second quarter, we should be up low single digits. FICC, flattish and equity is performing better. Going back to why that balance sheet is bigger and up double-digit percent, and you mix the two together. So that's good. And that seems to be what we hear from other people now, what we see as we finish up the last month of the quarter. It will be down linked quarter just because that's the way the markets work, but not down as much as we would have thought. So we feel good, low single digits up and equity is performing well, which is where we had the most ground to gain obviously. And because Jimmy and the team have basically had multiple -- I think, 8 quarters of year-over-year growth looking at last quarter last year. And what he's been able to do is step up to -- for lack of a better -- it's not -- it's a great business, which you take a lot of risk and then to benefit your clients and make some money on it. But on the other hand, it has an annuity stream aspect to it. And you're seeing that sort of -- they drove the cost down and drove the sort of recurring stream up. And that then opens up a profit that sort of holds there, and then you get the active quarters on top of. They've just done a good job doing it.

John McDonald

analyst
#49

Your relative performance has been good and your volatility as well. I think it's been a little more...

Brian Moynihan

executive
#50

We made money every last -- I think we made money every quarter last quarter I think in the last 4 years has been at most, one hand for less of losses trading days, and they've done a good job. So it's a moving business and a service business and a financing business. And now that's one of the reasons why they're elevated. The second quarter is more or less coming in. That's why equities' total revenue from all that activity is up.

John McDonald

analyst
#51

On the IB front, obviously, we're seeing a rebound year-over-year, and you had a big quarter in the first quarter, I think $1.5 billion, $1.6 billion. Maybe just any perspective on how things are shaping up there?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#52

Well, as we look at the fee data which is out there, I think it's, what, 10%, 15% up. We should be right in that 10% to 15%, plus or minus. I think that these things will evolve but towards the end of the quarter will close or not, but up year -- that's year-over-year, quarter-to-quarter. And so we feel pretty good about that. Matthew, again, the team's run, they've kind of fundamentally keep moving up. The good news is when the financing markets are driving it. We have great financing business. And so I think we think it's up 12% -- 10% to 15% from last year. This year maybe at the upper end of that range.

John McDonald

analyst
#53

Okay. And then just kind of rounding things out, you've had a great track record of delivering on positive operating leverage. You gave us the perspective of how much the company has grown and how much the head count has shrunk. How are you managing kind of that dynamic of net interest income is a little tougher to grow this year, obviously, kind of balancing that goal of operating leverage with the longer-term investments you want to make?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#54

Well, and I think if you look at it more longer term, the dynamics -- the inflation that everybody talks about hit Bank of America, and there's little we can do about it. So our employee costs are up 25% or 30% from '19 to '23. Talent teammates get paid more -- not a lot more people, maybe 5,000, 7,000 to 6,000 of which we brought down 4,000 from that. So -- but it's just -- we have -- our attrition rate is half of what it was prepandemic to give you a sense. And that's very good because that stability means you spend a lot less on replacing people and people can buy more expertise. So we feel good about that. And so we -- expenses last quarter, $16.5 billion without the FDIC or something like that. We'll pick up a couple of hundred million because of the FICA and all that stuff. And so we're on this run rate that basically keeps bouncing on that level. When you look at that on an annual basis, that's what we ran the company on 2016 or something like that, '15. So it's across almost a decade, you've had no nominal growth in expenses, even inflation investments. So what do we do? We keep running operational excess and engineering out cost. There's elevated -- as my colleagues would tell you, elevated regulatory costs and things like that. We had to give up revenue streams and overdrafts and other things. And so the team has done a good job there. And so right now, we're saying that we've got the head count settled in. We brought it down 4,000 people, I think, first quarter, first quarter last year this year. We'll hire 2,500-some interns here next week and 2,000 full-time employees. So we're out hiring. We're managing it well. You get it by driving operational excellence and taking out work. And this is where the digitization and AI has helped -- continued, will be helpful more on the second in OREO and then you invest that in the front end. So we've gone from $3 billion probably -ish in '19 and technology investments per year sort of the coding initiatives, as we call it, to $3.8 billion this year. We've gone from -- the branch system has been fine-tuned, but we've invested $3 billion in the branches -- branch architecture over the last 5, 6 years to build these new branches and upgrade the current branches and refit them. And we'll still invest that going forward because what I have said to myself and the team have said to ourselves -- and yes, we cannot let deferred maintenance come in. So you have to keep doing that. So meanwhile, while we're running this thing sort of bouncing around at expense levels of flat and back out once you got the inflation, the intros you're doing it. You're paying more people, you have less of them. You're fine-tuning the management levels. We're down 10,000 managers over the last decade in the company. You use an attrition to be your friend so you don't have to make layoffs. We try not to. We try to take jobs to give opportunity to other teammates, but you're making massive investments in effect of this, you're making massive investments in simplification, and at the same time, you're making massive investments in new stuff, which makes a place less simple. Then you got to simplify it once you get a go. And the team has done a great job here. So we feel good that the expense will come down, the long lines we talked about and then sort of think of bump along here. And then as the NII kicks in, you'll get the operating leverage back as you get to the back half of this year. And then -- and that's -- [ when we had the 20 ], some quarters of it is when NII was -- we could -- even if in a stable rate environment grow loans, deposits and grow NII. But when what's going on, it takes a lot to get underneath it come out the other side.

John McDonald

analyst
#55

Okay. And on credit, you mentioned that credit generally is in a good place for you and the industry. Any diverging trends between commercial and consumer to point out?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#56

So the concern was, are you normalizing and will it stop on the consumer side in terms of delinquencies and charge-offs in that? And so if you look -- and that was going on everywhere. You see the trust data, all the stuff that you guys look at, plus the quarterly reports, and you saw it come up. And what we're seeing is the 5- and 30-day delinquencies have tipped back, flattened out. And so we're pretty comfortable that with our customer base in the cards, which end of the day, the cards drive the whole provision line now because of just the dynamics of it. So it's -- 2/3 of the quarterly provision is card charge-offs and -- because you're paying as you go even though you have this 6%, 7% reserve level. And so we feel good about that because you've seen that tip in. So the latter stages of the moving back up or bubbling through, and so that ought to stabilize. And then if you look at auto, you had some county changes and stuff like that, that's all through the system. And used car prices have stabilized. They went up massively, so nobody is losing money on a repo. And we don't have many repos, but that impacts it. And if you look at the commercial side, general commercial credit, very good. We have great ratings integrity company. Bruce Thompson leads this area for us across all the businesses. He's been at this a long time, so we feel very good about that. Then real estate, you're seeing it went up and it started to tip down. And that's -- we're pretty aggressive in rerating, and that causes reappraisals and that causes at the current market, reappraisals. And so even you see after reappraisal, the charge-off we're taking. As you watch the dispositions, we feel very good about where we have the things marked to. If anything gets rated at a certain level and down, it has to go through that process. And then we apply to the rest of the company for reserves, the rest of the portfolio. But we have a modest portfolio in office. And so it's -- but it's really just getting through this a little bit dimension. But we feel good about credit overall, including commercial real estate credit, obviously. And we're seeing capital come back in, and we're trying to help the customers have capital to do some interesting things now.

John McDonald

analyst
#57

Yes. So well reserved on the CRE side, nothing much on the C&I side and consumer kind of start to see the signs of that.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#58

And you add that all up at 50 basis points or whatever it is, it's basic of what it was in '19, which -- '19 was at 42 or something, I think 40-ish basis points. That was a 50-year low. And so if you sort of look at it, it's normalized to a level. Now -- so we feel very good about it. Now believe me, there's a lot of intensity in our company and outside our company, into our company and every other bank right now about credit quality, I think, because that's between the banking relators and stuff. And so we're beating this c***. We feel very good about it. But that's many years of responsible growth. And you can see the stress test comparisons and the things that you see, we built the portfolio this way so that we could be able to be there as a source of strength when other people may be shaken.

John McDonald

analyst
#59

Right, right. That's a good point. It's normalized, but too historically very strong level.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#60

It's -- and I remember not to -- somewhere in '19 when we hit like 30-odd basis points or something for a quarter. I said to Mick Ankrom, who you know, I said, "Mick, go find it." And I could hear him in the background pulling old annual reports off the shelf because you couldn't get electronic data going back far enough to find that kind of charge of freight, that low of a charge of freight. And by the way, you have a lot of big card book, some of those years. So we feel good about it. But underlying consumer delinquency stuff, they're basically stable -- stabilizing and tip back down. And that was the key to say this is normalizing that trend, and you saw that. But quite frankly, 4% unemployment rate, 3.9% or whatever it is, you shouldn't expect this. And if you look at the way we set our reserves, I think we're still 7% to high 4s or 5% unemployment rate this year. So there's a fair conservatism build there.

John McDonald

analyst
#61

Okay. So just on capital then, just under 12% CET1. You've got a healthy excess on your current rules. You've got enough to absorb even the harshest version of Basel III on capital. What are you looking for in terms of more clarity to ramp up some of the distributions? You've done some buybacks. I think it was $2.5 billion last quarter. But it just feels like you're in a good capital position, you have excess. Do you need more clarity? Or can you start ramping up a bit here?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#62

No. We'll push a little harder. But we need to -- you never want to do a bunch and then have to wait and put it back on. So you want to have more of an even plan. And so we think the stock's the place that we should be buying, it's -- we think of this not as a price determination, more as I got capital. I want the organic growth, and we will put all the capital to organic growth because everything we do hurdles and all the happy stuff, so we drive that. That usage is not that dramatic, honestly, except when we move markets up by chunk. And we absorb that to run at a level, and it will move up incrementally, but we moved them.

John McDonald

analyst
#63

You already made that move.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#64

$200 billion, that moved up a lot on the G-SIB calculation stuff. So it will have to -- stock price being up blows us through a G-SIB. We'll have to deal with that, but that's 50 basis points, and we'll deal with it. But we'll let markets run up a little higher to use it, utilize it. And the new rules might have more gradation to it, but that's not the rule. So we feel good about that. So organic growth then basically pay the dividend, which is a $2 billion carry a quarter to -- at the current nominal levels and then use the rest of them get back to the shareholders. And so that dynamic was going on as we move through sort of the normalization earnings and all the c*** behind us in '17, '18, '19, '20. Then the pandemic hits, and we all have to freeze to figure out where this goes. And then the '21 CCAR hit and everybody was like, "What the heck happened here. Got by that." And then -- so it's been sort of things, but we've been buying through that. And now you sort of look at it and say, what could go -- you got CCAR. We've got to get the answer on that. It shouldn't be any different than past years, frankly, but we'll see. And then you got the new rules, which at $195 billion, $197 billion of TCE1 (sic) [ CET1 ], we have -- the calculation we make is our RWA go under advance, we go from $1.6 trillion and change up to $1.9 trillion and change. And that -- the 10% of $1.9 trillion, and that's $190 billion. So we're sitting with a capital. If that goes anywhere less than that, then we have a lot more excess capital. And we'll just push up the buyback a bit after that. Those are two clarity points. And you read everything and you talk to people, too. They're trying to figure out a way to make this makes more sense. And when they do, we'll get on with it. But at this point, we feel very good about the capital base of the company and how we got there, too, which has just been organic retention of capital while we're buying back stock. And common equity continues to grow, and -- but we don't really need it in that -- in the sense that you and I are talking, yes.

John McDonald

analyst
#65

Yes. So you talked about you wrapped it all together, you talked about being a quality compounder, compounding tangible book value growth? And do you think a mid-teens ROTCE is the right target for the company?

Brian Moynihan

executive
#66

Yes. We're sitting at that and we should pick up -- the NII flows to the bottom line pretty quickly. And so the fees have more attachment to it. And that's one of the pressure on expense. It has nothing to do with anything you don't want it to have something to do, which was wealth management revenues were up and markets revenues up and investment banking revenues up. Those attach more quickly to expense lines. But NII is there. So we think mid-teens ROTCE efficiency ratio moving down from where it is as NII picks up and operating leverage in that dynamic. But never forget, we have to invest heavily in our brand. We have to invest heavily in our physical plant. We have to invest heavily in our head count, increases on the client coverage side where we're taking it out. And we look at the 100 markets we have and say, "Do we have enough small business bankers in Savannah, Georgia to hit the market and move to the market share?" And we do a pair-wise comparison of all our markets. What's our market share by every business unit and say, "Why can't we be in that market? Where we are in that market looks like them," and that's usually personnel and adding more talent. So we manage that out. Those -- that were 5,000 people over 5 years would be a lot. So it's modest as long as I'm getting that efficiency out of the back end. So that gets you the ROTCE in the mid-single digits, and the efficiency ratio keeps working now and the leverage comes.

John McDonald

analyst
#67

Great. It's great summary. Thanks, Brian.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#68

Thanks. Thank you.

John McDonald

analyst
#69

Appreciate it.

Brian Moynihan

executive
#70

Thanks.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Bank of America Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Bank of America Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.