Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us, and welcome to the Belite Bio Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. I will now hand the conference over to Julie Fallon. Please go ahead.

Thank you for joining us. On the call today are Dr. Tom Lin, Chairman and CEO of Belite Bio; Dr. Hendrik Scholl, Chief Medical Officer; Dr. Nathan Mata, Chief Scientific Officer; and Hao-Yuan Chuang, Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, let me point out that we will be making forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations and beliefs. These statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. We encourage you to consult the risk factors discussed in our SEC filings for additional detail. Additionally, today, we will be discussing certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided in the press release we issued today. And now I'll turn the call over to Dr. Lin. Dr. Lin?

Thank you, Julie. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining our second quarter 2026 Financial Results and Corporate Update Call. The first half of this year has been both exciting and deeply productive for Belite Bio. As we rapidly approach a potential regulatory approval of Tinlarebant for Stargardt disease in the U.S. We are very pleased to announce that the FDA has accepted our new drug application for Tinlarebant with priority review and establishing a PDUFA date of February 12, 2027. We believe this reflects the strength, consistency and depth of clinical data generated across our development program. In parallel with our pre-commercial preparations, we remain highly engaged with the medical and patient communities. The enthusiasm we are seeing underscores the profound need for a new treatment paradigm in Stargardt disease. This quarter, we presented our Phase III DRAGON study results at 4 medical conferences across 4 countries, including the recent American Society of Retina Specialists, ASRS, Annual Meeting. At ASRS, we presented new secondary endpoint data, demonstrating subjects treated with Tinlarebant showed a hold to slightly decrease qAF values decreased by approximately 2% at month 25 compared to baseline. In contrast, subjects in the placebo group exhibited an approximately 20% increase in qAF values over the same period. Quantitative autofluorescence or qAF is a marker of toxic bisretinoid accumulation, a key driver of retinal degeneration in Stargardt disease. The prevention or reduction of qAF strongly aligns with Tinlarebant mechanism of action, reinforcing its potential to hold or slow lesion growth. Looking ahead, we remain confident in our data, our science and the transformative potential of Tinlarebant for patients living with Stargardt disease. We look forward to providing further updates as they become available. I'll now turn the presentation over to Hao-Yuan to discuss the financials. Hao?

Thank you, Tom. We have had a strong first half of the year and continue to execute well against our plan. Let me recap our financial statements. For the second quarter of 2026, Our R&D expenses were $18.2 million compared to $11 million for the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to a royalty payment for additional milestone achieved under the license agreement. On a non-GAAP basis, excluding share-based compensation expenses, R&D expenses for second quarter were $17.2 million compared to $8.6 million in the second quarter of 2025. SG&A expenses in Q2 was $16.7 million compared to $6.5 million for the same period in 2025. The increase was primarily due to increase in professional service fee, wages and salary resulting from our team expansions. On a non-GAAP basis, SG&A expenses for the second quarter were $10.9 million compared to $1.3 million in 2025 second quarter. The GAAP net loss in the second quarter was $28.4 million compared to $16.3 million in the same quarter in 2025. On a non-GAAP basis, we reported a net loss of $21.6 million for the second quarter compared to $8.7 million in 2025 same quarter. We ended the quarter with $780 million in cash, cash equivalents and U.S. treasury bills. Overall, our balance sheet remains very strong, and we are extremely well funded into the future with a cash runway to commercialize Tinlarebant following a potential regulatory approval and to continue to advance our pipelines. With that, I'll now turn the call back to the operator for Q&A. Operator?

[Operator Instructions]. First question comes from the line of Judah Frommer with Morgan Stanley.

Congrats on the progress. A couple from us. I guess with the NDA accepted now, what are your thoughts on the role that DRAGON II can play for the U.S. filing and/or regulatory process, any incremental interaction with FDA that would shed light on what that trial could be potentially utilized for in the U.S? And then, latest thinking on going lower in age going into peds for Tinlarebant , do you have trial plans to move the label below 12 years old in the near term?

Thanks. Good questions. For the DRAGON 2, I think at this stage, it's still pretty much a Japan study for the PMDA. Right now, we don't think -- we don't believe that the DRAGON II will contribute to the NDA process. As for the pediatric study, we do have plans, and I'll let Hendrik shed more light on the details of that study.

Yes, happy to. Thank you, Tom. So we are initiating a PIP study, a pediatric study in London, where we will investigate Tinlarebant in patients of BH3311 and this will be the basis to inform regulatory processes for patients that are younger than 12 years old.

And your next question Marc Goodman with Leerink.

Could you tell us how much the royalty payment was, the one-timer that's within R&D? Second question, just tell us what you're thinking with respect to European filing? And then third, have you done any claims database analysis to figure out like exactly the number of patients that are in the United States that have actually under the claims database?

Hao, do you want to take this, given that it's the royalty payment?

Yes. Well, the first one is related to the completion of the Phase III study. And I can also take the third question. We will -- as we said on the press release, we do plan to host a Commercial Day event, it's going to be virtual in September, and we'll disclose about the numbers that we have surveyed about the question you just asked.

How much was the royalty payment?

No, we cannot disclose that, Columbia asked us to keep that as a confidential, but yes, it's related to the Phase III completion.

Okay. And then just thoughts on European filing?

Okay. So I can take that. So right now, we are focused on the FDA with the PDUFA date in February 12. So that's our top priority, we'll be highly focused in the next 6 months on getting the drug approved. So the European filing will probably be sometime after the FDA approval, we want to align everything with the FDA, the approval and all that, and there will be the consistent message and communications with the regulatory authorities outside of the U.S. given what we discussed with the FDA and the approval and then there will be our strategy for ongoing regulatory filings.

And your next question comes from Tazeen Ahmad with Bank of America.

In terms of manufacturing, have you stated where your manufacturing site is and whether or not that facility has completed an FDA inspection recently? Or is that going to be part of the requirement to get approval? And then secondly, I just wanted to get your latest thoughts on the possibility of an AdCom just given the consolidated time that the FDA would have to review, when do you think is the latest realistically that you would be told if the agency decided to hold on.

There's a few questions there. So I'll answer the first one, and I probably have to get you to repeat the last 2, 3 questions. So the first one, we do have a CDMO in the U.S. These are all the -- we're not at the privileged to review right now the names of the CDMOs, but these are all big names in the field -- in the industry. So we have ex U.S. and then a U.S.-based CDMO for that. So I hope that answers your question. What's the second and third question?

It was more about the FDA. And given a consolidated time line for review, what is your thought about having an AdCom as the agency talked about that. And realistically, when is the latest they could tell you if they were going to give you an AdCom?

So right now, we don't believe there has AdCom been planned, but that doesn't mean that further down the line, the FDA would want to use AdCom, so nothing on that right now. So I would say that once we have more updates further down the line, then we'll probably review that -- update that at a more appropriate time. But at this stage, we just received the acceptance, so we don't have any further details on that.

And your next question comes from the line of Steve Seedhouse with Cantor.