BioInvent International AB (publ) (BINV) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
October 26, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Martin Welschof
executiveThank you very much, and welcome, everybody, to our call today. It's the interim report January to September 2023. And -- and I am Martin Welschof, the CEO, and I will start the presentation, and later, the second part of the presentation will be covered by Stefan Ericsson, our CFO. So I would start with a quick summary of the interim report. So briefly go over the events in the third quarter. So we had the first patient recruited into our Phase [ IIa] trial of single-agent BI-1808 for the treatment of advanced malignancies, and that was a very important milestone for the company, and I will come back to that later in a little bit more detail. Then we also initiated the subcutaneous arm of our Phase I/II clinical trial for solid tumors for BI-1206 in combination with pembrolizumab. Then on the collaboration side, as you probably will remember, we're quite active on that as well. So we signed an agreement with Exelixis and actually achieved the first research milestone, which was triggering a USD 1 million milestone payment, which, of course, is not super significant, but I think it's a good sign for the activity that we have in that collaboration. Then we're really looking forward to 2 poster presentations to be held at SITC in November this year. The first one will be on the single-agent Phase I data for BI-1808, which is our lead candidate targeted receptor 2. And then we'll have also some preclinical data sets on BI-1910, which is a second candidate. So 1808, just to remind you, is blocking deleting antibody while 1910 is an agonistic antibody. Then also will present our dose escalation part of the BI-1607, which is our second anti-Fc gamma receptor IIB antibody that has been completed without any safety concerns and the first clinical data set from that will be presented on the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in December. Then there was one event after the end of the period, which was also an important milestone. So you remember our anti-CTLA-4, BT-001, compound clinical development that we run in collaboration with Transgene. It's a 50-50 joint venture. And there, we announced that the first patients have been treated now in the Part B of the Phase I study, where we combine it with Keytruda. So just to remind you that we have a portfolio strategy, I'll just show that slide again. So you see that we have a quite interesting portfolio, currently 5 clinical programs running. And we are focusing more or less on 3 targets. So we have our platforms around Fc gamma receptor IIB and TNF receptor 2. And you see that on both platforms, we have different assets for Fc gamma receptor IIB, we've our lead 1206, currently in 2 clinical trials, but then we also have a second anti-Fc gamma receptor IIB antibody, which is 1607. And that's the data set that will come out later this year. Then on our TNF receptor 2 platform, which is actually quite interesting targets. And when we started, we were almost alone, now Novartis is working on TNF receptor 2 program, BeiGene and then a couple of other companies. But we are still in the lead, and we feel probably one year ahead of the competition and a leading antibody, there's 1808 that we're currently testing as a single agent as well as in combination with pembrolizumab. And then I mentioned 1910. This is an agonist antibodies. And both antibodies will be covered [ at SITC ] 1808 as a single agent and 1910 preclinical data. And we hopefully then also will initiate the clinical development around 1910 soon. And then I mentioned already, there's BT-001, now in combination with pembrolizumab. And this is based on our proprietary anti-CTLA4 antibody, which is nicely differentiated from ipilimumab and we run it in combination with the Oncologic biospectrum of Transgene and that has also moved now into the combination of -- with pembro. What I will do now in the next slides is basically go program by program to give you a little bit of highlights of the update and where we are at the moment. So starting then with 1206 in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in combination with rituximab. So as you will remember, we are currently developing a subcutaneous formulation as well as an IV and the recruitment for the subcutaneous as well as for the IV is still ongoing. And regarding the subcu, I can say that we have reached now 150 milligrams safely, and we are collecting further data and we want to have a significant data set not just the plus 5 normal patient that you would like to show or we would like to have. That's why we've decided to run it a little bit longer before we disclose the data, which will be the first half of next year. Just to remind you, the data from the IV dose escalation interim results were quite strong. So we had 4 complete responses, 3 partial responses and 4 cases of stable disease. And I think the update here is really that the complete responses are still lasting. So as of June, the median duration of the complete response was 2.5 years with 3 patients ongoing. The fourth patient, we basically lost -- not lost to disease, but we lost him or her because they are not reporting back anymore. But those ones that we're still connected with, we see that the complete response is still long lasting, which is quite remarkable. So the next steps here will be the first Phase I results from the subcu, which is now scheduled for the first half of 2024. Switching then to 1206 in combination with pembrolizumab. So this is still at earlier stages, still in dose escalation. But also here, we have started now the combination with the subcu, and the first patient was recruited in subcutaneous arm of the study in September. We have actually quite some positive interim results. So we saw early signs of efficacy. So we have 2 long-lasting partial responses and 2 patients with a stable disease out of a total of 18 evaluable patients. And I think what is important to remind everybody is that both patients have seen at least 2, sometimes 3 lines of either anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L-1 containing regimens and do not respond anymore. So it's a big deal that we see responses. And both responding patients have melanoma and both have been previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, as I already mentioned. So the next steps here will be that we extend the efficacy signal in the key indications melanoma and then determine the dose for the Part 2. Now moving then to our second anti-Fc gamma receptor IIB antibody, which is BI-1607, which is running currently in combination with trastuzumab for HER plus solid cancer indications. So the dose escalation part of the study has been completed without any safety concerns. We saw the PK profile are as predicted, had adequate exposure and full receptor occupancy during the full treatment interval, and the exploratory work at intermediate dose level is now being conducted to determine the best dose to move forward in subsequent studies. The data set will be presented, as you can see on the right-hand side on the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in Texas in December. So this is quite interesting. And then moving to TNF receptor 2. And as I already mentioned on my introductory part, TNF receptor 2 is a very interesting target, and that might be another checkpoint. And then obviously, 1808 would be another checkpoint inhibitor. When we started that study, we're quite -- there was only one other group in Boston, academic group that then turned into a company. And we actually found TNF receptor 2 upregulated on material from ovarian cancer patients, and it was upregulated only the tumor marker environment, but not systemically. So that was quite interesting. And as you know, 1808 is ongoing the development since quite a while. And we have finished now the Phase I part, the dose escalation part for 1808 single agent. And we actually moved now into the Phase IIa part, which we did in September when we recruited the first patients. The dose escalation for 1808 in combination with pembro is also ongoing since September 2022 and that data set will be available in the first half of next year. We reported already strong interim safety, and we saw first signs of efficacy, but stable disease observed in 6 patients during the single aged dose escalation parts. And in the Phase IIa single seeking expansion cohorts, we plan to include lung cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma and T-cell lymphoma. So it actually will be quite broad because our goal is really here to establish a single-agent activity. So what is next is then the single agent data that will be presented at SITC. And obviously, we had a press release on the data set already, but there's some additional data that we want to highlight at SITC, and we're really looking forward to that. And in addition, we will also have the 1910 preclinical data, and that's the next candidate that hopefully wouldn't go into clinical development by the end of this year. So since it is coming up soon, so on November 3, and that's something to mark in the calendar. Then BT-001, now in combination with pembrolizumab start in October 2023. We announced -- we and Transgene announced the first patient dose in the Phase I Part B where we then evaluate and analyze BT-001 in combination with Keytruda. We have positive clinical monotherapy interim results, so very good safety data. We saw stabilization of injected lesions in 11 out of 18 patients and saw objective antitumor activity, which is defined as the decrease of injected lesion size of 50% or more. So that was quite promising. And of course, now we're moving into the combination to see how it will look there. So the next step will be then that we include the last station in the Part B of the Phase I study evaluating the combination of BT-001 and Keytruda and that should happen during the first half of next year. That's, I think, the quick summary that I wanted to provide. And now I would like to hand over to Stefan in order to cover the financial overview January through September 2023. Thank you.
Stefan Ericsson
executiveI will present the financial overview for Q3 and the 9-month period, January to September. All amounts are in SEK million unless otherwise mentioned. Net sales were SEK 26.8 million in Q3 2023 compared to SEK 17.9 million in Q3 2022. That's SEK 9 million higher in Q3 2023. The increase is related to the $1 million milestone that we received from Exelixis when we reached a milestone, research milestone. Production of antibodies for customers was SEK 6 million lower in Q3 2023 and research funding as we made in higher in Q3 2023. Net sales for January to September 2023 were SEK 56.1 million for the same period in 2022. Net sales were SEK 305.5 million. That's a decrease of SEK 249 million. The decrease is related to that we, in 2022, received an upfront payment of $25 million, corresponding to SEK 256 million when we signed an agreement with Exelixis. In 2022, we also received EUR 0.5 million milestone from Bayer. The decrease is also related to that revenue for production of antibodies for customers was SEK 21 million lower in 2023. Positive deviations in 2023 were that research funding was SEK 22 million higher and that we, in 2023, received a $1 million milestone for Exelixis. Operating costs increased from SEK 87.1 million in Q3 2022 to SEK 108.1 million in Q3 2023. That's an increase of SEK 21 million. We had quite higher costs in BI-1607 and BI-1808 and somewhat higher cost in BI-1206. And we had higher personnel costs in Q3 2023. For January to September, the increase of operating cost was SEK 38 million from SEK 277 million to SEK 315 million in 2023. During the period, we had quite higher costs in BI-1206 and BI-1808. We also had somewhat higher costs in BI-1910. We had quite lower cost for production of antibodies for customers and somewhat lower costs in BI-1607. And personnel costs in 2023 were quite higher compared to 2022. The loss for Q3 2023 was minus SEK 71.1 million, and we had a loss for January to September 2023 of minus SEK 233.1 million. Share issue completed in January 2023 amounted to SEK 31.3 million. Funds, current and long-term investments end of September amounted to a total of SEK 1.358 billion.
Martin Welschof
executiveThank you, Stefan. I think that covers the financial part, and I will briefly go over the key catalysts for the remainder of the year. We have just listed the milestones that we view in -- during the second half of this year. And the ones that we already have taken -- I mentioned, but I maybe summarize it again very briefly. So we started our subcu for BI-1206 in combination with Keytruda. And then also, we started our BI-1808, the Phase IIa Part A as a single agent, as I just mentioned. And then we also kicked off the combination study with Keytruda for BT-001. Then what is outstanding for the [indiscernible] is the BI-1808 single-engine data, the data that will be published or presented at SITC, which is coming up in November, 1607, the Phase I data -- dose escalation data sets at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium and then last but not least, to kick off with our clinical trial #6, which is BI-1910, our second TNF receptor 2 antibody. Yes. So this is the end of the presentation. And now we're happy to take questions.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Richard Ramanius from Redeye.
Richard Ramanius
analystI have 3 questions. Start with the accelerated approval pathways. You've previously talked about going to the market more quickly with both BI-1206 and 1808 in smaller niche indications. Is this still the plan? And when do you think there could be on the market, I mean, for both products?
Martin Welschof
executiveShall I directly answer that. So this is still an option, Richard, for BI-1206 in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. As you remember, we have orphan designation for follicular lymphoma as well as for mantle cell lymphoma. And then the option for 1808 is still viable for CTCL, the rare T cell lymphoma. However, and of course, we have done some planning internally, but I think I would not present those numbers here today. And also, I think what is the however? The however, is that the regulatory landscape has changed. in that sense that you do have to do much more dose finding. So project Optimus. That's obviously the main reason for it. And then the -- especially around 1808, we have chosen in order really to demonstrate [ single-agent ] to not go after 1 dose expansion cohort, but rather [ 4 ] at least, and then just repeat them, it's ovarian, lung cancer, it's CTCL and it's melanoma because I think it's at the stage where we're in, it's much more important to show broad application potential rather than really focus already now on 1 area. And the idea behind that is really to show single-agent activity. That's why we did it.
Richard Ramanius
analystOkay. So your -- let's say, in short words, you're looking at effect in broader indications, which is interesting for partners.
Martin Welschof
executiveExactly. Exactly. Exactly.
Richard Ramanius
analystYes. My second question was how is the collaboration going with CASI? They will start in solid cancers as well, is that correct?
Martin Welschof
executiveSo with CASI, first of all, the collaboration is going very well. Obviously, it was hampered by the period when China was on a complete lockdown during the pandemic -- COVID pandemic. But that has changed now, and I think they are picking up nicely. And obviously, I can't speak for them because they have to decide when they want to get out with data. But they're very important and integral part of our global overall development strategy for BI-1206, and they are currently focusing on non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and liquid cancers. Obviously, they have the right to be 12 or 6 for China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan for all applications, but the current focus is clearly on liquid cancers. And I cannot speak for them, once they want to [indiscernible] indication, but currently they are focused on liquid cancers.
Richard Ramanius
analystOkay. And I had a financial question with your large cash position and interest increasing the American rates depending on the term -- short-term rates are above 5% now. So my question is how much your cash position is in foreign currencies? How much in dollars? And how much interest do you -- on this cash position?
Stefan Ericsson
executiveAs you say, you can get up to -- we place money up to 2 years, and you can get up to 5% currently. And you hold some cash at a lower -- you try to place this as safe as possible, of course, to not taking a risk to this. And we don't -- we have -- when it comes to our holding of currency risks, we try all the time to eliminate cash flow -- currency risk with inflow and outflow of cash in the different currencies.
Richard Ramanius
analystOkay. Those were my questions.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Dan Akschuti from Pareto Securities.
Dan Akschuti
analystFirst one would be just if you could elaborate a bit how the partnership with Exelixis is growing. And as we can see, revenues from the partnerships, are these increasing now? What's your expectation for Q4?
Martin Welschof
executiveSo I'm trying to be -- you're a little bit muffled then just as you know that, but I think I got what you were asking. So the Exelixis collaboration is going well, as you can see, because we already achieved one milestone, which was rather quick. We don't -- it's potentially a broader collaboration. But since it's very early stage discovery, we don't give any guidance because it won't go anywhere. I think we're already happy that they have selected the lead and there's potential for more. But I think -- keep in mind that this is a very early stage discovery collaboration. We got already SEK 25 million upfront. Now we got another SEK 1 million. We have full FTE coverage. So I think for us, it's a very nice deal. In that sense that we also work on assets in case they should not pick them that we can use ourselves or partner it otherwise. So I think it's -- in that sense, it's a very interesting collaboration, but we can't provide any guidance since it's so early because that's -- everything can happen at that stage. But it's going well in all in all. I think that was the first part. And the second part, I -- maybe you can repeat that. That was a more financial question, I believe.
Dan Akschuti
analystYes. So if you have any expectations in terms of like milestone payments from any partner for Q4?
Martin Welschof
executiveYes. So the only thing what we can say because we also cannot provide any guidance regarding this, but you know that we have, I think, 6 programs currently running with various companies, Daiichi, Mitsubishi, Takeda, Bayer, which are at Phase I or Phase II, and they're all structured in the same way. So there was an upfront and then there are clinical milestone payments, commercial milestone payments and then tier royalties at the end. And I think this year, we also got from Bayer. Stefan. I mean just looking at you, right? That was a milestone from...
Stefan Ericsson
executiveThat was last year.
Martin Welschof
executiveIt was last year. Okay. So it's very difficult to forecast since we don't run it by ourselves, but it could be quite interesting, especially that the Takeda program, I think it's, from my perspective, one of the more interesting ones since I try this asset in multiple clinical studies, but we can't give any forecast because they're on their pace and based on their strategy.
Dan Akschuti
analystOkay. And the last question would be on -- you mentioned Novartis and Daiichi are also going after TNF receptor 2, and you're now the first company that has already reported some data. And if you could maybe elaborate a bit what we could expect now in this readout, so there will be some new data as I understood or...
Martin Welschof
executiveYes, yes. There will be some new data because -- and of course, I have to do this carefully since it's not released yet, so it will be published at SITC. And it's more kind of related to the fact, maybe you get it from Bayer, not so much that we have much more patient, but what has happened with the patients that have been treated. Keep in mind that they are all late-stage solid cancer patients. In some cases, we have patients that have received 12 different regiments of treatment, all kind of stuff. So that means once you see a stable disease until they develop into something more, it takes some time. So it's more kind of this type of data that you should expect.
Dan Akschuti
analystOkay. And just a last detail on that. The abstract [indiscernible] are released on the 31st of October, will that be released then? Or will it be released during the conference?
Martin Welschof
executiveSo November 3, it will be released.
Operator
operatorThere are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions and closing comments.
Martin Welschof
executiveI think then we can take some questions that I see here that has been sent into the system. And maybe I read it such that everybody gets what has been asked. So question number one, what can you learn from Ultimovacs? You mean [indiscernible] Ultimovacs has 3.5% market cap versus our 1.5%. So I think there's a big difference between Ultimovacs and BioInvent. Ultimovacs is in later stages of clinical development. And when you look at the current market sentiment, that's much more rewarded. I saw most recently a graph from Centerview looking at immuno-oncology company that are preclinical or early clinical and they suffer all the faces. A lot of them are trading below their money -- below the money that they have. And that's not only Europe, it's also in the U.S. -- more pronounced in the U.S. And Ultimovacs obviously, is a company that is in later stage clinical development. And when you also look at corporate at the moment, that's where everybody focuses. So that will change, and we feel that we have data coming already at the end of this year and then probably even more pronounced during the second half of next year, where we have more late stage, more dose expansion data. And then I think more [ mature ] data, that sentiment should change. Then the other question from the same person, which is [ Bob Bradway ], by the way. Your deal with Exelixis was unexpected, but great use. Can we expect similar stage deals going forward? Yes, we always have done so, but we have to be also careful because even though we got a nice upfront and we have FTE coverage, it also takes people that we normally can for our personnel for internal programs. I think our current thinking is more or less to run one such a collaboration at a time. And of course, there's always a natural end because at some time point, candidates will go over to the company that has -- to Exelixis basically and then we don't have to do anything with that anymore. So once they go into clinical development stage, then we are out and then we would have, again, resources to do other such collaborations. But we are open to it, but not too many at the same time because the main focus will be still on our own portfolio. And then the last question from Bob was a huge deal in the sector a few days ago, Merck versus Daiichi. This is, of course, in ADCs, antibody conjugates drugs. We don't have any ADCs at the moment. So we're working with naked antibodies, both have advantages and disadvantages. At the moment, those are kind of in the focus, the new kid on the block, so to speak. My view is they have the applications as anything else as well. But you can, in any case, think about talking about our current portfolio, if we are lucky and we can really, for instance, present single-agent data around 1808, I think we can expect similar deals. So I think we can do such deals as well. But we don't to make it very clear, we don't have ADCs. This is something that we don't do. We don't -- only do naked antibodies at the moment. So I think just scrolling down here to see whether there are any further questions, but no, there aren't any. So I think we have made good progress. We have a good runway, as Stefan was saying, so through 2025 into early 2026, depending on current planning, things can always change so that we can really work through our portfolio and tick value inflection milestones. And as I said, for the first one, where we feel that we have some excitement is the SITC around 1808. And then going forward, then obviously, more [ maturity ] during the second half of next year. And I'm quite happy with the development that we've seen throughout the portfolio, and I think we are very well positioned to achieve interesting milestones, as I already mentioned throughout my presentation. So I'm just looking at Stefan, do you have any final comments?
Stefan Ericsson
executiveNo.
Martin Welschof
executiveNo. So then I thank everybody for the participation and looking forward to present again at our next -- not the next quarterly, but we always do it in half year...
Stefan Ericsson
executiveIn February.
Martin Welschof
executiveIn February. Yes, exactly. Thank you very much.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete BioInvent International AB (publ) transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to BioInvent International AB (publ) earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.