BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2026

NASDAQ US Health Care Biotechnology conference_presentation 32 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Derek Archila

analyst
#1

Okay. Well, good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us here after the 1 session get right back into the fireside discussions. So my name is Derek Archila. I'm one of the biotech analysts here at Wells Fargo. Really excited to have next here BridgeBio. From the company we have Chinmay Shukla, Chief Business Officer, congratulations on that. As well as Anna Wade, CEO of the Neuromuscular division. So thank you guys for joining us.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#2

Derek, thank you for hosting us, and thanks to the investors for joining us. We are excited to speak to you today and excited for all our conversations.

Derek Archila

analyst
#3

Excellent. Well, Chinmay, maybe just to kind of level set us with the business and where you guys are. We've got a pretty solid growing base business with Attruby, A couple -- 3 launches upcoming. So maybe just give us a state of the business before we dig in.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#4

Yes. It's a great question. So state of the business today is, if you look at our post Phase III drugs, right, that's in ADH1, [ Limbgardl, ] ATTR-CM, obviously, and achondroplasia. We have $8 billion of derisked peak year sales potential. Total, if you look in the entire pipeline, we have $10 billion of risk-adjusted sales potential. So we feel great about that. I think if you look at Attruby second quarter global revenues were annualizing to over $1 billion. U.S. revenues were $222 million. We've been growing very nicely at about $30 million -- $25 million to $30 million quarter-over-quarter. We expect to keep growing at that $25 million to $30 million quarter-over-quarter cadence for Attruby. I think all the clinical updates on Attruby have been extremely positive. We can get into that more. And so that gives me a lot of confidence that in '27 as we launch these next 3 drugs, that's going to add a lot of growth. And then eventually, second half '27 once these clinical messages take hold in the community, Attruby is also going to start to accelerate. So we feel very good about where we are. And the last thing which I'll say, which is important in the long-term perspective of the business is for us, as we start to have all these revenues and generate cash flow we think about where can we invest it. And if you look at the genetic disease landscape, innovation has never been higher, unmet need has never been higher. And so yes, of course, we have to grow into all of that, and we have to do in the right way. But we feel like we have the opportunity to help a lot of patients and that, I think, will accrue to the benefit of our shareholders.

Derek Archila

analyst
#5

Excellent. Well, maybe let's start with Attruby. You provided some good context there in terms of growth and things. But we just came back from ESC, we had kind of the cardio transform data and all that stuff. So I guess what's your view in terms of how the market continues to evolve and the role of stabilizers?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#6

Yes. So there's been a lot of clinical updates in the TTR space. And so let me sort of summarize where I think we are at right now and where we see this market growing. So first of all, stabilizers post cardio transform, it's very clear that today as well as in the future, almost all new frontline ATTR-CM patients will start on a stabilizer. Today, that number is north of 80%. I don't think that, that's going to change given what we saw in cardio transform. I also think that combination therapy is not really effective and it's not going to be a big part of this market going forward. And so that's the second thing which we learned. The third thing which we learned is the 2 knockdowns are very similar to each other, and that obviously feeds into why stabilizers our frontline. But if you look at the placebo-adjusted knockdowns, they're the same, if you look at the hazard ratio on monotherapy, they're the same. And then the last thing, which I think ESC told us, which I think is a little lost sometimes from investors is there is meaningful room to help beyond Vyndamax. And so obviously, today, a ton of patients, majority of frontline patients start on Vyndamax, which makes sense given it's the established product. But we think Attruby as the next-gen second-generation differentiated stabilizer will take more and more share and more patients will start on that drug because simply put, it's a better drug. And so I think that we feel very good about where we are, whether it's because if you look at subpopulations like AFib variant, whether you look at unique kidney protective effects of Attruby. And now what you're starting to see, which is really interesting, is real-world evidence start to come to the front, right? And so you've had 1 publication. We've heard talks about there being more independent real-world studies, which are coming out. So we have to see what happens at HFSA and AHA. But I think all of that will mean that stabilizers will continue to be the frontline therapy of choice. And then over time, we do expect Attruby to keep taking more and more share and become the preferred stabilizer.

Derek Archila

analyst
#7

So what -- you talked about some of these data sets that are coming, whether they're yours or externally, like what other evidence do you want to generate between now and maybe the tafamidis patent expiry to really drive home what you're talking about in terms of that differentiation.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#8

Yes. So all of our work on this front stems from what physicians tell us is most convincing to them. And what we have learned is, number one, subgroup data, right? So that's why this AFIB data really drove -- AFIB and variant subgroup data, which showed that Attruby confers a very large benefit amongst the AFIB population and has the highest point estimate in the variance of population. Actually, it has a stat sig benefit on variance, which is really remarkable if you think about it, given the low number of patients in that segment in the trials, right? I think that that is convincing. I think we've now built on that with this very unique nephro protective effect that Attruby has -- that is still in its early days right now. I don't think that, that message has fully gone out to the community. We just published a paper on it a couple of months ago. I think it's going to take 6 to 9 months for people to fully appreciate just how profound that renal protective effect is that Attruby confers. I think the third thing which we've heard from physicians is real-world evidence. And so of course, the most convincing real-world evidence is when it's not published by us. So far, there have been, I think, 3 studies to my understanding. One, we've been involved with, the other 2 we haven't been involved with. Even in studies where we are not involved, you are seeing that acoramidis outperforms tafamidis in real-world settings. We hear that there is going to be a big publication at HFSA on real-world evidence, which I think will further move the field in terms of understanding how to use these drugs in the real-world setting. So those are the kinds of things which I think are going to be important. I think our job right now is to educate physicians on all these benefits, which have already been generated. I think the other factor, which we don't need to educate physicians on but which maybe we need to do a better job educating the Wall Street on is things like channel dynamics, which mean that even in 2031, when Vyndamax does eventually go generic, because this is a channel controlled by specialty pharmacies, institutional specialty pharmacies as opposed to payers, we do think that volume for Attruby is going to remain high. And I actually think if you look at drugs like this and we updated our corporate deck, we have some examples there now. If you look at these kinds of situations, you always see that the second-gen differentiated product continues to grow after the first-gen product has a loss of exclusivity. And I also know that some of your own work suggest that. So I think you can also help us with that.

Derek Archila

analyst
#9

Well, I was going to say also when you think about kind of the dynamics and some of this kind of came out at ESC in terms of we're treating these patients earlier. And I always kind of feel like there's this maybe it's a wrong way to think about it, but like after 2031, generic tafamidis comes and then it just Attruby goes off a cliff. But the fact of the matter is if you're putting patients on 2029 and 2030, they're probably going to be on drug for 4 to 5 years and the payers are not really going to make you switch a patient that's doing well, right? So like you have that maybe at least giving you that kind of revenue tail and then it's up to you in terms of like, again, talking about those channel dynamics in terms of just keeping the volume increasing, maybe slower, but you're still running.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#10

I agree with you.

Derek Archila

analyst
#11

Yes. We've done our homework. So I guess...

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#12

Well, you have done a lot of work on this. I know you're up to date.

Derek Archila

analyst
#13

Yes. So I guess when we think about TTR in general, I guess, were there any other kind of takeaways from ESC in terms of where you think the field is going just from an overall perspective in terms of the diagnosis rate and the growth because you've got a lot of tailwinds just in that sense as well.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#14

Yes. So that's a very good point. And actually, if I think about the 2 biggest tailwinds for Attruby, one of them is the fact that the frontline market continues to grow. So before we launched in 2024, we were saying that there are about 8,000 to 12,000 new patients, frontline patients who start an [indiscernible] therapy every year in the U.S. I think about 6 to 9 months ago, we updated that to say that there are, call it, 12,000 to 16,000 patients. And I think now what we are seeing is that there are at least 16,000 patients. So if you see you've gone from 8,000 to 16,000 over a period of 2 years and it's still growing, right? And our share in that market is also growing. So that is a big tailwind, nothing at ESC -- everything at ESC reinforced that. The more awareness about ATTR-CM, the more patients people find with this disease. So I actually feel every time we have these big conferences where there's a lot of focus on this disease, it helps a lot with diagnosis. It helps a lot with awareness. So that is definitely a big tailwind for us. And I actually think that, that tailwind, coupled with the differentiation and slow gains in share are the 2 reasons why despite the fact that we have some headwinds such as the second-line pool normalizing such as Pfizer rebating, we are able to keep growing consistently. And that is why if you saw last quarter, we had nice growth quarter-over-quarter. And if you look at the next few quarters, we expect that to keep going.

Derek Archila

analyst
#15

Got you. And not to put you on a spot, but in terms of like [indiscernible] uses in the front line. I mean, I guess I almost say they're growing. You guys are saying you're growing. So is Pfizer not growing? Or is everyone growing? Like how are the share dynamics going? And I guess, where do you guys think you'll be -- because I think 1 of the things that you guys had said in the past was like your assumption was it was going to be a 4-player market and what your share was going to be. So will you update some of those estimates?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#16

Great. I'll take that in the reverse order. Yes, we have said before that we expect that peak Attruby to get 30% to 40% share. We're doing more market research now, and we will update it. I will say that, that is at peak. I do think, as I mentioned, it's going to take a year or so for these messages to truly get understood by the community. So I do think for the next few quarters, we will keep growing by that $25 million to $30 million quarter-over-quarter sales absolute number that we have said before. I do think we will update that 30% to 40% peak share number. Does it go 35% to 45%, 35% to 40%, wait to see that. I will not create that issues right now. The second thing, which I would say is how are the frontline dynamics evolving, this is a stabilizer first market, right? So more than 80% of frontline patients by our calculation start on a stabilizer. That number is not really changing. And really what's changing is a majority of patients today start on Vyndamax. Little by little, I think we're making inroads such that we are getting a little more share, right? So if you think about it, let's try to make very rough, if more than 80% are on a stabilizer, that means less than 20% are on a knockdown. Most of that is obviously going to [indiscernible] of the remaining 80%. If I say half of the stabilizer patients more than that are on Vyndamax, that means 55% or so, 60% are starting on Vyndamax. We have said our own share is north of 25% and growing slowly. And so that is how that is evolving.

Derek Archila

analyst
#17

Excellent. Maybe shift gears to the pipeline because there's so much to talk about, but I think it Attruby seems like growing base business [indiscernible] and more to come in terms of some data on differentiation. It seems like that's the message.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#18

Yes.

Derek Archila

analyst
#19

So it's like kind of dealer's choice is what we should start with [indiscernible].

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#20

Should start with [indiscernible] because or...

Derek Archila

analyst
#21

Yes, let's do that. Because I mean, this is probably 1 where maybe the unmet need is the highest. But Anna, maybe you want to kind of just lay the foundation in terms of like the indication and basically the therapy that you guys will be bringing to the market.

Anna Wade

executive
#22

Yes, absolutely. So BBP-418 has been developed for [indiscernible]. There are no currently approved therapies in the space. And as you said, the unmet need is incredibly high. We're super excited about the potential that BBP-418 has in this indication. So we read out our interim analysis from our Phase III trial last year. In that study, we not only saw differences from placebo that was [indiscernible] significant and not all of our primary endpoints. But the differences observed were actually on treatment. There are improvements from baseline, which is pretty much unprecedented in the muscular dystrophy field. And then there were declines on placebo that were consistent with the natural history. Overall, this patient population is around 7,000 patients in the U.S. and EU, we estimate currently in the U.S. is about 2,000, 2,500 patients.

Derek Archila

analyst
#23

Got it. So I guess what's the launch in this indication look like?

Anna Wade

executive
#24

So yes, it's basically a very concentrated call point, so around 150 to 160 MDA centers in the U.S., where the vast majority of these patients that are genetically diagnosed are currently treated. So it's a very targeted like capital efficient launch. The we're very focused right now on finding patients. So we've mentioned that we've identified over 500 patients currently -- and as I said, most of these patients are currently at the concentrated core point. So our field force is currently our educating physicians, payers and we're anticipating that adoption will be very strong based on our market research so far.

Derek Archila

analyst
#25

Yes, I was going to say like in terms of like the doctors and the education process, like how long do you think that will take? And is it -- because this is an indication where the therapies, is this going to be where basically every can is -- or every patient is a candidate essentially? Or are there going to be some kind of narrowing of the actual true candidates that would actually be best to respond on the drug?

Anna Wade

executive
#26

Yes. Great question. So what we're hearing right now is -- you're absolutely right. So most patients are going to be considered a candidate for therapy here and adoption is very high across all patients. The main sort of drivers of that are obviously that currently, there are no available therapies. These patients are anticipating that they have to climb year-on-year and we actually saw in the interim analysis that were benefits as early as 3 months on the ambulatory measures, which is really driving urgency to treat. I think currently, what might there's a lot of, obviously, patient need that will be driven by very strong patient advocacy groups to that are doing a lot of the education on the patient side. And then in terms of physicians, as I mentioned, we already have the field force out there. I think we're not anticipating a bolus though, just because I think the dynamics in the centers are that you're not getting the patients currently go into centers about once every year or twice a year. So that might mean that sort of patients calling on physicians might have some -- there might be some delay in them getting into the centers.

Derek Archila

analyst
#27

I mean, I guess when you think about these patients in their kind of the journey to diagnosis, like how long does that take? And what's kind of your method of even just finding these patients? Are they good ICD-9, ICD-10 codes to locate these patients? Or is this still kind of like a lot more kind of digging in work that you need to do?

Anna Wade

executive
#28

It's a combination. So basically, right now, there is a dedicated ICD-10 code, which is great. It went into effect last October, though, so it's still relatively new. We are seeing uptake already and is continuing to see new patients come in every month. We also have data from genetic testing databases where we've been able to identify patients as well. And what we're anticipating that, that genetic diagnosis will continue to increase. Based on market research now, it seems like the standard of care in these specialist centers is that people are getting genetically diagnosed as standard of care. So it's really about patients getting to those centers, which is probably the delay in diagnosis. But once they're there, they are getting diagnosed efficiently with [indiscernible] testing.

Derek Archila

analyst
#29

Got you. Now this is a different type of launch than I would say it would be like more rarities more focused. So I guess are there any key learnings that you can take from kind of the Attruby experience and kind of apply it to the BBP-418?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#30

Yes. I think that there are 2 different architects of launches, right? There is a launch in the competitive market, which is Attruby and infigratinib, and then there's launch in a market which you are building, which is 418 and [indiscernible], right? I think that some of the similarities, there are some differences such as marketing and things like that. But there are some similarities such as how do you design a process which quickly gets patients on drug, right? So not the kind of payer side of access, but more the patient and physician process side of access. Sure, I'll let Anna comment on that because 1 thing which obviously Attruby we have white club service really working closely with the physicians' offices as well as the patients to get them on drug. And that is going to be key here also. So maybe, Anna, I'll let you comment on how you guys are thinking about it and learning from Attruby.

Anna Wade

executive
#31

Yes. So I mean, we're out there right now to talking to payers. Payer research has been incredibly positive as well, like they're very receptive to the data that we've seen. As we mentioned, this is like the notes to seeing placebo-controlled data in the neuromuscular space and then also seeing these improvements from baseline in the functional measures is pretty differentiating. So we're not anticipating sort of big coverage huddles for access reinvestment. We are planning on offering a similar suite of services to what was mentioned for Attruby for getting patients on drug at launch.

Derek Archila

analyst
#32

I guess it's a good pricing analog for [indiscernible].

Anna Wade

executive
#33

Yes. So we -- the pay as always referred to the [indiscernible] is here is the nice relevant pricing analog. I think, as I mentioned, the main difference here is that we're seeing functional benefits in a polebo-controled setting, which they haven't really seen in that case. So I think you would think that about those as like an analog as sort of the anchor and then we might think about premium pricing on that.

Derek Archila

analyst
#34

And the 3 launches discussed the other 2, but do you think [indiscernible] has the potential to be the fastest ramping? Or do you think there's kind of like some, I don't know, friction points just because it's a new indication that's never had a therapy approved there.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#35

Maybe I'll start and then I'll ask you to build on it. So I think that we think all these 3 launches are going to be really good, strong launches. As Anna mentioned, we don't expect there to be a bolus or anything like that in any of these launches, look, there are going to be new to market edits. These are markets which we are building. There's going to be diagnosis, which we are educating people on. All of that, especially for [indiscernible] ADH1 is true. But nothing specific that I would call out as a pain point. It's all things that are team has diligently -- actually, these guys have done a great job of mapping each step of the patient journey as well as each step of the physician journey and making sure that at every point where there is potential for friction, we have a plan for how to overcome it. And so I think that it's -- they're all going to go really well. We feel good about them. And then I think your question was if this 1 will be faster than some of the other ones. And on that one, I'm going to ask you guys to do some work.

Derek Archila

analyst
#36

You don't want to pick your favorite child?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#37

I am told that that's not my...

Anna Wade

executive
#38

You can't do that on...

Derek Archila

analyst
#39

That's fair. All right. Well, maybe moving on -- so let's maybe talk about Encaleret in H1. So a smaller population. You guys have been doing a lot of work in identifying patients. So maybe just talk about the setup there for that launch.

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#40

Yes. So very excited about it, right? Because these patients who have ADH1, first of all, the prevalence is probably about 12,000. So there are a ton of patients who are suffering with this disease. Currently, we have only genetically confirmed and identified about 500 patients. But we know that in the claims data, there is already about 20 to 100 patients. So we know that there are more patients that we can go after and try and convert. So huge unmet need. The drug basically normalizes the patient, right? Because your [indiscernible] burden urine calcium levels become normal. PTH levels become normal. That is a profound effect -- so we're very excited about that. I think that the call point is concentrated, but not as concentrated as [indiscernible] right? I think here, you're going after a slightly broader pool of endocrinologists. But what's very interesting is that there is extremely high overlap with hypoparathyroidism. Actually, if you have nonsurgical hypoparathyroidism, the guidelines recommend that you get tested for ADH1. What that means is we have a group of physicians who we can identify and target at launch, and really try to, a, drive diagnosis there; b, drive awareness there and then also try and convert some of their patients where ADH1 patients onto our drug. In terms of, I think, how we expect the launch to go, very similar to [indiscernible], I think that it should be a strong steady launch, building on top of each other. It is an autosomal dominant disease. So one thing which we have seen is once we find a few people in the family who have the disease, we can do sponsored family testing and find a lot more people who have their disease. So that's actually a pretty interesting kind of difference between these 2 diseases. And I definitely do think that pricing here is going to be less than [indiscernible], but still extremely strong. I think the comps that we've given on the lower end are [indiscernible], which is about $300,000, and then on the high end, Uwe, which is about $500,000. I do think it's possible we are closer to the high end than the low end given the drug is has significant benefits. And that's how we think about it. And of course, what's very exciting about Encaleret is -- and I know you probably going to want to talk about this is there is a huge expansion indication in hypoparathyroidism right behind it. We're very excited that we have kicked off a Phase III trial there. We expect that trial to read out pretty shortly here by the end of '27. [indiscernible] Some of the sickest HP patients. They didn't have the parathyroid gland and completely independent of PTH we saw normalization of blood and urine calcium in a majority of those patients. That's really a profound benefit, especially normalization of urine calcium, which is a key unmet need area. I think second -- and I'm going to be a bit quick here because I know we're running out of time, but we expand -- Neil actually expanded upon this in our -- on our earnings call. But mechanistically, there is a strong rationale for an agent acting on the cash-in sensing receptor in the kidney to have an effect on in each. And so I would really encourage you guys to listen to that. And I think he goes into a good amount of detail, which I can't cover here due to lack of time. So that's just the papers which are coming out. Some of that is very new. They've come out this year has also really encouraged us to go after it. And then the third thing really is we derive a lot of our confidence from experts in the field like talking like [indiscernible] as well as other folks who really understand these endocrinology diseases. And I think that, that KOL excitement is the third thing, which has made us excited about starting a Phase III here and helping a lot of patients.

Derek Archila

analyst
#41

Got it. So yes, maybe let's move to infigratinib just so we can get through it. But this is 1 excellent data, Phase III data in achondroplasia first oral agent in that indication as well. And with the launch of UV, we're definitely learning that the market is getting larger. And there's patients that were not really being -- they didn't want to go on box. So I guess -- now a couple of months now into the UV well launch, where are you guys kind of thinking about -- or are you more excited about the infragratinib upcoming launch and ultimately the opportunity there for an oral agent?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#42

We are extremely excited about the infagratinib launch. We have been for a long time. What is remarkable is that we have a best-in-class drug, oral, best-in-class estimate on efficacy. But what is even more exciting and we presented at SP, and we had a press release on this earlier today, is we are moving beyond height now, right? The benefits are not just on height. And yes, we talked about proportionality, which is a big deal in this community with our top line. And now at SP, we talked about sleep apnea, ear infections. The fact that infigratinib was able to show clinically significant large benefits on these things, which are on these measures beyond height, I think is means that this will be able to grow the market significantly. If you look in Europe, about 3/4 or so of patients of kids are on some [indiscernible] option in America, maybe a 1/4 are. And really that difference is moving beyond height and having an oral option. And that, I think, is the opportunity for infigratinib, and I think that is why we are very excited to be able to -- we've partnered with the community, learned so much from them along our development journey, and now we are excited to serve them in the commercial round assuming the FDA approves the drug.

Derek Archila

analyst
#43

Got you. I mean do you -- is this mostly like new start market? Do you think you'll switch patients? Like how do you think you'll get your foothold. And as you said, I think your data on body proportionality and that is going to be pretty meaningful for docs and for the patients. So what do you kind of envision early in the launch?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#44

Yes. So we are going to be pulling from 3 segments of children. The first segment of families and children that we're going to be pulling from are children who are on [indiscernible] today. they are on it because there's no other option. They understand that moving beyond height is what they're looking for. They don't want to take injections. And so an oral option, which has benefits -- significant benefits beyond height would be appealing to them, right? And that's going to be a key market for us, but of course, that's a smaller portion of the children in the U.S. The second group of children are children who have tried [indiscernible]. And for whatever reason, either because there was no benefit beyond height or because they could not take the injections, they've decided to go off of [indiscernible]. We know that those children and those families want something. We suspect what they want is an oral option, which moves beyond height. And we think that we'll be able to offer it to them, and that's the second group. The third group of families and children that we are hoping to help are folks who have never tried [indiscernible] some of them are needle for [indiscernible], some of them really want to be on an agent which helps on things like proportionality and not just height. And so that's going to be the third sort of segment that we're going to be targeting. And I think we're going to see uptake in all 3 segments. And I think that what we are most excited about is growing the market, so segments 2 and 3. But I do think segment 1 is also going to be important.

Derek Archila

analyst
#45

Got you. Maybe with the last [indiscernible] here, Chief Business Officer. Like as you think about the kind of overall business, Attruby, pipeline launches, like -- so we're going to have these launches is going to be 2027 event. That's going to be exciting. But what's kind of next, right? That's overall we is like what's kind of next in the pipeline? Where are you guys going to be kind of focusing your efforts and as you said, kind of where are you going to take your resources and deploy the capital?

Chinmay Shukla

executive
#46

Yes, that's a great question. And I'm not surprised that Wall Street is asking what's next. So here's how we think about it, right? I think our first priority is funding and accelerating the Attruby launch as well as the launches in [indiscernible] and ADH. Best and highest use of our capital. I think that's what shareholders will reward us probably for over the next 12 months. Beyond that, I think that we really want to invest in our pipeline, whether -- the main idea there is our hypopara trial. And so that I also think is on investors' radars and something that you're prioritizing. Beyond that, if we have excess capital, which we do right now, we're in the lucky position of having excess capital, having our losses come down over time. We always think about what's the right way to deploy capital. It could be through share buybacks, but it could also be at the right time, and our preferred path is to do it through organic growth. So we want to start new R&D programs, like I mentioned to you. And I think you are pretty close to this. You've covered a lot of genetic disease companies. There is profound innovation happening in our space and the opportunity to help patients with events. So we have a sister company called GondolaBio, where we own about a 12%, 13% stake at the right time, maybe it's sooner, maybe it's later, but I hope it's sooner we would like to integrate these companies, use the cash flows and the capital which we have to accelerate that and to really make not just 4 medicines, but to make 40 medicines. And I think that, that's the shape of company with investors patients and the community can be very excited about, and that's what we are aiming to build.

Derek Archila

analyst
#47

Chinmay, I think we'll leave it there. Anna, thank you so much.

Anna Wade

executive
#48

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.