Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 9, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Professional Services conference_presentation 26 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#1

Good afternoon. This is Pete Heckmann. I'm one of the research analysts on the tech team at D.A. Davidson. Thanks for participating in our Software and Internet Services Conference. Today, we have an interactive chat with Broadridge. We're pleased to have the company's CEO, Tim Gokey; as well, Edings Thibault, Head of Investor Relations, is also participating in mute mode. Good afternoon, Tim.

Timothy Gokey

executive
#2

Hi, how are you? Good to see you.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#3

Yes. Good to see you as well. Thanks for participating. Would you like to make any opening comments?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#4

Yes. Why don't I start. I know that you have a lot of questions, but let me just take a couple of minutes for those that are just tuning into the Broadridge story just to get oriented. We are, as you know, Pete, a global fintech leader, focused on creating industry solutions for critical, but non-differentiating activities in financial services, capital markets, wealth management, asset management firms. And we think we have a lot of opportunity ahead, very, very good long-term outlook. We believe we're in the midst of a multi-decade trend towards financial services firms, leveraging industry solutions. And the ops and tech spend amongst our clients is on the order of $100 billion. Just amongst the solutions that we have, the market is over $40 billion, relative to our $3 billion in fee revenues, is basically a lot of runway for us. The growth platforms that we'll talk about, governance, capital markets, wealth and investment management. And in governance, as you know, we connect every investor, broker-dealer, fund complex and public company. And then that allows us to provide a lot of other solutions to that client set. Capital markets is Software-as-a-Service technology platform is largely back office. And similarly, wealth management, we're going more front-to-back now with that. What we do is we provide an essential service for an industry that is essential. And the COVID crisis really has reaffirmed the essential nature of what we do, powering the infrastructure behind investing, governance and communications. And as we went through the crisis, the -- we really saw our technology platforms performed well. We processed record volumes to support both capital markets and wealth management clients, enabling investors to buy and sell securities, generate liquidity, fund new investments, participate in markets with timely statements, which is baked in corporate governance, enable companies to continue corporate governance through the crisis. So the business is very resilient. It performed very well operationally. Production team has managed well. We had proxy season right in the heart of the crisis on the East Coast. Public companies rapidly shifted from in-person annual meetings to virtual annual meetings. We did 300 virtual annual meetings a year ago. This year, we did 1,500. So as a result of all of that, we have continued to perform soundly from a financial perspective. Our fiscal year, which ended in June, we had 10% recurring revenue growth, 8% earnings growth, record closed sales. We raised our dividend for the 14th consecutive year. We've raised it every year since we became a public company. And as we look forward, we see a strong outlook. So despite the uncertainty in the macroeconomic environment, we are calling for continued organic growth, and that is anchored by a record backlog of signed contracts to be on-boarded as well as really trying to balance cost discipline with investment for the future. And we think that will really position us to take advantage of [ return ]. So our guidance for fiscal '21, which we just started is a little bit wider, reflecting that economic uncertainty, and it's modestly lower than what would be our normal sort of multiyear growth algorithm. And that guidance really incorporates the impact of recession, delivering good returns to shareholders, continuing to invest for the long term and really managing that balance of disciplined cost on one side and reinvesting for the future on the other side. Longer term, we think COVID is really accelerating existing trends, is causing some very fundamental changes about how people think about resilience. It's not just I might lose a facility, I can lose the globe. And so the investment for that, it really is extension of the case for mutualization as well as digitization. We are focused on long-term growth. And as you think about us, we're really -- think about us as an annual company because the results are fairly seasonal. So we don't focus much on the quarter, we focus on the year, and we focus on 3-year periods. We've just finished a 3-year period in which we met or exceeded all of our primary financial objectives. And that's the second time we've ever done that, so 6 years. I will be announcing our new 3-year objectives at our Investor Day in December. So that's a quick rundown. I just wanted to hit those points. So just the basics, to be able to tune in as we move on to the questions.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#5

That's very helpful, Tim. And as we've talked about with investors, we thought that Broadridge is really well positioned to weather the impacts of the pandemic and the related economic slowdown. You've given a high level of fixed recurring revenue. There's a couple of pockets of variable recurring revenue. But just as you said, finished fiscal 2000 very strong, gave good guidance for fiscal '21. And even bookings, strong bookings in the June period. Bookings for fiscal 2020, I think, were up about 2%, but that was impacted by a real tough comparison. So it kind of downplays how good the bookings were. Can you talk a little bit about -- when you look at those themes, you talked about earlier mutualization, governance, outsourcing, what areas are contributing to bookings today?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#6

Yes. We really saw strength across our business, which is interesting. I guess maybe the common thread across all of our businesses is this theme of mutualization. So next-generation governance, there is a lot going on this year. Shareholder rights directive in Europe was a big thing for us as well as this move to virtual annual meetings. So those 2 things really helped our governance side. Also sort of broadly into the governance umbrella, our data-driven solutions for fund companies, had a very good year. And we had some very strong sales actually in customer communications as well. And that's one that we've been working on for a while, but it's that theme of as things go more digital, large players lose scale in their in-house facilities and turning to outside help for that. Also on the capital markets side, we added a large European bank. We had not a big sale, but an important one for us. We had the first sale of our blockchain-based solution for repurchase agreements or repos. And then on the wealth management side, lots of sales, and in particular, we did a couple of acquisitions last year, particularly RPM in Canada, that had a very, very strong sales year, way out ahead of its business case and really contributed to a nice year on the wealth management side. So we think, and I said in my open that the COVID pandemic is really reinforcing the long-term trends that are driving our business, including mutualization, digitization, importance of data and analytics. And so we're seeing that impact across the business.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#7

That's great. That's great. And as you know, your bookings can be lumpy, and you provided some guidance for 2021 that had a little bit wider range on both revenue, earnings and bookings, but with a very strong new business backlog, I think $300-plus million. If there are any temporary delays in bookings in the back half that you -- I guess our view is that, that really shouldn't affect your fiscal 2021 guidance or really the timing of when eventual deals go live.

Timothy Gokey

executive
#8

I think that's right. I think it is -- there's always a fraction of what we do that are nearing kinds of things where we might contract with someone and implement it in the same year. So if there were a decline in bookings, it could potentially have some revenue impact, even though we have that big backlog. That said, going into the year was sort of more than a year's worth of expected growth sort of already signed, is one of the things that makes me sleep just a little bit better at night. And I feel really good as we have been really scaling up our implementation capabilities. And you always hear me talk about improving our product and technology capabilities, and we're beginning to see that in greater flow-through on the implementation side.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#9

That's great. That's great. And so to your point, within the backlog, there are some deals that may take 15 months, 18 months or longer to implement. One of those is the real significant deal that you signed with UBS Wealth Management to build a next-generation adviser desktop. Can you talk a little bit about that deal? Kind of how long it took you to secure it, some of the things that you're doing to build those capabilities, and your time line -- your remaining time line to get that contract live.

Timothy Gokey

executive
#10

Yes. Pete, it's really one that came together -- it did come together over a couple of years as we were shaping our strategy and UBS was shaping its strategy and did a pretty comprehensive look across the entire technology landscape in terms of who it could partner with. And it was actually one of the things that crystalized our strategy in the sense that they didn't find anyone. And the issue is there's really no scale technology player serving the wealth management industry. So you either have to build it all yourself, of which really no one wants to do that. We have to buy a whole series of piece parts and put them together. And the whole objective of this ecosystem that we're creating with UBS as the first client, but others behind it, is to leverage our back office, but modernize very open data layer, all the market type connectivity, put an integration layer on that. And using modern technology with APIs and micro services, have a series of apps on that -- on top of that, some of which will be run by us, some of which will be UBS, some of which will be third parties, all inside of our modern container that allows context passing as all the security, all of those things that are really common across all of those apps. So that vision is really, I think, pretty exciting for UBS. It's giving us something very modern. It's really upgrading our capabilities around managed accounts, around performance reporting and goal-based investing, but in many other ways as well. And that's going to be, I think, very applicable to really any of the top 20 broker-dealers.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#11

Great. Great. And while UBS may wind up being one of your larger wealth management clients, you've been building a collection of solutions for the wealth management sector for a number of years, both through acquisition and then through further internal development. Can you talk about -- right now, you continue to break down the business into 2 primary segments, investor communications and global technology and outsourcing. But within that, can you kind of quantify about how much wealth manage would be? And what do you see as the vision in that space?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#12

Yes, absolutely. It is -- as you said, it's -- the strategy is a combination of a holistic platform, but also the individual components that can be consumed individually. And we've been building that both organically and through acquisitions. We've made more than $400 million of acquisitions in the wealth management space. If you -- and we will be giving a sweet preview of this on our Investor Day, so reason to tune in, in terms of more detail about the businesses underneath the 2 big segments. But if you look at wealth management today, it's between $400 million and $500 million. It's been growing very nicely, both organically and with the acquisitions. And I think when you look -- we announced really at our last Investor Day, our strategy of really creating a much more substantial business in wealth management. And you're going to really see, I think, a nice trajectory there as we show sort of where we were and where we are now, and then where we look forward to. And I think this can be certainly above our typical organic growth rate for a long time to come. And that will become an increasingly important part of our business.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#13

That's great. That's great. And just in terms of you talked about really not seeing another competitor at that level with the top 20, top 30 capital markets firms that could have those capabilities. But as you go along, do you see yourself becoming -- who else would you be competing with as you continue to grow the wealth management space? Would it be the SS&Cs or Thomson Financials or Envestnets of the world?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#14

Yes. I think everyone has a little bit different flavor. SS&C is very focused on the buy side. Envestnet is really -- and they're probably the closest thing to someone as a technology provider to wealth management space, but they're a very much investment management firm. So it's a very different business model than our business model. And Thomson, their -- which is now Refinitiv and now LSE, and sort of their commitment to this business in the U.S. wealth management has been something that has sort of come and gone over time, and we'll see as they evolve whether that grows or sort of -- I think the stability of sort of just where the piece that was Thomson, that then was Refinitiv, that now is LSE, and how does it feel with LSE. So I think it's a little bit unclear when that will end up.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#15

Might create some questions in the marketplace. Okay. And you referred to about maybe $400 million of acquisitions in wealth management. But one of the things that I've always admired about Broadridge is the M&A program, really a core competency of finding, selecting and negotiating a lot of -- or relative lot of smaller deals. And I think over the last maybe 18 months, maybe done 9 acquisitions. Can you talk about your framework, how you evaluate deals and what type of returns you're expecting? And over time, there's been a few deals that have been maybe just what I would characterize as medium-size relative to your base, like RPM. But as the base revenue gets bigger, do you think the acquisitions get bigger?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#16

Yes. So first of all, just the basic frame. In fintech, acquisition is sort of an evergreen growth strategy because there's always change, there are always teams that are leaving a bank, or an asset manager and creating something. And many of them fail, but the ones that don't, may create a really good product and get a core of clients. And so as we look at the things that our clients need, so as we build that internally, and we have a lot of internal builds. But if we can locate a great piece of technology that's already proven, has already been through that 5- to 10-year grind to sort of get to that point. That can be a really good way for us to accelerate bringing value to our clients. So we're always looking for things. And because we have a pretty broad business portfolio, that gives a wide lens of us -- things for us to look at. But we're always looking at, are we a really good owner of this? Because we are typically competing with PE firms. They use leverage, we don't. And so we have to really believe that there are really good, fit reasons why we're best owner. Typically, that's around revenue growth. Typically, if we can take a solution, really industrialize it, bring it into Broadridge, use our MSAs, use our sales force, we have a very good track record of increasing the growth trajectory of these smaller companies. So it's worked out really well for us. I think in terms of size, it's more work to do smaller ones. When you think about what we're doing, think about sort of the alternative or complement to product development, it's a lot of work to develop new products as well. So that's sort of the vein we looked at it. As we think about increasing the size, we certainly look at things and look at larger things, it is definitely through the competitiveness of larger deals is much higher. So if you look at the 40-plus deals we've done in the 10 years or so that I've been here, almost half of those have been proprietary, where we get to know entrepreneurs over time, we get a really good look at something. When you get into larger deal sizes, you have a much higher competitive intensity and still the internal rates of return are a bit down. We've always talked about, and even though, we've always talked about sort of 20% as our hurdle rate, I think as you look at larger things in a market like this, you're probably talking more mid-teens than 20%. But obviously, on a bigger capital basis, still some really good value creation for shareholders.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#17

Definitely, definitely. And now your predecessor was very focused -- not very focused, but the company has always been very focused on keeping debt levels very reasonable. And your preferred metric, debt to EBITDA, I think on that metric, you're about 2.0x. You don't like to go much above 2.2x. Do you share that same belief that the leverage and the investment-grade rating matters to customers and -- or for the right type of deal, could we see Broadridge taking leverage up to, let's say, 3x?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#18

Yes. I think we have always believed that being investment-grade is helpful. And certainly, we do have competitors that are not investment grade. But we have an organic growth strategy, and they don't necessarily have -- it's just a different paradigm. We have taken leverage up at times when we had the right opportunities, and then we paid it back down. And we just -- we did that this past year, and we've delevered back to about 2.0. We just repaid our $400 million outstanding notes that came due just last week. So as we go forward, I think, as -- all options are always on the table. We're very comfortable with our current approach. And it just -- it would depend on just how compelling something was. But if it's the right thing for clients in the end -- again, you always look at things, but even -- it's not a philosophical difference from my predecessor. It's really a belief that being investment-grade is really the right thing for the clients, at least here.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#19

Yes. Yes, that's fair, that's fair. Okay. And the -- on the subject of the event-driven proxies, I think the company has always had great disclosure as regards that, on a current quarter basis and a historical basis. And this nonrecurring revenue can come through at high incremental margins, and so it can influence a given quarter. Now in fiscal '20, event-driven proxy revenue fell about 27% on a uniquely difficult comparison. But as part of your fourth quarter presentation, you gave a multiyear history to provide context of the range. And with a long-term coverage to Broadridge, it seems to me that there's a number of factors that go into it, and there's no real catalysts that necessarily drive a good year or a bad year. But can you talk about some of the dynamics in event-driven and how that can kind of play into the revenue stream? And how -- given some of the uncertainty or the lack of visibility more than a quarter or 2 out in event-driven, how do you incorporate that in your annual guidance?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#20

Yes, absolutely. It's a funny one because we really are -- we're this company with very high recurring, very high defensibility, really sort of steady as she goes, and this is a small part of pretty volatile revenue that I think is -- if you understand that as investor and see through it, it actually makes -- is attractive for us. As you know, people have said this many times, event-driven revenue, while it can be inconvenient, over time, it's really attractive. It comes in high margin, as you said, and it does grow over time because it's based on a number of positions. So as there is long-term position growth, I have an event now, I may not have that same event for a few years. But when you have that same event 3 years from now, it will be bigger. And so long term, is a growth trend. We did see quite a -- and again, just as background, it's about half corporate events. So think about activism and other kinds of things where people need to get out reminders for other things for elections. And it's about half mutual fund or directors elections. Those don't happen every year like corporate ones do. And so when the larger funds have them, that creates those spikes that you see, and they tend to be on a sort of a 5- to 7-year cycle. So we had a sort of a remarkably low year last year, really historic lows each quarter until the fourth quarter. And that led to just under 180 for the year, down very significantly from the year before. That we don't -- we never say that there's a floor, but that was pretty historic lows. We have planned that flat for this coming year. And we don't see any real catalyst for something that's going to make it really pick up in the near term or any big mutual fund proxies that are scheduled. But as you say, it's very unpredictable.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#21

Right. Right. And so that would be one swing factor that could play into some variance in the range of your annual guidance. The other thing is somewhat of a difficult comparison with at least half the year with equity trading volumes. But when you think about any other factors that investors should be thinking about in terms of -- that can play into your numbers, and it could create some variance towards the high end or low end of your guidance ranges?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#22

Yes. I think the things that tend to be sort of swing factors very much on the margin. Certainly, event is, by far, the biggest factor, and that can make a difference in our growth rate in a given year. Interest rates are a big headwind this year and -- because in one -- in our mutual fund stock trading -- mutual fund trading business, we end up with some cash reserves there. And -- but I think -- and the interest rate's coming back soon. So I think that's probably not going to be a swing factor this year. Trading volumes are a swing factor, and they will be the book comps at the end of next year, as you mentioned. And then the other one is stock record growth. Stock record growth for equities, interim record growth for mutual funds. And I think our assumption is that those will be fairly muted. If those take off, then that will be a help to our plan.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#23

Got it. Got it. Okay. And we're almost out of time here, but the -- I've always thought that the company's practice of giving 3-year guidance, at least for the 6 years that you've done that, is really a best practice and gives investors certainly some more comfort in how management thinks about the business. You have an Analyst Day coming up in December, an Investor Day coming up in December. Do you just want to remind us of the date and talk about your intention to continue to provide a 3-year framework for growth in margins?

Timothy Gokey

executive
#24

Yes. It's December 8. And if I got that date wrong, Edings will text me immediately, and I'll correct it before I finish this answer. But it's December 8. And we will have an ability to -- he says, that's right. So that's good. And we'll have an ability to really just walk through more than we can in any given earnings call, in any given presentation, each of our franchises, our progress since we last spoke and sort of where we think it's going. A real chance to highlight broader set of the management team. And definitely, we will be there with a 3-year perspective on where we're going. And look, it's important because it's -- and it's good transparency, but it's also, Pete, is how we run the company. And we always have a 3-year plan, we update it each year. It's how we think about our investments and the kind of things that we do, if it takes a year to negotiate a contract, and a year to bring it on board, it's logical to think in longer time. So the pace at which our business moves, it really -- that is the pace that moves. And so it's definitely the best way to think about it.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#25

Got it. Got it. Okay. Well, we are out of time. Tim, I really appreciate you participating today. And as well everyone else listening in. Have a great rest of the day, and we look forward to hearing from you again probably around end of October, early November.

Timothy Gokey

executive
#26

Perfect. Okay. Thank you, Pete.

Peter Heckmann

analyst
#27

Thanks again. Bye now.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.