Bruker Corporation (BRKR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 18, 2020

NASDAQ US Health Care Life Sciences Tools and Services conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#1

All right. Good morning. We're going to get started. Thanks, everyone, for joining us for Day 2 of the Jefferies 2020 Virtual London Healthcare Conference. I'm Brandon Couillard. I cover the Tools and Diagnostics sector here. It is my pleasure to have Bruker with us back at the conference again this year. Joining us for a fireside conversation this morning, CFO, Mr. Gerald Herman. And we also have Miroslava Minkova from the IR side with us as well. For those of you tuning in, please do feel free to e-mail me any questions that you might have, and I'll do my best to work them into the conversation. So with that, Gerald, great to see you. Thanks for being here.

Gerald Herman

executive
#2

Yes, thanks very much for having us. We're delighted to be here. Wish we were in London, but nonetheless, next year, hopefully.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#3

Here's the hope for better days in '21. Maybe just to kick off, Gerald, coming out of the third quarter, you did see an improvement in the BSI order book, which I'd like to get to in a minute. But as far as kind of how you're thinking about the fourth quarter shaping up. I think your guidance implied organic rev down about 4% to 8% against somewhat of an easier comp. Just curious, if you could just sort of describe and articulate, if there's been any update as far as sort of where you sit today, now that we're about halfway through the quarter? And to help us kind of understand some of the puts and takes that we should consider? On the plus side, you've got some COVID testing dynamics that are a small beginning to contribute. You've got an ultra-high field placement expected in the fourth quarter, just how are you thinking about the factors that went into refining your view on 4Q?

Gerald Herman

executive
#4

Sure. So as you said, we -- it was pretty solid third quarter and slightly down on a year-over-year basis, but sequential improvement, which was really encouraging for us, I think. Relative to the fourth quarter, as you likely know, we don't provide intra-quarter updates. We can give you a little bit of qualitative commentary around the fourth quarter just generally. Look, there's still quite a bit of uncertainty out there in the marketplace, particularly as we've seen surges in COVID-19 experience in both Europe and the U.S. specifically. And that created a little bit more uncertainty in the fourth quarter for 2020, and certainly it was there in 2019. The other thing you may or may not know is that we're -- the comp that we have for Q4 of '19, we put up almost $600 million of revenue in the fourth quarter of '19, which is a record-breaking quarter for us. So I think from a comp perspective, it is still going to be challenging for us to get to those numbers, especially under the current conditions. I would tell you, we've got a number of positives. As you've already pointed out, we've started to see some strength in the biopharma space. We've got some really interesting products on the horizon as well as moving their way through the systems in the fourth quarter. Our experience thus far with the academic markets and the research markets more generally is still pretty positive. We've not seen evidence of significant sort of lockdowns. Although it's still early in the fourth quarter relative to that, some governments have been a little bit more restrictive as that goes. And that's created a little more concern, I would guess, I would say, relative to the ability to travel, especially in Europe between countries. So there's still quite a bit of uncertainty there. So our view generally is that, that's all baked into our 2% to 6% decline on a year-over-year basis in our scenarios that we've laid out. We're still pretty comfortable with where that sits right now.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#5

As we begin to sort of think about '21, clearly, still a lot of unknowns about next year, but you will have pretty easy comps. You talked -- do you think that revenues next year can begin to almost approach 2019 levels, perhaps? And maybe talk about some of the key drivers that you're excited about in the business? You sort of spoke to some of the new products in the pipeline. What are kind of the key levers to recovery that we should think about next year?

Gerald Herman

executive
#6

Sure. So as you likely guess, we're not providing guidance or too much detail in 2021, we're hoping to move through the fourth quarter. That's our priority at the moment. But look, I think we've said on the earnings call a couple of weeks ago that we still believe that there's -- 2021, we can have healthy growth from a revenue perspective and continuing operating margin expansion. We believe that's on a comparison against 2020. You're right. The 2020 numbers are likely going to be softer for sure than we saw in periods like '19. But having said that, we still have quite a few signals that are positive for us. I mean we have -- we're carrying some pretty solid backlog into 2021. We've got a good order bookings performance coming out of the third quarter. All of that will be the case for the fourth quarter as well. We've got some really exciting products that are getting good traction. Like we know a little bit about the timsTOF platform and that's one of them. We also have some ultra-high field backlog that we're executing on in the MR space. Our microbiology and diagnostics business is performing well. I guess, I would say, particular diagnostics business. Biopharma is picking up, it seems, especially under the current condition. So we're pretty positive that things are turning in the right direction for us relative to 2021. And we'll give you more detail, of course, on that as we get into the February time frame once we've looked at full year for Q4.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#7

I'm not asking you to give guidance, but I know it seems like ancient history, but if you think back to Bruker's Analyst Day, June of '19, you laid out a target of kind of the business being able to deliver kind of 5% to 7% organic revenue growth. Is that a -- is that still a relevant sort of benchmark to think about the business maybe over the next 3 years from here? And has COVID negatively impacted any component of that growth plan in your view?

Gerald Herman

executive
#8

Look, I mean, we -- things have changed a lot from 2019, mostly from the framework of our overall performance, clearly 2020 is not what we had hoped for, for sure, relative to our peers, of course. But when we look at our overall position in terms of our product portfolio, some of the acquisitions we've brought on in 2020 combined with the performance that we will talk more about as we get to the end of the year here around Project Accelerate and some of those pillars of growth around revenue and operating margin expansion. And we're still pretty confident that we're going to be able to move in that same direction. We'll revisit that as we get into the February timeframe and see where we've ended for the full year 2020. But I do feel pretty confident that we're -- we've got all the right elements, particularly as it relates to the proteomics market. When you look at our ultra-high field initiatives rates that we are starting to execute on. If you look at the proteomics marketplace and how we've presented a number of products that tackle that market. Our Biopharma market segment is improving. Mean we do see some bright side signs on -- even on the industrial side, at least with respect to microelectronics and the semiconductor space. So we have headwinds at the moment in the industrial, industrial research and material science areas. But I'm not sure that those are going to be headwinds as we move March forward into 2021 and beyond. So to get a little bit of tailwind from some of these other areas, I think we can reach to the levels we had talked about before. But again, we'll reset that all as we get into the 2021 period and see where we are headed for the full year 2020.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#9

Coming back to the third quarter order book for BSI, I think up about mid-single digits year-over-year in the third quarter. Was that better than you had expected? And is there any particular end market color that you might be able to share that may have driven that improvement? And I -- I'm curious to what leading indicators or if you've seen a bottom in orders for some of these more industrial research-oriented customers?

Gerald Herman

executive
#10

Good question. So relative to the order performance for the BSI groups, it was solid. I mean, we're very pleased we had a softer second quarter order performance. And I think fundamentally, we were very pleased to see the performance on the third quarter. You know, there was a modest amount of catch-up in a couple of areas. But I think, generally speaking, we feel like that's a real order performance. And that bodes well, I think, for 2021 and beyond. As you likely know, our order bookings performance plays out into forward quarters, and when we say a couple or 2 or 3 quarters out. So we're pretty positive about that. I wouldn't say it surprised me necessarily, but I have to say, I was quite pleased with the performance. And we saw that largely across most of our groups with the exception, I think, of Nano and BEST. Nano, as you likely know, is more heavily focused on industrial research and industrial and academic markets, focused on that. And our BEST segment suffers a little bit from some softness in the MRI demand from our customers at the moment. So looking out into the future, I think that the expectation is that we are hopeful that we can continue to build on that order performance. It's pretty solid, I guess, with respect to some improvement in the academic market side. We saw improvements in the biopharma side. Certainly, our proteomics market improved and continue to show strength there. Our consumables, our Diagnostics business continued to show some more strong order performance. So overall, pretty pleased with the -- with how it all played out for the third quarter and hopefully in the fourth quarter.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#11

Let me stick with sort of the proteomics topic, been an exciting element kind of of the newer product pipeline for Bruker for some time. How is uptake of timsTOF been relative to your expectations so far? What inning are we in for that story? And kind of what's the upside potential here from this category next several years? And it might be helpful to also maybe understand where exactly Bruker plays in proteomics relative to some of the other mass spec vendors?

Gerald Herman

executive
#12

Sure. So we are pretty excited about what we have built thus far. I'd say it's still early meetings in terms of the overall story for the timsTOF platform. We have introduced a number of other products related to and adjacent to the timsTOF platform as well. We feel quite confident that we're starting to see uptick in a number of areas, not only in the academic research side, but also in the biopharma side, which generally has been a little unusual from a product launch perspective. We typically see more uptick in the academic research side and then ultimately, more engagement with the biopharma side much, much further out. So we're encouraged by what we've seen so far. I would say we'll do a little more calibration following a large quarter, which is the fourth quarter here on how we've landed for the full year 2020. We know that we've seen significant strength in the timsTOF platform in sales from a revenue perspective as well as from an order bookings perspective. You likely know, we're moving forward to increase our capacity as well. So we're not constrained there for future growth. I would say just generally, we're pretty positive about what we're seeing. I think it's early innings yet. We're not at an inflection point from what I can see, but we are starting to see some good growth across many market segments there. And this isn't just specific to a particular geography either. It seems to be pretty spread across most of the geographies. So we'll talk a little more on in the February time frame, once we've seen where we land. We typically do sort of a more annual calibration on a number of our systems. We can talk a little bit more about it, I would say, when we get into the February time frame. But we're quite positive about how it's moving so far.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#13

Maybe shifting gears a little bit over to China. I think that, that region saw a return to positive growth in the third quarter after a pretty soft first half. Are you able to maybe put some numbers around how much of that improvement was catch up demand from orders that may have been delayed in the first half? And if you could just give us just kind of a quick state of the union as you see it there and your confidence level that, that market may be back on a positive trajectory?

Gerald Herman

executive
#14

So you likely know, Brandon, we had coming out of prior years, very, very strong growth in China. It's been a growth driver for the entire industry, but -- including for Bruker. So coming off some pretty strong comps, the early part of 2020 was pretty soft. And they were in a deep lockdown, I think, in the early. And certainly, the first quarter came out of it in the second quarter. So we saw a little bit of catch-up in the third quarter, I think, for China. Our overall results are still a little bit mixed. There's still a little bit of uncertainty around funding activities in China. That's not quite as clear as we would like to see it. What I can say is our intelligence, at least qualitatively, it is that the recovery seems to be underway. The economic conditions are improving. Travel has lifted -- travel restrictions have been lifted largely in most of China. And so our overall business is rebounding, I would say, and we saw some of that in the third quarter. I think the other point to be made here is that, and from what we understand around the future, to talk about the Chinese government and their 5-year plan, it does appear as if technology and certainly, medical research is going to continue to be a high priority for the Chinese looking forward. So our products are pretty well positioned, I think, in that marketplace. We have good channel structures already in place there. So we're pretty optimistic for the long term for China. Will there be interruptions? Will there be some disruptions that perhaps even related to COVID-19? As we look forward, possibly. But the Chinese seem to have weathered the storm a little bit effectively at the moment under the current conditions. So we're overly pretty positive about what we see there at the moment.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#15

If we maybe pivot over to the academic research base. You're obviously over-indexed to that market and a pretty good bellwether for that space. I think you said that end market was maybe down high single, low double digits in the third quarter. But seems to be getting directionally better, although the visibility to getting back to a 100% of activity, maybe not as high amount of visibility to, just how are you feeling about the global outlook for that end market right now? And is your sense that the money is there, the orders are there, but that when researchers actually get back in their labs, that could be -- free up some of that, call it, pent-up demand perhaps?

Gerald Herman

executive
#16

Well, look, I think we had -- you're right, we did see some challenging academic research market conditions historically here in the last half year. But I would say the third quarter, we started to see some more encouraging signs. And I think that's really a positive, particularly in Europe. And also, we saw there was a lot of concern initially around China and whether the tariffs combined with some funding cuts in China would really be impacting the academic markets there. We didn't actually see a lot of that so far. And I think our overall academic intelligence that we get from some of the universities that we have very deep connections with, particularly, in Europe is that researchers are there, labs are generally open, work is underway. It might be slowed or in some instances, just delayed or a different protocol. I also want to point out that we're still relatively positive about what the funding environment is. Even here in the U.S. where one could characterize a lot of our political environment as somewhat dysfunctional, there's still a lot of positive support for medical research funding to the NIH and other institutions here in the U.S. Now we're basically seeing what Biden administration will do under the current conditions. But that, I think bodes pretty well. There's still -- even with the divided Congress, there was still quite a bit of funding -- moving through both the House of Appropriations as well as at Senate level. So there's some hope at least in the U.S., that some of that funding is going to get realized in the future. And clearly, there's -- in EU a substantial stimulus package that's floating around with likely through this -- maybe a little obstacle here and there to making that happen. But fundamentally, I think the European markets -- economic markets are going to benefit from some of that stimulus package. And you may know, you likely followed this for a while, Brandon, in the 2008-2009 period, we saw much improved academic markets coming out of stimulus funding there. And as I said earlier, when you combine the U.S., the EU and the China markets, we're pretty optimistic about what that means for the long run. One thing is very sure. Medical research is not going to be distracted. It may take a little bit more time for some of this spending to flow down to individual projects and ultimately, to the equipment side, but we're pretty positive that it's there. It's just going to take a bit of time to get exercised.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#17

Miroslava, do you have an updated number for how much of Bruker's business is actually tied to the NIH in the U.S. or Gerald?

Miroslava Minkova

executive
#18

We don't. But if you remember, Brandon, about 25% of our overall business is in the U.S., this makes it similar for the academic market. And then only a fraction of that is NIH-funded. There is a big component in the U.S. that comes from just broader university funds and other sources.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#19

Maybe shifting gears just a bit. If you look at the NMR business, kind of despite some of the challenges in the first half, but Frank's tone on the third quarter call was relatively upbeat. You've placed your second 2 gigahertz or 1.2 gigahertz system in the third quarter. Where does backlog sit today? How do you feel about the prospects of maybe placing 4 ultra-high field systems in 2021? I understand that, that can move around a lot timing-wise, and then have you begun to see order activity in the U.S. follow through, now that you've been able to deliver some systems, And you've shown the market that you can manufacture them and place them whereas most of the order book to date has been primarily just in Europe?

Gerald Herman

executive
#20

Yes. So a few comments on this. So you're right. I think Frank and the rest of the leadership team here at Bruker are pretty positive about the -- our ability to execute on the manufacturing and delivery and execution of the ultra-high field systems going forward. You likely know, we've kind of at the 3 level here in 2020. And the expectation is that we'll hopefully do greater than 3 as we look out into the future. Obviously, from my perspective, given the revenue that's associated with those and the margins, I'd like to execute on that backlog as fast as quickly as we can, we absolutely are interested in doing that and so are our customers, of course. I guess, I would say more generally, the -- as far as the backlog goes, I mean, it's still pretty substantial. It's north of $150 million. Our expectation is that we're going to be able to execute on those going forward. We seem to be able to stabilize the systems relatively quickly. That's happened over the last couple nicely. I guess, I would say. So overall, we think it's a good part of our business. It's part of the overall NOR portfolio. It's going to yield, ultimately, I think, some significant growth for us as we move forward together with some of our other MR opportunities. I think it's pretty exciting at the overall model. So we'll talk a little bit more about that as we get into the February timeframe and what we see looking forward into 2021. But it's pretty positive from my perspective thus far. And please, if I may just add. Relative to the U.S. side, I mean, we did have a couple of opportunities in the U.S. The expectation, our continuing hope is that the U.S. research community will continue to fund more ultra-high field systems. We think they're absolutely critical to understanding the structural biology in a deep way. And my expectation is, ultimately, the U.S. will continue to fund that. Whether that's 2021 or beyond, is still a little uncertain but we're still very, very optimistic about that.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#21

You played somewhat of a limited role as far as COVID response goes with your PCR test kits and equipment, some nucleic acid extraction vis-à-vis the Bruker-Hain business mostly focused in Europe. Just kind of walk through your expectations to broaden and scale up this portfolio, particularly, you talked about rapid antigen testing, just what is Bruker doing in this space today? How durable are these tailwinds? And kind of what's next to come as far as the product offering?

Gerald Herman

executive
#22

Yes. So first of all, we're very pleased to be in the market space. We're clearly not playing at the same level as some of our peers. But relatively speaking to be clear about this, $8.5 million of quarterly revenue in the third quarter around PCR testing is not a bad place to be, at least, to start. And our expectation is that we can continue to build on that. We've certainly expanded our factory capacity in the molecular diagnostics space to be able to build on that pretty, pretty strongly. Now I think there's -- Bruker-Hain was a significant strategic acquisition for us. It brought us into the molecular diagnostics space. It also gave us a channel that we didn't really have before. And now we're playing through on that. I think actually, the PCR tests and rapid antigen pilots that we're running at the moment have also given us sort of an opportunity to get into some labs, facilities that we may have been into in the past. So I think it's created sort of a beachhead for us to work off of. And we're determined to expand forward into that space. You already know, the quality of the products we generate, including our molecular diagnostics tests and tools are quite high quality. So we think we can be very competitive in that space. And it's also one of the key drivers around Project Accelerate. Molecular diagnostics is a key piece. So it's very positive from our side. We're starting off on a fairly small base, but we think we can expand it and our expectation is that we will present some other assays in future quarters that we'll continue to build on that. So we like it. We'll never be something perhaps the size of some of our peers as a matter of fact. In terms of our own growth in this area, it's pretty encouraging on my side.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#23

Got you. A couple of minutes we have left. I'd love to hear your kind of perspectives on how you're thinking about mid-term margin expansion moving forward? And I'm most interested in really how you're viewing free cash flow conversion going forward? And to what extent there may be some scope to further rationalize working capital?

Gerald Herman

executive
#24

Sure. Well, there's always room for improvement, in my mind, particularly in the working capital category for us. You likely understand that we've built up on working capital, particularly in the inventory area. It's just more I would call defensive in the sense of trying to protect our supply chain risks, and we've built some sizable working capital numbers. As a result, we have seen some improvement actually on the receivables, collection and on the DPO side, on the working capital side. So we are working that hard. And I think as we start to see an easing as we move through 2021 to a more normalized situation I think our inventory numbers will go down, and we should be in a situation where our operating cash flow improves over time. We're still generating pretty significant profitability, I would say, even under COVID-19 conditions. It's clearly not where we were in 2019, but I'm actually quite pleased and proud of how we've flexed our cost structure in the third quarter, in particular, which shows us, we do have still opportunities in operating margin expansion category. It's not all about gross margin performance, although it's going to be a good part of it. I think part of the story here is also how do we take some of the lessons we've learned under -- operating in COVID-19 conditions and translate that into more long-term sustainable OpEx control. And I think we've exercised that pretty well in the third quarter, and I'm pretty confident we continue to do that in the forward quarters. Now we're also taking some pretty significant steps. You likely know, we did some restructuring in our Nano Group to expand the margin story there. That was preCOVID. But nonetheless, that's going to sustain us going forward. We've also got a number of other initiatives underway as we normally do around operational excellence and factory improvements. That will drive further gross margin improvement. So overall, we are still very bullish on our operating margin expansion story as we go forward. And as you've already seen, when we have good solid revenue performance, we have a pretty good drop down to the operating margin level. So we're pretty confident that will drive more free cash flow in the long-term improvements as we look out.

S. Brandon Couillard

analyst
#25

Very good. Well, unfortunately, we're out of time. We'll have to leave it there. Gerald, Miroslava, thank you both for being here. Great to see you. Everybody, have a good day.

Gerald Herman

executive
#26

Yes. Thanks very much.

Miroslava Minkova

executive
#27

Bye-bye, Brandon.

Gerald Herman

executive
#28

Take care. Bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Bruker Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Bruker Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.