Canadian National Railway Company (CNR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
February 20, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Chris Wetherbee
analystWanted to kick off on time as we have one of the original scheduled railroaders here with us. We want to make sure we start on time for day 2 of the transportation track. We're very pleased to be joined by Canadian National Railway. And from CN, we have a number of executives here that we're very pleased to host. So to my left is JJ Ruest, who is the CEO of the company; we also have Ghislain Houle, who's the CFO; Keith Reardon, who's the Consumer Product Supply Chain, SVP; and Paul Butcher, who runs the IR efforts for the company. So we're very pleased to have all of you here. So thanks very much for joining us. We're going to -- I'm going to turn it over to JJ. He's going to run through some opening comments. He's got a few slides to get through. And then we'll dive into Q&A. We certainly want the conversation to be interactive. So certainly feel free to jump in with questions, just raise your hand, and we'll get you on. But again, gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate having you here.
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveThank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. Good morning to those who are joining us on the webcast. Yes, I'm on a short 24-hour trip joining my team here who's here during the conference season. And we're working hard on getting the railroad back on track with some of the help of our customers and customers association. So maybe a few comments first on some of the comments we have on this slide. It's some of the comments that we've put out when we had the fourth quarter result. We just want to update that a bit. Our volume year-to-date, as those of you who follow, our RTM are down 2%. It's not a reflection of demand. It's the reflection of some of the operating challenges that we've had. We had a bit of a cold week in mid-January. It affected both Canadian railroad. Then we had a piece of a mountain that kind of came down on our Southern BC Fraser Canyon railroad. We lost that railroad for 6 days, in and out of Vancouver. But more impactful, really much more impactful are the First Nations blockade, it started February 6. We're now into week 2, basically. This thing started February 6 on the Thursday afternoon, and we're Thursday, again. We're -- we lost the main line between Québec and Ontario between basically, East of Toronto and going East. And then also, we had, I think, some of you who may be more inclined to follow some of the more technical issues of railroad, we also had following the CP derailment of February 6, the Minister of Transport on that morning issued, what you call, a ministerial order, where he restricted the speed of train of -- so-called, hazmat train. Any train that was more than x number of railcars with hazmat. He was really targeting propane and crude, mostly crude. And that has definitely a negative impact on any railroad if you can -- if you have to run your train at 25 miles an hour because it's hazmat. And as you know, railroads are typically a single track, so it slows everything behind them. Good news is, after a week of working with the Minister of Transport and his team, he lift the order, ministerial order, last Sunday. So we also lift the embargo with the permit that we had issued the week before. So as of early this week, we're back to running at regular -- what we call regular speed on the mainline. Mainline for CN is all CTC network. So from that point of view, we're in a recovery or slow recovery from Toronto West, Toronto to West Canadian West Coast, Toronto to the U.S. because with -- the blockade in Northern BC has been removed after 5 days. That was the line to Rupert. That line is reopened. And then we had these on and off blockade, one in Winnipeg for one day, one in Edmonton for one day, some East of Montreal. So we had to adapt the operating plan back and forth. So I want to thank some railroads who have allowed us to do some detour train, which is more likely in the last week. So we've been moving some freight to try to maintain some level of activities. We're very concerned about our customers and the ability to keep running their plant, especially those who are east of Toronto. They are the one in more challenging area. And definitely, we would believe that the other Canadian Railroad will allow us to do some detour on their underutilized track between Montreal and Toronto. On the 2020, we are targeting volume growth. The -- there's opportunities out there with port business with energy, crude is a topic that comes regularly. And definitely, the province of Alberta has reassigned their crude contract to the private sector. I met the CEO of the company who bought the contract, which are running on CN, and he's keen to ramp up the commitment that he's -- that he took over from the Alberta government. Our CapEx is focused on safety, growth, technology. This year, it will be about $3 billion or roughly 20%. We're managing cost headwinds. The cost headwinds that we have this year is an increase in cost and pension. There's also -- we have to fill back the bonus system or the compensation. And depreciation is higher at CN because we've increased the capital in the last 2 years. And therefore, obviously, that finds its way into depreciations. But at the same time, we do have much more capacity than we used to have so when these blockade are removed, we should be able to make good use of that through remaining of the year. We've increased dividend 7%. We have a share buyback program. And we have a good solid pipeline of opportunities. I think some of that maybe we can discuss during the Q&A, Chris. So if we go back on the next slide there, Paul?
Paul Butcher
executiveSo back to the basic. And when you see that density map, you also see where our most important book of business is. So definitely, West Coast trade is very key to CN, short term, long term. Definitely, natural resource, mostly from the Canadian Prairies, from the Great Lakes system to the West Coast is very key to CN's future as well as the U.S. Midwest. We're very focused on the consumers, what can we do as an industry or as a railroad to participate even more on the freight nearby by consumers consumptions. And we target the U.S. Midwest and Central Canada from both coasts, in fact, from the 3 coasts, but especially from the West Coast and also on the East, we have an effort that I call the Rupert of the East. And why I call it Rupert of the East? Because I think it's image that people understand that is you go to a port, which has a very small population, Halifax or Québec city. And then you make that port a prime supply chain ship to terminal to rail, you make it rail, mostly ocean operation. And then you want to ship long, heavy train, low-cost train to where people live. In our -- in the case of CN, it's more Central Canada, Southern Ontario and the U.S. Midwest. U.S. -- let's call it the broad U.S. Midwest, Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, maybe all the way down to Memphis in some cases, yes or no. Energy is a big factor. Crude by rail was very strong for CN at some point. And we have the capacity to move as much as 200,000 barrels, so that's going to be another area of opportunity for us short-term and midterm. So maybe on that, I can stop and then we can cover questions that you may have or question from the audience.
Chris Wetherbee
analystGreat. Well, thanks very much for the prepared comments. Let's just talk about sort of the short-term stuff right up front, and think about, particularly -- first the blockages. I don't know if there's any ability to sort of put a time line on maybe getting things cleared out to the potential to operate more seamlessly across the network, but what's happening now from a government intervention perspective? And what are sort of the next steps that hopefully get you clear to run smoothly?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. So we do, as blockade are being put up or taken down, every time we go and quickly get a court injunction. Court injunction, basically, is a legal process to get people off your property, especially when they're in the way of operation. Then we serve these court injunction to the people on site. And then after that, we rely on the provincial police of each of these province to take action to -- ask people to leave. So the issue here is that how that is done? In the case of British Columbia, with the help of the Premier and Mr. Horgan in British Columbia. He got involved and after 5 days, people left the blockade and the law was respected, if you wish. In the Canadian province like Alberta, where we had one in Edmonton. It lasted one day. We had one in Winnipeg. It lasted about one day. It's about whether or not the involvement of province and the feds and what are the police authority feel that it's -- how to go about doing that. The issue in Belleville, which has been going on for 2 weeks is the concern of the federal government as to the ripple effect of what would happen. But truly here, we've reached a point where there's a need for leadership, need for leadership in each province, need for leadership at the federal level. We see that leadership in some of the province, and we need leadership at the federal level because CN customers can no longer really put up with this for very much longer. We can't just have an ad hoc offering plan that we kind of reshuffle every day based on who's coming up unannounced in our track. It's also very unsafe. We don't get a heads up when people do a blockade. It's just the train crew that reports, there's a blockade ahead of them. So there's a lot of good reason why this needs to stop. And -- so how long will it last? I don't know but it has to be a short period of time because we have huge number of customer support to ask for a conclusion and the pain, financial pain for some of the factories that depend much more on us. And now, right now, they're mostly West -- I'm sorry, the port business is slow. And in the Eastern Canada, some of the factories are -- they're in need of raw material in and be able to ship out. So this will have to come to a head fairly shortly.
Chris Wetherbee
analystSo what -- so when we get resolution to the issue, how quickly can the network get back up to speed? And is there going to be any carryover volume that's sort of sitting, waiting? Presumably some stuff that's very urgent, ultimately probably you lose to truck. But I'm guessing there's also some pieces of the business that stays and waits for the service to resume. So how do you think about, sort of, getting the network to where it needs to be? How quickly? And then will there be that sort of catch-up?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveSo definitely. Well, for example, we are in that phase of getting the network back on shape west of the -- West of Belleville. We had, unfortunately, a blockade of 24 hours in Edmonton as part of that. But -- and that -- we've actually moved a lot of locomotive West of Toronto. We're in full gear of putting the network back in shape. We are working hard to deal with the pent-up demand for Prince Rupert, Port of Vancouver. There's a lot of demand that will need to be filled as we regain control of our network container business at all the ports, import and export. Coal export from BC, where the coal mine have a lot of clean coal ready at their mine that they want to ship to Prince Rupert. Propane, we have a propane export terminal in Rupert since last spring. There's a backlog. There's also a pent-up demand for how much propane is scheduled to be in ships in Rupert. So if you look at -- one way to look at that would be the number of ships at anchor in Vancouver and the number of ships at anchor in Rupert, and it typically, grain, coal, probably some potash and some containership. And that's basically the revenue ton-mile that's waiting to be handled. Some of that has to find its way all the way to Montreal. That's not going to be possible at this point. What needs to find its way to Chicago and Toronto, we're working on that right now. And we can't afford to have any other of these 24-hour blockade, surprise blockade, like we had in Edmonton yesterday. So when a network is reopened, you will see the revenue ton-mile in CN ramping up, and that may be a couple of weeks before everything is back to normal.
Chris Wetherbee
analystOkay. Okay. That's helpful. And since you mentioned the West Coast ports, obviously, a topic at the conference over the last couple of days has been the coronavirus and the potential impact on particularly containerized imports, but just general sort of trade. What's your take? Obviously, there's always a lull through Chinese New Year. I think right around now, we begin to see volumes ramp back up as the manufacturing capacity, kind of, would've come online a week or plus or so ago. So how do we think about the impact? And what are you expecting or hearing from your customers, particularly the steamship lines?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes, so to answer that properly, I need to put all the pieces back in motion related to, kind of, where we're at right now. So if we start in China, and we also -- we have a group of people who work for us in China, roughly about 50 people, roughly. And so they've extended the shutdown of the holiday by 1 week. So whether you're working in the factory or working in a freight-forwarding office, like in the case of CN, you had a 1 more week of holidays. And coming back from the holidays, most people actually don't quite work in their office yet. They work from home, which is what -- how we do it for the freight forwarding business. And so the factories will have as many employees as it would have otherwise. So you lost 1 week of production. The production is restart, but it's spotty, depending on which factory, which province and to what rate they're running up. So what we have right now, we have the lull of the usual Chinese New Year. The vessels are coming in, there's a lot of blank sailing vessels. That was to be expected. That lull will last longer, maybe a month longer. It all depends when China really gets back on its feet. And what that lull is done, then obviously, because the supply chain will be empty, both in China and on this side, for those who buy raw material or finished goods from China, there should be a pent-up demand some time in April. So already through that, in the case of CN, because of the work -- the illegal blockade that we have right now will end eventually, and the port of West Coast is quite high. So at this point, the fact that vessel -- there's is less vessels coming in may just be part of how we are able to recover more quickly because we'll have a chance to maybe evacuate the port faster than the stuff is coming in, and there may be a lull in March. And in April, all based on the recovery at which the factory really starts to produce at a good pace, then we'll see that freight coming in. You got to put that also in perspective that in North America, the consumption is still good, right? Whoever makes a product, if it's not China, it may be somebody else, but consumption is there. If you're running out of -- first, you deplete your inventory in Canada and United States. So when you run out of that, it may be that for a quarter, the consumer may have to buy something different, another brand, another different product. As long as they consume and as long as they consume tangible goods, then there's freight to be moved. So I think also, remember, when we had the meltdown of the nuclear plant in Japan, I know it's many years ago, but at that point, and as an example, the world ran out of white pigment for paints for cars. So there was a time there was shortage of white pigment. The consumer kept buying cars, but there was not as many car available with white paint. And I think in the case of freight, that's the same thing is as long as the consumer in United States and Canada has a job, and he feels positive about the economy, and he keeps consuming, he might be consuming something somewhat different if some of these supply chain are disrupted, but it doesn't matter for us. What matters is consumption over here as opposed to where it's coming from.
Chris Wetherbee
analystOkay. And if you were to, sort of, make your best guess about what maybe all of this does to sort of 2020's outlook from an RTM perspective? Is it too early to say because there is opportunity for catch-up, but how do you just sort of broadly think about it?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. So our guidance remains the same that we had put out early this year. It was -- we're only 1.5 months into the year, so there's still lots of time to recover. And I think -- what has happened is -- I'm not so much worried about the coronavirus because that might just mean the displacement from one quarter to another. The blockade, that may be tougher to make it back. So what that needed -- I guess, it consumed a bit of our conservative buffer, if you wish. But because these things are happening early in the year, it still gives us time to use the network. And we have good capacity in the network. And to that point, for example, I'll give you an example of how I feel bullish, for example, in the potential of Prince Rupert as a gateway. We have -- we are in the process right now this week to reshuffle some of our money in our capital plan, to add 2 signings on the rail line between Prince George and Prince Rupert because we feel very confident that there's even a better prospect on the export of natural resource, namely coal and import of container and propane in that corridor that we'll take some of our capital that we were going to deploy somewhere else, and we'll deploy it to Rupert because we see a great future over there.
Chris Wetherbee
analystYes, absolutely. So let's talk a little bit about the pipeline, kind of get out of that sort of lens of the first quarter and the short-term, but think maybe more about the year and maybe even beyond in terms of what you see is interesting. There's a lot of different pieces of it. You mentioned crude by rail, so let's maybe get that one out of the way first. In terms of activity, it seems like there has been some incremental demand. How do you sort of see the year shaping up? And then maybe thinking a little bit more broadly, the sustainability in the context of maybe at some point, pipelines coming online?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. Pipeline -- actually, this whole blockade that we have right now, it's not about CN, it's about pipeline. In that case, it's natural gas pipeline. So pipeline, there's always money to build a pipeline because it's getting them done -- is actually the -- always so much more difficult and lengthy than one would expect or one would think logically, could happen. So crude by rail is a growth opportunity for CN in 2020 and '21. We have a company like Cenovus, who're now ramping up because they now have a much bigger fleet. They actually have the rail equipment to be able to meet their commitment. Commitment, obviously, which is always -- they've always intended to do. We have some other customers also who are very well equipment from a rolling stock and places to load and offload rail cars. In the province of Alberta, they had -- it was a challenge for them to reassign all these contracts from themselves to the private sector, but as this is all done. So it's all taking place right now. And the equipment that was a purchased -- or leased from Trinity railcars will come in as supposed to, and it will be put in hand of that private company. So crude by rail, the environment is that there should be a decent environment for crude by rail this year. Short term, this is where we go back to blockade. Our network is not really working the way it should. And as I said, for one week, there was a ministerial mandate to slow down train of the likes of crude by -- from 50 miles to 25 miles. So obviously, it has a drastic impact. But we're going to go -- we get all these things resolved some time over the next few weeks. The blockade hopefully, next few days and get the network back in shape next few weeks. And then crude by rail will be one of the good story. If you look at that long-term, pipeline takes time to build, and there's a number of crude company also who are now looking at the rail business as a long-term solution for them. And this is where there's going to be some capital investment by a producer of crude into making a different product, a rail product as opposed to a pipeline product. A pipeline product is diluted 30% with diluent in the summertime and 40% diluent in the wintertime when it's very cold. When you do it by rail, you don't really need -- you could get away with only a few percent of diluent as long as your product is loaded hot, and as long as your railcar is coiled and insulated, so you can make it hot at destination. So there's -- this is a process called DRU, to remove the diluent from the product, to take it out of the pipeline spec, make it rail spec. It makes for a safe product, as now -- it's not flammable. Also, you save 20% to 25% of freight because you're not moving diluent. And also, you might get a slight premium on your selling price of that crude because now you're selling, you're already selling heavy crude. Which is really why the refinery in the Gulf, they really want heavy crude. They don't want diluent. So if you can bring that crude directly to the refinery as is, very heavy, you will also not only save on freight and move a product, which is safe, safer but you also probably get a bit of a premium on your selling price. So I think the -- some of the refiners are on the verge of making decisions by year-end to invest some capital, was $500 million or close to $1 billion, to put these units in place to do crude by rail over the long term. And when I say long term, we're talking 10-years type contract.
Chris Wetherbee
analystYes, absolutely. Okay. So the contract on your side could be 10 years? Okay.
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes.
Chris Wetherbee
analystAnd when you think about the DRU, that differential relative to pipeline, meaning the cost to move by rail relative to pipeline really does narrow. Can you talk a little bit about sort of what those economics might look like?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. It does narrow. It may not quite meet the pipeline economics. But at the same time, it also gives diversity in supply chain and a better -- to the seller because now he has a better opportunity to be able to avoid these months where he has to sell some of his crude at distressed price because he can't get pipeline capacity. So when you take these months or these weeks, where pipe -- where crude is sold at a discount FOB back in Edmonton because you can't get in the pipeline. Therefore, you have to bid your price down to be able to get in, there's definitely a return. But we talked about crude -- coal, at least for 2020, is a significant opportunity for CN. I was in Vancouver 2 weeks ago and I met at all of our -- I met the new owner of the coal terminal at Rupert and I also met Conuma and Teck and the Vista group, and they are all very keen in using a coal terminal in Rupert. This will be a growth opportunity for CN in 2020 and '21. It will offset our shrinking coal business in the U.S., which is mostly Illinois based for export. And I think if it started first part of 2020, beyond the first part of 2020, we should be able to show revenue growth in our portfolio on the back of a very strong Western Canada coal, partly some of the decision of Teck and how they manage their flow between Westshore and Neptune, partly Conuma, partly Vista. And also partly the fact that the new owner of the coal terminal in Rupert, maybe is a better operator and he will run this. Their goal is to set record with output, and our goal is to set record for them. That's why I'm actually looking to redeploy some of the capital plan of this year into putting more 2 sidings on the BC north, because I could see that we have a very solid partner here with. I like to invest behind my partners. So if one of our partners is willing to invest into his terminal, whether coal terminal, grain terminal. Like in Vancouver, we had G3, he was putting -- signing up this huge grain terminal this summer or the one in the Fraser River. When we invest, then we feel -- it gives us a lot of confidence to invest behind them in the same supply chain that -- good efficiencies, capacity and obviously, top line growth.
Chris Wetherbee
analystGot it. And how do we think about sort of the ramp-up in coal and the timing of it? Obviously, there's the big Teck contract, but that's not until next year, so how do we think about between now and then?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. So right now, in coal, we're behind. We -- as I said, the BC -- the coal that we move in Northern BC, where we're behind. Our coal mine have more clean coal than we would like to have. So we're into period of time for probably the next couple of months, where we will railroad as hard as we can, and we will also be working hard with the terminal operator for him to also set some record as he's done some capital improvement. Now it's more of an operating game than a commercial game. It's about how well can we operate, how well can a new operator operate, and what kind of record can we set. Because of the construction activities on the site at Neptune, when you have a major project like this, where you actually do construction expansion at the Teck terminal and Neptune at the same time as you operate. Teck might consider to actually make more use of Rupert this year than one would have thought. So even though the Teck game-changer contract is May 2021 business on paper, they might decide as it relates to how they manage the construction site at Neptune to make use of Rupert to some extent, to a bigger extent for a period of time before May 2021. That, we'll see how that shapes out.
Chris Wetherbee
analystOkay. So let's talk maybe a little bit about intermodal in Halifax specifically. So can you give us sort of the latest update in terms of how that process is going to be ramped up over the course of 2020. Do we -- should we get a meaningful contribution from Halifax this year? Or is it really more of a 2021 and beyond kind of story for you?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveIt will happen. I can't tell for with certainty when it will happen in '20 and '21, but it will happen. We -- again, here, we have a new terminal operator, PSA from Singapore. We know these people well. They are a world-class operator of container terminal. They bought it to run it world-class. They bought it because they want the volume to grow. And they bought it also because of CN. So you look at Halifax, the population in Nova Scotia, let's call, it's maybe 1 million people. New Brunswick is not even 1 million people. So the local market is very small. So when you buy a container terminal on the East Coast in one of these very low-density population area? You buy to rail in, right? So their success will depend on CN, and CN success will depend on them. To create a supply chain at a cost and level of service that can rival with New York, New Jersey into the market of the Midwest and the market of Central Canada. So that's really why we're -- the team, Keith's team and Dan's team are putting together right now. And we -- definitely, we will try to be as etiquette as possible with them, commercially or financially in such a way that we can replicate the Rupert of the East, but do that much faster than we did on the West Coast. On the West Coast, Rupert is a great story today, but it took 10 years to get where it is. We'd like to do that much faster because now we have a model that we know works. And so sometime this year, over the next 12 to 15 months, we should be able to attract either bigger ship or attract bigger discharge of existing ship that today would be discharging their midwest cargo in New York and so I'll entice them to discharge some of their midwest cargo in Halifax.
Chris Wetherbee
analystAnd so that would be the market share opportunity, would be more, sort of, the New York, New Jersey market where you see the biggest opportunity for Halifax?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. So Halifax, I don't think Halifax needs taking share out of the city of the Montréal, Quebec market. It could be a little more successful in Southern Ontario. But the bigger prize, we look for a big pie, right? So rather than compete CN, CP all the time, we're looking for how can we increase the size of the pie. And the bigger pie when it comes to consumer consumption and freight derived by the consumer economy that's U.S. Midwest first and Southern Ontario second. So that's where -- that's the role and the goal of Halifax, CN/PSA partnership is all about.
Chris Wetherbee
analystGot it. And since you mentioned sort of the CN, CP dynamic, I guess, I wanted to ask sort of a bigger picture question about how you see the Canadian rail market developing over time? From time to time, we do see contracts move back between them. And I think optically, from an investor standpoint, that at times it is concerning because you feel like it's a little bit of a price dynamic and understanding that we know that is bigger than just that. But if you look out over kind of a 3- to 5-year type window, will there be enough business for both companies to thrive? Or is it really a sort of zero-sum game. How do you see the rail market evolving?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes, it's something that we think about all the time. So to meet, I guess, the ambition of the 2 Northern railroads, and we should not qualify them as only Canadian railroad, especially in case of CN. But to me, the growth ambition of both northern railroads, there needs to be a focus on more than just the Canadian market. The Canadian market is not big enough to meet the aspiration of these 2 Northern railroads. So we need to be much more relevant players in the U.S. Midwest and U.S. market. We need to compete hard with East Coast port, West Coast port. We need to find ways to also create new markets that don't exist today, crude there is as an example, and get into a business that has -- has to do with a contract renewal. So that's why we're very focused, for example, on grain supply chain, port supply chain. When somebody like -- when you have a new owner showing up like PSA in Halifax or the new owner in Rupert, and now they have an ambition of doing things that really increase the size of the pie, we really get engaged on that because long term, it makes so much sense for the overall marketplace, not just CN return on investment, but also how the marketplace can function. Another thing that in order for the 2 northern railroad to meet the ambition, but I think I would argue also for the U.S. railroad, we need to be much better as an industry, competing in intermodal, right? We need to find a way that as maybe coal is becoming less relevant over time, that manufacturing is not a growing space in North America, Canada and U.S., that we become a much more appealing product to move consumer goods. So that's the word of intermodal. So I know you were going to be asking you later about what does the railroad look like 5, 10 years from now.
Chris Wetherbee
analystYes.
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveThe successful railroad over the 5, 10 years from now will have to be excellent at moving intermodal, excellent at competing with truck because that's a huge marketplace, and that's where one of the benefit is doing what you just said, is no longer just a contract renewal, it's about increasing the size of the pie and now competing with a much bigger field where you have less pressure on pricing.
Chris Wetherbee
analystGot it. That makes sense. That's very helpful. And then, I guess, maybe picking up on that theme about the next 5 years, you've talked a lot about technology over the years. And very specifically, last year at your Investor Day, you highlighted a lot of new initiatives that you're working on. When you think about that 5-year view, and obviously, intermodal is a big chunk of that. What will be the pieces of technology that sort of help you get there the fastest? Or what are the sort of the biggest sort of age to that ability to grow?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. So I think if we were to look at the railroad at CN, it's -- let's talk about the one at northernmost CN. And let's say in 5, 10 years, and obviously, maybe more in between 5 to 10, what will the railroad look like. By that time, we should be able to do track inspection fully automated as opposed to with using a human, use the people to fix track but not to inspect track. We should have -- and that's what we put all the -- all kinds of technologies in the boxcars, we put the box cars on a regular train, and basically, the regular train becomes the way you inspect your network. We should be able to automate 100% or just about 100% -- or if we talk 5, 10 years, definitely, 100%, of train inspection. So train would go to portal or other device and be fully inspected by these devices. This year, we're working with a major IT firm to complete writing 100 algorithm of that -- looking at these pictures, high-resolution pictures that we get from this portal. We should get also to the 1-person crew, meaning that you will have partly automated train, especially when it comes to train which are unit train nonhazmats, like an intermodal train, there's really -- no work in between station or grain train, coal train, potash train. We should be able to get to the 1-person crew. We should be able to also see the benefit of the CN strategy on the port, where we really, really work on a very fully integrated, including financially, with a terminal operator to create best-in-class supply chain at the port where you'd have less friction between ship terminal and rail, and that's what we want to create in our joint venture with Hutchison. We have a project to be build the container terminal, highly automated in Québec city. We're 25% partners. They're 75% partners with us. And that terminal, basically has a goal to do 80% of the business in and out of there by rail. Again, Québec city is not a big city. It's -- you don't build it for -- because the market is there, you build it because there's space and that the water is deep enough to bring in a fairly large ship. I think all these things, automation. I think 5 years from now, the whole story of PSR will have done -- ran its course, probably even earlier than that. So people won't be talking of PSR, they'd be talking about something else. And then as I said, I think in 5, 10 years from now, the railroad will be successful. We'll have figured out intermodal. We'll have to figure out a way to capitalize on the GDP, and I think when you look at 5, 10 years, probably merger will be back in. You would think that by that time, CN will be part of a even more North American railroad and would have combined with a U.S. railroad as part of a bigger network. I think right now, a better opportunity is not there for that, but at some point, when you think 10 years out, I think some of that will come back as real possibilities.
Chris Wetherbee
analystYes. That's an interesting comment. When you think about the capital intensity of the business over the course of -- we can maybe start a little bit nearer term and then stretch out a bit longer. Obviously, you have some stuff that you're spending on this year. I think you've talked about CapEx as a percent of revenue coming down in the years beyond. But how do we think about that sort of more broadly?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes, so this year, it's roughly 20% of revenue, more or less. CAD 3 billion. Last 2 years was 25%, so we were playing catch up. We were also a little late starting the PTC at CN. So there was some of that into play as well. I think this year at 20%, and next year, probably in the same range, is where we think that -- we make this decision as we always adapt up or down based on the reality of the moment. But I think that will be in that same range, 20% to 21%, some investment in capacity, some investment in technology, some investment at some point, we get to upgrade our ACP program. So we will have to do that also over time. And then doing a lot of maintenance, right? So you want to run a safe railroad, a reliable railroad, a railroad that can serve the economy? You need to keep doing that all the time. And also at CN, we also need to continue to renew our grain fleet, which is an aging fleet, where we bought 1,000 cars, some of them are in service, some of them are not. We will continue to invest into our grain fleet. Grain is a big long-term opportunity because there's so much space around our network where grain is being grown. And the only way it gets across is by rail, and that has a longterm potential. So we're going to keep investing in our grain business alongside some of our customers like G3 and P&H and others who are also investing into country aggregators as well as at the coast. So I think we view this as we will invest in things that make money, and we have the ROI target to be in the band of 15 to 17. And we think there's opportunity to do that. And so we'll keep increasing dividend. We'll do share buyback as -- depending on how much the CapEx is, but I think CapEx is in the range of what I just mentioned for the next, say, 20 months.
Chris Wetherbee
analystYes, okay. And I wasn't going to let you get off the hook too easy on the merger question. I think it is a 5 to 10-year question. Paul was maybe thinking that I was going to let that one slide by. Chip is up, we're looking at your map right now. Where do you see sort of the better opportunity in the western half of the U.S. or the eastern half of the U.S.? Or is there something else that you think about?
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveYes. I think these are all good. And in the east, you have a huge population. So this is where -- if you put a lot of focus on intermodal, you can connect all the 3 coasts. That would -- the size of population gives you a huge portion. If you're more in the west, it's more about the fact there's no -- there's big space, big space means railroad have the advantage over truck. And there's no river, right? You -- competing with Mississippi River or the Ohio River or the Missouri or the Saint Lawrence River, it's tough for railroad. When you go west, you don't have that, it's basically a rail versus rail and there's not a whole lot in between. It will depend on who, I guess, chemistry, timing, kind of where -- but definitely the opportunity for CN is over time to be a bigger player in United States, and participate a bit more so into the U.S. economy. Right now, we're extremely big in Canada, and I think that's the reason why the rail blockade is such painful to the economy because we are the railroad of Canada, and we matter so much. So for us to really go to next step, it would be United States. Whether East or West? That would depend on what situation, 5, 10 years on how these things line up.
Chris Wetherbee
analystGot it. Okay. That's great. JJ, thank you very much for joining us. We really appreciate your time.
Jean-Jacques Ruest
executiveThank you.
Chris Wetherbee
analystThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Canadian National Railway Company transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Canadian National Railway Company earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.