Cara Therapeutics, Inc. (CARA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 13, 2021
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Jason Gerberry
analystGood day, everybody, and thanks for joining us at the Bank of America Annual Healthcare Conference. My name is Jason Gerberry, I'm one of the biopharma analysts at BofA, and I'm pleased to be introducing our next company presenter, Cara Therapeutics and CEO, Derek Chalmers. So Derek, first off, thanks for joining us at the conference this year.
Derek Chalmers
executiveGood morning, Jason. Thanks for the invitation.
Jason Gerberry
analystGreat. So look, Cara is one of the companies at the forefront of developing anti-itch [Audio Gap] one of the company's best medications and I know you've got some prepared remarks and some slides that you want to reference out of the gates. So maybe I'll hand the mic over to you, and then we can jump into Q&A after that.
Derek Chalmers
executiveOkay. Sounds good, Jason. Yes, just very briefly, just to remind folks, of course, so if you go to Slide #3, 2021 is going to be a pretty defining year for us in terms of our overall mission of developing novel first-in-class therapeutics to treat chronic pruritus. If we look at the upcoming events, we do expect FDA approval of our first NDA for our lead product candidate, which is KORSUVA Injection, which I'm sure we're going to get into a little bit, Jason, here, indicated for the treatment of pruritus associated with chronic kidney disease, specifically in hemodialysis patients. So that NDA is under priority review right now. If approved, we do anticipate U.S. commercial launch in the second half of this year. And we do have commercial license agreements already in place for the U.S. and actually, most major territories ex U.S., which we can also talk about. And then behind our lead product candidate KORSUVA Injection, we have an oral tablet formulation of our lead candidate difelikefalin in development to treat pruritus across a range of clinical populations. And we do aim to get to Phase III registration trials in 2 of those indications by year-end. So clearly, a lot of significant milestones to come here. But just as a reminder, if you move to Slide 4 in the deck here, let me just highlight the significant unmet need with respect to chronic pruritus. So we know that pruritus is a prominent symptom of really high prevalence across a whole range of clinical populations, as indicated here, including in systemic diseases such as chronic kidney disease and chronic liver disease and inflammatory diseases, such as dermatological conditions, and there we're specifically interested in atopic dermatitis, which is an exciting -- fire brigade that's, I'm sorry, interrupting us right now. And also certain neuropathic conditions where we see a high level of pruritus. So the negative impact on quality of life and the increased likelihood of co-morbidities for these patients across all these populations is significant. And when we look at empirical script data as we have here in the U.S., it's in the order of something like 20 million scripts annually for the treatment of pruritus and the vast majority of these are generic corticosteroids or indeed antihistamines, which are generally ineffective or are not appropriate for clinic use. So there really is a significant unmet need here for a novel therapeutic approach for pruritus. So what is our approach being here at Cara? So if you look at Slide #5, we've developed KORSUVA or difelikefalin, which is a first-in-class, and it's really an only in class, highly selective, peripherally active kappa agonist as a novel therapeutic approach to treating pruritus. And we have specific advantages in terms of mechanism of action with KORSUVA as illustrated here. So KORSUVA acts directly on the sensory afferents which innervate the dermis and the epidermis and relay the pruritus. So it's a direct inhibition of the pruritic signal that activates kappa receptors predominantly on C-fibers, downstream from the action of so-called pruritogens, which are really mostly immune molecules, which are released in response to various pathologies. So because we are downstream from these pruritogens, we can inhibit pruritus really regardless of the pathophysiology. And this was, I think, an important aspect of our recent data in atopic dermatitis where we saw a clear significant signal in the mild-to-moderate population. And to this point, we've really been concentrating on systemic disease-related pruritus in CKD patients. And that was really proof that, that idea, that mechanism could be broadly applicable, and that's the first clinical data that really confirms that for us in a different population. So we've got a direct, if you like, neuronal activity with KORSUVA. And it's also well-established that kappa receptors are localized on immune cells as illustrated here. And activation of these kappa receptors inhibits the release of these pruritogenic substances. So it's these 2 complementary mechanisms that direct neuromodulatory effect and the ability to inhibit immune molecule release which underlines the mechanism here and our belief that this should be broadly applicable, really regardless of the initiating pathophysiology. So we flip on to Slide #6 here. This is highlighting our KORSUVA pipeline. And we have 2 distinct formulations in development, an intravenous formulation of difelikefalin KORSUVA Injection, specifically for CKD associated pruritus in hemodialysis patients, as I said earlier, under NDA review, and I'll summarize the commercial arrangements there in a little bit; and then we have Oral KORSUVA, which is a tablet formulation of difelikefalin that we have in development as you see across a range of these clinical populations, including CKD pre-dialysis patients, atopic dermatitis patients, primary biliary cholangitis, and also we're looking at itch of a neuropathic origin specifically and a condition called notalgia paresthetica, and we retain the commercial rights for oral KORSUVA. So we plan to move 2 of these programs that have completed Phase II and CKD to dialysis patients and also in atopic dermatitis patients into registration trials by year-end. But let me just go back to our primary program with KORSUVA Injection on Slide #7 and talk about the opportunity here. So CKD-associated pruritus is really -- it's a serious intractable pruritus in hemodialysis patients. And it occurs with high frequency, is associated with an increased risk of a number of co-morbidities, including excoriations, local infections and actually, in some cases, systemic infections and is highly correlated with decreased quality of life. In the most severe patients, it's also correlated with increased mortality for those patients. And there's nothing yet approved here in the U.S. or indeed in the EU. So the opportunity is significant. Of the 500,000-or-so hemodialysis patients here in the U.S., approximately 60% of those experience some level of pruritus, with 40% to 50% of those at the moderate-to-severe level. And as I said earlier, our NDA is currently under priority review. We have a PDUFA target action date of August 23. And if approved, we do anticipate launching that in the U.S. in the second half of this year. And if we move on to Slide #7, with respect to commercialization here in the U.S., we have an established license agreement with Vifor Pharma in place now since the fourth quarter of last year. And we really see a number of key advantages in this agreement with Vifor. Most importantly, we get to leverage and employ Vifor's already established nephrology-focused infrastructure, including this large sales force they have in place, experienced sales force with established relationships across a range of dialysis organizations from the largest to the independent, and I think that's going to enhance adoption of KORSUVA Injection upon launch. And we've already been working with the Vifor market access teams to enhance our reimbursement efforts for KORSUVA Injection, and we do plan to leverage their existing supply chain agreements to our economic advantage. So some significant advantages I think to employing Vifor here for our U.S. commercial effort. Just to summarize quickly the conditions of the license agreement. Upon signing, we received a payment of $150 million, that was $100 million in cash, $50 million equity investment in Cara's common stock. Upon U.S. regulatory approval, we are eligible to receive an additional $50 million equity investment at a calculated premium to our stock price. Vifor has the exclusive rights to commercialize KORSUVA Injection, specifically on non-Fresenius Medical Care clinics under this last-license agreement, and that's under a Cara 60%, Vifor 40% profit share arrangement. Recall from our original 2018 Vifor Fresenius license agreement that we already have an established 50-50 profit share arrangement in Fresenius clinics in the U.S. And then on top of that, we're also eligible to receive payments of up to $240 million upon achievement of predefined tiers of U.S. net sales. So we think this is a significant agreement, and we do believe this is going to aid in the momentum we can see in KORSUVA Injection launch. Moving on to the next slide. We were also pleased to announce last quarter that the EMA had accepted the marketing authorization application for difelikefalin injection in Europe submitted by Vifor Pharma. That EMA is going to be reviewed under the centralized marketing authorization procedure. And under our 2018 license agreement summarized here with Vifor Fresenius, they'll be responsible for the commercialization in Europe and Cara eligible to receive double-digit royalty payments based on annual net sales and up to $440 million in tiered commercial milestones, all of which are sales related. And we do expect that EMA decision in the second quarter of 2022. And just to complete on the commercial agreements, we already have established agreements for the other major territories with Maruishi and Kissei in Japan and with CKD Pharma in South Korea. So moving on to next slide and upcoming major milestones. So with our NDA under review, we do anticipate, as I said, second half U.S. commercial launch for KORSUVA Injection. We expect our EMA decision on the MAA for difelikefalin injection, second quarter of 2022 with commercial launch thereafter. The oral KORSUVA program having now generated close to Phase II data in both predialysis CKD and atopic dermatitis, we aim to move both of those Phase III programs forward in the second half of this year, certainly by year-end. And we continue to enroll in our other 2 Phase II trials in PBC and neuralgia paresthetica. So finally, just to round this off on where we are, balance sheet-wise, in our final slide here. We're well positioned from a balance sheet perspective to support all of this activity without any need to access the capital markets. We did end the year -- end the quarter, sorry, with a significant amount of cash, almost $230 million, and we've guided that's going to be sufficient to carry us through all of the ongoing oral activity that I've described and into 2023 and that's not giving any effect to the potential milestones I've already mentioned in terms of our commercial agreements or indeed any potential product revenue we should see after KORSUVA Injection U.S. launch. So well positioned from a balance sheet perspective to execute on our plans for Oral KORSUVA development. So I'll stop there, Jason, and hand it back to you for a chat by the fire.
Jason Gerberry
analystGreat. So maybe we'll start with intravenous KORSUVA just because it's the kind of the next important set of milestones in the company story. And I guess I'm wondering, are you surprised in any way that there won't be an AdCom novel mechanism of action in the dialysis setting. We saw a situation at least with another drug, roxadustat, where FDA sort of came in late and said, "Hey, we want an AdCom." Now there could be some company-specific factors to that, hard to speculate, don't want to speculate. But more or less just curious how comfortable you are that, ultimately, there won't be an AdCom.
Derek Chalmers
executiveRight. So as I just pointed out, that could change, right? I went through a mid-cycle review, we have always a full review to come. But today, the indication is no AdCom there. And frankly, looking at our Phase III package here, we had 2 well-designed large Phase III trials that met their both primary and secondary endpoints in terms of safety analysis. I know you've looked at the data. We really didn't see any major issues or anything new from those Phase III programs we haven't seen in previous clinical development programs. And it was a large safety database we established there, over 1,500 exposures overall. So we were very comfortable with the package. And as you say, today, there's no indication of an AdCom. Just to caution that we have one more cycle and review. And as you've indicated, that can change. But to this point, we've certainly had an indication of no AdCom and no major issues with the NDA.
Jason Gerberry
analystRight. Okay. Yes. I mean, in terms of the clock, right? They have to do -- they do have to give you, I think, 55 days notice to prepare for an Advisory Committee and with an August PDUFA, there isn't a lot of time for that. I would -- I'll be stating the obvious.
Derek Chalmers
executiveRight. Exactly. And our late cycle review is coming up at the end of this quarter.
Jason Gerberry
analystYes. Okay.
Derek Chalmers
executiveSo we'll know relatively soon if there is a need for an AdCom.
Jason Gerberry
analystYes. Got it. You've also talked about the scenarios around scheduling being either not scheduled or a lightly scheduled medication. I wouldn't think as a physician-administered drug in the IV setting that, that really matters much. But are these dialysis centers equipped to administer scheduled medications? Would that be in any way a commercial factor? Or do you think it's -- as a schedule IV drug, lightly scheduled, probably wouldn't be much of a factor for the DOs.
Derek Chalmers
executiveYes. So let me just comment on that. If it is scheduled, we think it's most likely to be 5. But our position on this and our submitted data on this and our TDAPA document, which summarizes the [indiscernible] analysis on the likelihood [Technical Difficulty] for the drug, all of those factors do not indicate abusability for KORSUVA Injection. We look at the chemistry, which is obviously very different than possible opioid chemistry. And we look at -- so there's no morphinan structure there at all. We know there's no interaction with any other receptors, including the new receptor, which is responsible for the euphoria and the abusability of opioids, 0 activity of that receptor. We've run all the appropriate advised preclinical studies looking at self-administration, and indeed, physical dependence is not combined to that. We've also run all the clinical required studies to examine abusability. Most importantly, the Human Abuse Liability trial, which we ran a couple of years ago, and we'll be publishing very soon. And there under CSS advice, actually on that [Technical Difficulty], we administered KORSUVA Injection versus a Schedule IV compound, which is pentazocine, which made a lot of sense. It has a mixed pharmacology, it has kappa agonism and a little bit of mu activity. It does have some level of abusability, although not as high as a possible selective mu. And when we look at the data from that trial, we are significantly different than pentazocine, and in fact, very similar most of the endpoints to placebo there. And I should say there, we dosed the drug at the upper dose 30-fold higher than the commercial dose [Technical Difficulty] with the FDA. So based on that data, if the FDA wants to look at scheduling since we look better than a Schedule IV compound, we could envisage maybe they may think of Schedule V, but the issue with that is Schedule V compounds, by definition, should exhibit physical dependency. And in both our preclinical studies and we looked at physical dependency actually in hemodialysis patients post KORSUVA treatment, and there's no evidence of any physical dependency. So that would fall short of the definition, even for a Schedule V compound. So again, our position is it should be non-schedule. But to get to your point on the question, if it was a lower schedule compound, such as Schedule V, this is really the least onerous in terms of record keeping and storage. The feedback we've had from dialysis organizations is that wouldn't be a major issue in dealing with [Technical Difficulty] centers. So that was a long-winded answer to your question, but I want to set it straight that we really don't see the evidence that it should be scheduled. But if it's a 5, that shouldn't be a major issue for dialysis organizations.
Jason Gerberry
analystOkay. This is a question you get a lot, which is around TDAPA and post-TDAPA pricing. And what I'm wondering is some of the pricing constructs that you've talked about for CMS to adjust the bundle to absorb that price level post-TDAPA would be a big step, would be -- we don't have a lot of precedent. And I kind of wonder to what extent is the embrace of the drug during the TDAPA phase going to impact how you think the CMS might treat it post TDAPA because if the volumes are through the roof and the drug is widely successful and all dialysis patients are using it, it's a good thing and a bad thing perhaps in a way, right, because then CMS could see that as a big ticket item. So can you help maybe help how do you handhold investors through this sort of tricky area?
Derek Chalmers
executiveYes. And I do get asked this question a lot. And I'm constantly indicating the case for us as we've been communicating with CMS on reimbursement since our Phase II data. So our team at Cara has a very good relationship and has done a very good job in interacting with CMS. And I think they understand the compound and the advantages of that for hemodialysis patients. And this was the very rationale for the introduction of TDAPA, right, in 2018 and change in the legislation was to encourage innovation in the hemodialysis space where, frankly, had it been capped, no pun intended, but had it been capped in terms of new mechanisms being introduced, they have to increase the standard of care. And so this -- I think our drug is -- I think, probably underscores the rationality of that TDAPA introduction in 2018. So we are automatically full of hopes for TDAPA, and we will be receiving TDAPA reimbursement. You are correct, part of the aspect in terms of assessing post-TDAPA reimbursement will be compound drug usage during that phase, but it's actually a little bit of -- it's a double-edged sword that the agency, CMS, is certainly going to be interested in frequency of use and how broadly applicable the drug is, but that's an indication of therapeutic benefit, which again is something they've designed the whole program for in terms of amending the ESRD bundle. And I think this is such a novel drug that it really does justify increase in the reimbursement, adding new monies to the bundle. And when we look at that from a legislative standpoint and actually examine how they put the legislation together with these various functional groups where they already consider there to be funding for drugs within those groups, KORSUVA doesn't fit within the definition of any of those groups. It's actually easy -- it's an easy fit here in terms of adjusting the bundle. It just doesn't have the definition that would fall within anything that's already in the legislation. So I think there is a strong case that we should see new monies added to the bundle, certainly stronger than the precedent drug, if you want to look at it that way. And I don't know we talked about that a lot but Parsabiv, which actually now has -- which is a completely different therapeutic, is targeting our thyroid hormone dysfunction, has been through TDAPA, was initially reimbursed in the region of $17,000 a year for that drug, which was an intravenous version, really of already available oral calcimimetic, to be frank. So there were alternatives available, did have the advantage of being administered at the point-of-care in the dialysis center. And then, of course, TDAPA, despite the fact there is alternatives available there, which wouldn't be the case with KORSUVA Injection, right? There is no other compounds in development of this class but despite the fact they had generic equivalents available, they still managed to secure post-TDAPA reimbursement. So I think we have a stronger case there. And we'll see where that ends up based on the usage during the TDAPA period.
Jason Gerberry
analystOkay. Maybe in our remaining time, let's shift to Oral KORSUVA. You had some recent Phase II data for atopic dermatitis related itch. And obviously, the stock was reacted in a negative manner, I guess, to the update. This is not dissimilar from when you had the CKD itch trial, and I guess, the market's reaction to primary versus secondary endpoints and arguably Phase IIs are meant to inform Phase III trial designs, but the markets can think it out of themselves a little bit. So maybe kind of stepping back, the smoke's cleared, what do you think maybe the markets were missing in terms of the update? And if you had to look to kind of level set expectations going forward here?
Derek Chalmers
executiveYes. No, I have to say we were disappointed. I mean, it's understandable, but disappointed in the overall market reaction to that Phase II data. And as you say, we really design and implement Phase II trials as a learning process as to make sure we derisk, if you like, our Phase III registration program. So we now are going to enter that trial. We were looking at a heterogeneous population of mild to moderate and moderate to severe. We stratified our data that way. We prespecified we were going to look at those 2 different populations. It's very heterogeneous. And clearly, we view that Phase II data set as a success from a drug development standpoint. We've got the key elements we needed from that Phase II trial. We identified the sensitive patient population, which by the way, is, of course, the majority of atopic derm patients, probably 80% or so fall within the mild-to-moderate subgroup. And for them, there is no alternative systemic pruritus medications that are likely to come forth. DUPIXENT is not approved from mild-to-moderate. Certainly JAK inhibitors are not going to be approved for mild-to-moderate. And so there's a good position in here for the drug overall, which we're pleased about. But we've got the key elements we needed. We identified the sensitive patient population, the mild-to-moderate. We confirmed the active dose range. And again, you referenced CKD oral data, same dose range. We knew the PK. We know where we are in those exposure curves, and that's confirmed that all 3 tablet strengths are active, maybe a slight benefit on the 1 mg as detected on our most sensitive endpoint. So we identified the dose we can carry forward into registration. And we also defined the parameters and the effect size on our registration endpoint, which, in this case, with this indication would be the 4-point responder. So we have all the elements we needed to carry this forward into Phase III. We've already, frankly, been designing now our Phase III protocol we will need for this indication. So it's our goal, and we're planning right now to talk to the FDA on this in the next 2 months. And we still have the goal of initiating this registration trial in mild-to-moderate before the year-end. So yes, it's disappointing. I think the market and you and I have met at the wrong time now and overreact to misses on primary endpoint maybe doesn't reach further in the analysis there. And as we continue to look at that data, and we'll be publishing more of that data at an upcoming [ internal ] meeting, it really solidifies our belief that there's a significant opportunity here in the mild-to-moderate observation. So we'll be pushing forward with that in the coming months with the FDA.
Jason Gerberry
analystCan you remind -- I know a lot of investors think about mild-to-moderate as like a pediatric population with atopic derm. You've run the studies in adults. And how important will it ultimately be to get this into a pediatric patient population to take advantage of the market opportunity?
Derek Chalmers
executiveThere is a significant pediatric component that is mild-to-moderate. So in terms of looking at the overall epidemiology, it's in the range of 5% of adults, I would say, a significant number in the U.S. of atopic dermatitis. And of that 5%, about 80% is mild-to-moderate. If you look at diagnosed mild-to-moderate, the most recent data, it's in the region of 10 million patients adults here in the U.S.A. and this is very significant patient population.
Jason Gerberry
analystOkay. All right. Great. Well, we're up against our time. Derek, I really appreciate taking some time to chat with us and share with us your story and your latest company updates.
Derek Chalmers
executiveJason, great to talk to you and thanks again for the invitation. Have a great afternoon.
Jason Gerberry
analystThanks. You too. Bye now.
Derek Chalmers
executiveBye-bye.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Cara Therapeutics, Inc. transcript — plus 256,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Cara Therapeutics, Inc. earnings transcripts and 256,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.
More tools for stock research
OptionsBell: an unusual options activity scanner that tracks options flow across all US stocks and emails you when large trades appear in Cara Therapeutics, Inc. or any ticker on your watchlist.
StockMarketScan: a stock screener with alerts: 24 pre-built screens refreshed every 5 minutes, watchlists and email notifications. Both offer API and MCP access and fair monthly pricing.