Carvana Co. (CVNA) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 3, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Consumer Discretionary Specialty Retail conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#1

Hi. Good morning, everyone. This is Sharon Zackfia with William Blair & Company. Really happy to have with us from Carvana today, Ernie Garcia, Founder and CEO; and Mike Levin, who heads up Investor Relations. I do need to mention that we have a complete list of research disclosures and potential conflicts of interest at williamblair.com. And a reminder that there is a portal for you to submit questions, I will filter those on to Ernie and Mike as time permits. And I know Mike also has a statement to make before we begin.

Michael Levin

executive
#2

Yes. Thanks, Sharon. Today's discussion may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from some statements. A detailed discussion of the material factors that may cause actual results to differ from forward-looking statements can be found in the Risk Factors section of Carvana's most recent 10-K and 10-Q filed with the SEC. The forward-looking statements and risks in this presentation are based on current expectations as of today, and Carvana assumes no obligation to update or revise them, whether as a result of new developments or otherwise. Thanks.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#3

All right. Thank you, Mike. So Ernie, I wanted to kick off with just kind of touching on the complexity of the business you've built because I think that is something that oftentimes investors don't really recognize that you've built your own proprietary tech stack, you're buying and selling rapidly depreciating items, you have your own logistics network and you also are reconditioning all these vehicles, which are obviously noncommodity items. Each used car is like a snowflake, if you will. Just any perspective on as you were building this business, what was the toughest element to build? And how deep do you think Carvana's competitive moat is at this point?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#4

Sure. Well, actually, you set up that question really well. And I think your last statement of kind of how big does that mean the moat is, it's probably the kind of driver of this question. We generally get it. So what I'll say is, I think, in real life, I think generally, what's hard is doing a combination of things. I think when you zoom into any problem, it's difficult to some degree. But generally, it's the sum of problems you have to solve along the long path that generate kind of the most difficulty. So I think we're going to point out a couple of reconditioning is obviously a massive and difficult problem that you're solving with not a ton of precedent when you're trying to build really kind of like an assembly line structure to recondition cars. I think logistics is a big one. I think customer care, in general, both last-mile logistics and inside advocates is a big one. So I think there's a lot. But I think the easiest way to try to think about that broadly and kind of step back in a way that is maybe satisfying and makes more sense to investors who are a little bit more distant, is just to think about e-commerce in general. And so I'll kind of characterize e-commerce in a way that almost certainly over simplifies it. But I think general e-commerce kind of means that you need to have some product that you're ordering in bulk from some manufacturer. Maybe you're storing your own facility, maybe you're storing at their facility. You need to have a website that you drive customers to. You need to have some ability to take payments, which can generally be just credit card processing. And then you use third-party shipping to deliver to a customer's door and the customer doesn't need to be at their home when the product arrives. So that's kind of like the underlying complexity of e-commerce. Now with that amount of complexity, we've seen a lot of businesses build massive moats, right? When you look at automotive e-commerce, all the things you said are true, you're buying a product that you don't order in bulk, every single one is unique. You have to recondition it. You have to build a new set of processes to recondition it in a way that is scalable. You have to photograph it and merchandise it. And the way that makes sense for customers buying a $10,000 to $70,000 product. Part of that merchandising means that you have to have customers-facing people who answer questions for customers because they want to talk to someone when they're buying something that expensive. You have to handle regulatory compliance and contracting. You have to value customers trade insight on scene. You have to handle financing. You have to do title and registration. You have to ship a car to a customer, and there's not a pre-existing customer-facing logistics network, like there is UPS or FedEx or USPS that works really well. So generally, you have built that. All of the kind of third-party shipping networks were structured to be business-facing where they're kind of maybe delivering 9 cars from a manufacturing plant to a dealer, and it's not time-sensitive. In addition to having to build your own logistics network, you're building a more complicated logistics problem because you need to deliver it to a customer at a time when the customer is physically there. You can't kind of drop off a car on someone's door and then just they get it when they get home that evening. So I think the problem itself is just inherently incredibly complex. And I think that probably the difficulty of a problem, the difficulty of scaling is proportionate to the complexity of whatever problem you're facing. But I also think that the moat that you generate is also proportionate to the difficulty of the problem that you're facing. And so I think that what we've built has been really hard. I know for us, it's been really hard. We've done it. I don't want to say anyone else can't achieve anything, but I think it's been really hard. We worked at it for a long time. We came into this whole thing with deep industry knowledge and a very clear vision. I think we've been pretty lucky to execute pretty well along the path. So I think that what we've built is very difficult to replicate. And I think our job from here is just to keep scaling it.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#5

I know you've been in a position for much of the past 12 months where your demand has really exceeded your ability to supply inventory. So can you talk about the investments you've made in reconditioning and in that process to ramp up inventory to a point where you kind of unlock those sales that I'm sure you've lost some, even though the sales have been phenomenal over the past year? There has to be some that you left on the sidelines.

Ernest Garcia

executive
#6

Sure. So I do think we likely left potentially lots of sales on the sidelines. And I think that when we think about kind of that reconditioning component of the business, there's really 3 parts to it. One, you have to have the physical facilities to manufacture cars. And so that's a real estate problem, that's finding a site, that's negotiating a transaction, that's getting permitting from the city, that's building a location out. Then there's kind of the hiring and staffing to get to a place where you can start to produce cars. And so that's a recruiting problem and a training problem, and kind of moving managers ahead of time to different inspection centers that you know are mobile in the future so that you can build those inspection centers quickly problem. And then you've got kind of just the day-to-day operational execution, which generally speaking, we've done a pretty good job at that. And so that's not something that we bring up too much. But when we talk about the last 18 months going through COVID, the successive waves of COVID were tough there because you had way more callouts than normal. And callouts are disproportionately costly when you're running an assembly line. If you're running kind of cradle-to-grave reconditioning of cars, a single person is going and getting a single car. If you have 10% of people call out, you're going to have 10% less production. When you're running an assembly line, if 10% of people call out, you may have more than 10% loss in production. And so I think going through the last 18 months has been about: one, managing through COVID, which was probably the most difficult part of it; two, when we saw all the extra demand, it was about trying to ramp up staffing and training inside of the inspection centers that we had; and then I think three, trying to get in front of all the demand that we see coming our way. It's been about trying to kind of go out and get more inspection center locations. So that's been a huge focal point for the company over the last 18 months. I think it will be a big focal point for the foreseeable future. And we're -- we've crossed over recently this kind of very important threshold of starting to produce more cars than we're selling. We just kind of crossed over that over the last several months as we announced on our last call. And that's a big deal because that puts you in a spot where you can now start to build inventory and get back to inventory levels that you'd like to have because generally speaking, conversion is proportionate to inventory size, and we've been carrying inventories over the last 18 months that were probably on the order of half of available cars for our customers what we had prior to the pandemic, even though our sales have been a multiple of that -- of the multiple of the sales that we have part of the pandemic. And so that's been a major goal, and we think it's really important, and I think we're making a lot of progress.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#7

And I think if I'm correct here, reconditioning of your IRCs are anticipated to be roughly 20 by the end of next year. And I think today, you have 8, if I'm not mistaken. I might have lost 1 that opened recently, but 8-ish? I mean...

Ernest Garcia

executive
#8

We've got 12 and we're going to open 8.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#9

12 to 8. Sorry, I had them reverse. So 12 to 20. Can you -- I think that will be the greatest ramp in reconditioning we've seen you do in terms of opening new IRCs as a public company. Can you talk about kind of what the financial impact is of that kind of ramp as you open up IRCs, which I would suspect initially at least are not -- are somewhat inefficient?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#10

Sure. So let's start with financial and then maybe we'll go operational. So I think financially, will it be an impact? It will be non-0, but it won't be something that's historically different from what's been embedded in our results already. I believe and these numbers may not be exactly right. But I believe in 2020, we went from 6 to 10. So we opened 4 on a base of 6, which is kind of the same proportionately to opening 8 on a base of 12. So I think that when you kind of look at what's flowed through our financial in the past, it's been something that is similar to what is likely to flow through our financials in the future. So there is an impact there, but I don't think it would be something that would be outsized relative to the past. Now operationally, I think it's -- opening 8 is harder than opening 4, for sure. And I think part of what we've done as a business for the last 8 years is we've tried to continually get better and continually get ourselves to a spot where we can keep growing faster and faster and faster in absolute units and all the things that are required to enable that every single year. So I think that, that's just part of our growth process. And I think this is going to be hard compared to anything we've ever done. I don't think it's hard compared to historical problems that other rapid growing retailers with some physical components to their business have been able to achieve. So we don't think it's a historically difficult problem, but we do think it's a problem that is harder than anything we've done. And so we have to be really focused on it and we are.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#11

We have a question from the audience about basically what are your prospects for buying cars from customers and for the wholesale business becoming far larger in units and a meaningful near-term contributor to EBITDA.

Ernest Garcia

executive
#12

So I mean the way that I like to think about the used car market in general is just that there's 270 million cars in the car park. And given the intersection of customer preferences for switching cars and the difficulty of switching cars, which includes dollar cost, cash frictions and experience frictions, you see customers choose to switch every 6.5 years, and so that drives 40 million transactions. And that's kind of what happens. But all that's happening in those 40 million transactions is a car that's being driven by some customer, goes through this huge mechanism of the automotive retail market to get passed to another customer and that customer pass their car to someone else. And that's kind of all that's happening. And so when you kind of think about it like that [Audio Gap] somewhere else when you make this like hyper-simplified model, which isn't exactly accurate but it's roughly accurate. So when you think about it like that, buying cars from customers and selling cars to customers ends up being part of the same problem, and ends up kind of just kind of collapsing the system further and reducing costs further and requiring fewer third parties, which means less cost, less friction, hopefully, more transactions in the future and better unit economics. So it means all those things. So we're really focused on trying to buy many, many cars from customers and on trying to sell many, many cars to customers. And I think that we think of it as this great race where we want the 2 sides of the business to race each other because the kind of -- the sum of what's possible is very similar on both sides of the equation because of the fact that they're inherently connected by the fact that customers are swapping cars. So we think it's a huge opportunity. We think it's centrally important to what we do. And I think trying to say one side of business going to bigger than the other, I think if one side is bigger than other, we're going to use that as a motivation for the other side to catch up.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#13

Well, one of the elements of the used car business has been very persistent over the 20 years that I've looked at the space has been roughly 1/3 of the transactions occur peer-to-peer. I sell my car to you, we get together on craigslist or whatever. I mean it does feel like for the ease of getting appraisal digitally for vehicles has escalated dramatically over the past few years, do you think there's a potential in the near term to start to bring that 1/3 of the 40 million transactions annually into the retail ecosystem as opposed to being outside of a sphere?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#14

Sure. Well, I mean so what I would say on that one is, generally speaking, yes, could be like a simple answer. But I think why do customers choose to transact with each other. I think it's an expression of a different set of underlying preferences. There's kind of a willingness to do more work myself to save money myself, right? That's kind of like what it is. And so I think peer-to-peer is one high-level classification of a different experience that may appeal to a different set of preferences. But I think what we want to do as a business in general, whether it's in buying cars from customers or selling cars to customers, is we want to collapse the ecosystem as much as we possibly can. We want to reduce costs. We want to improve selection and we want to make it easier. And I think that if we do that, the market, if we're defining it as transactions with dealers associated with them, I think, can expand. And I think the market can also theoretically at least expand beyond that because customers may choose to switch more often as well. So I don't think we view the peer-to-peer market and the franchise dealer market and the independent dealer market, which is sort of like the traditional split of 1/3, 1/3, 1/3. I don't think we view those as clearly distinct markets because there aren't massively distinct customer preferences that underlie those markets that make it so one is accessible and one is not. We just think that we have to build the best solution we possibly can that achieves kind of these very rational preferences that customers have of spending less money and getting a great experience and having a broad selection, having it be easy. And if we do that, we think that we can expand across those boundaries.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#15

So we're getting some questions on how you envision Carvana's business evolving over time. And the questions have to do with marketplace consignment, service or any of those things of interest.

Ernest Garcia

executive
#16

Sure. So let me start with this. Last quarter, we sold about 90,000 units. There's about 40 million transactions per year. That means about $10 million per quarter. That means we are about 0.9% of the market last quarter, right? So the opportunity in front of us when we think about it that way, we're kind of a little less than 1% is still 99% as big as it was on day 0. So I think that one thing we've got to stay really focused on is just the core opportunity of what we're doing right now sitting in front of us is really, really, really, really large, and it's going to be a lot of work because It's not trivial to expand a business that is -- that requires the operational complexity across the chain that our business requires, right? That's the same thing that generates the moat, which is good, makes it hard to expand, which [ all those content ] is bad. And so I think that needs to be our central focus for sure. Now that said, it's not -- it's also true that for customers to transact in cars, you basically need -- you need a customer, you need a transaction platform, you need a vehicle, right? Those are like the 3 fundamental components. And so for us, those things are the brand that we're building, it's the transaction platform of Carvana.com and then it's our underlying supply chain. And all of those are kind of valuable assets that can in theory be separated to some degree. You can kind of unplug one portion and plug in something else. When you do that, there are impacts to customer experience, there are impacts to unit economics, there are impacts to scalability. Oftentimes, those impacts trade off in ways that oppose each other. And so you have to kind of think about what you should be doing. I think that we are aware of that reality and the opportunities that arise from these 3 assets that we've built. And so I think we'll pay close attention to what those things are. But we also need to make sure that we stay really focused on just doing the thing that we know expands to a size that could be extremely large. So I think there's going to be a lot of opportunity, I think, we'll around the edges be testing for sure because we're aware that, that opportunity exists. But I think we have to balance that with just the focus of growth.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#17

So there's also a question on -- I guess I would phrase it as customer engagement. So recognizing you're a young company and the length of the purchase cycle in this category, you may have seen some customers twice, right? But you're not seeing them like Chipotle once a week. So the question is really along the lines of, look, if I bought a car from you, but I'm getting a service by some other dealer, but how do you maintain engagement with me as opposed to me starting to develop that relationship with whoever is servicing my car?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#18

Sure. I think that's a good question, and I think it's a really important question. And I think when you think about kind of the long-term opportunity here, I think getting customers into our ecosystem and kind of keeping them there because we maintain a great relationship and we deliver a great customer experience across everything that we do over time. It is really, really centrally important to achieving our ambitions. So I think that's very important. I think the most important thing that we can do upfront is the most memorable part of buying a car is the experience of buying and getting that car, right? And that is the moment in time that when you think about buying your next car, you're kind of reference point and what you're thinking about is all the times when you've bought cars in the past. And so I think delivering a great experience is the most important thing that we can do there at that moment in time. I do think maintaining a relationship with the customer across their life cycle is also important. And I think there's a number of things that we already do there. Through our financing platform, we maintain contact with our customers through managing our warranty. We maintain contact with our customers. So there are a number of things that we do there. There's undoubtedly more that we can do there as well. Now the sum of what we've done so far, it's very early in seeing repeat customers, because going back to that kind of mental model earlier, if customers are buying a car once every 5 or 6 years, we're only an 8-year-old company. So -- and we had really low sales relative to today in the early years. So you're not seeing that much of the distribution of customers that have kind of got to their second purchase cycle yet. But the early indications there, I think, are very good, and I think we're excited about that. And there's some even kind of earlier indications and just customers swapping another car such as households buying multiple cars from Carvana. And so I think there's -- I think there's some really good signs there, but there's undoubtedly more that we can do over time.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#19

So used car prices have been quite a hot topic this spring. We've actually seen a lot of unusual volatility over the past 18 months. But can you talk about what the escalation in used car prices means for Carvana and how do you position the company for an eventual normalization?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#20

Sure. So this has been a very odd time undoubtedly. And so I think some of the historical patterns that I think remain the most predictive of what will happen over the medium and long term have kind of changed a little bit. So let me start with what I think the patterns are that matter over the medium and long term because I think that, that's the most important thing by a long way for how we manage the business and how an investor thinks about us over time. But generally speaking, there's just -- there's massive ballast in the market in terms of kind of what the gap is between the total revenue that you can get when you sell a car, whether that revenue takes the form of vehicle price or if it takes the form of vehicle price plus F&I income or whatever it is, the total revenue and the underlying cost of acquiring that car in wholesale market. And the balance that kind of ensures that those 2 things stay connected with kind of a rope of relatively consistent length is just that all dealers out there -- I don't want to say all dealers, but the vast majority of dealers have very, very similar processes and cost structures and profit goals. And then they're connected even more deeply by the fact that most dealers don't have cash reserves to take losses over any sustained period of time. And maybe most importantly, but least concretely, there's a very strong culture of not losing money on any given vehicle transaction across all of automotive retail. So generally speaking, what that does is when there's tens of thousands of dealers that have the exact same cost structure and culture and profit goals, it keeps like a really stable gap between those 2 things. Now that kind of is true regardless of the level of prices. If prices are higher or lower, the gap generally remains the same. When we've historically talked a lot about seasonality, what seasonality generally means is its variation in vehicle depreciation rates. Vehicles are depreciating assets, but the rate at which they depreciate on like a daily basis can vary based on the kind of relative balance of supply and demand across time. And I think that, that has led historically to some fluctuations in our GPU. Where like if you average it out across a year, it's -- your connected by this rope, but when you have a whole period where you're holding a car between the moment that you acquired wholesale and the moment that you retail it, that depreciation that occurs during that whole period impacts the margin that you ultimately see. And so I think in these moments of abnormal vehicle price movement, you're effectively seeing like a magnified seasonality is maybe a way to think about it. So it's -- that's undoubtedly going on. I don't think that we should expect that to be persistent. I think that the fundamentals of the balance that exists between the wholesale market and the retail market, I think we should expect to be very persistent. So I think that like when you're thinking about a long period of time, that's what matters when you're thinking about dynamic moments of transition. I think that you can have some expansion in that gap. Historically, as you normalize, you don't see a huge collapse in that gap, right, which is interesting. Now I don't know if that will always be the case. But I think the reason that, that occurs goes back to the fundamental ballast that sits between those 2 markets where there aren't cash reserves and there is a culture of making money. So for example, when we saw something that would kind of maybe look like what an unwinding of this unique time would look like if we go back to the onset of the pandemic in March of 2020, we saw wholesale prices fall dramatically. We didn't see retail prices fall dramatically because you have all these dealers in a position now where I paid a certain price for my car, they're sitting on my inventory line at that price. If I take losses, I got to come out of pocket on my inventory line. If I just leave them there, I don't. And I also have got the same expenses that I've always kind of had. And so you tend to see dealers hold prices flat for a long time. You didn't see retail prices start to drop down until dealers clear through that inventory. So I think historically, when there's less depreciation, you can see some expansion in that gap. When there is more depreciation, I think you either don't see a collapse in that gap or you do, but it historically at least hasn't been as pronounced as the expansion can be. So I don't know. I think we're in a unique time, and it's hard to forecast the future, but those dynamics that I think are at play. And again, most importantly, over the medium or long period of time, it doesn't matter. What matters is kind of what your customer experience is, what your cost structure is and what your variable revenues are compared to the rest of the market. That's what matters because that's what creates your gap versus the rest of the market's gap.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#21

The used car space is so unique in that up until the last 5 years, really the only national brand was CarMax. But certainly over CarMax's time and business, we've seen them be able to take what I call a trust premium on their pricing, right? They have earned consumer trust and what's a untrusted transaction and they basically priced at or above the market. You're in a position now where, obviously, you, too, are a national brand with Carvana. Have you been able to kind of start to get that trust premium in your pricing architecture? And has that been part of the benefit we've seen the GPU over the last several years?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#22

So I like this framework. So let me expand on it a bit and then maybe interpret it in a slightly different way. So like the way that I like to think of brand, brand is customer-facing information. It's like what do I know and feel about this logo is kind of what brand is. And so to me, like I like to decompose that into 3 steps. The first step is, do I know that you exist at all? That's kind of unaided awareness is like the label that we give to that one. The next one is do I actually know what you do? I may know that you're in the car industry, but do I actually know what you do? I go to your website and there's tens of thousands of cars and you deliver them as soon as tomorrow, and there's a 7-day return policy and prices are good and I can get approved for financing. And oh, by the way, I can actually trade in my car. Do I actually understand that all those things exist? Then I think the most important and kind of final step in that is trust, which is tremendously valuable. And I think the value of that is proportionate to the anxiety of the customer feels in their transaction, which I think is high when the price is high. And I think it's high when you're in an industry that traditionally hasn't had a lot of trust. So I think that what we're trying to do when we build brand is we're trying to accumulate a lot in that kind of bucket that has those 3 steps. And then when you do that, I think that, that kind of converse, you can think about that as saying, like, okay, you can charge higher prices because of a particular label, which we'll call trust or you can kind of abstract from that in a slight way and say, what filling up that bucket effectively does that increases demand. And once you have more demand, you have options, right? You can sell more cars at the same price, you can sell the same number of cars at a higher price. And so I think that what we want to do is we want to build that bucket up as quickly as we can, as efficiently as we can. By the way, a huge part of that too is delivering great customer experiences one at a time over and over again and getting the word of mouth that, that kind of drives that out there. And then we want to try to utilize that in a way that is strategically intelligent given the sum of our goals. But I -- what I'll say to answer your question slightly more directly is, if we look at our pricing over the last several years and kind of the -- if we look at the underlying elasticities that customers exhibit on our website, given all the testing that we do, it would have, on average, suggested that we should have raised prices over time if we were optimizing for real-time cash flow. But generally speaking, we have been optimizing for that. We've been optimizing for building a really big high-quality business and delivering great customer experiences, and that's a slightly different thing. It's optimizing for maybe present value to like turn it back into economics, but it's a slightly different thing. And so I think that we've kind of lived in a world where if we were optimizing for real time, we already should have been raising prices. And I think if we get ourselves to a spot where we're building a really, really strong high-quality brand and our bucket is much fuller, I think it's going to give us more options in whatever direction we choose to move in the future.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#23

And I think we have time for one more question. So I wanted to end on CAC, which I know in this industry is really interesting to analyze because you're talking to customers for things they might buy 3 or 5 years from now. So it's not necessarily simultaneously matched in real time. But if we look at the cohort analysis, it looks like Atlanta, which is your oldest market, has kind of bounced around roughly $600 for the last few years. Is that kind of the low-water mark, if you will, on where you think CAC can go for Carvana? Or is there something kind of that's keeping Atlanta in that kind of stable range?

Ernest Garcia

executive
#24

Definitely not the low-water mark that we expect to be able to hit. I think our long-term financial model remains a good estimate of what we're aiming for. And so that long-term financial model has a goal for customer acquisition cost of around 1% to 1.5% of revenue. If we look at Q4 of 2020, which is the last time that we reported of that data, I think Atlanta was around $520. And I think our average revenue per transaction was just shy of $25,000, so it was barely over 2%. So kind of versus our long-term goal range of 1% to 1.5%, which is informed by all kinds of things, we were actually somewhat close to that, but we were also achieving that at a time where we disclosed on our Q4 call that in January, Atlanta ruled this market, had grown year-over-year about 45%. Well, that's a lot, and that's comparing to a pre-pandemic period. That's not comparing to a pandemic period. So there's clearly a lot of investment in brand that is still occurring in our market that we think is still very immature, even though it's our most mature market. And that we've also been running at inventory levels that are well below where we would like to be. So we think there's a lot of relatively simple drivers over time that will push that lower. But we also think that we're close enough to our long-term financial model toward that's not -- that isn't our biggest area of focus is driving leverage in that line item today. Our biggest area of focus is positioning the business to be really large, deliver great customer experiences in the future.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#25

All right. So I want to thank you both, Ernie and Mike, for joining us. We are out of time. And everyone, have a great rest of the week.

Ernest Garcia

executive
#26

Perfect. Thank you.

Sharon Zackfia

analyst
#27

Take care.

Ernest Garcia

executive
#28

Thanks everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Carvana Co. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Carvana Co. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.