Central Asia Metals plc (CAML) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 1, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystIt's Peter Mallin-Jones from the Peel Hunt Mining team. Today, welcoming Gavin Ferrar, CEO of Central Asia Metals to the recording studio. It's good to have you, Gavin. It's been probably too long since we have spoken last.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveYes, we'll do a detailed discussion, Pete. Thanks for having me.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystYou had your interims out this morning, a pretty solid set of numbers with both assets firing again. What was your sort of the biggest thing that you were sort of proudest of to use a sort of choosy expression?
Gavin Ferrar
executiveWell, I think every mining company seeks to maintain stable operations. And one of the things we always are is a price taker. You can't necessarily say what sort of price you're going to get for your product. So in an environment that we've enjoyed over the last 6 months or the 6 months of these interim results, it would have been awful to have a poor operational performance and not take advantage of it, right? So I think that's good. But I think there's a bit more underneath that, particularly in terms of our 2 operations. So Kounrad, as the market has known for a long time and as we've guided lower this year versus last year, has actually done a really good job of producing a similar amount of copper to what it did in H1 last year. In fact, it's slightly up and maintaining a cost base there that generated an 84% EBITDA margin in the face of some pretty strong inflation and currency headwinds. So that's been a fantastic result. And Sasa, I'm particularly proud of as well because we had all sorts of issues with that asset last year, spent a huge amount of time, invested a lot of time, invested a lot of effort in turning that asset around. And finally, we're starting to see some of the fruits of those labors come through in the operational performance where we've got zinc up 5% versus the corresponding period last year and lead up 6%, again, taking advantage of nice zinc prices. It would have been a bit of an own goal really to have a poor production performance given where we are with commodities. So it's generated a lot of money. Revenue is up 46% against the corresponding period. We've got EBITDA margins back above 50%, which is really good. And importantly, the dividend has gone up from H1 last year. So we hit $0.11 this morning to our shareholders, which is right down the middle of our policy range. So 40% of free cash flow translated into $0.11. So I think from a perspective of our sort of CAML shareholders today, I think it compensates them for what's been a fairly choppy period. It also shows intent going forward and also shows the flexibility that we've got with the balance sheet now with good cash generation, some growth to finance and also some capital returns to finance. So overall, a good set.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystAnd that dividend has obviously been a bone of contention over the recent past, the last 2, 3 years as you've been battling with maybe excessive market expectation at points in time against your own policy where you were sort of above it and you brought it back. I'm just wondering, I would like to talk about the deal in a little bit. But in the context of the all-share deal, was there a discussion about the Board of just getting back into the middle of the range to maximize your flexibility in the future? Or was that more just making sure that you were fully in [ scrumps ], and we should take this as a sort of signal that that's where you want to be from now on?
Gavin Ferrar
executiveNo. Look, I think we had the tough decision or the tough discussion on the dividend probably a year ago as a Board, where we decided to trend back towards the policy range. And that wasn't an easy decision to make, but I think we got ourselves into a little bit of a pickle paying outsized dividends and not necessarily getting enough value in the share price for that. So we recognized that, brought the dividend back into policy for 2025. And the discussion now was a little bit more nuanced because there is the transaction pending, as you point out. So I think we're in policy range. We're reflecting the high commodity price environment. We're also giving ourselves a lot of flexibility come the final dividend where if the deal concludes, we'll have a higher share count. And so we did all the math and like, okay, at this point in the dividend range, what would the dividend be at the end of the year? Where does that sit vis-à-vis yields, where does it vis-à-vis the amount of dollars being paid out? Is it still attractive? Is it still offering a meaningful return to our shareholders. So those are the kinds of discussions that we had. And I think we've landed in the right place this time. And then if there's a world where the deal doesn't conclude and we continue with this operational performance in a high commodity price environment, then you'd look at a final dividend in a more traditional sense, maybe a little bit higher. I don't know, you're not supposed to talk about that yet. But I think traditionally, people pay an interim and then the final is probably higher. But it gives us flexibility, I suppose, to move the dividend either way within that policy range depending on whether the deal closes or doesn't.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystYes. And I guess in the...
Gavin Ferrar
executiveIt's also where we are now.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystFrom where you were as at 30 June, we probably had stronger copper prices and stronger zinc prices than perhaps you had anticipated in your budget, which again gives you that extra ability to be generous with the dividends without stressing the payout ratio just because free cash flows will be arguably higher then.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveExactly. I mean the last thing we wanted to do was go outside of policy again, right? And I think it's that discipline to stay now within policy because the policy was designed for a specific reason is that we could flex the size of the dividend up and down depending on where capital was required elsewhere in the business, be it investment into processing plants at Sasa, be it investment into exploration, be it investment into a solar farm in Kazakhstan or in the past, we've had debt repayments to make, right? So it's all been in the context of that. Now we've got a lot of flexibility, not only within the dividend because also we've enjoyed the high commodity prices. We've got a healthy cash balance of just over $97 million. And the balance sheet is clean, just less than $1 million of a drawn overdraft. So if necessary, we could leverage up. I'm not saying we will. But -- so getting back into policy has been really beneficial from that perspective is because we've now got a lot of options.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystYes. Yes. Understood. Switching gears from the sort of the broader corporate angle to sort of the assets and moving to Kazakhstan. I guess the asset has been the sort of linchpin of the sort of steady, stable Central Asian metals over the years of just banging out copper at low cost half after half after half. A while ago now, you started to hint that the recoveries you were seeing were being a bit better than you'd anticipated in the initial test work done way back, probably rising 20 years ago now. What's sort of left for you to do in terms of sort of getting confidence that, that beat so far could lead to a noticeably higher total amount of copper left to recover, and therefore, it's worth you speaking to the government about extending the license beyond 2034.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveI think we're very close to that point now because it has been a consistent outperformance on recoveries. Certainly, the Eastern dumps, I think were originally forecast to actually stop producing 2 years ago, and we still produced over 10% of our copper from there. Western dumps have performed better than expectations as well. And as you know, those are different mineralogically and physically, they're much larger and higher. So the leach times are longer. So we are seeing better copper recoveries out of both the Eastern and Western dumps. The difficulty really is figuring out the timing and the manner of approach to the authorities. So this is a jurisdiction that is very best way to describe it, is it's kind of rigid in the way it operates. So we've got to make sure that we've got our story straight and that we know exactly what the numerical outperformance has been, when it's been, why it's been and then package that up and explain to the government why we believe it's going to go -- for now any rational authority, if you're offering the opportunity of more jobs for longer and more tax revenues for longer, we'd clearly say yes. But we just got to recognize that we're in an environment that is heavily bureaucratic, and we need to get the approach correct. So it's taking a bit of time to formulate that.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystOkay. But the nice thing is in the meantime, it's not like this is a question that you've got to start applying for next year or the year after, there's 6, 7 years.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveNo. In fact, there is a limit on when you can apply for an extension, which is -- memory fails me now, but I think it would be 2031 or 2032 or something. But if we could find a catalyst for us to go to the government with, so if we secured more material that we could put through the plant. Now remember, we're very good at pumping stuff around. We're piping 1,000 cubic meters of solution an hour around the site. So to move that tens of kilometers, if we found something more distal, we could do that. So we have got a team out there looking for those sorts of opportunities. And that would be the ideal catalyst to go to the government and go look, okay, here's a bunch more stuff we want to put through the plant at the same time, we want to extend the license and so on and so forth. So that's kind of what we have been looking for. So far, it hasn't come up with anything, but we do have a few on a couple of things.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystAnd obviously, more broadly within Kazakhstan, the sort of drilling -- well, 2 of the 3 campaigns you're planning through this year have completed. Is it too early to start getting a sense of whether whilst you're hitting mineralization, you're getting a sense that there could be enough to warrant something becoming a project in the fullness of time?
Gavin Ferrar
executiveLook, it's always exciting when geologists hit mineralization because it sort of proves our hypothesis. And we're all guilty of a bit of arm waving when this happens. I'll try and sort of keep it sensible. But what we have at Otyar intercepted is polymetallic mineralization with visible lead and zinc mineralization within it, which does encourage us to drill more, clearly. But we had a -- as you know, we're quite disciplined. So we said, well, here's the budget, go out and drill, bring us the results and then we'll set up the next drill program. So unfortunately, we're probably speaking 3 to 4 weeks before we get those assay results back. So watch the space. That will advise us as to whether or not to put more money into Otyar, drill some more there or if it's not up to scratch, then we'll think carefully about moving on or the geologists probably got another hypothesis to test and we'll do that on its merit. At Yuzhnoe, similar story there, different mineralization as copper moly mineralization that we've intersected. The drill core looks amazing. Again, the proof of the pudding is going to be when the assays come through. And again, but what is encouraging about that is that we've intersected that mineralization along a strike length of over 1 kilometer. That's 1.2 kilometers of strike length that we've mapped out there. And again, that will inform us as to whether or not we continue drilling on that trend or move on to something else. And our team has got a really great track record of churning through assets. If we don't like something, we move on and we get something else. There is a third asset that we've got drill targets lining up on now called Shayandy. We did some geophysical surveys there. Those are now being interpreted and the drill targets are sort of coming to the fore. We'll test those either later this year if we get the window or in the spring next year. But more importantly, Tengiz, that's a really exciting prospect for us because it's right in the Tengiz Basin, which is hosted a lot of very large sediment-hosted copper deposits in Kazakhstan. And we've secured a 3-year option there with an option to extend for a year depending on results. Entry cost is fairly reasonable, very sensible people we're dealing with there. We've already got a 4,600-meter drill program planned to start this year. So the Kazakh exploration after, I guess, 2 to 3 years of a lot of high-level geological research, ground truthing, few disappointments, we've got probably 4 licenses there that are looking fairly interesting.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystOkay. That's good to know. Pulling into Europe, obviously, Sasa you mentioned there's been a lot of work going on, firstly, with the shift in mining technique and the dry stack plant and the paste fill underground, which has been running well for a while now. And then we've had the sort of geological problems of ore bodies not quite looking what you thought was going to be there when you came to mine the stopes. You spent, as you mentioned, a lot of time last year sort of on a soup to nuts review of the operation. We seem to be starting to see the fruits of that come through in the operations. Is there more to come? And is that more thinking about just getting a stable operation that can just sit there churning tonnes month after month after month? Or is it something where we can start to say, well, actually, you can do what you're doing but for 5% less cost than it's taking you at the minute.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveYes. Look, it's been an interesting journey at Sasa because it did present us with a few problems last year. And as you said, geological uncertainty was one of them. And as we're getting deeper into that ore body, it's getting more variable both in terms of geometry and grade. So one of the key areas we focused on in the last 6 to 12 months is really investing in understanding the geology, so that's more drilling. And it's also investing in our -- in training of our staff. So people are being trained up in more stringent grade control methodology in how to operate the software packages that are extremely useful and utilize those to inform the planners and therefore, what the miners do ultimately. So -- and that's not only in training. We've also got a new chief geologist on the ground. We've had a bit of oversight from head office on that front, too. So that's been pretty good. And we are being confronted with fewer geological surprises underground. I mean they're not totally gone away yet, but we're dealing with mother nature here, but things are improving on that front. In terms of the mining method and the efficiencies we've been trying to drive into there, one of the key metrics you can look at in today's announcement is the grades that we've achieved at Sasa for both lead and zinc, which are -- it doesn't look like a lot, but they are marginally up on what they were in the first half of last year. And that's a function of 2 things. It's a function of better planning and getting into the stopes in a more efficient manner and also much more efficient mining with less dilution because as the guys become more familiar with the new mining methods, and we've also employed a couple of drill and blast engineers. We've got another one coming as soon as the work gets approved. And that's helping the miners as well with better drill and blast design, less overbreak, less dilution, more efficient mining ultimately, which leads to higher head grades. So that's starting to come through as well. And on the cost side, you're starting to see it a little bit as well. So if you look at the costs we achieved at Sasa. Now remember, this is in an environment where we are seeing some inflation. We've got currency depreciation with the dollars going down really, which is -- works against us really. We've still managed to reduce the costs period-on-period here by $700,000. And I think if you take the currency out of that, it probably gets close to about $1 million that we save just in terms of mining. And that's really where a lot of the focus was of the studies we were doing. Processing costs have gone up because we -- as you say, we are using the paste stack and the dry-stack tailing, but that was to be expected. And then G&A costs have come down marginally as well as we've -- there's some payroll savings that we've made because we reduced the staff by about 100 people. There's a cost to that as well. So it's going to wait probably see the full effect of that saving coming through in 2027. But overall, I think in the environment that we've had with diesel costs going up, if you strip that out, you strip a couple of other things out, we've made a substantial saving costs on the mining side as well. So that's been a really great result. And our team out at Sasa, a lot of them have really embraced the challenge and try to change things. And there's a couple of sort of some of the detail there is advance rates in lateral development have gone from 2.1-meter average drilling length to about 2.8, we're targeting 3. So that's already a significant improvement. We've reduced inventory, and that's on the balance sheet by about $3 million that frees up some working capital for the business. geology and mine planning and grade control, we've talked about. So to answer your question, we're not stopping here, right? We've got to keep going with -- there's a lot more improvements to go. It was -- in a way, it was a fantastic study because it highlighted probably about 30 or 40 areas of potential improvement for us. It would have been far easier if there was just one if they just, oh, we'll change our explosives. But going through these systematically, methodically and setting structure around each of these targets is still underway. So we do expect to see a little more improvement. And then ultimately, yes, you want to stabilize at that 830,000 tonne run rate and then just churn through at a similar kind of metal production rate that we have today and just out to 2034. Now there is potential for that to change because we've recently had an extension to the license area approved by the government, and we are now working on getting the approvals in place for putting an exploration drive in and getting some drilling done at those deeper levels of the mine. So that will potentially add to the resource. And then ultimately, we're also looking at the satellite ore bodies to see if we can add that into the mining inventory, and that will take that mine beyond 2034. So we are looking to -- I think stabilize is a good word that you use there. That's probably still 6 to 12 months hence we've got more of these improvements in place.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystSo more momentum behind the thing, which is good to hear. Okay. We sort of talked for a while now about the existing operations that probably requires me to put you on the spot a little bit now and ask you about the things you're not really allowed to talk about, which is the deal with Cygnus. How long did it sort of take from sort of first awareness of Cygnus to sort of get to the stage of making the offer, I mean, particularly given the disappointment around Antler.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveWell, actually, it kind of came out of the -- almost directly out of the disappointment around the Antler opportunity that we missed out on last year because one of the advisers we were using sort of had a look at the Antler prospect and thought, well, we've got something similar for you and showed it to us, and we thought that looks quite intrigued by it. There's a little bit more work to be done to get into production than there was in Arizona, but it's still a highly attractive proposition. I don't know if we wouldn't be talking about it if it wasn't. So that would have probably been -- I think they were aware of our PTSD there. So they gave us a monthly sort of calm down after that deal went away. So it would have been September when we were introduced to it. And then we met with the management team when they were over for LME Week in October last year. That was the first contact effectively we had and sort of floated the concept, had a very high-level discussion with their Chairman. And some of this is all about -- are these people you can actually transact with and work with, right? And there was a lot of that kind of sort of assessment going on both sides, I reckon. But they've been super as a management team all the way through since then. So I think we made the right call on that front. It took until, I think it was January this year when our first [ stipends ] took place. So we had a team out there along with a third-party technical adviser that really kicked off the hardcore due diligence that we did. And that took a couple of months and then papering up what we call the Cygnus Scheme Implementation Deed took another couple of months and then we announced it, I think it was 2nd of June. So these things do take long, which is why I was talking to some people earlier today, particularly in junior base metals, these opportunities don't come along often, and they do take a long time to execute. So since that July 2 date, we've been working feverishly to put together the scheme booklet, which is, as you said, restrict a little bit of what I can say, sort of confine ourself to what's in there, but it is 683 pages, so I feel I have a little bit of latitude. And a day later, we came out with the U.K. circular. And those documents are prospectus level disclosure designed to allow the Cygnus shareholders and the CAML shareholders to be fully informed when the votes coming up on that deal. So that's the end of the timetable. If all goes well from here on in, would mean ownership transfers on the 5th of October. So almost a year, I suppose, since we first met with the Cygnus management team.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystYes. And obviously, all of the discussions I've certainly had with investors and you had too is probably focused on the Chibougamau prospect itself. Obviously, Cygnus has got a few lithium assets also just sort of up the road in Canadian terms and then a stack of licenses down in Australia. Is the opportunity for you really just Chibougamau? Or can you see a place for some of the other licenses they've got as building out a longer-term project base for CAML?
Gavin Ferrar
executiveYes. Look, it's fair to say that our due diligence was almost entirely focused on the Chibougamau asset. It's copper gold. It's quite complex. There are 5 deposits there with a central processing plant, which could constitute a sixth deposit. I mean there's still mineralization there and working around getting comfortable with that resource, what the throughput through that facility could be, how much refurbishment we require, what the permitting risks were, all that sort of stuff that you do in DD. And that was the main focus. The lithium and gold prospects are there. We haven't looked at them in any great detail, but we feel we've got time post the deal close to assess these things and then make a decision on whether or not we will progress them ourselves, progress them in JV with someone else or something like that. There are several ways to approach these things. And there's -- if we feel there is intrinsic value in them and we can sort of do an assessment and figure it out, then we'll do that.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystYes. Okay. One of the other things that occurred to me, I'm sure to the team, looking at that plant to be refurbished, the initial studies that Cygnus guys have got would suggest that there's going to be some spare space in that mill. Is it far too early for you as part of the sort of broader deal thing to start saying, well, actually, you know what, we can have a chat with these guys or there's that deposit there that we could bring in to fill some of that space.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveYes. So look, I mean, if you look at the 2022 PEA, there's clearly an opportunity because I think that contemplates an ore sorter, which will mean that plant throughput will be about 680,000 tonnes. I can't remember the exact number now, but the nameplate capacity was 900,000 tonnes in the past, right? So as I said earlier, it's going to take a significant amount of refurbishment. And if we did refurbish it to a standard where there was 900,000 tonnes, then clearly, that would -- there would be an opportunity, right? And I think one of the things that the Cygnus team is trying to convey to its shareholders why this is a good deal is because with CAML's cash flow and balance sheet, it creates a lot of optionality around the transaction where you can look at things in a slightly different way because you've got the luxury of the cash flow underpinning anyway. You're not having to produce a study and then market off the back of that study to raise the capital to build a project that is configured in a certain way. So we will once we -- yes. And if we take ownership, we'll be looking at options and trying to figure out what the most efficient way of getting into production is and what the sweet spot for the throughput will be in that plant and where we get that material because as I said, there's 5 known areas. There's 18 kilometers of strike that have past producers on it. This is a region that's produced over 1 million tonnes of copper and 3.5 million ounces of gold. So it is -- that's one of the attractions is that you've got the near-term development project plus all of this exploration upside. So we can -- as one of our Board Directors says, you can play tunes on it and see which is the best way to approach it. So look, we're in the sort of position that we can -- we will be able to do that going forward. But I think the priority is really going to be continuing with the drilling program that Cygnus is currently undertaking, potentially bolstering the team with some people to accelerate the study work, and we'll be picking up the reins on that PEA that Cygnus is currently conducting. And then as part of that on the side, we'll be looking at various options.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystThen obviously, that's, I think, an updated PEA -- would the idea be that you'd sort of try and do a PEA plus type study. So you take that almost straight into DFS or the more conventional, okay, here's the PEA. Right now, we refine various options in the PFS and then we decide which one of those we take forward into a bankable study.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveThe current sketch is as you described, let's do as much as we can in terms of the PEA and perhaps some sort of optionality studies on the side and then decide whether we can move straight to DFS. And if there is a possibility to do that, we will because one of the attractions here is that you've got that brownfield processing site and you've also got a brownfield tailing site, which should make the permitting time line a little bit sort of easier to navigate. There's still a lot of environmental work to do to produce an ESIA, which is a fundamental part of the thing, and that's probably going to be the kind of critical path sort of from a time perspective because technically, because they own the site, you could, in theory, just start refurbishing the mill tomorrow if you want it. But what you don't want to do is refurbish it to a point and they go, oh, actually, it would have been better if we did this or that thing.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystWell, there's no point refurbishing and having it sitting empty for 1.5 years while you're getting the updated permits for the mines and the...
Gavin Ferrar
executiveSo there's a lot of different ways we can approach this. And I just think where we sit today, we just don't know what those are. But I think what I could say to your listeners is that, again, because we are slightly unique in that we've got a lot of cash flow coming through from Kounrad and Sasa, we have a lot of options about how we would approach the development of Chibougamau.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystAnd obviously, certainly up until the point in which you pull the development trigger, given you have no debt, there's also plenty of discretionary cash flow even within the ability to maintain the dividend payout ratios and so forth. So hence, you've got the ability to slightly accelerate things by throwing a bit more cash at them.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveThat's absolutely possible. Yes. And I think that capital discipline that the dividend puts on us as a management team is, I think, really good in the background as well. So you're going to be quite careful. And in a way, we're going to be in a luxurious position as a company where if the deal goes through, we're going to be sitting at budget time October, November every year going, okay, right. Where are we going to get the best bang for our buck for exploration, for example? Are we going to put it into Kazakhstan? Or are we going to put it into Canada or into Aberdeen or -- so we've got -- yes, we're becoming a little bit more grown up as a mining company now where you've got to make these decisions, allocate capital properly, but always in the background, you're going like we've got a bunch of shareholders out there that we need to look after. And that shareholder base is going to be a bit different as well because we've got another 50% increase in our share count, I suppose, and that's going to be spread across Australia and Canada. So the TSX listing is something we haven't spoken about yet, and that's going to be a fundamental part of this transaction. And that's -- we can be able to market the project given its location to North American investors and so on and so forth. So it's going to be quite a complex sort of capital market structure to manage, but also a capital allocation structure to manage. But I think we're going to sort of stick to our knitting and go like this is a good discipline on management to say you've got to make returns for your shareholders while you're producing cash, but at the same time, you can deploy it and generate a lot of value for the shareholders as well into exploration and into development.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystThat's probably a good time to wrap it up. Thank you very much for coming in and all the best with the rest of the investor roadshow.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveYes, always a pleasure, Pete. And as you say, let's not wait so long this time.
Peter Mallin-Jones
analystAbsolutely. Cheers, Gavin.
Gavin Ferrar
executiveThanks.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Central Asia Metals plc transcript — plus 254,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Central Asia Metals plc earnings transcripts and 254,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.