Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 20, 2020

NASDAQ US Communication Services Media conference_presentation 40 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#1

Good morning, everybody, or good afternoon over -- for those over in Europe. I'm Ben Swinburne, Morgan Stanley's media and cable analyst. Please note that important disclosures, including my personal holdings disclosures and Morgan Stanley disclosures, appear as a handout available -- there is a registration area, but certainly on the Morgan Stanley public website. I need to amend that for the virtual conference. We're excited to welcome back virtually this year, Charter Communications. Chris Winfrey is the CFO, a role he has held since all the way back in 2010. Chris, it's great to see you again. Thanks for being with us this morning.

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#2

Thanks for having this again, and I look forward to be able to do this in person once again.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#3

Yes. This is the one conference everyone really wishes wasn't virtual, so...

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#4

Yes.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#5

So it's been quite a year, Chris, I'm sure you'd agree. You and I have talked through the year about how the business has been impacted and how your company has operated. I'm wondering if you could step back and as you look back at the last 7, 8, 9 months, what have you learned about the business, how your customers reacted, how your employees reacted? And what adjustments have you guys had to make to sort of navigate all this? What could you tell us that maybe we don't know already about COVID and Charter?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#6

Well, I mean, stating the obvious, I think like everybody, from a business and from a managerial capacity, we were -- none of us had ever been through anything like this and all of us were trying to figure out what the impact was going to be to the business. Pretty quickly, though, almost immediately, we realized we had a unique role in that we needed to not only maintain the broadband and video services and communication services that we provided, but we needed to significantly expand them, both for capacity as well as higher customers. And so we pretty quickly moved to take care of our employees, make sure that they were in a good position, both physically as well as even from a compensation standpoint for our frontline workers. And the Charter employees, we embraced our role in this pandemic, and we take a lot of pride in what we've accomplished, and it's gone very well. From a customer and business perspective, we had an operating model that was designed to work in all different types of climates, economic climates, regulatory climates. The reality is, I don't think we had ever anticipated that it would deal with the pandemic, but it did. And all the things that work to make our operating model work inside of those other climates have worked in this environment as well. So as I sit back and think about our customer and our business, our employees have reacted well. We've grown at a much faster rate than we even anticipated to grow. Nobody could have seen how this year was going to develop. But I think net-net, in the end, we're going to be better off surprisingly as we come out the back end, hopefully, as a country and larger.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#7

So when you think about how you operated in 2020 and continue to operate, whether it's across how you position your products, your marketing strategy, billing, customer segmentation, everything, what do you take into the future that is going to help the business operate better that isn't sort of unique to the COVID environment?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#8

Yes. All the attributes -- I talked about our operating strategy, but all the attributes of our operating strategy, really it's been an affirmation of what we're doing. And I think it really gives us confidence and validation that we need to continue to do that, and if anything, do more of it. But if you think through some of the key tenets of that operating strategy, whether it's from continually investing inside of our network and our products, not just for the current generation of usage and products, but for the future, that's paid off well, obviously, with the capacity -- unexpected capacity increases. Or whether it's the employee base making sure that we pay particular attention to having in-house, onshore, high-quality work, well-paid employees who have a career path at Charter, and as a result, pay more attention to the service transactions and result in better customer service. Or the way that we price and package and do that in a way that's attractive and value-driven in the marketplace with products that nobody can replicate. And I don't know that there's a big fundamental change in terms of how we operate going forward other than to instill confidence in us as management. But in the employee, if you think about the employee base, the ability to get behind your operating strategy and what you're doing. And employees see how we operate, the culture that we create, the way we behave inside the community, so do our regulators, and we hope that our shareholders do as well, the consistency with which we go to market. And year in, year out, despite some push from others at different times for us to do more short-term-type activities, we've always resisted that. And I think that's paid off in our operating strategy results now and put us in a position to really grow faster, frankly, over time.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#9

Yes. 2 areas I wanted to focus in on this topic, Chris, one is bad debt. And just I would have thought that would have been a real source of margin pressure this year and it's the opposite. You guys actually flagged it in the other way on the last quarter. I'm curious how you think about that over time? And then also, you really have probably had some customer reluctance to let people into their homes for installation purposes. So as that opens up, what does that mean for the business?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#10

Well, I don't know -- let's talk about bad debt first. Given the economic crisis that's come along with the pandemic and the fact that the subsidies really had stopped, their stimulus had stopped as of July, who would have thought that we would end up with the best payment history for customers that we've ever had despite the economic trends. And so I think what that has demonstrated is now more than ever the important nature and the value of the products and services that we provide. So it wasn't just that the rate of unit growth accelerated, but people's willingness to pay and pay early and pay on time. We've never collected the way that we're collecting right now, and that's starting to return to normal, as you would expect. But I think that was -- you could call it a validation, but honestly, it was a surprise that -- how that behaved. I do think that returns to normal. The other piece you mentioned is digital self-care, and whether that's the self-installation rate. We went from -- at the end of last year, we'd been -- around 35% of our installs were self-install. We were already moving up pretty rapidly inside of Q1 to 50%, but overnight, it essentially went to over 90%, and that's backed off to just over 80%. But I don't know that, that's really going to dramatically change from there. So it caused a pretty fast acceleration to where we ultimately would have targeted to be. And given how well that works and customers' desire to be able to do an installation on their own time and our ability to scale that and to do it well, I don't think that goes backwards. I think we'll continue to get better at it, meaning that you won't have to do a rescue terminal call or whatnot. But I think our digital self-care has permanently been increased along the way. So there are unexpected impacts or accelerations that have come out of this, some of which is going to revert back to normal, bad debt being a good example. And some of that, I don't think it will, digital self-care, being the other.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#11

Okay. Yes, the increase in self-install actually made the Liberty investor slide yesterday. So obviously...

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#12

Good. Somebody had a good installation.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#13

You and Tom on the last earnings call talked about your network strategy, and that was something that I noticed just because you typically aren't -- it's not an emphasis per se in the prepared remarks. I'm wondering if you could talk about DOCSIS versus fiber, not that it's a mutually exclusive conversation. But there's been a lot of talk about fiber builds from your competitors, in fact, AT&T was speaking just before you. We talked to Dexter at Altice yesterday about their fiber plans. Why did you feel a need to emphasize it? And why are you confident that a DOCSIS strategy has long term -- still has a long runway for Charter to stay ahead of the competition when it comes to bandwidth capacity, throughput, et cetera?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#14

Sure. Well, look, one of the points that we wanted to get across in the last earnings call was that we are growing against all competitors in all markets, irrespective of the competitive infrastructure, despite what somebody else may have said otherwise, and our results really demonstrate that when you compare that to the competition. And I guess another point that we wanted to make is that DOCSIS 3.1, which is fully deployed across all of our network at a really low cost of $9 per passing, it has a very long runway with mini tools that continue to expand the capacity that we have within the existing DOCSIS 3.1 platform. We can get to multi-gigabit speeds at 1-gig symmetrical just using DOCSIS 3.1. So it has a long runway for growth. There isn't a looming need for an upgrade to the plant. We are investing in DOCSIS 4.0 separately. So that when the time comes, when there's unique customer demand, when there's products and services and incremental revenue attached to it then at a relatively low cost, we can upgrade the network to DOCSIS 4.0. But there's another pressure to go do that today because of the significant capacity that we already have in DOCSIS 3.1. And to the extent you have 1-gigabit symmetrical multi-gig downstream speeds available, we're fully competitive today. And importantly, that network, it's fully deployed across 52 million homes today. And our path to upgrade is dramatically lower cost than it would be for somebody else to go try to replicate what we have. So fiber or DOCSIS 3.1 or fiber or DOCSIS 4.0, we're technology agnostic. But for the fact that we have planned already today that it works now, works in the future, much of the extension that we do on new build is fiber-to-the-home, but a lot of it's still traditional HFC because of how well it works as well. So it just depends on the circumstance. But there's, I guess, to go back through it, we're competing very well. We're winning at pretty similar growth rates across every single competitor that we have across all types of competitive infrastructure. There's no major looming upgrade that we need to do, and we have a path to upgrade at a lower cost than our competition to the extent that there's a customer demand or new products or new revenue streams that command it.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#15

And without spending the rest of this interview on network terminology and et cetera, can you tell us how you do upstream at 1 gig under DOCSIS? Because I think in this Zoom world we're living in, there's a lot of focus on upstream, particularly when it comes to fiber versus DOCSIS.

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#16

Sure. Well, the vast -- the majority of our plant day is still allocated to traditional video, and that takes the form of HD, SD, MPEG-2. And so you can take down SD, you can convert from MPEG-2 to MPEG-4 relatively easily. You can put more of the HD content into switched digital video. And you can shrink the amount of bandwidth allocation to your video and increase the amount of allocation to your broadband DOCSIS 3.1 platform. And you can aggressively convert your 3.0 modems into 3.1 modem so that they make better utilization of the bandwidth. And all of that gives you tremendous runway for bandwidth, not only on the downstream, but also on the upstream. There's a subsequent move that you can make even inside a DOCSIS 3.1, which could be high split, which really enables you to bring the overall capacity of the network up from 850 megahertz today to 1.2 gigahertz at a relatively easy upgrade. We don't need to do that today. If we did it, it might be targeted. But we have a bunch of tools available to us today at a very low cost to be able to go make those types of moves.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#17

And so I guess it makes sense that if someone wants 1 gig up, you can deliver them a new modem and it could be success-based.

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#18

Correct. And we've been deploying only DOCSIS 3.1 modems for a really long time. So the population of 3.1 modems is already very, very high.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#19

Got you. You mentioned before, footprint expansion, which something that's become much more of a topic in the cable industry over the last year or so, including some very low-density areas. So I'm wondering if you could talk about why it makes sense for Charter to extend their network or your network into areas where the homes per mile is quite low. And is that -- who are you competing with in these markets? Because whenever you hear about footprint expansion, people start to worry you might start competing with other well-capitalized cable companies.

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#20

Yes. Well, look, expanding our footprint, particularly into rural environments, isn't anything new for us. We've been doing it for the past few years. Some of that's been voluntary, and some of it's been as part of the merger conditions that we had, both nationally as well as Upstate New York. And what we've been able to do on the way is we've actually scaled our operations significantly to make this quite the machine. And we've gained a lot of confidence in our ability to go get penetration in what the ultimate penetration curve looks like. So that gives you confidence in your overall ROI. We're investing in areas where the economics and the payback are challenging to begin with for the first operator to come in and there really isn't any ROI for a second operator to come in, which means that you can have a lot of confidence in where your penetration ultimately will land, and we've seen that already. Now, to be fair, the cash-on-cash payback for these projects, it's much longer than what we typically go do. And the IRRs, though, because of your ability to have confidence in the penetration curve, is actually very high. And it's very simple math of where you get to high IRRs, but the cash-on-cash payback is long. And -- but the riskiness of those cash flows is relatively low for the reasons that I've mentioned. And so we think it's attractive investment to make. We think there's a bunch of other tangible and intangible benefits that we're not even baking into our analysis. And so it's an area of focus that we've had for the past couple of years, and we've been hoping and are accelerating those efforts.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#21

Yes. Maybe one more on sort of network and competition. I asked Dexter the same question about 5G. I'm wondering -- I don't think there's much of an argument out in the market that 5G is a better mousetrap than either DOCSIS or fiber, but there is some concern about going after the more price-sensitive customer. My expectation is T-Mobile will announce something loudly around 5G Home in 2021. So I guess my question to you is, do you think about how you price your product and how you segment with an eye towards competitive threats? Or are you so dismissive of the technology and the business case that you think it's something we don't need to worry about?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#22

No. Look, I think if we stood still and we didn't invest in our network and we didn't develop it the way that I was describing, I think the fear that 5G fixed wireless could pick us off in certain areas is real even if it was only at the edge. The reality, though, is that we've always invested in our network. And we've always stated this concept of a wireless threat isn't new. It existed with MMDS, LMDS, 3G, WiFi. WiFi was going to eat our lunch. We are WiFi. And it existed with WiMAX and it existed with 4G. And what happened is we always stayed ahead of the investment cycle and made sure that our network not only had faster speeds, but also it could scale better. And we have, as I mentioned, a 2-way network that's in front of 52 million passings today, and we are committed to continue to invest in our network and stay ahead of the competition. Frankly, competition is good. It's what forces us to continue to make sure that we do invest that way. But I think if we continue to maintain the consistency of what we've done historically, we will be fine. But we are competing against very well capitalized, in many cases, much larger companies than us, and we pay attention to competition, and we need to stay ahead of it. so the things that you mentioned don't take place.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#23

Makes sense. I had not heard of WiMAX in a long time, brings back some memories.

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#24

And probably scars for some, but yes.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#25

One question I know you've gotten a lot, Chris, but I'll take another swing at it. This year, we've seen, our estimates anyway, the broadband industry growth rate almost double from 3% to nearly 6%, and we all know that COVID has helped that growth rate, if not been entirely responsible. But when you think about '21, '22 and kind of pull forward versus normalization, what would be your advice to us and your investors and sort of expectations for the next couple of years, relative to what we saw in 2020?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#26

Yes. I'll start off with our competitive nature. You mentioned 6%, just for the record Charter is at 8.8% internet growth year-over-year, and we were much higher than the industry even prior to this, and we expect to be in the future. Now that competitive nature aside, 8.8% is a pretty high growth rate. And we did benefit from the need for our products, which I think has a permanent impact on our growth rate over time because it's demonstrated the value and the need for what we provide. That being said, before we get over our skis, I don't think that in 2021, 2020, unit net adds is going to be the right comparison. I think 2019 is probably more of a fair comparable. It doesn't look more like 2019 or does it look like what we would have expected this year of a slow acceleration on that, I don't know. But I think it's -- to set the table right, it's -- 2020 unit adds isn't the right comparison, it really should be 2019. As it relates to the P&L, I mean if you think back to 2020, all of the unique items that are flowing through our P&L this year, and it's not going to be all inclusive, but we had a significant wage increase for all of our hourly workers. At the same time, we had an artificially depressed amount of service transactions because people didn't want service in their home. They didn't want to -- they weren't moving. There were -- none of them were upgrades or downgrades. And so we had stasis in the marketplace, which lowered our cost to serve on that aspect. We had bad debt, as we talked about before, growing just the opposite direction. That's, I think, temporary in nature. We had sports rights cost, which get amortized in many cases based on the number of games, and we had a lot less games this year. And so some of that will bleed into next year, not only you have a normal year, but you have due to the NBA season, some of those games flip into next year. We have medical costs flipping left and right between different quarters. We have political advertising inside this year. So our finance group and financial planning analysis group, we have a lot of work in front of us to go make sure that we clearly lay that out for shareholders, so that they can see all the puts and takes that existed in 2020. And to a lesser extent, some of the puts and takes that will still exist in 2021, so that we can all take a look at it and say, okay, now I understand what the normalized growth rate is. And put it out in a way, which we've started to do through these COVID schedules, that investors can take their own view as to what they think is recurring and what's not and to try to get to a better underlying growth rate. We've always taken the view that we'd rather put everything on the table and be transparent with it, and it's upon us to continue to do that. So we'll work through that during the course of next year. I think next year will still be a fine growth rate. But between the quarters, if you think what happened in Q2 of this year, if you think about political advertising, if you think about sports rights, it's going to be a little wild. But I think we'll still have a good year next year. It's just going to be -- there will be some volatility along the way.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#27

Yes. Yes. That all makes sense. Yes, I can't remember what slide number it is, 19 I'm guessing. I can't remember from the investor deck. It's something like...

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#28

19. It's sad that we both remember it. But it's 19 all the way in the back, and it has the multi-quarter view, and we'll be updating that in Q4. And we'll also -- to the extent we find stuff along the way that says, oh, we should have highlighted this as well, we'll load that backwards, just to make sure that people have the benefit of everything that we're thinking through along the way as well.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#29

Yes. Let me ask you about the video business, which obviously gets less emphasis these days. But people still consume not just linear video, but more and more content every day, particularly in COVID. What's the product road map and sort of strategy for Charter from here? Because we've started to see certainly Comcast, I think, pivot their model quite a bit publicly and in their business. I'm just wondering, as you think about how important video is or not to Charter's go-to-market, what's the plan and how do you see that business evolving?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#30

Yes. Well, for years, we've said that whether we're a small net loser or a small net gainer, it's not going to impact our financials or our cash flow in any material way. That remains the case. But we've also said that maintaining a competitive video product was really important for our internet additions and our internet retention. And any type of connectivity service that we provide. And I think the past year has really proved that out. We had a significantly higher amount of internet net adds and a significantly higher amount of internet sales during the beginning of the pandemic. And what that did is it pulled through a significantly higher number of video -- we actually have positive video net adds. Does that continue? Probably not. It was a unique point in time, but it doesn't change. It actually proves what we've been saying all along that having a competitive video product helps out your internet. And when you have good internet and you have good video, they're sold together, and it flows through. So in terms of product road map, we will continue to invest to make sure that we have a modern user interface across all of our different platforms, continue to upgrade the set-top box platform that we have that's important for many of our customers and will be for some time. But we also have made our video product, the Spectrum Guide, available on essentially all third -- major third-party devices. And our content is available in a linear and on-demand fashion inside the home, outside the home across all these different devices. We will be developing, at some point, our own IP platform to be -- continue to be an aggregator of all content, and there will be more to come on that over time. The integration of SVOD and even DTC platforms into our Spectrum Guide, you'll see more and more of that already. Much of that exists, and it will continue to expand. So we'll move with the marketplace, I guess, is what I'm saying. And we'll make sure that we're in a position to continue to have a competitive video product. I still believe that cable as an industry has the best set of assets to continue to be the best aggregator of video content. It's always been our role with a 2-way plant. The existing distribution that we have, the connectivity relationships that we have, I still think we're going to be a major player in the video space. And I think the video product, whether it gains or loses is irrelevant. What matters is that we have a competitive video product that really sustains the connectivity relationship growth rate that we have overall.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#31

Makes sense. And this IP platform you're working on, is that a hardware-based in-footprint approach that...

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#32

It's both. The software version exists today and it's robust. And so yes, both.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#33

Got it. Okay. I'll let you fill us in on that over time when it makes sense. Let's shift over to wireless. You guys have talked obviously a lot about accelerating that business, which is happening. You also gave us some guidepost on profitability. But I'm wondering when you think about the wireless business case, should we be thinking about that more as a churn reducer in broadband or enhancing the value of broadband? Or a stand-alone NPV positive, substantial NPV positive business in the context of Charter over time?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#34

I think investors can think about it as both. And we've shown the stand-alone profitability of the platform so people could get comfortable with the J-curve of our growth cycle. And now what you see is that we've crossed the point where we have enough scale such that if you didn't have sales and marketing cost, the business is profitable on a stand-alone basis. And obviously, subject to any material acceleration in growth, but it's clearly going to continue to get better and better as we get larger and your existing business can cover the sales and marketing cost of new acquisition. So I think there's a significant NPV on a stand-alone basis. And I think it's fine for investors to look at it and think about it partially that way. It's not how we think about it inside the business. We really think about mobile as an extension of our internet product, and we think of it as just another attribute of our connectivity service. We think about it as the way that internet is going anyway from inside your household, moving from Ethernet, 10, 15 years ago to WiFi in the kitchen, to now Wi-Fi out on your patio, to continuously moving with you in a nomadic fashion. And we have an MVNO that enables us to go provide that extended internet connectivity services. We have the internet and enhanced Wi-Fi along the way underway to continue to enable that expansion. And we have CBRS as well to be able to fill in some of those pockets that really is a cost reducer along the way at a pace that we determine. So I think you can hold your head around both thoughts, which is that it is critical to our connectivity services, both at point-of-sale because we can create value for customers as well as at retention. We can use this as a significant retention tool, which we're actually doing. But also that if an investor wants to satisfy or check the box, then it has stand-alone profitability, you can think about that, too. But the latter is not how we think about it inside the company.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#35

And would you attribute any of the 8.8%, we'll round to 9%, broadband customer growth to wireless bundling and the churn benefits yet or too small?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#36

Yes. Yes. How much? I don't know. I think there's more art than science in that. But yes, I think it's -- look, if you can have a conversation with a customer and tell them you can save them $800 a year on their mobile bill and that you can deliver to them a product that is faster than anything else in the marketplace on their mobile handset because of the way that it integrates with our WiFi and it's cheaper, that's a pretty attractive way to not only sell internet. But if a customer calls in saying they want to reduce their bill and they don't have mobile from us today, it's an easy way to pivot. Say, I understand you want to take down your video bill or you want to take down your internet bill, how about I just save you $800 per year on your mobile bill. And you pivot the conversation and kneed that conversation instead of reducing a PSU or reducing the level of service to actually increasing PSUs and increasing the revenue per the household, but creating a lot of value for the customer a little the way.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#37

Yes. We were, I think, just starting to see the inflection in your commercial business as you had repriced that base right when COVID hit, maybe a few quarter -- a quarter or so after. But it's starting to pick back up again. Is wireless a part of that strategy and a driver of that business over time? Are you selling actively into the SMB space, wireless services?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#38

We are into SMB. I think today, you can think about the SMB mobile product really is an extension of the residential product, which is I can provide you faster connectivity and save you money, more reliable service and save you money and faster connectivity. And so you're essentially talking about the same type of connectivity in handset business that we have in retail with similar economics and similar rationale for being in that business. And I think it will grow. I think we can add value there, and we're getting better and better at selling into that space every day. On enterprise, I think we have bigger thoughts, which is it's not just about a mobile handset relationship, which an enterprise can really get from just about anywhere. But are there things that we could do, given the ubiquitous nature of our fiber network inside of our footprint, our ability to play nationally in enterprise, are there things that we can do in a combination with our WiFi, with our CBRS and maybe in combination with another MNO's spectrum to be able to provide unique 5G-based services inside of buildings, manufacturing and whatnot? And those are early, early thoughts. So I don't have anything concrete at all to -- that I could even tell you about today. But I think the enterprise space is different, and it could end up being a playground, and we could end up being a really attractive partner for somebody, given the amount of fiber-deployed network that we have. And we could use those type of mobile applications to really drive connectivity at enterprise. And to the extent it was successful, could you see some of that move into the SMB space over time? Potentially, that's been the case with other products. But there's a very different whiteboard that exists for enterprise and it would take a couple of years to play out. But I find this space interesting, and I think there's some things that we can do in cooperation with others.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#39

Okay. Let me ask you about the CBRS investment. What did you buy? And what is the timing to put that asset to work in the business?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#40

Yes. We bought many what's called PoW licenses to CBRS, really about 2 for every of our top 100 counties on average. And together with those PoW licenses, we'll have use of -- utilization of the unlicensed spectrum that goes along with CBRS as well. The licenses were sold on a county-by-county basis, which made it uniquely well positioned for cable. And it would require -- because of its low power nature requires really on-strand deployment of the CBRS, which was also uniquely situated for us in terms of the cost to deploy. It's much lower for us than anybody else. So we found it as a unique -- really, really unique set of spectrum assets that really was, in our minds, intended for us. And that doesn't mean, though, to be clear, just because we bought spectrum that we're going to run out and build a network just to build a network. There's no looming capital expenditure cycle that we're going to try to get this done inside of a year, 2 years or even 3 years. We are going to deploy CBRS really based on a financial model that says, can I get an offload return that covers in a very quick fashion the cost to deploy that spectrum? And that's going to be our rationale for deploying CBRS. I don't expect any material deployment next year. There will be learning and scaling along the way. And to the extent that we're deploying it, we will, over the following years, it will really be tied exclusively to a cost reduction initiative to offload traffic from our MVNO much the same way that we do with WiFi today.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#41

Okay. And I'm guessing you probably can't say much about C-Band, but you talked about CBRS and how unique it is. C-Band has much larger blocks. Is that the way we should be thinking about in comparing the 2 opportunities?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#42

Because of the quiet period, I really can't say anything about C-Band. Other than, generally, we've always talked about being very disciplined in all of our approach to investment.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#43

Makes sense. I thought that was the case. We've got about 5 minutes left, Chris. Maybe just to wrap up on capital spending, capital intensity and capital allocation. A question you've gotten over the years, I'm sure you love answering it, but how do we think about capital intensity in the business? Now that you guys are past the major integration, it feels like this sort of -- where this could go has narrowed. But how should we think about it over time?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#44

Well, whenever somebody asked me about capital intensity over time, I usually rhetorically say, well, what do you expect as a growth rate? And so much of what we do in our capital expenditure is a function of how fast we're growing in the current year and what investments we're making for future growth. So could we dramatically drop our CapEx in any given year? Absolutely. We wouldn't grow as much. And so that's never going to be our objective. And to the extent that we have interesting ROI-positive projects in front of us, we've actually been very clear with the capital markets that it is our #1 protocol for use of excess free cash flow is to go reinvest in the business because of the higher ROIs and the ability that gives you to do more M&A or more buybacks by having a compounding growth engine that sits behind you. So we're not going to run away from investment opportunities that could cause us to temporarily tick up in our capital expenditure, either in dollars or as a percentage of revenue. That's never been us and it won't be. That being said, our core cable capital intensity, even with high growth rates, has been declining, and I expect our core cable capital expenditure intensity to continue to decline. Am I saying that certain ROI-positive projects won't temporarily knock us off of that path? No. Things like the pace of rural build, the pace of the CBRS deployment, if there were attractive ways to go monetize accelerated DOCSIS upgrades along the way so that you could generate new revenue streams. Would we do that? Yes. Would we be worried about a temporary tick up inside of our capital intensity? We would not. What we would do is what we've always done around capital expenditures is we have these type of programs that are isolated and have a certain life attached to them. We would isolate them for investors so they can have full transparency on what we're spending, not only today, but they can really go back and validate the type of returns that we've generated for those expenditures. And so we'll continue to do that and make sure that it's clear to investors that we are doing things that get an ROI. But generally, as a rule, I expect -- even with high growth, I expect our core cable capital intensity is declining. And there could be some ROI-positive things that we'll have to explain to investors along the way why we're doing what we're doing at the pace we're doing. But generally, if you have positive ROI projects, you want to get it done as quickly as you can so that you can grow faster earlier. That's always been our approach and that hasn't changed.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#45

And you mentioned that you didn't see CBRS spending or wireless as a big investment area in '21. Is there anything you would highlight to us that we should be thinking about?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#46

Yes. Wireless, we're not done with our retail store upgrades. COVID delayed some of that activity taking place. And so a combination of some of that pushing into next year as well as the success of how that's worked. Most of our sales aren't actually taking place through retail, but it's an important channel, and we've been pretty successful in those upgrades. So I think that will actually continue into the next year on the wireless side. As for the rest of the capital expenditure, I don't see any major shifts in mix. If you go down the line items, I hope we're spending a lot on CPE, particularly around internet routers and advanced WiFi deployment because that would suggest something on our growth. The scalable infrastructure side, we're going to continue to segment the network and accommodate higher usages of traffic as well as higher numbers of customers. Our line extensions, both for enterprise as well as for rural build, we'll continue to actually grow probably in that category. And so generally, I don't see any major shift in mix as we look out to next year. Now we're in the middle of a budget exercise right now and typically we'll come out -- and we don't ever give guidance, but we'll give some color on how we're thinking about our investment profile. We'll do that on our Q4 call. But as I sit here today, there will be some puts and takes, but I don't see a major shift in the way that we're allocating capital next year relative to even the unique year of 2020.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#47

And have you sized, Chris, the edge-out kind of rural opportunity either -- I think in your RDOF press release, there was something around just a long-term capital spend plan. But as we think about the next couple of years of the footprint opportunity, how big that is?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#48

Our 8-K really was a broader rural build out plan that indicated that at the time, we intended to apply for RDOF. And because we're in the RDOF quiet period right now, I'm really not going to be able to say any more until that whole process is formally complete. So I want to respect that and certainly respect the FCC and obey the guidelines. And at the point where we can say more, we will, as we always have done. But in the meantime, we're going to have to look back and rely on what was said in the 8-K, and that's all we can say.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#49

Okay. Fair enough. Chris, we're basically out of time. Anything you want to wrap up with?

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#50

No, I'm -- well, yes, I think the business has performed extremely well. And I think the operating strategy has been validated. And I do think it's one of the reasons that we've consistently been the top grower in our industry, and I think we're in a great position. Did we pull forward a little bit of demand? Did we delay a little bit of churn? Maybe. But we're going to end 2020 -- is Q4 on last Q4, I don't know exactly how that's going to look. What we've said is that our quarterly net adds, our quarterly performance isn't what matters. What really matters is the totality of the year and where are we going. And if you look at 2020, no matter what happens over the last 2 months of the Q4, we're going to end 2020 with a much higher amount of customers than any of us ever expected. It's permanent. And I think our growth rate as a result of the way that we've behaved in the marketplace and the way that our employees have helped us put this together means that we're going to have a very good growth rate for many, many years to come. And all the things that we've talked about here bode well for Charter and for its investors.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#51

Well, that's a great note to wrap on. Thank you, Chris. Thank you, everybody, for joining us. And for those here in The States, have a great Thanksgiving week. Chris, thanks so much.

Christopher Winfrey

executive
#52

Take care. Do the same. See you, Ben.

Benjamin Swinburne

analyst
#53

Okay.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Charter Communications, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Charter Communications, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.