Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 7, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Energy Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels earnings 48 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Q1 2020 Comstock Resources Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Jay Allison, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead.

Miles Allison

executive
#2

Tina, thank you, and good morning, everyone. We know it's a crowded morning. The docket is crowded, lots of earnings reports came out last night. And this is a prime time slot. So those of you that are participating right now, thank you. I have a few comments before we start the formal presentation. The last 60 days has stress test every business in the world, especially the oil and gas business. We, as an industry, are managing the ripple effect of the initial increased oil supply from the Saudi Arabia-Russian oil feud, which has been dialed back as of this month, coupled with the coronavirus pandemic that has reduced the demand for oil by 25% to 30%. Fortunately, however, Comstock is 98% natural gas, has an industry-leading low-cost structure in the Haynesville, has industry-leading high margins, has hedged almost half the production expected for the next 12 months, and has meaningful free cash flow. Since we are 98% natural gas, we have already become a beneficiary of the corrected oil market as we see associated gas being shut in and a collapse in the rig count occurring. Roland Burns, our CFO, will report our strong first quarter results; and Dan Harrison, our COO, will tell you why our costs are down and should continue to be lower in the months ahead. Our numbers are solid because of our consistent stellar well results and the location of our natural gas fields being in proximity to the Gulf Coast market. Here is our report from the 270 employees at Comstock that made this quarter successful, even in a very difficult energy environment. Welcome to the Comstock Resources First Quarter 2020 Financial and Operating Results Conference Call. Today, we'll review our first quarter 2020 earnings and drilling results. You can view a slide presentation during or after this call by going to our website at www.comstockresources.com and downloading the quarterly results presentation. There you'll find a presentation entitled First Quarter 2020 results. I am Jay Allison, Chief Executive Officer of Comstock. And with me is Roland Burns, our President and Chief Financial Officer; Dan Harrison, our Chief Operating Officer; and Ron Mills, our VP of Finance and Investor Relations. Please refer to Slide 2 in our presentation and note that our discussions today will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of securities laws. While we believe the expectations of such statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Now if you'll turn over to Slide 3. On Slide 3, we cover some of the highlights for the first quarter. Most importantly, our natural gas operations in North Louisana and East Texas have not been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 virus pandemic that has disrupted all of our lives. We've been able to maintain our normal operating activity and adjusted our processes to create a safe work environment for our employees and contractors. The collapse in oil prices will impact our oil properties in the Bakken and Eagle Ford, but have inversely had a positive impact on natural gas prices. We feel that the reduced activity in both gas- and oil-directed drilling will create a healthy balance between supply and demand for natural gas. The one statement that has remained very consistent is that our Haynesville/Bossier shale drilling program continues to deliver strong results. Comstock and Covey Park have drilled and completed a combined 237 operated wells since 2015, which had an average IP rate of 23 million cubic day (sic) [ feet ] equivalent per day. We have drilled more than any other operator in the play during this period. Our drilling activity drove the 27% year-over-year growth from our Haynesville/Bossier property since the first quarter of last year on a combined basis. We have also been driving down our well cost in the same period. The first quarter well costs per lateral foot are 15% lower than what we averaged in the first quarter of 2019. Recent well costs have improved even further. And we expect our well cost to average $1,100 per completed lateral foot in 2020. The strong natural gas production growth this quarter was offset by weak natural gas prices in the first quarter. For the quarter, we reported oil and gas sales of $271 million, which is a $105 million increase over first quarter '19. We had adjusted EBITDAX of $202 million, up 108% over first quarter of 2019. We also reported operating cash flow of $156 million, up 120% over first quarter '19 or $0.55 per share, and adjusted net income for the quarter of $24 million or $0.12 per share. Now I'll have Roland cover the financial results in more detail. Roland?

Roland Burns

executive
#3

Thanks, Jay. On Slide 4, we show the combined Comstock and Covey Park production from the Haynesville/Bossier shale since 2016. In the first quarter of this year, production from our Haynesville/Bossier wells is up 27% to almost 1.3 billion cubic feet per day as compared to about 1 billion cubic feet per day, Comstock and Covey Park combined produced in the first quarter of 2019. Production grew only slightly from the fourth quarter of last year due to the fact that our first quarter completions came online fairly late in the quarter, and we had a higher than normal shut-in rate this quarter, as we'll go over in a minute. We did put 11.5 net wells on production during the quarter. In the second quarter, we see the rate of our Haynesville/Bossier properties really staying relatively flat with only about 4.5 net wells coming on production during the second quarter. Our completion activity is expected to pick back up in the third quarter, and we'll see some growth in the third quarter and fourth quarter of this year. Slide 5 recaps the production we had shut in for the quarter, and this was -- production was shut in principally for offset frac activity, either by us or by offset operators. Our first quarter shut-in volumes increased to 5% as compared to only 2% in the fourth quarter of last year. Offset operating activity as well as our own completion activity, caused us to shut-in production in some of our best producing areas. Given the lower number of completions planned during the second quarter and our planned activity level going forward this year, we do expect the shut-in volumes to return to the 2% to 3% level over the rest of the year. On Slide 6, we summarize our financial results for the first quarter of 2020. Our production for the first quarter totaled 126 Bcfe, including 454,000 barrels of oil. This is 230% higher than production in the first quarter of 2019. Our oil and gas sales, including our realized hedging gains were $271 million, 105% higher than the same quarter in 2019. Oil prices in the first quarter averaged $46.31, and our realized gas price, including our hedging gains averaged $2.04 per Mcfe. Our natural gas price realization was down 29% in the first quarter, which offset some of the substantial production growth we had. Adjusted EBITDAX came in at $202 million, that's 108% increase over 2019. Operating cash flow was $156 million, 120% increase over 2019. For the quarter, we reported net income of $30 million or $0.15 per fully diluted share. But adjusted net income, which would exclude unusual items, the largest being the unrealized gain on our derivatives, was $23.6 million or $0.12 per diluted share. Slide 7 summarizes our current hedges that we have in place for our oil and gas production. For this year, we have 619 billion cubic feet per day of our gas and 3,450 barrels of our oil hedged. Since we reported earnings last, we've added 35 million cubic feet per day of gas swaps, about 50 million per day of gas collars for the fourth quarter of this year. The weighted average floor protection price of our 2020 hedges is $2.64 cents per Mcf. With the recent improvement in future gas prices, we've been actively adding to our 2021 hedge position. Since we last reported, we've added almost 270 million per day of natural gas swaps and 150 million per day of natural gas collars for 2021. So now we have about 540 million of our 2021 gas production hedged and the average floor protection of our hedges is $2.52 per Mcf. We also recently added 30 million per day of swaps covering our 2022 production at a price of $2.53 per Mcf. And I'll remind you, our policy is to continue to target hedging 50% to 60% of our expected production on a rolling 12-month basis. On Slide 8, we detail our operating cost per Mcfe, which kind of demonstrates our very low-cost structure. Our operating cost per Mcfe fell to $0.50 in the first quarter as compared to the fourth quarter rate of $0.55, and substantially lower than the first quarter of 2019, where our operating costs were $0.74. Our gathering costs were $0.23, production taxes averaged $0.04 and just the field-level operating costs were $0.23 for the quarter. On Slide 9, we detail our corporate overhead per Mcfe. Our cash G&A costs per Mcfe were $0.06 in the first quarter as compared to the fourth quarter at $0.04. And usually, the first quarter has the highest amount of just overall corporate G&A, due to the extra professional cost that we usually incur in connection with our year-end close. On Slide 10, we detailed our depreciation, depletion and amortization per Mcfe produced. So our DD&A averaged $0.88 in the first quarter, very comparable to the $0.89 we had in the fourth quarter. And it is a nice improvement over the $0.99 rate we had in the first quarter of 2019. On Slide 11, we recap our first quarter spending on our drilling and development activity and then what we expect to spend for all of 2020. So in the first quarter, we spent $130 million on development activities, $104 million was related to our Haynesville shale operated operations. We drilled 13 or 19.6 net operated horizontal Haynesville wells in the quarter, and we completed 13 or 9.3 net wells that were drilled in 2019. We spent another $26 million on nonoperated or other activity in the quarter. We did generate operating cash flow of $156 million in the quarter, resulting in free cash flow of $16 million in the quarter after we paid the $9.6 million dividend on our preferred shares. We dropped our activity level to 6 operated rigs in January and then further reduced our rig count to 5 operated rigs in March. Last month, we dropped another rig to reduce our current operated rigs down to 4 rigs, although we do anticipate picking a rig back up later this year. We continue to [ remain ] very responsive to the changing natural gas prices and remain very focused on generating free cash flow in 2020. We expect to spend in total, $412 million in 2020 to drill 47 or 36.5 net operated Haynesville wells. And then what -- we expect to be in various stages of drilling on an additional 18 or 12.5 net wells at the end of this year. At this lower rig count and taking into account the current natural gas prices, we do still expect to generate significant free cash flow this year of approximately $150 million to $200 million, despite the lower natural gas prices we've experienced so far this year. Slide 12 shows our balance sheet at the end of the first quarter of 2020. We recently completed the spring redetermination with our 18-member bank group. With buy price decks down 24% for gas, and then down almost 52% for oil, for the spring redetermination season our borrowing base was reduced down to $1.4 billion. We currently have $1.250 billion drawn on our revolving credit facility, but expect to continue to pay that down with the free cash flow that we're generating during the rest of this year. With a quarter ending cash position of $16 million, our current liquidity stands at $166 million. We also have $1.475 billion of senior notes outstanding including the $625 million of our 7 1/2% senior notes, which are due in 2025 and $850 million for our 9 3/4% senior notes due in 2026. With no debt maturities until 2024, and our current leverage ratio comfortably below our leverage ratio covenant of 4x, we are very well positioned to weather the current low oil and gas price environment. As a side note, I wanted to point out that our universal shelf registration statement that we filed 3 years ago expires next week. So we plan to file a replacement shelf tomorrow, as we always want to have that available to us. Now I'll turn it over to Dan to cover the first quarter drilling results in more detail.

Daniel Harrison

executive
#4

Thank you, Roland. If you look on Slide 13, this will show the outline of the acreage position as it stands now. We currently stand at 307,000 net acres. We currently have 1,977 net locations identified on the acreage and 95% of this acreage is currently held by production. This translates into minimal drilling commitments and it allows us the maximum flexibility with our drilling schedule for any changes in future market conditions. We also control the majority of the acreage with a 91% operated position and an average working interest of 76%. We've now drilled and completed 237 wells in the play, with an average IP of 23 million cubic feet per day. If you look at Slide 14, this shows a breakdown of our Haynesville/Bossier drilling inventory at the end of the first quarter. Our total gross operated inventory now stands at 2,383 locations. Our average net interest is 76%, equating to 1,803 net operated locations. On the nonoperated side, we have an additional 1,451 gross non-operated locations with an average 12% net interest, which adds another 174 net locations. In our gross operated inventory mix, we currently have 580 short laterals, 937 medium laterals and 866 long laterals. 60% of the gross operated locations are in the Haynesville, and the remaining 40% are in the Bossier. This inventory provides the company with well over 30 years of drilling locations based on our forecasted 2020 activity level. On Slide 15 is a summary of the 20 new wells we've completed and turned to sales since the last call and also shows an outline of where these latest wells are located across the acreage. As you can see, the majority of the new wells were completed in our Stateline and Elm Grove areas. The initial production rates ranged from 15 million to 32 million cubic feet per day with an average IP of 24 million cubic feet per day. The wells were drilled with varying lengths from 4,574 feet up to 9,885 feet with an average lateral of 8,758 feet. The wells were completed with sand loadings ranging from 2,200 pounds per foot up to 3,500 pounds per foot with the majority of the wells completed with 2,800 pounds per foot. Currently, we do not have any ongoing completion activity or frac crews working. We will be bringing back multiple crews at the beginning of the third quarter to resume our completion activity. Our current DUC count stands at 13 wells, and we anticipate having a total of 20 DUCs at the beginning of the third quarter when our completion activity resumes. On Slide 16, this provides a snapshot of our all-in D&C cost and trends since early 2017. These results track our wells, which have lateral lengths of greater than 6,000 feet. The D&C costs have been steadily trending down since early 2018, ending with the first quarter being the lowest quarterly D&C cost we have achieved to-date in the play. Our D&C costs in the first quarter averaged $1,121 a foot. This is a reduction of $199 a foot or 15% from our first quarter of 2019 cost of $1,320 a foot. Our completion cost, or more specifically our frac cost, continues to be the main driver here. During the first quarter, we began testing a smaller modified frac design on several infill and co-developed locations that we believe will yield better returns and economics while also preserving capital. We plan to continue testing this modified design when our completion activity resumes in the third quarter, and we will continue to monitor the performance from these wells. Our goal is to reduce our D&C cost even further down to $1,000 a foot. We firmly believe we can achieve this goal. And we've actually made good progress toward that end with the wells that we have already completed to date in the second quarter. Our goal is simple and that is to deliver the highest return and create the most value we can on the capital deployed. That summarizes up the operations. I'll now turn it back over to Jay for some final comments.

Miles Allison

executive
#5

All right. Again, thank you for the report. I would direct everybody to Slide 17 where we summarize our outlook for the year. This year, we are primarily focused on free cash flow generation and managing the company through the current low oil and natural gas price environment. While current natural gas prices remain relatively low, the outlook for natural gas has improved substantially for late 2020 and 2021, driven by our expectation for significant declines in natural gas supply in 2020 and 2021 due to a continued reduction in natural-gas-directed drilling and completion activity and less associated gas production from related activities in oil basins resulting from the collapse of oil prices. Our Haynesville drilling program generates economic returns even at today's low natural gas prices, which Roland and Dan have just showed you. We have cut back the number of wells we're drilling in order to generate free cash flow that we will use to pay down our debt and strengthen our balance sheet. That's a primary focus. The strength we have is our industry-leading cost structure and industry-leading well economics. We still expect 6% to 8% pro forma production growth in 2020 even with the reduced activity. We have prioritized free cash flow goals in 2020 over production growth, but have maintained adequate investment to keep our production flat on a longer-term basis. We have hedged almost half of our production for the next 12 months and have adequate liquidity of $166 million. I'll now have Ron Mills, our VP of Finance, provide some specific guidance for the rest of the year. Ron?

Ronald Mills

executive
#6

Thank you, Jay. On Slide 18, we provide financial guidance for the rest of the year for analysts and investors who model the company. I'd point out the guidance is unchanged from what we provided when we reported the fourth quarter earnings in late February. Our total production guidance is expected to average 1.25 to 1.45 Bcfe per day, of which 97% to 99% is expected to be natural gas. In that number, we have now factored in a 40% shut-in factor for our oil production over the remainder of the year due to potential shut-ins, though I would point out that the impact to-date has not been that high. We just wanted to make sure we prepared for potential shut-ins as oil producers are announcing significant shut-ins. On the cost side, our lease operating costs are expected to average $0.23 to $0.27 per Mcfe in 2020. Our gathering and transportation costs are also expected to average $0.23 to $0.27 per Mcfe in 2020. Production taxes are expected to remain in the $0.06 to $0.08 per Mcfe range, and DD&A is expected to remain in the $0.85 to $0.95 per Mcfe range. Cash G&A for the year is expected to average $0.05 to $0.07 per Mcfe. For the rest of the call, we'll take questions from the analysts who follow the company.

Operator

operator
#7

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Dun McIntosh with Johnson Rice.

Duncan McIntosh

analyst
#8

Jay, Roland and Ron, congrats on another strong quarter and nice EBITDA beat versus us and consensus. My question is on activity kind of over the remainder of the year. 1Q, you're at 13 completions, and you're kind of -- you're pointing to 35 for the year. Can you talk about the cadence over the remainder? I'd imagine that maybe it's more back-half weighted as you look to bring on volumes into what you all clearly think is going to be a stronger tape at the end of the year and heading into 2021.

Miles Allison

executive
#9

Yes. Roland will address that, but I want you to know we've got total flexibility on that too, okay? But our decisions will be determined by where the commodity prices are, where the sector is. So Roland?

Roland Burns

executive
#10

I think like we pointed out earlier, the second quarter, we only look to be bringing about 4.4 net wells to sales, and those are already -- are pretty much done now. So they mostly happened in April. As Dan pointed out, we're not -- we're giving the frac crews a little break here. And so we'll -- but we do expect to return to completing wells in the third quarter. And so the third and fourth quarter, we expect to see the rest of that, those -- the wells completed in those 2 quarters that we had planned for the year. Yes, but we do have the ability to decide to delay that if we want to in the third quarter. So we'll kind of look at -- see what how -- what's going on. And this plan was really put together really back when we reported the fourth quarter because we knew the summer was going to be the weaker part of the gas prices. And we wanted to have the free cash flow for the year kind of generated earlier in the year, not toward the end of the year and have more production come in online toward the end of the year, going into the better market that we're seeing for the very end of '20 and 2021. So we haven't made any major adjustments to the program because we already were geared up for low prices. And actually, prices are a little stronger than when we set the budgets. Unlike a lot of the other operators on the oil side that are catching up with massive changes to the budget. So we -- our plan was really almost designed perfectly for the environment and everything is going very smoothly as anticipated.

Miles Allison

executive
#11

Hopefully, you can see we've demonstrated in the past, even in the fourth quarter of '19, we announced that we have 9 rigs. We want to start the year, January 1 of '20, with 6 rigs. So we were very proactive even in the fourth quarter to protect this free cash flow. I mean, little did we know it would become more and more and more important, that's why we go from 6 rigs to 5. And then as Roland mentioned a little earlier, we're at 4 rigs. So we can toggle that back if we need to. That's where this 95% of our acreage is HBP'd, and we operate 91% of it. All those are big components that allow us to guide us through this environment. So our goal, again, is to create value by adjusting this budget if we need to. And hopefully, you've seen us demonstrate that in the past.

Duncan McIntosh

analyst
#12

Yes, absolutely. I'm sorry if I missed that earlier in the call, I got disconnected for a while there.

Miles Allison

executive
#13

Well, yes, thank you for joining. Again, it's a crowded day.

Duncan McIntosh

analyst
#14

Yes. And then for my second question, on the borrowing base, obviously any reduction is not what you're looking for. But all things considered when you look at what's happened kind of across the space to some of your peers, you've still got -- you're still left with $150 million in liquidity at the end of the quarter. And then in my model, I mean, I've got you generating about $150 million over the remainder of the year. So first, I assume that, that -- all that free cash goes straight to the revolver and into reducing that? And then second, how are you thinking about ways to maybe further reduce that beyond the free cash flow? Or is that just kind of the strategy at this point, just to harvest the cash and keep just chipping away at it?

Roland Burns

executive
#15

Yes. I think that, as you pointed -- as we pointed out, yes, there was a very significant decline in prices, even though we had nice growth in our -- as you saw from the year-end report, nice growth in our proved developed producing reserves. But such a large reduction in prices, which were below the -- the [ buying ] price decks are well below the strip prices during for the spring redetermination and so -- but I do think we've seen the low -- the worst of that. I mean, I think we've already seen 2 of our major banks start to raise their gas price decks and then lower their oil price decks further. So I think there's a bigger separation going forward. So even a small increase in the gas price decks they use can have a significant -- add a significant amount to a borrowing base that maybe we'll see in the fall. So we do think that the borrowing base has a lot of potential for growth as gas prices, they start getting closer to what the market is already showing for gas in 2021. But yes, we are going to use the free cash flow to restore the liquidity that we had before the production to the borrowing base, that's always the plan. And we think that will be -- will put us in good shape. And then obviously we'll -- at some point, our goal is to -- we have an overall goal of getting leverage below 2. And we're just a little bit -- we're a little -- slightly above 3x levered now. So I mean, our goal will be overall to continue to focus on the balance sheet and focus toward getting toward that goal. And stronger gas prices will help a lot next year, and then -- and so I think we've got a good plan, and we'll continue to kind of execute on that.

Miles Allison

executive
#16

The one thing that came out in our borrowing base review was that the gold standard is that you really have true free cash flow while you have a little growth. And we do have that $150 million to $200 million of true gold standard free cash flow while growing our production maybe at 6% to 8%. So some have free cash flow, but they have no growth or they have negative growth. And so that was, I think, tested. And I think the second thing I would answer, 73% of this company is owned by the Jones family. And they have never been more excited about the growth and the opportunities. And I think that's always something important that the shareholders need to know, that they have not lost their enthusiasm at all. In fact, they're probably at peak enthusiasm right now because they're very opportunistic. And we -- I think we, as a company, we're prepared for the cycle we're in, we've got the right assets, right people, the right cost. The opportunity is there, and we'll seize it. So -- and I think the banks trust us with that.

Operator

operator
#17

And our next question is from Phillips Johnston with Capital One.

Phillips Johnston

analyst
#18

Last quarter, you guys obviously cut the plan rig count for the year. Obviously, you've mentioned the improved macro backdrop since then. I know the main goal continues to be free cash flow generation and pay down on the revolver, and it's probably a bit premature to talk about accelerating activity. But what would you need to see to add one or more rigs back to the program at some point either later this year or next?

Daniel Harrison

executive
#19

Well, I think that's a good question. And obviously, that's the first time people started talking about that. But the -- I think you still have relatively low gas prices. So I don't think you try to front-run the improvement we see in the curve. And -- but I think that as we assess next year, we do see probably a little higher activity level. Just based on the hedges we've already put in, I think we can support a 6- to 7-rig program. And so as we look ahead to next year, we'd probably see a higher activity level. But won't commit to that or implement that until we're really in, realizing prices that are much improved prices from where they are right now.

Miles Allison

executive
#20

The reason I love that question is because it shows that you've looked out into '20 -- late 2020, 2021 and we get to talk about our almost 2,000 net locations that we have in this Haynesville/Bossier area. So we are prepared with this inventory that we have that we've demonstrated by drilling these other 230-plus locations, really completed them since 2015. We're prepared for the future. We just need to have a little bit of higher gas price, and we need to pay down more on our RBL facility. We do need to get that paid down a little more.

Phillips Johnston

analyst
#21

Yes, that makes sense. And then Jay, I guess, maybe if we can just get your latest big picture thoughts on industry consolidation in the Haynesville, especially given what's happened in the last couple of months with obviously much lower oil prices, but that improved macro backdrop on gas possibly over the next couple of years or so?

Miles Allison

executive
#22

Yes. Again, we looked -- again, in the world, you always have, have and have-nots, and we've been on both sides of that. We've been on the have-not side for a long time with natural gas. I think when the Joneses came in, I mean, he's very good about looking around the corner. You got to look around the corner to be where he is. And as we looked around the corner in 2015, '16, 17, he looked around the corner of '18, and we said, we, right or wrong, we really want to be a natural gas company. And that's where Ron said, 97%, 98%, 99% of our production will be natural gas. And then we had to say, well, it's like location, location, location, not only drilling locations, but geographically where are you located. And where do you have this midstream that's a plus to you, not a negative. So as the Joneses looked around the corner and we were there, hopefully, out there showing them what we were seeing, you end up with today. And I think today, I do think that we've got 13 million barrels of oil in the U.S. You probably have 5 million of that in Texas. You see -- you got 750,000 oilfield workers in the U.S. You probably have half of those in Texas. And you're saying maybe half of those are going to lose their job. It's a very tough market out there for oil. And usually, it will take $40-plus for you to really want to drill oil, for oil. So we look at that, and we have to look at the oil side model before we look at the natural gas model. When we look at natural gas, and we do look at LNG, we say, maybe we lose a BCF or 2, but there is still a huge demand for LNG. There's a huge industrial demand. Fortunately, the commodity that we have is not -- it's not a transportation commodity like oil is. So I think it is, it's cleaner on the carbon side. We think it's needed. We think it pushes coal out of the way a little bit. And it's probably at 3 -- at $2.80 to $3.15 commodity, that's kind of the price range we look at. And you asked where we would get it really excited. You get a $2.80 to $3 gas price. Our cost structure with our opportunities we have, we're super excited. We just want to maintain where we are. We want to get better with where we are. We want to demonstrate to the bondholders and the equity owners and our stakeholders that we can manage this. And -- but we think there's some tough times. We don't see $22, $23, $32, $33 oil curing the problem for the oil side of the cycle. And we think, as this associated gas goes away and these pipelines were not built to service these oilfields, is we only become stronger. And I think we've become a little supercharged because of where we're located. Our economic stream that we are, high margins and low-cost producer. So that is our corporate attitude and I think that's the Jones's attitude.

Operator

operator
#23

Our next question is from Jane Trotsenko with Stifel.

William Howell

analyst
#24

This is William Howell asking on behalf of Jane. You guys talked about completions cadence a little bit. Could you touch a little bit on CapEx and production cadence for the remainder of the year?

Daniel Harrison

executive
#25

Sure. And I think given that completions are more than half of the cost of these wells, we do see that the second quarter being the lightest CapEx quarter and hopefully a good free cash flow generating quarter. And then probably -- so it's not going to be balanced spending for the rest of the year. I think the -- you'll probably see the second quarter the lightest. And then you kind of -- after that, kind of split the rest of the CapEx between the last 2 quarters as we -- if we kind of return to the completion activity in third quarter like we currently plan to.

William Howell

analyst
#26

Got it. And then my other question is, could you comment a little bit on the industry activity levels that you're seeing in the Haynesville?

Daniel Harrison

executive
#27

Sure. I think we've seen most of the other companies in the Haynesville are private, that are actually running rigs, other than a few. And we do see that trending down a little bit. We've seen a few rigs dropped. I think the play, the activity level in the Haynesville is kind of a testimony to just how strong the economics are of these wells. I mean, in the -- if you look at the basin, I mean, the basis differentials are very, very tight. Transportation is very inexpensive unless you've got -- unless you've contracted to way above market rates, which we're blessed not to have. The -- so I think the activity level in the Haynesville has been a little more resilient than some of the other plays because of the strong IRRs that you have with the wells. But given that capital is tight for everybody. And I think nobody -- I think most of the operators, for the most part, want to spend within cash flow or under cash flow. And so that is we've seen the larger -- all but maybe one of the larger private operators, really kind of pull back in, kind of within their cash flow level, so...

Miles Allison

executive
#28

Today, you have 31 rigs that are busy in the Haynesville/Bossier. You have one private equity-backed company that has 8 rigs, you have 4 companies that have 4 rigs, and we're one of those 4. And then the rest of them, they may have one rig or 2 at the most. So it's 31, that's the last kind of count number we looked at.

William Howell

analyst
#29

Got it. And then just lastly, should we maybe model in slightly lower Bakken production volumes, given the pricing up there?

Daniel Harrison

executive
#30

Yes, that's what Ron had alluded to, that basically, we don't -- we have not seen it. We've seen reports of about 20% of our Bakken production being shut-in. But we're kind of modeling 40% shut-in just for the rest of the year, with that returning next year. And frankly, we wish it was all shut in. I mean, because the prices are so low that there's really -- that, that shut in number has no impact on cash flow. We'd, frankly, rather preserve the reserves. But we don't -- we're all about operating on the oil side and have a lot of different operators. So I mean, basically, I think if you kind of track, if you cover the Bakken and kind of see an industry trend there, you could probably apply that to our oil production and probably be close because we kind of have nonoperated interest probably with all the major Bakken operators kind of spread out. So we're -- that's a good proxy.

Operator

operator
#31

Our next question is from Welles Fitzpatrick with SunTrust.

Welles Fitzpatrick

analyst
#32

Good morning. The shut in production volumes that you guys highlighted have picked up a little bit, obviously. Are those largely due to third-party offset fracs or is that something you control? And with the reduction in basin activity, do you expect that to kind of tick back down to that sort of 2%, 3% that you've been in, in quarters past?

Daniel Harrison

executive
#33

Yes. This is Dan. So we -- approximately 3/4 of the shut-in production we had in Q1 was due to offset frac activity. And I'd say probably the biggest change in Q1 versus the previous quarters is, the big majority of that was, probably more than we usually average, was due to offset operators that just had a lot of activity nearby our acreage, some of our better production that we had to shut in. We did have a fairly large project we did over the Elm Grove area that had a -- that's a really good area. And we had to shut a lot of our good production in for that project. So it was definitely an abnormal quarter in that regard, and we do see that being much lower for the rest of the year, definitely in Q2.

Miles Allison

executive
#34

The good thing about what you see there is, the quality of these wells that we've been bringing on, you see this sensitivity because these are really high-producing rate wells and any offset operator, they shut in, we shut in. You can see this impact. The beauty of it is that it's not because we don't have quality wells, because we do have quality and you can see the sensitivity. So it's a good thing. You can see it. I think we've cured it for the most part. And the rig count has dropped from the 50s down to that 31, and a lot of these companies are doing what we're doing, they're kind of waiting on completions.

Daniel Harrison

executive
#35

So what I'd add that we've got more than adequate takeaway and regional basis differentials are really -- are nice and tight. So it's not a -- it's really just the frac activity, and that will be -- especially in the -- as we go into May and June we'll be at a pretty low level. So we expect to get back to kind of normal kind of shut-in levels, which are closer to, for us, 2% to 3% versus the 5%.

Welles Fitzpatrick

analyst
#36

Okay. Okay. Perfect. Yes. No. It's certainly better shut-ins than what some of your some of your oil rig peers are seeing.

Miles Allison

executive
#37

That was my point. Yes, that's a great way to say it. Thank you.

Daniel Harrison

executive
#38

Yes. We what -- we do produce a little oil just outside of the nonoperated part. And that is more in our -- more on the East Texas side and maybe with Cotton Valley and other type production, it's pretty small. But we have good storage capability. So we don't even want to sell that. So we will -- for our operated oil, we're going to kind of just store that, so over the next 2 to 3 months, and not just give it away.

Welles Fitzpatrick

analyst
#39

Understood. And then it seems like the lateral length also crept up in 1Q. Obviously, that's great for capital efficiency amongst other things. Should we expect those kind of longer laterals moving forward? Or was that just a little bit of noise?

Daniel Harrison

executive
#40

No. I think that generally, and you can see that on our CapEx slide, you can see that the -- as you -- and if you kind of look at the progression, you can see the lateral lengths are lengthening because as we have the -- a little lower program, I mean, we obviously focused on the longer laterals, they have the best returns. And even the wells drilling at year-end, they're the longest. So I think you'll see the lateral lengths increasing kind of, like the first quarter was a good proxy. So really closer to averaging in the higher 8's to 9,000 feet per well. So usually, we only do a shorter lateral, if it's just, is something that's needed to kind of finish up an area, and it's the only real way to -- it's already established where you can't create a long lateral in the future.

Operator

operator
#41

[Operator Instructions] And we have no further questions at this time.

Miles Allison

executive
#42

I guess in closing, again, as I mentioned earlier, it is a pretty crowded agenda. So those of you that are still here, thank you. Our commitment to you our stakeholder is to continue to manage this business properly. Through very difficult times, we're going to be patient. We are going to seize opportunities as they surface, and they make us a better company. So thank you for your time. And thank you for your trust.

Operator

operator
#43

Thank you again for joining us today. This does conclude today's conference call. You may now disconnect.

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Comstock Resources, Inc. earnings transcripts and 32,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.