Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

July 7, 2020

NASDAQ US Health Care Biotechnology special 37 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Greetings, and welcome to the Corvus Pharmaceuticals Update Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Zack Kubow of Pure Communications. Thank you. You may begin.

Zack Kubow

attendee
#2

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for the Corvus Pharmaceuticals conference call to discuss the initiation of a COVID-19 clinical trial. This call is also being webcast with presentation slides. We encourage participants to join the webcast in order to view the slides. You can find the link to join the webcast on the Investor Relations home page of the Corvus website. Joining me on the call from the company are Dr. Richard Miller, Chief Executive Officer; Leiv Lea, Chief Financial Officer; Dr. Mehrdad Mobasher, Chief Medical Officer; and Dr. Stephen Willingham, Director of Translational Biology, who leads our COVID-19 research program. The executive team will open the call with some prepared remarks followed by a question-and-answer period. Turning to Slide 2. I would like to remind everyone that comments made by management today and answers to questions will include forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions as of today, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements, including the risks and uncertainties described in Corvus' most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and other filings the company makes with the SEC from time-to-time. The company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, except as required by law. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Richard Miller. Richard?

Richard Miller

executive
#3

Thank you, Zack, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the exciting news that we have initiated a clinical study of a novel immunotherapy for COVID-19. The unique biologic features of CPI-006, our B-cell activating monoclonal antibody, give it the potential to be an important treatment option for COVID-19 patients. Specifically, we believe it could increase production of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, reducing the severity and duration of COVID-19 disease, along with improving long-term immunity. The antigen-specific activation of B-cells may provide a foundational immunotherapy approach that can lead to treatments or preventions for future outbreaks, including SARS-CoV-2 mutant variants, other coronaviruses and future pandemics. We are proud to join others in the biopharma industry, working to develop the testing, treatments and vaccines needed to address this dreadful pandemic. Our unique treatment approach has evolved over the last few years, derived from our laboratory and clinical work in oncology. Much of the data supporting this work has been presented at major oncology meetings, including the Society for the Immunotherapy of Cancer, SITC, in 2018 and again in 2019, and at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO, in 2019. The agenda for today's call is shown on Slide 3. We will begin with a brief overview of Corvus for those that may be new to the story, followed by an in-depth discussion on CPI-006 for COVID-19. This includes an overview of CPI-006, its mechanism of B-cell activation and the preclinical and clinical evidence that provides the rationale for initiating the study including a patient case study. We will also cover the study design and anticipated time line and our thoughts on the long-term potential of -- for CPI-006 and COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. We will close with a summary of the key takeaways from the call, and following the prepared remarks, Leiv, Mehrdad and Stephen will join me for a Q&A session. Let me start with the company overview on Slide 4. Corvus is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company with 4 programs in human trials. This includes the COVID-19 study that we announced today along with our core clinical programs in oncology. Our lead program, ciforadenant, blocks the adenosine pathway, and CPI-006 is an immunomodulatory antibody. Both of these agents are being evaluated in multiple cancer indications. Most recently, we presented updated clinical data at ASCO from our Phase IB/II clinical trial of ciforadenant in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma. In addition to confirming the benefit of blocking the adenosine 2a receptor, the new data supports and refines our predictive biomarker to identify patients most likely to respond to treatment with ciforadenant. Based on this data, we are planning to initiate a biomarker-driven pivotal trial in renal cell cancer. In addition, we plan to provide data updates on CPI-006 in cancer and CPI-818, our ITK inhibitor for T-cell lymphomas at oncology meetings later this year. Corvus was started in 2015 by a group of successful industry veterans that played major roles in the discovery and development of both Rituxan and Imbruvica, both major breakthroughs in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and autoimmune diseases. There is a common thread between these medicines and CPI-006. They are all focused on B-cell biology. Let's review some of the biology behind CPI-006. As shown on Slide 5, CPI-006 is a immunized monoclonal antibody that reacts with a specific site or epitope on CD73 [Audio Gap] B-cells and T cells. Resta and Thompson showed, in 1997, that CD73 was involved in lymphocyte activation. Binding of CPI-006 to naive B-cells, cells that have not encountered antigen, sends a signal through the cell to become activated. Activated B-cells express markers that cause them to traffic to lymph nodes where they become exposed to antigen and differentiate into plasmablasts and then plasma cells. Plasma cells are little antibody factories that pump out large quantities of specific antibodies to the antigen. One of the hallmarks of the immune system is memory. Once we have been exposed to an antigen, the next time we encounter it, we can respond faster and more briskly limiting disease severity. This is immunity. The cells responsible for this are called memory B-cells, and they are induced by CPI-006. Memory B-cells are long-lived. In some cases, they can persist for years. After encountering antigen, they expand and circulate throughout the body, acting as our immune surveillance system, protecting us from future reinfection and disease. As shown in the slide, the strategy behind CPI-006 immunotherapy is that the antigen is the virus, SARS-CoV-2. The antigen is already present in the infected patient, so we can think of this approach as therapeutic vaccination. On Slide 6, we are focused on the key points. CPI-006 is intended to boost antibody response to the viral antigens and enhance the generation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 memory B-cells. We believe this will result in improved clinical outcomes with increased antibody levels or titers, accelerating viral clearance, shortening recovery times and reducing the window during which a patient is contagious. Increased production of long-lived memory B-cells could provide long-lasting immunity. It is also possible that enhanced immune response will provide patients with increased cross-protection against mutants of SARS-CoV-2 and other coronaviruses. Based on this mechanism of action and these potential benefits, we believe CPI-006 has the potential [Technical Difficulty] a foundational therapy for treatment or prevention of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases. We are not aware of any other agent, antibody or small-molecule targeting CD73 that has exhibited these properties. Other anti-CD73 antibodies react with a different region of CD73 and are designed to block production of adenosine, another function of the CD73 protein. Adenosine plays no role in the immunomodulatory effects seen with CPI-006 described here. As far as we know, Corvus is the only company exploring the potential to induce antibody production via B-cell activation for the treatment of COVID-19 [Technical Difficulty] Approximately 90 patients have been safely treated with repeated doses of CPI-006 to date in the company's Phase I/IB study in oncology. At ASCO 2019, Dr. Jason Luke from the University of Pittsburgh made an oral presentation that included data demonstrating that infusions of CPI-006 resulted in rapid activation and migration of B-cells. And we have seen evidence of antitumor antibodies produced in some of our cancer patients treated with CPI-006. The data on the next 2 slides, 7 and 8, comes directly from presentations we have made at medical meetings over the past 2 years. Slide 7 shows results from an in vitro study designed to compare CPI-006 to another anti-CD73 antibody that reacts with a different epitope or region of -- on CD73. On the top left, using human blood lymphocytes treated in vitro, you can see an increase in expression of CD69, a known marker of B-cell activation that occurs with incubation with CPI-006, compared to incubation with an anti-CD73 antibody from another company that is also in cancer trials that does not activate B-cells. CD69 is the signal for B-cells to traffic to lymph nodes. The remaining data on the slide shows that in vitro, the cells begin to differentiate or transform into plasmablasts. They begin to express markers of plasma cells, such as CD27 and they begin to secrete IgM and IgG. On the bottom slide, you can appreciate what this looks like under the microscope. Normal resting B-cells transform into antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells. You don't need to be a hematologist to appreciate these morphologic changes. And this happens in vivo in patients. We've been able to study this phenomenon in our cancer patients receiving CPI-006. Slide 8 highlights results from patients treated after a single dose of CPI-006 in our Phase I oncology study. We measured the levels of total and memory B-cells at 3 points in time, pretreatment, 30 minutes post-treatment and 21 days posttreatment. Here is an example in one patient using flow cytometry to quantitate memory B-cells. In the middle plot, you can see that after 30 minutes there is a reduction in total B-cells. They are trafficking to lymphoid tissues. But at day 21, B-cells return to the circulation and the memory B-cells now represent 29% of the total compared to around 10% previously, a threefold increase. For the experts on this call, memory cells are identified based on the lack of expression of IgD and positive expression of CD27. They are IgD negative, CD27 positive. On the right-hand side of the slide, we have plotted this comparison of memory B-cells 30 minutes after treatment and 21 days after treatment with CPI-006 compared to baseline, described by full change. In several patients receiving 6 milligrams per kilogram or more, there is a significant increase in the number of memory B-cells. The findings are very reproducible and robust. These data are consistent with the production of a humoral adaptive immune response. What this means is, an antibody response to a new foreign antigen introduced into the body. The data I just reviewed demonstrating the activation, differentiation of B-cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells and a generation of memory B-cells by CPI-006 came from preclinical in vitro and in vivo clinical research related to our oncology study. In a cancer patient, we are seeking to generate anti-tumor antibodies. In a COVID-19 patient, we would be looking for antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Now I would like to describe our findings of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response and memory B-cell production in a patient in our oncology study with concomitant COVID-19. Although anecdotal, this patient provides us with very valuable information. Slide 9 is an overview of this patient case study. This is new data that we've not shared before. In April, one of our New York sites enrolled a 68-year-old African-American female with advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in our CPI-006 cancer study. The patient was diagnosed with concomitant COVID-19 infection on routine screening at the time of initiating CPI-006 therapy for cancer. The patient was in a very high-risk group for progression of COVID-19 due to her age, race and comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer and extensive prior treatment with chemotherapies. In the top table, you can see that serum antibody testing demonstrated no anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody at baseline and the development of high titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM of greater than 1 to 100,000 and greater than 1 to 3,200 respectively at 6 weeks. For context, recovered patients with serum titers of 1 to 320 or higher are candidates to donate blood for COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy. Titers of antibody binding to RBD, receptor-binding domain of the virus, were also very high. The patient remained asymptomatic from COVID-19 following treatment with CPI-006 and our initial positive PCR test converted to a negative test at 6 weeks. We also measured her memory B-cells. At the bottom, you can see that memory B-cells in the blood increased to 30% of total B-cells from 16% previously, similar to the findings we shared on prior slides. The level of antibodies produced by this patient are very high, especially given her poor prognostic features. These titers of antibody are in the range, sometimes seen with younger, more favorable COVID-19 patients that do not have the same adverse risk factors. On Slide 10, we have included 2 charts that compare the IgG and IgM levels of the CPI-006 treated patient with the levels from 10 patients that recovered from COVID-19. These patients were younger and had no comorbidities. And you can see on this slide, the IgG and IgM levels in the CPI-006 patient were high compared to this much more favorable group of recovered COVID-19 patients. Now let's look at our Phase I study design on Slide 11. The study will examine the safety and immunobiologic activity of a single dose of CPI-006 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. These are patients who do not require invasive or mechanical ventilation and have satisfactory blood oxygen saturation on room air or low-flow oxygen. The objective of the study is to show that CPI-006 improves anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response. CPI-006 will be administered intravenously over 10 to 15 minutes. At the highest doses, this will be a volume of about 30 to 40 cc. In the future, we believe we can modify the formulation to be delivered by the more convenient subcutaneous route. The dose-escalation study is expected to enroll up to 30 patients in 4 cohorts receiving a dose of 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 or 5.0 milligrams per kilogram. Patients will receive standard care for COVID-19 for the duration of the study. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in serum immunoglobulin, IgM and IgG, anti-SARS-CoV-2 titers at day 28 compared to baseline. We will follow antibody levels for 6 months to assess effects on long-term immunity. The study will also examine safety and other clinical endpoints, including time-to-resolution of symptoms, clearance of virus by PCR testing and duration of hospitalization. The first cohort of 5 patients enrolled in the study was treated at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia. Temple has been caring for large numbers of COVID-19 patients. Other sites participating in the study at this time include Mount Sinai in New York. Several other leading centers are in various stages of obtaining protocol approvals and will participate in the trial. Since the primary study endpoint is antibody response, we expect to have meaningful data in 3 to 6 months. On Slide 12, we have outlined the initial and potential future role of CPI-006 in COVID-19. In the future, if successful, we see this immunotherapy playing a role in later-stage patients or in early-stage patients in the outpatient setting and perhaps even as a vaccine adjuvant in disease prevention for use in the elderly or high-risk individuals. Of course, at this time, we do not know the effectiveness of vaccines that are under development, but historically, vaccination of the elderly and sick has been challenging. To summarize, as outlined in Slide 13, I want to emphasize several key points from our announcement today. We believe CPI-006 has the potential to be a novel immunotherapy for the treatment of COVID-19. The mechanism of action is unlike any other therapies being studied for COVID-19 that we are aware of, stimulating the body's adaptive immune response to increased levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and memory B-cells. This could benefit patients by reducing the severity and duration of their infection and potentially enhancing their long-term immunity to repeat infection. If successful, we believe CPI-006 will be an important option for a range of COVID-19 patients beyond the initial study group with mild-to-moderate symptoms. Our clinical trial may provide proof-of-concept for use in future outbreaks of the current or related strains of coronaviruses or other viruses. We are working diligently with our clinical trial sites to quickly enroll the study and collect 28-day follow-up data on antibody titers for patients. If the study meets its objectives, Corvus intends to work with the FDA to conduct a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized pivotal study to support a regulatory submission for FDA approval. Our plans include evaluating CPI-006 in both the outpatient and the inpatient setting. Outpatient treatments are of great interest as this group of patients is becoming an increasing part of the COVID-19 pandemic. In closing, in addition to the COVID-19 program discussed here, we are continuing to execute on our other clinical studies and anticipate presenting updated data from our cancer programs in the fourth quarter of this year. Before I turn it over for Q&A, I'd like to, in particular, thank our employees who have exhibited extraordinary effort during this very trying time to get an IND protocol and clinical sites up and running assays in place very expeditiously, almost flawlessly. Thank you, every one of our employees, who, I think, sensed the unprecedented medical need caused by this terrible pandemic. With that, we will now open the call for questions. Operator?

Operator

operator
#4

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Mara Goldstein with Mizuho.

Mara Goldstein

analyst
#5

Yes. Can you hear me okay? [Technical Difficulty]

Operator

operator
#6

Okay. It seems that she's having some technical difficulties. Our next question comes from the line of Biren Amin with Jefferies.

Biren Amin

analyst
#7

Richard, if I could just start with the patient with non-small cell lung cancer that received CPI-006 and that showed an antibody response, and it was basically -- had increased levels of titers. What dose was given of CPI-006 in that patient? And how many doses were given?

Richard Miller

executive
#8

That patient received a single dose of 18 milligrams per kilogram. In our data that we've presented at other meetings, we see changes in B-cell trafficking and activation with as low as 1 milligram per kilogram a single time. And at 3 milligrams per kilogram, we see a very reproducible B-cell activation and associated biology. So that's why the doses that we're examining in this Phase I trial go from 0.3 up to 5. We think that covers a range that's going to be sufficient to cause activation of B-cells.

Biren Amin

analyst
#9

Which was going to be my second question. Why evaluate 0.3, given you already, I'm sure, have safety data that's available from healthy volunteers as well as from cancer patients, where you've tested higher doses? Why not go into a dose that would be a therapeutic range, like a 1 or 3 milligram, as your dose level one?

Richard Miller

executive
#10

Okay. So COVID-19 patients have very unique pathophysiology. As you're aware, they have coagulopathy, they have a lot of inflammation, and we thought it was prudent to start with a lower dose in that kind of patient population. Remember, this is a new disease, never -- we never faced this before. So that's the first point. The second point is, B-cells are circulating in your blood and even though 0.3 milligrams per kilogram sounds like a low dose, that's enough antibody to actually react with B-cells that are in the blood. Now higher dose will probably be better, but it is possible that you'll see something at a dose like that. So we're just trying to cover the range of dosing, Biren, in a disease that nobody has ever seen before.

Operator

operator
#11

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Swayampakula Ramakanth with H.C. Wainwright.

Swayampakula Ramakanth

analyst
#12

Certainly, it looks like you have some convincing anecdotal data based on that single patient. My question is a little bit more general. Obviously, this is not the first coronavirus we have seen. There has been SARS, there's been MERS from previous times. Has anybody tried any of the B-cell treatments that we have out in the market to date? And has there been any data regarding what sort of responses that they had received with such treatments?

Richard Miller

executive
#13

Well, RK, I'm a little confused by your question. To my knowledge, there is no other antibody that exhibits these properties that activates B-cells. Now my personal experience and my team, we've been involved in drugs like ibrutinib and Rituxan that do the opposite, they take B-cells away. This is a drug that activates B-cells. And I don't think this has ever been done before. But one of the interesting things when you bring up MERS and SARS-CoV-1, one of the nice things about eliciting an antibody response is that it's polyclonal. And therefore, any antigenic variation, variability from one virus to the next, could possibly be hit by the nature of the immune response that you have because it's polyvalent.

Operator

operator
#14

Our next question comes from the line of Mara Goldstein with Mizuho.

Mara Goldstein

analyst
#15

Great. Let's try this again. Can you hear me?

Richard Miller

executive
#16

Yes.

Mara Goldstein

analyst
#17

Great. Just a question on the -- your patient one. And can you correlate the COVID recovery with the antibody titers? Are you -- have you looked at that experience and can you talk to us about that? And then secondarily, are you able to -- or would you, at this point, look to modify any of the current CPI-006 trials or subset of patients with co-infection of COVID or as a prevention for COVID infection?

Richard Miller

executive
#18

All right. First of all, your first question. So the patient had a positive PCR test on nasal swab at the initiation of the 006. It was just done on a routine clinic visit for her cancer treatment. Six weeks later, she had those enormous titers of 1 to over 100,000 in IgG and 1 to over 3,200 IgM. In fact, the hospital that she was treated out, which is Mount Sinai, was off the charts. They had to redo it. At 6 weeks, her PCR test was negative. So her test became negative at the time that we saw that high-titer antibody response. Obviously, it's one patient, you can't prove that they're associated, but we feel good about it because this patient is not expected to do well, given her age and comorbidities and cancer, especially lung cancer patients do very badly with COVID-19. They have a 40% mortality from COVID-19 in a recent Lancet article presented and also presented at ASCO recently. And titers of 1 to 100,000, especially an IgM titer that was still persistent at 6 weeks is very, very unusual. That's very extraordinary. So that's the answer to that question. In terms of the CPI-006, first of all, in our cancer study, we're continuing with our dosing regimen and what we've been doing in that study. Now for the COVID-19, again, study, to repeat, we're going to give a single injection because we think that's sufficient to activate B-cells. Remember, one beautiful thing about the immune system, it's not stoichiometric. It's catalytic, if you will. It has the ability to amplify. We can give you a tiny little bit of antigen and you can amount a robust antibody response. So it just needs to be triggered, and then it amplifies itself. That's the beauty of the immune system. So we have our dosing regimen now. We've gone through the first cohort. We'll be measuring the antibody levels at day 7, 14, 28, et cetera. And obviously, we'll increase the dose from there. Now in terms of comparing cancer and COVID-19, there's one big difference. I mean, there's obviously a lot of differences in disease, they're completely different etiology. But cancer patients have antigens on their tumor, but they are very subtle, very subtle. You have to work hard to show that there's any unique antigens in a cancer. And you know there are many companies and many academic laboratories that have been working 100 years on that, very subtle. Cancer cells are mostly self. SARS-CoV-2 is not self. It is an extremely foreign protein, very foreign. And so we feel that the single injection at the doses we're using will be enough to trigger a more robust immune response to the foreign virus. Mara, did that answer your questions? I may have forgotten the different components.

Mara Goldstein

analyst
#19

No, that's great. I appreciate it.

Operator

operator
#20

Our next question comes from the line of Robert Driscoll with Wedbush.

Robert Driscoll

analyst
#21

Just wondering how maybe you can -- thinking about controlling the timing of treatment set for the patients that received 006 in the Phase I and maybe in subsequent studies? And just assuming that the earlier the patient receives the dose, the better.

Richard Miller

executive
#22

Yes. The earlier the -- well, I'm not sure we know that, but the protocol is written so that they have to have a positive PCR within 7 days.

Robert Driscoll

analyst
#23

Okay. Got it.

Richard Miller

executive
#24

Okay. Now of course, Robert, sometimes you have a patient who might have symptoms for a couple of weeks, right, before they go in and see the doctor. So we're going to learn about that stuff, but we require a recent PCR, cannot be more than 7 days.

Operator

operator
#25

There are no further questions at this time. I'd like to turn the call back over to management for any closing remarks.

Richard Miller

executive
#26

All right. Well, thank you very much, everyone, for getting up so early on this morning to listen to our call. We're happy to follow up and talk with you, and I think our -- my assistant will be scheduling some meetings, the slides, I believe, will be up on our website. And we look forward to presenting more data about the COVID-19 study, really, within a few months. Thank you very much.

Operator

operator
#27

Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation. Have a wonderful day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.