CSX Corporation (CSX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 17, 2020

NASDAQ US Industrials Ground Transportation conference_presentation 46 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Justin Long

analyst
#1

This is Justin Long from Stephens. I want to welcome everyone to the next fireside chat with CSX. Thanks for joining us today. We're really excited to have Jim Foote, CEO, presenting on behalf of the company. As a reminder, for the fireside chat, I'll be moderating the questions. [Operator Instructions] We've got about 45 minutes scheduled, and I'll fit in as many as I can. So Jim, thanks for being here. Really appreciate your support of this event even if it's virtual. I'm going to kick it to you to get things started off with just an update on the business, how things are trending quarter-to-date, and then we'll dive into some questions. And I think you might be on mute.

James Foote

executive
#2

Technology at its finest.

Justin Long

analyst
#3

There we go. We're set now. Thanks.

James Foote

executive
#4

Ah jeez, all of that, and I still screwed it up, what can I say? I probably would have done the same thing if we were in person, so I don't feel too bad. Great to see you. Yes, we were just saying I wish we were in Nashville together and with everyone in the room together, but maybe next year. How are things going? Wow, tough, tough. Better, obviously, everybody knows, things are better than -- better than it was with the business just coming around. We're doing well, trying to keep the railroad running to a high level of service and efficiency. And just trying to get through this with our customers and everyone else, taking care of our employees. And I think we're hopefully on track to get out of this mess as a country soon.

Justin Long

analyst
#5

And I know you didn't provide much guidance in terms of the near term and the fourth quarter. But I am just curious, from a high level, when you look at the trends in the business quarter-to-date, volume, service, operating leverage, et cetera, have things kind of played out in line with your expectations? Or anything that you would call out as outperforming or underperforming?

James Foote

executive
#6

Well, based on my personal -- my personal opinion is I think things have come back stronger and faster than I had originally anticipated. I know you play a lot of golf and every once in a while, you hit a good drive on a par 5, and you go over the sprinkler head and you're about 300 yards out and it says, "Are you kidding?" It's kind of like what I look -- what I see when I look into the crystal ball to try and tell me what next month or next week or the next day is going to be like, that's the answer I get. But I think everything has come back, clearly faster than what I personally had expected. And that's a good thing. The consumer economy has, I think, outperformed everyone's expectations. But we had 2 differing economic environments going into this, with a very, very sluggish for over a year period on the industrial economy and the consumer economy doing very well. So it's not unexpected that consumer economy came back quicker and faster. Automotive came back stronger, faster than what I had expected. And so those are good signs. The economy, I think, is resilient. The economy was relatively strong going in. And I think we're -- hopefully, we get back to where we were soon.

Justin Long

analyst
#7

Maybe building on what you said about the consumer, there's obviously this restocking that needs to occur. Based on the conversations that you've had with your customers, how long do you think that restocking process could take? Is that through the end of the first quarter? Or is it longer? What are your thoughts around the timing of that?

James Foote

executive
#8

Well, I still think -- everyone, I think, is expecting it to go into the first quarter. We're kind of going into -- we're going into peak with an -- in an unusual demand for e-commerce. The outlook in terms of the port projections and those sort of things, from an international perspective, are -- look like it's going to -- should, absent some sort of unusual occurrence globally, continue into the first quarter. And I think that our opinions are not inconsistent with everybody else in the intermodal world.

Justin Long

analyst
#9

And then on the industrial side of the equation, are you seeing more green shoots on that front? And as we think about next year, do you think there's potential for industrial to outpace consumer? And I would assume if that happens, the mix implications for your business would be pretty good. So would love to get your thoughts around that.

James Foote

executive
#10

No. Again, I don't think that we expect the industrial economy to overtake the consumer economy in any -- in the near term. But we were -- I think we were coming off of a relatively weak base. It's -- you have to go back and it seems like ancient history now, but remember what was going on with all the tariff issues and what the implications of that were on the industrial economy. And so we'll have to -- let's -- hopefully, we can get back to where that relatively weak base was. And then, whether it's stimulus or whether there are other factors at play that caused the industrial economy to rebound at rates above what we have traditionally seen, we'll have to just wait and see.

Justin Long

analyst
#11

And thinking about peak season, I think the expectation across the board is it would be strong just given the strength we've seen in the consumer and the freight market. I'm assuming that's played out, but would love to kind of get your thoughts on what you've seen there. And more importantly, just from a service perspective, given things have bounced back, you made the point earlier at a pace that's greater than you anticipated, peak strong? How has the service of the business held up through all of that?

James Foote

executive
#12

I think that the service has held up extremely well. It can always be better. We would always like to reach perfection. But the ability of the rail industry and CSX, in particular, to be able to pivot and respond in the manner in which we did, I think, says a lot about the transformation of the railroads to be much more nimble and be able to respond to the ups and downs and gyrations that in the past would have created a lot more service challenges for our customers than what we're seeing right now.

Justin Long

analyst
#13

And I think at the end of the last quarter, from a trip plan compliance perspective, you said that you were around 80% for carload, around 90% for intermodal. When you look at those numbers here in the fourth quarter, have you seen them improve at all? Have they been stable? Is there any color you can give us there?

James Foote

executive
#14

I think that's a good range. It's still not where we want them to be. I think I said we'll get back to where we were, and we'll get -- and we'll improve from there. We're not immune. Our employees are not immune from COVID. Sometimes, I think, based upon the number of cases, we should have developed herd immunity by now, but we're like everybody else. We're a long, long, long ways away from that. So we have our day-to-day challenges on parts of the railroad. And -- but I think we're working through that the best we can. We expect to meet our customers' demands for peak. But again, it's a challenging environment. And we have to balance the needs of our employees, our workforce, our customers and the communities every single day.

Justin Long

analyst
#15

Maybe we could shift to truckload conversions and the opportunity there. I know that's something that you've highlighted repeatedly over the course of the last few earnings calls. But could you just talk about what you're seeing today in terms of truckload conversions? Are you seeing the pace of that activity accelerate here in the third and fourth quarter? And if so, in what areas?

James Foote

executive
#16

I've been talking about truckload conversions probably for 20 years. The beauty of the, call it, scheduled railroad model or whatever you want to refer to it as, is the enormous improvement in the service reliability that we're able to generate and the benefits that, that has primarily for our carload shippers and so the truck converting business back from the highway that, in more cases than not, at one point in time in history, was probably moved in a railcar, is a huge priority for us because you couldn't compete in that market when your service was not reliable enough, that our customer could not trust us to get his product to his customer. So yes, we are continuing to grind that out and continuing to convert traffic back to rail. And these are customers that today have a plant or a factory some place, where on one side of their plant, they have rail doors, and on the other side of the plant, they have truck doors. And so they're used to shipping by rail. And so getting in there and proving to them with new lanes or lanes they haven't used rail on for a long time is we're making progress. But we have to prove ourselves, as simple as that. This is not something where you can just go flip a switch.

Justin Long

analyst
#17

And you've talked about that market share percentage for rail. Looking at the transportation market as a whole, it's a very small piece of the pie, less than 10%. But when you look specifically at your customers, how do you typically see that? Or what do you typically see in terms of that percentage of their freight that's allocated towards rail? And any thoughts like, on average, on where that could go? Because I know this is something that you've been pushing for a while. You've been pitching this conversion story. So just wondering if you can put some more numbers around that.

James Foote

executive
#18

Probably in a customer location -- and you have to take it by location because you have to take it by commodity. But in certain commodities, where we think we're -- we historically have thought we were doing a really good job and you go in and you talk to the logistics manager in charge of meeting the transportation needs across their network of mills or plants or whatever it may be. And we're sitting there at, say, 50%, 51%, 52%, and I say, "How much of that should be moved by rail? How much would you like to move by rail?" And they just look at me like I'm an idiot and they go like, all of it. We'd like to ship everything by rail if we could. You're substantially cheaper. And the reason that, that business migrated away from the railroads over the years was the fact that your service reliability just didn't meet our needs. They now see. They now have not only has our service dramatically improved, but we offer the tools available to them, just like the trucker does, so they can track and trace their equipment. They can keep track of things. They know what's going on. Visibility and not arrogance on the part of the railroad management that says, "Hey, when it gets there, it gets there." And so we're earning that business back. And is it going to be -- are we going to go from 52 to 88 in a year? No. Is 88 is something we should strive for? Absolutely. And I'd like to prove the guy right that we should handle 100% of it. But obviously, there are certain commodities in certain lanes that is always going to be truck, and that's the nature of the beast. But we gave this business away. We gave this business up, and it's our obligation and our responsibility to figure out a way to get it back.

Justin Long

analyst
#19

And obviously, we know in intermodal, there's an opportunity for conversion. But on the general merchandise side, it's significant as well. Within general merchandise, what are the commodities where you see the biggest addressable market for truckload conversions?

James Foote

executive
#20

Again, it's in the business that we handle today, whether it's lumber, paper, pulp, steel, metal, aggregates, things that -- things that we -- these are commodities that we move today that we have, maybe, historically, not -- number one, historically, didn't have a good service product. Number two, historically, didn't invest in the equipment necessary to move it. If we did have equipment, that was probably substandard. And so by working with the customers, we can earn that business back. And that's the primary -- it's a primary focus of ours.

Justin Long

analyst
#21

And do you feel like the biggest hangup for your customers converting freight is just time and people saying that we were in an environment where the freight market was weak, rail volumes were down, and yes, service was good, but volumes were down. But now that's rail volumes have improved. The service has held up pretty well. We could see an inflection point in the conversion story as we look into 2021. Is that a fair way of thinking about it?

James Foote

executive
#22

I think you'll see incremental gains quarter-to-quarter, year-to-year, above historical averages. But I mean, again, if we were growing our carload business, let's just say, at 2%, it's not going to go to 7%. If we can go from 2% to 2.5% to 3.5%, I think those are the kinds of grinded out, blocking and tackling kinds of results that we can look for. So if we can grow -- again, if we were historically -- let's put it in perspective, in the carload business. If we were historically shrinking, we need to turn that around, and we have. So we've gone from historically shrinking, getting smaller year after year to now getting -- stabilizing and beginning to grow year after year. And that is our strategy on the carload business. On the intermodal side, we have a really fantastic, fantastic franchise, serving a ton of customers with, I think, unparalleled service levels with capacity to grow. And so both of those -- both carload and intermodal created a lot of opportunity and potential for us. And our channel partners talk about the opportunities that they see, too, to move more and more things to rail. And whether that be cost savings associated with that, whether that be environmental benefits that are motivating shippers to want to move more and more things more environmentally friendly, whether it be highway congestion, the traditional challenges that our primary competitors face, which is lack of drivers, problems with insurance. The trucking industry seems to be more plagued by challenges year after year, after year, after year, than even the railroad industry does. So -- but we've changed our mindset. We've changed our focus. We've changed the way we want to do business. And I think -- and again, the opportunities there are very good for us.

Justin Long

analyst
#23

On the point about being environmentally friendly and the focus on ESG, is that something that you feel is driving the conversion of freight from truck to rail today? Or is that something that is still on the horizon?

James Foote

executive
#24

I think depending upon the company you're dealing with, one of our customers that we're dealing with, they have all had different philosophies about that for years. This is not new. There were various customers out there that set targets for themselves. There were customers a long time ago, that were planting grass on the roof of their buildings because they wanted to be more environmentally focused. And those were parts of the conversations that we've had for years. And so it's not that they didn't recognize that we were more environmentally friendly. It's not like this was really a shazam moment where it goes like, "Oh, my God, you guys burn only a quarter of the diesel compared to all the trucks that I'm hiring." But then the conversation went, "Yes, but you got to get it there on time. I'd love to use it, but I'm not going to put myself out of business just because I can say I have a lower carbon footprint." So now we're going to come in there with comparable truck-like service, yes, it's a big factor. And it's something that we -- number one, we're proud of as a company and especially as a company that's kind of leading in some of these areas. And so we'd be crazy not to be pitching it and not to be selling it. And there are a lot of -- there are a lot of customers out there -- there are more and more, and more customers, and it will continue to be more and more customers all the time that are focused on ways in which they can benefit the environment. Transportation is a big spend for a lot of our customers. If they can benefit the environment at the same time, they're definitely going to do that.

Justin Long

analyst
#25

Maybe shifting to the excess capacity in the network today. So I did a fireside chat earlier with UP, one of the things they really emphasized was train lengths and a continued opportunity on that front. And I think that's a theme we're seeing in the industry as a whole right now as volumes are coming back, they're getting folded into existing trains, we're blending trains. Any way to help us understand the remaining runway on train lengths and if that opportunity is much different between general merchandise and intermodal. Just curious if there's more of an opportunity in one of those segments.

James Foote

executive
#26

There's opportunity in both segments. The challenges, to a degree, intermodal train length, you got to make sure you got terminal capacity to handle the train to be able to meet the sorts to turn the train, to get the boxes on, get the boxes off. So we don't want to just run long trains for the sake of running long trains and then have them get congested at the terminals. Again, we have to make sure we do this smart because we don't want to jeopardize service just to make sure you got a long train out there. We don't get paid bonus points for running long trains. What we do get paid is providing a good quality customer service product. And if we can do that more efficiently, we can help our customers be more competitive. But we're always looking at it. We have capacity to run longer trains. We're continually running longer trains. But at the same time, we need to make sure that we keep our service metrics in line with where our customers expect them to be and as I said at the very beginning, make sure that we continue to improve on those service metrics over time.

Justin Long

analyst
#27

And just strategically, as you think about growth, is there more of an emphasis in general merchandise versus intermodal? Or would you say that you're kind of spending an equal amount of time on talking to customers about converting freight in both of those segments?

James Foote

executive
#28

2/3 of my franchise is merchandise. I spent 2/3 of my time on merchandise.

Justin Long

analyst
#29

Easy enough.

James Foote

executive
#30

Yes. Mark and -- Mark does, too. So it's a big opportunity for us. It's a big focus for us. You guys look at the revenue per unit, the difference between the 2. My god, if we grow intermodal -- if we grow intermodal faster than merchandise, we're horrible because our mix is all screwed up. So it's a big part of our business. It's a very, very good part of our business in merchandise. And it lends itself. Again, when you roll out -- when you change your operating philosophy, and you begin to eliminate all these unnecessary touches across the network. I think, I mean, we eliminated all unnecessary touches. We don't [ haul ] intermodal trains. So I guess we benefited from -- we don't have cold trains. That's who benefited from the overall service improvements and efficiencies when we changed the operating network. Shazam, the service levels of the merchandise business improved dramatically. So it's a big, big, big focus of ours. Clearly, what we -- we don't want people to misinterpret that, that we don't like intermodal or something like that? No. It's -- that's a big, big part of our business, too. It just happens to be a smaller part of our business.

Justin Long

analyst
#31

And your eastern competitor has actually announced some lanes, new lanes in intermodal. I'm wondering if that's something that we could see in CSX's network as well. I know a big focus of yours for some time was to rightsize that intermodal business and essentially trim it down. But are we to a point where that process has been complete and now we might actually see some lanes reopen? Or how do we think about that?

James Foote

executive
#32

Well, I think you have to look at the overall economic environment, and it's dynamic. The world changes. Volume growth in certain commodity areas change over time. Ports, sizes -- the ports go up, go down, people want to go from east to -- the east coast to the center part of the country versus the west to the center part of the country. It's a dynamic environment. What we did when we reengineered the intermodal network was to eliminate the multiple handling of containers as they moved across our network because it wasn't necessarily that the traffic didn't want to go from point A to point B, but we were taking it from point A to point A1 to point A2 to point A3 before we got to B. And it was a question of the cost associated with trying to do that to basically artificially create growth, that's what we eliminated. There has always been a focus. If there's enough volume in a lane that has density where we want -- we think we can offer a product, clearly, we would look at it. So I wouldn't be surprised if we open up shipping from different locations because the market grows there. To a degree, it could be -- people are building -- people are building distribution facilities in places where they didn't exist before. People are putting in big box stores in places where they didn't exist before. Nashville, a couple of years ago was a different city than it is today. So is it -- would it be unreasonable to think like, "Oh, maybe we should go to Nashville. Well, geez, are you guys opening up lanes? No, there's a new market there. We want to get into the market. Guess what, we're in the transportation business. People are moving goods from -- to a place where they didn't move them before." So obviously, we would look at those markets. And if it made sense and we could compete, that's what we'd do.

Justin Long

analyst
#33

Thinking about the pricing environment as we get into next year, obviously, the truckload market has improved. Capacity is tight there. The service product for CSX is strong. So it feels like there should be some nice momentum. When you think about pricing in general merchandise versus intermodal, do you think the pricing trends will look similar into 2021? Or with intermodal, I know it's a bit more price sensitive. Just wondering if you -- we could see a kind of divergence in the trends on pricing?

James Foote

executive
#34

Well, in general, first of all, we don't talk about pricing too much. But in general, again, we think that we price to the value of our service. And to the extent that our service gets better, we should be able to price more. We don't look at the dial-a-truck prices on an hourly basis to try and figure out what the market spot price is. That's really not the nature of the way we do business. We have long-term relationships with customers. And so price increases, it will -- should continue to be consistent with what they've been over the last couple of years at CSX.

Justin Long

analyst
#35

And are you pretty pleased with your IMC relationships right now? Maybe you could just talk about the service that you're seeing out there with those companies that you work with as well?

James Foote

executive
#36

Oh my gosh, our relationships with IMCs, they are absolutely our best buddies. We work together as partners in a -- to provide a joint transportation product. That's simply what it is. It starts on a truck and it ends on a truck. And if they can use rail, they use rail. And by working together, we hope that between the 2 of us, we can grow together. That's the relationship. And then we argue about who gets what piece of the pie, as simple as that. So yes, I think as our service levels, clearly, we hit some difficult times with some of our IMCs as we were just talking about, when we were somewhat changing and rationalizing, whatever term you want to use, how we did business in certain markets. It was disruptive. But I think we're clearly back on a very good footing, with all of our customers. And we want to grow together. And we want to develop these new markets that we were talking about. And we want to be bigger players in e-commerce. And develop new products that can be competitive in these marketplaces. So I think we're really -- and as I said earlier, they have challenges, whether it be drivers or whatever it might be, or government regulations changing the way they have to do business. So I think they lean on us to get the job done. And to a certain degree, we lean on them to help us get done on the first mile, last mile, what we don't do. So it's a good, healthy relationship. I think -- look at the volume growth in intermodal right now, we're doing things from a service standpoint to help them serve their customers. In a way, I think that has to be -- they have to be pleased and surprised about how we've been able to respond.

Justin Long

analyst
#37

Great. And maybe shifting to coal, I know the view from CSX is, longer term, that market will continue to be pressured. But it sounds like there are some structural changes that you've been implementing this year, and I know you probably don't want to go into the details around all of that. But as we look into next year and beyond, on the heels of those changes you've made within the coal franchise, is it reasonable to expect that your coal business can outperform the market going forward?

James Foote

executive
#38

Which market? Domestic? Export?

Justin Long

analyst
#39

I guess both.

James Foote

executive
#40

Again, there's huge challenges in both things. I think as we have changed -- we've changed. CSX is a changed -- different company than it was a few years ago. We view things slightly different, not just from a service standpoint, but from a market -- marketing strategy standpoint as well. We have new people in key roles in just about every key role in the organization. We have new people with different thoughts on how to do things differently than the way it's always been done. I think we have a bit -- much clearer vision of the global markets. We recognize our -- the U.S. coal industry's place in the global markets. And our challenge is to leverage what we've done on our service and cost side to prove that we're a reliable source for export coal. And again, align ourselves with expanding or changing markets. But at the end of the day, we're kind of at the mercy of global demand, global steel demand, global demand for electricity, price of gas in Russia and all those kinds of things that we don't have a lot of control over. And then on the domestic side, on the electric utility side, that's going to continue to be a challenge for us. I don't know if -- I don't know what natural gas prices are going to be a year or 2 from now, whether or not coal is going to continue to remain reasonably competitive. But our challenge in both markets here is to make sure that we are forward thinking. We understand the dynamics of the market and change appropriately so we can meet the needs from a service standpoint and understand the changing dynamics so we can adapt and continue to participate in which still a very, very good piece of our business for as long as we possibly can.

Justin Long

analyst
#41

I know the cash flow profile of the business is something that CSX has really been focused on highlighting, and I think it's an important part of the story. Last quarter, you authorized the buyback, the $5 billion buyback incrementally. Now that we're through the election, we have some data points on a vaccine, is it reasonable to expect you to get more aggressive, putting that buyback program to work? Or how do you think about the pace of allocating that program?

James Foote

executive
#42

Well, we didn't pull out or suspend our share buyback because of a change in philosophy or a lack of available cash to be used for that purpose. We suspended our share buyback because with all of the uncertainty, it was just the prudent thing to do. We -- a while ago, told everybody, we were back in the market but being more opportunistic. And so I think that's the case going forward. That's our philosophy. We generate a lot of cash flow. I think you should all recommend and look at companies based upon their free cash flow versus their earnings per share. I'd be very, very pleased to -- if everybody did that. And then -- so our first call on cash, obviously, is to maintain the railroad, which we were doing a really good -- really, really good job there. We're spending more money to improve and maintain the railroad. We're doing more in terms of what we're installing in terms of a rail ties, ballast, et cetera, than had historically been done at CSX. But the kind of philosophy in terms of efficiency that we applied to running the trains is what we do to apply to how we install rail and ties. So we get more done for less. And so first thing, make sure we keep the railroad in great shape, be in a position to serve our customers' needs. And then after that, it's invest in opportunities to grow if they have the appropriate level of return that makes sense. And trust me, trying to get a dollar out of Kevin is tough, but he continues to find extremely high-return projects for us to invest in. And after that, as we've always said, our philosophy has been -- then we return that cash in some way shape or form to our shareholders. And so nothing's changed. We have the authority. And we'll be there doing that at various different degrees as we go forward.

Justin Long

analyst
#43

On the topic of capital allocation, there have been headlines around Pan-Am. You guys have addressed that, so I'm not going to ask about it. But I did want to ask just bigger picture about Class I mergers and M&A and just coming out of this pandemic, knock on wood, have your views around that changed at all? I mean, is that something that CSX would be interested in pursuing in the years ahead?

James Foote

executive
#44

I don't see anything near term. You can never say what's going to happen down the road. But I think I said in the last earnings call, I think there's a changed mindset in the industry right now in terms of how to work -- an exciting time, really, an exciting time for all the individual railroad companies, the industry, our customers. In a way, we are working together and collaborating more with a focus on service, not just on our own companies, but jointly. 50% of our traffic either originates or terminates on a connecting railroad. So we can have really, really great service. But if the -- but if our connecting partner doesn't, then so much -- so what, our service really isn't any good. So I think this common mindset that you see across the industry by not only the Class Is, but the regional players as well, it bodes well for opportunities for us to get some of those -- get a lot of those synergies that traditionally, the mindset, I think the railroad managements would have been -- well, the only way we can get those synergies is by having us controlling the single-line move and us consolidating our G&A into one. We can do this, we can do that, and we'll get better. I think we can get a lot of those values without having to resort to going down the M&A route, not to say that's not a logical approach. Some might differ with me. I just think that there's a tremendous amount of things that we can do. And the more and more -- like I say, the more and more we become like-minded in the way we approach the business, the better it is for everyone. Clearly, the railroads run better today with a smaller number of railroads than they did back in 1980 when there were 61 or 62 Class I railroads. Geez, unless you want to go back to that day? I mean, it was disjointed, dysfunctional. And the railroads kept losing market share, market share, market share because they didn't run very well. So we've got ourselves in a good spot right now. We're focusing on the right things to do. And we can continue, I believe, to find opportunities and synergies as we move forward that traditionally, I think most people thought the only way to get that is by merging.

Justin Long

analyst
#45

Maybe as we close with one last question, the election is now behind us, I guess, depending on who you talk to. But any kind of high-level thoughts on how the outcome of the election could impact your business, whether it's regulation or anything else we should be mindful of looking into next year and beyond?

James Foote

executive
#46

Oh, not until next year. I mean, we've gone through -- we do this all the time. The railroads have been around forever. So I guess we'd have to go back and see what the change was from a -- during -- from the Truman administration to whatever administration. So we've been through this all the time. Sometimes, there's a more interest in -- I think the biggest thing from any industry, and it's probably not just the railroads, the biggest thing from anybody who's regulated and has a regulator is, is there going to be more of a focus on having more regulation on how we run the business. Is it going to be less? But we get through all of that, like everybody else does. And so I don't see anything -- I don't see anything that it would dramatically change the way we run the company, whether or not -- when the new administration, whenever that might be or whoever that might be, comes to power.

Justin Long

analyst
#47

Well, Jim, I think we're out of time, so I'm going to leave it at that, but it's great to see you. I really appreciate your time today, and wish you the best of luck headed into year-end. And everyone that dialed in, thanks for joining us. Hope you have a great rest of the week. Enjoy the conference, and we'll talk soon.

James Foote

executive
#48

Thank you very much for the time.

Justin Long

analyst
#49

Thanks, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete CSX Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to CSX Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.