Cummins Inc. (CMI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 16, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Machinery conference_presentation 28 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Adam Seiden

analyst
#1

Great. Well, thanks, everybody, for joining us for this 2:50 Eastern session here at the Barclays Industrial Select Conference. My name is Adam Seiden. I'm the U.S. machinery and construction analyst at Barclays and our equity research group. We're pleased to have with us in this session Cummins. Joining us from Cummins is Chief Financial Officer, Mark Smith; as well as from the IR team, we have Jack Kienzler. So just some administrative housing notes here. For those that have participated in person with us before in Miami, we generally do -- we normally do have an audience response system. That has been moved virtual and online, and you'll see that to the right side of your screen. If you could take a few moments during this presentation to fill up those questions, we would certainly appreciate that, and we'll be happy to share with you the results on the back end. One last thing also. [Technical Difficulty] Okay. Sorry about that, folks. Just some technical difficulties on our side. So for those that want to ask questions, please send a message to adam.seiden@barclays.com, and I'm happy to answer those questions -- or ask those questions for you. So with that, I wanted to welcome Mark Smith from Cummins. And Mark, welcome back again to our conference, albeit virtually. And for those that are new in the room, if you wouldn't mind just giving a quick a quick overview of what the company is, and then we'll dive into some Q&A.

Mark Smith

executive
#2

Will do, Adam, and thanks for inviting us again this year. So Cummins is a global power provider, yes, in the ballpark of $20 billion-plus of revenue this year. Broadly, 70% of our revenue is serving commercial vehicle markets on-highway and roughly about 30% off-highway serving construction, power generation, mining, oil and gas, agriculture and other markets. I better mention them all, otherwise, I'll be in trouble back at base. Yes, but basically, we've been historically providing diesel, natural gas engines and related systems, and then over the past few years, also increasing our investment in battery electric and, more recently, in hydrogen-based technologies for the future. So that's -- we are basically supplying most of the largest global truck OEMs, some degree of product in most parts of the world, whether that's through our wholly owned operations or our joint ventures.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#3

Great. Well, so first off, congratulations on a nice year, particularly given the circumstances. You guys deserve it. You picked up CFO responsibilities in 2019, and you're immediately created with the prospect of a truck cycle and then COVID. So welcome to the job. And it also -- you saw a pretty nice size decline in dollars for Cummins on sales. Now with that all, Cummins has handled it, I think, pretty admirably. But my first question would be about how did the preparation for an eventual cyclical turn do you think that helped Cummins prepare for what happened to be a very tough time for the industry and for the business as well in the last year.

Mark Smith

executive
#4

Yes. I think you [ ticked ] an important point. I think the key was we'd already started preparing for a typical -- whatever typical cyclical slowdown is at least the core markets in North America, called that out, said we had a plan, executed that across multiple parts of our business. And what that meant is when we got to the depths of uncertainty here around about the end of March, April time frame, we pulled some extra temporary levers, but we didn't have to make any more kind of knee-jerk reactions to disrupt the overall kind of ongoing performance of the company. Because a key part of what we do is long-range engineering, right? If we disrupt those programs or our workforce too much, that can have longer-term consequences. So we were able to adapt. I mean, we've got a leadership team through multiple cycles now. This is my 25th year. That's not unique at Cummins, lots of long tenure. We know what to do. And the principal challenge, how do we reprioritize and what do we go faster on and what do we go slower on so that we don't shut up all the future opportunities while we're managing through. And on top of that, we had some particular issues within the distribution business. We've had momentum for a couple of years. We've seen nicely growing margins there as well, which were separate to the broader restructuring. So overall, yes, we reacted well. Remarkable that we went from shutdown in operations in China in February and March, to all-time record performance. And yes, we have a lot of operations in Wuhan itself. So to think that we could end up with a remarkable set of results that we had, hats off. It's been a tough year for many employees, and particularly our people in supply chain and manufacturing basically shutting down globally, and then ramping back up at the fastest pace in company history. As you said, it was the largest decline in the company's history for the full year. But then in the second half of the year, the fastest rate of ramp-up. Yes, challenge, better [ class ] of problem to have going into 2021, and we can count up with our global employee base, kind of look upwards now and onwards. And yes, it took some extra actions to push that over the long-term liquidity and financial strength as well. So overall, it seems more orderly now when we booked all the numbers. But yes, March and April was the most unknown period we've had, I think, in our history of what was going to happen next.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#5

Got it. So the company has certainly made a point of growing -- or being able to grow earnings trough over trough and has done a great job. For now, though, with the market trending up, I just want to take a look at the other direction because, like you said, you've seen a very nice size snapback. So when -- if you start looking at peak on peak, I mean, how much is -- I don't know if you can answer this, but how much above prior company peaks should we be thinking about Cummins being able to grow the business, having done what you've done on the ops end of the spectrum here?

Mark Smith

executive
#6

Yes. So I think we're always trying to drive those incremental margins as strong as we can. We've talked typically about trying to drive 20% plus over the long run. It's ironic, we finished 2020 with $12.01 EPS. $12 used to be some of the peak estimates right among some of your peers for our performance. And again, we didn't know that. Back in '15, we were being asked if we could ever get back to $9 again. I think the key is we found ways to keep growing at it. So when the truck sit, even if when they're really deep, we're troughing -- even if the markets themselves are troughing at similar levels, the overall revenue level for the company is troughing it. The trucks are getting shallower for us. And so therefore, we've got more potential on the upside to keep growing. The emerging markets have been an important part of our story, never more seen than last year with record performance in China. Still a few more late legs to go with -- particularly in the Components business here. And then I'm sure we'll get on the new technologies in a moment, but we've believed for a long time that we've got a compelling economic case to convince customers to have us make more of the combustion engines. Again, as also the new technology, and you saw recently the announcement with Isuzu, found a way to convince them. There's a win-win there. And we're hoping to do that with more customers so that we can keep growing in the combustion engine space for quite some time to come because, today, that's what's paying all the bills. That's what's generating more than 100% of the cash. We don't need all of that cash in our core business. We can fund the investment in the new technology and return cash to shareholders. So yes, we are definitely trying to squeeze more out. The big push and pull in the company is really squeezing more out of the base and enhancing its future prospect while funding that new technology. And now those discussions are a lot harder when the revenue is down. And it's the easier when the revenue is up. You still have to make good decisions, but it's a little bit easier. That's the basic formula. So as the revenues go, the incrementals and decrementals, little odd last year, was extraordinary because of some of the measures we took. But I think if we look over a multiyear period, we'd set by those longer-term trends. I think that, that's 20%-plus incrementals on the way up. And hopefully, we keep growing that top line of the company in both various cycles. That's the way I think about it.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#7

Got it. And you were talking about squeezing more out of the business in the base business and so forth. And certainly, on the call, you were talking about the potential to get back to that low 30% range incrementally if you get a 5%, 10% kicker in sales. So I guess the question is, from your view, what will it take to get sales higher? Because like I think about from like -- you mentioned Isuzu earlier, product wins, is that too -- is it too late to get new product wins that affect 2021? Or like, is it going to be a matter of the supply chain and clearing up for some of your customers? Just trying to get a sense of like what are the different avenues that ultimately would make you more constructive on some of the growth in the business.

Mark Smith

executive
#8

I think right now, we're in the eye of the up cycle, right? We laid out our different assumptions, but the honest answer is we've just come up a couple of quarters of the record ramp-up. So yes, it's really the markets themselves -- we can add to that, but the markets themselves are going to drive most of the growth. We've already positioned our products and our Components business now with the new regulations. So really, it's a battle with the supply chain. And I think I'm imagining it's not only Cummins that's seeing some tightness in the supply chain right now. Part of it is specific. Part of it is just general absenteeism of restrictions on COVID-related work environments. Again, we battled through. Our Q4 revenues 2020 annualized were $23 billion, not far up, kind of in a record pace. It's hard to imagine, 6 months, but that's where we were. And yes, a lot of markets are moving up, so that is putting pressure on supply chain. So far, we've managed through. It hasn't been perfect, but it's added a little bit more cost to our business, quite a little bit more stress on the supply chain side. But I think that's the barrier to going significantly higher. And it feels like demand is pretty robust in a number of markets as we speak today.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#9

Got it. So maybe just to dive into some of the regions on China. You guys gave your assumptions. You gave plenty of great forecast for us to model off of and think about. And one of those was in China. You were talking about a second half slowdown, partly regulation driven, and then potentially lower government stimulus for some of the off-highway stuff. So given how that business has defied expectations over the last couple of years, just when do you feel like you guys have true visibility on what the order flow could be for that? Or is it not until it kind of happens sort of thing in that region specifically?

Mark Smith

executive
#10

Most of our on-highway markets, we're operating on like a couple of weeks lead time. So we're very much -- backlog doesn't really exist. And that's one of the things our customers value from us, is the flexibility of our supply chain. But I would say sentiment is cautious in the second half given China has been on such [ tear ] on multiple end markets of what we might call the older economy, industrial economy. But those are not facts. That's an assumption. It's a big one. We made it visible to investors. It's not here yet. And so partly, it's driven on just every time we stare at the chart, it's gone to levels we've never seen before on the back of a couple of strong years. We know what usually happens in most of our markets [indiscernible] or the leveling off in the need for extra trucks. And then there were incentives last year for scrapping vehicles. We think that added about 300,000 units to the market size. And then the price of trucks should be going up in the middle of the year to account for the new emissions regulations. So generally, that's a combination of factors that suggest to us it's plausible for a significant reduction. But probably China, more so than any other market, the government stimulus has an effective way of impacting parts of the economy more than we see in other parts of the world. So that's kind of the [indiscernible]. But for now, you can see from the industry data, January remained fairly robust.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#11

Fair. And just -- maybe just on the emission standards, I think it was helpful on the call, you guys gave some good color as far as what after-treatment revenue could mean, and it's around $250 million. So could you give us a sense of like what type of [ time line ] this creates? Or like what -- how many $250 million opportunities are there? Or just in general, how long does this take to play out over time for folks like yourself?

Mark Smith

executive
#12

I think between China and India, that's probably another 12 to 18 months before we get back to reasonable market sizes again and then see those markets fully adopt. And yes, one of the great things about most of the emerging markets, when they enforce a regulation and technology is being adopted, I think social pressure has changed in developing markets, just like it's changed in developed markets. And so there's a big push to clean up the environment through cleaner technologies like we provide. I think beyond that, we continue to see progression in vehicle and equipment development. So we've got high hopes for the automated transmission business and our joint venture with Eaton. Again, that was the goal. We thought we had good strong partnerships in China and technology in the JV. We thought that would be a good combination, and we're starting to see a lot more interest there, sophistication and move towards total cost of ownership increase. So that's definitely one area where we continue to grow. And then again, we'll talk more, I'm sure, about the New Power. We've got a lot of relationships in developing markets. So maybe we can't call China developing market anymore. It's a big market, maybe more so than a lot of the Western players, and we -- our Components business, I think, stacks at very favorably compared to others in our industry, partly because we've got these big engine partnerships. And that's leading here. You've seen -- maybe saw a little bit about our ongoing discussions with Sinopec. So as China starts to build out alternate energy economy, can we be a good partner in facilitating that? Certainly for international companies, we think we've got as good a prospect as anybody else to help combine with some of the new technologies that we acquired over the last couple of years.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#13

So maybe that's a good transition. We'll go a bit into New Power and talk about the different [ lags ] there. So first, maybe just something from the other week, with Amazon, we saw an order for 1,000 engines with their JV on Westport. Could you talk about what an order like that means for the company in terms of being able to scale that up further? And then we haven't heard you guys talk as much about the natural gas market. It's been obviously focused in a bunch of different areas. So how much of this -- how much does that area remain a focus versus some of the other new technologies that you do find yourself talking about more?

Mark Smith

executive
#14

I think natural gas can play an important role, especially people want different alternatives to diesel. Some are economic, and many of them are not -- obviously, not in the money today. Natural gas is one that can be. And really, we're the leading player in on-highway space. And those engines on the heavy-duty side, they're running down our Jamestown manufacturing facility just like the 15-liter diesel are. So incrementally, I think they're important for that market to win more business there. But for Cummins, it's just part of what we do. And I think you will see a growing presence from Cummins on natural gas going forward, not just in the U.S., but in other markets.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#15

Got it. So maybe here's -- maybe there's definitely some new listeners on this call. So maybe could you just talk a bit about the strength of the hydrogen portfolio? You hosted Hydrogen Day. Your Hydrogenics partnership, the PEM technology, fuel cells, clearly a very wide net here. But really, so for the listeners, to think like what really differentiates the Cummins business versus some of the other headlines that we see across here.

Mark Smith

executive
#16

And like all new things, there's a lot of noise and a lot of enthusiasm, which is great to see, but we have to acknowledge all of those with some of these new technologies. So one of the things we liked about Hydrogenics was acquired into the heavy electrolyzer technology. So we've got this ability to generate green hydrogen, along with the fuel cell technologies that ultimately will power equipment and vehicles around the globe. So we thought that would lend itself to generating revenue, which is an important part of growing a new business. I would say probably the enthusiasm has only grown since we continue that, and we've got some of the largest electrolyzers or installations in the world in operation today, which is important, as an incumbent. I think we see that as the electrolyzer business, not only the near-term revenue growth opportunity, but also, it's a way for us to build our credibility more broadly in a broader industrial economy. I think when we combine that with some of the partnerships we have around the world, I think that can help. The only cents there on the fuel cell side is that the applications in our markets are more in the off-highway side, the commercial application where you can deal more practically with the fuel supply, right? We don't -- you can have infrastructure at one end of the train [ and one ] on another one, just use a simple example. But again, the more we've got those in play, the more we've got electrolyzer capability in play around the world. We think that builds our credibility and builds our learning. So again, there are hurdles, right? We'd all look to say, yes, the truck market's moving along, and we've landed x thousands of units. That's not where that industry is right now. We're going to need more -- as we see in new technologies, we're going to see more innovation in cost and performance over time. But we feel confident in what we're doing right now. We've got a lot of investment needs. And as I said at the start, the great thing for us is we generate more cash in our base business than we need to fund them. But even though we've got aspirations to keep growing combustion engine, we can cope with all of this. Today, it's more a question of the engineering budgets and the margin profile of the overall company. And one of the reasons we broke it out, Adam, is so that investors can measure us on performing and improving in the established business, and then they can see how much progress we're making over time. But the barriers -- the opportunities that we offer beyond the technologies themselves is we are, for many industries, the natural supply chain partner of choice because many of our customers don't operate in just one market. They operate in many. And we're there. We've got an established distribution network. That means we can support our products wherever they are in service, which I think that is going to be a challenge for a nonproprietary, nonestablished technology player in a lot of our markets. So -- and I think the other thing we bring almost more than any other player in our industries, we have so much [ application ] knowledge of how these vehicles and pieces of equipment work, whether it's in mining, construction. That doesn't mean everybody is going to give every approach to take order to us, although we necessarily want everyone. But I think these things -- and customers know Cummins is going to be around for a long, long time, and we have these strong relationships. So again, we've got to keep developing the technology and [ count them ] winning out.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#17

Got it. So let's -- just thinking out of ways. If you were to think out a bit of a ways here, it's 2021. There's going to be lots of iterations of technology to come as time progresses. So when you think about where the industry ultimately ends up, whether it's on-highway, whether it's off-highway, where -- do you think that we're going to get to a place where there's going to be a dominant technology like the internal combustion engine is? Or are we going to be living in a world where you're going to have multiple modes? And if that's the case, like, how long does it take to get to somewhere where there is just that purely dominant technology? Any thoughts, guesstimates, things like that, is what I guess I'm after.

Mark Smith

executive
#18

Yes. So I think it's hard to imagine a scenario in which this duplicate infrastructure, right? So we might navigate from diesel or natural gas to a and other, but it's hard to imagine where fully battery electric and all the charging needs and hydrogen fueling stations, all of that infrastructure get built for all the different applications. So that's hard to imagine. Of course, right now, the combustion engine is dominant. And I think until we have even tighter regulations and maybe some more incentives of carrots and sticks to push along the adoption, we're going to have variants of combustion engines, natural gas diesel and maybe some versions of hybridization persisting for quite a long time in some of the higher energy density applications. I think that's the reality. And we're hoping -- if we can pick up more diesel engine business along the way, that's going to reinforce our economic advantage and provide more economic fuel towards to keep developing those other [ alternatives ]. But it's hard to think people are going to invest in multiple types of it. They might navigate from one to another, but that's also going to need a lot of help. And that's not me being bearish. I think that's just a practical knowledge. I would challenge you to find anyone who's saying that there's a clear TCO advantage for some of these new technologies in the high end of the application. And that's understandable. We're early days. But yes, if things go faster, yes, we probably would have to invest more. So that's -- I guess that's one of the -- the risks of the upside is we could pick up more diesel sooner, but we might have to invest more. So those are the things we're always trying to weigh internally. But relative to a complete new start-up, we've got a lot of advantages as a natural supply chain partner. The challenge in our industry is proprietary rarely lends itself to scale because truck volumes are not the same as passenger car. We don't have a lot of history of the exact same technologies transferring over. And again, some of those things could change, but that's the challenge that everyone going to a propriety are saying they are, will it be economic in the long run.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#19

Yes. I guess maybe barring on that question would be, so if we're not going to see something, it doesn't feel like we'd see a bifurcation. Eventually, we'll get somewhere -- because like I agree with what you said that there's a whole lot of investment that's needed. So -- on infrastructure. So could there be any variation though amongst regions, just given that regulatory policy is pushing them in certain places? Where does that sit? And then I guess the second part of that would be like, what's the tipping point here? Like, is it cost? You mentioned TCO? Is it cost? Is it regulation, which may influence cost? Or like, is it the customer? Just what generally do you think is going to be the tipping point that gets you into -- or gets the industry, really, into one place or the other?

Mark Smith

executive
#20

My knowledge of -- let's just take on-highway as an example. My knowledge of most operators of trucks, even the most efficient, highly sophisticated largest fleets is their margin aren't enormous. And so at least when they're making a decision whether to buy a Cummins power or somebody else's power, even within the same technology space. There's a whole set of considerations that go in to say, is this economic or not? They're constantly trying to squeeze out efficiencies. And so history hasn't shown enormous year-to-year changes in prices of trucks easily being absorbed by many markets. I think cost is part of it. I think there are many examples in the world where new technology costs come down a lot. But if we want to go faster and we need infrastructure, some form of support other than just punishing regulations, I suspect, will be needed. That's my view and maybe shared by a few of my colleagues. So it'll be interesting. And again, in the U.S., the focus -- and again, it's just a statement of fact. There hasn't been a lot of focus on stimulating a lot more changes in regulations. It's more not adding to them, I would say. And at the end of the day, the economic change away from combustion engine has to come along with the societal -- societal preference for less diesel, no matter how much cleaner it gets. And again, we're not standing still on the combustion engine side either. We're increasingly investing to make them even more efficient. So that, I think that's probably surprised that some of the new players on the battery electric side, that diesel hasn't. So whatever they're plugged into the spreadsheets, the economics of continuing to advance still on the combustion engines. Again, we're enthusiastic about the new. It's going to be a longer journey, and we've got to be a little bit more patient with those investments right now. But that's -- yes, these are the basic questions facing the company today.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#21

Got it. Okay. Well, I think with that, we are at about time. So we'll finish off there. I appreciate again, Mark, you guys joining us, the broader Cummins team, Jack, everybody, and hopefully next year, Miami.

Mark Smith

executive
#22

Absolutely. Well, thanks to you, Adam. Apologies for the animal background noises. But thanks.

Adam Seiden

analyst
#23

It's okay.

Jack Kienzler

executive
#24

Thanks, Adam.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Cummins Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Cummins Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.