Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 25, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Myles Walton
analystOkay. Great. So we're going to go ahead and get started. Thanks so much for joining us. Next up, we have Curtiss-Wright and from the company, you've got Lynn Bamford, and we've got Chris Farkas. And so thank you so much for joining us. We're going to go through some fireside chat questions. But as usual, any questions from the audience are always welcome to make it more engaging as an participation.
Myles Walton
analystBut I would love to start off, Lynn, maybe with the defense side of the portfolio and the supply chain, which Defense Electronics, in particular, has been probably most impacted. Give us a status update of where that is, how it's recovering relative to your expectations? And also, when would this not be a topic, I'll have to ask.
Lynn Bamford
executiveBut I would say very much appreciate that. And thank you for being here today. It's definitely our pleasure and welcome to everybody who's here. I think before we start, I would just like to make a comment that our safe harbor statement applies. And today's discussion may include some forward-looking statements that are covered in our -- which contain risks and uncertainties, which are covered in our SEC filings, which are on our website. So just to get that out of the way. Now on to your question, which is on Defense Electronics. And yes, it is -- when this began in '21, I didn't think we'd be sitting here in '23 and still talking about it. I would say, as we talked about on our Q1 earnings call, and have been talking about for a year. There's a lot of things we monitor in this area. We monitor the on-time delivery of our suppliers, their decommits. We track lead times, in what direction they're going and our ability to pull in and push out. And so from a quantitative standpoint, we definitely see -- saw the trends beginning to improve in Q1. That's improving into Q2. So we feel very positive about that. And then more on a qualitative position that as we just have continuous engagements with our supply base, they're willingness and leaning forward on working with us with -- in adjusting delivery dates to meet our needs has definitely taken a meaningful change in the right direction. So we do feel positive about the direction and the continued improvement in the supply chain. Lead times are still definitely longer than they were. They're maybe halfway back from what would have been the norm in 2019 to kind of the worst case. And that's obviously a generality, but kind of broadly speaking. And so we'll see. I don't know when they will be back to the 2019 levels or if we'll get all the way back there in the foreseeable future. But I'm really proud of how we've managed it as a team. New systems, we've put in place new tools, leverage some AI to help us really manage our supply chain that have gotten us to a place where we feel pretty comfortable how we're managing the situation. So still some uncertainties. I'm not trying to paint an over rosy picture, but very different than 6, 9 months ago. So with that, just to comment on Q1 and some of those uncertainties, our revenue was up in Q1, 13% year-over-year, and yet our margins were down. And I know that's caused a few people to have some questions. I guess, to comment on that, it was coming off of Q4, where we were almost 30% operating margin. There's really nothing fundamental going on in this business that just truly mix and a couple of under absorptions and a few teams that drove that, that when I look into the next quarter and into the full year, we gave slightly wider than normal guidance at the beginning of the year to account for the uncertainty in the supply chain. Our order book has remained strong. Our staffing levels are good, that we really feel like we can see line of sight to driving towards the top end of that full year guidance at this juncture. And equally important, really have a solid line of sight on operating margins and getting to that 22.7% to 22.9% guide that we put out in the year. So the business is healthy. There's nothing systemic. We have no program issues going on, just really a mix issue coming off of such a profitable Q4.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. And it also sounded like last year, you had a much steeper ramp in the fourth quarter margin. Needing to get to that near 30% to pull off the year. Is that something that is also the frame of reference for this year? Or are you going to be able to sort of have a bit of a smoother cadence through the course of the year of improvement?
Lynn Bamford
executiveSo a smoother cadence. Historically, this business has always been slightly more heavily weighted in the back half than the first half. I think we're going to get back to that more traditional cadence. And so less dramatic as was in '22. So we're doing a lot of work to really try and drive that. I think we're going to see really solid sequential improvements quarter-over-quarter going through the back half of this year.
Myles Walton
analystGot it. And maybe sticking with you, Lynn. On the 2023 targets Investor Day, you put them out there and sort of coming up on that. So maybe talk about the upsides opportunity for any of those targets or risks for those targets. And then also just conceptually beyond what you laid out, when would your plan be to sort of set new further goals?
Lynn Bamford
executiveSo first, I'd like to say that we feel really solid on the Pivot to Growth strategy that we put forward in 2021 as really being the right thing for the company for where Curtiss-Wright had evolved to over the years with driving really efficiencies in the organization and getting it to that top quartile financial performer that it was time to put management attention units on growth. And so I think that is a solid position for us that will continue going forward. But to speak more specifically about the 2021 targets, and we have line of sight to achieve all of the targets. I think 4 are much more squarely within our wheelhouse. And I'll talk about the one that doesn't qualify as that last, but we're on track to hit our revenue targets, achieving overall 5% growth with 3% coming -- approximately 3% coming from organic growth. So I feel good about having -- driven that. Drove our operating margin expansion 8% compared to that 5%. So continuing to deliver that strong operating margin performance and keeping us as a top quartile performing operating margin company. We are on track to clearly deliver our 10% or greater EPS accretion year-over-year. So feel good about that. If I take the center of our free cash guide, that puts us at a 3-year average of 108% for free cash flow conversion. We put out a target of 110%. If we were able to reach the top of our guide, we could get to that 110% mark, but that's one that's probably got the most challenge in it at this point, but clearly didn't see the supply chain level of disruption that's really driven some inventory levels that's making that. But the team is focused on it. We're working towards it and doing everything we can to say we hit a full slate of achievement on those targets. So for -- to the other half of your question, towards another target. As I opened, we will stay focused on growing this business. It's the right time. We're in the right end markets. We have the right technology. So it's the time to set that stage for future growth by investing in ourselves and doing those things to capture business and not really having ready to speak to future targets yet, but we're looking towards a May of next year to have another Investor Day and talk about some of the really great things in the business and lay out new targets.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. Maybe to dig a little bit on that without going to a target. But your underlying incremental margin structure, your underlying cash flow conversion structure, your cash flow conversion seems like it sits above your net income just because of the D&A versus CapEx as long as working capital doesn't get too much in the way. Any reason to not think you'll continue to be nicely above net income conversion and free cash flow? And then conversely, on the incremental margin side..
K. Farkas
executiveYes, we've got a strong track record of being above 100% conversion, and we intend to kind of keep it that way. I think we've got opportunity going forward to more closely align our cash flow and our cash flow growth cadence with our sales growth. I mean, it's not always that easy to control with where we sit in the market. But I think there's opportunities just from a growth perspective and then also a working capital management perspective. And if you back up to 2020, I think we're were at a low of 19 -- almost 99 percentage of working capital percentage of sales, and we're at 26.5%. So we clearly see that there's opportunity. This year, we're targeting 200 basis points of production, and we'll continue to drive those systemic improvements to get back to that point. On the incremental -- from an incremental margin standpoint, we'll continue to drive our commercial excellence programs and our excellence programs to free up that money for reinvestment and provide operating margin expansion going forward. We don't have a commitment as to what that will be. But outside of whether it's mix issues or increased R&D investment, 25% to 30% incremental contribution margins is probably the way to think about that.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. One of the reasons why your working capital percent, if I'm following your logic, was lower was because of advances coming off the nuclear side that had since burned off over the last several years, not to leap ahead, but presumption is that you will actually get new orders from a nuclear perspective. Will those come with sizable advances similar to what you've seen in the past? Or will that be more of a neutral to a working capital dynamic?
K. Farkas
executiveI think that that's our objective. I think we've been asked about pricing on the next AP1000 order. We're using the last order as a baseline to say this is what we would expect. So I think it's reasonable to think that we'll be getting cash in advance of a lot of that work that we'll be performing.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. Okay. Just maybe switch to -- once you get the cash, you got to deploy it. So capital allocation preferences, where is the pipeline of M&A that you're looking at today, sort of end market preference, pricing and things like that?
Lynn Bamford
executiveYes. It's definitely an important topic to us and one that we've talked about of the uses of capital. Acquisitions is our top priority for where we want to deploy our capital, again, in a very disciplined and balanced manner that really assures that we drive that strategic fit and the financial fit for the corporation overall. And we like niche IP, high IP capability bolt-ons. ESCO is a great example of that, and they are doing really quite outstanding as an addition to our portfolio. We clearly will look and make initial indications of interest on definitely double-digit numbers of properties usually before we find one that we want to take across the finish line, and we're not going to change that rigor. I mean we're very conscious of the cost of capital having increased. And so that makes the analysis and what you can see is that financial fit a bit more challenging, but it doesn't mean we're stepping away from our commitment to driving acquisitions. And we've been asked, are you limiting yourself to the bolt-on types of acquisitions. And we will look at a pretty wide range of the size of the deals and maybe I'll toss it to Chris to talk about our capacity at this point.
K. Farkas
executiveYes. So I mean, we're pretty proud of our balance sheet. I think we've consider ourselves investment rated debt, and we've been getting pricing in that BBB+ type range. We took some steps this last year to get ahead of what's happening here in the interest rate environment. We upsized our revolver. We got $300 million in notes all at very attractive pricing. Today, we're probably around 2.1x debt to EBITDA. We've got about $1.7 billion of capacity. So we certainly have the flexibility to support going after something on the acquisition side of things. And that is our top priority. But we also believe as part of our capital allocation strategy that returning capital to shareholders is very important. And we believe that share buyback is the most effective way to do that. I think if you look at what we've done over the past 3 years, $600 million of share buyback over the last 3 years and we bought back that stock at about $119 on average. So it's been a pretty good program so far. So we talk often about this. We have been assertive. We believe that as the opportunity presents itself going forward, we will continue to be assertive. We haven't been as bullish, I would say, on the dividend, but we do believe that a modest approach to the dividend and dividend increases is the best way for us to approach that, and we'll continue to grow our dividend in alignment with our sales growth in the upcoming years as we've done for the past 3.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. And I know at the Investor Day, you targeted quantum $300 million, $400 million a year of deal size transactions. And it certainly hasn't matured that way, just the deals haven't gone that way. Is the pipeline as you qualify today better, worse, the same as the last couple of years?
Lynn Bamford
executiveI would say it's definitely better today and pretty recently than it has been really since bringing ESCO across the line. We obviously bought a small surface treatment business, I don't want to disregard it, but not very significant financially immediately. We'll grow it over time. But we looked at a lot of deals that were pretty quickly dismissed from a financial standpoint, a lot of, I would say, lower quality businesses that just operated at very different profitability and cash generation points that the journey would have been too hard to bring them into Curtiss-Wright. But I'd say over the past couple of months, I don't know if people were holding off, thinking maybe interest rates will go back down and now people are accepting this is going to be here for a while. And so if you have a property you want to sell, it's just time to sell it, but some much higher quality targets have come available. And we've got a couple of things that we're in early stages with that could be really strong additions to Curtiss-Wright. So it's really nice to see that have some properties that -- if things progress, we would absolutely bring them in and they would become a strong contributor within the company.
Myles Walton
analystIn that size range or even larger than the size range?
Lynn Bamford
executiveMostly in that size range, but I know a couple of things that are going to be coming to market either later this year or early '24, that would be larger.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. Got it. Maybe shifting to defense. Got the debt ceiling, which is sort of right in front of us as it relates to your expectations for budgetary outcomes, but more importantly, what you have in the backlog, what you're seeing in the order pipeline from prior budgets. What is the growth rate that you're thinking about for the next couple of years within your defense portfolio?
Lynn Bamford
executiveSo we're still very optimistic about our defense business and feel confident we will be able to grow it even if there is some tumultuousness that obviously, '23, I'm sure everyone is aware, it was a really significant 10% increase in the defense budget. And 13% of that was in the investment accounts, which is RDT&E and procurement, which is really where we drive the business that Curtiss-Wright delivers on. So in good growth across all 3 branches of the military. So very solid baseline for us to have and very well aligned with our technologies, the C5ISR capabilities continue to be spattered throughout the Air Force really all 3 branches, very strong support for naval ship buildings, 11 ships with continued support for Columbia and an additional DDG-51. So a very good strong base. Obviously, the President's put forward his FY '24 budget, a lower increase, but coming off of that big increase. I think general wisdom is it will probably increase a bit as it goes through markups. But even within the budget he put forward and again, in those investments accounts, there's roughly 5% increase in both naval and aerospace. So again, really strong business there. And within the Army, the areas where -- that are important to Curtiss-Wright still have very strong support and are in early days. So you mentioned our backlog. We do feel that the really strong order book we had last year, we're out to a great start this year. That backlog will give us some protection for sure. That doesn't carry on forever. But if we fall into a CR and it's at 2023 levels, that's a pretty healthy level of spending and spending in places where we want because it's not just spending cap, but you can't move money around and reprogram it. And so with good line of sight of where the '23 money is spent. So not to say it won't impact us. We talked in '22 that when the CR went on for 180 days, we did feel the effect, the R&D type portion of that, that where we do derive a reasonable amount of business got frozen. So no impact, but I think we're pretty well whether to grow the storm. And just to the other -- we're not all U.S.-based. We have a pretty good international footprint. The NATO has been slowly moving towards spending the incremental amounts they've been talking about that, where they will spend that money. We either come to the U.S. to buy existing systems where we have pretty broad coverage or to do build out capabilities in Europe and largely thinking as much of that will be ground vehicles, where we have a very strong presence in Europe on ground vehicles and international shipbuilding. So there's other pockets that we can really emphasize for growth that are not just tied to the U.S. DoD.
K. Farkas
executiveOkay. And just to put some numbers around that. I mean, 8% of our business today is what we would call foreign direct military spending. So we're selling directly to the foreign prime or directly to the foreign customer. That doesn't include the strong content that we have on many other programs like the F-35 or Black Hawk or Seahawks or C-130Js that are sold to the primes and then go international. So as we're looking at that and we see the spending increasing going forward, we see that as an opportunity. We don't think it's really started to take a stronghold yet, but maybe more towards the end of the year and into 2024, you'll start to see some of that uplift. For the announcements that have taken place to date, whether it's F-35, F-15, F-16, C-130Js all these Pumas, the various platforms were on all of these. And so we're really positioned well, I think, to benefit from that increase in international spending as well.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. And any questions, feel free to raise your hand, I'll try and call on you. There was a question that sort of came to me and someone asked me about was your pricing within the portfolio. And obviously, you're working on highly engineered parts across the portfolio, commercial defense. And what has been your success rate in terms of passing on price net of inflation? Is there a strategy? And is this a good environment or a bad environment for sort of pricing in your products?
Lynn Bamford
executiveMaybe I'll kick this one off and then let you, Chris, talk to some of the numbers specifically. So when I became CEO, one of the early initiatives I put into place really before we saw how dramatic the inflationary pressures was going to be was the commercial excellence program to really consider how we took contracts within Curtiss-Wright, build in escalation clauses, the length of long-term agreements we would sign up from that whole process. And it was fortuitous, lucky, call it what you will, but it really -- we got the ball rolling early on with really training ourselves as an organization to take the best practices that existed in the industry, but -- and within pockets of Curtiss-Wright, and implement those across the teams. And this has been an ongoing journey that continues to the day. We rolled up our sleeves. We've tackled long-term agreements that we had many, many years left in them that were not in favorable positions for Curtiss-Wright and work with our customer base to convince them that they needed to work with us as a supplier. We are committed to being a quality supplier that services our customers, but that sometimes they have to work with us. And so I'm really proud of the work the team has done across the board to really systematically go across our businesses and address those things. Maybe, Chris, will actually talk to some of the numbers.
K. Farkas
executiveSure. Yes. I think as we look at the margin expansion this year that we have for Curtiss-Wright, it's 10 to 30 basis points, and that includes roughly $7 million of incremental R&D investments. And then beyond that, we've got a lot of development contracts that are taking place. We recently had that press release regarding the subsea pump contract that we won, and that's going to be a temporary margin drain. But overall, our margins are up on the full year. I would say with the successes that we're having, the greatest successes we're seeing within the Aerospace and Industrial segment. And as you look maybe across the full portfolio, I would say 10 basis points of the 30 this year is going to come back through pricing and just being able to stay ahead of inflation.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. That's a good transition into the industrial business. So your sales growth in 1Q is actually above your full year outlook as the guidance run rate. Any reason -- and you mentioned it sort of on the call that you're watchful of any softening conditions, but is it you're seeing any? Or you're just mindful of the backdrop?
K. Farkas
executiveYes. Before I get into that, I just want to say that our total Curtiss-Wright sales guide for the year is 4% to 6%, of which 3% to 5% is organic. We have record backlog. We're having historical highs in orders. We had another great first quarter from an order perspective. So we have a lot of confidence right now as we go through the full year and our sales guidance and all of our guidance. I think as you look specifically at the industrial business, they have had a great Q1, to your point. They were up, I think, 9% or so in revenues, and that was evenly split between industrial vehicles and then also kind of the automation and services that we provide. When you peel back the onion a little bit on the order book, the orders were actually down in Q1, 20% year-over-year, but still above pre-pandemic healthy 2019 levels. And that business itself has a very, very strong backlog. The order book doubled in '21. So I think there's still some of that going on. I think what we're seeing right now is as the supply chain is improving in commercial industrial, lead times are shortening and customers are starting to adjust their order book. So we're expecting to see a little bit of that normalize here in the first half of the year and then pick up as we get into the second half of the year. But overall, our sales guidance within general industrial is 2% to 4%. That includes a 1% FX headwind. So it's 3% to 5% on the full year. We're certainly approaching the situation cautiously. And I think we have been -- I don't think I know, we have been in contact with our customers. Many of them are experiencing similar strong starts to the year. They're optimistic as to where we're going. I think, between the communication that we're receiving and then also some other things that we're doing to launch new products in the power electronic management space to caretake advantage of secular trends in vehicle electrification. We're optimistic that, that order book is going to pick up as we get deeper into the year and into 2024.
Myles Walton
analystIs it mostly on the -- which part of the portfolio are you seeing the most normalization of the order trends?
K. Farkas
executiveI'd say it's mostly within the industrial vehicles. I think as you take a look at some more of our shorter-cycle businesses, the surface tech business, which people call the canary in the coal mine, it's really more of an indication of what's happening now in production activity across general industrial or it can be a very good indicator as to whether there's a problem coming because it shuts down very, very fast. But that business itself has been running in the high single digits to low double digits for orders, and we're not seeing any signs of weakness there. So I think, again, it's just really just being more cautious as we approach this and letting some of that slack work its way out.
Myles Walton
analystOkay. Good. Nuclear. Just to shift gears on the commercial nuclear side of the house, maybe the aftermarket to start us off. I know during COVID, you had certain restrictions, service maintenance, upgrades weren't able to be filled as maybe as fast as they would otherwise have been. And I think you're working through some of that backlog. What's the outlook for this year and maybe going forward within the commercial aftermarket?
Lynn Bamford
executiveWe've seen really nice order patterns in our commercial aftermarket business. And I think some of it initially was a catch back up. But I think way more across the board, we're seeing this as just increased activity due to commitments to keep the current nuclear fleet here in the U.S., specifically online and go for that 60-day to year license transitions. '23 will be the first year that we're not facing the shutdown of a reactor during the year. So stable at the current 92 reactors. Of those 92, just over half, 47 to be specific, just over half, have committed and are either applied already or processing their applications for that 60- to 80-year license extension. And most of the other ones are expected too. They're just not old enough yet that they're at the juncture to do that. So that's really -- we've been asked many times, how much work we think those -- that license extension will drive. And it's very hard because it does very much vary plant by plant. And even when we're doing the maintenance work, the orders that we're seeing, it's not necessarily like, oh, this is aftermarket, and this is subsequent license renewal. But clearly, we're hearing from our customers, they're beginning to implement the things, maintenance work that they wouldn't have done if they weren't doing that, those extensions. And I think it's very early days, but we're beginning to feel the influence of the government dollars that have been made available through first, the Infrastructure Bill with some tax credits and then in The Inflation Reduction Act, some additional credits available out of the government. Those monies are really driving confidence in the utilities to spend the money and maintain these plants. And that is the predominance of our business is here in the U.S. But we're doing that in Canada and over in Europe. And we've never had much of a presence with a footprint in the aftermarket in France, and that has been a big focus for us starting last year, and we're making inroads in France that could be a significant growth vector. So that business has historically been low single-digit growth even in a difficult market. We're definitely seeing it go move into a mid-single-digit growth market for the foreseeable future.
Myles Walton
analystDo you have a sense as to penetration rates of what is addressable within the commercial aftermarket nuclear side of the house, what Curtiss-Wright currently does, what they could do in the future? Is that something that you think about?
Lynn Bamford
executiveWe -- one of our programs is -- one of our business units, I should say, continually looks to bring in new products that a lot of people went out of their nuclear business. It's small enough and it's not easy to be a nuclear supplier. You have to maintain a lot of quality standards, go through NUPIC, a whole variety of things. And so we actively engage the broader market that if they would like, we'll take over, sometimes paying the royalty, sometimes pay just to buy a product line and do it. So I mean, we're always looking to expand the footprint of what we have. I mean, we are a very significant supplier into this market. And I had the luxury of being invited to an NEI dinner last week and a variety of the manufacturers of the new next-generation advanced reactors were at the table along with a variety of government officials. And Curtiss-Wright was there as one of the few or only Tier 2 supplier in that network. And I think it really demonstrates where we sit in importance in that market.
Myles Walton
analystWell, that's a good transition. So what is the outlook for small modular reactors and advanced nuclear reactors over the next 5 years? Because obviously, that's a greenfield opportunity for Curtiss-Wright. Great position for it if it happens, it's awesome. If it doesn't, it's not in the numbers, but what was the outcome of the dinner?
Lynn Bamford
executiveWell, the outcome of the dinner was a very strong sense of commitment that the government needs to play a role today to help drive the commitment to an order base that will drive the supply chain and the manufacturers to get moving with being ready to scale for this. And obviously, ARDP money was put in place back in 2020. X Energy, who we're very proud of our content with them, is moving forward rapidly. TerraPower was the other receiver of the ARDP money. We're very much engaged with them. There's nothing to talk about publicly with content there yet. But we're engaged across all the SMR reactors. And I mean the potential for this, if they build out reactors at the rates they're talking, they very much are focused on bringing 13 gigawatts of power a year on board is what the DOE is trying to lay the groundwork with industry to deliver on. I mean that's just massive for Curtiss-Wright. But in the next 5 years, what you specifically asked about for all these small module reactors and we are working hard to be engaged with GE Hitachi and Holtec and Rolls-Royce, right -- NuScale right down the board. They've got a build test facilities, put equipment in the test facilities, build out their prototype reactors. That's significant business for Curtiss-Wright in getting through the next 5 years. And we're recognizing revenue as we do design and development work across some of these reactor developers today. It's not significant to the organization but we're going to be moving into prototyping and test facility development here in the next year or 2 years, and that's really going to be quite a catalyst for us. Probably something we'll be talking about at our next Investor Day.
Myles Walton
analystAll right. Good teaser. All right. Well with that, I appreciate your time. Thank you.
Lynn Bamford
executiveThank you.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Curtiss-Wright Corporation transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Curtiss-Wright Corporation earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.