CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. (CTMX) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
January 5, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood day, and welcome to the CytomX conference call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker, Mr. Chris Ogden, Senior Vice President, Finance. Please go ahead.
Chris Ogden
executiveThank you. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us. With me on the call today is Dr. Sean McCarthy, CytomX' Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that during this call, we will be making forward-looking statements. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties and risks that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Important risks and uncertainties are set forth in our most recent public filings with the SEC at sec.gov. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. Earlier today, we announced a strategic collaboration agreement with Moderna to research and develop mRNA-based conditionally activated therapeutics for oncology and nononcology indications. Additionally, we issued a press release providing an update on our therapeutic pipeline and a summary of our company priorities for 2023. We encourage everyone to read both of today's releases and the associated materials. A recording of this call can be found under the Investors and News section of our website. In our agenda for today, Sean will provide perspective on the Moderna alliance and cover pipeline and platform updates, including clinical progress with CX-2029, our expanding efforts in the field of T-cell engaging bispecifics and our key areas of focus for 2023. With that, let me turn the call over to Sean starting on Slide 4.
Sean McCarthy
executiveThanks, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us and for your interest in CytomX. In the quest for more effective cancer treatments, given the enormous medical need that remains in oncology, the research and development of biologic therapies for cancer has evolved to highly potent formats that include T-cell engaging bispecifics, antibody-drug conjugates and immunotherapies. These approaches offer powerful anticancer potency, but maximizing their potential will require that we find ways to more effectively direct antitumor activity towards cancer tissue and away from normal tissues. CytomX' vision is to transform lives with safer, more effective therapies. We aim to realize this vision for the benefit of patients by leveraging our Probody platform to create high-impact therapeutics that are localized to disease tissue, thereby reducing systemic toxicities and maximizing overall benefit. Our expertise in biologic masking and our understanding of the tumor microenvironment places us at the forefront of this field. Over the past decade, we have translated our leading science into broad clinical progress, having treated more than 500 patients to date, many of whom have benefited significantly. Our continuous advancement in the field of localized biologic therapies has positioned CytomX to potentially unlock some of the biggest challenges in cancer R&D and beyond. Turning to Slide 5. CytomX has pursued a consistent strategy focused on long-term company build around the Probody platform to maximize impact for patients. Our investments to date have resulted in a deep pipeline of therapeutic candidates with potential to deliver significant near and long-term value. As a core components of our business model, we have also leveraged strategic partnerships to extend the reach of our science, maximize our shots on goal and bring nondiluted capital into the company. As a result of disciplined execution of our strategy, CytomX remains very strong, funded into 2025 and highly focused on executing to key milestones over the coming months and years. I'd now like to share some recent highlights regarding our progress at the company, starting with our announcement today of our collaboration with Moderna. So moving to Slide 6. In this new collaboration, CytomX and Moderna will be bringing our platforms together to research and develop mRNA-based conditionally active biologics. Under the terms of the agreement with Moderna, CytomX will receive an upfront payment of $35 million, which includes $5 million of prefunded R&D expense. CytomX will also continue to receive R&D funding for the collaboration and is eligible for up to $1.2 billion in milestones as well as royalties on net sales. Additionally, Moderna has an option to participate in the future CytomX financing. Moderna is our sixth major partner, and we are thrilled to be entering this new collaboration to focus on new opportunities in oncology and also in new therapeutic areas. CytomX and Moderna share a vision of investing at the intersection of biology and technology to transform the lives of patients, and this perspective is central to our partnership. Moderna's global impact has shown the enormous power of mRNA, and we look forward to working closely with our newest collaborator to bring novel mRNA-based localized therapeutics to patients with unmet medical needs. Turning now to Slide 7. Our broad pipeline of Probody therapeutics spans preclinical to Phase II and includes a range of modalities, including T-cell bispecifics, immunotherapies, antibody drug conjugates and now mRNA. Across our internal pipeline and partnered projects, we now have more than 15 active programs at CytomX, including 2 new INDs for wholly owned programs coming later this year. We'll provide a full update at JPMorgan next Wednesday. Today, I'll cover select highlights from our pipeline. And I'd like to start with our most advanced antibody drug conjugate CX-2029. Slide 9 provides an overview of CX-2029, a first-in-class conditionally activated antibody drug conjugate that targets CD71, the transferrin receptor. CD71 has been seen for decades as a target with great potential, but it presents unique challenges for the development of anticancer therapeutics because of its widespread expression in healthy tissues and its central role in iron metabolism. However, we've proven at CytomX through our previous Phase I work and now in the Phase II results we're sharing today the CD71 does indeed have the potential to be an effective drug target. We are the first to have reached therapeutically active levels of a CD71-targeted ADC in patients as well as to have demonstrated clinical activity in areas of high unmet need. CD71 is a high bar target by design and we continue to learn from this work how to maximize the potential of CX-2029 and our overall Probody platform. Before going through the latest data, let me remind you of the study design, which is outlined on Slide 10. There were 3 parts to the Phase I/II study. Part A was a 3 plus 3 dose escalation that range from 0.1 mg per kg to 5 mg per kg administered every 3 weeks. This work has been published previously in clinical cancer research. Beginning at 2 mg per kg, additional patients could be enrolled into Part B, a biopsy cohort. Part C encompassed the Phase II expansion cohorts dosed at 3 mg per kg every 3 weeks. The Phase II expansion cohorts included squamous non-small cell lung cancer, squamous head and neck cancer and esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Esophageal cancer cohorts included both squamous and adenocarcinoma histologies. Enrollment is now complete across the expansion cohorts and this data provides the basis for our update today. Slide 11 highlights the study population, which was heavily pretreated across all cohorts. With the median of 3 prior lines of therapy, including a majority having previously experienced both platinum-based therapy and a checkpoint inhibitor. Patients were not selected for CD71 expression. Slide 12 summarizes efficacy data. Taken together, looking now at the data across the completed expansion phase, encouraging clinical activity was observed in tumors of squamous histology, with objective response rates ranging from 7% to 21% and disease control rates ranging from 53% to 67%. We have previously reported clinical signals for CX-2029 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and squamous non-small cell lung cancer. And we've recently been very interested to see another squamous tumor signal emerge in esophageal cancer. Slide 13 focuses on new data for squamous esophageal cancer where the objective response rate was 21% and the disease control rate was 57%. 3 out of 14 efficacy evaluable patients had confirmed partial responses and 5 patients had a best response of stable disease. As of the reported data snapshot, 5 patients remained on study, including the 3 partial responses and 2 patients with stable disease. Slide 14 provides the spider plot across all tumor cohorts in the expansion phase, and I want to again emphasize here that these are unselected and heavily pretreated patient populations. Now there are several things to note here. Firstly, responses to CX-2029 can be durable. Secondly, all responses observed to date with CX-2029 have been seen in tumors of squamous histology. No responses were observed in esophageal adenocarcinoma as shown here in the upper right spider plot. We continue to explore this exciting clinical activity, and we note that it's known in the scientific literature that CD71 amplification is high in certain squamous tumors. Moreover, CD71 has been implicated as a poor prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer. We continue to interrogate this data to develop potential patient selection strategies in collaboration with our partner, AbbVie. Slide 15 provides an overview of the safety data in the study population, which is generally consistent with our previously reported clinical results for CX-2029. Anemia was the most common treatment-related adverse event with 76% of patients experiencing grade 3. Referring back now to the spider plots across the expansion cohorts. It's notable that patients who responded tended to do so fairly quickly, which is not unusual for an ADC. And investigators were generally able to maintain these responses and keep patients on drug through a combination of strategies, including dose reductions, dose delays and transfusions. Slide 16 summarizes our current takeaways with CX-2029. First, we have successfully utilized the Probody platform to open a therapeutic window for an ADC targeting CD71 for the first time. Meaningful clinical efficacy has emerged in heavily pretreated patients with tumors of 3 distinct squamous cancer types, including a newly observed signal in squamous esophageal tumors. Biomarker evaluation for patient selection strategies is ongoing, and we also continue to evaluate anemia mitigation strategies as we learn more about how to best utilize this drug candidate. On behalf of all my colleagues at CytomX and our collaborator AbbVie, I'd like to say that we're extremely proud to have brought CX-2029 to this point, and we're tremendously grateful to our investigators and to the patients, who have participated in this study. We look forward to working with AbbVie throughout 2023 to determine the next steps for this program. Next, I'd like to transition to our expanding activities in the field of T-cell engaging bispecific therapeutics, starting with a brief update on CX-904, our bispecific EGFR-CD3 Probody, which is currently in Phase I and partnered with Amgen in a global co-development alliance. The localization of potent activity of T cell engagers into solid tumors continues to be a major opportunity in cancer R&D, and the Probody platform may be ideally suited to unlocking this modality. Slide 18 outlines the rationale for CX-904. EGFR is a highly validated and broadly expressed cancer target, and we see a compelling opportunity to leverage the target to localize antitumor T cell responses preferentially to the tumor microenvironment. Our published preclinical data show that a localized bispecific EGFR-CD3 Probody can increase therapeutic window for this potent target combination. These preclinical data led to the advancement of CX-904, and we are now well underway with Phase I. The overall goal of the Phase I dose escalation portion of the study is to assess safety and to select a go-forward dose or doses for subsequent expansions in EGFR positive tumor types. Turning to Slide 19. I'm very pleased to share today that we are making excellent progress with CX-904 in the clinic. We successfully treated our first patient in May 2022 and have now advanced through the initial single patient cohorts, and we are actively enrolling patients into the 3 plus 3 phase of the study. We expect to make progress throughout 2023 with CX-904 dose escalation. Staying with T cell engagers on Slide 20, we continue to make progress in our multi-target program with Astellas, in which CytomX retains U.S. co-development and co-commercialization rights on a select number of programs and we look forward to providing additional updates. Finally, regarding T cell bispecifics, I'd like to provide some perspective on our newest effort in this space through our collaboration with Regeneron outlined on Slide 21. Under the terms of the agreement with Regeneron, CytomX received an upfront payment of $30 million and is eligible to receive up to approximately $2 billion in milestones as well as royalties on net sales. Research under the collaboration is funded by Regeneron. Now of course, Regeneron is a world-class R&D organization with a track record of consistently inventing, developing and commercializing new medicines. Regeneron has considerable efforts in T-cell bispecifics, and both companies see opportunities to broaden the reach of T cell engagers by utilizing CytomX platform to localize these highly potent agents to tumor tissue widening therapeutic window. This shared vision formed the basis of our discussions last year, leading to the deal we announced in November. Given Regeneron's acknowledged high bar for external innovation, this collaboration is yet another point of validation for CytomX scientific and platform expertise. We're currently launching this important new collaboration and we look forward to delivering paradigm-changing medicines for patients. Before closing the call, I'd like to briefly cover on Slide 23, the potential events and milestones at CytomX for 2023 across both our partnered and our wholly owned pipeline. For CX-904, we are focused on execution towards dose optimization for potential future expansions. For our wholly owned pipeline, we expect to file INDs for 2 next-generation molecules. CX-2051, our EpCAM targeting ADC and CX-801, our first localized cytokine targeting interferon alpha-2b. Additionally, in 2023, we expect progress in our most mature collaborations, including determining next steps for CX-2029 in conjunction with AbbVie and additional progress with BMS for the ongoing CTLA-4 programs. Lastly, we are really excited to be kicking off work with our newest partners, Regeneron and Moderna and to also continue to make progress across all of our collaborative programs. To sum up, CytomX enters 2023 with tremendous momentum. We continue to lead the field of conditional activation and we and our partners see the localization of potent biologics as a strategic area of R&D and oncology and increasingly, outside of oncology. In addition to our robust pipeline and strong partnerships, we start 2023 in an excellent financial position to continue to weather market uncertainties, and we look forward to a highly productive year ahead. At CytomX, we have pursued our vision relentlessly for more than 10 years, and we have invested heavily in bold clients to build the unique depth and breadth of our platform and pipeline. And we remain steadfast in our commitment to build CytomX into a highly successful long-term company. With that, operator, let's open the call up for some Q&A.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of Mitchell Kapoor with H.C. Wainwright.
Dipesh Patel
analystSean, this is Dipesh Patel on behalf of Mitchell Kapoor. A few questions here. The first one is, can you point to any reasons the Phase II data from CX-2029 in squamous non-small cell lung cancer was delayed from the fourth quarter of '22? When do you expect to have this data? And do you expect any delays in other pipeline programs due to these same factors?
Sean McCarthy
executiveSo the update -- thank you for the question. The update today is, of course, across all of the cohorts in the expansion study, the lung cohort, the head and neck and also the new data on esophageal, which we haven't reported at all previously. So as I remarked in my comments and detailed in the slides and in the press release, there are indeed full updates across the fully enrolled cohorts for each tumor type.
Dipesh Patel
analystOkay. Great. Second question, how do you view yourselves compared to competition that may be using conditionally activated molecules in the space, such as Werewolf Therapeutics? Who are the key competitors as of today? And what are the key attributes that you are watching the closest?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. That's a great question. We're really pleased to see other -- we have been pleased over the years to see other entrants into this field. As you know, we already pioneered this field and we continue to lead the field at CytomX. And it's great to see others following that lead. We continue to believe that we are a very long way ahead in terms of the depth of the science, the breadth of the pipeline, the extent of our clinical experience. And I think that's very much evidenced by these new collaborations with Regeneron. And today, we've announced with Moderna. We now have 6 major partnerships, and it's our leadership in the science and in the clinical realm that has attracted these partners. So we plan to maintain this lead.
Dipesh Patel
analystOkay. And any kind of comments on any competitors that you're watching today and who are the ones that you're watching the most closely?
Sean McCarthy
executiveI think we're watching the whole field with very close interest and that's a pretty significant number of companies. I wouldn't want to single out any particular company at this stage.
Dipesh Patel
analystGreat. And then my last question given the research collaboration announcement with Moderna today, when might we expect to hear additional details on the planned programs and when could these programs begin?
Sean McCarthy
executiveWell, we'll be kicking this collaboration off very, very shortly. There are no details provided today regarding the nature of the targets or the programs we'll probably be holding that type for some period to come. It will -- the collaboration will begin life as some initial research that we'll need to do on these programs. So we'll guide in the fullness of time.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Etzer Darout with BMO Capital Markets.
Etzer Darout
analystJust one, just if you could maybe frame the opportunity a bit more for squamous esophageal similar to what you did in the past with squamous non small cell lung, just a sense of sort of the opportunity there and potential benchmarks that you would look out for sort of this medium 3 prior lines obviously refractory population, just to give a sense of what we could sort of view will go forward -- path forward, if you will, for the program, given the response we saw today?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Thanks, Etzer, for the question. So it's a very interesting -- actually super exciting new signal that we've got in esophageal. As I'm sure you know, there's a pretty aggressive disease and where we are in the late-line setting. And so I think it's fair to say that by the time patients get to the third line, there are very, very few options for patients with a very rapidly progressing disease. And we've seen some very interesting confirmed responses. First-line, second-line therapy is quite variable, actually, but it tends to be chemo and then chemo plus a checkpoint inhibitor. The population, there is a pretty strong skewing of the squamous esophageal patient population to Asian countries. It's not -- I mean there is a significant number in the U.S., but it's really quite prevalent condition in many Asian countries. And indeed, we did some of our clinical work there. And in talking to investigators about the speed of some of the responses we've seen and the benefit that we've had for patients has really encouraged us. It's really too early to talk about any benchmarks. We're obviously in close collaboration and discussion with our partner, AbbVie. But -- so I don't really have anything to say there today. It's still a little too early in the program to comment. But we're very excited about this activity in this late line setting.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Mara Goldstein with Mizuho. .
Unknown Analyst
analystThis is [indiscernible] for Mara. One question on 2029. You indicated that you were in discussion with AbbVie. I'm just curious what could that next step in tell? And when -- like what sort of time line are we thinking about to hear about the next step for that program?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Thanks for the question. So the way that the collaboration with AbbVie is structured CytomX had responsibility for running the expansion phase of the Phase I/II study. And that's the data that we've updated today. And that expansion phase is now largely complete. After the expansion phase wraps up, the program per contract goes back to AbbVie to run the next studies. So we'll be having, obviously, close dialogue with AbbVie in the coming months regarding what those potential next studies could be. And I can't really comment any more than that at this point in time.
Unknown Analyst
analystGot it. And then just one more question on 2029. So you mentioned that one possibility of potentially enhancing the -- the 2029 is true biomarker selection. I just curious if you have a look at patients, who may have responded or stay in disease control, whether there are certain biomarkers that correlate to the efficacy of 2029? And if that's the possibility of exploring that with AbbVie further?
Sean McCarthy
executiveIt's a key focus of our work with AbbVie at the moment, and we're exploring a number of different directions for potential patient selection strategies. Of course, the obvious one being CD71 expression itself. I think as we commented previously, and in fact, in the clinical cancer research publication that we put out about 1 year ago. I don't think we can say that a target -- from the Phase I work at least that a target response relationship has jumped out at us from the data. And it could be that there are some unique characteristics about CD71 as a target because one of the reasons we've always liked CD71 so much is that it's such a rapid internalizer. We just don't know how much target is necessary to give a response. And it may turn out to be that the biology is a bit more complex than a direct response to target level correlation. So we need to do more work, and we are doing that work with AbbVie. But it's not lost on any of us, of course, that anything that we could do to select patients and decrease the denominator here would be advantageous as the program moves forward into potential later-stage studies.
Unknown Analyst
analystGot it. And then if I may, just to squeeze one more in on the Moderna collaboration. I know you're keeping tight lip, but could you just maybe give a little bit of color on what could like in terms of the characteristic of the product, because when we think of -- on the CytomX Probody technology, we typically think about proteins, engineering type of product, what could mRNA-based conditionally activated therapy looks like?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Thanks for asking the question. I'm very excited to answer it. So -- this is a very interesting convergence of the platforms of the 2 companies. And here's why. So Moderna has published some very interesting work showing that intravenous administration of mRNAs that encode therapeutic antibodies can actually lead to therapeutically relevant levels of antibodies in patients. And as you know, and I really don't want to speak too much for Moderna, not appropriate for you to do so, but you will, of course, be aware that Moderna is very, very actively and very aggressively moving into therapeutics with their mRNA platform. So that work is really very important because it shows that -- it opens up mRNA-encoded biologics to their platform. And with -- and of course, CytomX has one of the most, we believe, one of the most sophisticated biologics platforms out there in terms of our ability to localize biologic therapy into tumor tissue, and we believe into other disease tissues as well. So the program, the collaboration will be focused on, mRNA-encoded biologics, and that's really all we can say at this point. But it is just super exciting to be working together with Moderna, and we can't wait to kick this collaboration off.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Roger Song with Jefferies.
Jiale Song
analystA couple from us. The first one is also about the 2029. So I think in the past, you were guiding the squamous non small cell lung cancer, probably 20% is the bar for the ORR and the esophageal and GEJ is a little bit kind of more complex. But in terms of the next step you are discussing with AbbVie -- so you also talked about the biomarker and anemia mitigation strategy. So will that be part of the discussion to further improve the efficacy profile, you will move forward or that kind of effect profile may be sufficient to -- for the next step kind of for the -- maybe less heavily to pretreated patient population?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Roger, thanks for the questions. So I think you touched on a number of different components to the program and to the ongoing thinking that we're doing with AbbVie regarding 2029. And as is usually the case, of course, as one gets more experience with a very unique drug candidate like this. One has more data to work with in terms of thinking about what the levers are in terms of optimizing the way that we could use the drug in the future. And so -- yes, absolutely, biomarker strategies, target selection of these types of strategies, we're going to be looking at very aggressively. Anemia mitigation, it's been quite interesting actually in the -- as we've continued the expansion phase, and I mentioned in my prepared remarks, our observations really over the last year as we've been continuing to gain experience with 2029 are that if patients respond, they're going to respond pretty quickly. And the anemia does come on pretty rapidly as well. But with more experience utilizing the drug, of course, positions are much more on the lookout for it and ready if patients are responding to think about leveraging mitigation strategies such as dose reductions, dose delays, and transfusions. I can tell you that about 80% of patients do get transfused. And so that is a strategy that can keep patients on drug. And we continue to learn with our investigators, how to manage patients when they are responding. So there's plenty to work with here, we think. In terms of what -- how response rate relates to specific next steps devil's in the detail there, and there's nothing more we can say, as I've already commented, we have to talk to AbbVie more. But I would say that we're pretty interested in this esophageal signal because there's very few options for these patients in the late line.
Jiale Song
analystGot it. Okay. Great. All right. So maybe just a quick one related to the cash runway since you're not changing the guidance for the cash runway into 2025. One is, does that include upfront from the Regeneron and the Moderna? Secondly, what -- yes, to the extent you can comment how much near-term milestone payments, you will kind of expect can potentially further extend the cash runway?
Chris Ogden
executiveRoger, this is Chris. So yes, on the financial guidance with cash runway, we continue to maintain our guidance into 2025. I mean, really, this is just -- we feel a sufficient guidance at this point in time given it's out a couple of years. Certainly, these agreements for Regeneron and Moderna continue to strengthen the balance sheet. And I think more broadly, kind of getting to your second question, just highlight the breadth of science across the company and the ability to bring nondilutive capital into the company, which we think uniquely positions us relative to peers. In terms of milestones near term, we don't comment on the specifics, but certainly, we expect to make good progress. These are organizations that can work with speed, as can we so look forward to making progress over the coming years.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Anupam Rama with JPMorgan. .
Anupam Rama
analystHappy New Year and look forward to seeing you guys next week. Sean, kind of commented on this in the last question, but maybe you could put it into context, the 2029 anemia signal that you're seeing. I think you said that it comes on early, how early -- how persistent is it once you do dose delays and dose reductions or even in transfusion, does it come back when you go back on therapy or full dose therapy? Like how do we think about that dynamic in the context of what we're seeing here?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes, thanks. And yes, it's an important question, right? So something that we continue to learn about. And as the year goes on, I think this is something that we'll probably want to provide more details on as we do more analysis on this expansion phase now that it's fully enrolled. But -- the anemia is, as we've described previously, it's predictable. We believe it to be manageable and is reversible. There's no other real safety signal that's jumped out from the drug. And in terms of the etiology of the anemia sort of where it's coming from, again, we've commented previously that it does look like a pretty early effect in erythropoiesis. So where we seem to be impacting early progenitors and we think that the -- there's a very couple of things going on. There seems to be a payload related aspect to this. The MMAE payload, which we know from other drugs has a certain level of anemia incidence. And there's probably some low level of target engagement because as I've said previously, going way back actually to when we first presented the Phase I data, the Probody is, of course, masked, but it's not 0 affinity. So we know that if you don't mask, you can't get anywhere close to therapeutic levels of the drug. If you do mask, you can get to therapeutic levels and we have clinical activity. But it wouldn't be surprising to us if there was some low level target engagement. And that, that combined with the payload contribution is not unlikely what's driving the anemia. We'll understand more about that mechanistically as time goes on because the more we understand mechanistically the better able we should be able to deal with this and potentially mitigate. In terms of the natural history of the anemia, it does come on relatively quickly by the time patients get to their first scan. We usually kind of know where patients are. And that's like I said earlier on, it gives physicians an opportunity to assess patients and if they are responding to implement mitigation measures. And in fact, they may even have already been implementing transfusions. So dose reductions, dose delays, maintaining patients in response. And it's -- we don't yet know -- in terms of how we need to do more work analyzing how patients bounce back over time. I can't really answer that question today because we don't have the data, that's analysis that we still need to do. But I do think over time, we're getting a better handle on this. And there may even be other ways that we haven't utilized yet to think about mitigating the anemia in the future. And as I said, this is a highly innovative, still really pretty early stage drug candidate and we've got some way to go and some time to figure this out.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. And that will come from the line of Peter Lawson with Barclays.
Peter Lawson
analystSean, just on esophageal patients, the responders. Is there any details you can provide around these patients kind of what therapies they've seen before and/or the kind of the expression levels of PD-1 and HER2?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Peter, thanks for the question. So as we mentioned in the press release and on the call, the majority of patients across the expansion stage had received prior checkpoint inhibition. And that is true of the responders in esophageal. They had all previously had a checkpoint inhibitor. So that's noteworthy, we think. Again, heavily pretreated patients. And we'll share more details as time goes on as we write some of this data up in terms of the patient -- the full patient characteristics, but we are seeing activity in the post checkpoint inhibitor setting in squamous esophageal.
Peter Lawson
analystGot you. And do you intend to either publish this? Or are you thinking about presenting at a medical meeting?
Sean McCarthy
executiveNo decisions made on that yet, something that we'll talk to our partner about we had committed to giving an update on this program around this time and we wanted to get this out there so that everyone can see the progress that we're making and further opportunities for a presentation of publication, we'll be discussing and deciding with AbbVie.
Peter Lawson
analystWhat kind of response rate would you have expected in this kind of third line plus set of population for esophageal?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Like I said earlier, I'd rather not get into expectations at this point. When you're running a study like this and you're going into a patient population for the first time with such a novel drug candidate and up by definition, in very late-stage patients, who are progressing very fast. You're happy to see any responses, right? The drug is active that's what we're trying to figure out. And we have the signal a lot more work to do now to really pin it down and see where it goes next. Very excited for the patients.
Peter Lawson
analystAnd what's the initial feedback been from physicians around the data either those on -- particularly those on the study?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes, I would say that it's really encapsulated in comments I've already made in terms of the -- these patients are in pretty bad shape, the squamous esophageal patients by the time they get on to this type of study. And I would say that our investigators have been pretty excited about what they've seen.
Peter Lawson
analystGot you. And then on the Moderna collaboration. So we should be -- this is clearly an RNA encoding biological versus a delivery process for the mRNA. And so would that be including kind of full probodies or fragments of probodies, just anything you can say around the finer details around the mechanism of action would be great?
Sean McCarthy
executiveNothing really more I can say at this point regarding the details of what we'll be doing other than what we've already commented on, which is that this convergence of the 2 platforms to make mRNA-encoded biologics is just is really a new frontier, and we're just super excited to be in this alliance with Moderna.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. That will come from the line of Joe Catanzaro with Piper Sandler.
Joseph Catanzaro
analystMaybe just 2 quick ones for me. First one on the Moderna collaboration. I think interesting that it includes non-oncology indications. So wondering if you could just speak at a high level where there's opportunity in these non-oncology indications that you could still leverage differential protease expression? And then second, on the CD71 biomarker discussion, I appreciate your comments on maybe the challenges around CD71 as a protein-based biomarker. But Sean, I think it sounded like you said there's evidence of CD71 amplification. So wondering if there's opportunity for maybe a genomic-based biomarker?
Sean McCarthy
executiveGreat questions. Yes, we're really excited about this non-oncology element to the collaboration with Moderna. We've had -- I mean, while going back more than 10 years, we've had interest in non-oncology. We actually did some work some years ago, exploring the protease microenvironment of a number of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. And there are clearly, proteases and protease signatures in those kinds of conditions that we think could be leveraged in a similar way to how we leverage protease signatures in cancer. If you look at the scientific literature, you'll see protease dysregulation associated with actually many different disease conditions, not just inflammatory autoimmune, but cardiovascular, fibrotic conditions. Many different areas that could be open to us now and in the future. And with Moderna's platform being so incredibly broad and versatile is a very natural fit for us and a huge opportunity for us at CytomX to now be able to move into the non-oncology realm. We're not disclosing at this stage anything specific about where we're going. But I would just again sort of restate that there are many places that we can go in the modern collaboration potentially other collaborations and internally in the future. Regarding CD71, yes, you make a really good point that -- and I did -- thanks for picking up on the amplification comment. I think you're right. I think that it certainly has the potential to translate into some kind of a genomic biomarker. We just need to do more work to figure that out.
Operator
operatorOne moment for our next question. That will come from the line of Boris Peaker with Cowen.
Unknown Analyst
analystThis is Nick on for Boris. I just have a quick one. For BMS-986249, I was just taking a look at clinicaltrials.gov at the study. And it shows completion -- the primary completion of September 2024. So I just wanted to see if you can give any more info on that study design? It looks like an interesting study of head-to-head against ipi. So I want to see what else you guys could provide any clarity that you can have?
Sean McCarthy
executiveYes. Thanks for the question, Nick. So there's a lot going on with BMS in the collaboration that we've updated on over the last few months with the 2 anti-CTLA-4 probodies that they're advancing in the clinic. So 986249 is the ipi Probody. That is currently in a randomized Phase II study where Probody ipi/nivo is being compared to ipi/nivo in frontline metastatic melanoma. BMS has continued to make progress in rolling in that study. They presented last year at ESMO updated Phase I data for the ipi Probody, a pretty comprehensive update there, showing interesting clinical activity for the Probody in melanoma, but also interestingly as well in MSS CRC, which we thought was kind of intriguing. So they continue to run that study. And there's no guidance yet on when that data will be available for release, but we're very pleased that they continue to invest in getting that data. The second Probody is a nonfucosylated version of ipi. This is called BMS-986288. Now they reported Phase I results at SITC last year for what's called 218, which is the non-Probody version, the non-fucosylated ipi. Again, interesting results showing a level of clinical activity also fairly significant toxicity at the higher doses, which opens the door for the Probody, the 288. And they haven't released any clinical data yet for that, the non-fucosylated Probody, but they are continuing to invest in that study as well. So I think it's important to note that when BMS talks about their CTLA-4 next-gen programs, there are 3 of them, 2 of them are probodies, right, 249 and 288 and sandwiched in between the 2 is 218, the antibody, the non-fucosylated antibody. So -- we're interested to see how this unfolds as this year progresses. And like I said, we're very pleased with how the collaboration is going and how much BMS continues to invest in the studies.
Operator
operatorAnd today's final question will be a follow-up from the line of Mara Goldstein with Mizuho. Okay. I'm showing no further questions in the queue at this time. Thank you all for participating. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.
Sean McCarthy
executiveThank you very much.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.