Dana Incorporated (DAN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 10, 2022

New York Stock Exchange US Consumer Discretionary Automobile Components conference_presentation 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#1

Okay. It looks like we're getting going with the next webcast. So once again, I'm Ryan Brinkman. Thanks for coming to the 2022 JPMorgan Automotive Conference. Very excited to get going with the next presentation, which is Dana, and we have the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Tim Kraus. Tim, thanks so much for coming. We really appreciate it.

Timothy Kraus

executive
#2

Nope, happy to be here, Ryan. All right. Ready?

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#3

Yes, please.

Timothy Kraus

executive
#4

All right. Let's do it. All right. So just a little bit of background for everybody. So Dana, old-line company, really, I think, paving the future in vehicles, founded in 1904, about 40,000 employees, 140 major facilities in 31 countries. So very diversified both in terms of customers and locations. Last year, we did about $9 billion in revenue. So a little overview of the business. We operate in 3 distinct end markets. So light vehicle, heavy vehicle and off-highway. Off-highway comprises construction, mining, agricultural, forestry segments. Light Vehicle Driveline systems, Off-Highway Drive and Motion. So that includes not only components that drive the vehicles, but components that actually actuate and move the work circuits on those vehicles. Commercial Vehicle Drive and Motion and then our Power Technologies group. We sell pretty distinct technologies. So historically, it's been drive technologies. Those are axles, e-Axles, drive shafts and differentials. On the motion side, think of winches, slew drives, gearboxes and hydraulic components. Electrodynamics, so as the industry and the end markets transition into an electrified future, we have a full suite of electrodynamic components. So that includes traction motors, inverters, power electronics. Our thermal business, which historically, from an ICE perspective, was oil coolers and transmission coolers, now it includes that as well as battery, motor and electronics cooling capabilities. On the sealing side, again, historically, think of gaskets. Going forward, it includes battery and inverter housing gaskets, cam covers as well as various transmission components. And then lastly, digital, so where we used to make very mechanical-oriented products, all of the new products are software-enabled, driving a lot of digital impacts for the business. So that diverse end markets and segments really does translate into a very large market reach and application. You can see from some of the pictures here. Everything from the Jeep Wrangler, which we produced since World War II, with the drive systems for World War II, to a Zamboni to a reach stacker or electrified lawn care equipment. So I think it's not just our market reach that really makes us unique, but Dana is the only supplier with the ability to produce a 4-in-1 system for e-Propulsion. So this includes e-motors, mechanicals. So think of gearboxes, gears, converters, power electronics. So high-voltage and low-voltage inverter as well as software and controls. And then the fourth is thermal management. So we have a complete suite of battery cooling, battery electronics -- or electronics cooling as well as motor cooling. This really does provide the only in-house e-Propulsion systems' capability in the supply base and really does give us a unique bottoms-up approach to designing the most efficient e-Propulsion systems for the industries. And this really comes across today, you can see here, battery management across all types of vehicles. So the silhouettes of bus, Class 8 truck, car, but also in controls, battery management, thermal management and our traditional axles. So what does this translate it into? For us, we announced this in April, but it really shows -- we've announced our first light-vehicle electrification win. It's with a major global OEM. I can't say who it is yet, but it is a Dana vertically integrated, complete e-Propulsion system. And it represents about a 3x the content of a traditional driveline system that we would produce for this OEM. And it really does show that the work that the company has done over the past 5 years to transition and be ready for electrification and the capabilities we have really are delivering results with our customers. So what we do have, though, is still a very, very broad and robust internal combustion engine business. So up here is our key program launches. This year, we're launching 22 programs across 16 facilities. Our $800 million in backlog for the next 3 years has quite a bit of ICE. And these programs are going to generate the capital needed to continue to push and fund our development into the EV world. But you can see some of the biggest light-vehicle truck platforms with major OEMs. So the Ranger both globally. So we produce that product in Thailand, South Africa, Argentina and here in the U.S. Ford Super Duty and Range Rover and Range Rover Sport for JLR in Europe. So talk a little bit about the current markets. So commodity costs continue to be a significant headwind for the company. Certainly, through the first half of the year, we saw dramatic increases in steel and other inputs into the products. We're starting to see a little bit of the commodity costs starting to recover. We think that will happen late in the year. And you can see here the prior forecast for scrap steel, and then the green bar being where we're kind of seeing it. So it's down about 30%, again, seeing that in the back half of the year. Unfortunately, we're not seeing the same positive trend for other cost inflation, which for us is principally it's energy, labor, transportation fuel, really all the other inputs that go into the product. Those continue to rise at a fairly rapid rate. Those -- the net inflation cost impacts about 20% higher currently than we thought just 3 months ago. And we're working, obviously, with our customers to recover those costs, and those talks continue, and we're making progress. We're also able to get improved commercial terms, aiding working capital as we sort of work through this with our customers. And again, the strong U.S. dollar is translating into a headwind for both sales and profitability for the company. On the market demand side, overall, end-market demand remains extremely robust across all of them. So off-highway, commercial vehicle and our light vehicle. Unfortunately, the OEM supply constraints supply chain issues continue to create significant volatility in the build patterns in most of our customers, which does create quite a bit of headwinds for us in terms of our ability to convert. And then, of course, we did experience the impacts of China shutdown earlier this year. We anticipate that to hopefully not repeat, but to have only a small impact on the business. So what does this all mean? So what it means is our 2022 guidance of about $10.1 billion in sales. Of that, we're now showing about $600 million in electric-vehicle product sales. That's up $230 million from 2021. Adjusted EBITDA of $720 million, and a free cash flow of $200 million, that's a $410 million increase over 2021. And then we ended the second quarter with liquidity of about $1.3 billion. So the company is well positioned to weather where we're at in the current market environment and have the ability to continue to deliver for our customers as we go forward. With that, I'll just leave you to this, changing our world through e-Propulsion. Obviously, as we go through, we deal with climate change, we are lockstep with our customers in really providing the products that they need to deliver an electrified future and a future that is more ecologically sound for all of us. So with that, I'll give you.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#5

Great, Tim. I'll start up with some questions, including -- I wanted to get your thoughts on normalized demand for light vehicles in the United States. Of course, we ran at 17 million for so many years prior to the pandemic. We're only at 13.7 million now, with the most -- often suggested reason as to why because all of the supply constraints. And yes, also the vehicles cost so much more, too. Maybe the vehicles cost so much more in part because of the supply constraints. But nevertheless, they also cost more because of inflation and whatnot. So just curious, given this, if you think that we're likely to return to pre-pandemic levels of industry volumes and over what time frame, or if it's not the case, if we are in some sort of protracted period of higher price and lower volume, how the supplier industry and Dana, in particular, may be positioned for that?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#6

No, it's a good question. I think -- will we ever get back to 17 million? I don't know. I don't have a crystal ball. I do think that the industry where it's operating today is underserved in terms of market demand being -- at least in light vehicle certainly under -- there's not enough production being provided into the market. So I do think that production will ultimately rise once the supply chain and other issues work their way out. Inflation obviously is concern. The affordability of vehicles, obviously, is a -- or could become a concern. I think we'll just have to sort of sort through it, but I do believe that there is quite a bit of pent-up demand on the light-vehicle side. We primarily serve the light truck space. And certainly, if you think about our largest program, which is the Super Duty, that's really geared to work-related applications. So think of your trades, right? So construction workers, plumbers, those sorts of things. Those individuals need the vehicles to actually perform their work. And as that fleet ages, it needs to be replaced. So I don't think that inflation will be as impactful in some of the markets that we do serve.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#7

Okay. I wanted to get your latest thoughts, too, on the pace and progress of customer discussions to recover a lot of the premium costs that you've incurred over the past year, including for diesel, freight, logistics, electricity, natural gas, et cetera...

Timothy Kraus

executive
#8

Anything else you want to add there...

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#9

Labor. I mean, historically, that wasn't the responsibility of the automakers to compensate. That was your own problem. But historically, ocean shipping wasn't up 350%, right? It was up 10% or something. So maybe talk about your kind of ability to reopen contracts and get better pricing on existing programs. But then also, as you negotiate new contracts going forward, just like how you index the price of steel, does it make sense to index the price of natural gas and electricity, I can't imagine labor. But any sort of increased protection or flexibility that you might gain going forward like you did after [ '03 through '07?]

Timothy Kraus

executive
#10

No, it's an interesting question. So I think to your first question, we're in talking with all of our customers across all the end markets. So principally talking about light vehicle here. But obviously, we serve the commercial vehicle OEMs as well as a very, very diverse off-highway set of customers. They're all a little bit different. We're in talking to all of them and continue to work the process. I think -- so those are progressing. I think we're continuing to address it, and the customers are -- I wouldn't say they're happy about it, but they understand that they need a supply base, which is strong, especially as they start to transition from ICE to EV. So I think we'll see where we end up. But obviously, it's not where we want it to be, but we're continuing to work it. Your point on contracts, I think the OEMs are reluctant to change the basic structure of the contracts like they did for commodities, in large part because they still believe it's -- this is temporal and that it's going to revert back to a more normalized low rate of inflation where typically we were expected to cover that through productivity increases within the business, which historically we did. So I think it's going to be a tough ask we're asking, of course. So -- but I think there'll be a lot of resistance across the board to actually building it into the contracts, at least now. I mean, if we go through a more prolonged process, then I think that -- maybe that changes or at least changes temporarily, but I don't see that -- I don't see the major global OEMs making that change across the board because they do it for one, they'll have to do it across the entire supply base.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#11

I wanted to follow up on one of the slides that you showed with the vehicle under wraps, under the blue Dana color. And it looks like a pickup truck, looks like a full-size pickup truck for a 3-in-1 application with 3x the content per vehicle. It just seems a little bit different message. I think you've only been showing that for a couple of quarters now. Prior to that, we've been sort of hearing from you that commercial vehicle seems more attractive when it comes to these electronic drive units or integrated drive modules or e-Propulsion systems, however you want to term that because of less vertical integration, maybe less competition. And that to the extent that you did participate in the light vehicle, e-Propulsion market via integrated solutions, you'd focus on niche, high-torque applications. And when I think high-torque, like Ferrari, for example, which I think you are on, right?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#12

Yes.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#13

But I suppose these full-size pickup trucks, they do have a lot of torque, don't they? So just talk about the extent to which you are intending to throw your hat into the ring on some of these high-volume light vehicle, like drive unit opportunities. Because that is a huge addressable market, right? Do you see yourselves as a niche player there? Or do you see yourselves as a bigger player there than maybe the market [ surmised ] even a year ago?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#14

Yes. So I think we've always seen ourselves as a competitor in the light-vehicle space. I think -- when you think about when this journey began back in '16, we really started to think about what the future across all the end markets look like. Light vehicle was always front and center. Our view was always that it was likely to be a laggard in adoption, not because light-vehicle OEMs weren't interested, but because, historically, we haven't played in the pass car market. So ours is always -- as you saw from the launch, right, we're talking about Super Duty, Wrangler, Ranger, these are all very large, high-torque applications, generally with rigid or fixed beam axles. And we knew that, that would probably be the last 2 to convert, right? And that's played out, right? The first places where our markets converted were -- or we saw a lot of growth was in the bus market, so commercial vehicle, last-mile delivery. And now in off-highway, we're seeing it in material handling, port equipment, right, places where the duty cycle is pretty controlled. So a lot of the RFQs are just now coming out for the larger pickup trucks. So the picture you saw wasn't necessarily representative. It was just supposed to be provoking. So it doesn't necessarily suggest one thing or the other. What I can say is that one of the core tenets of our strategy is that we leverage the core, right? We use our scale across all of our end markets to really drive cost synergies and benefits into our products. And light vehicle offers a very, very large amount of volume. That will drive the cost of motors and inverters and power electronics to a scale where the cost becomes really, really competitive across all of our end markets. So for us, being in the light vehicle market is extremely important to be able to get the scale to offer the very competitive products that we need, not only for light vehicle, but for commercial vehicle and for off-highway.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#15

Another sort of change in your messaging or description and sort of additional new insight I picked up on is now you're talking about 4-in-1, right? Like we hear 3-in-1 a lot. You've kind of went up people. 3-in-1, you got the electric motor, the inverter and the gearbox. And that's the way everyone is talking about. [ Axle ] talks about that way. BorgWarner talks about that way. Magna talks about that way. And you kind of like talk about 4-in-1 now. And I wonder the extent to which that's a significant change. Because you've got power technology, something that maybe other people don't have that you can bundle. I mean, I feel like BorgWarner has got some cooling stuff, but they don't have the battery enclosures. Magna's got the battery enclosures, they don't really have the cooling. I don't know the [ Axle ] has either of them. So talk about the extent to which Power Technologies -- and I keep going back to when Jonathan said that it had the least strategic cohesion of all the units, that was 3, 4 years ago, things are changing. Is Power Technologies now an enabler for go-to-market for you? Is 4-in-1 a real thing and a competitive advantage?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#16

Yes. I would say it absolutely is. Look, we've always thought about the thermal, this really comes out of our thermal business, right? So historically, heat exchangers for oil coolers, engine and transmission along with some other things. But what's really happened is, as we acquired and started to really assimilate the core EV technologies and started to design from the ground up these drive systems, it became very clear that the -- to optimize the systems, you need to start at a base-level design from the individual components and get a system that can really deliver what's needed by the customer in a very efficient package. And a really big part of that efficiency is designing in at the front end the cooling that's needed both for the inverter, for the axle and for the motor, right? And then the battery comes along with it. It's not exactly attached. But that system really is optimized. The drive system is really optimized when you're able to manage the thermal characteristics of the drivetrain. And really, our thermal business gives us a massive advantage in the upfront design and optimization of that system. To your question, is the battery cooling enabler? I would have sort of shared Jonathan's view a few years ago. The team has done really a tremendous job of taking what is really core forming, sealing and thermal management capabilities and turning them into a product that is absolutely lights out the best that's on the market, and that's in the battery cooling. And that really is, I think, opening doors or helping us talk to the customer about, "Hey, here's what we've been able to do on batteries. And by the way, we're on GM's Ultium battery platform, the Ford Lightning, Rivian, right? These are major programs. And those capabilities are now allowing us to really help educate and help the customer understand what our drive systems can deliver and how much more efficient they can be.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#17

As evidenced by the gyrations in the capital markets so far this year, I mean, clearly, Wall Street, people in this room, they're nervous about the macro and about the cycle. And I have an overweight rating on Dana stock. I pitched it to investors, inexpensive leverage to electrification. And kind of some of the feedback I get is, when it comes to the light-vehicle industry, hey, this could be the first recession in the history of the United States where auto production actually rises, as we cycle past all these body blows we've taken with semis and as we rebuild inventories up. But when it comes to industrial equipment, when it comes to construction, people are nervous with higher interest rates that projects will get financed and stuff. And so I think going into your earnings call I feel like, I don't want industrial exposure. But coming out of your call, I mean, you guys -- while you did take down guidance, you took it down on inflation, on cost, like everybody. And the message on the end markets, I think, surprised people, it's like, it's great, really strong demand, things are good. So just kind of how do you -- what's the latest you're seeing on the ground? What's the latest from your customers? What's the latest from order books for commercial vehicles and for tractors and things like that? Is it holding in better than the investors that you talked to on the phone think?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#18

Yes. I mean the end markets across the board are all very, very strong. Order books remain strong on both commercial and on the industrial side. It's -- the fact that the market or the OEMs have not been able to fully ramp up production and fill that gap, I think, is going to elongate the cycle. And even if we do start to have a more macro headwinds, the fact that much of this equipment is aged further than most of the end-market users would like, think about commercial vehicle, right? the fleets, they like to turn their fleets over on a regular schedule. They haven't necessarily been able to do that because of the lack of supply of trucks. They're going to need to complete those refresh cycles. So I do think -- in the same story, right, commodities, in large part, drive the demand for a lot of the off-highway equipment. Yes, construction could be impacted. But again, a lot of this construction equipment that needs to be replaced hasn't been over the normal typical cycle, so I agree. It just doesn't feel like the same sort of cycle that we would normally be in. So we're still seeing -- I mean, our customers are still asking for and wanting additional capacity and additional production. Of course, we're all struggling from a supply chain perspective, both on our customer side and for ourselves. I think a little bit lower demand might actually help sort some of this out, but I don't think we're going to end up in the near term with the same type of deep retraction in end-market demand that we would normally see.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#19

Interesting. Maybe we can get into a little bit of a conversation about electrification adoption and traction by end market. I mean most people here are mostly looking at, I think, the light-vehicle industry and follow that closely. But maybe any trends that you would call out within that underappreciated within light vehicle? I mean pickup truck. I mean what's the latest that you're seeing in terms of how the light-vehicle industry electrification may adopt faster, slower in different segments, et cetera?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#20

Yes. I think our basic tenet still holds true, right? Commercial vehicle is the early adopter and continues to push forward, right? We're right now providing completely electrified full trucks to PACCAR for their electrified medium-duty delivery vehicle. Now eventually, that goes into their [ plant. ] But right now, they wanted to get to market. So we are seeing the demand, they have the demand. I think that, that continues. Because if you really think about it, like think last-mile delivery, think about your Amazon, or in the case of this PACCAR truck, the last-mile delivery for beverage trucks, right, your beer truck, your Pepsi or your Coke truck, right? These trucks, they start and end, they have a known duty cycle. They know how much mass is going to be on the vehicle. They start and end at the same place each day, right? They could be essentially charged. So infrastructure is not a problem, right? That is the perfect use case for an electrified vehicle. And by the way, most of them are in some sort of urban or suburban area where they're not traveling those long distances. So that just seems to make sense why run an ICE, a diesel motor when you know that your beverage delivery truck is going to go 37 miles today and you know exactly how much mass is going to be on it, and you can solve for how much energy you need to store, right? You look at -- so Class 8, right? There's still some issues there, but you're starting to see alternatives, either with hybrids or fuel cells on long-line-haul trucks. And then as you move down the spectrum, light vehicle, right, we're seeing a huge transformation, obviously, in the passenger car and the small SUV. The next natural place this goes is on the larger pickup trucks. Now I still think these are a bit further away. We're just now seeing the first RFQs for what you would term a -- what our core products, which would be fixed rigid beam, axles where you have high torque, the ability to pull and tow and haul. And so those will be forthcoming. And then obviously, you look up here, right, a market that we've never been in, right, lawn care, right? So those are electrified Toro lawn cares, right? Those each have 3 motors. They have inverters on them. That's a segment on the off-highway market that we've never been in. It's never had to be, but we didn't make small motors, but our motors are applicable in there. Reach stacker, right? So that reach stacker there is a real product. The ports are all going to electrify. That's an electrified reach stacker, has our motor, our inverter, has a gearbox on it from -- and all the ancillaries from Brevini, Oerlikon and our Spicer. So I think it's -- the progression for EV, I think, is only going to continue to accelerate, and we're well positioned across all these end markets to provide those products to the customer.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#21

Yes. I think the port vehicles is really quite interesting. And you could see different niche applications. What about -- because we keep talking about things electrifying that we wouldn't have thought previously, including you mentioned Class 8 long haul, I mean, eventually, right? And in hydrogen. What about the heaviest equipment? I had a company here yesterday, very small publicly traded company, Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation. I don't know if you come across them. But they talked about how Caterpillar and Deere, like they've had a trade show some electric bulldozer-type vehicles. And just curious, I think I've been in some meetings with you before where you talked about, okay, maybe in some very niche applications like Manhattan, for example, even cranes and stuff, they don't want diesel smokes fuming on the sidewalk. Say 3, 4, 5 years from now, are we even going to be talking about heavy industrial equipment outside of these niche applications being electrified? Does it make sense to invest so far ahead of the revenue generation? Or is that something that you've looked at or may consider looking at?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#22

Yes, I think the -- so on your first point, I think that at some point, most, if not all, of these applications will electrify, right? The technologies, the ability to carry enough battery capacity on these vehicles will allow them to be electrified. They have to solve the ability to charge these vehicles on site. But I think as these technologies and storage, portable solar, whatever it is, I think you're going to end up with the ability to have these vehicles, more of these vehicles at larger scales and larger sizes become electrified. Some will not possibly be able to. There will be situations, I think, where just some of these vehicles will always be -- will be not electrified. Or fuel cell technology will get them to the point where they can carry hydrogen or store hydrogen on site and create the electricity that way or perhaps a portable fuel cell, right? But I do think that, that will. Right now, the biggest applications are on the smaller end, right? It's inside, like you mentioned, Manhattan or London or inside urban areas where they don't want any emissions, and those applications will have to be electrified today, but they have already power source if they're inside in Manhattan. So it's -- charging is not an issue. But I mean our customers are coming to us every day, especially in the off-highway space, asking for us to help them solve these problems. And they're coming generally to somebody like Dana because we have the ability to provide them with a -- not just a motor or an inverter, but an entire drive system and, in some cases, an entire system to drive the ancillary products that are -- or work systems that are on these vehicles.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#23

Let me pause there and see if there are any questions in the audience. If not, I'll ask one on capital allocation. I think previously you guys have been talking about driving down towards more 1x net-debt leverage, more investment-grade-type credit metrics, including as you increasingly compete with technology companies, et cetera. Just curious what the latest thinking there is and how you sort of weigh debt paydown versus inorganic growth opportunities. How is the portfolio? How complete is it? Are there still areas that you're looking to build out?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#24

Sure. I think it's easy. We are comfortable being in the 1, 1.5x levered. That's where I'd like the balance sheet to be. And so we'll commit -- we're going to commit free cash flow over the next few years to make sure that we get the leverage ratio down to where we want it. Now some of that will get helped as EBITDA grows, right? So we're a little bit -- math is working against us with EBITDA where it's at today, but I think that will continue to improve. In terms of inorganic, we've spent a lot -- we've made a number of acquisitions over the past 3, 4, 5 years. So from an electrification and competencies, I think we are -- we have all of the major competencies that we need. We don't see anything out there that we think we need to go spend a great deal in. Now will there be niche, smaller tuck-ins? So think of a Pi Innovo, we made some. Sure, those could come up. We could find a need, usually probably driven by something that a customer has come and said, "Hey, we really need X, Y or Z." And perhaps we need to do something that's tuck-in, but those would be relatively small, mainly driven by some specific need. But overarchingly, we own in-house the capabilities, like I said, from a 4-in-1 system to produce design, develop, manufacture and deliver a complete 4-in-1 system across all these end markets.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#25

Maybe the last question. We talked about how your 4-in-1 approach could perhaps confer go-to-market advantages relative to a 3-in-1 approach. What about, though, the Cummins acquisition of Meritor? Does it change anything? Is there a superior go-to-market offering, engine or powertrain plus driveline together? Does that impact Dana in any way?

Timothy Kraus

executive
#26

No. Look, I mean, Cummins is a great company. They're well managed. And Meritor, we've competed against, obviously, for a long, long time. My view is the name changed on the door. It's not Meritor anymore. It's Cummins. But I think it's a validation that the driveline is moving south from the vehicle. It's moving from the engine and transmission to the axle, which is where we -- our core competency starts. Meritor was the axle. Cummins obviously felt that that's where they needed to be in the vehicle, and so they acquired that versus developing it themselves. I think, for us, we're going to stay at the course. We have the in-house capability to take our core mechanical and turn it into a 4-in-1 system. So we think it's -- we think we have the competitive product to win.

Ryan Brinkman

analyst
#27

Okay. Great. Thanks. It looks like we are over on time. So please join me in thanking Tim for all the great color and insight.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Dana Incorporated transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Dana Incorporated earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.