Data Patterns (India) Limited (DATAPATTNS.NS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to Data Patterns (India) Limited Q1 FY '26 Earnings Conference Call hosted by Go India Advisors. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand over the conference to Ms. Monali Jain from Go India Advisors. Thank you, and over to you, ma'am.

Thanks, Pari. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Data Patterns (India) Limited earnings call to discuss Q1 FY '26 earnings. We have the senior management of the company on call, Mr. S. Rangarajan, Chairman and Managing Director; and Mr. Venkata Subramanian, Chief Financial Officer. We must remind you that the discussion on today's call may include certain forward-looking statements and must be therefore viewed in conjunction with the risks that company faces. May I now request Mr. Rangarajan to take us through the company's business outlook and financial highlights, subsequent to which we can open the floor for Q&A. Thank you, and over to you, sir.

Thank you, Monali. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I'm pleased to welcome you all to our Q1 FY '26 earnings call. I hope you had the opportunity to review our earnings presentation, which is available on the stock exchanges and on our website. Before Venkata takes you through the financial performance, let me start by sharing some key updates and strategic commentary from my end. We have delivered a reasonable start to the year despite some delays in customer approvals that impacted the pace of revenue recognition. Nevertheless, the quarter has met our expectations. Our order book now stands at a strong INR 1,079 crores with more than INR 320 crores of orders received since the start of the financial year, including some orders from BrahMos and MOD. Our export order book remains healthy at about INR 100 crores, and we're seeing increasing traction from international markets. Post the Operation Sindoor, we are witnessing heightened urgency from the government to procure and deploy indigenous defense equipment, some of which aligns well with our capabilities. However, to participate meaningfully in such opportunities, it is critical that companies have fully developed products and complete internal trials before submission. This underscores our strategy. We must build first to be eligible to win. At Data Patterns, we have consistently invested ahead of the curve to expand our addressable market, especially in areas where there are no existing domestic products. Our goal is to identify these opportunities, leverage our core competencies and develop differentiated capabilities that give us a sustainable edge. We remain deeply committed to R&D and product development. We already deployed over INR 120 crores in the new product development activities with a focus on building indigenous capabilities across radar systems, electronic warfare, communication systems and airborne systems. Our continued efforts in the product development have resulted in products of international quality. We are optimistic that these products will soon be tested and potentially lead to bigger contracts. These initiatives align with our long-term strategy to scale our total addressable market, and we're doing that with discipline and foresight. At the same time, we remain unwavering in our focus on profitability and value creation to our stakeholders. To conclude, the environment is shaping up positively, both domestically and globally. Our pipeline is strong and we're confident of achieving full year growth guidance of 20% to 25%, revenue growth while maintaining healthy EBITDA margins in the 35% to 40% range. With that, I'll now hand it over to Venkata to walk you through the financials in more detail.

Thank you, sir, and good morning, everyone. Let me take you through the financial highlights for the first quarter of FY '26. Q1 FY '26 revenue stood at INR 99 crores, down by about 4.6% year-on-year due to customer approval-related delays that deferred dispatches and revenue recognition. Cost of goods sold declined by 30% year-on-year due to favorable product metrics. EBITDA came in at around INR 32 crores, with margin at 32.3%, showcasing our operational efficiency even on a lower top line. Net profit stood at INR 25.5 crores with PAT margin at 25.7%, highlighting our continued focus on profitability. We expect pickup in the execution and revenue growth from Q2 onwards backed by a strong order book and visibility. As mentioned earlier, we remain firmly on track to meet our stated guidance of 20% to 25% revenue growth. With that, I now open the floor for questions. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Dipen Vakil from PhillipCapital.

Sir, my first question is on the lines of -- so this quarter, out of INR 183 crores of order wins, majorly, we have won orders on the AMC side or services side of contracts. So can you tell us more about this contract in terms of their execution period and the cyclicity? Or when we can -- how is the ordering pattern for it, whether they are awarded yearly? So can you give us some -- shed some more light on these orders?

The main AMC contract we received is from BrahMos. This is for a 5-year AMC, but it's predated AMC from -- starting from last January. I think January or March.

February.

February. So this is -- normally, we do the AMC in 3 years to 5 years for BrahMos. And this is a 5-year AMC contract, which is billable yearly.

Okay. So we can expect similar contracts to come in every 5 years or every year?

See what happens is this 5-year contract is for orders executed. And post warranty, these contracts have come forward. We executed earlier. We also have orders for additional BrahMos deliverables this year. We're also expecting additional BrahMos orders because more orders are now coming from BrahMos from the Air Force and Navy. So those back-to-back orders we expect also from -- to Data Patterns. We also expect more seeker orders. So it's a question of older orders, we get AMC. As and when the new orders come and their warranty period is over, we again get an AMC. It's a comprehensive AMC we get from BrahMos. It's been going on for 10 years plus now.

And there are some few products where warranty is still continuing. So once that warranty is completed, we will get AMC contracts on those systems also.

Got it, sir. Sir, and talking about the order pipeline that you also mentioned that there's a strong order pipeline right now. And also recently, government has granted AoN for a fire control system for BrahMos. Sir, so is it possible for you to give us that out of INR 2,000 crores to INR 3,000 crores of order inflows that you're expecting in 18 to 24 months, how much of -- can we achieve more than INR 1,200 crores in this year, which will help us to sustain like the decent execution visibility going ahead? So can you give us some more clarity on that?

The number of contracts which we're executing, which we expect -- there is rollover of this Ashwini contract. This is still not -- we haven't got the order. They -- we hear they've got an order. Back-to-back discussions are on, we expect the contract maybe in the next 3 to 5, 6 months' time. That also should come this year. There are a number of contracts, which -- for airborne radars which we've done development. These also are expected to fructify in the next 5, 6 months' time. Similarly, we have a list of this kind of what we call the order pipeline and where we are a single vendor. So the contracts are supposed to happen. So we believe in the next 6, 7, 8 months probably before end of the year or early next year, we should get some INR 1,000-plus crores orders. We are also on -- the other thing, we've also done development -- product development using the funds taken from the market. These are all mature, getting to development maturity. We expect there will be some development contracts for these orders for flight testing. So we have a list of such contracts. I don't know whether I can tell you exactly which line item or how much the value is going to be. But the order pipeline of this INR 1,000, INR 2,000 crores we're talking about are INR 2 billion to INR 3 billion which we're talking about is all based on those kind of contracts.

The next question is from the line of Hardik Rawat from IIFL Capital.

My first question would be with regards to the delays that you mentioned. So sir, could you please tell us exactly which orders have faced these delays in customer testing? And what could be the quantum of slippage in revenue recognition that we've seen in the quarter?

I don't want to name customer and value. Value, I can tell you around maybe INR 27 crores. But they just started testing now. Last 10 days, work has started. Customer acceptance has started. So if this goes on properly, we should be able to bill it in the coming quarters. But this is what is planned. At least every quarter, we plan to bill it this quarter. But because of inspections getting delayed substantially, we were not able to do this for the last 1 year. But inspection has started now. So hopefully, that will get billed probably this quarter.

Got it, sir. Sir, another question was with regards to your commentary on the order inflows. Now your commentary is quite encouraging. And it would be a fair assumption that roughly INR 15 billion-plus worth of order for the full fiscal is something that we should be looking at, INR 15 billion to INR 20 billion on an overall basis?

There are contracts likely to happen. But unfortunately, we are not able to cover the exact time of the contract now because there are some delays happening which is beyond our control. But yes, INR 15 billion can happen, maybe slightly less or slightly more, but it depends on how government really moves these kind of products. But more than -- other than what we've already done, there are other products which are going through MOD FET. This is what's called part of the tender, they're going through field evaluation trials on EW. There are a few products ongoing in EW. We successfully crossed an EW product. So we expect the tender bid open. Hopefully, we will get the order. And some more are in pipeline next month, this coming month and next month. Some more are -- these are all products which is 100% designed in-house vis-a-vis other companies which we import and integrate, has been designed in-house. We expect some traction in EW programs on [ air link ] and [ comms ] and ground systems. So there are requirements like this. Similarly, there are requirements of single tendering for a radar warning receivers, which is going to be airborne for Sukhoi 30 and other platforms. Those are also expected. So timing may vary now and then. But other than the pipeline which we've talked about, the new requirements that Modi have come up because of this Operation Sindoor, and we're also participating in those kind of contracts now. We probably started about 2 years back developing these products, truck-mounted systems. So the specifications are meeting, and we are continuously improving specifications to see that we meet the international specs and meet the customer requirements. So we expect some more contracts in those areas also. Plus the -- our seeker for BrahMos has successfully flight tested. We expect some contracts to happen in the next coming months. And after that, once that is delivered, we're talking about some 100 systems, et cetera. But most of the seekers now -- all the seekers now are imported seekers for BrahMos, the idea is to make this indigenous. If this happens now, I expect a substantial increase in order as we go around in the coming year.

Got it, sir. Sir, speaking of BrahMos, what would be sort of a value of orders that we could see, say, for example, 100 of these systems get -- assuming that we receive that order, what could be the potential order size?

It's a bit premature. Let me get closer to it. First, we'll get the development order executed. And then towards nearing the date, we'll be able to tell you the size of order because I don't want to predict the value business before inquiry comes from BrahMos. That will not be correct. So I can only tell you it would be substantial. And these are all the things which will give me yearly -- see, what we're trying to do is you can't have a 1-year contract order book for that -- that does not augur well for defense agencies, especially on capital goods. We need to have at least 3, 4 years of order book. And then only we can invest in scale. We are doing the multi here in India. Because you need to have products and to address the market, we are actually putting our money and developing hundreds of crores or putting money and developing and getting the products online, then going through evaluation trials and things like that. It's a very hard way of growing. But the only way accessible to us. Otherwise, it's just only collaboration. So we have taken the hard route and going through what we think we are competent and where there are no such product available in India, so we're trying to be unique in that and building products and putting our money and effort on this. So it's a different strategy which what we're doing and I think it will pan out in the next 5, 6 months. You'll see that some traction is happening in all these areas.

I appreciate it, sir. Sir, one last question before I get back to the queue. Our employee costs have seen a 27% Y-o-Y escalation. Just wanted to understand what has driven this? Is this headcount-driven or simply wage inflation?

No. It is headcount-driven. There is wage revision plus headcount-driven. Suppose we want, from a INR 700 crores, to be a INR 5,000 crores company in the next, let's say, 4 years, 5 years, we need to book not just the products. We are building upfront products, going through flight test, getting qualified, so the orders can come in the next 2 to 3 years' time. Once you do that, you also need to have people to see that we produce the kind of -- we cannot scale like this. These are all complex products. And though we do automated test equipment to produce them in numbers as we go along, the types which you do is so large, it is not the same type of product which is done in 100,000 pieces. It becomes very simple. The types are so large and so many and all are complex that it is necessary to have quality people, trained people to do this. So we have started recruiting people, training them for their requirement as we go along. The second thing -- third thing we are doing also is creating infrastructure, production infrastructure, anticipating these contracts to happen. So we will be spending now so that we will be able to deliver in 3 years from now or 2 years from now, the contract happens and deliver. You can't deliver. Suddenly it takes INR 700 crores, to INR 1,500 crores to INR 2,500 crores. It's not practical. We can't do it. We need to put in the infrastructure and see the delivery model happens. So these are all cautiously done and we are going ahead and investing in people and training. And that is how the cost is going up.

The next question is from the line of Amit Dixit from Goldman Sachs.

A couple of questions, sir. The first one is on the -- if I look at the order inflow texture, so FY '24-'25 orders have largely been -- order inflow had largely been on production side. But Q1 FY '26 has been skewed on services side. So just wanted to understand that whether this is the kind of pattern that we will see going ahead, also that services would be a major portion? Or it is just that certain orders have been delayed and we expect the normal order profile to be back to 70%, 75% of production? And whatever services we get, it will be, of course, plus, over and above that.

See, it cannot be a service-oriented business what we have because we don't have too many contracts actually delivered to customers. Order delivered today, mostly in the last 10, 15, 20 years has been to DRDO. And that doesn't mature into a services contract or AMC contact later. Only when it goes to the actual users, services contract starts happening. So this has just started, right, we're just starting with the users. Direct deliveries to MOD, Army, Air Force is happening now. That will then mature into service contracts. So what you see in BrahMos is a long term -- in 2006, we've been delivering BrahMos branches. So the services contracts happening with more and more BrahMos deliveries, more service content happening from that. It's one of the few contracts which is happening like this. Many more should happen, only once you put -- populate more hardware orders on the -- with the users. This will happen in the next few years. So our main order book will be on actual delivery contracts as well as development contracts. But this year, I think from this year onwards, the development contracts have become lesser and we think the delivery production contracts will become more. We've taken a lot of development contracts earlier. This will all, hopefully in the next year or so, mature into production contracts as we go along. And now that we are doing our own in-house development for MOD requirements, we expect direct delivery contracts to happen -- or production contracts to happen with the MOD.

Got it. The second one is on the recent AoN that was recorded for INR 67,000 crores. Now if we look at it, there are several items that actually fall within your purview. So any broad idea of TAM you would like to provide from that INR 67,000 crores? And also on the execution side, we saw that Q1 FY '26 was skewed towards BEL. So is it the kind of revenue profile that we will see during the year or to just in this particular quarter?

I can't comment on the AoN because what is realizable out of those contracts, when you bulk it together, I won't be able to comment on it. We only look at contracts which is accessible to us. So not just -- whatever AoN is published, we don't really look at it very seriously. So I can't comment on that. On the second area which you're talking about, it all depends on the kind of contract, whether it be BEL or HAL or ECIL or MOD and depending on the timeliness of when they want the delivery to happen. So that -- it depends on that, not necessarily it will only be BEL-oriented or any other automation oriented. It depends on the mix of contracts that we get. Ours is not a quarterly revenue business. That is why we are saying that towards the end of the year, a lot of contracts will get delivered towards the end of the year, maintaining our -- whatever position we've taken, say a 20%, 25% growth. Actually, what I expect is the top line growth is further. My more worry is on the bottom line. We wanted to retain 20%, 25% bottom line growth is what we plan to do. So that is where our focus is and also increase the scale of the business.

The next question is from the line of Jyoti Gupta from Nirmal Bang.

My question was on a similar line in terms of BEL. Two things that I wanted to understand was, one, is there -- while you have different platforms where you're actually delivering, is there a course where the margins I had anticipated slightly higher, is that -- are we getting lesser margins from BEL compared to other platforms? Or is it like this quarter has been a little bit of a washout? Second is, you will be delivering the radars of the EW for HAL and that is -- it looks like high. But if the numbers for LCA Mark-1s increase for FY '26, which is likely to happen given the engines will be delivered on time, higher than what we expected, like we were expecting 5 LCAs, but I think we should look at something like a 7 to 8 LCAs this year. Will that not also help you improve your revenue as well as your profitability? Just your thoughts on that.

Okay. On the first question which you had, you said our margins have come down. Actually, our margins have gone up. Gross margins have gone up to 80%. I thought we have done very well on the gross margin. You're probably talking EBITDA. EBITDA is a different story because the top line comes down, expenses remain the same. So EBITDA comes down. But our gross margins have increased. So the profitability has actually increased, not come down. And this -- as and when the revenue goes up, EBITDA also will go up because that is a fixed cost to the company, which will go up. So I don't think we are worried about our profitability at the present moment. Whatever you're delivering, go over this. It doesn't matter which the organization is. They are IP-driven products. Our profitability has only gone up. The point is the revenue has come down because of nondelivery in certain items because of customer acceptance delays. So that is what was explained earlier also. So that is actually the reason why we could not deliver what we want to deliver. But that is getting compensated next quarter. And some of the orders which -- have taken a long lead time for manufacturing, design, development and manufacturing. So it doesn't fall in the quarter-to-quarter category. So this will happen during the course of this year. The larger orders -- 1 order we've already executed last year. One large order, INR 180 crores, we expect to execute this quarter or next quarter. So it's been 1.5 years kind of development time frames. Those take a lot of time to build. It's a very, very complex system, so it's taking time. So that is the first question. I think you misread our numbers. On the second on LCA Mark-1A, we don't actually do much in LCA Mark-1A. We are doing the cockpit displays, and that is the one thing which we have on an order. They want more for the additional 97. The inquiry has come. We have not quoted because what we already developed, the deliveries have not happened to HAL. So after HAL picks up the delivery and pays us, then we will make quotes for other things. But we do have orders for the LCA Mark-2. We do the glass cockpit, which is called the Large Area Display, LAD order. It's a very modern system, thinnest system in the world like an F-35 that we'll be delivering in the next 3, 4 months' time. We do the mission systems for LCA Mark-2. We have the order to do that. We expect that we should populate LCA Mark-2 with a lot more of our products, including the EW. LCA Mark-1A also, we had the EW, which is flying very well. But unfortunately, government decided to import it from [ Data ]. Data and Uttam Radar is not being considered presently under the change in things. So accordingly, because it comes to the package, we didn't get the hardware, though it is flying very well. But we will be considered for the Mark-2 and we are also being considered for Sukhoi 30 for that. So there are a number of such programs, which we're working on. But LCA Mark-1A we're not very sure really what is the level of contribution unless they take our new radars and port it to LCA Mark-1A. This is all on a discussion stage. I can't comment on it at present. But we're very, very bullish on the future. There may be 1 or 2 programs we are not in but on an overall level, if you take, since you have done a lot of product development, we are very bullish about scaling the company and looking at contracts beyond INR 5,000, INR 10,000 crores in the next few years' time. That is where we are trying to pitch our business.

Okay. Sir, I would like to understand one more thing on jammer ports that you have worked on, where all is it being -- who have been -- I mean, which platforms are there being used? And what's the kind of order that you received on that.

See, we can't receive an order. The government has no provision to place an order on private sector at the present moment, unless we go through an RFP and a proposal of RFI/RFP and open tender. However important or needed the whole contract is for them, they cannot do this. But it is proceeding very well. We have developed the part which is going through air trials now, air trials meaning aerodynamic trials and the liquid coolant trials are all going on. It will be finished in the next 1 month. Our own methodology of jamming technologies, techniques is being tested. The hardware has been fully realized. So that is being tested. Hopefully, in the next 1, 1.5 months, we can finish it. We've also made an offer to Air Force to fit it into the SU-30. They have taken it very positively because of the -- this is a self-protection jammer, which is fitted to all the aircraft. It goes in the wingtips of both the -- both the wingtips and this will be jamming coverage. So since we have done this and they've seen it, they've taken a very positive view about it. Internally, they are discussing how to give us a Sukhoi 30 to do a no cost, no commitment trials. We believe in the next 1 week, we should get clearance to accommodate a Sukhoi 30 for us, is really to see that we do flight trials. And once the flight trials are over, then the inquiries will start for flight tested equipment. We believe that there is no other company in India. Of course, DRDO's there, they're already having a part, and that is also going to go through flight test. So we'll have an alternative, and we believe we have done very, good very modern, low weight, better aerodynamic part with more jamming efficacy, more power. So we believe we stand a very good chance in this. But we have to go through the rigors of flight testing. It will take us 1, 1.5 years to do this. Post that, the requirements are large. In January of this year, government has -- MOD escalated that for some [ INR 7,400 crores ] for the jammer part for the EW suite. We have the RWR. We have all the antenna. And everything on the jammer port plus the jammer port has been designed in-house. So we become automatically a player to be considered as long as we do the flight testing, and Air Force has promised us that they'll give us a Sukhoi 30 to flight test. So government is very positive on industry participation in industry-driven R&D. And after delivering validation of the 5 systems in ground, they're willing to even spend on flight testing on their own, which is a welcome difference in the last 10 years. So we believe we are very well positioned there. But for all this to happen, because this contract value is about INR 10,000 crores, requirements are there. So we believe that we are well positioned in it. But all this will take time for it to -- this is all the TAM I'm talking about, this upfront money we're taking to develop. But it's -- we have done our end of the job. We believe that we'll continue to do well. So probably another year from now, I'll be able to answer your question more clearly.

The next question is from the line of Krishna Doshi from [ Ashika ] Stock Services.

While most of my questions have already been answered, I have a question that like right now, we just mentioned that the development contracts are going to go down, while we are going to see an increase in the production contracts. So just trying to understand further how is it going to impact our margins?

See it doesn't matter what contract we take of development or production because our company normally funds the development ourselves. So the price is given for the production value, only the price is given to customers even during development contract. So actually, we don't charge a nonrecurring development fee in most of the contracts we take up. So I don't think there is any difference between production and development in terms of gross margins. And the second is, during production contract, there is also -- government compensates us for the U.S. dollar exchange rate and reputation. All this is also taken care by them when a production contract happens. So typically, we don't think we have a problem between margins and type of contracts.

Okay, sir. And is it possible to quantify like what sort of orders are we expecting, when it comes to the emergency procurement? Like what will be the quantum of the orders that you are expecting?

Very difficult to predict, ma'am, because emerging procurement has a bunch of requirements, and out of which some of them we can address, but these have to be demonstrated field evaluation trials have to happen. And then you pass the field evaluation trials, then you are -- the lowest court gets a contract. It's a lot of competitive bids. Most of the emergency procurement contracts goes towards either PSUs or indirect imports through an Indian agent or made in India, some kind of a company. We have our own designs where IP belongs us. In EW, we have done a lot of work. Similarly, some of the systems in avionics, their procurement is happening now, and we are participating in these kind of replacing imported systems with Indian capabilities. But what we will turn out in terms of contract book, I cannot tell you. And we are confident that EW some of the things we will be able to convert because we have done all the development in-house, so we should be cost effective is what we are thinking. But only when the commercial bids are open, we will know. So I can't really detail out extent of value of contracts. This has to come quarter-to-quarter as and when we win the contract.

Okay, sir. And just a last question. So it was regarding on the export side, now that we are seeing the NATO rearmament plan and as we already know, we are doing a substantial export to the U.K. market. So just trying to understand how are we going to scale up there? And is it that now we are seeing better opportunities in export also? Like earlier, I remember you saying that our focus is the domestic demand. Like are we now shifting our focus towards export?

Yes, our focus still remains domestic because there's a huge untapped market. We import 80% of our defense requirements, in various forms, though it is finally called Indian-made. A lot of systems, subsystems in that is imported. So the focus is to try where we have competencies in technologies and IP capabilities. We can differentiate on the rest of Indian companies. We would like to focus on that because there is immediate need and it's a long-term need to see that we can address those needs. So we will do that. But however, we don't want to -- not to look at export, we would like to look at export. But the NATO country, whatever you're talking about, those requirements is to scale up defense equipment, et cetera, they have a local supply chain. It's very difficult to break that supply chain to build available systems. And new technologies normally they try to do within their own country. None other countries like to import defense equipment, different technologies. Nobody likes to import. Western Countries don't import defense technology of outside us. So what really comes down to company -- countries in India is manufacturing contracts to reduce their cost. That is really what happens though we do manufacturing also, our focus is not pure and fire EMS line. We are an IP-driven organization. So we try to build that value and then build and then sell. So where that is possible, we are trying to do that. Yes, in U.K., we've been doing some work. We expect that to increase. We're also trying to do some more work with the same U.K. company. They're transferring certain technologies in manufacturing. But these are value-driven products, not manufacturing for manufacturing per se. Similarly, we are trying to also look at collaborations in certain disciplines where we can not only look at contracts abroad. But more importantly, these can get indigenized and main Indian company for Indian markets, we can produce them. So we'll get some opportunities. We have to expand our scale you go along, we had to put the marketing organization for, but this is a slightly longer-term goal, take us 3 years to put the marketing infrastructure and then address U.S. and European markets. But what we can do is once the products are done in India, full products are done by us. We can also sell to Far East Asian countries, other than Western countries, we can also sell the contracts in systems to. So there is automatically a byproduct of what we do in India and get exported because a lot of products are technology advanced and second to none. So we should be able to address the market, but that's going to take a bit more longer. First, we improved in India, then we can export it.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of [ Jay Jahan ] from [indiscernible] Asset Managers.

Am I audible?

Yes.

So I just have 1 question. Like with companies like Astra Microwave also working with RF & Microwave and radar domains, what are your key differentiators when competing for tenders? And how does it work exactly, sir?

See we also do RF & Microwave. We don't do only RF & Microwave. we already also -- like them, we started like a subsystem and some part of the system. We're graduating ourselves to a complete systems company now. We have more than 100 mechanical engineers doing mechanical design on thermal structure. So we are putting people to design full systems on Radar Signal Processing and everywhere, similarly IP for EW, IP and radar, IP and communication. So I think these are the differentiators. We are not on RF & Microwave alone. We do RF & Microwave also. That's not the only end to what we do. We want to build complete systems.

Right, sir. Understood. But if you look at -- if I look at the competitor, like for example, Axis case, if you take an example, they're also doing complete subsystems like in radar domains. And I just wanted to understand like how does this work in the tender system when you apply for the key competency that you have in the specific product? And like how do you win tenders for the same? Is it divided between the companies? And how does it work exactly?