Deepak Fertilisers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited (500645) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

August 12, 2021

BSE Limited IN Materials Chemicals earnings 69 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good day and welcome to Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited Q1 FY '22 Earnings Conference Call hosted by IIFL Securities Limited. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Abhijit Akella from IIFL Securities. Thank you. And over to you, Mr. Akella.

Abhijit Akella

analyst
#2

Yes. Thank you, Nirav. So ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon and thank you for joining us on the 1Q FY '22 earnings conference call of Deepak Fertilisers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited. It's my pleasure to introduce the company's senior management team who are here with us to discuss the results. We have with us Mr. Sailesh Mehta, Chairman and Managing Director; Mr. Amitabh Bhargava, President and CFO; Mr. Mahesh Girdhar, President, Crop Nutrition Business; Mr. Suparas Jain, VP, Corporate Finance; Mr. Debasish Kedia, GM, Corporate Finance; and Mr. Deepak Balwani, Head of Investor Relations. We'll begin the call with opening remarks by the management team. And thereafter, we can open up for a Q&A session. I would now like to hand the call over to Mr. Mehta to take proceedings forward. Thank you. And over to you, sir.

Sailesh Mehta

executive
#3

Yes. Thank you, Abhijit. I hope my voice is clear. A very good afternoon to all of you. I hope you and your family have taken the second COVID shot and are all safe and sound. I take the pleasure of welcoming all of you for the Q1 FY '22 earnings conference call. And I also hope you've had a chance to look at the financial statements and earnings presentation that was uploaded on the exchanges on our website. So at the outset, I'm quite happy to share that the top line grew by around 37.6%. The EBITDA moved up by 6.7% and net profit by 7.8%. And I would like to share that this is indeed a very good performance in light of the fact that in our raw materials, ammonia shot up by 102%, phos acid jumped up by 49%, our RGP propylene that shot up by 50%. And despite such huge hikes, thanks to better capacity utilization, cost optimization, product differentiation that we have been working at that we could enhance the margins and improve the fixed good pricing to pass on a good chunk of these, I would say, price hikes. Typically, the finished good pricing reflects the higher costs normally over 1 or 2 quarters. And so we see that positively play out in the following quarters also. Now the industrial chemicals grew by 12%. And the broad, I would say, shift that is happening of speciality chemicals from China to India continues to provide a good boost to our acid business. Though in the acid side, in our Dahej facility, we advanced -- we preponed our scheduled shutdown maintenance because we found a good pocket. And so that -- while this quarter had an 18 days kind of plant shutdown, in the next few quarters, we will be seeing the advantage emerging. As far as IPA goes, there was a certain impact emerging out of the COVID-related disruptions. But fundamentally, we see that for the pharmaceutical sector, IPA demand and requirements will continue to grow as the pharma sector grows. In the second zone of our businesses, as far as mining chemicals goes, we recorded a growth of 54%. And [ Alden ], which is our top grade premium product, also has improved. But we are seeing that the cement and infrastructure sector is yet to kind of recover back to the pre-COVID days, but it's a matter of I think a little time. And we are seeing that possibly the second half of the year, post the monsoon, will be something where we will see a positive traction. Monsoons, in any case, it's a little low season for the mining sector. As far as the crop nutrition business goes, we're -- here, we are seeing indeed another very good quarterly performance, and the segment grew by 66.6%. And of course, this is the seventh consecutive quarter of profitability that we were -- we had gone through a tough patch and with the highest ever on our nitrophosphate and our NPK production. And despite all these lockdowns because of COVID, we could manage over 4,000 digital webinars and reaching out to over 60,000 farmers with our product value proposition. And more and more, we are now fairly confident as we see the resonance on the marketplace that our conviction in our differentiated product strategy and the way we have put in various other strategies, go-to-market strategies that it was indeed something that is playing out and it will be something on a sustained basis that we will see good results. As far as our overall CapEx plan goes, the ammonia plant that we had planned and the TAN plant in the East Coast, both are all in good control, running as per schedule. And both these additions once implemented is going to solidify the strong foundations of the company and help sustain and enhance our leadership that has been built over 40 years. So now from a larger perspective, I might share that the 4-pronged strategies that we have put in place are something that we are working hard at and we are seeing very, very positive traction. One is to get our size right. And now with our fertilizer expansion all be done behind us and is doing very good acid that we had enhanced our capacities, there, we are seeing it turn very positive. And similarly, it would be TAN. And all of these are beautifully aligned with the India growth story. So getting our size right was the first strategy that we had planned, and that is something that is bearing fruits. The second is that we have invested a lot of energies into building a strong backbone of best-in-class systems and procedures, processes based on digital and IT powers. And that is giving us a strong grip on cost optimization as well as the grip on the marketplace. So that's the second, I would say, strong strategic drive that we had brought in. The third that we have been working on is the backward integration, which will ensure that we bring more value into the whole chain, which is something that we have taken up in terms of the ammonia facility. And that is going to be, again, something that will help enhance the leadership that we have in the downstream over the last 40 years. And lastly, and the most important one, is the shift from commodity to speciality that we have started or from just products to holistic solutions to the final end consumers. And so that in all the 3 businesses that we are into, industrial chemicals, mining chemicals and the crop nutrition business, all the 3 then try to move from customer to consumers and providing them holistic solutions that we are seeing a very strong, very positive traction and that promises to unfold an exciting future. So on that note, I would like to hand over to Mr. Amitabh Bhargava, our President and CFO, for a more detailed explanation on the performance of the quarter. Amitabh?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#4

Yes. Thank you, Mr. Mehta. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining the Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals conference call to discuss Q1 FY '22 results. Our performance during the quarter, as Mr. Mehta was explaining, remained strong despite pandemic-related challenges and significant adverse movement of input prices. This was supported by differentiated product value proposition, operational efficiencies, increased capacity utilization and proactive marketing strategies. So during Q1 FY '22, we reported a total operating revenue of INR 1,902 crores, an increase of 37.6% compared to last year. Our operating EBITDA stood at INR 290 crores, an increase of about 7% Y-o-Y. Net profit for the year recorded a growth of 7.8% to INR 131 crores, net margins of 6.8%. There has been a sharp increase in 3 key raw material prices Y-o-Y and even sequentially quarter-on-quarter. But Y-o-Y, if you see, ammonia prices have gone up 102%; phos acid prices, up 49%; propylene, [ or coffee bean ], that is RGP, 50%; and MOP, up 7%. In the short term, these higher raw material prices have created a headwind that we expect to stabilize over the next few quarters. Now here, government has also been taking proactive initiatives to support fertilizer manufacturers and farmers, for example, increasing NBS subsidy and allocating additional budgets. Overall, our net debt, we further reduced by approximately another INR 240 crores during the quarter. Finance costs reduced by 22% Y-o-Y driven by continuous reduction of short-term debt due to better working capital management. And our focus on liquidation of products in the fertilizer business from retailer shelves supported working capital efficiencies during the quarter. Manufactured mining chemicals business recorded a revenue of INR 389 crores compared to INR 253 crores same period last year. And volume grew by 11% Y-o-Y and reduced 12% sequentially quarter-on-quarter. And demand was subdued as the second wave of COVID affected demand from coal, from cement and infrastructure sectors. During the quarter, our manufactured industrial chemicals business recorded a revenue of INR 318 crores compared to INR 283 crores same period last year. The revenue grew despite having a high base on account of increased IPA realizations last year, which was in aberration. The growth was supported by 34% increase in nitric acid volumes. IPA sales volumes declined by 11.2% Y-o-Y. Due to the first COVID impact, as you know, IPA prices in the quarter 1 FY '21 saw an unprecedented spike. And as expected, the current quarter has seen an overall softening of IPA prices. Nationwide pandemic-related restrictions affected the industry operations and thereby demand of nitric acid products, particularly for the spot market customers. Dahej facility also, as Mr. Mehta was explaining earlier, we advanced the scheduled maintenance shutdown for a period of 18 days, which resulted in lower volumes in quarter 1. Our crop nutrition business segment continued its growth momentum. And in terms of volume, it delivered 25% increase in bulk volumes Y-o-Y. Differentiated NPK, that is the Smartek, their volumes went up 39% Y-o-Y to INR 1.31 lakh tonne that by, again, continued market development activities to create demand from the farmers. Overall, quarter 1 FY '22 CNB revenues increased by 66.6% to INR 993 crores. During the quarter, our IPA plant operated at a capacity utilization of 93% and both acid and TAN operated at 86% and 103%, respectively. In the crop nutrition segment, NP, NPK plants operated with utilization levels of 92%. And the bentonite sulfur plant operated at 76% utilization level. The available capacity across our plants, as we've been also mentioning earlier, gives us headroom for future growth potential. Overall, we remain confident of continuing our growth trajectory while extending full support to our customers, suppliers and other valued stakeholders. Industry is gradually opening with a reduction in new cases of COVID-19. As a result, demand scenario is likely to improve going forward. I think with this, we'll be happy to take your questions. Thank you.

Operator

operator
#5

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of [ Naresh Vaswani ] from [ Samita Capital ].

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#6

So congratulations for a good set of numbers this time. First question, on the raw material side, I'm appraising that the costs would have increased during [Audio Gap] so full impact of this higher raw material prices would be reflected in probably Q2 and Q3 as well. So just I wanted to understand realistically how much of this steep rise in raw material prices can we pass it on to our customers? And in the fertilizer segment, these margins, is it high due to the subsidy hike? I mean what would be the normalized range which we can work with in the fertilizer segment?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#7

So as far as the pass-through of raw material prices is concerned, as you know, say, typically 1 quarter, and I would say within 1 quarter also towards the end of the quarter or second half of the quarter, raw material prices hike very sharply. So in short term, it's very difficult to pass on the raw material prices. In fact, some of these -- even the contracts, which have a provision of pass on of raw material prices, typically tend to take the raw material prices of previous months. So as such, in the finished goods, it's difficult to get reflection of raw material prices in such a short time. In longer horizon, and I would say typically, when you look at Y-o-Y numbers in any of the products, you would typically see that if there is Y-o-Y increase has happened and not in a manner that most of the increase happens in a very short time frame, if it has happened over a period of 1 year, typically, the pass on of raw material prices also reflects in the finished good prices. This time, it's been an exceptional case in quarter 1. So we are quite hopeful. And we are seeing that in finished good prices where -- particularly where the prices are also linked with the international prices or import parity. Gradually, the reflection of raw material prices is beginning to show. And to that extent, over next few quarters, we should be in a position to get that pass through, I would say, of our raw material prices. That said, it's also -- right now, it's difficult to predict what happened to raw material prices itself. And to that extent, it's difficult at this stage to put any number to it. But it will be sufficient to note that on such hikes in raw material prices, sharp hikes, typically would take a little bit of a time to pass through. As far as the subsidy part is concerned, see, what happened during the quarter, there are 2, 3 different -- if you look at different sources, one is the subsidy, of course, went up. Particularly, the raw material prices went up. Also, we -- as government has increased the subsidy, food subsidy increased, we also reduced our MRP. So a combination of all of that is what is getting reflected in our numbers. Going forward, given the kind of increase that have happened, industry is also in discussions with government. So while government has increased the P subsidies, the N and K component has also gone up. And then to that extent, our discussions or industries' discussions with the government on the lines of looking at possibility of increased subsidy on the other component is also right and currently underway. So depending on what stand the government takes and what happens to the -- also raw material prices going forward, you would see that impact in coming quarters. The situation is so very dynamic that it is right now difficult to put any number or any trend to it.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#8

So in absolute terms, actually, our EBIT margin -- EBIT number in fertilizer is very good. So I was just wanting to know that is it something which is due to our product mix change and internal cost-saving measures which we are taking in and the operating leverage which we spoke about? And is this something which is sustainable regardless of -- obviously, government is supporting on the raw material price hike as well. But I was just thinking that is it a sustainable increase which has happened due to our internal factors?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#9

It's both. As you see, the volumes have gone up. And as we've been saying that with volumes going up, per tonne margins improved, also the general efficiency at plant as manufacturing efficiencies go up. So there is an impact of that certainly with increase in volumes. There is partly also an impact of a subsidy increase. So it's a combination of both.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#10

Okay. Okay. Sure. And last question. In terms of growth, our capacities are now close to optimal utilization overall, if you see. So how do we plan to grow -- ammonia project is there, obviously. And -- but in each of the segments, if you can briefly explain how will those come in over the next 2 years?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#11

So as far as fertilizer is concerned, we still have headroom not just in bulk, but even the speciality fertilizer, that is the bentonite sulfur segment. So there is some bit of a capacity utilization that is yet to be exploited. Also, as we've been mentioning that with the margins debottlenecking both on the raw material storage and the evacuation site, the NPK capacities can be enhanced from 6 to 8 lakh tonnes. So while -- vis-à-vis 6 lakh tonnes while we are -- our capacity utilizations are now inching up closer to 90% or thereabout, but 8 lakh tonnes, there is that headroom available. So that's without debottlenecking, which is marginal in terms of any CapEx that may be required. So that's as far as fertilizer. And in fertilizer, the other aspect also is that we've -- we are also launching cross-specific formulations [ that we can switch ], which is where, in terms of volume, we would still be restricted by the 8 lakh tonnes, I would say. But that's value enhancement products that we are going to be launching from this rabi season. And that should result in better margins even though volumes may again remain restricted to 8 lakh tonnes. Maybe I'll ask my colleague, Mahesh, also to add a few words to this. Mahesh, would you like to just...

Mahesh Girdhar

executive
#12

Sure. Sure, Amitabh. Sure. Thank you very much for the question, and I will not repeat what Amitabh has said, I'll just give you perspective of the key question here was that how do you see sustenance of the -- such a great financial performance? So I mean, first of all, let's reflect. In the last 7 quarters, we have continuously grown our fertilizer business. It's basically based on our launch of differentiated NPKs, utilization of our capacity. And we also had spare capacity of NP. We also increased our NP share. We also enhanced our speciality business manufactured in [ the credit period ]. What has helped us is that we are actually becoming now a kind of not minor player, but a major player in terms of market share. Like, in this quarter, we should grew our market share by 6 points. In Maharashtra, we went up from 15% to 21%. And so number one, we are able to expand volume. Number two, we have been able to stabilize the growth of our differentiated product based on its value. So this is I see going forward sustainably because this is what we've demonstrated in the last 6, 7 quarters. Going forward, as we already started to mention about our new formulation. So we are going to launch a complete nutrition balanced products going forward coming through in the next couple of months. So we already got approvals. And these products would be launched in some specific crops. They are suited for specific crops better than others. And they would be also completely differentiated unique products in the market. They will help us further enhance value as well as utilization of our plants. And in the same way, even on our speciality side, we have already launched crop-specific products in grapes, in pomegranates, in tomato. So our strategy of going into differentiation and then consumer-based, crop-specific products is actually on the ground. And we are not just talking, we are actually launching those products and are able to scale up. So I can't make any specific comment on the financial outlook, but this is the strategic outlook of the business based on differentiation and based on solution to the crops and based on our working engagement with the consumers. As our chairman already mentioned that we already established a good business model. Even in the COVID period, we are reaching the next performance, we are able to engaged, we are able to demonstrate. So we set up a complete go-to-market strategy and a portfolio strategy well based on these factors that we mentioned. Thank you very much.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#13

And as far as the other segments are concerned, TAN, as you are aware, we are looking for an expansion on the East Coast, 3-lakh 76,000-tonne capacity. As far as IPA is concerned, as of now, there is no plan for expansion. We are working the IPA in the entire environment in terms of what are the sustainability of long-term margins. In acid, we are -- I mean obviously, at this stage, while there is no capacity announced and expansion announced, but there is obviously the demand growth that you are seeing in the nitric acid downstream segment. That definitely opens the opportunity for expansion of nitric acid. We have sufficient sort of land available in the hills to do that. But as of now, we haven't taken any decision, but there are definitely growth opportunities on the nitric acid side given what's happening on the demand.

Operator

operator
#14

[Operator Instructions] Next question is from the line of Nishith Shah from Aequitas.

Nishith Shah

analyst
#15

Congratulations on good set of numbers. Sir, I wanted to understand that -- so I understand that you are debottlenecking in TAN. So what kind of investments are we looking at and what is the time line over there?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#16

No. What I mentioned is the 3-lakh 76,000-tonne capacity and new capacity on the East Coast.

Nishith Shah

analyst
#17

Okay.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#18

And we have, in the past, also given a guidance that we are trying to freeze the CapEx number, but it's likely to be in that INR 1,800 to INR 2,000 range in terms of INR 2,000 crores. That's the range. But the exact numbers are being finalized.

Nishith Shah

analyst
#19

And sir, I was going through the...

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#20

[indiscernible] tonnes. Yes.

Nishith Shah

analyst
#21

Sorry. Sir, go ahead.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#22

Go ahead.

Nishith Shah

analyst
#23

Yes. Sir, so I was going through the annual report. And in that, it states that you have initiated debottlenecking called TAN capacity expansion at Taloja with minimum investment. So I was talking in back records.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#24

Yes. So that is still being studied from a technical standpoint as to what kind of additional capacity it can need and what are the CapEx involved. But there is definitely a prime opportunity -- opportunities to debottleneck Taloja at Deepak.

Nishith Shah

analyst
#25

Okay. And sir, my second question is I wanted to understand that you said this nitric acid shutdown will benefit us. So can you elaborate what kind of benefits are we looking at?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#26

Nitric acid shutdown?

Nishith Shah

analyst
#27

Yes. So going forward, that will help us.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#28

I didn't get -- I didn't make any such statement about shutdown. I'm not clear what -- what are you referring to?

Nishith Shah

analyst
#29

Okay. Sir, so can you help me understand what are the current realizations of nitric acid? Are they trending upwards?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#30

So nitric acid, what has happened is, one is the general trend in terms of what is happening in the Nitroaromatics segment. That is that we are now seeing a lot of these global supply chains showing inclination towards diversifying from China to India. And given we are in Nitroaromatics segment and various speciality chemicals, we are still -- in many of these segments have perhaps 115, 120 across China's capacity. Even a small, I would say, divergence from China could be a significant number on our base. So one trend that we are seeing is that -- with that, you would see expansion coming from existing players, some new players may also -- but then on the existing capacity, the capacity utilizations will go up. And that is resulting in the demand on the nitric acid side. But what has happened in Q1 specifically is that because of even second wave COVID-related restrictions, the phos segment has seen a reduction in demand. Also, what had happened is the other -- some of the other players who are into nitric acid segment, their downstream capacities are where the nitric acid goes. They were also because of COVID-related challenges were not operational. As a result, there was more acid into the market. So an impact of that has been felt in Q1. But directionally speaking, we are -- and I've said that earlier as well that we are seeing that nitric acid remaining short for foreseeable future. In fact, our estimate is that until '24, '25 and even beyond, given what is happening to the demand side and how we are seeing demand shaping up compared to the supplies, this product will remain short. And effect of that should reflect in the realization in the mining.

Operator

operator
#31

The next question is from the line of Lokesh Manik from Vallum Capital.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#32

My first question was a clarification on -- which I required on the fertilizer business, we've seen very good margins. Has there been any impact of lower cost in inventory coming in from last quarter in this quarter?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#33

Yes. That's what I mentioned, that the numbers are a combination of the capacity -- higher capacity utilization, higher volumes.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#34

Right. Right.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#35

And also benefit of subsidies. But like I was also mentioning that there were -- as much as there were subsidies, there was -- also, we reduced the MRPs post the subsidy announcement. And some of the effects of raw material prices has also got reflected. So it's a combination of all these 3, 4 things that's reflecting.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#36

Okay.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#37

But certainly, yes, that's the...

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#38

So going forward, if the raw material prices today are higher, which are -- Common talks about $500, if I'm not mistaken. Would they start reflecting in the second quarter almost in the fertilizer business?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#39

So see, what has happened is, and this is a point I was earlier making, that the government has increased the subsidies in the P segment. Phos has gone up across NPK raw material cycle.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#40

Right.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#41

And at the discussion industry is currently having with the government are also in terms of what would be government's take or response on those increases and is there -- is the government -- would government consider an increase as far as the other nutrients are concerned. So depending on what stand the government takes, the industry will obviously look at passing on the prices of these increased raw materials in the finished goods. So we'll have to see. It's -- I think there are -- it's not just what we do and what industry does, but it's also what government does is the key answer to this question.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#42

Correct. Correct. And Amitabh, can you share the -- what is the inventory or the working capital cycle on an average that we have for different products from TAN to nitric acid, IPA and NP, NPK? On an average, what is the raw material holding period or an inventory holding period that you follow for them?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#43

See, for IPA and -- so there are at least 2 products which have a season involved, which is fertilizer and to an extent even -- and TAN is -- this is -- the second quarter is a lean season because that's the -- during this period. So the working capital cycle also changes quarter-on-quarter for these 2 products. In fact, in fertilizer, we -- like -- I think I already also said that post the lumpy season, you typically are building inventories until monsoon comes. And so therefore, if you see the working capital cycle during that period, it peaks just before June. And then we would get a big chunk of your payment and the numbers -- working capital numbers substantially change for CMB. For the other products, which is IPA and for acid, we typically have 42, 45 days of credit period. And sometimes, we collect faster than those -- particularly in the phos segment, depending on the extent of phos segments, your working capital cycle could be faster than 40 to 45 days.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#44

Understood, Amitabh. Just a small request, Amitabh. If data disclosure can be consistent because this quarter, we are seeing that nitric acid revenue and IPA has been combined. So it -- in last quarter, it was between different industry, nitric acid revenue for the quarter and the IPA revenue for the quarter. In the investor presentation going forward, I mean whatever data you are showing...

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#45

Yes. We can further clarify that. Yes.

Lokesh Manik

analyst
#46

Yes. Because by plugging in data, it's becoming a little difficult than -- because we're following a trend and then suddenly, we see a clumped revenue profile for 2, 3 different products, it's becoming difficult to analyze.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#47

Fair enough. We can clarify that.

Operator

operator
#48

The next question is from the line of Deepak Poddar from Sapphire Capital.

Deepak Poddar

analyst
#49

Sir, I just wanted to understand, you did mention that the pass-through of raw material to the finished good might take maybe over 2 -- next 2 quarters, right? So is that the time period when one should expect your margins to normalize maybe the impact that we have seen this quarter? So -- yes.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#50

So see, I think that it's -- as simple as it may sound, see, one is, of course, the prices -- finished goods prices have to start reflecting -- although the raw material prices increase, they need to start reflecting a definitive cycle. There is also a play of a particular season. So in certain season, in -- ag, for example, is a new season in Q2. Now in Q2, therefore, even though normally, if it was any other period, the reflection of raw material prices in finished goods has been much faster. If you have a lean season where the consumptions are low, it could take a little a little longer. But what -- if you compare Y-o-Y, typically any increase in any of these segments, you would see that -- unless there is a very, very sharp increase in a very short period, you would typically see that as the margins -- [ part-time ] margins kind of remains sort of steady. And that is the point you need to see. Quarter-on-quarter, there would always be these fluctuations. So even last year also, if you see the way the Chemicals segment picked up by the second half. So you can expect that as the demand also goes up in these segments, the pass-through of raw material prices in finished good prices would be far swifter.

Deepak Poddar

analyst
#51

Correct. So sir, by third quarter of -- once you resume, the pass-through should be complete? Like by third quarter, like...

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#52

I can't say complete or otherwise. But yes, by third quarter and fourth quarter, you would see obviously much better sort of pass-through of these raw material prices. But it could be one needs to watch out what happens to raw material prices. And therefore, if raw material prices remain at that level, yes, that's pretty -- that's the point it will get passed on and by third, fourth quarter is a fair statement. But if the prices go down or go up from here, we'll have to see.

Deepak Poddar

analyst
#53

Yes. Yes. That's a fair comment. But do we have any kind of view that how can the raw material prices behave? Or it would be very difficult on your part to give any kind of comment on that?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#54

See, right now, given the sharp increases that have happened, we believe that at least ammonia prices should -- from here on, the run-up on the upper side -- upside should be limited. Phos acid is in general, phos -- I think fertilizer prices globally are going up. And we'll have to see because these prices get fixed quarterly basis. And also typically, it's very -- as far as the suppliers are concerned, there are limited supplies globally. And to that extent, negotiations is -- happens on a, I would say, party-to-party basis or bilateral basis. So to that extent, we'll have to wait and see what happens in Q3 and Q4 on phos acid prices. But the other commodities have run up already. And we hope that from here on, the further run-up on the high side would be limited.

Operator

operator
#55

Next question is from the line of [ Surbhi Sarugwe ] from [ SMI First ] Capital.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#56

Am I audible?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#57

Yes. Go on.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#58

Okay. Sir, my question is that in your press release, you have mentioned that you have received approval for nutrient-based subsidies for crop-specific grades by government. So can you quantify the amount of subsidy? What would be the amount of subsidy?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#59

Mahesh, would you like to answer? This is more about our new product segment.

Mahesh Girdhar

executive
#60

Certainly. Certainly, Amitabh, I can answer that. So see, the subsidy is complex. NPK fertilizer are driven by the NPs. They are declared for NPKs as well as sulfur, micronutrients, which is boron and zinc. So they are the fixed rate. And depending on how much is the use of particular nutrients in a particular product formulation, you can calculate that. So like P has currently the highest subsidy and there is no subsidiary in the same way. There's a fixed subsidy for zinc and boron and no other micronutrient has subsidy. So the formulation which we are doing in the market going forward are mostly micronutrients, which are complete in their contribution. They are providing balances in crops, such as specific crops. So accordingly, there would be provision. So I can't calculate right now, but I think the methodology is based on the NBS, the nutrient-based subsidy.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#61

Okay. Okay, sir. And sir, my another question is that can you quantify how much will be the finished good price increase in the second quarter that would reflect the raw material price increase?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#62

Remember, as I explained...

Mahesh Girdhar

executive
#63

I think -- sorry.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#64

Yes. Go on, Mahesh.

Mahesh Girdhar

executive
#65

Yes. So when it comes to fertilizer, I think Amitabh already explained there the multiple factors are playing role in the pricing. It is raw material, it is inventory of the raw material when the price has changed as well as is there a change in the subsidy on a particular nutrient? As Amitabh already mentioned, certain discussions going on. And accordingly, we decide the MRP of the product and -- which are also driven by the reasonableness clause as the complex industry is governed by certain regulations under NBS policy. So multiple factors are considered when we define our pricing. But generally, I mean when the raw material prices are changing, they're reflecting into the price changes, unless there is an increase in subsidy. So that's how the pricing takes place. So I can't set really a round number because that's a very dynamic pricing.

Operator

operator
#66

Next question is from the line of [ Vishal Prashant ] from [ EP Capital Limited ].

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#67

I have a question related to ammonia CapEx and cost structure. So I was trying to go through the conference call basket for the last call that you have done. So with that, there, you explained very beautifully how the cost structure is, but somehow we got confused. So what you said is if the natural gas is at $220 and conversion at INR 40, so we will make it $260 to $280. And the landed cost, if we are importing from Middle East, is $46, $48. That's what I understood. But if we are trying to import it from Middle East, then our competition in South India, one of the fertilizer company, they said in the last call that FOB of ammonia is $260 to $280. And another part where you said $80 for duty transportation cost. So it comes to be $360 or something. So is there something that I'm missing? If you could help me with that.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#68

See, first is any number that you take of ammonia, whether $260, $280, $300, $350, that only reflects a point in time what the ammonia prices are. Today, for example, ammonia prices are as high as $650 [ eco vis-à-vis ]. So what is -- the way you need to look at this ammonia project is that is it from a cost perspective because we have a choice of buying ammonia or making it here. So in buy versus make decision, what we believe is that making makes sense if you are one of the more competitive cost producers of that commodity on -- at least in the region, if not globally. And that is where I was -- earlier, I had explained this aspect that when ammonia would go through this price, say, from $250 to now $850, it would go up and down. But when we look at our gas prices, it is for today, when we move ammonia from Middle East to our plant, we incur almost $80 to $90 of transportation costs. You translate that into gas, it translates to about $3 of -- $3 per MMBtu of gas price, just from a conversion standpoint. We also have -- as I was mentioning earlier that we have -- government of Maharashtra under their ultra mega project team has given us fiscal incentives where equivalent of the state DSP that is payable on the fertilizer, that, I'd say, DSP portion would be reimbursed to us over a period of 15 to 20 years until we recover 75% of our project cost. That, if you translate again into gas equivalent, translates to roughly about $1.25 to $1.50. So what it means is that by producing this ammonia here, you are savings $4.50 -- roughly $4.50 of gas. Now so long as our -- and our estimate is that even at the current level of increased commodity prices, the landed cost of long-term gas. And one should not confuse with the gas prices that one sees being on the spot segment, which fluctuates quite a lot. But on a long-term basis, if the gas price or the landed price of gas is about $8.50 and if I'm making a saving of $4.50 because of all these factors in ammonia terms, then it's as good as manufacturing this ammonia at a gas price of $4. Now $4, if you -- today, you want to set up a plant -- ammonia plant in Middle East or any plant that is based on natural gas, the transfer pricing of gas that we will get from suppliers there would not be less than $4, which means that this gas is -- this plant is as good as being set up in Middle East as the source of gas, the cheapest perhaps, reasonably speaking, is a bigger source of gas that is available. And if you compare yourself from a construction cost point of view, a capital cost point of view, typically, India on -- from a construction part -- point of view is at least 15% to 20% cheaper than the construction cost in Middle East. And that's the additional, I would say, advantage. So so long as I am convinced that this plant and setting it up in Middle as a source of gas, which is perhaps the most competitive gas source in the region, then it doesn't matter what happens to commodities. I would always remain -- on a long horizon, I would always remain better off making ammonia as opposed to buying ammonia. Now that -- I mean one can take $650 of [ natural gas ] in Middle East and do this calculation, and one would come with huge number in terms of the delta. While if you look at this from a $250 or $280, then that number would obviously look a different number. What -- as a data -- another data point that I must mention here is that in last 10 to 12 years, our purchase of ammonia from Middle has been on an average anywhere between $390 to $400 of FOB in Middle East. That is the price at which we have typically bought ammonia. So you can plug in that number. I mean for the sake of calculation, one can plug in that number. But we also believe that given what is happening globally in terms of carbon emission and hydrogen becoming a fuel of choice, you would see ammonia also becoming a carrier of hydrogen from a trade perspective because hydrogen per se cannot be carried. It's a very highly explosive material. So that commodity cycle of ammonia in next 10 years we believe is going to be different from -- or more inflationary than what it was in 10 years. But one can apply any of these numbers. But I think fundamentally, one should look at it, are you cost competitive regionally? If the answer is yes, you would always be better off making ammonia as opposed to buying it.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#69

Got it. Got it. So let's say, ammonia FOB is $250, then we definitely need to have $90 or $80 of transportation. So that will give me the [ packager's ] price? Or is there anything else that I'm missing?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#70

So I don't know whether I should answer this question because your assumption on $250...

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#71

But just assuming that is $250 and that we can't do anything else?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#72

Yes. So like I said, the data point is we've got ammonia at $400 FOB I believe in the past 10 years. The current prices of ammonia are at $620, $650. Now you apply any number, but if you -- whatever number you take on top of it, you should apply $80 to $90 as something that we would save. We also have a saving of $40 to $45 because of state incentives being granted to us. And there is roughly about $10 to $12 of savings that we get in the team because this ammonia would -- brand would export the [indiscernible], which has a value in terms of it being utilized in our Taloja facility. So you can apply any of those numbers to get that.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#73

Okay. One final question, sir. I was reading your annual report and you mentioned that earlier, INR 2,900 crores we will spend on the ammonia factory. And then it increased to INR 4,100 crores. So what happened? I mean why is there extra $1,200? And I look at the land cost also, it was INR 120 extra for this. So is there something else happening there?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#74

No. INR 2,900 crore was based on an assumption that the existing plant, many of the utilities would be utilized for the same plant. But that is not something that is possible because we were -- we are -- this plant is obviously located at some distance from the current plant. Plus, the current plant doesn't have that kind of utility as a more detailed engineering was done, the current plant utilities are not sufficient for this, number one. Number two, there were a number of other -- whether it is related to environment-related regulations where instead of using the current central effluent treatment plant, we are setting up our own 0-liquid discharge. There were also issues of certain water pipeline, there was issue with water storage, there were issues of power island, separate power island required. So there are a number of factors. But the point remains that at INR 2,900 crore, we were 30% or thereabouts more competitive because we had got this plant at significantly attractive rates. What has happened with the increase in cost is we are now at par with any new plant that will get set up for 0.5 million tonnes. So as such, from a construction cost point of view, we are at par with any plant that would get set up today. A new plant that would get set up today, 0.5 million tonnes. And to that extent, we are not at any disadvantage. If at all, that is an advantage that we had earlier. As to an extent it has been a one-off, land cost obviously is higher than what we had anticipated, and I don't have to explain what happens in land -- even in land procurement. And those factors always come to play when one acquire the land, estimate versus actual.

Operator

operator
#75

The next question is from the line of Madhav Marda from Fidelity International.

Madhav Marda

analyst
#76

I just wanted to understand that for existing products, FY '21 was a good year in terms of margins, in general, across I think many of our categories which showed up in our sort of overall EBITDA margin for the company. Just your outlook for FY '22, if you could give us a qualitative flavor in terms of how the margins can shape us across TAN, IPA, fertilizers and nitric acid, if you could give us some sense versus FY '21, that would be really helpful.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#77

So overall, what is happening in FY '22 versus '21 is, one, fundamentally, in FY '21, we -- our capacity utilization across accepting fertilizer, NPK, by and large, in every other segment, we faced challenges in maintaining our plants, operating our plants from manpower standpoint, from evacuation transportation standpoint. So there is a headroom of capacity utilization that is sitting in our plant as we closed FY '21. And some of it, you are seeing the reflection of that in the Q1 numbers with the exception of IPA. In every other product, the capacity utilizations have gone up. That is number one. Number two, we had certain challenges, operational challenges in the acid where Dahej plant for half of last year was running at low capacity. There were energy inefficiencies, which was corrected by second half, by Q3, Q4. If one were to remove Q1 performance in Dahej where we took a shutdown, a renewal shutdown since we formed it, if you state that both in Taloja and Dahej, our capacity utilizations have gone up. Also, all those anomalies which were there on the cost structure, those have been taken care of. So you will hopefully see better cost efficiencies as far as acid is concerned because their capacity utilizations are better and also some of those energy inefficiency issues have been sorted out. What we also saw from an acid point of view is by -- first half of last year was muted because of the COVID reason. But the whole China plus one kind of -- that the demand side that came in Nitroaromatics segment from the global procurement standpoint, that effect we started seeing from second half. And then this is obviously a post-COVID -- part of it is -- the reason is post-COVID, there are a lot of global supply chains that are diversifying from China. And part of it, we are getting the benefit of it or our downstream segments are getting benefit on that. And that reflected in the demand as far as the acid is concerned. And so we believe, and I was earlier mentioning, that with what has happened to Nitroaromatics segment specifically and the other segment which consume nitric acid, we are seeing -- our estimate is that this product will remain short for a period of time. And that we should get the benefit of that in our phos segment, which would have been the case in the first part of the year last year. Fertilizer, you've seen the capacity utilizations are going up. But equally, I think one factor that has also come into play this year is this sharp increase in raw material pricing. We are hopeful that I think in the second half of this, we would be able to -- or the finished good prices would reflect those increase in raw material prices. And if that happens with the increased capacity utilization and fundamentally demand remaining strong in each one of these products, hopefully, the overall performance should not just sustain, but hopefully do better.

Madhav Marda

analyst
#78

Got it. And sorry, anything on the TAN as well? Like the margins for TAN for this year, any flavor on that?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#79

So TAN, one is fundamentally, the capacity utilization should be better because last year, we closed with more or less 37,000 tonnes, which is roughly about, let's say, 80% -- 87% -- 86%, 87%. In previous years, we have -- when the demand has been there, we have run that plant at 105%, 106%. Quarter 1 capacity utilizations were good, up more than 100%. So if the demand side remains -- and that's despite the fact that in each of our segments, that is coal, limestone and infrastructure, there was an impact of second wave. So we believe that the -- that once the Q2 is out because Q2 is again a lean season for TAN, Q3, Q4 demand should remain strong. And by that time, there is also sufficient time for finished good prices to catch up with raw material price increase. So we believe that like last year, the second half for TAN should be good in terms of volumes as well as margin.

Madhav Marda

analyst
#80

And my last question from my side would be on the time line for the ammonia project. Does the time line remain the same as the last update? Like when do we expect that plant to commission?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#81

Which one are you talking about, the TAN plant?

Madhav Marda

analyst
#82

No. The -- if you could just help with the ammonia and the TAN plant, both of them...

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#83

Ammonia is the -- is Q4 FY '23. That is, let's say, March, April of '23. While TAN is the -- is in FY '24, the second half of FY '24. So the construction is yet to start, but we are getting all the required approvals that are required to start the construction.

Madhav Marda

analyst
#84

And ammonia plant, you haven't [ essentially recovered ] hopefully, so far, right, in terms of the...

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#85

No. No. No.

Madhav Marda

analyst
#86

Okay.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#87

I think we've also --I think somewhere in our quarterly presentation, we've also given certain pictures in terms of the progress that was made on the ground.

Operator

operator
#88

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of [ Manish Jain ] from Moneylife Advisory Service.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#89

My first question is what amount of CapEx...

Operator

operator
#90

The sound is not very clear. May we ask you to speak through the handset?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#91

Sorry. My first question is what amount of CapEx we'll be looking at in the next 2, 3 years? And the second is, what kind of risks are we looking in the near future?

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#92

On CapEx, to your point on risk is related to CapEx you're asking or is that a general inquiry?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#93

No. No. Just in general.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#94

So as far as the CapEx is concerned, we have mentioned that ammonia is -- overall is about INR 4,350-odd crore. We closed the year last year at about INR 1,500 crore. So we have additional -- roughly in both years, roughly about INR 1,350 crores to INR 1,400 crore each in the next 2 years. In TAN, I just mentioned, we have yet to get the exact numbers, but INR 1,800 to INR 2,000 crore is one. Once the construction starts over the next 3 years, about [ $36 a month ]. So that's the way the CapEx would pan out. As far as your question on risk is concerned, so fundamentally, in our business, one is because fertilizer is dependent on monsoon, monsoon remains an uncertainty. Last 2 years and this year also, monsoons have been fairly good. So one has to see it year by year what happens to monsoons. So I think that certainly remains as one uncertainty or risk. The second aspect, I would say, is the nature of our raw materials, particularly on the phos acid and MOP, which are critical raw material for our fertilizer business. In general, the -- from the supply side, it -- it's sort of an oligopoly or a very limited suppliers are there globally because the reserves of these -- the underlying route, I'd say, those are concentrated in certain regions. And therefore, what happens in those regions and -- always when you have suppliers who are limited, there would always be price as well as availability aspects. What we've done from our side is, obviously, we have tried to diversify the sources and minimize the risk, but there is always a risk. That's a risk we believe applies to a great extent to the other fertilizer players also. So that's definitely one area that we have. And the third one, in our case, is we need to implement our projects in time and cost. The good thing is that a large project like ammonia, it's just a construction project now. The entire procurement is -- 95% of procurement is all done. The land is in place, all environmental approvals are in place, other strategy approvals are all in place. So the risk of just the construction is in an overall project implementation risk is a limited risk. And to that extent, we believe that with [indiscernible] as our contracts that he was -- that they have done more than 70% of global ammonia project they're implementing. With that and our capable in-house team, we believe that we have a fairly good hold on that risk. I think that those are the 3 areas that obviously we believe are uncertainties or risks.

Operator

operator
#95

Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll take that as the last question. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Amitabh Bhargava for closing comments.

Amitabh Bhargava

executive
#96

Well, thank you so much, everyone, for your participation. And for any further queries, clarifications, please do get in touch with our investor relationship team. Deepak Balwani is there. And we keep looking forward to your support in our future endeavors. Thank you so much and have a safe time. Thank you so much.

Abhijit Akella

analyst
#97

Thank you very much. On behalf of IIFL Securities Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Deepak Fertilisers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Deepak Fertilisers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.