Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. (DNTL) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
September 13, 2022
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Unknown Analyst
analystAll right. Let's get started. Welcome, everyone, to the 20th Annual Morgan Stanley Healthcare Conference. Thank you all for coming. Before we kick off, I want to read the research disclosure. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/researchdisclosure. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. Thank you for coming. I'm joined by Graham Rosenberg, CEO of dentalcorp; and Nate Tchaplia, CFO of dentalcorp. Why don't I pass it over to quick introductory comments?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveGreat. Appreciate it. Good to be here. Thanks for having us. dentalcorp is just on 11 years old. We are the largest player in the Canadian dental industry, which is an $18 billion industry that is -- still remains ripe for consolidation with only approximately 6% of practices having been consolidated. We are larger than our next 5-plus competitors combined. We're close to double the size of our largest competitor. We completed our second quarter with 525 locations, generating approximately $1.4 billion of revenue and $150 million of EBITDA, and that's on an IFRS basis, about $210 million on a GAAP basis, giving a full year effect to acquisitions. We've generated double-digit growth every year in our history, and we have a growth algorithm that we believe will continue to allow us to drive double-digit growth in all material respects on revenue, EBITDA, and most importantly to us, free cash flow per share. That comes via organic growth of 3% to 4% plus on a sustaining basis, margin expansion of 25 to 50 basis points per annum over the medium term. Combined with a very robust acquisition program, which continues to bear fruit on a quarterly basis, highly predictable is our growth algorithm and we believe we will double and then triple over the next 4 to 7 years as we continue to execute on that plan.
Unknown Analyst
analystThat's great and great growth. I think where I want to start is more on the macro side to kind of lean in there a little -- this environment and the dental sector as a whole. Can you talk a little bit about the macro side of it, this recessionary -- if we are heading into recessionary period or a period of high inflation, it almost feels like you're immune to some of that in the technology to some intermediation. Can you just talk a little bit on that?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveYes, absolutely. Look, over the last 40-plus years, dentistry has outperformed in all cycles. It's outperformed GDP in a -- or CPI, should I say, in inflationary pairs by about 400 basis points. It's proven to be a positive grower in recessionary environments as well. Underpinning that is the high dental IQ of Canadians, about 85% of Canadian adults visited dentists at least once a year. That combined with a strong focus on oral health. Canadians have the highest dental IQ on the planet pretty much compliance around oral health. Those repetitive visits on the hygiene side of things are really making their business such resilient through all economic cycles. We continue to see that today. Second quarter was 3.5% plus of same-store comps driven by a combination of price and volume. We also have a very strong in-sourcing agenda. So in the event that there is a possible drop off, people are concerned about. We don't share those concerns, but a drop-off in discretionary services. The fact that we're actually providing more services than we ever have in terms of aesthetic procedures in design treatments and also implants, we think, positions us really nicely going through whatever the cycle may hold.
Unknown Analyst
analystCan we spend a minute on the competitive landscape as a whole? There was a big deal that just announced in the Canadian landscape, maybe a second on that? And then also just your perspective on big incumbents, new entrants into that market, how you kind of see that shaping out?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveLook, KKR, Canadian dental players, ourselves included, we're probably the first to bring private equity into the Canadian market back in our second year of existence. So that was 2014. L Catterton, which is a large consumer-focused private equity shop out of Connecticut invested in us in 2018. Our next 2 largest competitors, which combined did a deal with KKR and we think that, that brings validation to the dental industry in Canada. We think we're a unique opportunity to participate in dental, as many of you may know, dental in the U.S. and North America, even globally is primarily private equity owned, and so you have an opportunity to participate in a public vehicle, which is otherwise owned by private equity. That transaction -- those 2 businesses have been in business 40 plus years. We've been in business about 11 years. We're close to double this size on an EBITDA basis and revenue basis combined. And we obviously know those 2 players very well. We've chosen a path to put our heads down and continue to execute on what has made us successful over the last 11-plus years and what we believe will make us successful over the next 10-plus years is continuing to execute on single and double acquisition locations. Sometimes multi-site locations more than that, sometimes 10 or 15 locations in the transaction, but doing deals our way with our structure, with our playbook for growth, our integration technology and backlog to drive that.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveI want to follow up on that point...
Graham Rosenberg
executiveDo you want to add on anything?
Nate Tchaplia
executiveYes. So I think from a competitive landscape perspective, we view it positively as well. It's gone from 3 competitors to now 2. And more interestingly is again, these 3 players, as they announced it, have been around for 30-plus years. They have their own cultures. They have their own way of approaching the market. And bringing this together through an integration process, which is going to take significant time, that's now created confusion in the market for the dentists that are looking for that partner to support their next 20 years of operations. The average age of a partner, a dentist that's joining our network is in their mid-40s and now being approached by this now newly combined entity, there's 5 CEOs there. There's 3 different ways of operating, and albeit they're getting a significant purchase price upfront. They're still continuing in their careers for 20-plus years. And that assurance as to the stability of their partner, the culture of their partner isn't there today. And that's really allowed us to continue to build and flourish our pipeline to a significant degree.
Unknown Analyst
analystI want to follow up on the M&A point. In this rising interest rate environment, I got to think that's having an impact on valuations for some of these tuck-in acquisitions that you're making. How do you see that playing out? And can you talk a little bit more on the white space within that market?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveYes. Look, we think that the backdrop of higher rates should be constructed over on valuation in terms of reducing headline valuations. Remember, the majority of practices that trade hands in the Canadian market and here too is from one dentist to another. And typically, a purchasing dentist as typically an associated in a practice will buy from the incumbent dentists using leverage. So we think that, that the higher rates obviously have a cooling effect. As it relates to our business, we have such strong free cash flow. Our free cash flow per share continue to grow in Q2 by, I think, 25% to 30% plus. It's not a material impact at the end of the day. And we feel good about participating in the market and continuing to acquire over the next 18 to 24 months.
Unknown Analyst
analystWhen you think about new acquisitions, the integration of these newly acquired businesses, you've got dc engage, hellodent, specialty service mix you touched on earlier, like Envista, Align, can you talk about how that integration works and how that layers in?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveYes.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveYes, absolutely. So if we start from really the signing of the LOI, what's allowed us to really scale our acquisitions, and we completed 70 practice location integrations in the first 6 months of the year is that process is contiguous with our closing process from LOI to funding. Generally 45 to 60 days, whereby we're able to work with the vendor and their teams to educate them on our platforms like dc engage, like DC market and hellodent, such that on day 1 of closing, they're fully apprised as to our operating model. They understand how to correspond with our technologies, which ultimately allows us to drive that value they want. They're now ordering all their supplies day 1 through DC market where they're able to avail themselves of 35,000 SKUs of prenegotiated contracts with all the major suppliers, both north and south of the border. And really drive, again, and avail themselves of all that we are to offer. If we fast-forward then 6 to 12 months, that's really when we start working with them on marketing best practices. And bringing their teams into the education process around our in-sourcing initiative, specifically driving our orthodontic acceleration program through our partnership with Align as well as our new implant and sourcing program with Envista and mainly Nobel, which allows us, again, not only to help them drive efficiencies on the cost side of things, but also to really drive and supercharge that organic growth.
Graham Rosenberg
executiveAnd I just want to overlay that as they say day 1, we're able to immediately derive cost savings, such that within 6 months. We see margin expansion of anywhere between 5% and 15%. Primarily through cost savings on the supply side and some labor efficiencies, we're able to garner by applying our technology stack to the back office of that practice and relieving some labor inefficiencies. And then into the broader in-sourcing agenda, marketing agenda, talent agenda, which drives that sustained 3% to 4% plus same-store comps.
Unknown Analyst
analystAnd hitting on that same-store growth point, I will shift to growth as a whole, primarily, I guess, on organic growth. When you talk about this 3% medium term kind of overall organic growth profile, what levers do you have at your disposal to achieve that?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveRight. So it's everything from price to driving volume of visits, which is generally underpinned by net patient growth, but also driving frequency of visits through optimizing hygiene programs, optimizing recall and leveraging our technology stack to get patients coming back more often on a sustained basis.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveAnd just to build on the frequency side, you mentioned dc engage, which is our proprietary tool, which is technology-driven to bring our existing patients back more often and hellodent really allows us to get the network advantage and ensure that patients, if they are switching a dentist because the largest attrition that happens is a patient either moves where they live or where they work, and that's where they seek a new dentist. But they love their experience in network and they're able to find that new dentist that is either if they're in Toronto, they're moving to Calgary, they're going to find a new dentist in network, which ultimately allows us to keep that patient and minimize that attrition. From a frequency perspective, when we partner with a clinic, on average, a patient comes to the dentist 2.1x on an annual basis. And what's important to note here is the dental clinician is probably the most frequently visited health practitioner that any one of us sees on an annual basis. You're not going to your doctor 2-plus times a year. Hopefully not. And we're able to drive that forward from 2.1% to 2.4%, which is a 25% increase through our engagement tools and technology.
Unknown Analyst
analystShifting over to the cost side and the operating leverage you have there. You referenced a 75% to 80% practice level variable cost [ structure ]. The variability of that is interesting to me and those levers you have to pull, can you spend a little bit of time on that?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveYes.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveSo if you look at our revenue and what's driven or what drives our revenue, there's really 2 main drivers. One is the dentist revenue and one is the hygiene drivers. Dentists, by and large, and that's 70% of our total revenue, are paid on a commission basis. And that's not unique to dentalcorp, that's a standard across the dental industry in Canada, which is roughly 40% of their personal net collections. That, by and large, there immediately now. The largest portion of our provider cost is a percentage. So irrespective of what's happening on the revenue line, we're not protected from that front. Same on the hygiene side. These are all hourly workers depending on the volume throughput in the practice given our scheduling and labor and employment methodologies, we're able to flex based upon, again, the amount of hygiene volumes in the practice. So our total cost of goods that sits in that line item is fully variable. Then as we go down further, our consumable costs are directly correlated to the volume of business. And volume of procedures that are being put through the practice. And if you really distill it down, the only real fixed cost that's in the practice, is truly that administrative team, which is a very small portion as well as the fixed real estate costs of operations. Everything else is truly variable in nature.
Unknown Analyst
analystWhen you think about revenue and particularly, revenue visibility, you've got 85% recurring revenue -- or patient visits is what you publicly announced. To me, that's day 1, you've got a high line of sight into about 85% of your revenue stream day 1 at the start of every year. Can you talk a little bit about that, how that helps you from a forecasting perspective when you think about expansion? Anything on that?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveSo look, it really helps in terms of trying to quantify how we drive and now that we need to push and pull to get to that 3% to 4% plus same-store comps, 85% recurring. We know the plug number of people that -- in that 85% that our move is how we recaptured and the cost due to that. And then it's simply an exercise in applying marketing ROIs and cost of acquisition to plug the gap to get back to 104%, not only through acquiring new patients, net new patients to the network, but also increasing the frequency of visit of those 85%. To Nate's point, it shouldn't be -- we shouldn't cross over. It is -- when we buy a practice, average practice, as their patients visiting them, 2.2x, we're able to increase that between 2.4x and 2.5x. Like that's a significant increase in frequency of visit, which offsets any fluctuations in gross headline patient numbers. So we've got visibility. We know how to plug the gap, we know how to go and acquire from a marketing perspective, new patients and then it just becomes frequency in a bit of price and mix.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveYes. And I'd just go to say that 85% is just patients that visited us in that last 12 months. There's also patients if you look at our total patient chart count across our network, it's significantly larger than that 12-month patient. So you have those that came 18 months ago, and they only come when there's a toothache or something along those lines. And they continue to maintain that relationship with their dentists. So that gap of real true predictability and line of sight is actually much greater than that 85%.
Unknown Analyst
analystImpressive. When you think about total addressable market kind of coming back to the market expansion opportunity, when you think about verticals, new markets, can you spend a little time on that of areas of focus when you think -- I'm sure you have your hands pretty busy right now in the Canadian market. But when you think about other areas on that.
Graham Rosenberg
executiveSo look, it's -- we speak about vertical expansion into other private pay health care sectors in the Canadian context. We also talk about U.S. expansion potentially down the road. But what we continue to reinforce is the fact that the macro opportunity for us in the Canadian market is to acquire $40 million plus of EBITDA on an annual basis. That's on a GAAP basis and continue to grow the business, expand margins, both through the variability of cost at the prices level but also our corporate infrastructure, which is substantially built out and the incremental costs are truly now incremental and at a lower rate of reinvestment than the rate of growth in revenues. That's where we get our margin expansion in that top rate and that's where we're going to focus and double and triple our business over the next 4 to 7 years. And then private pay health care verticals to the extent that we believe it drives a better patient journey and better patient experience and higher patient retention and more share of private pay health care dollars, we will look at transactions. And we've looked at several. We've passed on all of them. We're pretty rigorous around that analysis and that work. And again, nothing will detract from our execution of the Canadian dental play over the next 4 to 7 years plus.
Unknown Analyst
analystThanks for that. I want to ask on leverage. Debt plays a big piece. I'd imagine in some of the acquisition story here and your long-term leverage kind of thought process there. How should we think about it from a capital allocation perspective of your uses of your cash flow?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveYes. So look, our base business today, if we did no acquisitions, we're delevered to a 1 handle of leverage of debt to EBITDA in the next 36 months. Like we've run those numbers 6 ways to Sunday, and that is -- that's the math. We've made decisions to obviously reinvest that capital, that free cash flow into our M&A agenda. If you look at the business today, about 40% and change and growing. And over the next 3 years, we will achieve cash flow self-sufficiency, just as we said we were [ at tale ] of IPO. About 40% of our acquisition cost is funded from that free cash flow. 40% from incremental debt borrowings, but not necessarily incremental leverage per se. And then 20% from the issuance of equity to dentist, but as a financing tool, but most importantly, to align them with the overall growth of dentalcorp and drive some retention. So that's the playbook. In 3 years from now, about 60% to 80% will come from free cash flow, bounce from equity, and a little bit from incremental borrowings, but not leverage. And the business, as we see it, should delever to something with a high to leverage handle on it in the next 36 months. And for a business which is so highly resilient, that's been proven over the last 11 years with high margins. We think that is a reasonable level of leverage and playbook to execute on, again, consistent with when we went public over the next 36 months.
Unknown Analyst
analystShifting back to acquisitions. When you think about an acquisition target that gets you excited, I'm just trying to think of kind of what does the typical acquisition look like? And I'm more on the smaller end, the 1% to 3% or kind of the mid-level, is kind of where I'm leaning toward. How many locations? What's the average age of that dentist? What's their experience level? What's the size of that practice? Just when you think about it combing the landscape, what kind of makes you dig in?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveTo our target. I'll let Nate expand on it because he runs M&A, but -- and has for the last 8 years...
Nate Tchaplia
executive[indiscernible]
Graham Rosenberg
executiveLook, the headline is it remains consistent with where we were 10 years ago, it's at least 2 dentists in each practice, so we can deal with succession risk when something happens to one of the other dentists. $2.2 million to $2.3 million of revenue, 20% to 22% EBITDA margins in a good location with a good reputation and one that we can support in growing [indiscernible] that we spoke about earlier. So that's how bread and butter. We don't vary a lot from it. I'd say less than 5% of our locations have only 1 dentist in it, and that's primarily because they belong to a group but no group or individual location on its own has less than 2 dentists. So we really focus on making sure that we have stability in that revenue base, a good hygiene program that we can then optimize, and that's our bread and butter. We'll go into most locations, most towns and cities in Canada. But we weren't going to very rural areas where attracting talent is going to be a problem. So those practices are actually more profitable, lower costs, lower imports, and particularly on the labor side and on the rent side. But if it's a dentist retirement, you can't replace them.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveI think that covers it from what our target is, but I think it would be important just to stop here and talk about what our acquisition structure is and how we approach the market. And sometimes the word partnership can get confusing. We do own 100% of every practice within the network. And what's allowed us to scale our acquisitions is really the consistency in which we approach our structure. And frankly, since day 1 when the business was founded until today, that structure has been one and the same. That purchase price that we do pay for the practice is a combination of both cash and equity in dentalcorp. And that's roughly 70% to 80% in cash and 20% to 30% in dentalcorp equity. And the vending dentist does have to hold a meaningful portion of that equity through the duration of their term. And those terms that they do sign on with us are 5 to 7 years. And again, they're joining us in their mid-40s. So that 5 to 7 years, our renewal rate after that initial term does expire is 96%. So they continue on for many, many years with us. From an alignment perspective, they're aligned with topical through that ownership and equity, but they're also aligned in the 4 walls of their practice. Above the underwritten EBITDA. So again, average practice is doing, call it, $2.2 million, $2.3 million of revenue, $400,000 of EBITDA. Above that $400,000, they're going to earn 20% of that growth. So in the following years that the practice is doing $600,000 of EBITDA, they're getting 20% of that incremental growth, and that continues through the duration of the relationship. What's important to note as well is on the downside, that first 10% of decline in performance, they would be responsible for that. So in the following years, the practice only does $460,000 -- $360,000 of EBITDA, their compensation would be adjusted in the following years. So they're aligned -- in the overall topical, they're aligned to the growth and they're aligned to the downside. And that's where the partnership comes into play.
Unknown Analyst
analystThanks for that. We've only got a couple of minutes left. If anyone has questions in the audience, we have a microphone. If you could just raise your hand. I think we have a question.
Unknown Analyst
analystJust a question on the in-sourcing. So you bring in aligners or implants to a practice, how profitable are those procedures and what uplift do they provide to the bottom line as the practice starts to perform them under dentalcorp?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveRight. So the incremental margins are somewhere between 25% and 30% fully loaded cost wise. But remember, it's on a bigger dollar item, right? So an implant is a $2,000 to $3,000 item, an Invisalign treatment is $5,500 to $6,500 item. So for dentists that has some incremental hours or time in a day or extra days to allocate, the flow-through is very strong on a dollar basis. Margins isn't going to move the needle much at the practice level.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveNo, absolutely. And important to note again, our practices are far from anywhere close to capacity both from a full utilization of operatories and hours perspective. So as we're bringing in more services, it's to those existing patients, there's a significant amount of capacity in order to be able to service them.
Unknown Analyst
analystI guess a question from me. Can we spend a minute on the current labor inflationary environment, what you're seeing out there? Is there anything you've been able to do from a staffing perspective or automation perspective that makes you help navigate this environment that we're in right now?
Graham Rosenberg
executiveSo maybe I'll add more color, but we talked about a network effect and at the beginning of all this I said to myself, like, oh, what's the benefit of throwing a whole bunch of practices together, right? So the network effect is on the patient side in terms of being able to deliver a network solution to patients as they move around the country. We spoke about that earlier. And then the same thing applies on the labor side. So we're starting to garner efficiencies in the labor market, which is tight, around being able to use staff and move them around from one practice to another. So a lot of the time, there'll be for example, a hygienist who wants 4 days of work, but in the practice that they've been working, there's only 3 days available, they put up their hand and we're able to transport them somewhere else. Dentists alike and associate dentists may be working 3 days a week and want to buy practices 2 days a week, somewhere else out of the network, we're able to bring them into network. So we're starting to see the benefit of that network effect on labor -- on the labor side, which obviously drive efficiencies.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveYes. I think if we look at the overall dynamic, again, labor is a small portion of the total cost structure in the dental practice. And on an annual basis, ultimately, as the business grows from both the frequency as well as price, even if labor on a hygienist goes up by 5%, they represent a small portion of the total cost basis. As we grow the top line, it becomes less and less meaningful. So ultimately, the drop-through is still quite positive despite some of the increases. Again, we're not insulated from it. But given our ability to provide them with a very positive experience to be able to optimize our schedules and ensure that they're well supported, we haven't felt that same impact as an individual practice does because there is a vacancy on a hygienist or a vacancy on an assistant. They don't have a practice of dentistry that they can share those staff with. So both from a planning perspective as well as through an economic perspective, we've been rather insulated.
Unknown Analyst
analystI want to talk a little bit repeatability when you think about acquiring a practice, what it kind of looks like from LOI to integration? What are some of the incremental things you can do to drive volume from a cost structure perspective, anything from a margin perspective, that general playbook if you could suss that out a little.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveYes. So I think from signing of an LOI to closing, we have an integration team that's going to work directly with the practice and ensure that they're able to access again all of the trainings on how to order, all of the trainings on how to schedule and work with the staff and avail themselves of all the support that's within the network. Going back to the example on consumables and driving those cost synergies. If we come back to consumables alone, a practice on average, operated independently is going to be running somewhere in the neighborhood of 7% to 7.5% as a percentage of total revenue as their cost of consumables. In our network, it's going to be approximately 5.7%. So purely as a result of availing themselves of DC market, which again is our proprietary ordering platform. Day 1, there's that 140, 150 basis point margin expansion that starts coming through the numbers immediately. And that's not factoring in office expense, cost savings, janitorial cost savings and so forth. And that's really in that first year where you're able to drive that 10% to 15% plus margin expansion. And again, on an average margin of, call it, 20% to 22%, purely that 150 basis points of expansion drives that alone. So significant opportunity on the cost side. And when you overlay the supercharging of the organic growth through the in-sourcing, that's where we're able to drive even further in that 24-month outlook.
Unknown Analyst
analystWell, we are out of time. Thank you both for coming today.
Graham Rosenberg
executiveI appreciate it.
Nate Tchaplia
executiveThanks for having us.
Graham Rosenberg
executiveThanks.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Dentalcorp Holdings Ltd. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.