Element Solutions Inc (ESI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
November 11, 2020
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Neel Kumar
analystHi, everybody. Thank you all for joining. Next up we have Elements Solutions with us. And with us from the company is Ben Gliklich, CEO. So we'll start off with some Q&A and we'll see if the audience has any questions. [Operator Instructions] So before we begin, I just need to read a disclaimer. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley recent disclosure website at www.morganstanley.com/disclosure. If you have any questions, please reach out to Morgan Stanley [indiscernible]. Ben, do you want to kick it off with some opening comments?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes, absolutely. Thank you, Neel. Thank you, Morgan Stanley for hosting. Happy to be here and just spend some time with you. For those who are new to the company, Element Solutions is a global diversified company that provides chemical technology to enable performance. Sales are about $1.8 billion. We're split 30% in each of the Americas and Europe and 40% in Asia, and our 4,500 people are spread similarly around the world. Our workforce is heavily weighted towards sales and innovation as our business relies heavily on on-premise solution selling and technical service. I specified earlier and we specified that we provide chemical technologies. This is not a materials company, we are a solutions provider, and our solutions enable breakthrough technologies in electronics, in automotive and in other end markets. The materials that we do provide are made in relatively simple manufacturing processes, and so our business has light capital requirements. And all of this together translates to sticky, high-margin sales and stable, strong cash flows, return on tangible assets, which is something we measure ourselves on in industry leading. We are a market leader in attractive niche markets. They are attractive because the profit pools are attractive, the barriers to entry are high and they're growth markets. These are markets that are being supported by compelling long-term secular trends like 5G, vehicle electrification, proliferation of advanced computing power into a myriad of new markets. And we're just beginning to see the impact of these trends on our P&L, and we're enthusiastic about the growth that these trends will bring in the years to come. I'll end my summary there. I'm sure Neel will ask plenty of questions about all of what I just said. So let me turn it to him, and I'm looking forward to your questions.
Neel Kumar
analystOkay. Sound good. So maybe to start off, I mean, despite the challenging organic growth environment this year, you've been able to largely maintain your margins year-to-date. Can you just talk about how you've been able to accomplish this? Is this because of the variable cost base with the business model, and what specific cost actions have you taken? And how should we think about the cost base?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So the 2 hallmarks of our business are the sustainability of our margins and the sustainability of our cash flows. This is a business, as I went through, has a highly technical and sales and innovation-oriented workforce. So the operating cost in this business are very, very variable. The gross margins are sticky and high. They're not determined to the extent that many chemical companies, margins are determined by utilization of the plant. The gross margins are high. The fixed assets are low. And so operating -- the variable operating costs are really people costs. And so when we're in a challenging market environment, we're able to significantly flex down our OpEx. We're not paying the same level of incentive compensation when the business isn't growing for salespeople or for innovation people or functional people that support our footprint around the world. We're not traveling. This year is an exceptional case of reduction in travel. But as I said earlier, on-premise solution selling requires a significant amount of travel. We've been able to overcome that and continue to sell products and close new deals in this more remote and virtual world this year, but travel is down very dramatically. With some government subsidies, we took some salary actions and some furloughs in instances. Importantly, we have not cut headcount. This is a people-based business. There is a huge amount of technical capability learned on the job and workforce, and we've preserved employment. We don't cut to the extent that it damages the long-term growth trajectory of the business. So in the second quarter, OpEx was down 16% year-over-year without firing people. Some of us took salary cuts, but we've actually rolled those all back by now and same with furloughs. So we've really demonstrated our ability to flex down OpEx without damaging the long-term trajectory of the business. R&D spend has been flat on a dollar basis for 7 quarters.
Neel Kumar
analystOkay. And then when you think about going into next year, how many of those temporary cost savings in reverse? How do you think about the cost savings?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So since we became Element Solutions, we talked about operational excellence and prudent capital allocation. Operational excellence is running these excellent businesses better. We've got a great portfolio of businesses, and we have an opportunity to run them more efficiently. So we took out $25 million of cost in 2019. We've taken out another $8 million, $10 million of cost this year. There will be some build back in OpEx. We saw that in the third quarter to an exaggerated extent, and the reason I say to an exaggerated extent is because the pace of the recovery certainly was greater than our expectations. And so we had some compensation accruals that took our OpEx up by, I call it, an extraordinary amount of $10 million. Extraordinary because that wasn't cost that normally would have been incurred in the quarter. It was an accrual cash up, which cost will be taken out earlier in the year that ran in the P&L this quarter. So our run rate in the third quarter was above what it should be entering next year. So there will be a modest OpEx build back, but we shouldn't see that erode our ability to grow EBITDA. We may not have the same level of operating leverage that we expect 1.5 to 2.0x sales, but we shouldn't be growing EBITDA any more slowly than we're growing the topline as we look into next year as a baseline.
Neel Kumar
analystThat's helpful. And you mentioned earlier, another kind of key component of your business model here is free cash flow generation. And your free cash flow is expected to grow year-over-year. Based on your guidance, I believe you are targeting free cash flow conversion in terms of EBITDA of about 55% this year. Is that a reasonable level of EBITDA going forward? Or is there an opportunity because that ratio is higher?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So rightly -- as you're rightly pointing out, the second hallmark is very strong cash flow generation. This is a business that doesn't require significant CapEx to sustain margin or to grow. We've got 35 facilities around the world, all running one shift. There is significant capacity to support growth -- volume growth without incremental material CapEx. And our facilities are not expensive facilities in so far as the context of the chemicals industry. We struggle to spend the $30 million of CapEx we guide to every year. And this year, we've had exceptional cash flow conversion because we freed up working capital, right? So while we've had a macro headwind that's impacted the topline, it's been offset by working capital release, and so cash flow has been exceptional. But it will remain strong in good times and more challenging times. We have done things that are built in that will support cash flow growth into next year. So from a balance sheet perspective, we've improved our cost of debt by $16 million. We'll get about a $10 million benefit next year because of the timing to free cash flow. Similarly, from a tax perspective, we've done some incremental tax rate improvement activities, and so we'll see better conversion of pretax profit to net income, and that will also support cash flow growth as well. Using a percentage of EBITDA is a little tricky because it depends on the direction of EBITDA, and how much of our growth is going to go into working capital. There is -- it's a business that runs low 20 percentage points of sales and working capital. So as we grow and we fully expect to grow next year coming off of the cyclical trough and driven by the secular trends supporting the business, we will invest in working capital. But we've got line of sight to material cash flow improvement next year as well.
Neel Kumar
analystOkay. And then maybe just drilling into the segments now. In Electronics, can you just break down how the business is organized? How growth trends have evolved throughout the year for your subsegment?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes, absolutely. So our Electronics business is about 60% of sales. And within Electronics, we've got 3 vertical. We've got the Assembly Solutions business, our Circuitry Solutions business and our Semiconductor Solutions business. The Assembly Solutions business is about 15% of sales, but a large portion of those sales are metal pass-through at low to no margins. So from a sort of contribution perspective, Assembly and Circuitry are about equal size and Semiconductor is a little bit smaller. We characterize the Circuitry business and the Semiconductor business as our high-end Electronics businesses because they're really focused on leading edge. So from a Circuitry standpoint, that's mobile phones, next-generation internet infrastructure, data storage and the semiconductor industry clearly is on the high end of the electronics spectrum. Those businesses define economic gravity this year. We had clearly a massive macroeconomic dislocation in the second quarter in these businesses. We're incredibly resilient and have grown year-over-year. The Semiconductor business has grown 20% year-to-date, and that supports our conviction in the secular growth driving those portions of the business. And we're just in the early innings of those demand drivers, 5G internet infrastructure or 5G wireless infrastructure and new generations of smartphones. The smartphone market is going to be down this year, yet our Circuitry business is going to grow. And then the Assembly business is more broad within its exposure across electronics. It has a high-end -- very high-end applications in electric vehicles and in smartphones, but it also has more consumer electronics exposure. And so it saw a big let down associated with COVID in the second quarter when automotive OEMs were shut down and other manufacturing facilities were shut down. And it recovered very robustly into the third quarter and that momentum has persisted into the fourth.
Neel Kumar
analystAnd then just in terms of 5G, when you think about your Electronics growth this year, is there a way to quantify how does that has been driven by 5G related benefit? And then just going forward, how much an uplift you expect 5G?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So it's a difficult exercise because line of sight to where every printed circuit board fab is sending their boards to is a challenge, right? And so you've got certain fabs that are making boards for not just multiple OEMs, but multiple end markets. So I can't give you a precise number as the contribution from 5G, but I think that it's material, particularly from a base station perspective. And as I said before, mobile phone units are forecast to be down 10% to 15% this year. 5G penetration of those mobile phone units is still pretty modest. And our content on a 5G phone is 15-or-so percent greater than in the normal phone. So I think that you can see an offset there, right, but only a modest offset relative to the percentage of phones that are 5G. The business has been sustained this year also because of data storage and demand for greater connectivity associated with work from home. So it's an uncertain answer, but clearly, the results demonstrate the significant investment we're seeing in higher-end electronics.
Neel Kumar
analystAnd then another secular driver for the business is electrical vehicles. Can you just shed some light, why the company is well positioned to benefit from growth there? Can you just quantify also how much more electric content goes into electric vehicles versus the [indiscernible] vehicle?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So in the opening, I talked about our business, providing enabling technologies, right? We provide technology that enables performance, and we have some technologies that are really critical to enabling the performance of high-end electric vehicles. In particular, we've got products that go into power electronics associated with the inversion, power from the battery to the car. And these are benchmark performing products that are in every high-end EV on the road. And so that's one example of high-value, high-margin technology that we're providing, that's enabling the reliability and performance of electric vehicles. Similarly, electric vehicles have far more electronic content, and that electronic content comes with very rigorous technical requirements and performance standards. We're in a great position to win more than our fair share of that business. We're known to the OEMs. We're well-known to the OEMs from our presence in the industrial side of the business. And our capabilities from circuit board formation or circuit formation through to electronics hardware assembly are unique in that no one else brings to bear with those 2 capabilities, and so our ability to generate collateral that shows the performance when you're talking about life or death applications with increasing advanced driver versus systems. We should win more than our fair share of that high-value content. As a rule of thumb, we think we have 1.5 to 2.0x the value in an EV as we do in an internal combustion car. Another driver of that is simply weight goes from being a convenience to existential when you get to EPS, right? Heavier cars have less endurance, right? They've got less performance. They can go fewer miles. And so taking weight out is increasingly critical in EVs and power plating on plastic technology is one way that EVs have tried to do so. And so more decorative plating is something that you would expect in electric vehicles. Similarly, taking weight out for cabling and glass and moving that into films where you may have circuitry on those films is an application that we've been developing to support OEMs' desire to take away out of cars, and there is a lot of value in that for us and potential.
Neel Kumar
analystAnd then recently, you made an acquisition of Kester. So I'm just curious how's that performed relative to activations? And what has the business been growing at organic environment?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So a great acquisition we made last year. We bought it well. And so we paid a mid-single-digit multiple, mid- to high-single-digit multiple for that business. It fits squarely within what we do today. Most of the sales were in the assembly space. A small portion of the sales were in the semiconductor space. We split the business into those 2 segments. The assembly space has had a tough year. We talked about the second quarter headwinds, and the Kester business was not immune to that. If anything, it was more weighted towards automotive and the balance of the business. The semiconductor business has had an exceptional year. And what Kester did from a semiconductor standpoint, is value-added, they have thermal interface materials, which were used in effectively heat disposal, right? Advanced chips generate a lot of heat and dealing with that heat is a big struggle for electronics hardware, and they've got applications in that market. And that business has flourished under our ownership, being a part of some -- of a company that has a better footprint or bigger footprint in semiconductors have benefited that business. So from a topline perspective, it's been a strong contributor to growth in the semiconductor space. At the same time, the integration has gone exceptionally well. And we are well on track to generate several million dollars of synergies from that integration, blending the multiple down to a low single-digit multiple for that purchase price. So case study for the types of acquisitions that you should expect from us makes sense within our portfolio available at a reasonable multiple, better inside of our portfolio than outside of it, and we're really happy with the results.
Neel Kumar
analystThat's good to hear. And then just in general, how would you characterize the competitive landscape within the Electronics space? It seems like you have some overlap with Atotech's [indiscernible]. Can you just talk about some similarities and differences in your business model versus their's, kind of where specifically you compete?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes. So Atotech is a portfolio company in Carlyle Group. They filed an S1b to go public earlier this year. And then again, recently, a great company and one that we're excited for their public offering because having 2 voices talking about the quality of our business, these are niche markets and more leaders, right? We and Atotech are leaders in the Circuitry Solutions market, in the Industrial Solutions market, they call it general metal finishing. They don't have the Assembly Solutions business that we have. They don't have the graphics business. They don't have the semi business that we have or the offshore business. So it's a little bit of an apple and an orange to compare operating metrics and so forth. The big -- I'd point out a couple of differences between ourselves and Atotech. First, we have this Assembly business that sells metal on a passive basis, and so that is a burden on our margins on a relative basis. But we see a lot of value in having that business because the interface between the circuit board and the component is the assembling material, and our ability to show how our products work together and drive and that's something that we've been successful to date. They have an equipment business, we don't have equipment business. We can provide customers to net solution, including equipment that comes from third parties, and we don't have to have the single talent associated with selling equipment, which is a onetime sale, and we see significant increase and drop and also capital associated with that. [indiscernible] business competes with us in what they call [indiscernible] and that's a reasonable size piece there and they're also reliable competitor. And [indiscernible] in the electronics and circuitry market. Our semi business competes with a span of general to private companies, both. We're a market leader in the assembly space, just like we are in the other markets.
Neel Kumar
analystOkay. And then moving to Industrial & Specialty. How trends have evolved there during the year? And how is your performance in this segment year-to-date in quarter?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveSo in our Industrial Solutions business, again, that's got an automotive lean, about 50% of what we sell in Industrial Solutions goes in the automotive end markets. And so the second quarter was a real challenge as OEMs shut down, and so we saw a pretty big drop down in that business April and May, but a really strong recovery in the third quarter. And our recovery significantly outpaced the automotive market. Some of that's attributable to some restocking, some of that is attributable to unit and the types of cars that were being made and more of our content than others. We've seen that business to continue with this momentum and pace of its recovery into the fourth quarter. And so it's been very healthy and [indiscernible].
Neel Kumar
analystOkay. I mean do you have a couple of businesses in the Industrial & Specialty segment. How do you think about the steady overlap of those businesses with the overall portfolio?
Benjamin Gliklich
executivePackaged business and offshore business are exceptionally high quality businesses, above average margins, incredibly low capital intensity. I joke, but our biggest CapEx line in our offshore business over the past 3, 4 years has been fixing the parking lot outside of our Houston office for $100,000. So this is a business that has, again, as I've said, about all of our business, it doesn't require significant capital to sustain it to sustain its margins or to grow. And so they're generating great cash flow. They are market leaders. And the packaging business has some really exciting secular growth trends behind it as the wealth effects drive folks in emerging markets towards more packaged food. And so that's a business that should grow over time. The offshore business is a market leader with exceptional margins. These are great businesses. They're not noncore at all. They may be less core as the commercial overlaps aren't as evident. They are some, but they aren't as evident. And we're not emotional about those businesses, but they fit our model, and they're generating great cash.
Neel Kumar
analyst[Operator Instructions] I have another couple of questions here and some coming from the audience. At your Investor Day last year, you laid out a growth algorithm of about 4% ad growth, margin expansion's about 25% to 80% per year. And you had a goal to double your adjusted EPS to $1.36. Obviously, there is a lot of moving pieces this year. Do you think these objectives are still generally acting forward?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveYes, absolutely, with great conviction. And so again, to take you through that growth algorithm, sort of our through the cycle growth rate, it was 3-ish percent, we said we could grow 1 point or 2 faster than that, convert that topline growth at 1.5 to 2x to EBITDA and then deploy the significant excess cash flow this business generates a compound EPS of teens. Obviously, our end markets have not been helpful in the past 7 quarters. We've demonstrated that 1 to 2 percentage point outperformance from a topline standpoint, probably even more than that, in our first 2 years. We've also demonstrated our ability to run these businesses better, more efficiently and take out cost to get some of that margin expansion that we spoke of. Sitting where we are today, we're coming off a cyclical trough and secular tailwinds are beginning to pick up. So I would expect this business to go faster than the average we've communicated to our investors to that algorithm for at least the next year to come, if not more. And we may not have the same level of operating leverage given the cost that we took out this year in the year to come, but that algorithm of, over time, converting sales growth to EBITDA, 1.5 to 2x remains. And I think we've proven our ability to make these businesses more efficient to get that type of operating leverage in our first second quarters, and it comes to cash flow. And we've done more to improve our cash flow conversion in our first 7 quarters than we thought we could have by we look at what we've done from the balance sheet, what we've done from a tax rate perspective. And so we're going to be generating north of $200 million of cash flow for the next several years. We're comfortable enough with that cash flow sustainability to have initiated a dividend to give a portion of that cash, to return a portion of that cash to investors and still believe we can deliver on that 2023 commitment. We'll have north of $600 million to deploy the combined EPS, and there will be opportunities to do so that are attractive and will drive that high single-digit EBITDA to teens EPS compounding for the years to come.
Neel Kumar
analystGreat. We've got a couple of questions from the audience. First one, can you just touch on the varies initiatives you have in place? Do you have a sustainability report out yet?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveIt's a really good question. We came into this year thinking that we would be well positioned to attract ESG investment because of all the different things we do in our business to improve our customers, manufacturing footprints and environmental. From what we do in the assembly business where we're able to provide reclaimed metals and allows for us to be a sole source provider to several large electronic OEMs to the elimination of hazardous material that we've been able to facilitate in our industrial surface treatment business to the direct mineralization and processes we have in our Circuitry business. And then we found that because we weren't disclosing a lot of our emissions data that we were categorized as a poor performer from an ESG standpoint. And that's just not the case, given our manufacturing footprint or manufacturing processes are far less energy-intensive than a typical chemicals company, right? We're doing blending net molecules synthesis. By and large, what we buy, we ship out because it's formulation. And so the discharge from our facilities is very, very light, yet we weren't disclosing information. So we were rated poorly. That's going to change. And so you should expect a sustainability report from our company to correct those presumptions in the absence of data, people assume the worst, when in reality I think we will compare very favorably in our industry, and we're looking forward to disclosing that in the months to come.
Neel Kumar
analystAnd then the other question that came in. What is your M&A capacity? And would you add another vertical?
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveSo this is a business that generates a lot of cash, and we've been deploying it to compound earnings per share, but we've been buying businesses that are no-brainers that fit squarely within what we do that allow us to be a better solutions provider to our customers. They're available at attractive multiples and are better within our portfolio than outside which means there's high synergy potential. That doesn't sound like adding another vertical. We bought a wastewater treatment business earlier this year that fits squarely within our industrial and electronics customer basis. So it's a solution that will allow us to add more value to customers in those markets, and that may eventually be broken out as a segment, but you shouldn't expect us to be aggressively pursuing M&A, up scale or enter into markets that aren't really relevant and adjacent. It's not overlapping to what we do today.
Neel Kumar
analystGreat. I think we can end it there. So thanks again, Ben, for your time, and appreciate everybody joining us.
Benjamin Gliklich
executiveThanks very much. Thanks, Neel. Thanks for your time.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Element Solutions Inc transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Element Solutions Inc earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.