Enel Américas S.A. (ENELAM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 13, 2020

Santiago Stock Exchange CL Utilities Electric Utilities m_and_a 112 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Enel Américas conference call. My name is Victor, and I'll be your operator for today. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy any securities in any jurisdiction. This presentation should in no way be deemed to be an offer or an invitation to participate and the proposed merger described in this presentation. Such transaction is subject to certain corporate, shareholder and regulatory approvals and to the corporate and securities laws and other regulations applicable in Chile, the United States of America and other relevant jurisdictions. This presentation contains statements that may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements appear throughout this presentation and include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Enel Américas and EGP Américas and their prospective management with respect to, and among other things, Enel Américas' and EGP Américas' business plans, including the proposed merger; trends affecting the Enel Américas's and EGP Américas's financial condition or results of operations, including market trends in the electricity sector in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Costa Rica, Guatemala and Panama; the impact of competition and regulation and electricity sector in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Peru, Costa Rica, Guatemala and Panama; political and economic conditions in the countries in which Enel Américas and EGP Américas and their affiliate operate; and other statements included in this presentation regarding matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantee of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those provided in the forward-looking statements as a result of various risks and uncertainties, including those described in the Enel Américas annual report on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates they were made. None of Enel Américas or EGP Américas or any affiliate undertakes any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law. For all these looking -- forward-looking statements, Enel Américas claims the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. I would now like to turn the presentation over to Mr. Rafael de la Haza, Enel Américas' Head of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Rafael de la Haza Casarrubio

executive
#2

Thank you, Victor. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, [Foreign Language] I'm Rafael de la Haza, Head of Investor Relations of Enel Américas. In the spirit of transparency that is characterizing this process since the beginning, Maurizio Bezzeccheri, our CEO; and Aurelio Bustilho, our CFO, will be joining today's conference call with the purpose of providing more details and attend questions on the transaction announced on September 21. [indiscernible], as you already know, to merge EGP Américas' assets into Enel Américas. Following the presentation, we will have the usual Q&A session. And in line with what we have done recently, questions to the management to our CEO and our CFO, can be made only through the telephone line. Before we start, let me remind you that the media is listening to both the presentation and the Q&A session. Now I give the floor to our CEO, Maurizio Bezzeccheri, who will start by summarizing the contents of this presentation and its scope. Maurizio, the floor is yours.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#3

Thank you, Rafael. In the following slides, we would like to start highlighting the main milestones that the company has achieved since 2016 when our reorganization process took place as well as the [indiscernible] of capital increase. Then we will give more details of the proposed transaction, which includes [indiscernible] of the [indiscernible] for the company products [indiscernible] we will briefly present the [indiscernible] of company [indiscernible] of the transaction [indiscernible] with our [indiscernible] the open for the usual questors and answers [indiscernible]. Let's move now to Page #4 [indiscernible] to our. prudent and robust [indiscernible] [Technical Difficulty]

Rafael de la Haza Casarrubio

executive
#4

Maurizio, sorry, this is Rafael. I think that the quality of your audio is not good. So please take the phone because we can't hear you correctly. Thank you.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#5

Okay.

Rafael de la Haza Casarrubio

executive
#6

So let's start please in page number...

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#7

I will -- yes, yes.

Rafael de la Haza Casarrubio

executive
#8

Okay, thank you.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#9

Okay. The integration of EGP Américas into Enel Américas perfectively fits with our view of the future company. A fully integrated vehicle prepared to be a natural leader in an energy transition scenario in Latin America, where renewable energy is a high priority. On Slide #5, a quick reminder of the proposed transaction. As you already know, the proposed transaction consists of the merger of EGP assets in Central America and South America, excluding Chile, EGP Américas into Enel Américas. Currently, Enel SpA has a 65% stake in Enel Américas and 100% of EGP Américas. The Board of Director of the company has proposed, in line with the evaluators and appraisers, an exchange ratio of 0.43 shares of Enel Américas for each share of EGP Américas or any other exchange ratio to be approved by the extraordinary shareholder meeting within the range of 0.41 and 0.45. The resulting ownership structure based on the mentioned exchange ratio of 0.43 would lead to a 75.5% stake of Enel SpA in Enel Américas and 24.5% stake of the other shareholders without considering any withdrawal rights being exercised. As a result of the transaction, Enel Américas will increase its exposure in hydro and mainly in nonconventional renewable assets across Latin America, especially in Brazil, Peru and Colombia. Turning to Slide 6, we would like to briefly present Enel Green Power. As you can note, it is a leading world player founded in 2018 and present in 5 continents, 28 countries with strong presence in Central and South America. Globally, it has circa 46 gigawatts of installed capacity and a mature pipeline of 51 gigawatts as of September 2020. Considering only the scope of the transaction, the expected 2023 EBITDA of EGP Americas would almost double respect 2020, impairing a CAGR of 24%. In terms of installed capacity, Enel -- EGP Americas has been experiencing an unparalleled growth from 2 gigawatts of operational capacity in 2017 reaching 3.7 gigawatts by year-end 2020 and expecting to reach 7.8 gigawatts of operational capacity in 2024, ensuring growth and benefiting from each unique advanced pipeline. Looking at the status of the platform to be integrated, EGP Americas presents 3.3 gigawatts already in operation, 2.2 gigawatts in execution and 2.4 gigawatts in an advanced development stage. With a well-balanced mix in terms of technology and with Brazil capturing a substantial portion of total capacity. Now let's have a look at the operational pro forma of the resulting company once the merger is completed. As you can note on this slide, the transaction will increase Enel Americas install capacity from the current 11.3 gigawatts to 14.6 gigawatt and expecting to reach 19.1 gigawatt in 2024, assuring company's future cash flow generation. In terms of geographies, representativeness of Brazil, Colombia and Peru, will increase from 61% to 66% in terms of install capacity in a pro forma basis as of September 2020. Moreover, it will increase the importance of renewable generation from 56% to 65%, reaching 73% in 2020 for -- aligned with our ESG strategy. Coming to Slide #8, we will see the leadership position that Enel Americas will represent in the region. The transaction will create a unique platform in Latin America, enhancing our [indiscernible] leadership position in the region, with 2.5 gigawatts of wind and solar and 7 gigawatts of total hydro installed capacity. In addition to the 2.2 gigawatt already in execution and 2.4 gigawatt advanced development stage projects, EGP Americas will contribute the largest pipeline of nonconventional renewable energies in LatAm, providing future cash flow and boosting our energy transition. From a geographical point of view, Enel Américas will expand its presence with the inclusion of Central America in our perimeter operation. Right now to reinforce the main points of the transaction rationale on the following slide. We believe there are 7 key components that drive the transaction. First, integration with the largest nonconventional renewable platform in LatAm with 3.3 gigawatts of capacity under operation, has 2.2 gigawatts in execution, 2.4 gigawatts in advanced development stage and 22.1 gigawatts in the pipeline as of September 2020; boost Enel Americas energy transition, increasing the representation of renewable sources from 56% to 73% on -- of the total generation capacity; unique growth opportunity, leveraging EGPs unparalleled scale and solid track record; stronger balance sheet with a clear room for additional leverage; greater operational and geographical diversification, limiting downside risks; clear opportunities to boost growth in the free market in Latin America benefiting from the combination of conventional and renewable generation sources at competitive prices. And finally, creation of a single and fully integrated development vehicles of renewable in LatAm. Let's now move to Slide #11 to give you more details on the proposed transaction. As previously mentioned, the independent evaluator scope included analysis of fair market condition and the contribution of the transaction to the corporate interest of the company. Santander was appointed by Enel Américas Board and Banchile by Enel Américas Independent Director Committee. In addition to that, Pablo D’Agliano was the appraiser appointed by Enel Américas and David Jana by EGP Américas, who's scope included the issuance of the valuation report of the companies being merged and the relevant share exchange ratio. According to the Chilean law, reports include a pro forma balance sheet of the surviving entity. All the advisers were provided with identical information for their analysis, including EGP Américas and the Enel Américas management presentations, accessed through a virtual data room, weekly question-and-answer session and video conferences with country CFOs and business development team. Let's now move to the next slide to give you more details on the independent evaluators and appraisers conclusion. According to the valuation that you can see on this slide, Enel Américas equity value ranged from USD 12.9 billion (sic) [ USD 12.9 million ] to USD 16.5 billion (sic) [ USD 16.5 million ], a significant premium to undisturbed value, while Enel -- EGP Américas equity value range from USD 5.7 billion (sic) [ USD 5.7 million ] to USD 7.0 billion (sic) [ USD 7.0 million ]. The average of the implied share price of Enel Américas is pretty aligned with the current market consensus of the company, CLP 151 per share as you can observe in the blue line of the chart. As a result of the valuation, midpoint for each independent evaluator and appraiser, Enel's past stake in Enel Américas ranged from 75.2% to 75.9%. We will see later more details on the exchange ratio proposed by the Board of Directors. Let's now have a look on the positive market reaction on Page #13. First, I would like to start by thanking the professionalism of the investment community towards the analysis of this transaction. The mentioned investment community has recognized the following. The process has been carried out with full transparency and with a maximum level of respect, to the applicable legal framework. The valuation of both companies obtained from the independent evaluators and appraisers analysis is fair for all the parties involved. This deal makes sense for -- from an economical and strategical point of view for Enel Américas and all its shareholders. And this has been confirmed from both research analysts and rating agencies. Since the announcement of this transaction, the management team of Enel Américas has duplicated its effort to explain to all the shareholders of the company that contacted us the rational benefit that we foresee if this transaction is approved. In the next coming weeks, we will continue with these efforts to ensure a full understanding of the proposed transaction. On Slide 14, we will present the exchange ratio proposed yesterday by the Board of Directors of the company. In line with the average submitted by evaluator, it has been provided an exchange ratio of 0.43 or any other exchange ratio to be approved by the extraordinary shareholder meeting in the range of 0.41 and 0.45. As mentioned before, the midpoint leads to a 75.5% stake of Enel's stake in Enel Américas and 24.5% stake of the other shareholders without considering any withdrawal rights exercise. According to our highest standard of governance and Chilean corporate law, the transaction is providing a fair treatment of all parties involved and have the unanimous approval from the Board of Directors and a positive outlook from the independent director committee. In order to keep the shareholder rights, dissenting minority shareholders can withdraw during the withdrawal rights period. We consider that the resulting capital structure of Enel Américas will continue being attractive to all our shareholders after the transaction. Before moving to the time line of the next step of the process, let me give you a very quick overview in terms of governance in Slide #15. You can note that Enel Américas will maintain the highest standards in governance among listed companies, being related-party transaction treated according to the Chilean Corporate Law on the top of -- among international standards. If approved, after the merger, Enel Américas will maintain the Board composition will continue to be integrated by 3 independent members in connection with the investment and financing policy of the company, the Board of Directors will continue acting according to the current framework. Company's corporate governance principle also include transparent information system for planning, supervision and coordination purposes as well as the creation of risk policies by Enel Américas to identify, quantify and mitigate any potential conflict of interest. Important to mention that 7 companies, parts of IPSA, excluding Enel Américas, are controlling shareholders with more than 2/3 ownership. On the following slide, you will see a detailed overview of the merger process. We have summarized in this slide the steps of the transaction that have been already completed and the coming milestones of the deal. Since the announcement of the transaction on September 21, the process strictly followed regulator's guidelines, including circa 45-day related party transaction process. Yesterday, the Board of Directors summoned an Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting to be held on December 18, and proposed the exchange ratio for this transaction. If the merger is approved, dissenting shareholders could exercise their withdrawal right in a 30-day period commencing on December 19. The price for withdrawal right exercise in Chilean pesos, CLP 109.79 per share, below the current stock price at Enel Américas at yesterday closing. The merger shall be subject to the satisfaction that the withdrawal rights that Enel Américas shareholders may exercise as a result of the merger should not exceed 10% of the outstanding shares with voting rights issued by the company. We expect the transaction be completed during second quarter 2021. Now I give the floor to our Aurelio, who will illustrate the change that this transaction will make on our equity story.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#10

Thanks, Mauricio. Our equity story is truly unique in the Latin American region. It has been built over the course of the years as a result of the combination of organic growth and the operational excellence and a number of successful strategic transactions. We have been successful in implementing our consolidation strategy of the energy distribution sector in Latin America with the acquisition of one of a kind assets in the region. And our focus over the next decade will be to complement the advantage offered by our relevant customer base with the integration of nonconventional renewable energy while continue to expanding our energy solution to our end users. The merger of Enel Américas and EGP Américas accelerates our strategy and creates the appropriate condition for us to deliver growth and value creation to our shareholders by enhancing even further our equity story in a market with a potential growth in terms of electrification pushed by decarbonization, digitization and decentralization. The proposed transaction consolidates Enel Américas as the leading renewable energy player in the region, accelerates our energy transition process to a greener energy company, creates nonreplicable strategic competitive advantage in the renewable space, maintain our strong balance sheet position to continue exploring M&A opportunities in distribution and minorities lay out, and has our financial stability and cash flow predictability. Let's now look in depth in each point of the new invasive equity story. Today, we have a diversified portfolio in terms of geography and operations in 4 countries, with most of our results coming from our networks and traditional generation business. By merging in -- with EGP Américas, our diversification improved significantly by adding additional renewable energy in new locations throughout Latin America. The relevance of the nonconventional renewable energy segment, which would represent approximately 10% of our combined EBITDA today, is expected to increase significantly over the upcoming years. This is result of the superior growth profile contributed by EGP Américas. In addition, the addition of solar and wind power technology to our generation portfolio will also improve our services offering to a unique position. A higher profitability and competitive advantage will be reached by combining the largest customer base in the -- with the biggest renewable platform in the region. Geographically speaking, EGP Américas will enter countries where it has no operation today, which can represent opportunity for future business development, like, for example, future plans of interconnection Colombia and Panama system. I would like to underline that Panama, for example, is an investment-grade country with a dollarized market, which is also positive to our cash flow generation and effects variation protection. In short, the rebalancing of results between distribution and generation, geographic diversification and the cooperation of more competitive, renewable and clean energy into the Enel's current portfolio will lead the merger company to reduce business risk, hence increase its value by lowering the discount rate for future cash flows. Finally, I would like to underline that the integration proposed is very well aligned with our commitments on SDG goals. Let's now move to Slide #20 to give you more color on the growth expected from the pipeline. As explained in the previous slide, our power generation metrics today is solely based on traditional services, and we do not see it growing in terms of installed capacity. In the short, near term, and in the current strategic plan of Enel Américas, there was no growth contemplated under the traditional generation. On the other hand, while EGP Américas already has 3.3 gigawatts of installed capacity in operation, it is expected to more than double its capacity by 2024, reaching 7.9 gigawatts. Out of the total, 4.6 gigawatts growth in installed capacity by 2024, 2.2 gigawatts is already under construction, and the remaining 2.4 gigawatts is in a very advanced stage of development. This last part represents only a small part, approximately 10% of EGP Américas' total pipeline. This total pipeline is significant and totals more than 22 gigawatts, which we'll present in more detail in the following slides. If we were to consider only the asset in operation, the 11.3 plus the 3.3 and growth included in the business plan, Enel Américas installed capacity is expected to grow approximately 70% by 2024. On the following slide, #21, I'm going to give you more details on the mentioned pipeline. Here, we have a more detailed view of the total pipeline. The 2.4 gigawatts you see in the first column is what is considered in the EGP Américas business plan. While the other 3 columns shows a more detailed breakdown by geography, and at different stage of maturity of the 22 gigawatts pipeline, not included in the business plan 2024. As you can see, there is a relevant part of the total pipeline, totaling 7.6 gigawatts in the vast majority of the cases. The projects included in the major group have land secured, resource measured, available grid connection and environmental license. This combination of factors increased the profitability of such pipeline becoming operational in the near to medium term. There is more -- there is also more 14 gigawatts of pipeline in less advanced stages of development that could become operational further down the road. Let me now give you a quick overview on the market outlook for nonconventional renewable energy in the region in the next slide. Market outlook in the region is completely aligned with the strategy we are pursuing of making a big step in transitioning to renewable energy services. As previously mentioned, the merger will create one of the largest renewable platform in Latin America. According to public services, the installed capacity growth in the region for the next 30 years will come completely from green energy sources. It is expected by 2050, at least 53% of installed capacity in LatAm will be renewable sources, with that number potentially being as much as 67% in a more optimistic scenario. Along the same lines, governments of main markets have already expressed the transition to clean energy as one of the main objectives in the sector. Some of them already approved specific policies and tax incentives to incentivize and facilitate investment in renewable energy because it's cheaper, it's clean, it is sustainable. In the following slide, #23, some color on the track record of EGP and the competitive advantage to be obtained from this global leader. As we have highlighted throughout the presentation, the transaction represents a unique growth opportunity leveraging on EGP's unparalleled scale and solid track record in developing and implementing renewables projects. EGP Américas will not only have one of the largest renewables platform in Latin America through our portfolio, but also a platform with truly unique competitive advantages that come with the benefit of having access to EGP global organization. The sourcing scale allowing procurement advantage, driving lower CapEx delivery and ultimately enhancing cash flow generation. Being part of a global and flexible engineering and construction organization enables more efficient project management capabilities, and with this, more fast time to EBITDA. The global operation and maintenance platforms ensure operational excellence and efficiency. EGP has an unparalleled track record of new asset delivery and continuous pipeline replenishment in the recent years. EGP Américas will continue to benefit from such track record and to meet additional capacity delivering targets. Let's now move to Slide #24, which contains the analysis of the positive impacts of the integration in terms of leverage capacity. This transaction will be immediately leveraged neutral, and we expect that the leveraging effect as renewable capacity in construction comes online and put in operation. Our balance sheet will, therefore, remain well positioned to fund organic growth and will retain significant power to pursue any attractive strategic M&A or minority buyout in the future. The leverage ratio will remain well below 2.5x leverage threshold, that is always under control by Enel Américas. Maintaining a solid balance sheet and capital structure will bring multiple benefits to the company such as reaffirmation in the company's investment-grade ratings, the possibility to achieve even lower cost of debt due to more ESG-focused business, greater financial flexibility allowing the company to have access to multiple financing alternatives and M&A opportunities. Now on the following slide, Maurizio will conclude this presentation with the closing remarks.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#11

Before opening for questions, please allow me to provide a few closing remarks on the proposed merger of EGP Américas platform. This envisioned transaction comes on the back of a successful expansion strategy led by the company since it's beginning in 2016. We have consistently created value for our shareholders delivering on our goals of becoming the largest private utility company in the region to leader the energy transition process. This transaction will deliver a stronger Enel Américas with a more diversified business and geographical presences to minimize risk and create value to all our shareholders. As we continue positioning ourselves for multiple growth opportunity ahead of us, including, but not limited to minority buyouts, consolidation and privatization opportunities. This capital increase will put us in a stronger condition to push such growth plan. Finally, the proposed merger will create a single and fully integrated development vehicles in LatAm. The floor is yours, Rafael.

Rafael de la Haza Casarrubio

executive
#12

Well, thank you, Maurizio, Aurelio. Thanks for your time and listening to the operation. I now pass the call to the operator for the Q&A session. Operator, please proceed.

Operator

operator
#13

[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of Juan Barrios from [ Segal Capital ].

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#14

Now so our question is regarding -- if you could please help us to understand what price assumptions were considered for the 2.2 gigawatt projects under execution as well as a 2.4 gigawatts in advanced development stage for EGP? And also, we would like to know how much of the 22.1 gigawatt pipeline was considered in the evaluation being done? If I'm right, those details were not publicly available in any of the reports that we have access to from both the appraisers and the independent evaluators. So those are the questions.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#15

Okay. Regarding the methodology applied, the methodology is discount cash flow. I suppose the evaluator took in consideration a discount cash flow based on some percentage of success or some percentage of risk. The 2.2 gigawatt in construction are coming in operation in 2020, 2021 and 2022. In the reality, we have -- we spoke during this conference call of 3.3 gigawatts up today, but this 3.3 is expected to become 3.7 already at the end of this year. And then we'll continue and are right now under construction. They are opening already the construction location, et cetera. So we expect we will come into operation in 2022 -- and up to 2022. The 2.4 gigawatts are based on as -- already we told based on the EGP business plan. And the -- I suppose the evaluators, I just recalled that these are independent evaluators. They, of course, for sure, based on their experience or pipeline thing -- track record. And they think -- they -- on consideration, they have evaluated this additional 2.5 -- 2.4 gigawatts of projects in advanced stage of development that have showed already, Aurelio, our project with all permit already in their own end. I just recall that Santander in Chile, they have a quite huge track record in terms of valuation of such kind of a deal. And finally, the 22 gigawatts, there are different valuations by the 2 independent evaluators and the 2 appraisers based on their own experience. Usually, this is common practice in the market that you will, for example, attribute success rate based on the permitting and then you discount this total amount of 22 gigawatt to defined amount of the -- of megawatt, final megawatt, and then you apply this cash flow. The independent evaluator -- and this had been our constant attention as border without limiting their independent evaluation is it has been just to evaluate that -- to control that this valuation are based on the common standard in the market.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#16

Okay. But the prices are not disclosed, right? For the [indiscernible]?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#17

Sorry?

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#18

But the prices are not going to be disclosed for the report? Because something with you now...

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#19

This is true.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#20

I can answer to this point. I can answer this point that price, Juan Pablo -- sorry, Juan Pablo, the price is of this energy in the future is between $20 to $30, okay, per megawatt hour.

Operator

operator
#21

Our next question will come from the line of Charles Fishman from Morningstar.

Charles Fishman

analyst
#22

Do you anticipate any change in the dividend policy post transaction?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#23

No. But in the reality, we will continue with our policy -- dividend policy, but Aurelio, please go ahead.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#24

Thank you, Maurizio. Charles, yes, you're right. We are not estimating no changes in the dividend policy since the company is very well balanced in terms of financial position.

Charles Fishman

analyst
#25

Okay. So 50% payout is what we should expect?

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#26

50%, Yes. 50% payout.

Operator

operator
#27

The next question will come from the line now of Sara Piccinini from Mediobanca.

Sara Piccinini

analyst
#28

I have 4. So the first question is on the revenues profile of Enel Americas. Could you please share how much are the revenues covered by PPAs of the existing assets and also the secured pipeline? If there is any hedging strategy or how much is exposed to merchant? So any indication on this? And also, a clarification maybe, is the pipeline increased versus what you have announced in September? Because I remember a number more in the region of a 12, 13 gigawatts, and now we are looking at a much higher number of around 22 gigawatt additional. So if you can specify on that. Then the second question is on the net debt to EBITDA. If I understand correctly, you say that you will maintain a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio below the 12.5 -- sorry, 2.5x. Does this mean that this is your net debt-to-EBITDA threshold while you are delivering on the pipeline? And if you see any M&A opportunity, would you go above this 2.5x? And then the last 2 questions on the transaction details. So there was a limit in your bylaw saying that you had a 65% limit of the voting rights and that should be removed in order to allow Enel to go above the 75% you are showing now. So has this been limit been removed? So that you can foresee Enel group to have 75% stake in your share capital? And finally, could you please repeat, again, the condition at which it's -- subject the approval in terms of withdrawal rights?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#29

Okay. I will take the first and the second. I will just make some reservation on the fourth and fifth. Regarding merchant exposure in general, it's not policy of Enel going merchant for the plant, even more if you are talking on renewable assets. In general -- or you have a PPA based on public auction for distribution company or you have a PPA of 10, 15 years with free customers that usually are a big industrial customer, considering the prioritization, the -- some of the attendance of free market in Latin America, mostly in Brazil. Regarding the second question, how it was possible, 12 up to 22 gigawatt. Just to recall that the number of 12 was based on public information available in the press. And for this reason, we explain all the times, this -- been the basis for the 12 gigawatt. The 22 gigawatt comes from the analysis of data room of the 4, 2 independent evaluators and 2 appraisers that were in that room. So the 22 gigawatt comes from the analysis of documentation in data room. Regarding the 65% to 75%, 65% limits, et cetera. No, it's not removed. In the reality, this transaction will be done only if will be removed this 65% because I just recall, this is a merger, a capital increase that would be subscribed by Enel SpA in terms of assets. Regarding the withdrawal right, the Board of Directors fixed at 10% of the outstanding share withdrawal rights possible. And the shareholders will vote against the transaction we'll have in 30 days after shareholder meeting. The possibility to have -- to withdraw the price defined bylaw comes out from the calculation of almost CLP 110. And as we underlined during the presentation, this CLP 110 almost are below the value of the shares at the closing of yesterday. Regarding net debt EBITDA, I will let Aurelio reply.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#30

Thanks, Sara, for the question. Yes, we maintained this limit of 2.5x net debt to EBITDA because it wins us an investment grade in the company. And this -- the interesting side of this transaction -- this proposed transaction is that we position ourselves in the renewables without touching this, let's say, the power space to keep on getting opportunities in the region in distribution, M&A transactions in minorities buyout. Analytics business like electromobility, we are investing also in smart life. And so this it's very interesting, the positioning that we have, that we maintain the strategy to position as the biggest client base or customer base or in the user base,with the biggest renewable basis without touching the -- our fire power in order to keep on growing and taking advantage of new opportunities. And again, introducing new geography, which is something that would be very interesting in its products.

Sara Piccinini

analyst
#31

Sorry, just I have last one. Is the approval of the 65% threshold to be voted on 18 December on the extraordinary shareholders meeting?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#32

Si, Si. In the -- let's say, the dynamic of the extraordinary shareholder meeting will be an approved -- an approval of the transaction, subject to the fact that we remove the 65% limit. The tests of these issues are in the -- as well in the [indiscernible] that has been sent yesterday to the commission Mercato Telematico Azionario and as well by the press release that we issued yesterday night.

Operator

operator
#33

Our next question next question comes a line of Lueder Schumacher from SG.

Lueder Schumacher

analyst
#34

Yes. Lueder Schuma here, SocGen. A couple of questions for me. The first one is on the cap. You said the 65% cap has to be removed for the transaction to go ahead. Will there be a new cap at 75.5%? Or could Enel if they choose to do so in the future increase the stake further? That's the first question. The second one is really on the process by [indiscernible] percent of [indiscernible]

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#35

Sorry? We lost the second question.

Lueder Schumacher

analyst
#36

Vote against the compensation CLP 110. But what is more than a -- the second question is on the [indiscernible] do not expect the terms of the transaction, they can accept the CLP 110. But what happens if it's more than 10%, which do not accept the terms. And the third question is, I was quite intrigued on the payout ratio, the question you answered earlier. So are you expecting cash flow to be strongly enough to finance the quite ambitious growth ambitions in renewables and also your traditional core business and keep the payout ratio at 50%? Or is leveraging up the balance sheet part of the consideration as well.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#37

I will reply, even though, I catch only part of your second question, and then I will let Aurelio to integrate. Regarding the fact that we removed the 65% following the Chilean law, you cannot put another threshold. So the possibility for Enel to continue to grow in the company exist. Second, if the withdrawal right will exceed the 10%, I think the transaction will not pass, but I will let -- and I will let now our General Counsel, just to be more precise in this aspect. And the third question in general, and this is, I think, the story that is the market story of Enel Green Power. Enel Green Power has always been able just to generate enough cash flow to allow the majority of its growth. As a consequence, the payout ratio for our dividend for sure will be not affected by the growth in renewable energy. Aurelio, I don't know if Domingo can elaborate a little bit more regarding the exceeding of 10% of withdrawal right? And Aurelio regarding the dividend payout, please?

Domingo Valdés Prieto

executive
#38

Thank you, Maurizio. Good morning to everyone. This is Domingo Valdés, General Counsel. Regarding the question of the 10%, we should consider that according to the call done by the Board, the extraordinary shareholders meeting, which will take place on December 18, we'll have to decide regarding certain conditions that are associated to this merger. And particularly amongst those conditions, it is least 10%. So if by any reason, shareholders who are dissenting and would like to exercise the withdrawal rights exceed 10%, then the merger is going to be considered or deemed to fail.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#39

Lueder, thank you for the question. Yes, we, as Maurizio said and as I said before, we -- our policy -- our strategy is to maintain the 50% payout even with the deployment of the project. And even we acquired or increased some M&A distribution opportunities. Of course, we'll take in consideration the returns and we are very discipline in terms of returns of financial returns on further acquisition, as which we are showing like we did in São Paulo and in Goiás. So there's nothing to change this proposal to maintain the 50% policy. Of course, this year, we passed through a very -- all of us, a very difficult and tough situation with the COVID. But hopefully, we did it not so bad, especially with Brazilian support in terms of financial support, the contract was the big issue. So this could be something that we would review. But since we are in a very good track on this. So there's nothing that we can -- that we need to change our policy and so the proposal is to maintain the 50% payout for the following years.

Operator

operator
#40

Our next question will come from line Murilo Riccini from Banco Santander.

Murilo Riccini

analyst
#41

This is Murilo Riccini from Santander. That's a very interesting in your view about the importance of having renewable assets in the generation portfolio. And I'd like to explore a little more the component and the rationale behind the valuation of them. How do you evaluate the highest multiples of renewable assets versus the conventional ones? Because it seems that the premium implied is not only justified by the growth option, but also by other elements, such as access and cost of capital, better rating -- credit rating profile, social acceptance, among others. Could you comment more on that and the future benefits that you see in the incorporation of renewable assets to the portfolio?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#42

Yes. Of course, all the aspects you already mentioned are implied in the big opportunities coming from renewable. Independent, we consider that in a decarbonized environment like Latin America is pushing and is going into this strong direction of the carbonization, of course, renewables are a key component of this general move of the -- for the -- in direction of renewables. Then numbers, if you look at the first consideration is that if you look at the statistic of the last 10, 15 years, the megawatt of the amount of investment in a new plant, any new renewable plant exceed the investment on conventional generation, even though if you exclude China. And the fact that if you look at the, for example, Brazil, it's one of the biggest perimeter that we are considering right now in our possible transaction, proposed transaction. If you look at the layout, the number since 2009, I think, more than 90% of the new energy is renewable energy. It's not conventional one. In Colombia, it was the country, which coal and oil is a key fuel. We started to have the first auction in terms of renewable energy. And in terms of the capacity market has been opened in Colombia as well for renewable energy. And the government recently announced a new renewable auction next year. The same story in Peru, which renewable have been opened at the capacity market. And if you consider the fact that you have an up and down in terms of fuel cost, after -- during the COVID, we have experienced regarding oil price, the renewable energy with each contract -- long-term contract -- medium, long-term contracts ensures a vision of the price at 10, 15 years, 20 years and at a very low level. In the reality, the renewable energy introduction in the world, but in Latin America as well has been a very huge pressure on price reduction. Why? Because you have no fuel cost during the life of the renewable energy. And on the other side, you have lowered a lot the initial capital investment by reduction of unitary price for solar -- and for solar and wind. And finally, as you mentioned, of course, in the last, let's say, 2 years. The ESG bond and -- is taking a quite huge, strong evidence in the financial market. And finally, if you consider the last year, biggest investment funds in North European Investment fund and this has decided to go out from companies that have a big exposure to coal, for example. So there are the financial community that usually is very conservative in considering technological shift that is moving clearly in direction. But not just because it's green, but because it's economical, more competitive that conventional energy makes security of fuel supply because you have wind, solar available without any transportation. And as you said, finally, there is a biggest acceptance by the local community because around renewable, you develop a sustainable business model in general in terms of -- during the construction of the plant, that also during the maintenance and the business model, the sustainable business model, have to include this kind of aspect. Consideration that we, of course, applied in our distribution assets that we apply, for example, in Enel Americas, in -- around our hydro plant that we have in our portfolio in all countries we are mentioning. So there are not only just environmental reasons, there are economical reasons. There is a cheaper and more competitive energy gives -- contribute to decarbonization. So it's a more economicAES LatAm cheap energy, gives a cheaper price and guarantee further development around the around the plan. And finally, just one other consideration. It's one plant, one investment with a very short time to EBITDA. You see if you consider -- taking into consideration as well the social awareness in general, you can take 4, 5 years to build a conventional power plant and you will come into operation with a solar or wind farm in 1 year, 1.5 years. So time to EBITDA is quite -- as well from the financial cash flow point of view, you have advantages in using renewable in your portfolio. And finally, why -- as we said through our presentation, why as management of Enel Americas we are proposing -- we started a discussion within the Board of Directors in June this year. And we continue discussing with the Board along these months is the fact that we also confirmed by the final papers of the evaluator prices, we are getting the best, a wider platform to grow in renewable in Latin America.

Operator

operator
#43

Our next question will come from the line of Fraser Haro from Verdane Standards.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#44

I just want to maybe cover or go back over a point that was raised previously to do with the cap of ownership with Enel. You mentioned that it's not possible to include another threshold after the 65% is renewed. But I just wanted to confirm that, that means Enel SpA could continue purchasing shares up until what point because I would imagine that there must be an ownership level where an offer would be made given potential liquidity constraints to the market, if Enel continued to purchase up to relatively high percent of all ownership?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#45

Thank you your question, but unfortunately, you need to ask to Enel. They will -- what we can tell you from the perspective of Enel Americas and based on the Chilean law, Enel can continue to grow after the merging. What will be then, there are some other conditions. But if Enel will continue to grow, you need to ask directly to Enel. As Enel Americas, we are just presenting what's the law -- the legal framework will allow. Sorry, but I cannot give you a reply.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#46

No, no, I understand -- maybe I phrased the question poorly. I suppose what I mean in other markets, if a shareholder in a certain amount, say, like 90%, then they would have to make an offer for the remainder of the shares. So I'm just trying to understand, in Chile, would Enel be able to own 95% of the shares, say, and Enel Americas potentially be listed on the exchange?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#47

No, this is exactly what is in Chilean law. If Enel growing will get up to 95%, there will be another withdrawal right. This is exactly what say the Chilean law. If Enel will get 95%, they need to allow another withdrawal right for minority shareholders. I don't know if our Counsel, Domingo would like to add something more.

Domingo Valdés Prieto

executive
#48

Thank you, Maurizio. As you have explained, if by any reason, Enel SpA exceeds 95%, that event by itself triggers a withdrawal right. And as explained before, that withdrawal right will have a price, which is predetermined by Chilean law. So there is no discretion on the price to be paid.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#49

As you mentioned -- Yes, and thanks for the question because it allows me just to underline a topic, I think it's very important that was already a topic of question in the previous meeting we get with investors, and is the botherness. We have done synoptic analysis of the Chilean law with other Latin American legislation, with Italian legislation, with Spanish legislation, with civil law legislation. And the results of these synoptic analysis that can be available for all the investors that are interested in. And when we will start the Non Deal Roadshow after this call, the final result is that Chilean law is in line with the best legislation in terms of protection of minority. And in some cases, the Chilean legislation is even more protective of minority rights. And of course, we can -- in next days, whoever is interested in go -- in a deeper analysis on these topics, we are fully available. Thanks, again, for the question.

Operator

operator
#50

Our next question comes from the line of Lilyanna Yang from HSBC.

Lilyanna Yang

analyst
#51

I have two questions. One is a follow-up on previous questions. But maybe my question is, number one is, why not voluntarily put a new cap that is, say, 80%, but not 95% in your own bylaws? So as you oblige for a tender offer in case in the scenario that Enel Italy decides or wants to increase its stake in Enel Americas further. So it seems like by the questions I get from the investors that it could address the investor concern that Enel would be slowly reducing the free float. And the concern here is that with a lower free float, the amount of shares, the pension funds and other funds could own of Enel America shares also gets down. So that's the first question. The second question, just for me to understand a little bit further. So I do get all the benefits for Enel Americas to get the Enel Green Power Americas assets. But I was wondering if what will be the benefit for the merger from Enel Italy standpoint if Enel Italy already owns both assets? And I wonder if the answer goes into the integration of the teams. So my question is, with the assets and the Enel Green Power markets and the development officers also move on to be part of Enel Americas team? And together with that, I wonder if you would have any views, if it would make sense for Enel Americas to, down the road, merge back with Enel Chile assets, so that you have all South Central America together, right? Or Latin America altogether in one vehicle.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#52

Okay. Regarding the -- let's start from the third question. Regarding the third question, we need to go back to the rationale and to the history. When -- have been created Enel Americas was 2016. At that time, there was a unique company that was [indiscernible], having all the assets and with cross participation in distribution and in generation. At that point, the market was pushing for a better clarity in terms of relationships. So the market has for a better understanding of the flow between holding and generation distribution company. This was the reason why there's been created Enel Chile and Enel Americas. What is the difference between the two? Enel Chile after another deal in which have been incorporated, renewable in conventional and distribution business, Enel Chile is a very well established market with less perspective of the growth at the time, we are talking 2016. And have been created another vehicle Enel américas in which there were market more risky, but with a higher perspective of growth. So this is the rationale why, based on market request was created energy on 1 Side Enel Américas on the other side. And of course, why today, making the what's the interest of Enel in having a combined vehicle, once again, market request market in general since many years since the merging of renewable energy in Enel Chile, the market is asking since then, why you don't do the same transaction with Enel America? Having a unique and only just 1 vehicle just to develop synergies that can, of course, be in favor of the customers in favor of clients of Enel Americas and Enel Green Power. So at this point, once again, based on request of the market, we, as Enel Americas, we didn't take into consideration this hypothesis of merger for, let's say, 2 years. I just came, for example, in Enel Americas, in 2018, and our first target at this point was just to get Enel America, once again, on the route of growth. At that time, after the acquisition of Enel Distribution São Paulo, there were no more space for growth. And for this reason, we went through a capital increase. Finalize the capital increase. Now we are in the financial condition to continue to grow in distribution business, why we have a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio in the range of 1.4, 1.3 and for this reason, we are now securized the growth -- the eventual possibility to grow in organic in distribution business. At the end of the story, the merging with Enel Green Power with its capability to generate cash flow, able to -- allows the growth of 1,000, 2,000 megawatts per year. This is a successful story. So the interest of Enel will be moved in one of the controlling company in which they will reply to the request of the market. And adding a close cooperation between Enel Americas and the EGP Americas, we will be able just to get, as we already told during this press release, we will be able just to, for example, follow the possibility for new free market opportunity. And on the other side, really, you have no reduction of free float. You are issuing new shares and you will not absolutely reduce free float. I don't know if I replied to your question. And if Aurelio would like to add something else.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#53

Lily, thank you for your questions. I think Maurizio answered the questions pretty much well. I think maybe the question regarding the voluntarily kept by Enel that you mentioned. Again, this is something that you should ask to Enel. It's not for the administration of the company and also the other shareholders of the company, okay? I think the only one that missed the answer. I -- yes. Sorry.

Operator

operator
#54

Our next question will come from [indiscernible] Maria from East [indiscernible] .

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#55

I have one question. You said that this transaction creates value to all shareholders. And I missed in this presentation and in all the evaluator presentation a forecast of net income to see if these great values or not. So I don't know if you have a forecast of what is or what will be the net income of EGP Americas? Because until now, if we see the income statements of EGP of the first 9 months of this year, it's negative. And last year, it was almost 0. So I want to understand that to see if this create value or not.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#56

Okay. Thank you. I will let Aurelio reply, but let's say, we have done an exercise of earnings per share analysis. And we think in 1 year, 1.5 year, you will recover the level -- the present level of Enel Americas. But sorry, Aurelio, please correct me if I'm wrong.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#57

No problem. No, that's perfect answer. Exactly this true. Thank you for the question. We'll take advantage, as Maurizio explained, in the next on the road show to explain in details of this. But yes, in the next 1.5 years or 2 years, we'll recover the level that we have in terms of earning per share. Why is that? Because Enel Green Power is a different company, developing -- a very fast-developing company times to EBITDA. But in the first year, it's not possible to reach the earning per share. In 2022, we are estimating and we can present this in details. We are talking about with the merger around $2.1 billion. Of course, we are reviewing the plan, but about $2.21 billion, $2.26 billion around this depending on the FX rate of net income consolidated. But again, as Maurizio has explained, the earnings per share, the level of earnings per share will increase pretty much almost, let's say, greater than around 60% in the next 5 years. But it's not possible to do this in 2021. But in 2022, we recover the same level. And then after this we will increase progressively since the projects are entering commercial operation.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#58

Let me add Aurelio, that we consider that this will be accretive within the plan, consider that as we presented already, we will have a ramp-up of investment in the next 3 years. But as Aurelio said, we are at your full -- we are totally available during the Non Deal Roadshow, just to go deeper in the analysis we have done regarding net income, in general, the analysis of earnings per share, dividend per share, we have done. So no problem at all. But we can say that this merger will be accretive within the plan, 3-year plans.

Operator

operator
#59

Our next question comes from the line of [indiscernible] from ASP Capital.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#60

I have 2 questions. One is about the 2.2 gigawatts under construction and the 2.4 in advanced stage. I was wondering if all of those projects were -- have PPAs already signed? And my second question is about the [indiscernible] financial situation because on September, you said that this company had $1.2 billion of net debt. And now in the evaluators report, we can -- they have like $100 million net cash. So why is that a company that is so CapEx-intensive has net cash.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#61

Let's say, I will let the second, Aurelio to reply. But of course, I repeat, when we were just mentioning during the first phase was based on public available information. This is exactly what is coming into the due diligence analysis in terms of investment. Of course, regarding the 2.2 megawatt in construction, you can imagine that this project are already with a commitment of and already in construction. Regarding the coverage of PPA in this project consider that in Enel, you start the construction or you start -- you approve an investment only if it's covered by PPA. We consider, we have experienced, we have seen that Enel usually approved investment in terms of no merchant investments. So in general, when you start the construction of the plant, you can imagine that this plan is covered by PPAs. Regarding the $2.4 billion as well. In general, it's to go through the approval, that it's already PPA under negotiation. So this is just the quick reply to your first question. Second question, I give just and I ask if Aurelio can integrate the reply to the second question, please.

Aurelio de Oliveira

executive
#62

Okay. Thank you, Pilar, for the question. Well, the company, as you mentioned, and Enel Green Power Americas is very intensive in terms of the velocity of putting function, the projects and executing the procurement and the purchase equipment assure the price of equipment. So the -- of course, it's not -- we are not managing the company right now. But what we got from the information from the company is that the company is already assuring the CapEx, the financial CapEx for the projects that are entering in function that they put to in operation for the next year. So basically to assure price of equipment and so on. The company business, if you asked me, what's the financial strategy. I cannot tell you because we are not managing the financially this company. But again, for us, it's something that makes sense in terms of getting the company capitalized and projects that are putting function very fast. If you see, for example, the last year's capacity that Maurizio presented in the presentation. It increased almost 800 megawatts in 12 months, in 1 year. 600 in 9 months. So it's very intensive in terms of putting -- it's a different company. Because it's the company takes advantage of this interesting capacity to improve the capacity or the generation capacity in the region and take advantage of its procurement and financial situation, okay?

Operator

operator
#63

And our next question will come from Rodrigo Mora from Moneda.

Rodrigo Mora

analyst
#64

Maurizio, had a couple of questions. The first one is related to the pipeline that the future pipeline that is about 22.1 gigawatt. I would like to understand if the valuation just only included the 3.3 gigawatt operating at the end of 2020, plus 4.6 gigawatt of the plan through 2024. This is my first question. Also, with this question, I would like to -- have to be clear, if 3.3 gigawatt operating at the end of 2020 is fully financed. Because I -- when I read the appraisal report, also, Santander Banchile said that the operating capacity at the end of 2020 will be 3.7 gigawatts. So that have a bit confused with how -- what is the total capacity fully finance it? This is my first question. And the second question is this transaction was include Enel Green Power Central America. I wonder why Enel Green Power Mexico that actually operate 3 gigawatts was not included at this transaction?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#65

So in totality, Rodrigo, three questions. First question is related to the 22.1 gigawatts. That 22.1 gigawatts have been evaluated by Santander and Banchile and the 2 appraisers based on the usual evaluation of pipeline. In general, you can attribute one that you go into the data room. You see all the documentation related to the project. You see the level of permit, as shown in the chart of Aurelio as a result of the due diligence. Usually, there are common used methodology or you apply a certain price for megawatt in terms of development. If you -- for example, you consider to sell the project tomorrow or you apply base net percentage of success of the project, and so the 22 gigawatts based on the success rate, you will reduce some standard. So these are well-known methodology of valuation in the world of banks or in a world of market field. So the independent evaluator and the appraisers apply to the 22.1 gigawatt pipeline, the traditional way of evaluating that usually is based on the level of permit of each one of the project because they had access to each one of the project composing the 22.1 gigawatts. As I told before, our main effort has been just to analyze -- to intend independence of the valuator is just to understand if we were moving in the direction conventional way of valuation and second, that all the independent evaluator and the appraisers was in front of the same data analysis that we're doing. So this was our constant controlled. Regarding the second question, the 3.3 or 3.7. As we said, I fully understand that it can be confusing. But as we said, 3.3 gigawatt in operation is the megawatt in operation at 30 September. The 3.7 is the megawatt that will be in operation at the end of the year. So the difference of 400-megawatt is just the megawatts that are under advanced stage of construction that will come into operation at the end of the year. And this was as well based on the fact there was sort of technical due diligence on the state of the project. And this, I repeat, on the experience of Santander and Banchile that are quite used common, analyzing this type of this type of project. And finally, of course, if the 3.7 being considered in operation at the end of the year, they will be totally financed because, of course, as you know, when you start the construction, you have already paid the top -- the majority of the equipment, you are already fulfilled the majority of the contract, and this project comes already funded. And part of the 2.2 gigawatts that we continue to be built already, you can imagine that as already with contract related to the equipment because usually, you may contract for the equipment 1 year, 1.5 year before the starting of construction and as well the contract related to construction of the power plant. So majority as well are funded. I don't know if I replied to your 3 questions. Rodrigo?

Rodrigo Mora

analyst
#66

The last question is about why Enel Green Power Mexico was not included at this transaction?

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#67

Correct. Correct. Sure, sure, sure. Let's say that, first of all, they in Mexico, just -- this is a [indiscernible] that looks like a good market for development. Even though we have -- we started development in Mexico, and we grow up to 3 megawatts, but this is my personal consideration. The consideration of Central America, in not Mexico, Central America, it's based on the fact that we are member of the CPEC transmission lines, CPEC company. And so have been evaluated from the perspective of Colombian business as an interesting perspective for continuing to grow having more opportunity from Colombia into the direction, Central America, considering that as well right now, Guatemala, for a certain period has exported energy to Mexico, now is cutted off. And also considering that in Enel world, Enel Mexico is belonging to Enel North America, in Enel North America region. So is considering for this reason. So strategical reason forced, including Central America, for the opportunity coming up from the connection between Colombia and Panama. And second, because this is part of the region -- North America region and North -- South America region.

Rodrigo Mora

analyst
#68

Okay. Just one question related to the with this transaction. I wonder, is it the last restricting process of Enel Americas, or at future, there will be other restructured process.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#69

Rodrigo, as we have explained and shown around these years we are trying to build up the better Enel Américas company for our shareholders. As you know, we went through the capital increase, we are now proposing to the shareholders to decide regarding the merging. And as I said before, this is -- this is -- let me say, another fulfillment of the general request of the market regarding making a unique and exclusive vehicle for growth in Latin America. For the time being, I am not -- I don't see any other restructuring process as we did with [indiscernible] capital increase as soon as we absorb the effect, we will think if there will be, in the future, more additional move that can create value for our shareholders, always. So for the time being, I -- if this will be approved by the shareholder meeting, would be enough work to be done and to keep us busy a certain time before to thinking some other change in the reorganization of Enel Americas.

Rodrigo Mora

analyst
#70

Finally, Maurizio, I would like to ask to Aurelio if after the call, if you could presented the impact of the transaction at the earnings per share along the.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#71

Si. Si. Si.

Rodrigo Mora

analyst
#72

I think is very important to understand how dilutive the transaction is and how -- in how many years the transaction is going to aggregated, please.

Maurizio Bezzeccheri

executive
#73

Yes, of course, we repeat, we will be available in our Non Deal Roadshow to explain details. And as we said, the operation from our calculation are accretive in the years of the plan. But of course, we can go. We have no problem going in detail, just to look at these numbers.

Operator

operator
#74

And I'm currently not showing any questions at this time.

Rafael de la Haza Casarrubio

executive
#75

Well, thank you to the audience. Thank you, Maurizio, Aurelio, Domingo. It was a very clear and complete conference call. We conclude this event, but let me remind you, it is a finalizing that the management team of the company and Investor Relations team will continue to be available for any doubt, any clarification you may need in the next coming weeks. And thank you very much, again. Have a nice weekend and stay safe.

Operator

operator
#76

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Enel Américas S.A. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Enel Américas S.A. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.