Enovis Corporation (ENOV) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

September 15, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Health Care Health Care Equipment and Supplies conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#1

Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to Virtual Laguna. I'm Joshua Pokrzywinski, the firm's U.S. electrical equipment and multi-industry analyst. Here with me this afternoon is Chris Hix, EVP and CFO of Colfax. Chris, thanks for joining us this afternoon. Understand you have a few slides and opening remarks you'd like to make. Before I hand it off to you, though, I do need to read just a quick disclaimer before we get started. Please note that this webcast is for Morgan Stanley's clients and appropriate Morgan Stanley employees only. This webcast is not for members of the press. If you are a member of the press, please disconnect and reach out separately. For important disclosures, please see the Morgan Stanley research disclosure website at morganstanley.com/researchdisclosures. If you have any questions, please reach out to your Morgan Stanley sales representative. With that, Chris, welcome. Appreciate you taking the time here. Hope you are safe and healthy and mentally well-adjusted to what 2020 has to offer. Why don't you just take it away on some of the prepared remarks and refer folks to the slide deck posted on the IR website?

Christopher Hix

executive
#2

Okay. Very good. Well, Josh, first off, thank you, and thanks, Morgan Stanley, for having us at the conference here. Look forward to doing it when we can see the ocean again and see the surfers down there all day long. But -- and thanks to investors for your interest in Colfax. We do have some slides to accompany some brief remarks for those of you who are a little bit less familiar with our company or just wish to get grounded before we jump into Q&A. So if you have the slides in front, if you go to Slide 3, it's really just an overview slide that talks about who we are as a company. Most people know that we were founded by Mitch and Steve Rales back in the 1990s, with the idea of having a multi-platform company with a compounder strategy. And you compound 2 ways -- compound value 2 ways. One is by just continuously improving your businesses every day and not necessarily in heroic ways, but just it's the benefit of doing that longer term. And the second is deploying your capital for acquisitions that make your businesses bigger and stronger. And so by executing that right, it's a strategy that many companies have used to drive incredible value. If you go to the next slide, that's Slide 4, I think most people by now are aware of the change in the portfolio that we've executed over the last few years. Many of us are -- I've been with the company now for 4 or 5 years that represented a change in the leadership of the company. And when we came on board, we took a fresh strategic look at Colfax and realized that it's easier to compound value if you're a less cyclical company. It doesn't mean that the business system and the approach doesn't work. It does work, but it's easier to sustain if you're in less cyclical businesses. As a result of that, we sold off the original part of the company, the Fluid Handling business. And then we ultimately sold off the Air & Gas Handling business. So we exited our 2 deeply cyclical capital goods companies and instead invested in a medical business, an orthopedic business, DJO. So as we sit here today, we've got the industrial business, fabrication technology. That still is cyclical, but shorter and shallower cycles, it being a short-cycle business, with the ability to produce great cash flow throughout a cycle. And you've got DJO, the orthopedic business, on the medical side. And the 2 of those businesses, we believe, are both capable of being $3 billion in revenue. ESAB, the primary brand of our FabTech business, is obviously closer to that. So you'll see us investing a lot more in the MedTech side, which last year had revenue of closer to $1.3 billion and with lots of opportunity for investment. If you go to the next slide, really, this is just a way of saying we've created a portfolio that is, COVID aside, more predictable with better performance characteristics. We've got better margins, better growth, better cash flow production. It's -- we now have these 2 conveyor belts of cash flow, which is really terrific, speaking not just as a CFO, but speaking as a -- from -- on behalf of the company that deploys its cash flow to build up its business platforms as part of the compounder strategy, lots of opportunities for investment. On Slide 6, this is just a brief introduction to our FabTech business. And I think the real message here is that we took a business that was significantly underperforming that was acquired in 2012, and we've built the innovation engine. We've improved the operating tempo in the business. We've built a terrific team of leaders around the world. And now we're really the only truly global welding and cutting business out there. We've been able to improve the margin significantly, improve the cash flow characteristics. And now we're arguably the best innovator in the industry last year with over 80 new products. So it's really that road map that we have in our mind a little bit as we acquired DJO, which is on Slide 7, an idea of a business that has a terrific presence with the market and had been embedded in private equity ownership for perhaps a little longer than it needed to be. And so we recognized the opportunity was to improve the operating tempo of the business and capabilities, be able then to serve customers better to regain the sort of natural entitlement to a market share and then to extend that with new products and innovation for even more competitive advantage and growth. And so a similar road map to what we did with our FabTech business, as we think we can apply to the MedTech business. And heading into COVID, we had taken a business that was underperforming and turned it around to where it was meeting market -- achieving at market levels or outperforming in every case. And we had the margins on an improving track and a good view of cash flow. And that's all waiting for us as we get through the other side of the pandemic. Slide 8 is an overview of the financial performance highlights. I think the material point here is that we got through the depths of COVID in April. We thought we'd see sequentially improving performance each month thereafter and then each quarter, and that's exactly how the second quarter played out. And we gave guidance for Q3 that suggested an improving sequential performance in Q3 as well. And along the way, we kept the business healthy, kept the cash flow positive even at the depths of COVID. And most importantly, we worked hard to keep our associates safe as well. And there's nothing that we've sacrificed for the future growth of the business. And frankly, nothing that structurally changed in our businesses as a result of COVID. Slide 9. We're close to wrapping up. But on Slide 9, this is a recovery scenario that we had been laying out for investors really since the Q1 call in early May. And this has largely held intact. And we focused on, again, the long-term drivers of the business not being disrupted by COVID. We knew that the Q2 would be a rough ride, and we knew that we'd see sequential improvement from that point on for different reasons. In the DJO business, the -- our MedTech platform, it's really driven by 2 key dynamics on the preventative and rehabilitative side. It's driven by return to general activity level, people being out in the world again and being active as well as organized sports and the follow-on effect from surgeries or the reconstructive part of the business. The reconstructive part is driven more by disease. And so that demand is always there. And it was initially impacted by policy decisions to limit access to elective surgeries. And that is -- that's all been largely restored. And now you see the industry working through the backlog of demand, which is benefiting the revenue levels in the business. On the FabTech side, the view is for a stronger economic performance in the developing parts of the world versus developed. Since we've got the only truly global platform, we're benefited by the demand -- the higher demand levels outside the United States and Europe. And we expect to see continued outperformance versus our peers given the better positioning that we have and, to some degree, also operating execution and innovation. But we do expect that the recovery will play out a little bit longer being less policy driven and somewhat more economically driven. And so just to wrap up on Slide 10. Look, the business that we had going into COVID, the outperformance versus peers, the clear line of sight to good cash flow production, good margin performance, healthy growth, good acquisition opportunities, all that's still there waiting for us as we -- as COVID abates. And every day, we get closer to resuming the momentum that we had there. We do have an M&A team that -- an effort that took a little bit of a break for the first couple of months of COVID but is now reengaged. And we think there's plenty of opportunity there that you'll hear us talk more about as we build these $2 billion to $3 billion platforms and continue to drive excellent financial performance. So with that, Josh, I'm going to open it up for questions.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#3

Perfect. Chris, appreciate that, and I'll keep an eye on the queue here from investors coming in. But I'll start it off. Maybe just give us a bit of an update on what you're seeing out there in more the traditional industrial markets, obviously, going to be more on the FabTech side of the portfolio. I think we've seen some of these industrial niches start to feel a bit more normal, not maybe back to 2019 levels. But we're building some momentum. People are going back to work and to the extent that most of what you do would be more kind of production-related than big heavy CapEx. Maybe some comments on how trends have progressed there and any observation how inventory might play a role in that as well.

Christopher Hix

executive
#4

Right. So for us, if you look at the depths of the downturn from COVID back in April, with the business -- industrial business was down about 28%. And then May had a little bit of a small recovery, and then June was even better from there, I think, down 20%. And so we gave guidance for Q3 that said that we'd be down kind of high single digits to mid-teens. And I think we gave some initial information about July being consistent with our view to drive that sort of level of performance. What was embedded in that was a belief that the developing parts of the world would recover a little bit more quickly. The disruption that we saw in Q2 oftentimes was more policy driven. For example, we had several countries that ordered all the businesses to be shut down for some period of time. I would contrast that with North America and Europe, where we expected to have the recovery lag the developing parts of the world, just given the -- some of the unique drivers in those markets, whether they were automotive or oil and gas or other drivers. So that's the picture that we painted going in, would be sequential improvement as we go from Q2 into Q3 and likely into Q4, as you do see the world returning to healthier levels. But we didn't make a call that you'd see a full-blown return to growth. Now we do think there's a lot of positive indicators that are out there. But generally, the industrial recessions take a little bit longer to correct. And then with respect to inventory, our industrial business is short cycle. It has a pretty lean distribution network, and our customers have learned to be lean as well. So generally, we don't have a big inventory buffer that can cause a lot of disruption at the front end of a change in the cycle or during the recovery phase.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#5

Got it. And I guess maybe just one more on the industrial side of the house before we pivot to DJO. I think the notion that you're going to see more kind of regionalized manufacturing activity, near-shoring or whatever you want to call it, reexamination of supply chain, certainly seems to be getting a lot of discussion momentum. Tell me how Colfax would win in that scenario. Or how do you think you'd be positioned for kind of a bigger return to activity in, we'll call it North America, not just the U.S.?

Christopher Hix

executive
#6

So for us, Josh, I know you know this, our FabTech business is very much a regional business, where we are making much of the product in the regions in which we're selling. And the result of that is that you're not dragging a lot of heavy materials around the world, which is inefficient and costly. So to a large degree, the -- a change in politics or tariffs or a view of onshoring or offshoring is less likely to have a material impact on our Fabrication Technology business. Having said that, we're always examining our supply chain in a continuous improvement light, which causes us to think about how we consolidate our footprint, where is the best place for us to produce a product because you can't make everything everywhere and then just to drive further efficiencies. But we don't expect that the current onshoring has a big driver on our, let's say, the way we do business. Now it may have an impact on customers, which I think is the nature of your question, which is if there's more onshoring that happens, let's say, in North America, that could drive more demand in North America. Now as a globally positioned business and really, the only ones in the industry that have the sort of footprint that we have being everywhere, we would expect that we would be less disrupted by that. So we'd have to see how that would play out for us specifically.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#7

Got it. And then just turning over to the DJO side. I guess how have electric procedures been trending? You mentioned a backlog that needed to get worked down in the second half. I think a lot of the industrial folks who are listening are probably less tuned into some of those health care trends. But yes, how has that been working? And where do we stand on that backlog reduction?

Christopher Hix

executive
#8

Yes. So for the most part, the -- so for us, elective -- let me back up here. So the business has the 2 pieces, the preventative and rehabilitation. And maybe about 1/4 of that roughly is tethered to surgical outcomes or surgical procedures. The reconstructive part is almost entirely tied to that. And so it's that part of the business, the reconstructive part, where the elective surgery slowdown was felt most acutely. And -- but also, the recovery has been very rapid. So at this -- and that business is largely for us in the U.S. The other part of the business, we have a pretty good presence throughout Europe and some other countries. In the United States, elective surgeries have been largely switched on completely and have been for a little while. And so now you do have this working down a backlog that's happening. We call these elective surgeries, but these aren't faceless. These are people living with chronic pain and immobility, and they need these surgeries to get back to life and to lead a healthy and productive life. And so there's a big demand for that. The backlog is getting worked down. On the other hand, there's still a reluctance among a small minority of the population to reenter the health care system. And so it's really those 2 countervailing forces that are at work here as we're going through the third quarter with some improvement in sales for us coming from the demand -- the backlog work down, on the other hand, not necessarily seeing the full return of patients into the system yet. And I think -- I suspect we'll be talking more about that as we reflect on the third quarter and talk about the fourth quarter. But largely, this part of the business -- you'll recall, in general, we said MedTech would be flat to down mid-single digits in the third quarter. So that suggests a pretty healthy and rapid recovery that we'd expect to see this quarter and then carry that momentum into Q4 and beyond.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#9

Got it. So that reduction or conversion of that backlog is kind of consistent with the way you guys had thought about it.

Christopher Hix

executive
#10

Yes. We understood that, that dynamic would be very much in play in the third quarter.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#11

Got it. And then I guess the bigger chunk of DJO about -- around rehabilitation prevention, just given that recreation activity, organized sports are still a little depressed, how has that kind of trended versus your thought? And do we need every gym to be open and every little league team to be out on the field for this business to get back to normal? Or is that kind of working its way back to normal as well?

Christopher Hix

executive
#12

Well, certainly, that part of the business, again, the preventative and rehabilitative part of the business versus the reconstructive or surgical base, that part of the business is very much tethered to general activity levels in the population, organized sports, to a lesser degree, employment levels. And if any of that is lagging, then I would argue that we're not quite back to normal. Now having said that, we've got this fast-growing reconstructive business, which in combination with the preventive and rehabilitative, which maybe is not hitting on all cylinders for market demand, you put those together and it still gives us the ability to talk about flat to down, only mid-single digits in the third quarter. So all of that was part of our thinking as we went into the third quarter and gave our guidance. We didn't expect to see everything returning to normal in the fall with fall sports and -- at the high school, junior high, college level, et cetera. We knew it would be a little bit choppy, and we're all sort of watching how this thing plays out together. But the business is well positioned, especially relative to most, as you think about most industrial businesses, which are struggling to find growth. And this is a business that's pretty rapidly getting back toward previous demand levels.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#13

Right. I guess taking a step back on kind of the broader refresh and the change in ownership on DJO. What do customers like or dislike as that business has evolved and come together over the last 5 years as a portfolio? And what do you see as kind of the biggest changes that have been made under Colfax' ownership that have been big wins or still remain kind of areas of opportunity?

Christopher Hix

executive
#14

So here's what attracted us, as we did our strategic review back in 2017 and identified some really good vectors, noncyclical businesses that we could sort of build a new portfolio around, and this was one of them. It wasn't the only one, but it was one of them. And we did a lot of work on it. And what we found was a fundamentally sound business with a really strong brand in the marketplace and pockets of really good innovation. And as we dug in during our diligence, I think we pretty quickly zeroed in on the fact that the operational tempo in the business was far less than what it needed to be. We heard that from customers. We saw it with our own eyes during visits. And we recognize that, that would be a really good opportunity to get after quickly because then it gives you quicker access to your natural share of the customer's wallet, let's say. So that was an area of opportunity. We also recognized longer-term that the business had done a really good job investing in innovation on the reconstructive part. But on the rehabilitative and preventative, that, that had lagged a bit. Now it had gotten restarted under the current -- the business leaders, the CEO's leadership, but we knew that it would take more investment really in process first. Now other people think you just put money in and all that, but it's really about building a solid process. And then you can incrementally invest to drive better outcomes, just as we've done in the Fabrication Technology business. So to bring it all home, we invested a lot on the operational side in 2019. We got the business back to a healthier place much quicker than I think most investors thought we would. And now what we want to do is make sure that we sustain the improvements we've made. We battle our way through COVID, which obviously has some friction associated with it from an operational standpoint, and then we can -- then we just get continuously better from there and then work more and more every day on the innovation side of the house, while we start to bring in some nice bolt-on acquisitions. So we think that there's a difference in vision. We think that's where CBS matters, bringing a business system, a process orientation, a discipline to the business that, frankly, I think the leadership team and the associates of DJO responded very well to.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#15

Got it. And you mentioned M&A in there. I think there was a small deal announced last week or so by Stryker for ankle reconstruction, flew a little bit under the radar for Colfax. But anything you can share with us on that deal, size, profitability, terms, just anything to kind of give people a sense for the types of deals you're looking at and perhaps the size, just given that there's still a decent amount of balance sheet leverage?

Christopher Hix

executive
#16

Sure. So we're put in an unusual position here to talk about a transaction that's not completed yet. But we were named by the U.K. regulatory authorities as the counterparty on the sale of part of the business there. I think -- look, it's not a very large transaction. But I think it'll signal well to investors about the range of opportunities that are out there and the fact that we are in the game and that we can find these attractive opportunities to further build out in the platform. So we're excited about this. We think it represents a terrific investment and a natural extension, in our view, of the very successful and fast-growing reconstructive part of DJO.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#17

Is there a good amount of fragmentation in that space? Because I think, again, from kind of my ignorant industrial view, it seems like there's a lot of big boys in that space. Is it a sense -- is it a matter of kind of carving out some of these pieces that are floating around in bigger portfolios? Are there kind of smaller businesses to be rolled up? Maybe help us contextualize that landscape, especially for folks who maybe aren't as familiar with the market.

Christopher Hix

executive
#18

Sure. So this is a very fragmented space, as it turns out. I would contrast that with knees and hips, for example, that are very well-established markets, that have few players in them. If you look at the extremities, these are markets that -- there's a lot of evolving technology in. There's a lot of smaller players in. There's a lot of opportunity to make further investment in that -- in the extremities.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#19

Got it. And then I guess just taking a step back on larger M&A, what level of leverage would you consider to be kind of the all clear for bigger deals?

Christopher Hix

executive
#20

So we've -- it's interesting. If you go back and look, we've operated as a company with different levels of leverage. We've been over 4 before and got it back down, and we've -- and then operated in more of the 2 to 3x zone, which we've identified as being more of our sweet spot. It doesn't mean you can't live above that for a while as long as you have strategic intent and a good road map for how you get down over time, and you probably don't want to live below that for too long either for other reasons. But we've got a clear path and ability for us to make investments while also driving the leverage of the company. Now near term, as we're working through COVID, the leverage levels are tipping up a little bit. We communicated that we expect by year-end, we'll be around 4.5x or so. But that's really carrying a lot of depressed EBITDA with us. So as EBITDA recovers, as we -- as COVID continues to abate, you'll see us quickly get back to healthier leverage levels and, at the same time, have that dual path of investing and deleveraging.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#21

Got it. And then just kind of sticking with that side of the house for a second. Is there a relationship at all with the insurance companies or any kind of regulators in some of the geographies you operate that makes you either kind of an easier rollup candidate or makes it slightly harder? Is that -- does that confound the relationship? Again, kind of a dynamic you don't see in some of the other markets that Colfax has historically participated in or most other folks would look at.

Christopher Hix

executive
#22

Yes. That's fair. It's interesting. If you look at our industrial business and our medical business, the further away from the customer you get, the more similar they look. And in fact, there's a lot of idea sharing and skill sharing that we've done between the businesses at the production level and sourcing. And there's opportunities for other back-office opportunities that we can explore and work together on. But one of the things that is different between them is the regulatory nature of the MedTech business the closer you get to the customer. Many of us have had exposure to the medical industry in the past. And so we went in with eyes wide open. And it is a factor that you've got to manage. And that's why there's a level of regulatory oversight and investment in Colfax today and in the MedTech business today that Colfax would not have traditionally had. So we try to be smart about that, and we try to make sure we've got the right investment, the right training for all of our associates. I don't think it affects the longer-term investment opportunities or the way we operate the business -- intend to operate going forward. But we do have to be very mindful of the regulatory requirements of the industry.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#23

Got it. And then just thinking about margins, and I guess this pertains mostly to FabTech since there's probably an easier path for DJO to get back to normal. How should we think about a return to 2019 margins? I mean, 2019 margins in FabTech were pretty exceptional relative to the business' history, particularly when you first bought it. What types of levels of demand do we need to see to get back to those levels of profitability? Is there still enough structural costs left to get there at a level that's shy of '19?

Christopher Hix

executive
#24

It's interesting because we've -- this is a question that we've addressed with folks over time in different demand environments. And so it deserves to be asked. It deserves to be answered. And the answer tends to be fairly similar in that the path for us for margin improvement and -- which on our EBITA metric, the target is, let's say, 16.5%, the path to get there is a combination of operating leverage and the cost work that we can do in the business and, to a lesser degree, M&A, which provides -- can provide a little bit more margin improvement potential there. And so it really depends. The more growth we get, the less we need to flex on the cost side. And the less growth, the more we flex on the cost side. There's still plenty of opportunity for us to manage the global footprint that we have. We're still fragmented in some markets where we -- the footprint can be further consolidated. And there's opportunities for us to rationalize the overall cost structure even in the back office. So there's still plenty of opportunity for us to manage our way through that. We just want to do it in a way that is not disruptive to the business, not disruptive to customers and the customer relationships. But we do think that there's a path forward for us to continue to expand margins. And then once we get to our 16.5% EBITA target, then the reward for that is to pick an even bigger target. And that's what we're paid to do in a continuous improvement culture.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#25

Understood. I see that we're out of time. Chris, thanks so much for making the time to join us. Good to see your face. Hope you're staying safe and healthy. And hope to see you again on the beach next year in Laguna.

Christopher Hix

executive
#26

Very good, Josh. Thanks again.

Joshua Pokrzywinski

analyst
#27

Thanks, Chris. Be well.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Enovis Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Enovis Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.