Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

June 1, 2021

NASDAQ US Health Care conference_presentation 28 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#1

Good morning. My name is Brian Weinstein, and I'm the group head of life sciences here at William Blair & Company, and I'm responsible for coverage of Exact Sciences. Before we really get started, I am required to inform you that for a complete list of research disclosures or potential conflicts, to visit our website at williamblair.com. Logistically, the format is a fireside chat between me and management that will last for about 30 minutes. We have a set of questions prepared, which we will get through. But if you have a question, you can try and submit it by typing it into the question box that I think is provided. We will do our best to keep an eye out for it, but I can't guarantee that we'll be able to get to it in the time allotted. With that, let's jump in. We're fortunate to have a couple of very big Chicago Bear fans with us this morning, the company's CEO, President and Chairman, Kevin Conroy; as well as the company's Executive Vice President, CFO, and now COO, Jeff Elliott as well. We have Brian Baranick joining us, company's SVP for Strategy and Business Development on the line as well. I don't know his NFL affiliation though, so I can't mock him there. Thanks for taking time to join us, guys. I appreciate it.

Kevin Conroy

executive
#2

Brian, it's great to be here. I wish we could be with you in Chicago. And you are wrong, I am a Detroit Lions fan having grown up in Michigan. I have yet to see a Super Bowl title, but I assure you that we will. I think there's a chance we could get Aaron Rogers. We're looking forward to that date.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#3

Very good. I appreciate that. Well, I thought we could start with -- just having to give an overview of the company really, how it's evolved over the last many years, but really also what the vision is today for where the business is going. So again, maybe a 5- to 10-minute overview for people who just aren't as familiar or who have not really kept up with all the news flow of the company over the last couple of years.

Kevin Conroy

executive
#4

Brian, a lot of people think of us as the Cologuard company, and we are that, and we're that and a lot more. As you know, we acquired Genomic Health, which has Oncotype DXpress standard of care for early -- certain early-stage breast cancers. And it is -- that was the first step in building a broad capability to be the complete solution for advanced cancer diagnostics. And when you think about what we have built and what we are building, it is all focused on making sure that we're the 1 company that physicians broadly think about when they think about addressing oncology from a diagnostic perspective, all the way from screening, eventually hereditary cancer testing, all the way to therapy selection, minimum residual disease testing. So the full suite of tests built upon an incredible IT infrastructure -- we're based on the Epic platform -- that gives us the ability to connect with physicians across the U.S. and then ultimately, utilize that data to provide incredible insights. So testing is an important part of this, but the story goes well beyond that. And the foundation that we have built is best-in-class research and development, science, clinical, regulatory, sales and marketing, over 1,000 people in that organization. The ability to provide unbelievable customer service, an international team of over 100 people and a highly -- a team that services people in 99 countries around the world. Again, Genomic Health was the turning point for this expansion. 98% of oncologists have ordered at least 1 Genomic Health test. And all of the learnings that we have applied or that we have gained from bringing Cologuard to market, we will use in what may be the biggest opportunity to diminish and potentially some day eradicate the negative impacts of cancer is through the Thrive acquisition and the multi-cancer test coupled with the work that we have done with Mayo Clinic. And so multi-cancer testing is critically important to changing cancer outcomes. By doing a simple blood draw and moving cancer detection earlier before symptoms, we have the ability, potentially, to lead to better outcomes than any therapy that's under development today. And that's important, and it's also an important building block of this overall ecosystem that we're building. Know that if you're under 85 years old, the #1 cause of death is cancer in the U.S. And by screening a broad population of over 100 million people, let's say, age 50 and older; potentially 45 and older for cancer broadly, we have the ability then to stage shift to earlier stage. And typically, about 9 in 10 people diagnosed Stage 1 survive versus about 1 in 10 diagnosed late stage. Frequently, with early detection, surgery alone is curative versus late stage when we know there's multiple surgeries and multiple chemotherapies and targeted therapies, et cetera. That's where we're going as a company. We think we're uniquely in the position to show this leadership and actually pull it through and have the outcomes that we want to see. And so that's our mission, it's about cancer eradication, and we've stayed true to that mission for a very long time.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#5

That's great. And we're definitely going to dig into a lot of the different programs and projects that you have in a few moments here, but thanks for that overview. We are asking each of the companies attending kind of a set of questions around various topics, including recent trends, key catalysts and some things on ESG as well. So let's just try and knock those down, and then we'll get back into kind of the the broader topics that you were talking about.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#6

So starting with recent trends, as we sit here in early June, and it's hard to believe it is early June already in the year, but maybe you can provide some sort of an update on how things are recovering across your business lines and maybe some thoughts on expectations for how you would expect things to trend throughout the year. Jeff, maybe that's 1 for you, I don't know.

Jeffrey Elliott

executive
#7

Brian, in Q1, we had very, very strong results. Overall, revenue grew 16%. That's despite the pandemic in a very challenging backdrop. In the Cologuard business, revenue grew 10%. When you think of what's happened over the past year, colon cancer screening down significantly because of the pandemic. In Q1, colon cancer -- colonoscopy is down 10% to 20%. Wellness visit's down under 10% to 20%. Salesforce access down at least 50%. So despite that backdrop to grow 10%, that shows just those the underlying momentum that Cologuard has. Then when you look ahead to the balance of the year, things are still a little choppy out there. The pandemic is still here, wellness tests is still depressed. Our reps are now getting back out there more fully and making sure they educate physicians on how Cologuard fits in. So we're pleased with the momentum we have. What this really sets up is for even better, longer-term growth. We think we'll get to our longer-term target of at least 40% market share even sooner because of the pandemic. Because the pandemic has led us to take actions to go out and accelerate adoption, things like electronic ordering have improved significantly over the past year, in part, because of the pandemic. So pleased by how the team has performed despite a very challenging backdrop.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#8

Got it. And your comment there, your teams are getting -- your sales reps are getting into the field in an increasing amount in terms of how often they're able to see clinicians. Is that -- can you just talk about historically the amount of correlation between sales calls and Cologuard ordering? As we think about a post-pandemic world, is that relationship still as tight? And is the sales force getting back into the field in a higher degree? What type of leading indicator is that? How strong of a leading indicator do you think that is, Jeff?

Jeffrey Elliott

executive
#9

Well, the teams out in the field are historically one of the most important ways to launch new product and educate physicians on its key attributes. Over the past year, our reps have really been out of the field most of the time. And our partner, Pfizer, has been out of the field entirely up until last week. So again, to deliver year-on-year growth despite that, I'm very proud of. The correlation here is very, very strong. Historically, before the pandemic, we would talk about the number of sales calls in a quarter. If a rep talk to a provider at least 6x in a quarter, you would see a 9x increase in orders for that provider relative to the doctor that we didn't talk to. So there's a very strong correlation. The beauty of this product is the market is so incredibly large. There's over 100 million people in the colon cancer screening market, so having a rep talk to a physician out in the field is a very important way to help get more people screened. As far as leading indicators, yes, getting reps out there is an important leading indicator. It's not going to happen overnight, it takes time to go and have repeat conversations with the physician. And still, a significant number of physicians have limited access. So it's going to take some time. I think things will continue to normalize over the course of this year. As far as getting back to normal, I don't think that happens until at least next year, because, look, the pandemic is still here. There's still over 10,000 people being diagnosed every day in this country.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#10

Got it. Okay. Just switching gears for a second here. I wanted to ask you about supply chain. It seems like every week, we hear about some issues somewhere in the world with supply chain. Most recently, I think chlorine tablets for pools are now -- you can't get those. So I just wanted to check with you guys about your supply chain and if you've seen any issues emerging for your business or anything that you're keeping your eye on in the coronary there as pricing pressure, right? Are you seeing any kind of pricing pressure on your inputs? And as you think about your potential inflationary environment, how does that affect the way that you guys go about managing your business?

Jeffrey Elliott

executive
#11

Well, Brian, this is something we watch very, very closely. Obviously, as a health care company, we have to put the patient first, and we do. So the teams have noticed over the past year, there are certain things that have become more limited, things like PPE equipment, rubber gloves and gowns. There's been times when those have been more limited. Over as of today, the team has done a nice job. We've got sufficient safety stock or supply availability such that our supply chain is very robust at the moment. As the pandemic has started to abate, you've seen availability improve. From an inflation standpoint, inflation is always there. The team is doing a nice job managing it. A lot of our key suppliers have no inflation hedges built in, so we've done a good job of managing those costs. When you look at Cologuard over time, I expect us to work down that cost per test. My longer-term goal is to get that down to at least $100 or better on a cost per test basis, and the team we have in place is doing a very nice job of managing to that.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#12

Got it. And I know there's a lot of drivers there that are going to help you get to that $100 or better, and I'm hopeful that we'll have time to kind of dig into those here in a moment. I want to pivot real quickly to ESG for a second if we could. I know it's not an area that the industry has really talked about broadly at this point, but I know that you guys are a forward-thinking company and leaning into a lot of initiatives like this, so I was hoping that you could provide update for people who are really focused on that. And we know that there's an increasing number of investors who are increasingly focused on that. So any thoughts that you have on where you guys sit on ESG at this point?

Jeffrey Elliott

executive
#13

Brian, ESG is core to who we are. It's in our DNA. I mean we are a health care company serving patients. Take Cologuard, for example. Cologuard is helping solve the problem of colon cancer. Colon cancer is known as the most preventable, but least prevented cancer. We've helped screen over 6 million people for this deadly disease. So again, it's core to who we are. When you look at all of our new facilities that we've brought online to manage this robust expansion of growth, all of our new facilities that have come online are LEED-certified. That includes our lab processing, which is a significant investment. The lab we have today for Cologuard can process over 7 million tests per year, and growing. So we take this very seriously. From a governance standpoint, integrity is core to governance. Integrity is one of our core values at Exact, and it's something we take very seriously from the Board on down. So ESG is core to who we are.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#14

Thank you for that. I think people will certainly appreciate the answer. If we can move to catalysts now and things that you think investors should be focused on over the next 6 to 12 months, I mean, what would you point to as really the set of catalysts across your business? And how would you characterize kind of the magnitude of the catalysts as you see them in terms of importance?

Jeffrey Elliott

executive
#15

Well, Brian, on the Cologuard business, returning that product to a more normal environment is key. With the reps now returning to the field in a bigger way, that will help growth over time. Also on the pipeline, Kevin talked about, this is -- we're entering what I think is probably the most robust period in company history as far as bringing new products to patients. So just this year alone, we brought our liver test out. We made that available for the first time. We'll have a more full launch over the next couple of years. Later this year, we expect significant data out of our pipeline. Starting with our colon blood test, we expect to release data either later this year or perhaps early next year. As you know, Brian, we're also running our study for Cologuard 2.0, which is an enhanced version of an already very good test. That same study will serve as a registrational study for our colon blood test. We expect enrollment to complete later this year, with the data readout at some point next year. Multi-cancer, huge new opportunity for Exact Sciences and for patients. We are running multiple case-control studies this year to refine that assay. Later this year, we'll run our final validation case control study and publish that data again later this year or next year. When you look ahead to next year then, we plan to publish -- we plan to launch the prospective pivotal study for our multi-cancer test. So this is a very robust period of catalyst for both the core business in Cologuard and Oncotype as well as bringing new products to market.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#16

Perfect. Thank you for that. Digging into some of those topics that you just brought up, maybe we can just talk about your product in colon cancer using blood as the sample type. There's a lot going on in that space right now, and I thought maybe you wanted to spend a couple of minutes just on how you think that landscape evolves and what your expectations are for your product in terms of performance, but more broadly, what you think about performance that you'll see across the space. And I know I'm throwing a lot at you here on this topic, but then I also want to kind of get your viewpoint on how you think a product like that fits into the broader screening paradigm. Investors have said to us that they are concerned about does that cannibalize Cologuard, either existing Cologuard users or the opportunity to bring people from colonoscopy, FIT or unscreened, into the mix? So a lot there, but maybe just spend a few minutes talking broadly about that space.

Kevin Conroy

executive
#17

Thanks, Brian. This -- the blood-based screening has the potential to have a positive impact on the mission of eradicating colon cancer. Your starting point is 1 out of 3 people in the screening population over the age of 50 aren't screened at all, and almost nobody aged 45 to 49 is screened unless they have a family history. So there is the need for more screening. Colonoscopy is a great screening approach, but it is -- it has limitations, and part of the limitation is just capacity. So there are about 45 million Americans in the screening population that aren't screened today. It's clear that a multitude of approaches is going to be the right answer. We believe that Cologuard is going to continue to have better -- much better performance than a blood-based test. And because of that, we believe that Cologuard will continue to grow; and B, the true alternative to colonoscopy. One of the great advantages of Cologuard is that you only need to do it every 3 years. A blood-based test, the way the modeling works, is likely to be an annual test. And so as an annual test, you need to keep that false positive really low because that compounds over time. And with the data that we've seen out there, that's a concern. When you go into a prospective study, it tends to put downward pressure on the specificity of the test, and trying to keep that at a 95-ish percent specificity is probably where it needs to be, to be effective. Because the blood-based tests, there's no reliable data showing the ability to pick up precancerous polyps, which the precancerous polyp find rate is very critical to saving lives over the long term because you're finding to remove the polyp -- advance adenoma before it becomes cancer. And so that will be a limitation of a blood-based test. With that said, blood-based testing is going to have a role. The question is how significant of a role? One data point is in our large prospective study, significantly more people are willing to do Cologuard, about 25% more, than are willing to get a blood draw. And that is because stool-based testing is pretty darn easy. You do it in the privacy of your own home. With blood-based testing, you have to go schedule an appointment to get your blood drawn, and you have to get poked with the needle. And a lot of people don't want to do either of those 2 things. So we believe it's going to be an important part. It's going to probably, I think, mature at 10% to 15% of all colon cancer screenings versus, we think, the rest will be split between Cologuard and colonoscopy over the long haul.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#18

That's great detail there. Thank you for that. You've said, Kevin, many times in various forms that the data that you guys have been able to generate is as good, if not better, than what you've seen from others in the space. I know we'll see that data, Jeff, I think you were saying later this year, early next year, if I heard you correct just now. But just directionally, do you still believe that you'll have kind of the highest performing blood-based test in the market?

Kevin Conroy

executive
#19

We do. That's grounded in the fact that we have amazing science and amazing scientists that have been doing this for a very long time. And we're very eyes wide open about the difference between a case-control study and the biases that can creep into that versus a prospective study. So we are very happy with the work that the team has done here in partnership with the Mayo Clinic. We're very confident about where our data will mature in a prospective setting.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#20

And just to round out on this topic, you just mentioned again the concept of blood-based testing and annual test. Not only is that important from a patient standpoint, but also, it really changes the dynamics around the economics of the test as well, right? I think that you've talked about a pricing for this test somewhere kind of in that $150 to $200 range. I just want to confirm that that's what you're thinking there. But beyond that, what would a blood test have to show in terms of performance in order to not be used on an annual basis and to be thought of more like Cologuard? Is it truly Cologuard-like performance?

Kevin Conroy

executive
#21

Yes, sure. It's 90% plus sensitivity across all 4 stages. And importantly, Cologuard detects 90% of Stage I cancers in a prospective setting, that case control in a prospective setting, and 42% of all precancerous polyps with about 70% detection of the largest pre-cancerous polyps. So that's a starting point to get to a 3-year interval. And these models exist, so those who are developing tests can actually pump the data through the model to see what sensitivity and specificity would generate a 3-year outcome. That is certainly what the guideline groups do. And so it's important for us, as we think about this, what is our blood-based test going to be? An annual test, a 2-year test or a 3-year test? It's hard to move it to anything other than a 1-year test like the FIT test is without better advanced adenoma detection and Stage I cancer sensitivity.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#22

And that pricing level that you guys talked about in the past, that's still where you're thinking about potentially for this product? I mean...

Kevin Conroy

executive
#23

Yes. The current Medicare code for the blood-based test that is available is just under $200. Where that matures out with an FDA-approved next-generation, if you will, blood-based colon cancer screening test, we'll see. I suspect it will be in that $150 to $200 range. And that puts a lot of pressure on making sure that you have a test that is built with cost in mind if it's going to be an annual test.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#24

Yes. Understood. I don't really have a handful of minutes remaining, and we could spend hours talking about these topics, but I do want to get some thoughts on just in general, how you see the landscape playing out in precision oncology. We have so many people in the space or coming into the space and even some of the biggest names in diagnostics haven't even entered this space yet, and I would think would over time. So how do you see it all coming together? And what do you think will differentiate winners from losers across precision oncology? And I'm thinking the way that you set it up at the beginning, I think people think precision oncology is just therapy selection sometimes, but I'm thinking about it across the entire spectrum. From screening to therapy selection to recurrence and monitoring. How do you think that space ultimately plays out?

Kevin Conroy

executive
#25

I think that's a great question for Brian.

Brian Baranick

executive
#26

Thanks, Kevin. Thanks, Brian, for the question. I think we've already touched on some of the differentiators that Exact Sciences brings to the table. I think about differentiators as our people, also our infrastructure. So we believe quite strongly that a company that's going to ultimately succeed in precision oncology will bring the full suite of tests to the patient. And we share the mission in eradicating cancer. So when we think about are you at risk of cancer to do you have cancer to you've gone through surgical resection, hopefully, successfully and we'll bring MRD in disease recurrence, for those unfortunate, you who go on to have the recurrence, we have the therapy selection tools and the therapy response monitoring tools that we are developing. So I think it's that full suite of tests that are offered by one company that will ultimately lead to success for us.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#27

Yes. Got it. It's a good answer. So as we sort of think about going back to the multi-cancer discussion that we had and your enthusiasm around what that could ultimately bring, and we do share that enthusiasm, I'm curious about your view of that market and what you guys will bring in terms of differentiation versus others that are trying to enter that space as well, right? There's a lot of money being pumped in there. Obviously, GRAIL has data out there. We don't know where that's going to ultimately end up, that asset. But how do you think about how you guys will differentiate yourselves from others in this space as we think about multi-cancer?

Kevin Conroy

executive
#28

Why don't you take that, too, Brian?

Brian Baranick

executive
#29

Happy to you, Kevin. I think there's a real opportunity, Brian, for us to set True North in terms of what doing things the right way looks like in terms of evidence building, running the right clinical trial and then bringing the best test to the market. And I think the experience that we had with Cologuard will allow us to do that. When I think doing things the right way, it's running the right studies, having the test FDA-approved and really rolling out what we think will be best-in-class. So when we think about mutations, proteins, methylation markers and even other future markers that we might want to layer in to improve performance, I think there's an opportunity to have more than 1 company in this space. The market is very, very large. But ultimately, the people who do things the right way and bring the best test to the market should be positioned well in a very large market opportunity.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#30

Another good answer. Thank you so much for that, Brian. I appreciate that. Honestly, I can spend hours going through all of this stuff, and we had to keep this at a high level. So as much as I'd love to dig into all of this as well as get thoughts on Aaron Rodgers and Justin Fields, and why Justin Fields will be the best quarterback in the north this year, we do have to end it there, unfortunately. But I want to thank you guys for taking time out of your day to spend some time with us going over the vision for the business and getting into some product-specific details. So thank you so much, guys.

Kevin Conroy

executive
#31

Thanks, Brian.

Jeffrey Elliott

executive
#32

Thanks, Brian.

Brian Weinstein

analyst
#33

Okay, guys. Take care. Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Exact Sciences Corporation transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Exact Sciences Corporation earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.