ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation (XOM) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 31, 2026
What were the key takeaways from ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's July 31, 2026 earnings call?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, ExxonMobil (XOM:US) reported robust earnings of $14.5 billion and cash flow from operations of $23.6 billion, despite a 10% reduction in upstream production due to ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. The company highlighted record production volumes in non-Middle East regions, particularly in Guyana and the Permian Basin, signaling strong operational resilience and strategic execution. Management maintained a positive outlook, indicating that free cash flow is expected to double by 2030 compared to 2025 levels, driven by enhanced operational efficiencies and production optimization strategies.
What topics did ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation cover?
- Record Production Volumes: ExxonMobil achieved its highest production volumes in over two decades in Energy Products, with the Permian Basin producing more than 1.8 million oil equivalent barrels per day. Management noted, "our focus remains on value, not volume," emphasizing the strategic approach to production.
- Guyana Development Success: The Guyana project continues to exceed expectations, with production volumes reaching approximately 900,000 barrels per day. Darren Woods stated, "the success of this development has set a new standard for the industry," highlighting accelerated recovery of investments.
- Refining Margins and Production: ExxonMobil's refining operations faced challenges but still delivered strong results, with record diesel production amid tight global supply. Management noted, "we think we're going to continue to see a very robust refining market with very high margins," indicating confidence in future performance.
- Structural Cost Savings: The company reported cumulative structural cost savings of $16.3 billion since 2019, with a goal of reaching $20 billion by 2030. Management emphasized that they are "holding cash costs flat" despite inflationary pressures, showcasing operational efficiency.
- Shareholder Returns: ExxonMobil returned over $9 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in the quarter, reflecting strong cash flow generation and commitment to returning capital. This aligns with their strategy to maintain one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry.
What were ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation's July 31, 2026 results?
- Revenue: $77.5B (vs $75B est, +10% YoY)
- Earnings Per Share (EPS): $3.50 (beat by $0.20)
- Cash Flow from Operations: $23.6B (vs $21B est, +12% YoY)
- Free Cash Flow: $17B (vs $15B est, +13% YoY)
- Net Debt Reduction: $7B (vs $5B target)
- Upstream Production: 3.5M BOE/day (down 10% YoY due to Middle East disruptions)
ExxonMobil's strong quarterly performance underscores its operational resilience amid geopolitical challenges, positioning the company favorably for future growth. Investors should monitor developments in Guyana, refining margins, and geopolitical risks as potential catalysts or headwinds impacting the stock.
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
James Chapman
executiveGood morning, everyone. Welcome to ExxonMobil's earnings call. Today's call is being recorded. We appreciate you joining us. I'm Jim Chapman, and I'm joined by Darren Woods, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Neil Hansen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. This quarter's presentation and prerecorded remarks are available on the Investors section of our website. They're meant to accompany this quarter's earnings release, which is posted in the same location. During today's presentation, we'll make forward-looking remarks, including comments on our long-term plans, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Please read our cautionary statement on Slide 2. You can find more information on the risks and uncertainties that apply to any forward-looking statements in our SEC filings on our website. We also provide supplemental information at the end of our earnings slides, which are also posted on our website. And now I'll turn it over to Darren for opening remarks.
Darren Woods
executiveGood morning, and thank you for joining us. Unfortunately, as all of you are aware, the conflict in the Middle East continued to the second quarter, impacting our employees, partners and operations in the region. I want to begin this morning by recognizing the service of the men, women engaged in the conflict and the hardships being endured and losses suffered by those in the region. They remain at the forefront of our thoughts, and we continue to pray for a quick resolution. As a company, we remain committed to mitigating the global impact by maximizing production and providing the energy and products essential to modern life. While we didn't anticipate the current situation, we were prepared for it. And our markets disruption is inevitable, establishing globally diverse production at scale, across value chains, built on a foundation of durable advantages provides a robust platform for creating value through price cycles and market disruptions. The second quarter demonstrates the strength of our approach. Despite the temporary loss of approximately 10% of our upstream production, we delivered exceptional financial results, including industry-leading earnings of $14.5 billion and cash flow from operations of $23.6 billion. Performance was strong across the company. In the Upstream, excluding the Middle East, we delivered our highest production volumes in more than 2 decades in Energy Products, our integrated U.S. Gulf Coast refining operations ran reliably as global diesel supply tightened. The business delivered record second quarter diesel production, helping meet market needs. In Chemical Products, our North American facilities with advantaged feed and record first half reliability, helped meet the shortfall in supply caused by disruptions in the Middle East, driving a roughly 180% increase in chemical product margins versus the first quarter. In Specialty Products, our integrated approach down the value chain, reformulation capabilities, global footprint and strong execution, help meet customer needs despite significant supply challenges, delivering best-ever basestock margins and record quarterly and first half adjusted earnings. Guyana remains one of the clearest examples of our advantaged growth. In the quarter, Guyana delivered gross production volumes of approximately 900,000 barrels per day. [indiscernible], our fifth SPSO, set sale toward Guyana in June and remains on track for start-up by the end of the year, the next major step in Guyana's continued development. Long tail is on the path toward final investment decision, and we are evaluating the potential for FPSO. The success of this development has set a new standard for the industry and frankly, has exceeded our own expectations, delivering on tight schedules at industry-leading cost with strong reliability and optimized production as a result of recovering our capital and cost nearly 2 years earlier than anticipated, increasing NPV and desaturating the cost bank. This is great news. But as a result, our volume entitlements will change as reflected in our 2030 plan. As always, our focus remains on value, not volume. Turning to the Permian. This quarter, we set another production record of more than 1.8 million oil equivalent barrels per day. More importantly, we continue to improve recovery and lower capital costs through new technologies deployed at scale. Our industry-leading acreage position supports extended reach development. including 4-mile laterals to drive superior capital efficiency. In the first half of the year, we drilled more than 80 4-mile wells, supported by our Houston-based remote operations center in real-time data that helps ensure safe, efficient and effective execution. During the quarter, we had to work through some complex conditions. Logistics were tight, supply chains were constrained and customers were short of critical products. Our global trading and supply chain organization put our new operating model to work, optimizing feedstock and product placement, balancing supply across regions and responding to localized disruptions. Those actions kept our operations running and customers supplied. It helped avoid roughly $750 million in annual disruption costs through advanced modeling, fleet reallocations product reformulations and alternate supply sources. At the same time, we continue to make progress on our transformation. On July 1, we integrated upstream operations into our global operations organization, bringing together approximately 31,000 employees across more than 150 sites in 48 countries. This is an industry-first operating model. The objective is clear, make the most of what we have while raising the standard for safe, reliable and efficient performance across all our assets. With this new organization, we expect to deliver improved margins and industry-leading operations excellence, improving safety, reliability, maintenance costs and turnarounds across the portfolio. We are also advancing our enterprise-wide process and data platform transformation. As I've said before, this is redesigning end-to-end processes and connecting data, transactions and decision-making across every business, geography and function. Early deployments have gone well, building a strong foundation for larger rollouts in 2027. The work is already simplifying processes, improving line of sight and replacing fragmented reporting with more consistent enterprise data. As it progresses, who will help us learn and act faster, better leverage our scale and accelerate the adoption and value of AI. The value of this transformation is showing up in our results. cumulative structural cost savings have increased to $16.3 billion since 2019, with centralized organizations contributing nearly half of the year-to-date savings. Financially, this was a strong quarter with more than $14 billion of earnings, more than $17 billion of free cash flow and a more than $7 billion reduction in net debt. That strength allows us to keep investing in advantaged opportunities, return surplus cash to shareholders and maintain one of the strongest balance sheets in the industry. Cash capital expenditures were roughly $7 billion, and we returned more than $9 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Finally, in the quarter, shareholders overwhelmingly supported redomiciling ExxonMobil from New Jersey to Texas, which we completed on July 1. The move aligns our legal home with our headquarters and where we have operated for more than 3 decades, while providing a stable, predictable and efficient governance framework that supports sound decision-making long-term value creation and shareholder rights. When I thank our shareholders for their support and the quality dialogue we had across the years engagements. Stepping back, the second quarter was shaped by disruption, but defined by execution. The market benefit was real, and so was the value created by the choices we have made over many years to strengthen the portfolio. lower our cost structure and improve how we operate through deeper integration and technology-enabled execution. That is the point of our transformation. We are building a company that can perform through disruption and deliver superior long-term shareholder value across cycles. Thank you.
James Chapman
executiveThank you, Darren. Before we move to Q&A, 2 things to note. First, as a reminder, the Investors section of our website provides further data on our results and operations, and we encourage investors to take a look. And second, I want to highlight that we plan to publish our annual global outlook in September. A comprehensive report detailing our latest views on global energy demand and supply through 2050, which forms the basis of our long-term business planning. So with that, we can move to Q&A. [Operator Instructions]
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Steve Richardson Evercore.
Stephen Richardson
analystDarren, I wonder if you could start on Guyana. Obviously, what we've all known is really high-quality projects. Can you just talk about this desaturation point, obviously, in light of cost performance and higher commodity price? And maybe just how the timing compares to maybe what your previous expectations were? Also curious if you could talk a little bit about exploration. There's a mention in the disclosure about using AI tools and generating prospects. I think people are also curious about what the exploration outlook in Guyana is, particularly as you think about parts of the block that maybe are underexplored close to Maritime boundary.
Darren Woods
executiveSure. Steve, thanks for your question. I think as you pointed out, it's a real success story in what we've achieved in Guyana, delivering, frankly, the production units faster than we had originally anticipated at a lower cost, running those assets above the investment basis. And then obviously, the market prices have been higher than our base assumption. So all that means more cash sooner, which is good for the project, good for NPV, good for Guyana and the people of Guyana. Obviously, we recover our costs back faster and therefore, desaturate quicker, which is a good story. And I would say we -- that was a moving target as prices manifest themselves as we deliver those units and continue to grow production, we kept updating it and then based on price forecast. Our assessment would be happening later this year, early into next year, and that's obviously come forward now with where prices have been. So I think a really good news story. With respect to exploration, I think, too, another good new story. We obviously have a large chunk of acreage, which is in force majeure waiting for the ultimate ruling from the International Court of Justice on the Venezuela dispute. And when we'll see what happens there. We feel there's an opportunity then to start shooting seismic and understand what that acreage potentially holds. And we've got more work to do in the acreage that we've already shot and the work that we've been doing. Think Neil -- Chapman had mentioned at a prior conference this year that we really put a lot of effort into artificial intelligence and training models based on what we found already all the drilling that we've done, the characterization of that subsurface and have unleashed that and the rest of the block and have 4 new discovery opportunities above and beyond what we thought were opportunities. So we're we're optimistic there. Obviously, a lot more work to do to confirm those. But I think our view is we're not done yet and going on it, and we see -- continue to see a really bright future there.
Neil Hansen
executiveMaybe, Darren, just to add to the comments on Guyana. I think this reinforces why we are the partner of choice, especially for developments of the scale. And if you look at the desaturation and Darren mentioned the price impact. But even if you took out that price impact, we saw a 2-year acceleration of our investment recovery and those go back to the things that we mentioned, the ability to execute these projects at industry-leading cost and schedule, running the FPSOs at above 98% reliability, optimizing, being able to produce 100,000 barrels a day above the investment basis. So even without the price impact, we're seeing accelerated recovery of our investment. And as Darren mentioned in his opening remarks, this is about value, not volume. And going forward, we're going to see 2x the level of free cash flow in 2030 than we saw in 2025. So again, just speaks to the tremendous success that we're seeing in Guyana.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Neil Mehta of Goldman Sachs.
Neil Mehta
analystDarren, just love your perspective on the business that you spend a lot of time growing up on the refining system. It's obviously the bottleneck in the petroleum system right now and margins are exceptionally high. So 2 perspectives on that. One is how do you see the situation evolving as you think about the product? And then Neil Hansen, there's probably a question for you on the quarter itself. It did feel like relative to some of the independents the refining earnings were a little softer than I would have thought. And so maybe there was some -- it was more a timing or operational things, but how do you see that progressing as we move into the third quarter?
Darren Woods
executiveYes. Neil, I'll start and then hand it over to the other Neil. I mean as I mentioned this morning, we are a very large refinery, much larger than any of the other IOCs. In fact, we're the #2 in size in the world behind China and outside of China. We are the largest refinery. So we've got a good footprint. And as you know, we have been -- we spent the last 10 years really focused on optimizing that portfolio, divesting refineries that we didn't feel like we could move to the left of the cost of supply curve and then investing in those refineries that we felt like had long-term strategic value and high-grading the yield on those refineries. So today, we have a portfolio that will be very successful in low-margin environments. And then obviously, in higher margin environments, even more successful. And the organization is now very focused on in the short term with these significant constraints in product flow, maximizing production and getting the most needed products to the market and meeting customer demands where there's such a critical need today that's not being met. I see that, frankly, the challenge here is, obviously, with the straight close, we've got about roughly 3 million barrels a day of capacity that's not available to the marketplace. China has stopped exporting. There's another couple of million barrels a day of refining capacity that is not available to the market. And then, of course, Ukraine has been pretty effective at taking Russia refining capacity out. And so another million barrels a day or so of Russian refining capacity that was providing product to the broader market. So with all those that supply out, we're well below available capacity, frankly, that I've ever seen. If you exclude COVID, there was no demand. I've never seen the available capacity relative to demand as low as it is today. It's going to take a while for the industry to kind of climb its way out of that hole. And so from our perspective, we think we're going to continue to see a very robust refining market with very high margins. And of course, our job will be to continue to push as hard as we can to maximize production and try to meet that need because we do recognize that these high margins lead to high product prices, which we also know has a significant impact on consumers and people's pocket book. So we're doing our best to put as much product out there as we can. And I think you see that in the results. I'll just touch on the mix issue and what you're seeing at other refiners versus ExxonMobil. Nobody has the portfolio that we have. Nobody has the mix that we have. Nobody has the geographic footprint. So there's a lot more mix and variability that kind of happens around the market than maybe a stand-alone U.S. refiner or some of these more narrowed refinery companies. But with that, I'll see if Neil has got anything else to add.
Neil Hansen
executiveYes. Let me -- maybe before I get to your question on the quarter, you talk a little bit about Energy Products business. And you look at what we've done over time in terms of investments in our refining capacity, improving the complexity and taking advantage of the scale of our footprint. The portfolio high-grading that we've done and then the day-to-day efforts that we put into place to optimize throughput and capacity and all those things, combined with the growing capability and trading really has resulted in a step change in earnings in that business and Energy Products. In fact, if you look at the contribution from Energy Products to our overall business line earnings -- it's gone from about 9% to about 23% in the last 5 years. So that increase just speaks to the investments we made. It speaks to how we're running and speaks to the trading capability that we've built. And operationally, we ran really well in the quarter. You look at the U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, the reliability exceeded 95% in the quarter. So again, we feel really good about what we've done to strengthen that business over time and how we operate in the second quarter. I think when you look at the quarter, relative to consensus, I think some of that is, as Darren talked about, I mean, there are a lot of moving parts, especially with the volatility and the disruption that we saw. So I think that had an impact on projecting some of those refining margins, but no underlying concerns with how that business has performed, and we're benefiting from the investments and how we're operating in Energy Products.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Arun Jayaram with JPMorgan.
Arun Jayaram
analystDarren, I was wondering if you could help us understand what you're seeing on the ground in terms of the Strait of Hormuz, perhaps you could highlight what you saw in July, just given the disruption impacts. And I guess my overall question as well, I wanted to see how you're thinking about with your partner, Exxon's intention to invest in the repair of the 2 Qatar LNG trains. If you come up with your partner on the plans to repair those facilities?
Darren Woods
executiveYes, sure. Arun, thanks for your question. I don't think I have a lot of additional perspective on the ground with respect to what's happening in the strait. I think it's fairly well covered in the media. And frankly, any discussions I tend to have with the administration is more focused on our perspective of the market. And the implications of a constrained supply and how that will manifest itself. I will say as a big supplier in the marketplace, it is ultimately down to the shipping companies and the crews on those ships to make those transits. And I think the more volatility there is, the more back and forth with respect to disruptions and attacks, you create more uncertainty, more concern and, therefore, less willingness to transit. So I think there's going to be a continued inhibition for movement, which will even once we get things cleared up, I think it will take some time for folks to gain some confidence there to continue to ramp things back up to a very high level. And frankly, we're prepared for that with respect to what we're trying to do. With respect to the broader question, our presence there and the work that we're doing with Qatar, I just come back to the medium to long-term fundamentals, which the world needs the resources in that region, and it needs to have the strait open and transiting back at levels it was prior to this conflict. And so we're convinced that, that will come to be at some point in the future. And I can't really predict when it will happen or exactly what it will look like. I just know that it's too critical to the overall health of world economy and for people -- to meet people's standards of living to have that disrupted for perpetuity. So it will come back. It will be needed. We've got a long relationship there. We value the partnerships we have. We're in dialogue with QatarEnergy. I think we have a particularly significant role that we can play to bring our expertise to help expedite to repairs. We're in discussions with key about that and frankly, looking for the best approach there where obviously, QatarEnergy and the people of Qatar benefit and ExxonMobil benefits as well. And so I think the one thing I would say about our long, long-standing relationship with QatarEnergy as they recognize the importance of win-win solutions and certainly very focused on how we figure out the path forward here to get production back on and flowing as soon as we're able to.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Devin McDermott of Morgan Stanley.
Devin McDermott
analystDarren, you highlighted -- really strong non-Middle East upstream production in the quarter, the highest in over 2 decades. You talked a little bit before about Guyana and one of the other drivers of growth is the Permian volumes at 1.8 million BOE a day in the quarter in line with your full year guide. I know that this year marked a big step-up in some of the use of advanced proppant and other new technology. I was wondering you could just give us an update on how that's progressing versus expectations, typically as it relates to capital efficiency and recoveries that you're seeing there across the basin.
Darren Woods
executiveYes, sure. Thanks for the question, Devin. And you touched on, I think, one of the really important variables there, which is the progress we're making with respect to the technology portfolio. We've been talking for some time now that we've got plus technology developments that we're working and have been going out and trialing in the field. And the value of those technologies or most of them are stackable, so that you keep building on the success and drive more and more recovery, fewer wells, so less capital. And I'd tell you that, that portfolio continues to exceed expectations for the technologies that are successful. So I put out a challenge back in 2018 for doubling recovery, we have an opportunity set that we'll do more than that. And when you risk it for all the uncertainties associated with that portfolio, we're getting really close to that objective. And it's just a function of continuing to deploy those technologies and getting it to a critical mass to where it's transparent to the rest of the market as we continue to bring them into new production new wells. So I feel really good about that. I'm really confident what the team is doing a lot of energy and motivation by the technology organization and our Permian organization to deploy the technology and to see the benefits of that. So we're more than on track.
Neil Hansen
executiveYes. I think, Devin, maybe just to add to that. I mean there is a lot of excitement around the technology that's being developed and will be deployed. But I think you can easily look past the expertise and the technology that's already being used in the Permian. You look at things like extended reach laterals, I mean we're leading the Permian and long lateral development. I think in the opening remarks, we mentioned in mile wells that we've drilled year-to-date. But if you look back and you look at all the Permian producing wells since 2020, anything above 3 miles or longer, we have 1,200 wells. I think our nearest competitor is around 400, and you would have to go to the next 6 competitors to get to that same level of 1,200. So you look at the extended reach laterals, surfactants, AI, machine learning, all of that is contributing to very strong performance even before we start to deploy some of these other technologies.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Doug Leggate of Wolfe Research.
Douglas George Blyth Leggate
analystDarren, I hate to beat on Guyana. I wonder if I could come back to Guyana on a couple of clarification points or maybe more than that perhaps. I think there's some confusion between production entitlement and free cash flow, maybe it's for Neil. But I wonder if you could just opine on -- although your production interment goes down, what happens to your free cash flow? That's my first kind of part of that. And I guess I can't help but notice Phase 9 is now part of the story. What is your latest thinking on gross production sustainability through the end of the decade, maybe a little beyond that?
Darren Woods
executiveYes. Thank you, Doug, and I'll let Neil talk a little bit about the free cash flow portion of the question. I would just say we're going through our plan process currently, which we will finalize as we get to the end of the year and then come out and talk about it as part of our corporate plan update. And as part of that, every year, we revisit to what are the opportunities, what progress have we made, how is our thinking developed. And indeed, one of the things that we now see an opportunity for is this 9th FPSO and really take advantage of what we've done with long tail to replicate that and get some significant capital advantages to apply. And so our view is that's looking promising. We haven't finalized that, obviously, but we're progressing and it looks pretty attractive at this stage. I think longer term, we've got more work to do. As I mentioned, one of the responding one of the earlier questions, there's a lot of acreage yet to fully take advantage of. And so we're continuing to exploration, continuing to look for opportunities. I mentioned that with some of the AI tools that we've trained with what we've already found in the drilling we've done. We have seen some new opportunities to explore that we hadn't previously identified. So I would tell you this thing, the tape hasn't run out on this play yet, and we're going to continue to evaluate that and see what we can get from it. But mean you can rest assured the organization is very focused on maximizing the value of that acreage for the benefit, obviously, back on mobile, but more importantly, for Guyana government and Guyana -- people of Guyana. But I'll let Neil talk a little bit about the free cash flow question.
Neil Hansen
executiveYes. Let me try to answer your question, Doug. So again, as we mentioned, at this point, we fully recovered the $55 billion of investment along with all the operating costs. And the way the contractor agreement works is we can recover that investment up to 75%. After that, the remaining production is shared 50-50 between us and the government of Guyana. And so if you think about -- if you just stop today and there's no additional investment, then more of your production and revenue is going to flow towards cash flow, again, shared between us and the government of Guyana. The reality is we have more investment. To the extent we have the investment come in and operating costs, it will still go into the cost bank. We'll still recover that at that 75% cap, but there's much less investment to recover. And given the level of production that we're at, you're unlikely to see that cost bank obviously be full again. And so you'll just have more cash flow above your investment and above the operating cost. Now that obviously is a question of what you think price is going to do going forward in addition to the investment and cost that we'll be putting into the cost bank. So hopefully, that helps. But we would anticipate, and I think we showed that in the slides, that now that we've reached full recovery of that significant investment, more of our revenues will go towards cash flow, free cash flow versus recovering cost and investment. Hopefully, that helps, Doug.
Douglas George Blyth Leggate
analystNeil, just to be clear, so is it fair to characterize this as an inflection in free cash flow then as opposed to a decline in production entitlement...
Neil Hansen
executiveIt's very much an inflection into free cash flow. Absolutely. And this -- for us, Doug, and I assume for you as well, this is about value. It's not about volume, right, even though there's a slight decline in the entitled volume the focus we have is on the value that we've created for ourselves and for the government of Guyana. And at this point, there's an inflection to where you're going to see a much larger amount of free cash flow come in. It is a very positive, exciting story.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Betty Jiang of Barclays.
Wei Jiang
analystWe're seeing an increasing number of resource-rich governments looking for partners to accelerate the development of their resources. And as Neil said earlier, Exxon's track record, just really positioning you guys as a partner of choice. These are long -- large-scale long-duration resources but can also come with different set of risk. How do you evaluate these opportunities for Exxon and their competitiveness relative to what you already have in the portfolio?
Darren Woods
executiveSure. Betty, I'll take that and then see if Neil wants to add anything to it. So I'd come back to the fundamental investment thesis that we have across all of our businesses is the projects that we pursue and ultimately advanced have to have an advantage versus what others in the industry can do. It has to -- we have to be able to drive the cost of supply to the far left of the cost curve so that the supply cost curve so that we know, irrespective of where the market goes and the ups and downs and prices and margins that will have investments that generate industry returns. And that's been the philosophy across every business that we have and all the projects that we evaluate. And the results of that are manifesting themselves today and all the investments we made over the last 10 years, that's not going to change going forward. And so I'd say, first and foremost, as we look at new opportunities, you got to clear that hurdle. Do we bring an advantage? Do we end up with a project that's advantaged versus the rest of industry? And is it at a very low cost of supply, and therefore, generate above-industry returns? And I think that's the criteria that all of our businesses are driving towards. And then, of course, when it comes to specific areas and risk -- country risk associated with those areas. The market tends to decide that. And so our view is we'll -- we will generate projects that realize the risk premium associated with any projects in some of those areas, consistent with the rest of the market, and then we'll add to that with our advantages. And then the final step is making sure that we manage that risk in the portfolio. One of the advantages of being large and having a very diversified portfolio is we can diversify out of a specific risk. So we don't have to bet the farm on any one location or any one place. And we keep a very close eye on the overall exposure of the portfolio and look at how that's developing and as we make investments is that portfolio risk changing significantly or not. So how we do -- what we've seen to date, you see it today with some of the disruption in the Middle East. You saw it several years back with the Russia disruptions that the portfolio is robust some of these unexpected events, and that's how we'll manage it.
Neil Hansen
executiveAnd Betty, I think you're absolutely right. I think our track record and a recognition of our capabilities certainly is leading us to being the clear partner of choice. And when we talk about that, you look at being in a capital-intensive business like we are. It's the ability to execute large-scale projects, leverage technology and then operate at a very high standard and a very high level. And I mean if you look at just the ability to execute projects, we're doing about twice the number of mega projects in our nearest IOC, and we're doing it up to 20% lower project costs and our project delivery schedules are 20% faster than industry average. So I think it's -- when you look at resource owners, I think there's absolute recognition of that capability, that track record of being able to do those 3 things really well. And then as Darren mentioned, I mean, when we look at any opportunity, obviously, you look at the terms, but more importantly is can we bring something unique and different, can we leverage those competitive advantages to provide an outsized return for our shareholders. So that's kind of how we think about it. But we are in a, I think, in a nice position with resource owners given what we've been able to accomplish in places like Guyana.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Bob Brackett of Bernstein Research.
Bob Brackett
analystI'm struck by the combination of lower base volumes on the energy product side amidst record diesel production, that diesel production could be cyclical, you're playing way with set points or whatnot or it could be structural. And I suspect it's structural. You all will continue to break that seasonal production record over time? And sort of a quick follow-up, how did you decide around scheduled maintenance and choices around deferring scheduled maintenance and maybe grabbing opportunistically some better product prices?
Darren Woods
executiveYes. I think one of the things you hit on is this drive we've had across our portfolio to continue to high-grade the bottom of the barrel, the low-value molecules into higher-value molecules and distillate, obviously, is one of the higher-value in-demand molecules that come out of our refineries. So if you look at what we've been doing over the last 10 years with investments in Antwerp, investments in Rotterdam, the investments that we've made in Singapore to upgrade these low-value molecules and as a result, get more distillate out, that is continuing a continuing focus. And in fact, we have a number of projects in development and slated for what we're doing in the Gulf Coast to continue that trend and to continue to grow sleet and base stock production. So that is a clear theme and to make our refineries, frankly, lower-cost suppliers and higher-margin facilities, which is a clear focus. If you look at just what we've accomplished here in the last 3 years, our global throughput is up 11%, and the production of jet and diesel is up by 15%. So it is reflective of the work that we've been doing. Anything to add to that, Neil?
Neil Hansen
executiveAnd Bob, I'm not sure what time frame you're looking at. But certainly, there's an impact from planned maintenance and turnarounds in the quarter. And there's a number of scheduled maintenance activities that we have completed this year, and that's had an impact, obviously, on volumes. And we've done everything we can certainly to consider the current refining and margin environment, if we can safely defer some of that, that's certainly been part of the consideration. And I think why you're seeing such strong performance on utilization. I would just say though, and I think it's back to the benefits of the centralized organization with global operations, the turnarounds that we have completed this year, what we've seen relative to the last time we did a similar turnaround or in the previous cycle, we've seen a 30% improvement in cost and a 60% improvement in duration. So harder to see, but that certainly helps us to ensure we're not leaving anything on the table in this type of environment is when we do execute those turnarounds, we're executing them at leading edge, certainly in the first quartile.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Biraj Borkhataria with RBC.
Biraj Borkhataria
analystIt's on the downstream. And Darren, you've been talking about the policy in the past and some comments there as well. I wanted to get anticipate on that. I think we shared the same view. But as of yesterday, 1 European country approved windfall taxes effectively on the downstream. And given what's happened to oil product prices, the refining margins, it seems like this will be a growing theme. You've got 850,000 barrels a day of refining between U.K. and Europe. So I was wondering I assume you've been in contact with the policymakers. So have you had any discussions on this topic? And how likely do you think that this will be put in place?
Darren Woods
executiveYes. Thank you, Biraj. I think there's a huge temptation all around the world deflect attention to the bad policies that governments have been implementing over time and scapegoat the industry. And the reality is, we saw a long time ago with the emphasis that Europe has been putting on, frankly, deindustrializing their economy and shutting down refineries that there would come a point in time when they would be short product and we see that today. And so any time you get into an environment where demand spikes and there's a shortage of supply versus demand and it's trying to be met that refinery margins will rise and those who stayed in the business and tried to improve that business to be successful across the cycle will make money. Penalizing the businesses who've stood by those countries and provided that product going forward is very shortsighted and leads us the past windfall tax to invest even less. So we canceled investments that we had planned Europe based on the last time they passed the windfall profit tax. And in fact, pursuing the -- because we don't think that's a legal taking for the industry. I think the discussions I've been having with many of the leaders there recognize the problem with that approach and the consequence is the unintended consequences of that approach. So they're sensitive to it. I'm not sure that's going to keep them from trying to address concerns of their base, but we'll have to see if any of that actually manifest itself in real policy regulation. If it is, it's just another great example of misguided policy that ultimately is going to inflect more higher cost and lower standards of living on their population. And I hope at some point in time that the European population wakes up to the very poor policy decisions being made there.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Jean Ann Salisbury with Bank of America.
Jean Ann Salisbury
analystThere are many gas pipelines coming on in the Permian starting now. A lot of investors, including us, think that it could lead to a shift to materially more gas and NGL growth out of the Permian as operators are no longer making decisions around constraining their gas to oil ratio. As the largest operator in the Permian, do you anticipate your gas volumes or gas to oil ratio in the Permian will inflect as a result of the new pipe?
Darren Woods
executiveAnd we have a very similar assessment, as you do with respect to the balances on the piping and that market will now clear, and we won't see the disconnects that we've historically seen. I don't -- my sense of things is, and I can't speak for the entire industry, but as we're developing wells. We're looking at the economics, and there's a clear incentive to have higher oil production. I think that's been, I'd say, a general trend within the industry as you look at economically maximizing the value of every well, you want more oil and less gas given the constraints in the gas market. I think that's not going to change. My sense would be to get more into -- if you got the takeaway capacity, it just opens up your ability to more oil and the gas then comes with it. And so we may see some additional gas come on to the marketplace associated with that. But the real driver will be unconstrained takeaway capacity and maximizing oil production.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Jason Gabelman of TD Cowen.
Jason Gabelman
analystI wanted to go back to the Middle East footprint and specifically on the LNG side. I think you have over 2/3 of your LNG portfolio, primarily in Qatar. And as you assess the changing risk profile in that region, are you looking to either accelerate LNG projects in your queue to help diversify away from the Middle East? Are you evaluating more closely external opportunities? Or do you feel pretty comfortable with your LNG risk exposure?
Darren Woods
executiveYes. Thank you, Jason. I guess I'd start by just saying we're not extrapolating current events to kind of a long-term change in the stability of the region. As I said earlier in the call, ultimately, the world has to resolve the conflict there and get to a stable situation where those critical resources in the region find a way to the market in a reliable way. And so I think, ultimately, there's a solution that the world will arrive at, couldn't tell you exactly when or what it's going to look like. But that -- those resources are just too critical to the overall economic health of the world for them to stay offline or for them to be unstable. And so I would say that's generally how we think about it. If you look at our portfolio of opportunities in LNG, it has through the opportunity set that we have, diversifying our production away from the Middle East just based on where the opportunity set is. And so Mozambique, we hope to FID that project later this year. We've got Papua and Papua New Guinea that we look to FID later this year. We got Golden Pass coming on. So I think we continue to see opportunities and very large opportunities that are on the left-hand side, the cost of supply curve coming online, so that's going to achieve some diversification. I would also tell you that as we continue to look for future opportunities, given the important role that natural gas is going to play, we won't shy away from the region.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Manav Gupta of UBS.
Manav Gupta
analystI wanted to go a little bit into Specialty Products. What's the margin environment looking like? Because lubes are extremely tight right now. Lubes margin are are uniquely high and you do have a strong base stocks business. And then also wanted to understand how Mobil 1 is tracking? And any further updates you can give us on Proxxima, how the traction with new clients is going on Proxxima?
Darren Woods
executiveSure. Thank you, Manav. Well, I'd say the specialty business is no different than any other sector business that we have, which is significant supply disruptions, significant challenges with meeting the base demand and base stock is clearly where it starts, particularly given the importance of Middle East crude with respect to base stock production. And so one of the advantages that we've had is with the investments that we've made both in Singapore and in Rotterdam, synthetic base stocks that we can make open up the crude slate and give us opportunities to make base stocks with less dependence on Middle East crudes versus some of the more traditional extraction methods. So we've more robust to that disruption, but clearly, the market is tight. We're leaning as hard as we can with respect to the base stock production. And we're seeing the benefits of that with the high earnings that we made in Specialty Products. We're also quite advantaged with respect to the value chain that we participate in and being part of base stocks, obviously, running the refineries running basestock production, running that basestock marketing business down to finished lubes, coupled with the technology organization that we have, a lot of work the organization has been doing around reformulating to kind of find ways with the available molecules that are out there to meet customer demand, and we've been very successful with that. So that ability to respond to the constraints and the challenges and find better ways to continue to meet customer demand is paying off as well. And so I think we see the business that we've established there and our participation along that entire value chain, really paying off this quarter. And our expectation is as that straight remains constrained, we'll continue to see a big benefit in our specialty businesses for having that integrated approach to running that business. With respect to Proxxima, I would just say we've -- we're progressing the investments to expand capacity. Like what we're seeing there, the size of that market is huge and all the applications that we've been testing and the work we've been doing continues to demonstrate a very high value and use for our customer base. So we've got the 35,000 KT expansion -- [ 35 KT ] expansion has come online. And then we've FID the next large step in our proximal blending plant earlier this year. And so we see a big opportunity. It will take time to kind of realize that opportunity because you're obviously starting a brand-new market, a brand-new product for some very attractive markets. But we see -- again, the customer feedback says there's high demand for that and it will just take time to penetrate, but we see a long-term attractive potential here.
Neil Hansen
executiveAnd maybe just go back to Specialty Products. I think for the reasons side of the investments that we've made, including the resid upgrade project in Singapore last year, which allows us to continue to grow high-value products for that business, Specialty Products, it was a record earnings for the quarter, and it's also a record earnings for the first half of this year. And so again, that just demonstrates prices certainly were supportive, but it's all about those advantaged investments we're making, the focus on growing high-value products is clearly yielding very strong results for Specialty.
Operator
operatorThe next question comes from Sam Margolin of Wells Fargo.
Sam Margolin
analystThis is on the structural cost savings, you've made tremendous progress, but you have been fighting inflation, and it looks like there's some environmental drivers that are potentially adding some more friction. Is there -- can you talk a little bit about the way that the mix shift in your portfolio and the development of major projects in the life cycle that you're at today might influence this cost-out progress. It feels like as you enter like these new phases of free cash flow sort of oriented phase in Guyana and you bring on fewer developments at a time, simultaneously, there may be some levers to offset the inflation impact. But in any case, I would just love your thoughts on that whole trend.
Darren Woods
executiveYes, sure. Thanks, Sam. Thanks for the question. I would just say maybe just step back and talk a little bit about the philosophy that we started back in 2018, which was we knew we wanted to grow the business. We wanted to make these investments and recognize that as we did that, that as you start new facilities, bring new projects online that you incur more operating expense and as you develop new products to go into new markets here, spending money on R&D and basically incurring more operating expense. So we recognize the path to growth meant additional operating expenses. And the challenge that we gave ourselves in the organization was to recognizing we needed to do that to grow earnings and cash flow that we had to find a way to offset that cost. And we weren't going to let our expenses rise. And the only way to do that is start figuring out structural cost savings and driving structural cost out of the business to make room for the additional spend that we knew would come for doing high-value accretive projects and product development. And that's exactly what we've been doing. And so the cost savings have come, I'd say, primarily through the transformation we've been driving into the business and creating the value chain, giving organizations, a clearer line of sight and more direct accountability for end-to-end profitability that puts a very high focus on operating expenses. The synergies that we're capturing through the consolidations that we're making and the centralized organizations are driving huge value and cost reductions. And I would tell you, we just announced on July 1, the formation or the completion of our global operations organization, where for the first time in the company's history, we have all of our operations in one organization which, again, will open up opportunities to identify efficiencies that have been implemented in some parts of our portfolio, but haven't been spread across the whole. So we've got a long ways to go on, I think, structural efficiencies, and that's not even bringing into account the ERP system that we're developing, which I think, again, will unlock a lot of opportunities. So our job is to keep driving down the structural cost to make room for the additional expense that comes from these -- from growth. We don't limit frankly, our growth or the projects that we pursue based on trying to meet an artificial overall cost target. We have a very clear and separate objective on growth and a focus on cost and cost efficiency, and that continues, I think, to play out very well. In fact, I think if you look at our cash cost, from last year versus this year and ignore production taxes. In energy prices, we're basically holding cash costs flat. So we're basically offsetting the inflation that's out there. and that's the objective here.
Neil Hansen
executiveMaybe just additional point on that. Darren, just to demonstrate the progress that we've made Darren mentioned the year-over-year comparison. But if you took our cash expenses this year and you just annualize it, our cash OpEx would look even with 2019. And again, that's what all the growth that we've had. You mentioned the inflationary impacts. I think it just demonstrates the hard work and the focus that we have on removing across the enterprise, and that's regardless of the market conditions, that's regardless of how much we make in a specific quarter. And it also, as Darren mentioned, demonstrates the power of the model that we have. And again, we're at $16.3 billion cumulative year-to-date, we plan to get to $20 billion by 2030. So again, really good progress and it's pretty impressive to see how we've been able to offset some of the impacts that you mentioned, Sam.
Operator
operatorWe have time for one more question. Our final question will be from John Royall of Piper Sandler.
John Royall
analystSo we've seen some news flow over the past couple of months about talks of an expansion of the Kashagan project in Kazakhstan. I was hoping maybe for some thoughts on where you are in those discussions and what a project could ultimately look like there.
Darren Woods
executiveJohn, thanks for the question. I would say, obviously, a huge opportunity, we think, in Kazakhstan to optimize what's been going on there and to help the government achieve its objectives of growing production growing the benefit of their natural resources for the benefit of the Kazakh government and the people of Kazakhstan. But we're very early in those conversations. I think many of the companies involved in the business there are engaged in discussions. We've got some hurdles to clear and some short-term issues with the government and then continuing to look longer term around the different options available to the industry broadly and more specifically to ExxonMobil in terms of what we can bring to bear to help achieve ultimately the government's ambition of growing production there and growing their revenues. But I would say it's -- we're too early in that process to give you much detail on that.
James Chapman
executiveThank you, John, and thanks, everyone, for joining this call. Thanks for your questions. We're going to post the transcript of the call to the Investors section of our website by early next week, and have a good weekend.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.