Fastighets AB Balder (publ) (BALDB) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 27, 2023

Nasdaq Stockholm SE Real Estate Real Estate Management and Development earnings 36 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Welcome to the Balder Q3 Report 2023. [Operator Instructions] Now I will hand the conference over to the speakers, CEO, Erik Selin; and CFO, Ewa Wassberg. Please go ahead.

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#2

Good morning, and welcome to Balder's presentation of the year-end report for 2022. Here from us today is me, Ewa Wassberg, CFO at Balder; and Erik Selin. After the presentation there will be a Q&A session.

Erik Selin

executive
#3

Thanks, Ewa. So we present the year-end figures. But first, we have some short information about Balder as the company. We are listed real estate company in '05. We have properties predominantly in the Nordic countries. And we have roughly half residential and half commercial properties. At year-end, the property value was SEK 217 billion, 96% occupancy rate. On the longer leases, the biggest leases are on average 10 years for our largest single leases. We have a great [ team ] at S&P that is triple V flat. Net debt to total assets, 47.9%. We have cash, SEK 25 billion cash and facilities at year-end. And NAV per share stands at SEK 92 compared to SEK 84 last year. And the average NAV growth since inception '05 has been 29% per year. Looking at the Q4 figures. Rental income was up 16% compared to last year. Profit from property management decreased slightly or 5%. The reason behind that decrease was in the financial cost that we had an extraordinary financial income last year. So the underlying earnings were slightly better. But quarter-on-quarter, we have a decrease. Looking at the full year, rental income is up 17% and profit from property management is up 11%. And then looking a bit at the current status and looking forward, the earnings capacity stands at SEK 5.39 per share at year-end, and that is 4% better than 1 year ago. And so this means that we have been able to offset increased interest rate cost with more income from the underlying business. Net debt to assets, 47.9%, and we had like-for-like rental growth of 3.9%. And looking a bit more at the portfolio, the characteristics is that it's very diversified both in property type and in geography, but there is a concentration to the larger cities and capitals in the Nordic regions. So we have Helsinki, Gothenburg, Stockholm and Copenhagen dominating. And in property categories, resi is by far the biggest, and then we have office some retail logistics and also other properties that can be mixed properties and hotels, for example. We also invest in development of properties in the Nordic countries, and we have basically 2 categories of development. One is where we build and we keep it, mostly residential but can also be pre-let commercial properties. And we have also then another business line predominantly in Sweden, but in some cases in Finland and Denmark as well where we build resi properties and sell to consumers. And this shows up a bit differently in the P&L. The properties we keep will be unrealized value changes as we go along with the projects. The properties that we sell or the apartments that we sell, then the result is booked after completion. So there is some from properties that we sell or a partner that we sell will be more irregular if we look at it quarter-to-quarter. But of course, the long-term trend can be interesting to look at, but quarterly figures will be irregular in that segment. But the most important thing has always been to, over time, increase the earnings -- the cash flow. We are a long term owner and so profit from property management is the single most important thing that we focus on. And since inception we have had an upward trend there over the years. It hasn't been the same increase every year, obviously, so it's been a bit irregular as well, but the long-term trend has been good over time, but things can happen in different years that sort of affect this trend a lot. So in '08 we had a small decrease and then you might think it was the financial crisis but it actually wasn't, as we sold a lot of properties in '07, but then it took off again. You can also see here on this Slide 6, the very flat [ piece ] between '19 and '20, and that was the pandemic that made things slow down a bit. It was still an increase but not as fast. And then last year, as I said before, was 11%. And on the next page, you can see from the beginning the portfolio value have been increasing since we started in '05. And at the same time, we have lowered the debt to assets. So the trend is down then also on a longer time horizon. Occupancy been very stable. And of course, we have a very spread portfolio of different areas, cities, asset classes, so it makes us very sticky. So my forecast is that there will never be in a big changes up or down the occupancy rate. And so as you can see it's been 96% for many years in a row now, and was 96% this year-end as well. And then we had what we call earnings capacity, and this is sort of how the situation is in the quarter and is updated every quarter in the quarterly reports. So there is how it looks on that particular quarter end. So here, you see then, for example, the rental income on a yearly basis is SEK 11.6 billion at December 31. And then what's new for this year is that we also make a forecast for the profit from property management for the full year '23. We never did that before but we felt it could have a value this year since there seems to be a lot of uncertainty from an operational standpoint. So our forecast is that profit from property management in '23 will be SEK 6.2 billion. And as you can see the last figure here in 31st December is 6, 2020, so it's more or less the same. And what we then see in this year is that we will have some more rental income from projects that will be completed and will most likely have some more interest cost or next financial will be slightly more than SEK 2.9 billion, but the rental income will also be slightly more than SEK 11.6 billion. So this is our forecast as of today. And now I hand over to Ewa Wassberg.

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#4

Over to ESG. Here, you can see our sustainable of work and sustainability is prioritized issue for Balder and an integrated part of our strategy and operations. On this slide you can see our framework for the sustainability, which is based on the international growth of Agenda 2030 and also a commitment that the company strives to achieve. On the sustainability work focuses on the issues where the company has the greatest opportunity to influence and at the same time manage the risk effective real estate company in various sustainability issues. Examples of sustainable issues are; reduced emissions of greenhouse gases, environmentally certified properties, sustainability in social in our property area, [indiscernible] together with a good working environment for our employees. And on the next slide, you can see a little bit what we have been focused on during this year and also a glance on, the focus is for 2023. So 2022 is the first year in which we must report the proportion of green activities in the business, the focus on our existing companies. We have recruited to strengthen the team around social sustainability and area development. We've also carried out to group wide climate calculations and completed the screening of Scope 3. We have started the transition conversion to a fossil-free vehicle fleet in the Swedish management orientation as well as initiatives undertaking for sustainable travel to and from our properties. For example, 120 charging points in Sweden. And when we look ahead of 2023, we will focus on an update about this green framework. We will compile climate count for Scope 1, 2 and 3, which will also form the base -- baseline for our science based targets. We will carry out screening of Scope 3, that is in -- and indirect emissions, which includes our subsidiaries at group level. We will also use their climate calculations to set a climate road map and submit our climate targets for validation at the science-based target initiative. And we will continue to work with climate risk analysis and action plans as part of the EU Taxonomy force. And as many new [indiscernible] will affect sustainability reporting, we are making a review to meet this as well. And over to financing. Having a balance sheet that satisfies the criteria for investment grade is very important to us, and the Board of Directors have decided to introduce an additional financing goal regarding net debt to EBITDA with a target of maximum 11 times over a period of time. We will achieve this goal through a combination of reduced net debt and increased income from our existing property portfolio and the completion of the projects. [indiscernible] and manage our balance sheet and maturity structure. During the fourth quarter, we have, for example, entered a 5 near-term loan to a value of just over SEK 6.1 billion. And all of the banks that we have had contact with has been positive and [indiscernible]. As you can see in the graph, we are very well equipped for the coming year. You can also see some other things that we have been performing during the year, the direct share issue, of course, of SEK 1.8 billion net. We have conducted a number of tender offerings during August 2023 of SEK 2.5 billion and EUR 500 million, resulting in buybacks of SEK 1.6 billion and EUR 223 million. We have also called the hybrid with first [indiscernible] March 2023 amounting to EUR 320 million. As of the year-end, the available liquidity including confirmed loan commitments was SEK 26 billion which is 92% of future maturities of interest-bearing liabilities being 18 months and 80% of within 24 months. 70% of the loans is hedged by interest rate changes had a little bit of impact on the cost of borrowing, and all financial targets are met. Please note though that we have introduced a new financial target as the net debt EBITDA of 11 times over time, and that is, of course, not met at day one. You can also see in the graph the portfolio value and the net debt to total assets as well as secured debt to total assets over time. At the next slide, you can see an overview of the debt maturity for bank bonds and commercial paper. For 2023, the combined debt amounts to approximately SEK 16 billion and bonds maturing in 2023 will be repaid after Q2. As you are seeing, we have today announced a tender offer for all bonds maturing in 2024, amounting to SEK 4.5 billion. And on the lower end of the slide you can see our financial targets. Equity asset ratio of 40% in line with our targets. Net debt to total assets, 47.9% target of 50% and ICR of 4.7%, where we have a target that's 2. And also the new target net debt to EBITDA of 13.4%, with a long-term target of 11x.

Erik Selin

executive
#5

Yes. Looking at the share, as you all know share prices can be very volatile, been absolutely so for the last year or 2 or 3, not at least in the real estate stocks. The long-term trend is anyhow there that over a long time period, most likely the share price will follow the NAV but you can have this short times where we have substantial premiums or substantial discounts. And as investors, you all know that this happens every now and then. And year-end there is a discount of almost 50% if you look at the share price compared to NAV. And at the last page, this is also in more detail the P&L and the balance sheet where you can see all the specifics and also where you can see how the shareholder structure is by year-end. And with that, we thank you all for listening in.

Operator

operator
#6

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Jan Ihrfelt from Kepler Cheuvreux.

Jan Ihrfelt

analyst
#7

I actually have a couple of questions. First one is, in your earnings capacity you raised the contribution from associates by SEK 100 million, could you just explain a little bit about the reasons behind it?

Erik Selin

executive
#8

No. The reasons behind this, we always try to think what's reasonable and so there's a small adjustment. Nothing special is the reason actually.

Jan Ihrfelt

analyst
#9

And could you comment on which company that contributes with the upgrade or?

Erik Selin

executive
#10

No, I will summarize all of them. I don't actually know all the parts there, Jan, but I said there's a small adjustment.

Jan Ihrfelt

analyst
#11

Yes. And then a question on the bond market, you want to be in the bond market, could you just comment upon what kind of spreads you would like to see to enter that market on a broader view?

Erik Selin

executive
#12

We basically think that we compare with banking markets and -- it could make sense to have some premium or I mean pay a slightly higher interest rate in the bond market. But if it's much higher, we think is better to have bank financing. So a bit depending on how the bank market is. But let's say, right now, we would like a price maybe maximum SEK 200 or preferably a bit lower and we are not there right now so that's why we're focusing on bank financing for the time being. But long term, we think it's interesting and we want to be there long term, but it's more of a timing issue and we think it will be better further on.

Jan Ihrfelt

analyst
#13

Okay. Value changes, you took down your property values by 0.8%. Were there any large differentiations between different segments behind that?

Erik Selin

executive
#14

In general, low-yielding residentials in Sweden is more under pressure value-wise than other segments, I would say. Otherwise, there are not any big changes this quarter. But of course, if every quarter is like this and over time it will be a big change. And also interesting to see that we will follow this, for example, Copenhagen, I mean, we own more or less only a resi and its owners apartment and the prices there are actually increasing quite fast. We haven't done any changes but it's an interesting observation that is, I think, year-over-year, it's 8% plus.

Jan Ihrfelt

analyst
#15

Okay. And a question on Entra. We saw that Castellum took down the value of Entra but you didn't, as far as I could see. Could you comment upon your need to write it down?

Erik Selin

executive
#16

We have it booked in line or slightly lower than Entra's NAV. So the long-term value we agree with Entra's NAV. I don't know how Castellum had it booked before, they probably had it booked over NAV, that is my guess. So most likely we have the same value now. I haven't looked at Castellum but I would guess so. And this is because it's a long-term holding. If you have the long-term value in the books, so you don't take market-to-market up or down unless you think it's a permanent loss. So that's the accounting principles.

Jan Ihrfelt

analyst
#17

Okay. And a final one from my side. Regarding the project [indiscernible] to net, could you just explain how much in percentage was sold, and are there any risks that you will lose money on that project?

Erik Selin

executive
#18

No, we don't think we will lose money. I think it's extremely small likelihood because it takes that they make very big losses because it's like the waterfall structure. So we have a fixed result on that one. But anyhow, it's sold about 80% of the apartments right now. And for '23, it's very few left and then there are apartments to sell next year. But I actually feel less and less worried about it because it's so close to be finished now. So -- so I think if there was a risk, it was maybe 1 or 2 years ago because the construction could have been more expensive and other things could have happened, but we are approaching the finish line.

Operator

operator
#19

The next question comes from Markus Henriksson from ABG Sundal Collier.

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#20

First, a question on the condominium projects. If we look at the different projects, some have very good sales ratio while others have noted, for example, [indiscernible] and [indiscernible] have quite a lot of apartments still for sale. Could you give us a bit of an overall update on the strategy going forward? We have seen [indiscernible] lowering its prices, for example, in order to safeguard cash flow?

Erik Selin

executive
#21

Yes, if you take [indiscernible] on that, that was originally supposed to be a rental project but then we changed our mind and make it into a condominium to sell. So that's why it's a bit late but we will see how it goes soon. It will be sold in parts. So worst case, we can always go back and rent it out anyway but we think it will work out as a project to sell instead. And as you said, in Stockholm has been a slow market so we will see what we do there. But the remaining projects for '23 is sold so that is stable and then there's only those 2 left '24. So I think it actually went quite well overall. And it's a very, very small part for us, it will not move the needle in any direction to projects.

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#22

Fair enough. Then did you get any electricity support here in Q3, and if so, how large was the effect on NOI positively affected?

Erik Selin

executive
#23

I think it's very small because we don't get that much and part of it goes to the tenants because we have in the contract that you sort of pay for it and if you get money back, we also adjust in that way. So I don't remember the figure, but do you know Ewa?

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#24

No, I don't have that from the top of my head.

Erik Selin

executive
#25

But it's a very small. No, it's negligible.

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#26

All right. Then did you have any positive contribution from bond or hybrid bond repurchases here in Q3, and if so, what's the figure?

Erik Selin

executive
#27

If it was a positive?

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#28

Did you have any positive contribution in net interest from repurchase of bond or hybrid in Q3?

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#29

Yes, there was a little effect there.

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#30

And do you have the figure?

Erik Selin

executive
#31

No, not exactly. I think we have some plus, some minus. So it's a smaller plus overall in the financial net but not any big numbers.

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#32

All right. Then a bit of a follow-up to Jan's question before on [indiscernible]. First, you have the priority dividend of SEK 600 million, but you have also signed to acquire around 1,400 apartments and I think a 10,000 or 12,000 square meter of commercial assets, and you also have an option to acquire the hotel and office that in [indiscernible]. Could you give us a brief update on potential capital in and outflow?

Erik Selin

executive
#33

Now we have a call option, so we can buy but we don't have to buy. So if you want to, we can buy, we don't have to buy the commercial premises. So it's voluntary for us. And we haven't decided yet, by the way. And the other projects in [indiscernible] that is in the JV, we have them on hold because we think we want a stronger resi market before we do anything there. So they are on hold for the time being.

Markus Henriksson

analyst
#34

Last question, a bit on Entra. If we look at your rating, you're well within your threshold of the investment-grade rating. Is that something you think is the way forward also for Entra being a main shareholder in that company?

Erik Selin

executive
#35

I think it's actually better you ask Entra and directly to have a more precise answer than me answering for them.

Operator

operator
#36

The next question comes from Neeraj Kumar from Barclays.

Neeraj Kumar

analyst
#37

I have just a quick question on your rating from S&P. I see the rating was -- got a negative outlook like almost a year ago. Given that you have recently even bought hybrids, is it fair to assume that you feel comfortable that the negative outlook will be resolved without any negative implications or any color around that?

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#38

That's our view, yes.

Operator

operator
#39

The next question comes from Andres Toome from Green Street.

Andres Toome

analyst
#40

I just wanted to inquire a little bit more on your reported valuations. Firstly, just looking at it the change hasn't been that material over the last sort of almost a year. So when you're looking at your peer group, valuation declines are somewhere in the 10-plus percent range for the most part and then also the data that comes from some of these companies that do appraisals from you suggest that yields are out quite a bit in your markets. So can you help us square that against just your own reported valuation that just doesn't seem to move at all?

Erik Selin

executive
#41

I mean this is a lot of different parts. So I don't know exactly the peer group. I mean, I think it's always different companies and maybe you should have it over a longer time period. But I mean, for example, you have the Danish market where prices actually are plus 8% year-on-year. So it's a big difference within the portfolio if you look at only those apartments. So it's a lot of different sums. And I think it will never happen that all the companies have the same writings or down writings. I mean, there are always big differences if you look at short time periods.

Andres Toome

analyst
#42

So are you saying that in Denmark, your valuation is anchored to owner occupiers' apartments not in investment kind of product institutional part?

Erik Selin

executive
#43

No, I'm not saying that as we own only owners apartments, and looking at that market the prices are actually up but we don't take that in, but it's an interesting observation because if we want to, we can still sell it at owners apartment. I mean, so there's a [indiscernible].

Andres Toome

analyst
#44

But you're operating rental apartments, right?

Erik Selin

executive
#45

Yes, but it is owners apartment as we operate them as renters.

Andres Toome

analyst
#46

And then, I guess, other parts of Nordic, I mean, in Helsinki there are some comparables or pending comps where sort of yields are in the high 4% in Sweden always as well. Just looking again on some of these companies that do your appraisals, they've moved out yields quite a lot. So these are not in conjunction, I guess, with your own reported yields then, just wondering why is that?

Erik Selin

executive
#47

We have the same external valuation in our company as in, for example, [indiscernible]. So it's the same firm, the same person.

Andres Toome

analyst
#48

But [ Kojamo ] have marked down their values by about 10%, right?

Erik Selin

executive
#49

Yes, but they also marked it up a lot more before so we still have lower valuation compared to them if you look at the numbers.

Andres Toome

analyst
#50

Okay. So my next question, maybe coming back to Jan's question again on the earnings capacity, just trying to understand, I suppose, how is the profit from property management for the associated companies actually going up in the earnings capacity whilst your own profit from property management estimate in the earnings capacity is coming down? So what's different in your own company structure versus the associated companies that there's a diverging trend there?

Erik Selin

executive
#51

It's a group of companies, and this is very small changes. So this is sort of our view when we look at it. There's very small changes.

Andres Toome

analyst
#52

Okay. And my last question is just trying to understand also a bit more on the financing side. How are debt financing spreads or credit spreads for -- in the banking market, how have they evolved in sort of last 3 to 6 months as you are looking to increase your lending also towards the banking market?

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#53

I would say it hasn't happened that much actually for the last 3 to 6 months. It's pretty steady.

Andres Toome

analyst
#54

Can you give a bit of color [indiscernible] as where the margins stand for different property sector at the moment?

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#55

It's actually a little bit different between both banks and portfolios. They look at it in a little bit different ways, I would say. And, I mean, average margin for the bank loans that we make now are about 1.6.

Erik Selin

executive
#56

Yes, it depends also if it's a resi, commercial, LTV, how long time the loan, so there's a lot of different parameters there.

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#57

Yes, and from bank to bank.

Erik Selin

executive
#58

Yes. But I think that's maybe a good guess for the average.

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#59

Yes.

Andres Toome

analyst
#60

Okay. And the last question, just around the development organization. Obviously, you've cut down quite a bit your project development ambitions as well and being elsewhere, how developers are cutting headcount quite aggressively. Just wondering how much potential is there for Balder to reduce the size of your development organization and how much it could help on the cost side.

Erik Selin

executive
#61

Yes, that will be adjusted as we go along. So if it's decreasing, we decrease it, and it's been decreasing a bit already, but it's -- I mean, we adjust -- we adjust regularly if it's needed to adjust.

Operator

operator
#62

As a reminder, if you wish to [Operator Instructions]. There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments.

Ewa Wassberg

executive
#63

Thank you all for listening and have a nice day. Bye.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Fastighets AB Balder (publ) transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Fastighets AB Balder (publ) earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.