Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 24, 2021

New York Stock Exchange US Financials Capital Markets conference_presentation 33 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#1

Good morning, everyone. Let's get started. This is Craig Siegenthaler from Credit Suisse, and it's my pleasure to introduce Chris Donahue from Federated Hermes. Chris is the firm's President, CEO and a Director. And he was initially named CEO back in 1998, which makes him one of the longest-tenured CEOs in the asset management industry. Chris' father, Jack Donahue, started Federated in Pittsburg in 1955. Chris, it's great to have you here with us.

John Donahue

executive
#2

Well, thank you, Craig. It's a pleasure to be here.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#3

So Federal Hermes is a diversified asset manager with more than $600 billion of AUM and over $1.3 trillion in assets under advisory. The firm is best known for its money market franchise, which now manage more than $420 billion of AUM and for its acquisition of Hermes in 2018, which boosted its business in equities, fixed income and alternatives.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#4

Okay, let's begin the fireside. In 2018, Federated made a transformational decision by agreeing to buy a majority stake in Hermes Investment Management, a U.K.-based asset manager, with a sizable alternatives business. Chris, how is the integration of this business fared? And can you talk about what trended better and also worse than you expected?

John Donahue

executive
#5

Well, thank you, Craig. Yes, the -- I like the use of that word, transformational. And I call it a reverse transformational merger where we wanted to bring many of the strong features of Hermes, its heritage in ESG, in particular, to marry up with our fiduciary heritage. And so this reverse transformational merger has worked really much better than some could have anticipated. Last year, just pre-COVID, we changed the name to Federated Hermes, Inc. and got a new sticker -- ticker symbol, and we have renamed all of our products all across the globe. In addition, we opened up our own responsible investing office for getting authentic ESG integration throughout the investment operations here in the U.S., and we have succeeded in that. And it is because of the driving philosophy that sustainable wealth is built through responsible investing. So that reverse transformational merger type stuff is what's worked really well. The people have worked well also. We had over 5 years of cultural due diligence to talk to the people and figure out if this could work, and it has. I'll just tell you one little feature of that is that both companies use the example of each individual has his or home dignity and gets to paying his or her own picture. And this helps analyze a lot of things inside the company. And that dignity also lends itself to the pledge, which Hermes had a pledge, we accepted a few of the English spellings of some of the words and then adopted the pledge here as well. On the product side, we've introduced 6 new products that now have 136 or so million in them. And it's still in the first inning. They're both funds, and we have some SMAs. So that's gone along pretty well. Last year, we completed the acquisition of control of the private markets businesses, the real estate and the private equity, infrastructure, et cetera. And we can talk about those later, but getting control of those is very important, and we were happy to do that. Another star in terms of things that have worked better than expected is the EOS at Federated Hermes, which, yes, as you mentioned, we ended the year at $1.3 trillion, but are now happily over $1.4 trillion, having added some more clients to that asset under advisement monitor. And this supplies us with great data, forward-looking ability to make judgments, a team of now 67 people. And it is a very, very much of a star in terms of engaging and setting things up for the future. Some areas where maybe some more things are needed. Well, in the fourth quarter after the acquisition, the emerging markets had its one of its cyclical dips. And that didn't help the AUM. That, of course, is bouncing back. So we're happy to see that. Another thing that needs more work is selling some of the stuff from the U.S. across the globe. And we combined our Asia Pac Group with Hermes International Asia Pac Group. And we're opening -- opened up an office in Sydney, Australia. On other parts of the globe, we've opened one in Madrid, hired an individual for our Latin America efforts. And we expect to see some more of the U.S. products sold in those jurisdictions. And we have good leads on some efforts in trade finance in short-term type mandates there. So that's pretty much a rundown of what I could think of right now for where we've done better than average and where we need to do some more work.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#6

So Chris, instead of looking back now, let's look forward on M&A. As you and the Board evaluate your business today, what do you see as the biggest product holes? And do you think M&A could be used to fill these holes?

John Donahue

executive
#7

Well, the answer is, yes, M&A can be used, but it's usually on a smaller basis. The biggest product holes to get to that part of your question, are really ETFs. And as you know, we're working hard on those and hope by midyear to have some of those products up and running. Another hole would be a muni-SMA, and that could be handled through an acquisition and other things like that. We continue to look for bolt-ons and additions where relevant, and -- but we are really committed to being organic type growers. And so yes, M&A would be looked at by us as that type of operation, not so much get more size and do synergy. And to me, synergies is way of shooting people, and it's not as much fun as organic growth.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#8

So Chris, if you look outside of Federated, we've seen a large increase in both asset manager transactions and also speculation around M&A. And so I wanted to know what is your thought on this trend and do you really expect it to continue over the next few years?

John Donahue

executive
#9

Craig, I do expect to continue. And the reason is that it has always been so. There's always new entrants. There's always things happening. And there are a couple of other features to it that are now new that we'll continue to prod these trends. One is regulation. One of the effects of regulation is oligopolization. Whether you like it or not, are you going to lament all the regulations, but that's one of the things they do is oligopolies because they make it harder for new people to get in or old people to hang in there. Another one that operates similarly is the pandemic. And just like you've seen the big boxes be able to survive better than the smaller companies, you're seeing that true here as well. And so these things still continue. What we believe is that an operation that is designed around a franchise for all seasons that has all sorts of opportunities to grow under any circumstances is where the strength lies. And that's the space that we occupy.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#10

So Chris, let's move on to your alternatives business. It's roughly $20 billion of AUM, spans across real estate, infrastructure, private equity. Can you talk about your long-term growth prospects in this segment?

John Donahue

executive
#11

I'd be delighted to, Craig. The -- basically, this whole operation could be as big as the current operation that we have right now. I notice, I don't put a time line on that or divide the money up among all the various segments. But if you think about the real estate, okay, it's U.K.-centric. MEPC is the name of the entity that we bought control of, and they did this operation called King's Cross in Northern London that's just incredible. 67 acres, they get 50 buildings that have either been rehabbed or built new, 8 million square feet, 26 acres devoted to public space. All of this is done with a sustainable overlay and strong value creation. So I don't just tell you about King's Cross because we're proud of it, which we are, but because of what this organization does, and they're involved in other things in the U.K. as well. And we're figuring -- trying to figure out how to bring that over to the U.S. On HGPE, which includes the private equity and the infrastructure, they have about 8 billion in that -- by the way, it was 8 billion in real estate. So another 8 billion is in this area. And we have New York office. We're starting to make the calls on the dealers who deal in private equity. We're looking to get the existing clients to add into their existing positions on our PE offerings. We have had a great record, a thematic approach, and we are optimistic about being able to bring this stateside as well. One of the ones that you might see some numbers on faster than the others you're not expecting would be on direct lending. And this is something that we find quite interesting, and we're working on it. So that's a capsulized version, but it has enormous potential.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#12

So Chris, low interest rates are probably benefiting a lot of those businesses, but low interest rates may also -- not may -- they're hurting you right now via the fee waivers, but there are some offsets, distribution, expense offsets. Can you talk about the impact from the fee waivers and low rates today? And then also, how should we think about the benefits alternatively when the Fed starts hiking at?

John Donahue

executive
#13

Right. Well, you get right into the beauty of a franchise for all seasons because we try to structure this whole enterprise so that what happens with rates, what happens with pandemics, what happens in the world, we can still do a great job for our clients. So now specifically on the low rates. Yes -- and we told the Street at the call that we had gone from an announcement of $9 million a quarter for the fourth quarter of waivers to $14 million for Q1 of '21. And we're not changing that. In terms of the rates and having recently spoken with our people about this post-Powell testimony, our belief is that this stimulus is going to roll out by mid-March or so, and that'll lead to more T-bill issuance and supply. And so we'd expect 1 or 2 basis points of increase in rates to come from that. Moreover, we also believe that they're going to start moving the repo rates and the interest on excess reserve rates and move them by 5 basis points each, the repo from -- the reverse repo from 0 to 5 and the IOER from 10 to 15. And the reason is that they like to have a base of about 5 in the short-term money. It adds proper oil and grease to the mechanics. And so the low rates are here, and we don't think that they're going to change that or blink this year. We're well aware of all of the discussions of inflationary pressures and all of that. But now the second part of your question was, well, what happens when they start to raise rates again? Well, our experience is that the AUM goes up because you get more return on your cash. Obviously, the rates go up, the waivers go down, but don't forget, the cash is always looking for a warm and loving home. And we always have a warm and loving home for all the cash. So to us, you look at things like the increases in M2, money supply, stimulus, all of this is more money flopping around in the system that will want to find at least a temporary home with money funds.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#14

So if we think about the positive interest rate sensitivity in the money market franchise with the fee waivers and then you also have a value tilt in your equities business, do you just Federated is better positioned than most asset managers for a stronger economy and a higher rate backdrop?

John Donahue

executive
#15

Well, the -- let me just quibble with the value tilt. In our equity strategies, we have about $23 billion in the strategic value dividend mandate area, and we've got $23 billion in the growth area as well. Now MDT is kind of on both sides of that. So with that quibble, I would say that the strategic value dividend fund is peculiarly well situated for a rebound in value type stocks. It was up 4%, while the market was up 4%, and also pays a 4% dividend here in 2021. So we're looking for good things here, and we think that does position us. But the real positioning has to do with the fact that we have 40 funds of all varieties that have positive flows here in -- at the end of last year and still in the first quarter. They have excellent performance. And so you say, how are we set up? Well, it's this franchise for all seasons. If you look at our equity assets, they were just under $92 billion at year-end, and now they're just a hair under $98 billion. And if you look at the fixed income, we were $84 billion, now we're almost $88 billion. And yes, the -- on the liquidity side, in money markets overall, we've gone from 420 to 408. So that's down. But when you look at the flows, the equity flows so far this year remain positive with the funds being up more than the SMAs are slightly down. The fixed-income funds and SMAs are up well over $2 billion so that our net flows to date are about $2.25 billion. Now you're not allowed to multiply it by 6 and do all that kind of jazz. I don't know what's going to happen into the future, because if you do have uprates, fixed-income products sometimes don't do as well. Although on the high-yield side, we offer opportunistic high yield, which has equity in it, tips and then have the yield curve. So on the money funds, everybody knows that we've been committed to this business since the MI demand run if not to the contrary, and that we will fight them on the beaches to keep it going. And we're also bringing out micro-short funds. And I'm allowed to talk about these now because they're actually effective, so there's no gun-jumping, but these are between ultra-shorts and money markets. And the yields so far are right in between them and we have very strong interest from clients in these products. And I think they're going to do quite well. So that when you look at our positioning growth, value across the spectrum on fixed income and across the spectrum on money markets, I think we are extraordinarily well positioned as an asset manager.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#16

So I'm just going to remind the audience, we have about 20 minutes left, but if you have any questions, you can see Carin's e-mail. Please shoot an e-mail. We can get your question too. But Chris, let me continue here. So Federated has been one of the leaders in the money market business. They helped to innovate the product. It's more than half your AUM, but a smaller profit contributor. How has this business changed over the last 10 years? There's been some M&A by yourself and some of the other leaders. And what does the competitive landscape look like today?

John Donahue

executive
#17

Well, the way this business has changed over the last 10 years is that they're used to be well over 200 competitors in this business. Now if you look at the list, there's about 50, and only 10 of them compete for money. And so it has, in fact, oligopolized. Another big change that occurred with those amendments that were adopted in '14 and then implemented in '16, which basically eliminated the dollar in dollar out net at $1 net asset value in prime funds for institutions, and so you had $1.5 billion -- I mean, $1.5 trillion move out of prime and basically move into govies, a giant crowding out. And the muni funds weren't able to get to their previous peaks of about $500 billion. So that changed a lot. And I think what really happens there is that both clients and issuers are hurt. And it's not like they can't fund. The people always point out, well, municipal issuers can still issue. Yes, but they have to issue longer at higher rates. And you eliminate or diminish the ability of the marketplace at the spear point of the short-term market to price things properly, meaning when back in the day, there was a more robust short-term muni money market operation, we would compete against Fidelity and JPMorgan and Goldman for a $10 million piece of paper coming out of some municipality. And that just doesn't happen anymore. And so competitively, the situation is there are less of them, but they are very, very difficult competitors, very challenging, but it remains a very strong, resilient business.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#18

Got it. Chris, we actually have a question from the audience on flows. I know we're a little more than halfway through the first quarter, but are you able to provide us any update on fixed income flows and equity outflows?

John Donahue

executive
#19

As I mentioned, the fixed income flows to date, which is basically through February 19, were, on the fund side, $2.1 billion; and on the SMA side, a little bit more than that. So that you're basically $2.175 billion positive flows on fixed income when you add SMAs and funds. Then just to finish it out, on the equity side, the funds are up about 235, and the SMAs are down about 175 for about a 60 net positive on the equity side. And then those 2 combined, you can do the math, to put us over -- a little over $2.25 billion positive for the time frame ending February 19.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#20

Got it. Very helpful. And just to be clear, that includes the mutual fund numbers that we can track as in the SMAs, which we can't track.

John Donahue

executive
#21

That's correct. But not big institutional separate accounts.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#22

Okay.

John Donahue

executive
#23

That's -- okay. This is what we call retail and what you -- what the street generally calls retail.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#24

Got it. All right. Very helpful, Chris. Let's move on to capital management. We've seen a wide variety of capital deployment activity from Federated over the years, and this includes special dividend. You're arguably more aligned than many CEOs with shareholders given your stock ownership, but what should we expect for capital returns to shareholders in 2021?

John Donahue

executive
#25

So naturally, you're not going to get any numbers, but what you are going to get is repeat the sounding joy of what we've done in the past. I mean, to date, since we went public, which was '98, which you mentioned, we've paid out -- or had about $4.4 billion, and we've used it with about $2.5 billion going in dividends and about $1.3 billion in share buybacks and $1.1 billion in acquisitions. And I'm not going to tell you that ratio stays the same because it's very lumpy if you look at the history, but our attitude is we love the dividends. The highest and best use is acquisitions where we think we can grow. And we like share buybacks because we like the price of the shares at various times. So we will continue to score on all 3 streets, and it's very difficult to then separate that into specific numbers.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#26

Got it. So I wanted to turn it over to succession plan. Chris, it's pretty impressed that you've been CEO of Federated since 1998. I was in high school at that time. But I want to understand what is the succession plan at Federated and how do you and your brother fit into that plan too?

John Donahue

executive
#27

So as I mentioned on the call, it's partly really the New York Stock Exchange rules, so will we do this anyway. And then as I spent the better part of an hour talking to our independent directors of FHI about succession. And what we do is that each one of my discussions with my direct report includes the question what happens if you get hit by a bus. They ask me the same question. And my answer to that is that we have several executives on the executive staff who are perfectly well qualified to come in and do what I do. And if you look at them, the -- I don't know what the average is, but it's many decades with this company. So it's not a bunch of newbies that are here that would have the capacity to take over if I get hit by a bus. Tom, of course, is the CFO. And he and I share the A voting stock with my mother. So that's a pretty tight group. And in terms of planning as to when changes could be made, as we say about the pandemic, those kinds of decisions will get made based on conditions, not on the calendar. Now that doesn't mean I'm going to be around forever, but it does mean that right now, there's a lot of fun. I'm enjoying it. I'm in really good health, and we have a lot of really good things going on to enhance this franchise for all seasons.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#28

Chris, we had another question from an investor listening in. LIBOR levels have come down since the guidance you provided on the 4Q call for 1Q fee waivers. How does that impact the guidance for fee waivers?

John Donahue

executive
#29

It does not change it because, as I mentioned earlier, our people believe that even though those rates came down in this, call it, the February 12, '19, '20, and those numbers, okay, those are temporary things. And we actually believe that with this stimulus, if it comes in, in mid-March, you're going to get a couple of those basis points back. And we really do believe that they're going to raise the reverse repo rate and the IOER by 5 each, which will help as well. And with these features then add into that grand mosaic of an enormous number of assumptions to come up with the $14 million waiver number for Q1, and we're sticking with it.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#30

Got it. I had a question on the regulatory side. With every administration, especially when the party flips, we get some new regulatory heads in Washington. And there's maybe potential to some of the initiatives that were started over the last 5, 6 years. I'm just wondering, do you expect any significant changes out of Washington to your core asset management business or anything special on the money market side? I know there's kind of stricter requirements there, too, for liquidity that we saw probably 5 or 6 years ago now.

John Donahue

executive
#31

Well, the President's working group came up with a report recently, which basically was the night of the living dead. They brought up all the zombies, which we had dispatched before, and pretended as if they had never been dispatched. So we will have to run through that again. One thing that they recognized was a problem was linking the 30% liquidity -- weekly liquidity with decisions about fees and gates on money funds, and that that triggered more problems than it ever solved. And so I think there's a real good shot that, that gets changed because that would basically enhance the whole effort. So I do expect more regulation, and we'll get a swing at the pitch. But what's really going on underneath is that the clients and the issuers in the capital markets have great standing, and I think that pervades the money market business and the other business as well. And so despite some people's tendencies to want to grab all the money they see in pots, rational things will obtain. And I'll give you one example of where this is a factor. I mentioned the President's working group, but the ICI has a really good report about the facts. And the facts are that the dislocations that occurred in March last year occurred first and primarily in Treasury bonds, long-term U.S. government agencies, corporate bonds and foreign exchange, all things that the money market funds don't play with. And those spreads all widened before you saw any redemption activity in the funds. Now these are 2 very good facts for the point that there were no credit issues, and the money market funds were very resilient. And what triggered the only problem was this silly 30% rule, which we and others had cautioned them not to do. So that's just one example where I think reflection and good factual analysis will get us to a good result.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#32

Got it. Chris, we have another question from someone in the audience. If you look at the long-term return of the Federated stock, you had earnings growth, but like other asset managers, there's been some multi-rating. So a lot of the return is driven by the dividend. If you look at sort of the prospects going forward and starting at a lower point for evaluation, how do you think those dynamics to trend kind of going forward on a longer-term basis?

John Donahue

executive
#33

We are very confident of our dividend. And as you see from our history, periodically, we put a special into the mix. And so we have a lot of confidence in the underlying earning power of this franchise for all seasons. So I can't guarantee things about dividends and things like that, but as I like to say, when we went public in '98, one of the first questions they asked me was, well, "Gee whiz, our shareholder is going to get a fair shape" And I said, I enjoy going to Thanksgiving dinner even during COVID time. And since all of my family is in on the deal, paying the dividend is a very important thing. That's a foxy way of explaining our attitude about dividends, but it does reflect the underlying confidence in the business model. And so all of these activities that we're funding for the future are being funded out of this franchise for all seasons without taking pauses on the dividend.

Craig Siegenthaler

analyst
#34

Got it. And Chris, with that, we are out of time. But I just wanted to thank you on behalf of myself and everyone at Crédit Suisse for joining our conference and hope you take care and stay healthy. Thank you, Chris.

John Donahue

executive
#35

Thank you, Craig. All the best.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Federated Hermes, Inc. transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Federated Hermes, Inc. earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.