Fortive Corporation (FTV) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 16, 2020

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Machinery conference_presentation 39 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Hello, everyone, and welcome to the Wolfe industrials Virtual Conference. We have Fortive Energy on our fireside chat, and I'll pass it over to Nigel to begin our introduction.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#2

Yes. Well, thanks, Danielle. There's lots of energy at Fortive, but there's no energy assets. So it's Fortive. It's just Fortive. So it's Fortive, and we've got the team here. We've got Jim Lico, CEO; and Chuck McLaughlin, CFO. Gents, thanks for your time. Jim, I know you want to make some opening remarks. But before that, I do want to say to the people on the webcast, if you have a question, please feel free to lock that question in the box or e-mail us at coeteam@wolferesearch.com, and we'll get through your questions as time allows. Jim, thanks for the time, and over to you.

James Lico

executive
#3

Yes. Thanks, Nigel. We'll just take a few minutes here to say hello to everybody and good morning. Good to be with everybody, even though it's virtually. I think we all long for the day when we get a chance to be together, but I think this venue, hopefully, will be good for all of us. Yes. I think it's -- obviously, a lot going on at Fortive in 2020. We had a lot to -- we just completed the Vontier separation in October, as many of you know. Feel very good about that. I know Mark and Dave and the team were presenting just before us, so great to see them off and running. And I think we're in a very good position. I think when we try to talk about here over the last month or so is the new segmentation that we're going forward with. I think as we talked through the day, have an opportunity to go into that in a little bit more depth, I think what you'll hear from us is real excitement on the part of Chuck and I around these segments, the opportunities within those segments to really continue to build the company and really in ways that really what we've tried to do over the last 4, 4.5 years since we went public back in 2016. So we feel like we're off to a great start, but I think what we see in the new segmentation in really 3 segments: Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technology and Advanced Health Care Solutions, 3 segments with wonderful opportunities, wonderful served markets in which we play and lots of degrees of freedom, both organically and inorganically, to build the businesses over time. So I'll leave that -- that's pretty much the opening. I think at this point, we -- Chuck and I would love to take questions and certainly continue the dialogue. So Nigel, I'll hand it back to you.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#4

All right. Great segue. I mean I actually wanted to kick off with the new segmentation. And I mean, to my mind, it seemed very natural, very sort of sensible and logical the way you've organized businesses. But I'm just curious, is this the way you've been managing the businesses internally for some time? Or has there been some heavy lifting to reorganize the structure? And I'm also curious because, obviously, you've got Fluke and IOS, and then we have Fluke health care in health care. So I'm just wondering if that's the way the businesses were managed internally.

James Lico

executive
#5

Yes. For about the last year, we've been in those -- mostly those management structures, a couple of exceptions in small businesses. But as we look at the leadership of those businesses today going forward, those leaders have been running those businesses for at least a year. But I would say 95% to 98% of that goes well beyond 1 year and really into the last couple of years. So I think from a structural perspective, we've got segment leaders who are running the businesses, have depth of knowledge in the businesses. And I think going forward, we're well positioned to lead the businesses for the future.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#6

So let's put inorganic growth to one side and just think about the organic potential here for the new Fortive. 39% recurring revenues, 13% software mix right now. Obviously, those have gone higher. But you've got -- you've characterized the old Fortive core growth as sort of 4% to 5%. What is the new core growth potential for new Fortive? And how does that look by business?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#7

Yes. So I think we -- I think what we've characterized Fortive before was kind of a GDP, GDP plus kind of growth rate, probably a little bit less than 4% to 5%, probably in the -- I'd call that maybe the 3% to 4% range depending on the year. I think as we see it going forward, mid-single digit, for sure, with, I think, strong growth in Intelligent Operating Solutions and Advanced Health Care, probably a little bit lower on Precision Tech, still opportunities, though, to build that growth rate. But as you know, we've done most of our M&A in those other 2 segments, which has really been very beneficial to really accelerating, not only the organic growth rate, but also the durability of the revenue with much higher recurring revenue and more software in those places. So still plenty of opportunity to do that across the portfolio, however.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#8

Okay. I didn't want to get into M&A just yet, so I'll put it to one side for now. But -- so when I think about the margins in the new segments, we've got -- I think Precision Tech is -- and health care slightly at the lower end, 20%, the low 20s. And then we have IOS in the mid-20s. What do you think is the margin potential longer term for these segments? Do you think they can all be aspirationally in the high 20s? Or do you think, naturally, I don't know, Precision Tech might be a little bit lower over time? And how do you see that progressing?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#9

Nigel, I think that we have -- we feel we have really good margin opportunities in all of our businesses. Right now, what you're probably referring to is the supplemental financials that we put out. Keep in mind that we're just a little bit COVID impaired here, and so I would expect that all of these businesses will continue to expand margins, some a little faster than others, depending on how quick the top line growth. But getting into the high 20s is really possible for all these segments.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#10

Okay. I do want to provide a time frame for that, Chuck, go ahead. But I assume you won't. So we'll carry on. So I mean, one question that's on a lot of investors' minds right now is how the world changes post-COVID and how well positioned businesses are for the new world? How do you think your business and portfolio is set up for what you view as the most likely post-COVID setup?

James Lico

executive
#11

Yes. I think we're well set up. If we think about, first, the durability of the businesses, maybe even within COVID, a number of the businesses, as we talked about in the third quarter, our SaaS parts of our software businesses grew mid-single digit. Software, in general, was around flattish. So I think that you really -- you see the durability there, even in a very difficult time. As we get through into next year, I think what you see is clearly some nice tailwinds and things like health -- environmental health safety, which is a very good business with Intelex, and I see -- and obviously, that's going to be a critical thing for companies going forward. If you look at our Accruent, Gordian business in facilities and asset management, obviously, workplace management, our hoteling solutions, our product management and space management solutions there, are going to be critically important as people start to consider what coming back to the office looks like and the flexibility they're going to need. Obviously, space is going to change, and we have solutions for that. Certainly, on sterilization is going to be a critical part of everything going on in health care. So I think when you look across the portfolio, a number of themes that go beyond certainly are probably slightly accelerated by some of the changes. And of course, the digital transformation that companies like ourselves and others are really reconsidering. Certainly what we're doing today, certainly falls into that. Certainly, things we're doing at Fluke in condition monitoring, as an example, in industrial IoT. And our sensing businesses are really starting to play even far more from an IoT perspective. So I think we're well positioned. Timing is -- if you look over the next few years, I think the world certainly changes. Some of it stays the same. And as business comes back, that will also be an aspect of the business. But we really feel like we've pivoted the business around a number of places that are going to take -- really going to take advantage of some of the secular drivers that exists sort of in a post-COVID world.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#12

So to be clear, I mean, Gordian, Accruent, you think that there's more good news in a post-COVID world as it relates to property management, space management then there might be some impairment from lower construction activity, lower renovation spend, et cetera.

James Lico

executive
#13

Yes. I think, Gordian -- as I think we've said, Gordian has a couple of quarters here where the state and local budgets start to get a little bit constrained. But I think at the end of the day, the -- we had such great growth there over the last couple of years that when we look at the position of the business and where it's at, we feel very good about it. And as I said, people are going to be reevaluating workspace, and that really is -- we're really not in the new construction, new building phase of the world. We're really around managing current assets. And I think what we're going to see is the challenges of coming back to work and all the things that will be inevitably -- building flexibility into office space is fundamentally a good driver for us in those businesses.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#14

Okay. Great. So you've provided a little bit of color on 4Q. Last week, you've provided a bit more color on the new segmentation performance. I think it was low single-digit growth in the IOS and Precision and I think low double-digit growth in health care. Any color you can provide on kind of like what's been changing from 3Q into 4Q? And I'm curious, with the lockdowns that are spreading in Europe, is that causing a bit more uncertainty or a little bit more concern amongst you managers?

James Lico

executive
#15

I think, as we said, we updated what we thought for the quarter, which is really just affirmed what we had said. I think at the end of the day, we saw a big change from Q2 to Q3, obviously, as people came back to work. We didn't anticipate any massive change from Q3 to Q4, and I think what we've seen is that playing out. We certainly are watching a lot of the things you just described, right, relative -- but I think at the end of the day, what we're seeing mostly is most of our customers at this point are essential workers. And so in the sense of what's really happening, really less impact, probably doesn't mean a big trajectory upward, which is we didn't plan that. And so I think what we're seeing is mostly pretty consistent with what we thought. We're monitoring elective procedures as one example. But I think at the end of the day, what we said was industrial activity needed to continue. We didn't expect a big step-up. I think we continue to see most of those metrics be slightly better in Q4. We said elective procedures didn't need to get much better from where they were in Q3 to really sort of hit, and that's really what we're seeing. And I think when we consider that, Nigel, it's very much about the idea that hospitals, not only do they need to maintain elective procedures from a financial perspective. The hospitals are in a much better place in which to deal with the challenges than they were, say, 6 or 7 months ago. But there's also the health care aspect of this, right? I mean you can only -- patients can only delay a lot of these elective procedures for a long period -- for a short period of time. And so I think the health care industry is also trying to make sure that they can do that in a safe way, just to make sure that we don't go 9 to 12 months of patients not being able to have these procedures. So I think -- I don't think we see a dramatic increase in elective procedures anytime soon, but I think we're in that -- around that number that we anticipated we would be for the rest of the quarter.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#16

Right. Yes. I'm not sure hip replacement is truly an elective procedure, but I think that it's more timing than anything else. So assuming that we get a vaccine hitting sometime in the first quarter, second quarter, maybe some normality hitting by the second half of next year, do you think there we're out of the woods here? Do you think that we're in a new sort of IP GDP cycle from here? Is that how you're viewing the world? Is that how you're planning your investment cycle?

James Lico

executive
#17

I think, right now, we've got a number of scenarios that we're working through. I would say the base-level scenario is probably -- obviously, we'll get to a guide here at some point in time when we have a better sense of how the year finishes, which is always really important, I think gives you a good understanding. The trajectory in the fourth quarter is as good a marker, if you will, for how the first quarter and the first half really starts, particularly globally. I think we're watching all those things I described. So I would say we certainly think things will continue to get better with vaccines, antivirals, but I think our base case would not necessarily be any anticipation of thing -- a big trajectory change before -- certainly before the second half. So we'll see things play out. We'll get to how we see the year pretty quickly here. I suspect we'll be in January before we know it. But I think at this point, we've got -- I think we're in scenario planning still. I think that -- so maybe that's as much maybe an answer as anything is that we're building things around scenarios as opposed to having an underlying confidence that we know exactly how next year is going to play out.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#18

No, let's bring on January. Let's get 2020 in the [indiscernible] this year. A couple more maybe before we get on to some of the longer-term structural issues here. But channel inventories and your channel partners can swing results around from quarter-to-quarter. I'd just be curious to know what sort of behavior you're seeing from your channel partners. Are they sort of -- are they now rightsized? Are they starting to restock a little bit here? I mean what are you seeing from those?

James Lico

executive
#19

Yes. We're not seeing a lot of restocking. I think we've seen we have -- in our shorter-cycle businesses like Fluke and Tech, we have these -- we have pretty good channel inventory information, good point-of-sale information. Those things -- the point-of-sale numbers continue to get a little bit better, so I think that's certainly how we think about things. I think channel inventories, by and large, are in the right place. I haven't -- I don't think we've seen anything where we're seeing people wanting to anticipate taking on any big inventory positions. But Nigel, I think that's also fairly typical. I think when we -- if I think back to -- it goes back -- '08, '09, goes back a little ways. But over time, when you start to see some of this uncertainty, we don't typically -- and at least in our equipment, we don't typically see a big restocking quickly. I think that tends to be a little bit later thing. So I think we're certainly cognizant of the data to make sure that we don't see any behavior that would necessarily give us -- tell us one way or the other. And I think right now, as we've said probably for the last 30 to 60 days is that things have been relatively stable in that environment.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#20

Okay. Great. That's good. Moving to software. And your -- I think your software businesses last quarter were pretty flat overall. I think the SaaS businesses were growing mid-single digits or so. Growth algorithm, going forward, let's say, it's mid-single-digit growth or GDP-plus growth for the new Fortive. Do we think about the software businesses as being maybe 2 or 3 points above that with maybe SaaS in the double-digit range? How do we think about that algorithm?

James Lico

executive
#21

Yes. I mean every business has a slightly different profile. I think if you were to average it out, we're certainly in the high singles and maybe even touching double digit when you start to look at some of the businesses as we get into what I would call a normal environment here. We certainly are -- we have some businesses that are more SaaS than others. So as we said, Intelex, eMaint is an example, Censis, more -- probably more SaaS revenue there. Whereas an Accruent, as an example, has a little bit more professional services, slightly larger installation, so a little bit more professional services, a little bit still conversion relative to licenses as well. So I think when you average that all out, great businesses, great business models, but probably in that high single digit is a good planning time horizon. And as we've said, we continue to see the benefits of that also on the durability side, which I think just continues -- will continue to be a larger part of our portfolio over time as those businesses outgrow the rest of Fortive.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#22

Yes. So maybe a point of accretion per year in terms of the mix. Where are we, though, on that SaaS migration? And I don't know if you want to get into it business by business, but where is the SaaS mix today as a proportion of that 12%, 13% number you threw out? And where do you think that goes? And maybe just touch on what that does to the margin profile, the sort of [indiscernible], maybe even the growth profile?

James Lico

executive
#23

Yes. We tag team that a little bit. I'll talk about the growth. About 2/3 of our software business today is SaaS. That will definitely continue to grow. As I mentioned, businesses like eMaint and Intelex probably have the largest part of their business. We'll never get to 100%. You're always going to find that there's a part of our portfolio that maybe customers don't want to convert. But more importantly, there's always a maintenance and a professional services stream that's sort of associated with some of this. Censis has some of that as well. So I'd say, if we said 2/3 today, a couple of years from now, we're probably have 3 quarters. So it will continue to be. I don't know if it ever gets to 80% -- probably at its top end, it might get to 80%. But as we continue to add things into the portfolio, maybe that number is always in and around the 70s. That's probably a decent range for us, I suspect.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#24

Okay.

James Lico

executive
#25

[indiscernible] maybe.

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#26

And with the growth, I think that these parts of the businesses are growing faster than the average. So you think that without M&A, that will -- it will still naturally start becoming a bigger piece. But it's in the low teens now, total software. So that will move up. But what will really maybe change that a little bit is depending on how M&A plays out and the timing of that, whether we do recurring revenue or a software deal.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#27

Okay. And then maybe talk about when you buy some of these businesses, and I'm thinking about eMaint, et cetera, what do you do to improve these businesses or change the focus of these businesses? How do you integrate across the portfolio, maybe globalize them? I mean how do you improve these businesses when you buy them?

James Lico

executive
#28

Well, I think we've known for some time how FBS, the Fortive Business System, can be applied to software. Even when software wasn't a huge part of the portfolio, particularly on the product development side, we've had a lot of software development going on in Fortive for a number of years. 2/3 of our engineers at Tektronix, which is our largest engineering organization in the world, is our software engineer. So the product development aspects of FBS have always been tuned. Agile software tools, things like that have been always attuned to being a part of the improvement aspects of the business. So I think when we -- so that's certainly it. I think the other aspect of it is just the sort of core FBS tools around problem solving and the accountability and way we run businesses is very applicable to software businesses. In some cases, it's even better because you get more data, right? I mean you get real-time customer data of usage. When you have telemetry, you can understand how customers are using your product in ways that, quite frankly, we almost never had in decades in some of our other business -- in our hardware businesses. So I think the idea of problem solving and some of the things we're doing around really trying to really improve those businesses is really accelerated in problems in some of the software businesses. So I think that's -- those are certainly some of the areas. We've adapted a number of the things, as we've talked to you and many others over the last few years, around how we've continued to move our innovation model differently. And we've applied that into some of the new businesses, so we'll start to see some of that. We've really focused on data analytics, as an example. A lot of our corporate effort on data analytics or what we call The Fort has, quite frankly, been working in a number of our software businesses to accelerate their move from software to software and data analytics. Accruent just launched their second version of Accruent analytics, as an example, on that platform and bringing more data into that. So that's -- the way you improve the businesses may seem different, but a number of the aspects of it are the same. And of course, we're buying high-quality businesses. So at the end of the day, we're also taking a number of things that we've learned from those businesses and applying it appropriately into some of the other software businesses. Gordian has been a leader, quite frankly, in the use of FBS. And we've really benchmarked a lot of what they've done to apply to some of the businesses we bought after that. So I think that doesn't mean that there isn't a lot of improvement going forward. A lot of opportunity here going forward to continue to build continuous improvement into software businesses, just as we have in the legacy businesses over time.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#29

Excellent. And then before we get into M&A and portfolio, I did want to touch on incremental margins and maybe decremental margins because the iron rule has been -- mid-30s has been the rule of thumb for old Fortive. I know you've pointed to 35% decremental margins in 4Q. So I'm just curious, going forward, now that we're in a higher gross margin portfolio, you pushed up towards 60% gross margins, could those incrementals go higher over time or some of the reinvestment needs also rising as well?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#30

Yes. I'll take that one, Nigel. What we've said before is 30% to 35% in old Fortive. And now, we're talking about 35%, really, to get -- with all the moving pieces to give some clarity about how '21 is going to come out specifically or what we're managing to, remember, we've got some temporary things that are going to come back. We don't know the top line at this point. So that's a good place for us to be. But you're right, when we get to the other side of that into a normalized go forward, we'll reevaluate that, but we're very pleased with our gross margins coming up. And you would expect that instead of just going from 30% to 35%, staying 35%, it could go up higher. I think that's probably something that we'll be evaluating.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#31

Okay. That's great. Okay. Move on to portfolio now. And Jim, I think you've been extremely active on the portfolio since separation from Danaher, probably a bit more active than we would have expected, not just on the buy side, but also divestments as well. Is this now the portfolio that you're happy with? Is this the portfolio you can live with for the next 5 years? Or do you still see scope for 1 or 2 disposals?

James Lico

executive
#32

No. I think we really -- I think as we laid out the 3 segments with roughly $30 billion worth of served market opportunity, we feel very good about the opportunities within all 3 segments. And as you said, we just finished a few weeks ago a fairly rigorous strategic session with our Board, where we talked about the opportunities within -- both organically and inorganically over the next 10 years. And I think we're incredibly excited about the potential for all 3 segments. So never say never because, obviously, if things change in the market, and that's why we do strategic planning every year, but incredibly excited about really what we have in front of us and the opportunities really to not only -- a lot of the inorganic opportunities get a lot of play, but I think we've done a lot on the organic side. So Precision Tech, as an example, has not seen as much of the M&A capital. But we've done some nice things, really excited about a number of the things that are starting to play out in a number of those businesses organically. Obviously, Tek has been a leader in innovation over the last 4 years, while we've been out on our own. And Sensing Tech, the sensing businesses, I think, have done an outstanding job here in the last couple of years of really repositioning their business organically with a number of IoT-type technologies that I think are going to really help those businesses in the years to come.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#33

So that -- I was actually going to go there. The next question is really that we've seen a huge amount of activity in IOS and health care, and Precision Tech hasn't had the same degree of inorganic investments. It sounds like you're more excited by the organic investments still in Precision Tech than inorganic. Is that the case? And where I'm going with this is sensing is an extremely fragmented market, huge market. You're a very, very niche player. Could that be an area where we start seeing some acquisitions?

James Lico

executive
#34

It could be, yes. I think what why talked about the organic is simply because we put it in the context of a lot of the inorganic and organic work that's gone on in the other 2 segments, so maybe it's more the response of that question than it is really the excitement. As I always joke, we love -- I have 3 children, and I love all my children equally, the same way in our segments. So the opportunities are the opportunities will become available, and we think there's opportunities throughout the portfolio. Now we really are trying to position the company towards more enduring higher growth, more durable revenue. And so I think as we continue to look through, that doesn't mean just software. But as we see, ASP was a large hardware acquisition. So it doesn't -- but we are looking at places where we have the drivers for growth over time and continue to improve the durability, and I think we have opportunities to do that throughout the portfolio.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#35

Okay. I think to the 2020, we probably had one of the longest periods of very limited to no acquisition, no transactions and for good reason. Delivered the balance sheet nicely. Obviously, we've got some proceeds coming in from the remaining bonds here, sell-down. How much patience is there at this point in terms of building the pipeline aspirations to start deploying some of that capital that's built back up again? How patient are you here?

James Lico

executive
#36

Well, I think we're disciplined, and I think that leads to patience -- those 2 are almost hand-in-hand. I think at the end of the day, certainly, COVID is -- we have been busy. So we've certainly looked at a number of things. Our -- your question around the funnels, they continue to be interesting and exciting. But I think on the other hand, we're going to -- we know what good looks like. And I think we want to make sure that if we're going to add something going forward, we're going to do that in a way that will really continues to build -- accelerate the strategies that we have available to us. And I think that leads to discipline and patience. So yes, I think, does that mean we -- do I think we'll do a deal soon? Yes, I think we will. But again, as you know, and this isn't -- we could certainly talk about the last 4.5 years. But I think Chuck and I could go back decades and say you always have time when -- M&A always ebbs and flows. That's just part of the deal. That's why we want to make sure we've got good organic and inorganic strategies, and I think we feel very good about both of those things. So we'll -- I'm sure we'll get some things done. But by the same token, we want to make sure that we're -- to use your word, we're patient, but we're also disciplined. And that's what we'll really do here, going forward, as we have been in the last 4 years.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#37

So I want to go back to -- going to Accruent because Accruent, for sure, the entry multiples there were obviously at the higher end of the range. With the benefit of another couple of years of S&P sort of inflation, those deals almost look like value deals in today's environment. So I'm just curious, with the S&P where it is right now, I mean, obviously, sellers' expectations have risen in parallel. I mean, is there a possibility of doing deals that aren't massively ROA -- that don't meet your ROA -- ROI criteria?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#38

Well, Nigel, I'd take that and say I think there's -- we have the base frame of trying to get to 10% in 3 years for both times and 5 years for more platform deals, and that's still a very good construct for us. I think that at a point in time where a couple of times, we've been willing to look a little longer on that, and that's probably still the case. But I -- if you've said no returns, and we -- I don't see that. Jim's comments around being -- us being disciplined, we're patient, I think there's -- we've seen a lot of things, and I think we're going to remain so.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#39

Okay. And maybe, Jim, give us a little bit of -- or even, Chuck, give us a little bit of color in terms of what you're seeing in your funnel right now. And I think we're also very keyed in on this, the kind of the software versus non-software. But obviously, you see the world very different to the way we do. But obviously, one of your sort of biggest industrial companies is increasingly waiting the software with some larger deals. Is that the direction you see Fortive over time is doing much more larger software-centric deals?

James Lico

executive
#40

I think if we were to characterize the portfolio right now of opportunity, we would certainly see, Nigel, as I've talked over time, is breadth and depth, right? Breadth, meaning a number -- depth meaning size of deals, breadth meeting throughout the segments. And I would say the breadth and depth right now is very good. I don't think we're beholding to a couple of large deals. Rather, we see a number of opportunities. We've always talked about the fact that M&A is about accelerating strategy for us. So we're as likely to do probably a small, great technology deal as we are, maybe a larger deal that really accelerates us into a region, into a new platform or something like that. So I think what we've learned over the last 4 years is that managing that portfolio that way is -- we're in a good position if we do that. So I feel really good about what -- how that stands right now. And I think at the end of the day, it's really when we look at where we're coming from, these workflows that we've talked a little bit about, we'll continue to talk more about. Whether it's the EH&F workflows that exist in the organization or facilities and asset management or condition monitoring, based monitoring, which we have in IOS, or the perioperative loop and sterilization processes that go on in hospitals or the product development process that Tek plays in, these are great workflows. They've got large and small opportunities in which to play and as well as organic technology that we're all developing ourselves. And so we -- when we look across that, I think we've got plenty of opportunity in which to continue to build the company.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#41

Okay. Great. And then one of the great things -- one of the aspirations for being an acquisitive company, of course, to the companies to have a currency, equity currency that's valuable and essentially there to use. And certainly, post the Vontier spend, you've seen a re-rating in your stock. You're trading at north of 20x EBITDA, mid-20s on a PE basis. Does this raise the probability that you'd be open to using your equity as a currency here?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#42

I think that -- we've used some equity instruments before, and so we've always been open to that. Is it more likely? It just really depends on the deal and what we're trying to do and what the market dictates, but I don't think we would stay away particularly. But at the same time, we generate a lot of cash. And so we also don't want to pile up cash and have deployed equity, so it's a balance. It depends on the deal.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#43

Okay. And has your leverage aspirations changed at all now that you're a higher-margin [ therapy ] more stable company? Is that 3.5x still the right level? Or could you make a push a little bit higher?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#44

Well, you can -- could theoretically push a little higher, but I wouldn't say we aspire to get to that level. I think that's how we define how much capacity we have. And as -- again, it's just, if we get up there, then you'll want to see what we've done this year, which is go for smaller deals, bolt-ons and then delever back down because we're very committed to having -- maintaining our credit rating. We're in a very good position, a lot of options for us going forward right here, so we like that. But we're not -- I wouldn't say -- we're not timid, obviously, but we're not in a hurry. We're patient and disciplined, as Jim talked about.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#45

And then sticking on the balance sheet, Chuck, there's -- you've got some maturities in '21, '22 on some of the instruments. Any heavy lifting to do on the balance sheet in terms of refinancings or maybe replacing some of the equity instruments, anything to do that?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#46

No, no. There's a few things that we're -- we'll naturally settle out with the Vontier proceeds that were holding some short-term debt, even though we've got cash, doing the most tax-efficient way. So those things will easily be settled out. I think the mandatory convert in June just converts, and so that goes away. So it's nothing that we can't handle. And obviously, in this market, there's a lot of good options for us when we want to go into the bond market at the right time.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#47

And then just touching quickly on that one. Could that be one transaction theoretically? Or should we think of that as more of a series of transactions?

Charles McLaughlin

executive
#48

Well, I think, in theory, I obviously -- we've been studying that. We've got a few things that we've got to get done here procedurally to be even able to consider when we want to go what I've been saying is the first half of next year. But you've seen other of these types of deals, and they go out. And it can go in one or it can go in a short period of time. We really will evaluate the market when we get there and what's best for all our stakeholders. Remember that many of the Vontier shareholders are our shareholders. So we want to do something that makes sense for both of us.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#49

Okay. Great. And then we do have a couple of questions in the queue here. Maybe just one question given time. So Jim, what would you describe as your top priority -- your single top priority for 2021?

James Lico

executive
#50

I would say, well, we -- it's hard to have one. But I think at the end of the day, business as unique to ours, it's hard to have one. But I would say if you sort of said, what are we continuing to do that really start to think about what impacts all the businesses? I think number one is we continue to build the talent level of the organization continues to be a top priority. Obviously, we have a tremendous amount of growth opportunities within the portfolio. We can't do that without continuing to grow the talent base. In the COVID environment, that's slightly more difficult because we're not getting a chance to be in front of folks. I think our teams have done an outstanding job of continuing to build the talent base for the team. And business-wise, I think we've really built some outstanding capability around innovation. And I think we -- that's been some core development that we've done in terms of building capacity. We've built The Fort, which is our data analytics organization, which is really supporting all the businesses. And then our relationship and our partnership with Pioneer Square Labs has given us an early-stage innovation capability that we didn't have. So I would say it's really twofold. One is to build that talent base around the changing amounts of the -- changing things that are going on in the business. And secondly, if I were to say, it's continue to build on the innovation capability that we've been working on in the last couple of years.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#51

Yes. One priority is tough to do that. But I mean, that's not like a great closing statement. But any other closing remarks, Jim, before we draw line here?

James Lico

executive
#52

No. I just -- I would -- certainly thanks for the day. I mean it's -- the opportunity to spend time with everybody. I think, hopefully, you get a sense from Chuck and I's words. We're -- a lot of heavy lifting this year, 2020, now as we were joking about, but a challenging year for everyone in so many ways. But I think what we've been able to accomplish during that time frame in a number of ways, despite the planning horizon wasn't to do it all virtually, whether it be the Vontier spin, whether it be bringing the ASP business into the portfolio in the way we planned, certainly continuing to evolve our portfolio, all of those things done in a very challenging environment, I think, just speaks to the continued appropriateness of the Fortive Business System into how we do things. We couldn't have done it without that culture of continuous improvement, continues to be the sort of linchpin to our unique success. So we're excited about the future, and we certainly are excited every day when we can wake up and here there might be another vaccine out there. We're certainly continuing to watch those things, and we think we're well positioned certainly into 2021 no matter what the environment, and we're planning accordingly. So hopefully, people get a sense of that as well. So thanks for the time.

Nigel Coe

analyst
#53

Well, Jim, Chuck, the pleasure is all ours. Thanks for the time. You've been very active. So hopefully, maybe slow down a little bit going forward, perhaps. But you've been very active, doing a great job. Thanks for the time, and good luck.

James Lico

executive
#54

Thanks, Nigel. Great to see you. Thanks, everyone.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Fortive Corporation transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Fortive Corporation earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.