Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

February 12, 2020

NASDAQ US Consumer Discretionary Automobile Components m_and_a 34 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Operator

operator
#1

Greetings and welcome to Fox Factory Holdings Corporation SCA acquisition Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. David Haugen, General Counsel. Thank you. You may begin.

David Haugen

executive
#2

Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to Fox Factory's conference call to discuss our definitive agreement to acquire SCA Performance Holdings Inc. On the call today are Mike Dennison, Chief Executive Officer; and John Blocher, interim Chief Financial Officer. By now, everyone should have access to our press release, which went out today at approximately 4:05 p.m. Eastern Time. Please note the press release and a supplemental presentation are available on the Investor Relations portion of our website at www.ridefox.com. Please also note that throughout this call, we will refer to Fox Factory as Fox or The Company. Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that the prepared remarks contain forward-looking statements, and management may make additional forward-looking statements in response to your questions. Such statements involve a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside the company's control and can cause future results, performance or achievements to differ significantly from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors and risks that could cause or contribute to such differences are detailed in the company's latest Form 10-Q and in the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, the company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking or other statements herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Within this press release, Fox includes certain forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share. These forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures reflect management's current expectations and beliefs regarding the potential benefits of the proposed transaction. Fox is not able to reconcile forward-looking non-GAAP measures to meaningful comparative GAAP financial measures without unreasonable efforts. These non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or superior to, net earnings or other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP as more fully discussed in Fox' financial statements and filings with the SEC. And with that, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to our CEO, Mike Dennison.

Michael Dennison

executive
#3

Thanks, David, and good afternoon, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today at such short notice for the call. We are very excited to announce our definitive agreement to acquire SCA Performance Holdings, a leading specialty vehicle manufacturer for light-duty trucks and SUVs. To start, I'll provide an overview of the SCA business and our strategic rationale for the acquisition. And then John will review the financial highlights of the transaction, the impact to our 2020 outlook and give a brief update on our 2019 guidance. After that, we will open the call for your questions. We believe the acquisition of SCA presents a significant opportunity to further expand our performance-defining aftermarket solutions and continue to drive growth in our Powered Vehicles Group. As noted in today's press release, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of SCA Performance Holdings Inc. from Southern Rocky Holdings, LLC for $328 million with the acquisition to be financed through an expanded and syndicated credit facility. We expect the transaction to be accretive to Fox' fiscal 2020 results and fuel continued growth on a longer-term basis. Subject to customary closing conditions, we expect the transaction to close late in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. SCA is headquartered in Trussville, Alabama, a short drive from our Fox headquarters in Georgia. SCA operates under 3 industry-leading aftermarket brands, SCA Performance, Rocky Ridge Trucks and Rocky Mountain Truckworks. SCA currently has 3 manufacturing locations in Alabama, Georgia and Colorado. We believe this acquisition is complementary to our Tuscany business, expanding our North American footprint for manufacturing which can provide incremental efficiencies and capacity utilization as well as allow us to be in closer proximity to our customers. In addition, it will significantly expand our automotive dealer network from approximately 300 dealers nationally to nearly 2,000. This acquisition broadens and diversifies our product offering across instrumental trucks and SUV brands in a growing segment of the automotive industry. The combination of these benefits create a leading platform with significant runway for continued expansion. The acquisition also gives us the opportunity to include Fox' lift kits and suspension products on SCA's vehicles which meaningfully increases Fox' addressable market. The combination of Tuscany and SCA as part of Fox' branded portfolio of products provides us with a leading market position. SCA has an experienced and talented leadership team with a strong track record of growth and operating results. We believe they will complement our team extremely well, and we look forward to working with them. On a combined basis, we expect to drive financial synergies, which John will cover in a few minutes. This transaction is another example of our disciplined accretive M&A strategy to diversify revenue streams and drive growth. We believe Fox' expanded product portfolio will continue to resonate with our customers, demonstrate our commitment to innovation and growth across all Fox brands in both existing and new categories. Before I turn the call over to John, I'd like to touch on a recent announcement from Jeep. Last Thursday, at the Chicago Auto Show, Jeep unveiled its new truck, the Gladiator Mojave, which is designed to take on the extreme desert terrain at high speeds. This model features 6 Fox suspension components, the most Fox products ever on a production vehicle. The vehicle is designed with and incorporates 4 Fox 2.5 internal bypass shocks. It also includes 2 of our bump stops which feature an internal floating piston that increases damping performance and bottom-out control in the last few inches of travel. We are extremely pleased to have worked with SCA to include our performance-defining products on its latest vehicle in the Jeep product lineup. And with that, I'll turn the call over to John.

John Blocher

executive
#4

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. As Mike mentioned earlier, we have signed a definitive agreement to acquire SCA for $328 million, excluding vehicle inventory, with an additional $13 million of contingent performance-based retention incentives for key SCA management payable over the next 2 years. The transaction will be funded by an expanded and syndicated credit facility led by Bank of America together with cash on hand. The credit facility is expected to be completed upon closing of this transaction and will include term debt in addition to a revolving credit arrangement. The SCA transaction is expected to be accretive to Fox' fiscal 2020 results. Based on an expected closing date in late Q1, we anticipate SCA to contribute $83 million to $89 million of sales to our fiscal 2020 results. In addition, we expect SCA's contribution to our adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $22 million to $24 million for the remainder of fiscal 2020 as well as non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share in the range of $0.15 to $0.17, net of additional interest and integration expenses. Additionally, looking beyond fiscal 2020, we expect to generate accretive synergies from this transaction in excess of $3 million annually and for SCA's long-term growth rate to be relatively consistent with the company's Powered Vehicles Group long-term growth rate of low double digits. Now turning to our outlook for the fourth quarter of 2019. As we previously reported on October 30, 2019, we expected sales in the range of $175 million to $181 million and non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share in the range of $0.57 to $0.62. We now expect results to be slightly above this previously provided range. We'll be releasing our final 2019 fourth quarter and fiscal year results along with providing our first quarter and fiscal 2020 guidance on Tuesday, March 3, 2020. I'd like to now turn the call back over to Mike.

Michael Dennison

executive
#5

Thank you, John. We would like to open the call for questions. Operator?

Operator

operator
#6

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Larry Solow with CJS Securities.

Lawrence Solow

analyst
#7

I guess the first question is maybe -- can you just maybe give us a little comparison or what are some of the differences between this and Tuscany other than, obviously, it's a little bit bigger than when you bought Tuscany, margins are a little better. Just sort of what are the differences? And is it the same -- question 2, is it the same business model, where SCA actually gets the chassis from the dealer, uplifts it then gives it back to the dealer who sells it?

Michael Dennison

executive
#8

Yes, it's Mike. Good to talk to you and good questions. So it's very similar in the structure as Tuscany. It's the same way of go to market, if you will, as Tuscany's. So that stays the same. It does increase the brands that we actually go-to-market with, as you saw from the slide deck. In terms of how it fits in with Tuscany, think about it as basically a menu from kind of premium into maybe one step below premium, which was on the SCA offerings. It allows us to get to a broader demographic of people. So a little bit less adder to the vehicle price in some of the SCA and Rocky Ridge products. So it lets us grow into a broader market. As the slides say, we're expanding from basically several hundred dealers to a couple of thousand, give or take, in this deal. So we're going to get to a much broader audience, if you will, and that allows us to get to kind of a different demographic. The other piece I'd just add on the top of that is Rocky Mountain Trucks, which is -- in the SCA Holdings, is really around overlanding trucking. So it's a little bit of a different approach to the market. It's going to go to a different demographic completely than the rest of the business. So we like that. We think overlanding is a very fast-growing space. And we're excited to see what that can do.

Lawrence Solow

analyst
#9

Okay, great. And you mentioned that obviously gave you an opportunity to put some of Fox shocks and lift -- suspension and lift kits. Does SCA use some of your stuff today or no?

Michael Dennison

executive
#10

Yes. It's very -- Larry, it's very small. So this is a great opportunity for us. And this creates a huge addressable market that we can go expand into. And we're really excited to see what that can do in terms of the lift kits and suspension that we currently offer that's not in the SCA portfolio.

Operator

operator
#11

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Swartz with SunTrust.

Michael Swartz

analyst
#12

Just as a point of clarification there on the last question. The revenue that you gave us for the 9 months, 2020, that is net of any elimination from sales you made into them. I know it's small, but I just wanted to confirm that.

John Blocher

executive
#13

Correct. Yes. Yes, Mike. It's John here. Yes, it's net of that stuff. It's pretty small, and it's net.

Michael Swartz

analyst
#14

Okay. Cool. And then just from a -- maybe a 12-month financial basis, I'm just wondering, seasonality of this business, how do we look at that? I mean you're giving us the 9 months, what's the 12 months? And I think we're interested in understanding EBITDA just from a valuation perspective.

John Blocher

executive
#15

Yes. Yes, yes. So on a 12-month basis -- so their seasonality is somewhat similar to Fox' in the Power Vehicles Group, where it's the second and third quarters will tend to be a little bit higher, first and fourth quarters kind of -- are a little lower perhaps. And so I think you kind of take the 9-month projection and kind of relatively extrapolate it to a sales range, an EBITDA range and probably be in the ballpark for it.

Michael Swartz

analyst
#16

Okay. That's helpful. And then just 1 last question. Just in terms of the business, is it -- or how capital-intensive is it? And how much CapEx do they spend in that?

John Blocher

executive
#17

Yes. Mike, good question. So I think you're going to find it's pretty typical to our kind of a legacy Fox business, kind of that 3% to 4% of sales range. Right now, we're -- as we've been saying in the last year or so with the Georgia facility, we're actually kind of running up higher than that, as you know. But I think SCA is kind of more traditional along our long-term CapEx rate.

Operator

operator
#18

Our next question comes from the line of Scott Stember with CL King.

Scott Stember

analyst
#19

Where do you expect your leverage ratio to land once you complete the deal? And what is your plans for schedule of paying down debt after you complete the deal?

John Blocher

executive
#20

Yes. So look, we think -- we'd expect kind of upon closing -- and it's always a little bit of a to and fro here as you kind of go-forward, probably upwards in the -- upwards of 2.5x EBITDA at the close. And we feel between the cash flow from this transaction. And Fox, we'll kind of work that down over time.

Michael Dennison

executive
#21

And I would just add to that, Scott. We -- as we've said before, we're pretty conservative when it comes to leveraging, and we're going to remain that way. So I wouldn't anticipate a different leverage story from us on a long-term basis than what you've heard in the past.

Scott Stember

analyst
#22

All right. Just a follow-up question on it, compare and contrast with Tuscany. You said it's a step below. Are we talking a few thousand dollars or below or are we talking significantly below? Because I know the Tuscany product is a very, very high-end product. Just trying to narrow this down a little bit.

Michael Dennison

executive
#23

It's actually a pretty big range. There's a lot of different trucks in the portfolio. In fact, if you go to NADA Show, if you're aware of the NADA Show at the end of this week, you're going to see kind of that full portfolio of both Fox and SCA vehicles. You'll see that it's a pretty broad range. The really nice thing about this transaction, as you've heard us discuss is even though some of these vehicles sell for potentially -- for a lower price points, they still have a very nice margin profile. So we're really excited about that. That gets us to a broader demographic. It allows us to get our trucks in more people's garages than we're going to do with just a high-end, super expensive premium vehicle.

Operator

operator
#24

Our next question comes from the line of Alex Maroccia with Berenberg.

Alexander Maroccia

analyst
#25

So in terms of capacity from this new deal, how would you expect an uptick in intercompany sales to affect the existing capacity outlook? And then in terms of their current capacity situation, is it similar to what you guys had pre-Braselton facility or is it a little bit better.

Michael Dennison

executive
#26

Yes. So I'll take the second question first, and then John can jump in, too. But on the second question, they've got capacity, as I said in the prepared remarks in Georgia, in Alabama and in Colorado. That footprint helps us regionalize a little bit, so we can actually get trucks manufactured closer to end markets. So envision a scenario where any truck of -- whether it was a Rocky Ridge Truck or Rocky Mountain Truck or an SCA or Tuscany could be made in a certain manufacturing location, get it closer to the end market it's serving. That's one upside. In terms of capacity, those locations have quite a bit of capacity now. So we don't foresee any need for expanding that capacity in the near term or even in the midterm. We've got a lot of room to run with what we've got. And we go through limited facilities that we consider to be very well equipped. So that gets back to kind of the CapEx question.

John Blocher

executive
#27

Yes. Maybe on the intercompany side of it -- the capacity side of the current legacy shocks business. We feel we have current capacity, just you got to remember that these things take a little time to convert over and get integrated. So there's a little bit of time for that process to happen and then we have to remind everybody we've got Georgia coming up here in just a few more months. So we think we've got the capacity internally to support the transition.

Alexander Maroccia

analyst
#28

Got it. That makes sense. And then looking into the future now with other M&A opportunities, is there anything else in this space you would look to go after? Or are there any other on-road, specialty vehicle manufacturers that would be pretty lucrative?

Michael Dennison

executive
#29

There's a couple of ways to think of that. When we think about strategic acquisitions, we think about how they fit into our current business, how the management team fits into our culture and our management structure. This acquisition checks those boxes very handily. We also think about can we get to a #1 or #2 in the market with an acquisition or through organic growth strategy. In this particular case, it gets us to become the kind of what I would call a large or dominant player in the up-fitting market. So we feel really good about that. Do we think that there's other opportunities? Potentially. But we're really happy with what this brings to us. And so we're focused on integrating this one and making this one really produce as planned. So we're happy where we are. I'll put it that way.

Operator

operator
#30

Our next question comes from the line of Jim Duffy with Stifel.

Jim Duffy

analyst
#31

I want to start with a couple of real high-level questions. Do you guys view this as a higher-margin way to participate in growth of this market and working with the OEMs?

Michael Dennison

executive
#32

I do think this is an aftermarket business. And as we've said before, Jim, aftermarket tends to have a bit higher margin profile. This would follow that line of thinking completely and it allow -- yes. So I think it allows us through our synergies and other things to really go after a margin profile that we can protect and defend.

John Blocher

executive
#33

Yes. I think on the other side of it, I would say, is also -- we talked about in the past, this is trying to maintain that healthy balance between our aftermarket and our OEM business. So as OEMs may tend to grow or it seems like it's been growing in that type of thing, this helps us maintain that healthy balance that we'd like to have between our aftermarket and our OEM.

Michael Dennison

executive
#34

It's also -- yes, it's a good question. It's also a good way for us to produce new products and get new products on a vehicle that draws in OEM then back to us. As you know, we're going to lead in the aftermarket. So we can put some really performance-defining products in these vehicles, and it ends up becoming an attractive opportunity for an OEM to put on their factory vehicles. So it's a good way into some of the better standing opportunities.

Jim Duffy

analyst
#35

Makes a lot of sense. And then you have this helpful pie chart in the deck. You'll be above 50% share as the combined entity. What are you guys seeing as the growth rate of the market at this juncture?

Michael Dennison

executive
#36

Yes. A couple of things on that. When you think about that pie chart, with that pie chart toward our peer groups, so that's people that uses bailment type core or uses similar go-to-market strategies as us. You still have dealers that have what I call a private business or a mom and pop type shop around the dealer that supports the level of up-fitting, not through a bailment process, not directly with an OE. So those still exist, and that would add to that market size, if you will. We think it's hard for them to compete with us, of course, in terms of the way that we go to market. So I think that's important. And then to your -- the second half of your question in terms of growth, this is still, even today -- there's a couple of numbers, these are round numbers, so take it to that. But we're in a couple of thousand dealers out of like 10,000 dealers in the country. And that doesn't count Canada and Mexico or expanding beyond the borders of the U.S. So we're very small relative to the total dealer cap. And the second piece of it is, in terms of trucks, light trucks and SUVs out there, the up-fitted class of those vehicles is a really small percent, I think less than a couple of percent. So I don't want to suggest what the market share could be or the size could be, but you can talk from those numbers that there's some headwind that we have coming into it.

Jim Duffy

analyst
#37

Good enough. And then last one for me. Can you speak to the nature of the $3 million-plus synergies intended for future years?

John Blocher

executive
#38

Yes. I can talk to that one. So a lot of that is going to be primarily, as Mike mentioned, with some of the -- being closer to our customers, kind of diversifying our manufacturing. So you think about manufacturing, cost synergies, supply chain. We've got larger volumes that we can utilize on our supply chain and do some further optimization there. So that's primarily the focus of the near-term of the $3 million.

Operator

operator
#39

Our next question comes from the line of Craig Kennison with Baird.

Craig Kennison

analyst
#40

I'm sorry if I missed it, but what are the terms of the earn out?

John Blocher

executive
#41

I don't think -- well, we haven't put that into the...

Michael Dennison

executive
#42

The deck.

John Blocher

executive
#43

The deck. But it's primarily a couple of things. There's 2 components of it, like we said. There is a retention bonus that we're intentionally measured to stay through a period of 2 years, effectively. And then there are additional performance measures that are associated with that relative to the ability to meet certain performance measures internally. I'd say also, we did a very similar -- or somewhat similar deal back in the day with Race Face/Easton, this sort of acquisition. So it's not inconsistent with what we've done in the past. But it's really there to -- we feel -- one thing we like about this particular acquisition is we really like the management team. We're excited to have them join Fox. And we wanted to kind of have something -- have an incentive out there program to kind of retain them, motivate them, to continue to grow their business and grow with Fox.

Craig Kennison

analyst
#44

That's great. And then just wanted to follow up on this, the Georgia capacity question. Can you give us a feel for what your total capacity is in that facility? And then to what extent this transaction just increases that utilization rate?

Michael Dennison

executive
#45

Yes. As I said before -- this is Mike, Craig. So as I said before, Georgia basically doubled our existing manufacturing capacity. It also not only doubles it, it actually adds a whole bunch of efficiency to it because you're actually doing multiple functions with this thing going versus where we're at today, which is disparate manufacturing for machining and anodizing and assembling and all those kinds of things. So not only does it make it twice the size, it does it in such a way that you can get a lot more productivity on the same space which we think is great. In terms of where we're going to be at with capacity, we'll have plenty of expansion even after this acquisition in the current facilities we're developing here in Georgia. So this is not going to require us to rethink any other expansion plans or anything else we're doing. That was all contemplated, not necessarily this transaction, but the need for growth in that original plan. So we're in great shape for a number of years.

Craig Kennison

analyst
#46

And my last question, just regarding Tuscany. To what extent do your synergies require these 2 organizations, SCA and Tuscany, to kind of work together and -- or is that maybe something down the road where you could expect more synergy?

Michael Dennison

executive
#47

They'll be working together very closely. I believe that there's so much opportunity in how we go to market, how we leverage the strength and capability of the SCA management team, which I think is phenomenal, and how we utilize our Tuscany experience and knowledge to help grow both of these businesses. So you'll see them working very closely together, not only in how they go-to-market, so kind of the external forward-looking, but also in how they work with their OEMs when it comes to right now in Tuscany we work mainly with GM and Ford. This adds Chrysler to the mix, it adds Nissan to the mix. This creates an opportunity for us to work really efficiently and effectively with those OEMs to drive as much productivity and synergy as possible. So it's kind of both sides. And you'll see them working together day 1.

Operator

operator
#48

Our next question comes from the line of Randy Konik with Jefferies.

Randal Konik

analyst
#49

I want to go back to the 3 manufacturing facilities that you get with the SCA acquisition. You gave us some perspective that you're going to look to use, I guess, utilize production for Tuscany, et cetera. Can you give us some perspective on how much turnaround time for speed you can think to improve to get closer to the end markets? Just trying to get some perspective on time and see -- that you'd see for these facilities coming online. And then lastly, given these new facilities that come -- all these manufacturing facilities that come with the acquisition, are you thinking of other alternatives or added things to be put in there that you could kind of think about to kind of further expand the addressable markets, the speed and lower costing that you can kind of go through beyond just what we're thinking today.

Michael Dennison

executive
#50

Yes. To answer that first question, if I don't get the second question right, ask it again, I'll answer it again. On the first question, think about it 2 ways. It's not necessarily that the speed of which you can get a truck from one location to an end market, let's say, from our park in Tuscany to California because the speed of a truck going across that distance in the country is a few days max versus car owners, which is maybe a day. So you're not really gaining this. What you are gaining is responsiveness and the fact that as we have too much volume on one location, we can take some of that volume closer to the end market, move it to that location. So you get a better responsive model in that scenario. And you're also going to have reduction in logistics costs. When you think about what it takes to actually move trucks around the country between Alabama and California or Colorado and the East Coast, it's not ideal. So if you're going to actually produce trucks closer to that end market, you're going to get a benefit or you're going to pick up from a reduced logistics cost. And you're going to be able to respond instead of having kind of a supply chain gauge system in one location that can produce so many trucks in a day. What was your second question, again?

Randal Konik

analyst
#51

I'm just thinking about other ways -- as we move this -- part of the interesting aspect of the acquisition was to get you great strategic manufacturing facilities across the country. So I'm just thinking about how other ways you may think of using them for other parts of the business, for other areas of the kind of addressable market you're not attacking today to kind of go after in the future. Now that you have these kind of facilities that I think are really part of the -- one of the really good things about the acquisition.

Michael Dennison

executive
#52

Yes. I think there's a lot of opportunities as we look forward. One of the things we think about is in like an overlanding where it's an entirely new kind of business model for us in terms of the type of product that we're producing and the market we're going after. We're able to produce those in the West Coast, where overlanding is so popular, I think, is a big upside. I think as we think about the new vehicles that are coming out of the OEs over the next couple of years, there's a great opportunity for us to expand our lineup, not so much from a brand perspective or from a model perspective, I think that becomes a great opportunity. Clearly, as we develop shocks, look at other products for the aftermarket space, we can use those here. And in addition to, we think about buying wheels and tires and all things that go into producing these vehicles, be it plastic, ABS plastics for fenders and all those things. Again, another great upside for us. So we're still working through a lot of that stuff. It will take us a little while to do it. Let us get the business integrated first. But the footprint whether it's situated in proximity to -- for Alabama, and for the Georgia location, in proximity to the Georgia manufacturing location is phenomenal. So there's just so much there, hard to cover it all in 1 call. We really do believe on a long-term basis, we can get a lot out of this.

Operator

operator
#53

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Swartz with SunTrust.

Michael Swartz

analyst
#54

Just a quick follow up, clarification. On the $3 million in synergies, I just wanted to be clear that's cost only, that doesn't include you pulling through more of your suspension and some of your legacy products.

John Blocher

executive
#55

Well, especially it's going to be kind of -- it's an intercompany sale, so those will get eliminated going -- post -- going forward on this. So it's primarily manufacturing costs. And going forward, on a longer-term basis, like we've talked about, being able to expand the dealer base across with Tuscany, provides some additional revenue synergies and things of that nature. But right now, we're -- that kind of amount that we're talking about there is primarily with the supply chain and the manufacturing overhead cost.

Operator

operator
#56

Our final question comes from the line of Ryan Sundby with William Blair.

Ryan Sundby

analyst
#57

So Mike, it sounds like you expect growth going forward to kind of be similar to that long-term target for the powered vehicle segment. Just wondering if you could maybe look back and tell us or at least give us some framework of what growth has historically looked like for the business. And then second, you've touched on kind of the optimization of the logistics, production, sourcing, that kind of stuff. What about from, I guess a sales standpoint? As I look at the distribution -- or the dealer network, it seems like there's overlap here. Does this get you into more dealers or can you -- would a dealer sell both Tuscany and SCA? I'm just kind of curious on that sort of thing.

Michael Dennison

executive
#58

Yes. It's a good question. There's a couple of things there. So in terms of historical growth rates, so the SCA business has grown very well. One of the things we like about it is what we've shown and the stability of that business over a longer period of time. What they were able to do with it, it plays to a really nice growth rate. To your point, it equates to what we're doing right now in powered vehicles and have the opportunity to maybe even do better. In terms of how we think about the go-forward sales part of this thing, I think it starts with getting our sales strategy aligned and how we work the whole -- the entire dealer footprint on a collective basis synergistically. I don't know, to your specific question, I don't know if you necessarily put an SCA truck, a Tuscany truck, a Rocky Ridge truck all in the same dealer. But it allows us to think about regions and geographies a whole lot better than we currently do today. And maybe what that means is at the end of the day, we should be in 2,500 dealers or 3,000 dealers out of 10,000. It doesn't mean we're going to be in 10,000 dealers. That probably would be a mistake. I could tell you that in fact would be a mistake. But it definitely allows us to really get thoughtful and creative and strategic about that. And I think you'll see us really work on that right out of the gate.

Operator

operator
#59

We have reached the end of our question and answer session. And I would like to turn the call back over to Mr. Mike Dennison for any closing remarks.

Michael Dennison

executive
#60

Thank you for your questions and your interest in Fox. We're very excited about the SCA acquisition, and we look forward to speaking with you again when we report our 2019 fourth quarter and fiscal year results on March 3. Have a good evening.

Operator

operator
#61

This concludes today's teleconference. You may now disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Fox Factory Holding Corp. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Fox Factory Holding Corp. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.