Gates Industrial Corporation plc (GTES) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

May 10, 2023

New York Stock Exchange US Industrials Machinery conference_presentation 35 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Jerry Revich

analyst
#1

Really excited to have with us from Gates Corporation, Tom Pitstick, Chief Strategy Officer; Rich Kwas, Vice President of Investor Relations. Tom, Rich, thank you so much for joining us.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#2

Thanks, Jerry. Thanks for having us.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#3

Tom, as we sit here today, not that long since the IPO, can you talk about the competitive positioning of the business today compared to the time of the IPO? And how do you focus the evolution of the business over the next 3 to 5 years?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#4

Yes. Great question, Jerry. Thank you. We've really been focused on executing the strategy that we kicked off around the IPO, which was pivoting the business more towards industrial to capitalize on both the large market sizes that we see in industrial, but also the secular trends such as industrial automation that are supporting those markets. Yes, we've talked a lot about our pivot -- our selective participation in auto OEMs. So we've been executing that strategy very well. And really underpinning all of this is our focus on innovation. We've taken our Vitality Index from low single digits up to what we talked about last year at Investor Day in the low teens. We've launched almost 40 new platforms over the past couple of years. So from a competitive positioning standpoint, our focus on innovation is really supporting our ability to drive growth in the markets that we're participating in, which have, as we've talked about, very attractive secular trends behind them.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#5

And one of the elements of the Analyst Day plan was 24% EBITDA margin targets. How much does the inflationary environment that we've been on, how does that impact the target and timing compared to what we're planning for the Analyst Day?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#6

I might defer that one to Rich and kind of walk us through the targets.

Richard Kwas

executive
#7

So Jerry, as you know, at the end of last year, for the full year, we finished a little bit above 19%, so -- and off our normal 21%, 22% threshold there. So there's a couple of hundred basis points there that we expect to recover as the environment normalizes. We've incurred supply chain inefficiencies, also just combating inflation, which were at EBITDA margin neutrality now. So feel good about that, but it's still been a bit of a gross margin dilution impact. So over the next 12 to 18 months, we expect to get back to that threshold. Then the incremental 250 is going to come from a few different incremental initiatives. We got 80-20, which we expect to improve the profitability of our product suite and -- with our customer base. We've also got the incremental restructuring that we introduced late last year, and we'll be able to -- we expect to provide some more details later this year. And then the other thing that's been lost in the last year or 2 has been the productivity, the natural productivity that we get -- we should get year in, year out. And we would expect to get that starting really now, but going forward, and that should build momentum. And that will get us the incremental 250. And then there should be another 50 basis points associated with volume leverage. If you add that all up, that gets us there to that above 24% threshold.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#8

And when we look at the company's performance in prior cycles, margins have tapped out at 23% margins. Are we thinking of 24% as the new normal, so peak has to be 26%, 27%? Or how would you counsel us to think about that?

Richard Kwas

executive
#9

We feel good about getting to 24% on a normalized run rate. I think, depending on how the market environment is and the volume environment is and the overall economic -- global economic environment, there's potential to go past that. But really, we're targeting to get to 24% on a run rate basis in a reasonable environment.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#10

And so pretty big cycle-over-cycle performance then to get there. So Rich, we're talking about some normalization in terms of supply chain efficiency. The big gap, what I'm hearing from you, with 300, 400 basis point cycle over cycle is really 80-20 and the restructuring [ plans ].

Richard Kwas

executive
#11

Footprint optimization, right? And then don't underestimate, we -- some of the productivity that we would normally be experiencing, we haven't been able to fully capture at this point. So that's really going to build more momentum and compound.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#12

And that's really one of the critical elements of what's playing out in the numbers. You folks are putting up pretty good margin performance relative to the volumes. Talk to us about how much the supply chain is improving. Do you still have momentum as -- exiting 1Q into 2Q?

Richard Kwas

executive
#13

You want to take that one?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#14

Yes. So we've definitely seen improvement in the supply chain certainly from where we were in, say, third quarter of last year. I wouldn't say it's perfect yet, but we're on an improvement trend, maybe in contrast to parts of last year where we're not able to get the materials that we need or maybe they're not in the right place or exactly at the right time. So we're still incurring some costs to move things around. Maybe we get something in Asia we needed in Europe, we've got to move things around. But it's on an improvement trend, I would say, but we're not totally out of the woods yet.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#15

And Tom, if the trend continues, when will we be in a normal environment?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#16

Yes. I'd like to think that latter part of this year. As China starts to come fully back online, we start to see some stabilization in the sort of fill rates between regions in terms of raw materials, I think, as we get into the later part of the year.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#17

And so it sounds like potentially, if things go well, we've got a natural sequential margin uplift as that happens because all of this is pretty disruptive.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#18

Yes. It's part of the improvement plan that -- part of just the getting back to normal that Rich talked about. Certainly, supply chain stability is a piece of that.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#19

And in terms of looking at 1 quarter results, is it possible to get a rough sense of what's the extra expediting costs and efficiencies from not having the right things in the right places?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#20

We haven't really talked about that, but it's in that kind of 200 to 250.

Richard Kwas

executive
#21

In that 200 to 250 impact. So it's part of that.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#22

All of it, but it's part of that.

Richard Kwas

executive
#23

It's part of the 200 to 250. If you look where we are currently versus where we should be, it's part of that 200 to 250 difference in margin. So -- but we haven't quantified the specific expedited freight impact, but it's part of it.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#24

So Rich, just to make sure we're on the same page. So expedited freight plus the inefficiencies from not having on-time deliveries is about 200, 250 basis points? Or are there other items?

Richard Kwas

executive
#25

I would just keep it as -- just broadly, it's part of the 200 to 250, not -- it's just encompassing all of our operating inefficiencies along with the supply chain.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#26

Right. Okay. And when we look at the point of max pain, call it, second quarter of '22, third quarter '22, what was the drag relative to the 200 to 250?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#27

Did we publish that?

Richard Kwas

executive
#28

Yes. We didn't talk about it, but it was certainly -- that was an issue of not really being able to procure the right polymers. So we lost -- essentially, as you know, we've been building backlog, have been building backlog. We're still building a little bit of backlog here. So it's really the procurement of polymers. And so we didn't have the ability to get the polymers really at some point last -- in the third quarter last year. Now we're getting the polymers. To what Tom said, they may not exactly be efficient, being in the right place at the right time, but we're getting access to them, where in some cases last year in the third quarter, we weren't. So it was somewhat more -- there was definitely some cost inefficiency, but it was also on the top line impact, which we did recapture a bit in the fourth quarter because we grew 16% top line organically in the fourth quarter. So some of that did come back.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#29

And we're also seeing, I think, the benefits from some of the things we've talked about in the past of leveraging our material science capabilities to designing alternative materials, designing alternative suppliers, to provide more flexibility there. So we're seeing more and more of the benefits of those efforts as we sit here today.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#30

Tom, can you say more? So in terms of the mix of suppliers, that you're dual-sourced today versus a year or 2 ago?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#31

Yes. I don't know if I have a specific number that I can quote. But I can think of a number of instances of where we -- maybe we had 2 or 3 suppliers in the past, where we might have 5 suppliers now for something. And that takes work. That takes engineering work to qualify those new materials, make sure they perform the same as what we were sourcing from someone else. That's one piece. But the other piece of it is designing in alternative materials that are performing equal to or better than what we were using in the past, but maybe, for one reason or another, they weren't used in the past. Really leveraging those material science capabilities to take advantage of maybe more broadly available materials to give us more optionality from a supply chain standpoint.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#32

And can we talk about pricing? So we've had, across industrials, really good pricing action to pay for some of these good things, like on-time deliveries. As we think about 2024 price increase announcements for your customers, we're getting pretty close to that date. Are you signaling back to normal low single-digit type pricing for your customers in '24?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#33

Yes. I mean that's the right way to think about it. We have a stated objective of covering our costs and being margin neutral, which we've been achieving. We're still seeing inflation of raw materials, not as high or not as high of rates as we were seeing in the past 12 or 18 months, but we're still seeing positive inflation. So we intend to pass those through in terms of price and maintain margin neutrality. So as we think about entering '24, yes, we're certainly looking at what's happening to our materials. And as I said, we're still seeing inflation, albeit moderating inflation. And we've proven our ability to go get price in the market. Our brand, quality of our products, reputation we have in the market, we've been able to get fair price to cover our costs and maintain margin neutrality.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#34

And Tom, what we've seen from OEMs that have the type of market share that you folks have as supplier, but for -- as OEMs, they've been more aggressive in pushing pricing. And so just philosophically, what's kept you folks from saying, you know what, we're going to post a double-digit price increase like Caterpillar and Deere are posting?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#35

Well, we certainly have examples of where we've done that. I think over this past cycle, we've taken price in every one of our channels with virtually all of our customers, whether it's our OEM customers or our distribution channel partners. It's been a pretty concerted effort. We've gotten double-digit price increases in some cases based on what we were seeing in our cost increases. So yes, again, our stated objective is to cover costs and maintain margin neutrality.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#36

And in terms of -- just to shift gears on what you folks are seeing in industrial aftermarket. We've seen growth slow on a core basis as the comps have gotten tougher. Can you just talk about what you're seeing in real time and comment on dealer stocking levels, if you don't mind?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#37

Yes. I mean we've seen our channel inventory is pretty stable. We haven't seen any meaningful destocking. Yes, there is some choppiness in certain sub-end markets. We talked about logistics and distribution. You've seen how other companies in the space have talked about what's going on in some of those end markets that's showing some choppiness. Other areas, we've seen nice strength. But overall, we're seeing inventory levels kind of in line with demand in our channels. And we obviously looked at some of the macro indicators that have shown some softness in the industrial economy. But what's interesting is we continue to maintain a book-to-bill ratio above 1. We're seeing relatively stable inventory in the channel. So there's certainly some mixed signals with the macro indicators that are causing us to be pragmatic as we proceed through the year. But we've -- we're seeing support in the market still.

Richard Kwas

executive
#38

And we had some noise in industrial replacement in the first quarter with the cybersecurity incident, so that did primarily affect North America and did have some impact on industrial replacement activity for us. So it wasn't "clean" -- as clean a quarter as you would normally see with that impact.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#39

Got it. And in terms of why did it impact that particular region and channel, Rich, can you say more? Why wasn't it a bigger bump?

Richard Kwas

executive
#40

It's just basically because a lot of it's book-and-ship business, so it has to be available. It didn't really affect the OE side, it was more of the replacement side. And just given the size, where we're positioned, relative size, it just had more impact on North American industrial than some other areas of our business and Europe. It was more of our mature markets. And so -- but obviously, that's behind us now. So as we move forward, that -- we're not expecting those sales to come back because it's book-and-ship business, so it's not part of our guidance. So we maintain our guidance with the $15 million going away, but we should have a more normalized state here going forward.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#41

And given your market share, what happens when you can't fill that order? So for a lot of SKUs, I mean, you folks are essentially the only game in town.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#42

Yes. I mean, if a customer has got, I don't know, a vehicle down or a factory down, they're going to find a way to solve it. So if we -- in many cases, in the replacement channel, if we miss that order, we don't get it back. We'll get the next order when the next thing breaks or needs to be replaced. But some of that just -- the book-and-bill nature of our replacement business, I mean, sometimes you miss the order and you just miss it.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#43

Got it. And based on the cadence of book-and-ship activity that you folks have seen over the course of the quarter for industrial aftermarket, which regions stand out as seeing a healthy uptick?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#44

I mean, I think we're starting to see recovery in places like China. As China emerges from late last year, early this year, COVID, the February Chinese New Year this year, we're seeing improvements certainly in China. Exiting the quarter, we saw nice momentum out of China. Maybe a little stronger in the automotive replacement market, but we're seeing industrial start to pick up there as well. I think there are some of these macro trends, too, that we talk about, the reshoring trends, the mega projects that might be -- we think are providing some support to our industrial end markets, both on the OE side and the replacement side. I think we're probably in the early innings of the benefit from some of those. But yes, again, that's what we kind of referred to as choppiness. There are some segments like warehousing and logistics that might be a little down and other segments like industrial automation that might be a little bit stronger.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#45

And can we talk about industrial OE? So we're seeing channel inventory filling out of the OEMs. I'm wondering as you look at your book of business, where do you see you have the longest lead times? Which end markets and regions? And where do you see some choppiness?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#46

Yes. I mean, we see a lot of strength in construction and ag still. I mean we think, yes, there are some of our customer channel inventories are starting to improve, but we're seeing pretty steady order rates and consistent business there. I mean construction has been -- I think we posted mid-teens growth in the quarter. Ag, not quite that strong, but still positive. We're starting to see, again, China still down a bit, but we're seeing early signs of recovery there. Europe performed strong in those markets in the quarter. Am I missing anything there, Rich?

Richard Kwas

executive
#47

Europe has been pretty good for the last couple of quarters, and we're taking a pragmatic view there, but it's been so far, so good. So we've been pleasantly surprised.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#48

And can we talk about auto aftermarket in China? So after how much your activity has been artificially cut, how significant is this snapback, this normalization, 20% type growth? Just calibrate us because it can be interesting given the law of small numbers.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#49

Yes, I think we don't see it being a V-shaped snapback, quite like that, but we're seeing nice recovery. Vehicle miles traveled in China were down in the past couple of years due to COVID and the lockdowns. Our anticipation is those will get back to close to pre-pandemic levels this year, which supports us. You get the largest car parc in the world. It's aging more rapidly than other car parcs. So pretty strong fundamental dynamics in the market there. People are starting to bring their cars back into the shops after maybe not having them do it as much over the past couple of years. So I think there's good tailwinds behind the auto replacement market, in particular, in China. We're in a great position. We spent the past several years building out a broad channel, broad product portfolio coverage, really replicating our success in our more mature markets like Europe and North America, where it's really is all about having channel and all about having the right products for the market. And that's where we've been investing for the past 5 or 6 years, and we think that it positions us -- or actually, longer than 5 or 6 years, but positioned us well for that recovery that we see starting to happen.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#50

And Rich, you want to say something?

Richard Kwas

executive
#51

I was just going to say, in China aftermarket, the average age of the vehicle now is in that 6- to 7-year neighborhood, and you think about where our product suite really starts to see significant growth is in post 7 years. So we're starting to get to the early stages of that cycle where we should really get to the meat of that growth. And so that would seem to indicate that we're in a good position here in the succeeding years here to benefit from that trend.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#52

And Tom, you mentioned returning to pre-COVID levels. Is that 10% up year-over-year? 20%? Just can you calibrate us versus last year?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#53

It's -- I don't want to throw a number out, but it's -- it won't be the V-shaped bounce that we might have seen maybe in the early days of COVID in '21 in some markets. It's going to be a progressive, but nice growth. I'd hate to venture a number, but...

Jerry Revich

analyst
#54

Okay. And the strategy in China, can you expand on that? Because obviously, you've been able to grow that business, which is pretty hard to grow in a new market organically in that part of the world. So just talk about how you folks have been able to do that and how much more runway you have.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#55

Yes. I mean I think a lot of it is that, very early on, as we looked at the market for auto replacement there and we saw the trends in new vehicle purchases, we really got in and started building out channel coverage. So very broad channel coverage in every province, not just the Tier 1 cities, but we've -- our team has done a nice job of building out coverage. And then product coverage, if you don't have the right products to cover the vehicles in the market, you won't get off the starting line. It's something we've done historically very well in North America and Europe, and we just took the playbook and reapplied it in China. Some of the market dynamics, obviously, are different. It's maybe more -- 5, 10 years ago, it was more of a greenfield market. But we've done a nice job, I think, of establishing a strong brand. We believe we're the leader in our product categories in China. Yes, it's a competitive market. But having a broad portfolio of the right parts for the right applications, this makes our channel partners' lives easier. So they keep coming back.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#56

And in terms of -- from a pricing point standpoint, can you talk about where you folks stand versus the competition in that region? And essentially, in other parts of the world, you earn your margin through on-time deliveries and the product SKU. Is it the same playbook?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#57

Yes. I think -- I mean, I think it's -- I would say in most, if not all, markets in the auto replacement segment in particular, really in all of our segments, we're a premium brand. We're known for high quality, we're known for delivery, we're known for having a broad portfolio that makes our channel partners' lives easy. And the same is true in China. We have a strong brand that's recognized. Yes, I think that combination of brand products, product quality, innovation have helped us be the premium player in most of the markets we serve for many years.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#58

And getting excited about your market position here, Tom. Can we talk about auto OEM? So you folks have really focused on getting the right type of OEM business at the right margins. So can you just talk about is that a shift that's now largely complete? Or as additional platforms come up, is that something we should still keep in mind?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#59

Yes. We've -- going back to your initial question on how we've been executing the strategy and positioning the business since the IPO, I mean, we're really focused on this auto OEM strategy of selective participation. So we're pretty selective about the business we take. We want to -- we want programs where we bring something to the table in terms of differentiated technology or maybe some sort of system solution that gives us some advantage over the competition. We've taken that business from roughly, I'd say, mid-teens percent of total Gates sales to sub-10%, which has been our stated goal. And we intend to sort of manage the business in that sub-10% of total Gates sales range by being selective. We walk away from a lot of potential programs that we could win, but we're trying to manage that business appropriately.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#60

And so sub-10% today, is it going to go to sub-5%? Or is this...

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#61

No. Our target is to keep this sub-10%. Will it ever go away? I don't know. It won't go away. But I don't think it will go away. But we'll keep it where we can -- yes, if our selective participation strategy causes us to wean that down a little bit more, we're actually okay with that. That's part of the stated strategy.

Richard Kwas

executive
#62

And the other piece of that is just we'll have growth in other areas, right, that are just going to dilute it. So we'll be selective participants on programs and then put incremental capital in other areas that grow, and so that will dilute it as well.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#63

And we've more than made up for what we've said in auto OE with growth and auto replacement growth and initiatives like mobility, where we're leveraging a lot of that expertise and those product capabilities in new applications where there's a lot of secular market growth.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#64

And if we just assume the margin gap is 10 points between auto OE and the rest of the business, that shift of 5 points that you spoke about, Tom, that suggests margins are boosted by 50 basis points, something to that effect, from the transition?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#65

Yes. The mix away from auto OEs towards, say, mobility will naturally help that margin mix. Mobility is accretive to fleet average and auto OE is dilutive. So yes, natural.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#66

Good. Can we talk about electric vehicles? And so you folks obviously have the advantage of having the channel in aftermarket. Talk to us about how you can leverage that from an aftermarket standpoint and your views on your potential market position.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#67

Yes, a couple of things. I think one is the content opportunity per vehicle goes up pretty substantially for us as you move from an ICE application to an EV application. So we really like that content uplift. The mix tends to shift from maybe more historically power transmission products to what we would refer to as thermal management products in an EV application. So we're an incumbent in both those areas. So yes, within Gates, a little mix shift from PT to more thermal solutions, but a nice uplift in content. Same playbook, I mentioned, about China. How do we win in the aftermarket as EVs start to enter the aged part of the car parc? Well, we win through our channel partners and working with our channel partners and bringing a broad portfolio of products to the table. And we believe that we've been investing in building out our EV catalog coverage for several years now and believe -- again, our product categories are the leader in the independent aftermarket in terms of product coverage.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#68

And so Tom, can you expand on that point? Because there is no 1980 Toyota Camry in the EV world, right? So that big advantage that you folks have with the product SKUs might be smaller in an EV world. Can you just expand on how you can leverage your existing position?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#69

So I think the way you see aftermarket car parcs develop is we've seen rapid penetration at the new vehicle level of EVs, right, in really every part of the world. But the time it takes to age those EVs into that 7- to 12-year sweet spot window -- that 7 to 12 years, right, so it takes time to get into that age window. Sitting here today, the number of vehicles -- the number of EVs around the world in that window of 7 to 12 years is relatively low. So we're building our product catalog out ahead of that wave that's coming in the 3- to 5-year time frame, give or take, where we start to see a significant population of vehicles in that aged window. We'll be more than ready for it when that hits. But it takes time for the car parc to age, right, in that mix.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#70

And you have agreements, I believe, with O'Reilly and NAPA and the major distributors. Are you finding that you're getting the call to provide these new components?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#71

Yes. What I'm hearing and seeing from my teams that are out in the field pitching our capabilities in the space is we believe we're leading with messaging around parts availability, coverage, training materials to support both our channel partners, but also their end customers, the installers and shops, in terms of being ready for this aged car window to start to open up in a few years as these vehicles enter that age sweet spot. So we get good kudos from our channel partners on the work we're doing and being out ahead. And again, it's just -- it's executing that playbook that has made us a strong player in the aftermarket for a long time, channel access and product coverage.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#72

And low initial volumes, presumably, that's a benefit to you compared to other players that are not current suppliers, right?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#73

I mean I just want to -- one of the strengths, naturally, if you have broad coverage of a car parc is you have a lot of SKUs to cover that. So we are, I think, quite proficient at managing an appropriate level of complexity to serve the market. And I think that's an important point. Tying back to the 80-20 concept, we don't just cover everything for the sake of covering everything. We're thoughtful about building out catalog coverage for parts of the car parc, where we've got the near-term market opportunity.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#74

Got it. And in terms of any OE opportunities in the EV environment. I know we spoke about the business in its entirety not being a huge focus, but what about EV specifically?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#75

Yes. I mean we're taking the same strategy of selective participation. So there are opportunities we're walking away from, and there's opportunities that we're chasing hard. We've got content on -- I won't name names, but many platforms that you might see on the road every day. We're also quite excited about the heavy-duty opportunity in that space. We talk about the content uplift from an IC engine to an EV platform in the auto space. But if you think about that in a heavy-duty truck, where you've got a much more distributed architecture, it's just a much physically bigger vehicle, there's a lot more product content on those for us. And we've -- some of our technical capabilities with our new water pump and our thermal management hose capability are nicely suited for heavy duty. So we see a good opportunity there as well.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#76

And when you say heavy duty, is that automotive or truck?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#77

Truck, bus, commercial vehicles. Last-mile delivery is an interesting space, right, where I think EVs have a nice advantage with a lot of start-stop, right? So we see some good opportunities and some good programs in those applications as well.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#78

And can you say more? So the component that you would sell into those applications, what's the ASPs?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#79

We've got maybe a representative program that's 4 or 5x more content than, say, a typical automotive platform. Just it's a multiple. It's not an order magnitude, but it's a multiple of what you might see in auto, just due to the sheer size of the vehicle and the distributed architecture of these thermal management systems.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#80

Very interesting. And can we shift gears a little bit to talk about the company's distribution. So 370,000 SKUs, most of them delivered within 24, 48 hours. Any interesting technological developments that you folks are implementing behind the scenes that could be a tailwind for the business?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#81

Yes. I mean in terms of getting product to customer, we're pretty comfortable with our distribution footprint. In terms of technical capabilities, there's always ways to run your DCs better and improvements in software solutions and business operating processes. Yes, I think we're doing some interesting things, I think, with digital tools and tying digital tools to demand creation. So on the PT side, we recently launched the mobile version of our Gates-designed power tools, which you can design a belt drive in the field on your iPhone. We've had desktop versions, and we've upgraded those desktop versions. But those tools make it very easy for our customers to design in a drive, determine benefits such as energy efficiency improvements, et cetera. Those lead to demand generation, which we ultimately will fulfill through our distribution networks and our distribution partners. On the FP side, as I think we've shown publicly or I know we've shown publicly our GC20 crimper platform, which is a digital platform that enables assemblers and distributors to assemble hydraulic hose assemblies. Well, when they're doing that digitally, we're able to support them in the process of making the assembly, but also monitor consumption and potentially use that to maybe do auto replenishment schemes. And just to make sure our customers in the field have the latest information about our products, the latest training and access to products in real time as they consume that product in the field. Maybe less about the distribution centers themselves, but more about how are we using digital tools to create demand downstream from our DCs. Those are some of the examples.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#82

And any potential for a push marketing sort of thing? So...

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#83

Yes. So what we've seen in our crimper platform when we launch a new product, we can push information about that new product to the screen right in front of the operator. So you can imagine, hey, you're currently using this product, here's a new product from Gates and here's the 3 benefits of this product. Have that show up right at the point of use, which is pretty powerful from a marketing standpoint. And there's training materials and best practices, troubleshooting, things we can do with the digital platform that you couldn't do with the legacy analog platform.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#84

So we spoke about electrification. Any other industry trends that you're monitoring that could be interesting for your folks?

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#85

Yes. I mean we've talked about this one quite a bit, but we really like the electrification trends in the 2-wheeler personal mobility sector. I mean, okay, is it a corollary to the electrification in automobiles? Maybe. But we think it's happening much faster in 2-wheelers. It's hard for me to imagine a 2-wheeler without a belt drive -- an electric 2-wheeler without a belt drive solution. I'm sure there are examples you could find that don't have a belt drive solution. But if you're driving a nice, quiet e-2-wheeler, you don't want to hear the chain slapping around and making a bunch of noise and having to be oiled and retension-ed. The belt drive solution is just a really elegant solution for an electric 2-wheel vehicle. So that's a nice supportive trend. And I think industrial automation, in general, benefits our products. Infrastructure build-out. If you're building a road, you're using a machine that's using hydraulics most likely. The mega project investments that are ongoing could support our construction applications. So there's a number of strong secular tailwinds behind what we're doing. We just got to make sure we're there with the right products and the right channel partners at the right time to serve them.

Jerry Revich

analyst
#86

Super. Yes. Well, that's all the time that we have. Please join me in thanking Tom and Rich for coming out. Gentlemen, thank you.

Thomas Pitstick

executive
#87

Thank you. Thanks, Jerry.

Richard Kwas

executive
#88

Thanks, Jerry. Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Gates Industrial Corporation plc transcript — plus 248,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Gates Industrial Corporation plc earnings transcripts and 248,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.