GCC, S.A.B. de C.V. (GCC) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
July 29, 2026
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorGood morning, and welcome to GCC's Second Quarter 2026 Earnings Results Conference Call. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that this call is being recorded -- please also note that a slide presentation accompanies today's webcast. The link is available on the company's IR website at gcc.com. I would now like to turn the call over to Sahory Ogushi, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Sahory Ogushi
executiveGood morning, everyone, and thank you for joining. With me today are Enrique Escalante, our Chief Executive Officer; and Maik Strecker, Chief Financial Officer. The earnings release detailing this quarter's results was released yesterday after market closed and is available on GCC's IR website. This conference call is also being broadcast live within the Investors section at gcc.com. Both the webcast replay of the call and transcript will be available on the same site approximately 1 hour after the end of today's call. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that our remarks today will include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause these results to differ materially are set forth in yesterday's press release and in our quarterly report filed with the Mexican Stock Exchange. Any forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions as of today, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events. With that, let me now turn the call over to Enrique.
Hector Enrique Escalante Ochoa
executiveThank you, Sahory, and good morning, everyone. The second quarter built on the progress we saw earlier in the year. We delivered strong top and bottom line growth, driven by higher cement and concrete volumes in the United States and by continued improvement in Mexico. The quarter also showed how the business responds as activity shifts across segments and geographies. We repositioned volumes towards the strongest areas of demand while continuing to serve customers reliably. That ability depends on the capabilities and experience of our team, which brings me to our people strategy. Starting up the kiln at Odessa was the clearest example this quarter of what our teams can deliver. Commissioning a project of this scale requires deep technical preparation and close coordination across plants. The training and cross plan work have enabled the team to reach this milestone successfully. Building those capabilities is a continuous effort. Year-to-date, we have delivered more than 8,400 hours of training across the network, focused on the technical skills that support safe and consistent operations. In parallel, we advanced the GCC program through which former employees return to work alongside current teams and transfer decades of operational knowledge, deepening expertise across the company and preserving institutional knowledge as we grow. Under our strategy, we continue to prioritize initiatives that improve both environmental performance and operating economics. During the first half, blended cement accounted for 79% of total production, while natural gas and alternative fuels continue to gain share in our energy mix. Our flexible fuel strategy gives our plants the ability to shift between fuels as relative economics change. During the quarter, this helped keep fuel costs within our expectations despite market volatility. We also continued investing in natural gas pipeline infrastructure, broadening across to lower-cost fuel, strengthening supply reliability and improving our long-term cost position. Together, these initiatives demonstrate how sustainability and economics can advance in the same direction at GCC. Turning now to our growth strategy. In the United States, the trends we discussed earlier in the year continued into the second quarter with strong volume growth across both cement and concrete. Cement volumes increased 10.8%, supported by broad project activity and by the contribution from our terminals in Texas and Arizona, which were not present in the prior year period. Concrete volumes increased nearly 29%, reflecting the performance of our existing operations and the contribution from the ready-mix business acquired in the first quarter. Excluding those acquired operations, concrete volumes still grew 15% during the quarter. More broadly, customers continue to report healthy backlogs across the U.S. end market, supporting our outlook for the remainder of the construction season. Against that backdrop, let me review the main demand drivers, starting with infrastructure. Infrastructure remains one of the main sources of demand. We are actively participating in bidding work across our footprint and in interstate highway projects in Texas, sustaining solid demand for both cement and concrete. Looking beyond the current construction season, the policy environment also remains constructive. Discussions around the next U.S. surface transportation authorization continue to emphasize core transportation priorities, including roads and bridges. Compared with the broader scope of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, this direction is more closely aligned with the type of projects that drive cement consumption. Several states in our footprint have historically favored concrete paving, and this creates a positive setup for GCC. In addition, the bill includes proposed reforms to simplify and accelerate the permitting process for infrastructure projects. Based on normal program timing, we would expect any related volume benefit to begin emerging around mid-2027. Renewable energy also remains an important contributor. We completed a wind farm project during the quarter and expect to begin three additional projects in Texas and North Dakota in the third quarter, which should continue supporting activity across the network. Data center-related activity is also becoming more tangible. Projects that have been on hold during permitting are moving again, and we are actively supplying work while bidding additional opportunities. A good example is the Meta data center in El Paso, which Meta now describes as an investment of more than $10 billion. Projects of this scale can generate significant demand for concrete and cement throughout their construction cycle. In parallel, we are involved in power generation work linked to data center development, broadening the opportunity set across our footprint. In oil and gas, activity improved in mid-May and June. Customers' confidence improved as oil prices moved into more constructive range and oil well cement became an additional source of support for our U.S. volumes. At current levels, we are able to sell everything we can produce in oil well cement. The timing of the Odessa ramp-up is well aligned with this shift and shipments from the new line will expand our ability to serve this segment. This is a constructive development, and we are positioned to participate as the activity continues to develop. Residential activity continues to be constrained by persistently high mortgage rates. With affordability still under pressure, we do not expect to see a meaningful change in this segment during the remainder of 2026. From a commercial standpoint, U.S. pricing remained challenging. Average cement prices were down in the quarter and year-to-date, reflecting the product and geographic mix we have discussed since the beginning of the year. The competitive environment has also broadened as imported cement begins reaching inland markets that historically have been less exposed. However, our geographic position away from the coastal areas continues to give us a structural advantage relative to markets with heavier import penetration. We are engaging through industry channels to support fair and rational market conditions, and we remain disciplined in our commercial approach, prioritizing service, reliability and long-term customer relationships. Overall, the U.S. quarter reflects strong volume performance across several end markets, healthy customer backlogs and a supportive setup for the third quarter construction season. Turning to Mexico. The second quarter provided further evidence of recovery. Cement volumes grew 6.2%, led by self-construction, residential demand and infrastructure activity. Concrete volumes were essentially flat with a slight decline reflecting the completion of certain residential and industrial projects that have supported the prior year comparison. Housing remains a constructive part of the market. Private activity stayed healthy, while the federal housing initiative continued to move to its planning phase. Over time, the program has the potential to materially expand housing activity in the state, including the possibility of doubling the number of homes built annually. and we are positioning the network to support that growth. Infrastructure also continues to provide important momentum. We are participating in the highest level of activity we have seen in the last decade and additional projects are expected to materialize through the second half of the year. In the Industrial segment, activity remained cautious and broadly consistent with 2025 as customers continue to take a measured approach to investment decisions. Although confidence has not yet returned meaningfully, our long-term view of the region remains intact. GCT has operated successfully through multiple cycles of trade and policy uncertainty, and we are prepared to respond as conditions improve. From a pricing standpoint, Mexico remained broadly stable. Cement and concrete prices were essentially flat, reflecting a higher share of infrastructure work in the mix, some timing effect in price implementation. The underlying pricing environment remains sound. Overall, the quarter provides tangible evidence of Mexico's recovery with housing and infrastructure supporting a constructive setup for the second half of the year. Turning now to capital allocation. In the second quarter also advanced investments in our network. Odessa remained the most important operational milestone of the year. We successfully started up the new kiln in June, moving the production line into ramp-up. The final scope of the project is also stronger than originally announced. During construction, we obtained an expansion of the plant's permitted capacity and secured a kiln with 17% higher capacity. The project will add 1.1 million metric tons of incremental capacity, bringing total plant capacity to 1.6 million metric tons. Total investment is now expected to $700 million, equivalent to $636 per metric ton of incremental capacity and approximately $50 million below the original budget. This result reflects continued work throughout the project to improve engineering, procurement and project execution, allowing us to increase capacity while lowering total requirements of capital to $700 million. Our focus now is on stabilizing equipment and production, integrating the new capacity into the network in a controlled manner. In parallel, we're advancing the approval process with State Department of Transportation for our cement mill design. Based on current progress, we expect to begin shipping cement from the new production line slowly and consistently in the latter part of the third quarter. Building the network around Odessa is the natural next step, and the second quarter brought clear progress on that front. We completed a new cement terminal in Abilene, Texas, extending our logistics reach across West Texas. The terminal complements the aggregates platform we began scaling more deliberately with the acquisitions announced in early 2025 and improves our position in a market becoming increasingly relevant for data center development and the infrastructure that supports it. The second quarter also marked another step in building our aggregates platform. Following the expansion of our position in El Paso region in the first quarter, we added aggregates and concrete operations in Amarillo and the Midland Odessa region. These transactions broaden our presence in attractive markets, deepen our aggregates position and help maximize the value of the Odessa expansion. Year-to-date, we have invested approximately $91 million in acquisitions, adding approximately $11 million in EBITDA contribution. Including the transactions completed since 2024, our cumulative investment in this segment totals approximately $225 million, representing about $25 million of additional EBITDA. Together, these acquisitions build a scale in aggregates and reinforce our ability to serve customers across this market with construction material solutions. In summary, the quarter advanced each of the priorities we set at the start of the year, stronger market activity, the controlled ramp-up of Odessa and expansion of our aggregates platform in the region. We remain focused on our customer service, stabilizing the new line and building the network for future growth. With that, let me turn the call over to Maik for a review of our financial results.
Maik Strecker
executiveThank you, Enrique, and good morning to everyone. Starting with consolidated performance. Second quarter sales totaled $418.4 million, an increase of 15% compared with the same period last year. Growth reflected higher volumes and stronger concrete pricing in both countries and the appreciation of the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar. In the United States, revenues increased 14.1%. Cement volumes increased 10.8%, while concrete volumes were up 28.7%, reflecting the performance of our ready-mix operations and the contribution from the acquired business in El Paso, Texas. Concrete pricing increased 5.7%, while cement pricing declined 3.2%, consistent with the product project and geographic mix dynamics discussed earlier. Overall, the quarter reflects strong activity, the contribution from our new terminals and continued execution across multiple end-use segments. In Mexico, revenues increased 17.7%, supported by volume growth in cement and higher pricing in concrete. Results reflect the improving activity across the self-construction, housing and infrastructure segment that Enrique described. From a cost perspective, cost of sales as a percentage of sales increased by 50 basis points, reflecting higher production costs, the inclusion of the operations acquired in the first quarter and higher transfer freight. The freight increase reflects additional cement shipments from our plants in both the United States and Mexico to support demand in the Odessa market during the ramp-up as well as shipments serving our newer terminals. These logistics costs support uninterrupted customer service during the ramp-up phase of the Odessa project. We expect this effect to ease as Odessa production stabilizes and distribution flows are optimized. SG&A expenses increased to $34.5 million driven primarily by the appreciation of the Mexican peso and by expenses related to the acquired operations as well as the annual salary adjustments across the business. As a result, EBITDA for the quarter totaled $132.9 million, an increase of 12.3% compared to the prior year period with an EBITDA margin of 31.8%. As anticipated, margins reflect the temporary logistics and mix effects discussed earlier. We expect these effects to ease as the Odessa ramp up and the network moves towards a more efficient operating configuration. Free cash flow for the quarter totaled $56.9 million, a 17% increase. Higher EBITDA generation, lower cash taxes and lower working capital requirements drove the improvement. In terms of capital allocation, capital expenditures totaled $34.5 million during the quarter related mainly to the Odessa expansion. We also returned $43.1 million to shareholders through dividends and share buybacks. We ended the quarter with cash and equivalents of $812.5 million and a net debt to EBITDA of negative 0.37x. This balance sheet position preserves our ability to fund growth investments while maintaining flexibility. In summary, the financial results show that volume growth and the acquired businesses are expanding the earnings base, while the temporary cost of the Odessa ramp-up remains contained within our original plans. With that, I will turn the call back to Enrique.
Hector Enrique Escalante Ochoa
executiveThank you, Maik. Before we open the call to questions, let me update how we are thinking about the balance of the year. First half performance provides greater visibility into how 2026 is developing, and the picture has strengthened since January. As a result, we are updating selected elements of our full year outlook as follows. In Mexico, first half cement volumes came in ahead of our initial plan, and we are now expecting full year volumes to grow at a mid-single-digit rate, up from the low single-digit increase we guided to in January. In the United States, including the newly acquired operations, we now expect full year concrete volumes to increase at a low single-digit rate for the full year, a meaningful improvement from the high single-digit decline we had originally planned for. In U.S. cement, pricing continues to reflect the mix dynamics we have discussed throughout the year, alongside a broader competitive environment across parts of our footprint. For the full year, we now expect U.S. cement pricing to decrease low single digits. Every other assumption we shared in January across both countries remains in place. While several of these elements have improved, we are maintaining our full year EBITDA guidance of mid-single-digit growth as the transitional costs associated with the Odessa ramp-up will be more concentrated in the third quarter. Our priorities for the second half are clear: ramp up Odessa and begin customer shipments, maintain service through the network transition and integrate the acquisitions completed during the first half. The setup of the following years continues to build, and we remain confident in the strategy and direction of the business. With that, we will open the call for questions. Operator, please proceed.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Alejandra Obregon from Morgan Stanley Investment Management.
Alejandra Obregon
analystThis is -- congratulations on the Odessa milestone. And actually, my question is on the volumes in the U.S. and your guidance there. I was hoping to better understand how much of your expected volume growth in the U.S. is attributable to volumes from Odessa? And how -- and where do you expect that to land in terms of utilization by year-end? So if you can also elaborate on how construction cement volumes are performing across the rest of your footprint and whether Odessa today is replacing some of those volumes?
Hector Enrique Escalante Ochoa
executiveWe don't necessarily disclose exactly, I mean, what -- how much of the shipments are going to be coming from each plant, but we've been saying that this is an optimization effort. And so we're shifting the network and broadly speaking, bringing cement from Samalayuca back to the plant and starting up the kiln as we said. We have also discussed that we're going to do a slow and consistent ramp-up of the plant throughout the third quarter and fourth quarter. We don't expect to be in full utilization of the plant on an annualized basis until next year 2027.
Maik Strecker
executiveAnd I would probably add, again, in the context of Odessa, as we've seen some positive momentum on the oil segment. Again, the start-up of Odessa comes at the right moment, so we can take advantage of that. So that's another positive for Odessa specifically. And then you asked about the kind of the construction cement. Here again, we announced we have a small terminal now in Abilene that connects well with the aggregates platform that we have. We didn't have that in previous years. And here, that part is very much driven by data centers and all the infrastructure around it. So it comes at a good time to support the Odessa ramp-up. So we're actually very positive what we're seeing in that West Texas market at this moment in time.
Alejandra Obregon
analystExcellent. And if I may follow up, just to better understand, is your guidance changing your expectations for oil well cement or not yet?
Maik Strecker
executiveNot yet, not yet. That's why we left the cement guidance pretty much the same. And again, we had a slower start, so we compensate a little bit as we're working through the year, but no change on the guidance there.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Adrian Huerta from JPMorgan.
Adrian Huerta
analystMy question has to do with the -- your aggregates strategy. Good acquisitions in Texas. What else can we expect over the next 12, 18 months in -- which other markets would you like to have operations? And if you can also elaborate a bit on the ready-mix one as well. You added some new operations. And is this a plan also to continue growing the ready-mix footprint?
Hector Enrique Escalante Ochoa
executiveYes, on aggregates, I mean, first, Adrian, yes, we definitely plan to continue consistently making acquisitions in aggregates. We're still pretty much, I mean, focused on what we said before. to do it in our region, trying to connect with the network as much as we can. So in concrete, we're going to continue looking for opportunities in Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, and that's what we are most inclined of, but we are not limited to those markets only. And we are also thinking that as we continue, we're going to probably try to increase the size of acquisitions that we've been making in the aggregate side. So that's a consistent strategy, and we said we'll start working and then we job and then we run. So that's the direction we're following. In ready-mix, yes, we have said in the past that we will invest in ready-mix only if it's an integrated play, either with the aggregates or with our cement plant. But we're definitely open to continue growing in ready-mix and we have been doing it so far under that -- under those considerations.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Pablo Ricalde from BofA .
Pablo Ricalde
analystThis is a follow-up to Alejandro's questions on the Odessa milestone. I don't know if there are some like pre operating expenses registered on the second quarter this year? Or do you expect -- do you expect something to register on the third quarter or nothing additional should be registered on the integration of Odessa?
Maik Strecker
executiveThanks for the question. I will take the first part here and talk about the ramp-up and the operating expenses. The main topic there for us is around logistics to bring VESA up and integrate the new volume into the network. The network that we have built over the last year, 1.5 years, we have supported that with cement out of our other plants. So as that ramp-up happens, that logistics cost still kind of remains specifically in this current quarter. That's probably one of the key kind of operating expenses or introduction expenses that we're carefully watching. And as we said in our remarks, we should see that normalize as we go towards the end of the year and then into 2027.
Operator
operatorThe next question is from Daniel Rojas from Bank of America.
Daniel Rojas
analystI was interested in understanding more on your input costs and what you're seeing into the second half. What are the areas of opportunity in terms of natural gas and other input costs that you might be seeing increasing due to the pressure we're seeing in overall energy prices?
Maik Strecker
executiveYes, Daniel, this is Maik again. Thanks for the question. Overall, input costs, specifically around fuel, we actually see relatively stable. Again, we're benefiting from the investments in that flexible fuel strategy. We're taking advantage of the current very economic gas opportunities. So we're using a lot of natural gas across the network. So that's one. In parallel, we're still taking advantage of alternative fuels where a, makes good economical sense and gives us a benefit from a cost perspective and of course, part of our midterm sustainability road map. So from that aspect, fuel very stable. Very similar on the power side, at least in the Mexico situation, Mexico plant. In the U.S. plants, we see in some areas a little bit of power increases. Some of that is driven by all the power needs with data centers, and we all hear it in the news. So we see a little bit of power pressure from a cost perspective. But kind of overall in the context of how we run the business, we still see that manageable throughout the year.
Daniel Rojas
analystAnd I have a follow-up. Regarding your M&A strategy and the acquisitions you've been doing in the aggregate and ready-mix space, you've already said that it has to be complementary to your network. But looking at the map, it has been concentrated in Midland, West Texas all the way to El Paso. My question is, have the opportunities being paid out in that region and that may force you to look into other parts of the U.S.? Or are we seeing valuations in that particular region going up to a point that it's not as interesting for you? I just wanted a little bit of more color on what you already expanded on.
Hector Enrique Escalante Ochoa
executiveDaniel, this is Enrique. Just expanding on elaborating on the answer I gave before. We're not constrained only to Texas for the growth of aggregates and ready-mix. We had a deliberate focus there because of Odessa, and we wanted to make sure that we acquire some assets in aggregates and ready-mix that will strengthen our position there. So we already did that. And with that, I can tell you that we are looking more broadly to different states where we have operations to continue with this growth. And as I said, probably in a higher amount of investment.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Emilio Fuentes from GBM.
Unknown Analyst
analystI have 2 questions. The first one is regarding any expectations on weather conditions during the second half of the year, especially regarding the expected impact from El Nino that you have seen or you expect? And the second one is regarding the $11 million contribution you shared from the acquisitions from 2026 and $25 million in 2024. Does this already include synergies? And if not, how bigger can the contribution get.
Maik Strecker
executiveThis is Maik. We had a little bit of difficulty hearing your first question. I will answer the second one. And then if you don't mind, maybe repeat the first one. The second one, I understood that you were asking about the Aggregates acquisition and the acquired EBITDA year-to-date and over the last, call it, 2 years. That acquired EBITDA is before synergies. So that's kind of how we acquired those businesses. We are, of course, now working on detailed plans to lift synergies for these businesses. And again, connecting it back to what Enrique said, these businesses are located in markets where we have already assets, either cement assets or other aggregates assets or ready-mix assets. So there will be a good level of synergies that we're planning to lift, starting with operational synergies that we think we can deploy. Keep in mind, these are smaller businesses, so best practice sharing, utilizing certain equipment across the network will help us. And then, of course, the commercial opportunities. Also, as mentioned, best example is probably Abilene, where we invested in aggregates almost 18 months ago. Now with cement in that market, we have more differentiated offerings to these data centers that require aggregates, require cement for soil stabilization, of course, require cement for concrete and so on. So those are the commercial opportunities that we're working on to lift and to integrate those businesses. So that's kind of the context on the M&A on these businesses. And if you don't mind, if you can repeat maybe the first question, we had a hard time to hear that.
Unknown Analyst
analystYes. The first question was regarding any potential weather impacts on the second half of the year that you have started, especially regarding the El Nino effect and how this could affect volumes in the regions.
Hector Enrique Escalante Ochoa
executiveEmilio, this is Enrique. We're not concerned with that, that we're factoring the typical weather patterns in the different markets where we are in our guidance. Obviously, if there's anything extreme, I mean, unforeseen, of course, it will have an effect. But otherwise, I continue with that guidance, including those, I mean, normal weather patterns.
Operator
operatorThank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the floor back to Ms. Ogushi.
Sahory Ogushi
executiveThank you again for your time and continued interest in GCC. We look forward to speaking with you again soon.
Operator
operatorThis concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete GCC, S.A.B. de C.V. transcript — plus 252,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →This call discussed
For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to GCC, S.A.B. de C.V. earnings transcripts and 252,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.