Gen Digital Inc. (GEN) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

November 30, 2020

NASDAQ US Information Technology Software conference_presentation 30 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#1

So, well, with that, everybody, good afternoon. Good evening. I'm, once again, Brad Zelnick, Credit Suisse software analyst. And for this session, we are extremely delighted to be joined by the team from NortonLifeLock. With us today, we have CEO, Vincent Pilette; CFO, Natalie Derse; and IR extraordinaire, Mary Li. Do I see you, Mary?

Mary Lai

executive
#2

Yes. I'm here.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#3

That is you. All right. You're all in a conference room. I'm a little closer to a camera. But the good news is we're all here. And just for housekeeping, the format of this presentation is actually a fireside chat. I have a bunch of questions I would like to ask our guests. And I will also keep my eyes on my e-mail. So if you all have a question for the team, let me know and I will try to work it into the conversation as I set that all up here. So maybe if we could, first off, thank you all for joining.

Vincent Pilette

executive
#4

Yes, absolutely. Thanks for having us, and we're also extremely delighted to talk to you today.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#5

Awesome. Well, it's always good to see you, Vincent, but even better to see you at the Crédit Suisse 24th Annual Tech Conference. Although if I had my choice, it would have been in Arizona this year. But I think everybody understands, given the circumstances.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#6

Maybe just to -- as an introduction, we've been hearing quite a bit about increased malicious activity online as the pandemic has raged globally. How do you think about consumer cybersafety? How has it been impacted during these times? And what are the ways NortonLifeLock can help address these concerns for customers?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#7

Yes. So our sales of the Enterprise business and our focus on consumer-only back 12 months ago has been at the perfect time to handle then this pandemic. Our vision and our mission is really to provide everyone with safety when he or she conducts his or her digital life. And more and more activities would move from the physical world into the virtual world. That was our hypothesis. We're going or embarked on the journey to build a portfolio, comprehensive portfolio, an integrated portfolio to deliver cybersafety to everyone. And the pandemic has raised the level of awareness towards this need for cybersafety. Obviously, it moved a lot of the activities online, whether it's the kids, the students studying online, and we've seen a lot of attacks on schools and ransomware for student grades and other confidential information. A lot of people are now moving their health monitored online, a lot of the activities, even the seniors now moving online. My mother is 80, has now opened an account with Amazon. And so, all of that has created more risk and awareness to be protected against that cyber criminalities. And I think that supports our long-term vision that at one point in time, everyone that's connected to the Internet will have a desire to be protected for all of the things that they value from simple data to reputations, if you want. And that's our mission. That's what we've embarked on.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#8

Fantastic. When we think about the overall market opportunity and we think about the rate at which it's growing, investors like huge TAMs, a lot of growth. Obviously, the problem that you're solving is critical. And if we just think about all the multiplier and network effects, there's so much for NortonLifeLock to do. But if I were myopic, and I thought about the history of just consumer endpoint security, clearly, that would be a much less interesting opportunity than the one that you're pursuing today. Can you just help maybe to bridge investors from the past to the present and perhaps to the future in terms of how you think about the market, is there enough to go after? And how do you continue to help drive expansion of the opportunity?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#9

Yes. Let me deal on 2 fronts. On the first one, you're right. The Norton division come from protecting your device, then you move to multiple devices, multiple OS, and then there was a discussion on desktop versus mobile. And then 3 to 4 years ago, under the leadership of Greg Clark, Symantec bought Norton -- Norton Division bought LifeLock and became NortonLifeLock, first inside Symantec and now as a stand-alone company. And the vision was that, that need for security would move from device-centric to user-centric. And you as a user will have more and more of your lives being lived online. And the increase of use case, if you want, that you value would continue to increase. And so, they built that vision towards cybersafety, combining software and services to protect against criminality in the virtual world. And so when we look today at how many people are connected to the Internet, we're doing about billions. And when we look at how many people are really paying for a third-party cybersafety, I can come up with 100 million. And so, it's definitely underpenetrated view. If I make a parallelism to the physical world, in the physical world, when you value something, whether you have your car, you buy an insurance, you buy a home, you buy an alarm systems, you don't have yet the same awareness and the same reflex than in the cyber world. Yet we believe that awareness will continue to grow. And so our potential is basically that the vast majority of the people connected to the Internet have something that they value in the cyber world, and they will pay for protection against any potential criminality in that world. That's one aspect. So, for us, that's our mission, and it's a long journey, a multiyear, multi-decade journey to get there. Now in today's world, we have the old pillar of security for which the top 3 players have about 60% of the market. You still have 40% that's fragmented. And so, consolidating more market share in that area is part of our game. The second pillar is around building up from security to adjacent opportunities. So, that's identity, identity protection and restoration for us, penetrating the privacy angle, extending to connected home and families are all adjacent opportunities to security to build cybersafety. And in the third pillar, there are adjacent digital services that go with cybersafety that are potential play for us. And so that's how we really look at our overall set of opportunities.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#10

Very helpful context. Maybe if we could get into the actual numbers, you talked about a mid-single-digit growth opportunity. In the last couple of quarters, you put up 5% constant currency billings growth. The quarter before, 7%. And there were a lot of skeptics and a lot of shareholders that are obviously very pleased that you've been able to deliver that kind of growth. You're now delivering more consistently or we hope. Is there potential to even accelerate from here? What would need to happen to get there? And how much of this should we really think of as being durable?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#11

Yes. So, clearly, I talked about the potential, with billion of people connected to the Internet, 100 million or so paying for cybersafety, broadly defined. And we can continue to expand that portfolio. So, we believe the opportunity -- and more and more of your life will move online. You will have multiple identities and lives online, which can explode the number of use case we can apply our portfolio to. You're right that a year ago, nobody believed we could deliver this transition, which was really rebuild the credibility, delivering on what we said, returning to the profitability that division was at 50%, remaining the stranded cost, as you know, and building up a leadership team with the ambition to return the company to growth. When we put the mid-single-digit growth rate out there, there were a lot of questions. And we knew we didn't have the credibility to put a higher growth rate, so we put it out there and connected all the dots. We made it really essentially on the back of launching Norton 360 and increasing our marketing spend, which is really our sales force, if you want, driving the awareness for the need for cybersafety. We still have a lot more ambition than that, of course. And now we're penetrating into the next phase, which is more of a transformation phase, transforming each function of our company to accelerate the growth. At the core, it's product innovation, of course, to build up the portfolio, but it's also better structuring our brand framework. It's expanding on our distribution environment. It's really about pushing internationally versus the U.S. where we're really underpenetrated. And so when we look at all of our growth vector, we see a lot of optionalities, if you want, to both sustain the current gross level and over time accelerate it.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#12

That makes sense. By the way, I'm seeing a couple of questions that came in over email. I'm going to get to those in a moment. But maybe, Vincent, since you touched on Norton 360. It was only back in 2019, you launched this integrated platform offering consumer security from core endpoint -- antivirus to password managers and full identity protection. And you've had so much success selling into the base, I think it's now more than 50% that are already on the product, much better than I think most would have anticipated. Can you just talk us through how this has become such -- how -- why has it been received so well? And as you look out over the next 3 or 5 years, how do you see Norton 360 evolving from here? And is there eventually going to be a Norton 720? How do we think about this?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#13

Yes. So, to be clear, I'm always hungry. So, I'm always looking at what else I'm going to do next as opposed to what we've done so far. But you're right that if we look back, the vision of cybersafety came from the purchase of LifeLock, combining with Norton, expanding from core device security into the user case and providing full protection for your digital life. So, that was the vision. It took 2-plus years to integrate all of the platform. And the vision there of that common platform of Norton 360 was that for simple membership fee, you would get protection the same way that you go and pay for an insurance fee or an insurance umbrella, and you get protection of all of your assets in the physical world, you would have the same in the virtual world. And so, they came up with that vision and then common architecture, enabling many advantages like moving functionality as they commoditized kind of lowering them to the lower level of Norton 360 and bringing innovation at top of the funnel and then moving down as they become commoditized and constantly evolving that portfolio. The team had the time to prepare this launch of Norton 360 and raised different steps in our installed base, like price on single product, ending life for stand-alone certain products or certain SKUs. And by the time we launched Norton 360, we also added $100 million of marketing, as you know, to create the awareness. And that led 15 months later or now 18 months later to slightly over 50% of our installed base on Norton 360. And for the new customer coming in each quarter for the last 2 quarters, about 3/4 of the customer, choosing Norton 360 as the primary option. So, that's where we are. How far will we go in terms of penetration? Frankly, we we'll let the consumer choose. As I mentioned, the new customer coming in roughly at 3/4 on Norton 360, 1/4 not on Norton 360 for the installed base, they'll decide. And they will always have the option for certain functionality or certain product to buy those products stand alone.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#14

That makes sense. And with such a compelling value proposition, we look forward to seeing it becoming even larger and larger portion of the total base. I've had several questions come in, and as well, I planned on asking you about attrition or renewal rates. You've had benefits of this calendar year, as many businesses have, from the pandemic, greater online activity. And just as we think about renewal rates, what's the risk of renewal rates trending down? Are you -- are you already becoming -- beginning to see it just because newer cohorts are more likely to churn away? Is that the wrong way to think about things?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#15

So, let's first step back on how we look at the business. Obviously, our objective #1 is to grow our top line at the current profit level that we have. And then through the leverage of the new customers, grow our bottom line at or faster than revenue. There are multiple growth drivers. It could be new customer, it could be up-sell, cross-sell, increasing the ARPU. It could be improving the engagement and improving the retention and/or it could be growing our indirect business by partnering with other key players to go distribute into either different segment or different market internationally. So, we'll play on all of our levers. Obviously, when we grow our customer count, which is one of our multiple objectives, the first-year new customer actuate at a higher rate than the multiyear customers. And we know that and it's building to our overall model. And I do not expect for the customer that we have grown as we return from declining customer count to growing customer account to attrite at a higher rate than the normal average first-year attrition rate we've had so far. I think once you embark on that cybersafety journey, I think we have a fair chance as we continue to evolve our portfolio to retain you. And I don't think that the pandemic has created different behavior, at least for what we can see at this point in time.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#16

Got it. No, that all makes sense. Vincent, a question that was asked -- and just going back to the opportunity and competitive environment, it was framed this way, which I think is fair. Is there any reason why NortonLifeLock should be growing slower than peers, McAfee and Avast, for example, in the future? And just in terms of any competitive share losses, how to think about the share shifts within the market?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#17

Yes. And I think we've discussed our plans over the last 12 months that for a while, the consumer division inside Symantec was more focused on maximizing the bottom line versus acquiring new customers. And they were focused on fixing the Enterprise and turning around the Enterprise. Once we sold the Enterprise business to Broadcom and focused on the consumer market, our hypothesis and, of course, validated by the growth of many of our competitors, was that the market is growing. And with our vision, with the assets we had, with the brand we have, with the resources we had, we thought we could return the company to growth. Obviously, if -- when we 12 months ago came out, I would have said we'll grow high single-digit or low double digit, nobody would have believed it since even mid-single-digit was not believed by investors. We now here today -- and I think the first step of accelerating the growth is about sustaining the growth. And as we sustain, we transform the company to accelerate the growth, obviously. Outside of the fact that we are basically a 12-month-old company in terms of the focus that we have and how we're building up, we still have some catch-up to do. The big difference between competitors in my opinion today is the distribution model. As you know, we -- 90% of our business is direct to consumer. We market our message, and they come on our e-commerce platform to download the product. Some have built stronger partnership, mainly with hardware manufacturers, you know that. And that was a field that Symantec left 5, 6 years ago. And as PC stabilize, of course, and even grow now to the pandemic, that's a huge benefit. And then on the bottom of the spectrum, there is another competitor that took advantage of a freemium approach and tried to get a huge funnel to freemium and then up-selling or cross-selling from that at the lower CAC. I think when we look at distribution, I see no reason why we couldn't play across the entire spectrum. And where it makes sense, both strategically, operationally and financially, we'll continue to expand our distribution environment.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#18

That's helpful perspective. So, maybe if we could -- it seems that you've been leaning in towards into digital channels to try to better position the brand with a younger demographic. And I think you've already made some considerable progress there. I think even my kids, I've seen advertisements, whether it's been through YouTube or other social channels. But can you maybe share how much of your total marketing spend right now is being put through digital channels and some of these newer channels? And how are you measuring efficiency of that marketing spend? And maybe just give a comment on the unit economics of the customers acquired through some of these newer channels that you're focusing on.

Natalie Derse

executive
#19

Yes, Brad. This is Natalie. So, I'll take that one. So, just as a reminder...

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#20

Thank you, Natalie.

Natalie Derse

executive
#21

Yes. Everybody -- we elevated the marketing spend from $200 million to about $300 million. We did that about 5 quarters ago. So, now we're fully lapped into that. And the fact that we're still reporting growth, either in the direct acquisition or just largely speaking, in the mid-single digits, just points to we're able to find the marketing efficiency and the marketing gains in those dollars at stable levels now. You are right that we have made a conscious effort to diversify away from performance media, TV, radio, more of the longer-term channels into more of the online digital. For sure, international, we're spending in Europe. We're spending APJ at levels that we haven't before and then as well as the affiliate channel. And look, those channels definitely are more efficient. They've got a lower CAC. They expand our demographic. And we are definitely seeing the growth driven by that channel reallocation. So, the good news is we have more than enough opportunity to just optimize within. We haven't gone and swung the pendulum so far. There's still fruit to bear there. As well as what we're trying to build in-house is much more detailed around customer-driven analytics. We want to be where the customers are. We want to be at the consideration decisions and we want to be there in a format that they embrace and that they love. And so, we are looking and trying to build our analytics in-house to be much more data driven, much more customer focused and we look forward to doing that because there is so much growth to be had. Look, we're at 20 -- almost 21 million direct customers ourselves. When we add up a lot of the other known competitors, we really think that we're at 100 million customers penetrated around the world. That's a small percentage of the potential growth market out there. And so you'll see us continue to fuel the online digital channel. You'll see us try and break into new audiences through social channels, through other social media. And we're really excited about that.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#22

Natalie, maybe just to follow-up on that, in particular, you mentioned the lower CAC and what you're seeing in some of these channels. But how about on the LTV side of that equation, when we think about unit economics. Are you seeing the same -- and I know it's maybe early where you don't have enough of a track record? But any reason to believe that the opportunity to up-sell and cross-sell and/or the churn that you would expect from some of these newer cohorts might be different as compared to the average of what you see across the base?

Natalie Derse

executive
#23

We don't see a significant change in trend in terms of renewal rate/ARPU of those new customers. What I mean by that is, yes, of course, we've now posted 5 sequential quarters of net customer adds. And yes, the first-year retention rates of those is lower than our average installed base. We go into that eyes wide open. It just provides us more and more health as an inflow into our installed base and creates a bigger opportunity for us to up-sell and cross-sell. And we're looking at relatively broad-based growth, and that's why we haven't seen a significant shift one way or the other. We've seen broad-based growth across the geos. We've seen broad-based growth across our platforms. And therefore, it allows us a lot of opportunity to up-sell, cross-sell. You've heard us talk about some new features that we've introduced. PMA would be one of them, a good example of that. Privacy Monitoring Assistant is one specific way that allows us an up-sell or cross-sell opportunity that expands the value proposition of an installed base customer. And so you'll see us, through a combination of whether we're talking about more direct acquisition, whether we're talking about diversification of channels, entering adjacent markets, combined with the product innovation, you'll see us have -- take full advantage of that growth in the installed base. There's a lot of opportunity there.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#24

Got it. That's very helpful, Natalie. Maybe just to shift gears on to partnerships. So, Vincent, you said 90% of the business is effectively direct, much higher than what the heritage business was many years ago, as you talked about. I don't know if it was 4 or 5 or 5 or 6 years ago when you personally -- that the company deliberately diversified away from the OEMs, but just thinking about partnership, and I've seen in this market over the years, you and your competitors, the approach has evolved. But you spoke about a key retail win in Japan recently and a telco in Europe. Can you talk to us about the potential with some of these newer partnerships? And how are these deals typically structured? Like how are you thinking about partnering today differently than Symantec NortonLifeLock did in years past?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#25

Yes. Let me take a first crack at that. I wasn't here with Symantec 5, 6 years ago. So, I don't know how they talked about it. But definitely, with 90% direct to customer, only 10% partnership, we can see that our partnership potential, if you want, is underpenetrated. It's really about combining our offering with somebody else's offering to provide full protection to consumers. So whether it's partnering with TELUS to offer LifeLock and identity protection in Canada, or partnering with Aon to offer cybersafety, both insurance and protection or going internationally, partnering with some telcos, continuously developing our environment. You mentioned Japan. I mentioned Japan during earnings. It's definitely doing really well for us as we develop key partnerships are all ways to reach consumers. I mentioned untapped market of billions of consumers, cybersafety needs that will continue to evolve, not endpoint protection device-centric only. So, maybe in the past, it was more centered around the endpoint. And as the cybersafety vision takes hold, the opportunities for more partnership is expanding as more and more valid combination, if you want, makes sense to go and deliver a solution to consumers. Do you want to add anything, Natalie?

Natalie Derse

executive
#26

No.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#27

Okay. We've only got a few more minutes left. So, let's make sure we cover all the ground that we want to. Maybe just on M&A and investments, how do we think about prioritizing investments either organically or inorganically? And now I think with McAfee back in the public markets, there's a little bit more chatter around M&A and different combinations that make sense in this market. But regardless, how are you thinking about M&A? Are you just thinking smaller tech acquisitions? Or might there be an opportunity to do something larger scale, even venture away from cyber and into other forms of consumer safety? Consumers need a lot of things.

Vincent Pilette

executive
#28

Yes. So, at the risk of sounding a little framework structured, the first step is creating shareholder value. Today, we shifted from improving our operational excellence to focusing on growth. Obviously, we've built a company that has now credibility, delivering on what it promises, a leadership team that has the right skill set and driving a common vision, protecting everyone's digital lives and a set of capabilities that give us an advantage. As we think about growth, obviously, we now have earned the right to look at both organic and inorganic play. I think if tomorrow, we announce an acquisition, nobody would question whether we can execute on that plan. And so, operationally, we've earned the right to look at across both the views. And it starts more with the strategic investment, okay, which new market I want to address geographically, which new distribution model I want to develop or acquire, which product I want to add in the common -- the current pillars or which peers do I want to add to the cybersafety umbrella. And for each one of those questions we look at, okay, if I invest organically, here's the time to market, here's the risk, here's the advantage. And then we look at all the players in the market, and is there a way to use capital to shortcut to the benefit that we believe we can deliver. That's how we think about it. I'm sure every company is in that position, but we now are in that view. Core market can have more consolidation to security one, identity can have expansion of technology, product and services and then new services on top of that. So, it's not the lack of opportunities, but everything has to align and be run. When it comes to capital allocation, our 2 priorities are: number one, building the business using capital; and number two is buying back shares, especially at the current level.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#29

Got it. With respect for time, I think maybe just one more. Hidden asset value. So, I think there's a lot within the NortonLifeLock story, but maybe just to focus on -- well, maybe not so hidden. Can you remind us where you stand in terms of real estate up for sale after the Broadcom deal? And if -- on the flip side, are there any other liabilities related to the old Symantec business, stranded costs, et cetera, that we should be thinking about at this point?

Natalie Derse

executive
#30

Yes. First on the real estate. So, we reported -- we sold Culver City for $120 million, bringing our net proceeds to $875 million. We're on our way to the $1.5 billion. We've got Mountain View, Tucson and Dublin that are still left and held for sale. We're in active conversations around that real estate. No doubt COVID has impacted the commercial real estate market, and we're facing into that. The good news is we have time to balance it out in terms of value, price and getting those assets off our balance sheet. And so we feel pretty bullish about that. In terms of everything else related to the stand-up of the company and the sale of the Enterprise business, we are through stranded costs. We now call that our -- we're largely through our transition period, and our leadership team is fully focused on the transformation phase that we're in, focused on acceleration of growth.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#31

Awesome, Natalie. Well, thank you so much. Maybe just in parting, is there anything that I didn't ask you that you want to make sure you impress upon folks while we've got everybody's attention?

Vincent Pilette

executive
#32

No, I think you've been very comprehensive, as usual. But I would say, hopefully, it was pretty transparent that this leadership team believe there is a big opportunity in front of us. Frankly, competitive results, I think, just come from one thing, which is we are facing a growth market versus the notion that maybe antivirus device centric was declining, cybersafety is a growing opportunity. And you can be sure that we'll use all of our ability and capacity and capabilities to go and sustain and accelerate our growth.

Brad Zelnick

analyst
#33

Awesome. Well, with that, thank you again. It's always nice to see you, but even better to see you at the conference. And I think with that, we're all done. Natalie, Vincent, Mary, thank you again.

Mary Lai

executive
#34

Thank you.

Vincent Pilette

executive
#35

Thanks, Brad. Appreciate it.

Natalie Derse

executive
#36

Thank you. Bye-Bye.

Vincent Pilette

executive
#37

Thank you.

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Gen Digital Inc. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Gen Digital Inc. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.