Gerdau S.A. (GGBR4) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary

October 3, 2024

B3 - Brasil Bolsa Balcao BR Materials Metals and Mining investor_day 174 min

Earnings Call Speaker Segments

Mariana Dutra

executive
#1

[The interpreter apologizes, but no sound. Okay, now we're back.] After Japur's presentation, we'll have some time for Q&A, so you can ask questions and comments about the presentation. So Gustavo, I'll give the floor back to you.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#2

Hello good morning, everyone. Good morning. Amongst all of the things I have in my annual calendar, this is one of my favorite events. I like this event because it gives us the opportunity to tell you about things that usually we have no time to talk about such as in our quarterly earnings results. So as Maria was just saying, today's agenda, I mean, I'll start by talking about Brazil. And I know that some of you are very curious and when to talk about China and North America. I asked [ Angi ] to come to Brazil in person, so he is here in person to talk to you because in the last occasions that we had, he had a virtual participation. And Wang will talk about North America, and then during the Q&A, you will have the opportunity to talk to him and ask a few more questions. He's been with Gerdau for 35 years. He's been with me for 10 years. He was born in China. He came to Brazil when he was still very young. He went to Rio Grande do Sul. He worked with us in Brazil, then he moved to Canada where he stayed for 15 years and then he went to the U.S. where he's been for a very long time. So he came over to Brazil. He came to this event just to be with you. So before I jump into the subject of Brazil, I think the main takeaway today is that, at this point of our business and looking at all the challenges we are facing in the different geographies where we operate. I think that the phrase of the day is that there is no super bullet or no major initiatives that could promote a huge transformation to our short-term business. So once again now as we've been doing in the past 123 years, we are really focusing on our operating efficiency. We are striving to get more efficiency to save every single dollar we can. So these 3 initial bullet points, safety is our value, quality is our business, efficiency is our progress. So if you look at the safety KPIs, you will see what we have achieved in the last few quarters. Safety of our people is very crucial to our business because we certainly understand that in today's world, most competitive values have become a commodity, and what allows us to strive is the quality of our team, the quality of our people. And for us, it's very important to demonstrate the respect we have for the people that work with us every day, and also to make sure that they go to work and go back to their homes at the end of the day, very safe, not only physical safety, but mental safety, mental health, and we've been working on these areas very diligently. And I know that you, in your everyday work you are looking at what is happening today and how this mental health indicators have deteriorated after the pandemic. I would say that today among Brazilian companies, we made important advances in regards to the care we have towards our employees. So after 123 years, last year and this year, we posted the best accident rate levels. Once you care about security, this is certainly a demonstration that we are taking care of the details because we are concerned with all of the details. We look at things that are not happening the way they should happen, and our quality KPIs are also in their best level of all of our history. And our philosophy is based on details, operating efficiency. And even though we have -- I mean, look at this so intensively, now we are looking at every dollar that can be saved so that we can remain competitive. So now let me talk about the Brazil OM -- Brazil BD. I would like to talk about a topic that is probably making us loose sleep, and this is related to imports from China. Steel from China is coming to Brazil in a very unfair way. We have imported steel being sold in Brazil at lower prices than the ore prices. We know how much China pays for ore and most of it comes from Brazil. So this is an unfair competition. And China, we can even talk about that later. China is going through a transition of its business model, general business model, leaving the levels of the last few years, which was based on infrastructure, real estate and export, and now they're migrating to other areas where infrastructure and real estate no longer matter that much and they are focusing on domestic consumption. At Gerdau, we don't believe that any stimulus measure that the Chinese government may introduce or will have an effect in the short run. Therefore, we are not working with that assumption because we have to continue working with the commercial -- I mean, with the trade mechanisms, and we are making good progress in the U.S. and Mexico, but also in Brazil after a long debate. It's been now 4 months since we saw the introduction of these trade measures. It was a commitment by the federal government of Brazil, where we decided to sit down and take a closer look at all of the numbers. And based on that, we will reinstate or reinforce some measures. So after a few months, things begin to be clearer. The importers of that unfair -- still were able to find some windows like bringing that steel via Manaus, but it seems to us that some of the trade practices were not precisely according to the law. Therefore, we are telling that government that they really have to take a much closer look at what is happening to these imports through Manaus. So we already have a few numbers, and I know that you are aware of what the numbers are. And this has steered up new debates and new meetings with the federal government. So it's important that from these learnings, they can introduce measures that will indeed be able to level the playing field. I mean, there was a competition between 9% to 11%, but it never reached numbers like the ones we see today, 18%. So this is our main focus. We want to make sure, together with the federal government, that there is a trade balance that competition follows OCDE (sic) [ OECD ] numbers. So as part of a -- in terms of all of the conditions of the game, if we are playing on the same playing field, I think the competition can be fair. And in terms of steel demand in Brazil, it remains less stable. This is not a concern for us. So when we look at the members in our quarterly deliveries, the challenges we have are mainly due to the incoming of imported steel because the numbers are very sound for civil construction, infrastructure. So this gives you a general overview of how we stand. The main challenge we have in terms of the market is strictly related to our heavy plate product because the heavy plate product was mostly used in wind power and also the naval industry. And this is a segment that's struggling at the moment. We can elaborate more on that further on, especially wind power that is losing ground nowadays has impacted our deliveries and our heavy plate business. And our main challenge now is to find new markets. We have intensively looked at other possibilities for the use of heavy plate in other business segments because among all the segments I showed you in this slide, what is the most challenging one is the segment where heavy plates are more extensively used. But in general, when we look at the industry, agro industry, civil construction, demand remains sound. And the question sometimes that pops up is, what is our stake in every market. We believe that for Gerdau, civil construction is the most relevant segment. But when we started investing in Ouro Branco, in long steels, we see that our stake in the industrial segment that accounts for half of our deliveries in our shipments. At the same time, I would like to say that we continue to invest a lot in solutions that are more impacting for our customers because this is one way to fight imported steel, because once imported steel hits the country, it is mostly earmarked for distribution. So civil construction or residential or business construction. In terms of solutions and services that we render our customers, imported steel cannot compete in this regard. So a building in São Paulo that has to be delivered just in time, sometimes we deliver steel on a daily basis, because sometimes people need to make a payment overnight, and we have to deliver the steel right just in time and the steel has to be delivered in a certain order. Therefore, there are a lot of details, and that requires a good service level. And as it means to fight that imported steel, we are now providing a more encompassing portfolio to our customers. And now here, I show flat steels. Flat steel is gaining momentum in terms of our shipments. Back in 2012, we are mostly focused on long steels, but in 2017, 25% of our shipments are of flat steels. We believe that this is one of our main growth avenues going forward and investments in Ouro Branco and mining, it will make that even more possible. And next year, 40% of our shipments are competing in that segment of flat steel. Also, we are striving to develop new products, high-strength rebar, GG 70. well, we had a GG 50, but we are also developing in the past few years a broader range of products to serve the interest of our customers. And at the same time, as I said, to fight the entry of import products because oftentimes, we also have imports of commodity products. Therefore, we offer a new range of products to our customers, which has allowed us to fight import products. Not only that, but we are also working on a more intense relationship with our customers. And we are doing that through Comercial Gerdau, is a strong pillar of our businesses through Comercial Gerdau that we can serve customers in different geographies. This is a very important channel to expedite our profitability in Brazil. Therefore, Comercial Gerdau is working a lot, not only because we want to deliver distinguished services to our customers, but buying steel through digital channels, it's another area that is growing a lot. We are offering our customers a whole range of solutions, a very complete range of solutions. I mean Brazil works like that. There are many family concerns, and now they are sending the baton to the next generation. The second generation is now taking over their parents businesses. We see that more and more, and there are many changes now occurring in our customers' businesses. And the digital platforms are now growing a lot. Also, I would like to talk about some things that we've been talking about during our quarterly results calls, which is our strong performance in the cost front. I mean, Japur will talk more about it. But this reinforces what I said at the beginning because we are constantly trying to low cost. There won't be any changes in imports or exports of steel in Brazil. Therefore, our focus is towards greater efficiency. And this is what we've been trying to do throughout our 123 years of existence. Therefore, we are constantly seeking for greater efficiency. And this involves structural solutions, I would say, migration and changes, migrations of products from one mill to another. We believe that if you dilute your fixed costs, you can have better results in terms of profitability in Brazil. Historically, we operated in many mills. We have several mills all over the country, collecting scrap locally and producing products for that particular geography. We also realized that this business model in some instances, is not as efficient as we wanted, not efficient enough to compete with imported goods. Therefore, in the last quarters, we decided to make a few changes. And one classical example was our decision to close our Barão de Cocais mill in Minas Gerais. It's a very traditional mill. It's been in our company for a while. It's a mill that is not based on scrap, but charcoal and iron ore. And this mill was losing competitiveness because of increased prices of charcoal and the lower availability of iron ore with high iron grade in that Minas area, therefore, we decided to hibernate that mill in Barão de Cocais and take the mix of products because this is a very traditional mill that works with structural. So we are taking that to other plants, especially in the case of Cosigua. Cosigua is a very competitive mill. So we are running the melt shop more often and the rolling mill more often. And this brings about more productivity. We also -- we hibernated Barão de Cocais. We stopped our mill in Ceará and distributed the products to our other mills. And with that, we were able to achieve in the first quarter of this -- the first half of this year, as Japur was saying, we were able to get BRL 160 million (sic) [ BRL 150 million ]. And in the second half of the year, BRL 400 million. So annual gain is BRL 450 million. So if you look at expense costs of our Brazil BD, we are able to capture BRL 1 billion of cost reductions. And this is an example of our search for a better performance. And then when Japur comes for his presentation, you can ask him more questions. So we are able to achieve substantial gains in cost and expenses. So this is what we have for Brazil, these quarters. Another point that I think people -- it goes unnoticed is that our search for efficiency. And I would say that we always took care of traditional management, our tools. And in some cases, we became a reference in Brazil in terms of how we use those methodologies, even Six Sigma in our search for better performance. But the opportunity we found to reduce our expenses and to improve efficiencies is what we call digital transformation and the transformation of our business. People talk a lot about digital transformation in all different segments. And the difficulty in the industrial segment is to find a focus. And the alignment of factors that allow us to evolve, and we found that in the last 3 years. This is just an example, among many others of our Ouro Branco mill. The Ouro Branco mill is very complex in regards to the quality of materials, product mix. In the past, Ouro Branco focused on producing finished goods for exports and it was not as complex. But once we started to operate with structural shapes and flats, the mill can now operate with different specifications. So even with the human competence of our employees, I mean, even with that, we were able to work with efficiency, but it will be impossible to operate that mill without the use of algorithms and AI. Therefore, we are using a lot of that and all of the decisions that we make about what products we will make first or if a problem arises, what we will do next. All of that is helping us through algorithms and AI and digital tools to improve our operation, and we are able to achieve gains of BRL 100 million to BRL 200 million, BRL 200 million, BRL 300 million. Because I think I talked to you before that if a company like ours, an industrial company, not only steel, but an industrial company is capable of removing all of the existing inefficiencies through the use of digital transformation there is an additional potential of about 20% of EBITDA. This is the size of the gap, a gap that did not exist, even before the use of that digital transformation because we weren't able to tackle all these efficiencies only using human capacity. But once you add digital tools, algorithms and AI, now you reach a level of excellence in your operation that was not possible before. The question is who's going to get there first, who's going to win the race. Who will be able to structure resources. And by resources, I mean people, technology to capture that gap. And we are there, we have made a detailed calculation of how much we have gained in terms of efficiencies with these digital tools. I just need to show you that this is a new reality in our business. We've been using this more and more, not just to improve operating performance, but also safety, as I mentioned. Today, one of our leaders go to a mill, they run an AI algorithm, and they note the likelihood of having a labor accident in this certain area, and we use our resources to act and prevent incidents and accidents. The progress we've made is significant. Ouro Branco, our largest mill was the first industrial plant to have a full 5G deployed. So we have an ability to process data and images at Ouro Branco. And so the possibilities at capturing inefficiencies increases a lot. That's what we've been doing. Another point I'd like to mention with you is about the production of the hot-rolled coils will continue to manufacture flats at Ouro Branco, and now in the beginning of we'll add a new capacity of hot-rolled coils, which is a big demand from our clients. The market exists for us, and we have not been able to meet the full needs of our customers given the production limitation. So these 250,000 new tonnes of hot-rolled coils will add to our result because this growth in flat rolling capacity will be important. It will help us meet an unmet need of 250,000 tonnes a year. And perhaps to give you some more numbers. This is the progress we've had at Ouro Branco plant from the moment that we acquired this mill. It was built by the [ group ] focused on semi-finished plates, bars and billets for exports. And we have qualified the plant to produce more and more products for the domestic market products with higher added value and not export. So in 2015, 40% (sic) [ 47% ] were semi-finished, in 2025 this will be down to 11%. The goal is to totally eliminate this capacity in the future. So that Ouro Branco will be focused in high-added value products for long and flat products. This new journey will bring a significant potential of increased profitability. And this decision is very much based on the availability. We'll have of ore at 65% of iron content on that sits next to our plant. And we have been investing a lot in our mining operation. We have been operating our mine in Minas Gerais, Várzea do Lopes, and they had a cycle, the cycle is coming to an end. And this transition of Várzea do Lopes to Miguel Burnier mine, we had an opportunity to go to the market, go to market and buy more ore, had an increase in our cost, buying more ore in the market during the transition. But as of the end of next year, beginning of 2026, when the mine is again operational, we will be at a different level of competitiveness. In addition to profitability, that will increase, we'll the have the availability of ore for the next 40, 4-0 years, saving next to our Ouro Branco plant. It's what we call Miguel Burnier, it's sits 13 kilometers away from Ouro Branco, where we're building a slurry pipeline that will take the ore from the mine to Ouro Branco, there will be a significant reduction in CO2 emissions. This is a transformational development for Ouro Branco in terms of competitiveness, in terms of making Ouro Branco the next year, the most competitive integrated mill. The investment is doing really well. It's on schedule. It is a challenge to have CapEx in Brazil in terms of availability of suppliers, [indiscernible] we have a lot of risk management activities, and this investment is moving forward on schedule. We have 50% progress of physical progress, the civil works are unfolding really well. And the expectation is to have a ramp-up in 12 months. That's when we would announce the official opening of this investment at Miguel Burnier, which like I said, will increase our competitiveness for the next years for our Ouro Branco mill. We have a video of this investment, right? And then after the video, I'll turn the floor to Wang. So Wang, get ready. [Presentation]

Chia Wang

executive
#3

[We do not have the sound. We apologize but we still are not getting the sound of the speaker, please bear with us. We remain without the sound of the speaker, please bear with us. The sound is back.] Most of these [indiscernible] we consume the scrap and nearly we have 5.4 million scrap. We have obsolete scrap coming from vehicles, machinery, infrastructure and household appliances, which we call quite good. When we speak about the North America BD, we have been posting excellent results and performance not only by market resilience, but also by our commercial strategy and operating performance. Our product portfolio is well positioned to benefit from the macro trends that currently drive the demand for steel, they're qualified but they are based on reshoring, renewable projects and infrastructure projects. Our CapEx is focused on increasing organically the capacity of the mills and our product portfolio, flexibility in serving our customers, coupled with a competitive cost structure. This flexibility allows us to optimize the utilization of our production capacity along the different economic cycles, adjusting our production mix to meet market needs, maintaining a high level of productivity and operating efficiency. We also are differentiated in the market, given our commitment to produce steel with a low carbon emission. Our structural shapes, the unit has the lowest carbon emission rate in the United States. Our commercial strategy ensures adequate exposure to customers in different segments. Our operation has a customer-centric culture dedicated not only to ensuring good level of service, but also exceeding the expectations and remaining a benchmark in customer service. A strategic vertical integration ensures competitive cost and offers more options to our customers. We're expanding our ability for heat treatment and customized cutting with the new unit of solar pile processing facility that will be finished by June '25. This will ensure our scrap, raw materials at competitive price with 50% of our consumption coming from our captive scrap. After living a few years of unprecedented demand levels. The U.S steel market is gradually coming back to historical levels. As the market stabilizes, we can see a more typical demand pattern where some sectors show resilience and stronger activity than others. The construction -- the non-residential construction segment continues to post a good performance while other industrial markets are decelerating. Following general trends of the economy, 2 of the main indicators, ABI for construction and ISM PMI manufacturing reflect this trend. As you can see on the charts. ABI, Architectural Billings Index shows some variability. The ratio remains at around 50 points, which means neutrality. In 2023, dropping a little in the end of last year and fluctuating up and down in 2024. This drop in the last 12 months is directly linked to the new economic uncertainty. And -- because we have higher interest rates. however, it is important to note that the current mix of projects, which drives non-residential construction activity relies strongly on the type of construction that does not require a lot of architectural spending. So they are not captured by the indicator. The ISM PMI, which is the dynamic nature of manufacturing in North America oscillates in 2024, increasing in the first quarter with a deceleration in Q2 and Q3, indicating a modest expansion in manufacturing. Even with this apparent stabilization, we remain confident in the strength and resilience of our business. Today, the 3 macro trends that continue to drive consumption of steel in the U.S. economy, reshoring, the reshoring trends of domestic manufacturing, the development of renewable energy sources in the upgrading of the infrastructure. From 2018 to 2022, the average of construction, CPIP, and the plan was [ $7 billion ]. And this same increased to $17.1 billion in 2023. In 2024, marking a significant increase of 135%. This trend shows the commitment of the United States to domestic manufacturing, which promotes long-term economic stability. CHIPS and Science Act was fundamental to reinforce advancement of domestic chips in semiconductors. CI -- average of [ CPIP ] to increase competitiveness of the country in technology was 9.4% in the first period in contrast with 2023, '24 increasing to $21.1 billion reflecting an increase of about 124%. This is really, really substantial. The significant investment highlights the strategic focus of the United States in strengthening the chips production chain for several companies geared to technology. In addition, the Infrastructure Investment and Job Act earmarks resources to support highway and general infrastructure spend. From 2018 to 2022, the [ CPIP ] was $18 billion versus $8 billion, increasing to 11.3% or a 33% increase. The increase in investments and infrastructure is vital for economic development because it reduces cost of transportation and stimulates job creation. Lastly, the United States continue to move forward in transforming their energy metrics moving towards clean and renewable energy. The Inflation Reduction Act which funded several solar and wind projects explains this. So when we look at the map, we can see the number, the quantity of these projects in these 3 fronts, very, very significant, and that increases significantly the consumption of steel. All of this results in strong economic fundamentals in North America, providing a solid foundation for future growth and resilience. Given -- even considering the fluctuations at the market. In recent years, we strategically diversified exposure to consumption market so that we can benefit from sectors that boost growth such as data centers, industrial buildings, and factoring plants, hospitals, infrastructure and renewable energy. These sectors remain strong. And they're pushed forward by significant government projects to develop infrastructure and technologies. On the other hand, we know the challenges faced by other industries, including office buildings, manufacturing in general, truck trailers and agricultural equipment. These sectors are impacted by a slower economic activity. We continue to invest in key growth areas to mitigate this impact effectively to sustain our positive performance. As you can see on the slide, we are well positioned to meet the needs of renewable and infrastructure segments as well as the construction of data centers and plants. For renewable energy, we offer a wide array of products, which are essential or the building of wind and solar projects. Our structural shapes are used in solar post, beams and present in many other applications or wind towers, SBQ using fasteners, anchoring equipment and rebar for foundations. Regarding infrastructure, our products meet the demand for highways, the building of bridges and with the IIJA, we help expand infrastructure in North America, improving our position in the market. In addition, we are prepared to supply the growing need to build data centers and manufacturing plants. Our structural, frames, joists, rebar and piling for foundation are essential for these manufacturing plants that require high technology. So I conclude saying that this slide reinforces that we are prepared to navigate this new cycle and meet the needs of new sectors that have more growth at the moment. In recent years, we made significant progress through our recent strategic CapEx projects. In Petersburg, Virginia, we were successful in an initiative that allows us to produce a wider array of piling equipment by introducing new sizes to meet market demand. So we increased efficiency and expanded ability to sell additional tonnes of this product, which is highly profitable. We doubled the volume on this product. In Petersburg and Midlothian in the middle of the slide, we introduced a heavier wide flange beam sections increasing our offering to the solar construction market. We increased our range now with heavier products that we did not have before. In Midlothian and in Cartersville operations, we increased the additional wide flange beams, which are essential for solar power. And as I have been saying during this presentation, these investments highlight our dedication to serve our customers with high-quality products, which are also very profitable. Over the last few years, we adopted a strategy to make internal improvement adding products with higher added value. And also, we focus on our main assets that we call powerhouse. These are the Midlothian and Petersburg plants, Cartersville, Jackson and also Ontario in Canada. Through that, we were able to reduce cost and maximize our assets. These investments are supposed to improve the product arrangement, productivity, efficiency and everything that has an impact on our cost structure. In addition to everything we talked before, you see that in 2023, we modernized -- and we made a very new melt shop in Whitby. And we also promoted heat treatment processing, downstream in Midlothian. This is one of the most modern facilities in North America. And in 2024, I mean, in the current year, we concluded our investments in the Jackson rolling mill, so that the range of merchant structures, I mean, it's complete. Today, we cover the entire range of structurals and not only that, but we also produce rebars in that same mill. We want to have a one-stop shop mill where the customer will be able to be served completely with all the products they need. We also initiated investments in Midlothian. This is our largest mill in North America. And this is a long-term investment. It would take about 3 years. This will require a bulkier investment, not only this year or the coming year or the years to come? And more recently, this year, we acquired Dale's Recycling in Tennessee. We are -- where we acquired a scrap facility that will help us with the supply of captive scrap. And there will be other opportunities in the future to strengthen our own scrap business. And another investment is the downstream, and they will support the piles for the solar system. We want to have our own processing. I mean, 50% of our capacity, and this will help us increase market share and not only that, but we will be able to offer higher added value. The other project -- I mean this project started in 2024, but it will last until '26. I think there will be many significant investments going forward. The intention here is to allow all of these mills to compete on equal footing with all of the other companies in North America. We also believe that the sustainability of our industry will increasingly be crucial. We want to produce structural steel with the lowest emission compared to other plants in the U.S. Our commitment with sustainable practices is very apparent throughout our operations. If you look at all the mills in North America, we have the top 3 lowest emissions producing mills. As we reduce our carbon footprint, we also ensure that not only our steel has better quality, but we are also contributing to a more sustainable planet supporting our customers and reaching our sustainability goals. We believe that our customers will be increasingly demanding in that regard. Our dedication to sustainability goes beyond carbon emissions in North America. All of our facilities are scrap-based, producing steel with greater than 96% recycled content, not only that, but we use almost zero iron, which would be iron ore DII. We use economic scrap from obsolescence. In North America, we are also proud to say that we use 99% of water reused in our processes, reinstated our commitment to environment management responsible for natural resources. Gerdau's efforts and sustainability is recognized through the achievement of the B Corp certification. We are the first steel mill in the U.S. to achieve the certification. Other initiatives like a solar farm of 80 megawatts in Texas in the Midlothian plant is another proof of our sustainability footprint. The solar project can supply 20% of the total energy necessary for the Midlothian plant. And this is the equivalent to 50,000 households and its benefits are not yet included in our GWP figures. So my presentation ends here. And now I turn the floor to Japur, who will talk about special steels.

Rafael Japur

executive
#4

[Interpreted] Good morning, everyone. It's always a pleasure for me to be with you. We are used to talk to you every quarter, but it's very good to be here with you in person to talk more about our long-term view and what is the Gerdau that we want to build for the future. I will start my presentation with Special Steels. Special Steel is probably a segment of Gerdau that is not very well understood by many investors. So I think this is a very good opportunity for us to clarify that. Special Steels. I mean, our portfolio is very sound. And all the steel we produce is scrap based. All of our production of Special Steels comes from recycling scrap. And the main product we have, both in our Brazil BD and the U.S. BD, our rolled bars and downstream bars kept the level that clients want, which are the blanks. But in Brazil, in addition to the products, we also produce wires, iron ore and forged bars. So this steel is mainly used in applications for spare parts for the automotive sector, transmission, engines, hydraulic transmissions, suspension and eDrive in the car in the case of electric vehicles. And for this reason, we could say that 100% of our sales are for the direct customers. We do very little shipments to distributors. I mean it's steel that has a name and a surname. Everyone in the melt shop knows where that steel they are making is going to, for what product, for what application and for what vehicle, I would say. That is the area where we have more patents, more brands. And our commercial relationship is probably deeper. And as I said here before, the main segments where we operate is the automotive, light vehicles, heavy vehicles, passenger cars, motorcycles, buses, but we also serve important sectors of the economy like agriculture, green light, yellow light, construction and a wide range of all other segments in infrastructure like mining, energy and transportation. Now thinking about each of our operations in Special Steels, we have production facilities in Brazil and in the U.S. In Brazil, and in the U.S., in general, we can say that 80% of our shipments in that segment of Special Steels goes to the automotive industry. But I should make a small distinction. When we think about the Brazil operation where we have similar production capacities. And when we think that the final target market in Brazil is -- in Brazil, there is a higher number of heavy vehicles when compared to light vehicles mainly due to the way our assets are and the demand of the local market, whereas in the U.S., given the market dynamics and the specialization of our assets in our mills, basically, 80% of all of our shipments, the main product is light vehicles. So we are present in these 2 geographies, but we operate and sell to all the countries in the Americas, in addition to some other markets in Europe. Therefore, we are the largest producer of SBQ. And we will see terms interchanging. We are the largest producer of SBQ in the Americas. Now, this slide gives an overview of the market and what we see going forward. We understand that even with the production of electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, and given the increase of the use of steel in the vehicle fleet, both in Brazil and the U.S., we understand that both markets in the mid-range post good growth outlook and good demand increase. But I would like to highlight something that appears on the left-hand side. What the analysts do is look at the number of inhabitants over the number of cars in different economies. But once we compare Brazil, I mean -- let's not look at the comparison with the U.S. because maybe it's not an adequate comparison given the fact that these are 2 different countries. But when we compare the ratio of -- the ratio of inhabitants per vehicle in Brazil to countries that are very similar to Brazil, like Argentina and Mexico, if Brazil had the same number of inhabitants per vehicle that Argentina has, our steel -- our Special Steel production from vehicles would be 16% higher than what we have today. We are not even comparing ourselves to Europe or Japan, but only to Argentina. And if we compare ourselves to Mexico, a country that is similar to Brazil, I mean, per capita GDP is similar to that of Brazil. It will be -- we would have to produce 33% more SBQ for the automotive market. So as the income increases, we will be able to increase our penetration, given the increased size of the fleet in Brazil. But now looking at 2025, given the fact that the market would remain stable -- I mean, stable but it's not free from challenges. As Gustavo said earlier on, we continue to see an important pressure coming from imported steel, but not only imported steel, but also parts and vehicles, because they also compete for market share with us. I have 2 challenges in my presentation today. I had to talk about CapEx and try not to hit that glass of water because usually I do that. Well, I try to work on the second. When we think about our CapEx, our CapEx program for the past few years, our CapEx for Special Steels is very much focused on increasing the competitiveness of our assets in the long range and also improving customer service. And I would like now to highlight our main projects. And by doing so, I think this will become clearer. In 2022, we concluded a very relevant investment, which was continuous casting of Pindamonhangaba. It started at the end of 2022, but since it's a segment of Special Steels that involve certification with our clients in the production routes because, as I was saying, this steel has name and surname. So we managed to achieve impressive gains in keeping with what we expected, and we will continue to capture that. And not only with that investment, we were able to produce cleaner and steel of better quality, but we were able to reduce our production costs, improving the metallic gain, diminishing our inefficiencies and also reducing GHG in the process. The second investment I would like to highlight is something that is being concluded now, tests will start in November. This is the peeling line in Charqueadas. We will be able to produce products with a higher superficial control, operations that are very critical in relation to the microns that are needed for the size of the bar for final applications. So that level of precision and control requires a distinguished process. And with this new investment, we will have higher productivity, less waste, and we will be able to ensure a product of better quality, improving our portfolio of premium products of Special Steels in Brazil. And last, but not least, we will continue working in our recycling operation in Pindamonhangaba, not only ferrous scrap, but not non-ferrous scrap. But with this investment, we will increase efficiency of steel production, we will produce cleaner steel, higher competitiveness of our industrial process. And by the same token, we will reduce our emissions of GHG. Now, as we are talking about Special Steels, and we were talking about North America, with the next maintenance shutdown that will occur in the first quarter of next year, we will now conclude our investment in Monroe. This is a long-term investment. It's extremely critical for the future of our Special Steel operations in North America. This investment checks several boxes. Once the investment is concluded, we will be able to expand our production capacity in Monroe by almost 200,000 tonnes, our production cost and efficiency in the downstream cost. I mean the cost of transforming scrap all the way to the final product will cost less because the mill will be more efficient. We'll also be able to produce more steel that is less contaminant, we will improve our total mix of products. And as part of the process, because it's more efficient, we will be able to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases. So as we're talking about GHG emissions, it's important to say the Special Steel operation is the first operation that produces for the automotive industry in the U.S. that has a B Corp Certificate. And this is what Wang said in his presentation. And as part of that technological advancement and our commitment towards decarbonization, we started a study together with the Purdue University in the U.S. and other steel milling companies in the region, a study to replace in our reheating furnaces, we will replace natural gas by hydrogen. And this reinstates our long-term commitment towards decarbonization in a sector that is so important. So we are -- we will reduce emissions and for the production of electric and hybrid vehicles. This is increasingly important. Well, thank you very much for your attention so far. And now I will turn the floor to Mariana Dutra because she will talk about our South America operation.

Mariana Dutra

executive
#5

Thank you, Japur. Our presentation in South America is another example of how we can adapt our strategy depending on the reality of each of the markets and how these markets are impacting the demand for our products. More recently, we sold our stakes at the JVs at the Dominican Republic at Diaco and Gerdau Metaldom for $325 million. So our product portfolio and our capacity today is split between Uruguay, Peru and Argentina with approximately 1 million tons of growth -- gross and rolled steel. As we saw in our previous presentations for Brazil and North America, this is a business operation that is 100% focus on producing metallic scrap and long steels, ensuring our commitment to sustainability. Also, our SIDERPERU operation was one of the first companies in the world to be B Corp Certified along the lines of what the company is looking for in terms of ensuring sustainability in all of those operations. Our distribution of the portfolio today is mainly geared towards production portfolio, civil construction and the industry with 10% of the distribution of the portfolio. Now when we look at the market overview, we have Peru. They went through a period in 2023 of a greater turmoil, not only in the political front, but also in terms of climate with El Niño that affected the demand for steel in the region and throughout 2024, we are seeing the rebound of not only our results, but also our shipments in the region. And then when we look at what was behind this that is civil construction, industry, mining and public works that are developing in the country with the aim to serving our customers in that region. Even better, we are investing more than $20 million in the rolling mill. This will add about 12% our capacity for rolled products in Peru. Now looking at Argentina, despite the fact that the economic landscape is still challenging, and there is a temporary instability in steel demand, we believe in a gradual rebound of the country throughout 2025, given all the measures that are being announced especially in relation to the economy of the country. The country is mostly driven by farming and oil and gas industries. And in the presentation on the Brazil BD, the participation of Commercial Gerdau as a good channel to serve our customers, it's also a booster to increase internal demand. When we look at Uruguay, we see constant demand along steel sustained by public and private works, but mainly linked to the infrastructure segment. And again, Gerdau remains very committed to met the demand of these growing markets, although it's not such a big operation, it is really representative for our portfolio of products. I turn the floor back to Japur. He could rest for just a little bit.

Rafael Japur

executive
#6

Great, Mary. It just gave me an opportunity to drink some water. Well, I swear that I will be brief and we'll get to the Q&A really soon. I mean we have to speak about our long-term business And we have to thank and acknowledge all of our employees, all of our teams. When we look at a long-term film, of everything we've built -- in terms of results, performance and everything we delivered to the company and our shareholders, I think it becomes very clear, the effort that everyone made for us to have the kind of balance sheet we now have and the leverage that we have that allows us even in the not-so-positive scenarios in 2021, '22 to have a very solid level of [ interactiveness ], even in not so positive, in challenging scenarios. So before anything, we have to thank all of our employees, each and every one of them. When we assess our balance sheet using different metrics. Other liquidity or cash position, rating, we can say that given all of our effort and hard work, we enjoy a differentiated position regarding our balance sheet. All was built not just with work, but with a clear north we have in terms of our financial policy, which we follow every day, our controls, our committees, our Board of Directors and all of that translates into an upgrade, where we got just yesterday by Moody's and now through rating agencies placing Gerdau to notice above investment grade, which really helps us in funding the capital market. And this was positive news. Why is this relevant for Gerdau? Because when we look at our balance sheet, we realized more than 80% of our funding sources come from the capital markets, either offshore or domestic capital markets. So for us to have these credit metrics in a cyclical industry, there will face difficulties, ups and downs, good and not so good moments. It is absolutely fundamental in our understanding in a centennial company to have a solid financial position. So I'll speak more about the capital markets. Normally, we don't speak a lot about equity, but it's something to be highlighted here. We have products and we access both the capital market locally via debentures and via our partners, commercial banks and directly from institutional investors and individual investors and the international market through bonds. And I think that something that reflects our financial philosophy of doing business is that when we observe the spread, the difference between attaining treasury bond in the U.S. and our 2030 Gerdau bond, we can see the lower curve that basically is the spread, the volatility of our bond is really very small. This clearly shows how robust and resilient our credit metrics are with low implicit risk if you invest in debt and bonds of Gerdau. When we think about the spread, how much it costs Gerdau to issue a bond compared to U.S. treasury, and when we compare with local steel companies producing steel in Brazil and iron. And even if we look at the bottom part of the left, we can see that the spread level how much of the investor demand to buy and invest to Gerdau Securities, we are much more aligned with our international peers. And I mean U.S. companies rather than Brazilian peers. This shows the diversification of our assets and our financial [indiscernible]. When we speak about capital allocation, this is absolutely a key in a capital-intensive industry like ours. We like to understand capital allocation in 2 ways. We have continuous efforts, continuous capital allocation every day, every week, every month. That's the work we do. And also opportunities. In our continuous efforts of capital allocation, we have a dividend policy to distribute at least 30% of our net income to our shareholders. We have a strong and important focus on cost-cutting initiatives to cut cost of our production and to optimize our assets when necessary. We've approved that several times, and we have a stable maintenance CapEx very much in line with our depreciation. So we have been treating our assets really well in the long term. And like I said, we have maintained our financial discipline in terms of our leverage, U.S. and BRL debt, the balanced leverage. So we can have flexibility and agility to face difficulties we might face in the market. Now on the right of the slide, we have the opportunities. And that's some things we've been doing in a recurring fashion and how we can allocate capital more strategically in the long run. So here, we have a share buyback program. We've been doing -- been implementing this program for quite a few years. Now I'll give you more details on our share buyback program. We have the extraordinary payments to shareholders, and that we've had these extraordinary payments in recent years and that strategic CapEx to ensure organic growth of the company in those assets that we understand are critical. And with the greatest ability to create value in the long run for our shareholders. And I guess that we've been very thorough and thoughtful about mergers and acquisitions. Mariana reminded us that this year -- it seems like a long time ago, but we sold our assets in Colombia and the Dominican Republic because we understood that these were not our core business anymore. A good part of these proceeds were reinvested. For example, in energy generation, with the new wave investments or buying and investing in other long-term capabilities for our assets, as Wang mentioned in the recent acquisition of scrap in North America to ensure long-term availability of this raw material, which is so critical to us. Now speaking about our long-term strategic CapEx. This is my second challenge of the day. This is a slide, which I believe all of you know. Since our last stakeholder Day, Investor Day last year, we've been presenting this. And we understand that this is a good moment to revisit the slide. I'll try to do this now. And then during the Q&A, I will be available. Over time with these 11 key critical super strategic projects, there are 4 that are finished or about to be finished. So it doesn't make sense to keep reporting over and over on these projects because in our quarterly disclosure calls, you'll see the results of these projects. So here, we'll focus on those projects that make more sense that we pay attention to. So what are the changes that we have compared to the previous slide in this new slide of the strategic investments. We are basically removing those 4 projects that are complete or about to be completed. So basically, the outlays is clear for those. It is up to us to deliver the results that we set out to deliver when we approved and made these investments. So this is one of the changes we excluded these 4 projects. The second thing is something that many investors ask us about, and quite appropriately ask about the possibility to invest more in downstream in North America, in downstream capacity. And Wang has presented in his part of the presentation, what we are doing to meet critical needs with more added value, for example, to the solar power industry and the thermal treatment of differentiated steel in North America. So we understand that it is important that we track these investments in downstream in North America, because they're becoming more relevant now. In addition, the second change we have, I mean, there so many changes in our long-term strategy. But in the last block, about competitiveness in forestry base. This is not new to you, Gustavo mentioned that this year, unfortunately, given the predatory arrival of imported products in Brazil, we had to hibernate 2 of our units, Barão de Cocais and the pig iron production in Sete Lagoas. But we understand that with these hibernation, we have the need to invest less in the forestry base than if these operations were operational in the next 2 years, because we already have a very representative and relevant inventory of planted areas and forestry. So with our capital allocation, we understand that there is room here to invest less in the first base, then we would be investing if these mills were operational. And that's why we are revisiting this block of forestry-based competitiveness. So we had an expected way of our strategic CapEx of about BRL 6.3 billion, and we're actually investing BRL 5.8 billion. So this is basically the changes we've made a few changes, more qualitative ones, which we believe translate better what we are doing today at Gerdau. And this is just to track the projects that we're excluding from the slide, which are complete or about to be completed. Those in the rolling mill capacity mentioned by Juan, investments in our melt shop with the unit, that's completed. It is in the ramp-up phase. The new continuous casting in Pinda. We can see the results, as mentioned before, and investment in the Monroe road map, completing the Monroe road map. It will be done now beginning of next year, when we have the maintenance downtime, all of the interventions have been made, but we need a maintenance downtime to really start operating at full speed. And here, on the right we have the expected results for each one of the projects that remain ongoing in our portfolio of strategic CapEx here. No relevant updates. Perhaps the only update here is how much we expect to create in terms of value with the investments in downstream in the North America BD. And we have to clearly speak about shareholders' returns. After all, we are in an investors meeting. Our commitment to shareholder returns is absolutely unnegotiable. And we have demonstrated this over time, we are distributing a whole lot of value to our shareholders substantially above our 30% dividend payout policy, which is already above what is required by law. In the last quarterly earnings results call, we spoke about our share buyback program. In Q3, with the position we closed at the end of September, at Gerdau S.A., we had 27% execution of the share buyback program equivalent to buy 19 million shares, repurchased BRL 250 million investment. So we repurchased almost 1% of Gerdau's market cap. In the case of Metalurgica Gerdau, very similar, executed 27% of the size of the program as originally planned, we practically repurchased BRL 19 million, invested almost 1% of the company's market cap. That's what we did from August 1, September 30. In your commitment, we not only announced our commitment to increase the remuneration of our shareholders, but we are also actually implementing the strategy. I think that this is an important and relevant way of valuing and rewarding our long-term investors because we are [ perennial ] solid, robust company, but we are also a company aiming at the long run. We frequently asked about why the share buyback and not dividend. I guess it's this philosophy. It's rational. We understand that Gerdau shares today are depreciated considering a number of metrics. When you think about something very simple, price to book value, today Gerdau has a ratio of 0.70. So it's 30% below its balance sheet, it's book of value, way below it's replenishment value. And when we add the parts, which is something very common. So when I break down each one of Gerdau's BD, business divisions, we see the results generated in the last 12 months. And when I compare with the multiple of several other companies up here, our competitors that are also listed companies. And when I add how much implicitly each one of Gerdau's BD should be valued compared to the peers, we get to an implicit firm value close to $10.5 billion. Well, the exchange value on June 30, actually had a certain rally in recent weeks, but the number is not so different. We can see the current equity value is [ $7 billion ], like [ $10 billion ], which would be if we summed up the parts comparing to our peers. We think that this value asymmetry does not make sense. We believe that by buying back the shares under these conditions, we are rewarding. We are aligned with our long-term investors. We see this as very adequate to allocate our cash flow at this point. Lastly, speaking about the long term, since we're talking about long-term return, we have to talk about that, but also about sustainability. And here, I just want to highlight once again Gerdau's outstanding position regarding greenhouse gas emissions, if we compare our company with our peers and with the average for the sector. Gerdau today, with our numbers published for 2023, we have a level of emissions of 0.91 tons of CO2 equivalent for every ton of steel produced. This is less than half of the average of the sector. So I will repeat this is less than half average for the sector. It does mean that from now to 2030, the whole steel making segment reduces by half, there's CO2 emissions and greenhouse gas emissions, still they're not going to get to the current level of greenhouse gas emissions like Gerdau. So we are totally in an outstanding position, but this is not enough for us. We'll do more. We have a commitment to reduce even further from 0.93 tonnes to 0.82 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per ton of steel produced. And all we said in this presentation how we are allocating capital and investing CapEx. All of that combines with this strategy to reduce CO2 emissions and to improve our capital allocation. We are talking about having more productive assets, [indiscernible] efficiencies, producing higher added value steel, higher-quality steel, increase our processing and use of scrap and investing in renewable energy, having more and more access to renewable and clean energy in all of our operations, thus fulfilling our commitment to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions. With this, I'll close and I will now turn the floor to Gustavo Werneck for the final takeaways, and I'll be around for the Q&A.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#7

[Interpreted] You can stay here because this is going to be quick. I have just 1 slide. Just a summary of everything we've said. I guess that this summarizes everything we presented. This is our commitment. We're committed to sustainable growth. We'll continue to grow with our feet on the ground, with all the lessons learned along 123 years of history, I understand that in the geographies we chose to operate, these will be the geographies for the future. We have no plan and no wish to go back to a country where we used to be that we decided to exit. We have no wish to go to new places. We understand the Brazil, Mexico and Canada -- brazil, U.S. and Canada are the countries where we can continue to grow, focus on our target audiences, stakeholders, not just you that invest with us today, but creating when were customized solutions to our customers. We are committed and have always been committed to being more and more efficient and returning to society, everything that society has been lending to us over time. Our efficiency translates into creating social environmental value, value for people and greater discipline. Discipline marks our history and we mean, disciplined at working more and more efficiently, seeking the potential we know is out there doing everything we do in a more competitive way. So we're going to close the presentation, right, Mariana let's start the Q&A session. So Wang, please join us here so that we can focus on this new part of this meeting.

Mariana Dutra

executive
#8

So We will organize our Q&A very briefly, and then we will open for questions for those that are here in person. And maybe some sell-side analysts who is joining us from home, and we can also put them on video. So you 3, you can see that. So I'll start with Caio. Please state your name and company before you ask your question. And the microphones will get to you.

Caio Ribeiro

analyst
#9

[Interpreted] I'm a Caio Ribeiro from Bank of America. My first question is on the captive scrap market. We noticed that you have a large amount of captive scrap in Brazil. And more recently, as you were saying, you acquired a collection and scrap processing in the U.S. I would like to exploit the strategy behind that, whether you want to replicate this model of having a larger stake of captive scrap in the U.S., just as you have it in Brazil and what are the advantages you see with that based on that strategy? And secondly, speaking about your asset portfolio in your South America BD, we've noticed that throughout time, you made some divestments in some geographies. And today, in the countries where you are -- do you believe that you have the adequate portfolio, you have a relevant pricing power or a relevant market share? Or you still think that there will be more change coming forward and more divestments going forward?

Unknown Executive

executive
#10

[Interpreted] Thank you, Caio. Okay. I'll give you a general answer on scrap and Wang from North America can add to my answer. First, the scrap market in Brazil in the U.S. is very clear. I mean the markets are different, and they will remain different for many, many years to come. The U.S. has gone through the consolidation and professionalization of the scrap market. There are large scrap dealers, and they deal with well-structured companies. We are operating in North America differently than in Brazil. This recent acquisition is in line with the opportunities that we see in that market, which is a bit more formal in structure and one can also elaborate on that acquisition of that scrap mill in Tennessee. We want to focus on increasing the amount of captive scrap. We need a lot of scrap there. I mean there are many opportunities in that area in the U.S. I mean in Brazil, in the next decade, we won't see any significant change. The market is very fragmented. It's a very scattered market. The scrap has to move around. It's very -- I mean, it's well scattered. It's a poor scrap when compared to the U.S. In the U.S., people buy a new refrigerator almost every month, and they change their products more frequently. And the same thing doesn't happen in Brazil. I mean the refrigerator doesn't go to scrap, is donated to another family elsewhere, and that refrigerator will be used for many more years to come. So it will last much longer until 1 day it becomes scrap. Now in every community, in every municipality to collect all that scrap and make it flow. It's something that matters to us. It's very important to us. When we build that stage in Rock in Rio event, we wanted to talk about scrap because that's a topic that is not very well known. There are about 1 million people in Brazil that live on collecting scrap, they work for co-ops. And we are trying to work towards giving them better life conditions. But there are dozens or thousands of small partners of small scrappers that are scattered throughout the country. So in Brazil, we are increasing the number of scrap collection or scrap picking. Scrap is scattered all over the country. So our strategy is to increase our penetration. And this won't change. But in North America, we've seen more opportunities of having a very competitive scrap because I was -- as I was saying, that's a more difficult market. We cannot collect scrap the way we do it in Brazil. I think, Wang, maybe you could tell more about what we did in North America and what we see going forward.

Chia Wang

executive
#11

That's a very good question. When we talk about scrap in North America, I think you have to take a step back because it is very clear that there is a strong migration in the integrated part, especially in terms of flats and electric furnace. So when you first look at the U.S., you say, okay, it's an exporting country with an excess of scrap, they export [ 17 million tonnes ]. But when you look at the different regions, things may change. Some regions may even lack scrap. And this new capacity of the electric furnace will make the scrap collection even more competitive. So we have assets in core activities, and we want to be the masters of our own fate. So you could pay more from traders, but then you lose in the margin. So our type of scrap, the scrap that we use is not high and it's not big iron or iron ore. We also want -- we want economical scrap from obsolescence. And in order for that to happen, you have to have the scrap yards or when you capture that scrap you get ferrous and nonferrous. So you have to select them, you have to segregate them. You have to know how to deal with the non-ferrous scrap and send a good part of that scrap to shredders, and we have shredders in our networks. And that's not different from a melt shop or rolling mill. The assets have to be operated. You have to have a high utilization rate and it's important that you have in-feed per shredder and in the U.S. that comes from old vehicles and you capture that in the yards. Therefore, it's important that you have a network within the concept of a mini mill, you want to have scrap collection around your assets or your steel milling plants. So it depends from one market to the next. So this new acquisition reflects our strategy. So if you ask them, what you intend to do? We intend to expand that further because we will be able to master our own scrap fate, and scrap will become even more valuable in time. And this will also help us to improve our cost and productivity.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#12

South America, do you answer that part?

Rafael Japur

executive
#13

Sure. We are very happy with the existing portfolio. I think Mariana even said that we made some investments to expand capacity or organic investments as the one in Peru. And then if we take a step back, it hasn't been long since we inaugurated a melt shop in Argentina. When we started, we were only producing rolled products in Argentina. We only had a rolling mill. So at present, we do not intend to change our portfolio in terms of countries or geographies. But it doesn't mean that we don't see value or even potential to improve what we have in our existing assets.

Leonardo Correa

analyst
#14

This is Leo Correa from BTG Pactual. My first question goes to Wang, and the question is about profitability in the U.S. We noticed a strong drop in the past quarters. The margin at one point was 30% and now it's going to 16%, 17%. We saw a major effort in Brazil and the results are quite successful. Can you tell us something about like the micro side of the company in the U.S., whether you have anything ongoing and any focus related to cost cuts in terms of the margin composition. I know that this is more related to the country's position. I want to know whether Gerdau intends to go back to that 20% level. And the second question goes to Werneck. I think the story remains focusing on imports, and unfair trade practices. It is very clear to all players that the quota system didn't work. The level of penetration of imported goods exceeds 20%. I think the surprise -- the major surprise were volumes from the domestic market that increased. But in terms of imports, nothing changed. You said that you will revisit that after 4 months, but what do you have in store? What are the things that you're going to ask for? What are the alternatives? What is feasible in an environment and certainly, I mean, the government has its interest. They do not want to compromise their position with China, and there is a strong lobby. So can you tell us a bit more about what you anticipate going forward?

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#15

I mean the issue of still coming from China and also other Chinese products that are present in different segments of our economy is a matter of concern, not only in the short run. We are looking at what is happening in the other debates. In the last 4 days, [indiscernible] published 4 articles on deindustrialization. And very few academics or thinkers can probably understand the significant damage that in the long range, this deindustrialization can cost to Brazil. I mean the only country that didn't deindustrialize below the U.S. was Mexico. And Mexico, the industry accounts for 25% of GDP and Brazil is losing ground. Brazil is a young economy, and as such, the country cannot sustain itself in the long range if they dismantle its industry. Industry in Brazil accounts for 25% of all of the collection. If the Brazilian industry is losing in terms of its size, the country will be unfeasible. So the debate is about deindustrialization. My grandmother used to say back then, that in a house when there is no bread, everybody fights and nobody is right. What we see with the Federal Government is a debate whereby some segments of the economy may be for a short-term need. They advocate that Brazil should be totally open to imports. But it would just be a matter of time until these imports will reach everyone. I mean it's hitting the steel industry, but it will soon hit everybody else and deindustrialization will continue. I think the players in the Federal Government can understand this thing about creating jobs and income. But it's very difficult to compromise because of China, whereas at the same time, you have to defend the industry in other segments that are very important to our economy. It's very -- it was very difficult to deploy this measure of quota and tariff. I think the most difficult phase has been overcome. But now it's difficult to say how long it will take for us to measure the actual effects of this measure? We wish it would be just 3 months. For operating reasons, the Federal Government -- I mean, we accepted that 4 months would be a reasonable period. And that period mature at the end of September is exhausted. But we managed to get some gains in terms of reducing imports. But we think about holes. I mean, it's full of holes and water is leaking. One example is Manaus. One measure of trade measure does not supersede other commercial agreements like the one with Egypt that prevails over that trade practice, that is the GPs in Brazil, the ICMS in the state of Santa Catarina and shocking when you look at these 4 months, and you see that steel imports are still growing, and they're coming through Manaus. So the Federal Government has to put a magnifying lens. What is happening there? Because certainly, on the side of traders and importers, they are looking for easier ways to avoid paying that 25%. The Federal Government is open to the discussion. We are debating that very intensively, but people are finding other channels, and Manaus is one of these examples. There is also the issue of that additional 30%. In our view, that was a mistake. That should be eliminated. And there are other NCMs, meaning that there are products that were not included in that nomenclature, and they should be included. That's a journey that will continue to evolve. And there is no other way around it because the damage can be significant. The issue is finding an adequate balance. I would say that the most difficult phase is in the past. And I think now within industry, we will find some alternatives to strike a balance between maintaining the industry that allows us to compete on equal footing. And then we will still see the entry of imported steel in Brazil as it was in the past, which was around 10%. I'm optimistic in terms of what lays ahead. But it's a daily battle, and now going to Wang. And like he said in his introduction, I think our major journey working together is that we have to have a deep understanding of all of the opportunities that we see ahead of us. So we will work to achieve that competitive level that we aim for. We were talking a few days ago, and we recalled my speech from 7 years ago. There was a gap in productivity in the U.S., about $30 per tonne. So we drew up a plan of that $30 reduction, $15 would come from the taxes that Wang said. And the additional $15 per tonne that we had, we would aim to achieve operating efficiency. So today, we are competing on equal footing with any other steel producer in the U.S. That is very clear to Wang. And what I'm telling him all the time is that that's not enough, we have to aim for more. We have an alignment of our efforts. But I want to hear from him what he wants to do because we have to go for more. I think we can achieve more using traditional methodologies, but also through advances and capital. I'm also curious to hear what you have to say.

Chia Wang

executive
#16

Well, that's a double demand. That's not a question. That's a challenge, and I pose that challenge to myself every single day. But let me go back. Let me rewind a bit. The last 4 years, if you were to ask me 20 years ago, I would never think that this could be possible or could happen. So I think you should understand maybe that the cycle will go back to a more normal cycle. But in fact, if you look at the U.S. market with the same size of demand 10 years ago, we had much smaller spreads. And what happened? Well, I think there was consolidation. There are 2 or 3 companies that are in its right place. The U.S. is more concerned about preserving its manufacturing base as something strategic. And the market, again, is much more disciplined. The smaller players left. And this is favorable. But then when I look at GLN, what are the advantages we have and what are the opportunities we're trying to pursue. In terms of advantages, if you look at the GLN portfolio and Gerdau North America, 60% means beams and commercial structures, things that are -- that have better margins, that are good for experts, complex products. It's not any rolling mill that can produce beams, for instance, or structures. So we have to focus in these lines. And the second point, with the sale of the rebar mills, the mill not only became a one-stop shop to expand sanctions and cover the whole range of products, but we can produce rebars in almost all the plants we have in North America. In the lower demand period, I can keep my assets, operational reduced fixed costs. It's advantage I didn't use to have and many of our peers do not have that advantage. So the strategy looking forward is vertical integration. It makes sense. I spoke about scrap and we're getting into downstream. We have to select opportunities. We won't have a conflicting channel with our customers. We have to ensure market share and create more value and margin for our customers, always maintaining our market share of primary products, but we also diversified in the market. We used to realize 70%, 75% on distribution. Now it's down to 50%. We can get into construction, into manufacturing, capturing things I didn't have before, data centers and warehouses and all of that. So with distribution, we only kept the market we already had. Now with these resources, we can look for opportunities. We can capture these opportunities, seize these opportunities as they come up. So it's not just operating efficiency. It's about commercial strategy that has been successful as well, and getting to the end, I have no doubt that in the steel industry, cost is essential. If you don't have the right cost, you add up gain. So in the next 5 years, we'll focus on what we lost, human resources, everyone did in the steel industry. We will reinforce that. We'll use Brazil as arbitrage, we'll bring technical people, we'll engage our employees in the short fall with safety, with CapEx, with process control. So we are very motivated to enjoy the fame we had of being best operators with process control. This is a long journey, a challenging one, but I can assure you we are firm in our purpose to have a structure that will be not only equal, but a cost structure below that of our competitors.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#17

I want to stress the point, the biggest benefit -- the biggest benefit was that we cannot waste utilization. If utilization is under 80%, fixed cost dilution impacts the profitability. What Wang mentioned, rebar and filler, we got out of rebar. We sold the business to commercial to a company, and we can produce 500,000 tonnes of rebar if there is a momentaneous need. If production of other products drops, we can start with rebar and we can compete with this rebar in North America to maintain our utilization ratio. If we maintain that, we are already taking a stride forward to pursue a higher competitiveness, kind of what we did in Brazil. We have been operating with our mills, but on [indiscernible] maintaining the tradition of philosophy of a mini mill that worked. But if we don't maintain the utilization rate at 80%, we'll no longer be competitive. So that's an important point that we're changing. We'll have to use the flexibility that we have, the fact that we have several mills spread in Brazil and North America to make these moves more and more to ensure we'll have a utilization rate that will be constant despite market demand variations. That's a key point that we've addressed in the recent years and we'll continue to do so in the future.

Daniel Sasson

analyst
#18

Daniel Sasson with Itau BBA. I think that Wang was under pressure. Japur is very much at ease. So Japur, this goes to you. Gustavo mentioned the importance of the mining project to turn Ouro Branco into a premium product cluster hub. So perhaps if you could speak about the potential EBITDA that you mentioned, BRL 2.7 billion in total, BRL 1.1 billion will come from mining. So perhaps you could break it down, what is incremental EBITDA versus the current levels? And what is avoided cost? Are you not needing to buy ore from third parties or pellets? So that would be good. That's number one. The second question, Japur is, a part of the financial policies of Gerdau; for example, gross debt at a maximum of BRL 12 billion always conceived? In 2018, when Gerdau was half the size it is, EBITDA was BRL 6.5 billion. Do you think that there is room perhaps to revisit some of these policies, perhaps having the higher maximum indebtedness or higher than 30% dividend payout? How are you thinking about this -- about these main pillars that walk hand in hand with our strategy of returning remuneration to shareholders, share buyback, [indiscernible]. You consider buying back our shares as an excellent investment. How are you thinking about policies of the company?

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#19

Before Japur answers that, let me make a brief introduction connecting with what Wang mentioned. The production of flat steel in the U.S. is migrating from leaving blast furnaces to electric ovens. With electric furnaces, we have the need of a low residual. So we have to look for prime scrap. We have to perhaps use big iron or DRI. So this has increased the price of prime scrap in the U.S., but we do need that in our steel making production in the U.S. So going back to Caio's question, this brings up a very important opportunity for us. Here in Brazil, you're not going to have a reduction. When we look, we don't see a reduction in integrated capacity. There's a very significant point, however, that is happening. The ability to supply iron ore in Minas Gerais, the iron quadruple, that was very rich in hematite. If you walk in those hills, you would just put your hand on the ground and you could get hematite. And this ended over time, and that's why we lost competitiveness to produce mills of Divinopolis and [indiscernible]. It was very easy to buy this ore. It was easy. It's no longer easy. With the dam accident in Minas Gerais, that created an additional complexity. To get a license for a mining project today, it's a complex business. There's a lot of scrutiny, details involved. With my taxpayer number every month, I access the system to get approval of the operational quality of our dams. That's now an assignment for CEOs of companies. So complexities were created. I'm not saying this is good or bad, but this happened after the accident. So once there will be no production capacity reduction in Brazil via blast furnaces, access to low cost or access and availability of volume becomes very strategic. You're in the market, you know everyone. So that's a point that you can assess individually. But to us, if we don't have this ore at a volume, cost and availability required, we would find it hard to compete in the long term. The Miguel Burnier is an excellent mining asset in the long run. When we talk about 40 years of supply, it doesn't mean that the mine will be depleted after 40 years. We're talking about certified reserves. So there is a stamp from certifying bodies saying, I evaluate it, I probed it and there is ensured ore for the next 40 years, which brings the safety in the return of the project. Beyond the 40 years, what we'll do in the coming years is to continue to certify the mine to say, perhaps it will supply for 50, 60, 100 years. We'll continue to check the potential at the Miguel Burnier mine, close to Ouro Branco. In the coming years, we'll update this as we have this stamp of the reserves. So this is an abstract competitive edge for us because the ore is there. It's sitting 13 kilometers away from Ouro Branco. I wanted to say this because understanding what's happening in Minas Gerais is key. It's very important to show you our future competitiveness, investments we can make and still making in Ouro Branco when we have this ore available for decades. Japur over to you.

Rafael Japur

executive
#20

Daniel, connecting with what Gustavo has just mentioned about our long-term perspective for these assets in Minas Gerais. When we think about this specific investment in mining, if we were to think about this as an individual separate company, I could clearly talk about the EBITDA because I'm talking about production, value with production cost with a market price. . But to us, this is not merely individual growth as a joint venture -- a separate joint venture or a separate spin-off. Because to Gustavo's point, our situation today is very different when we think about access to rich material from [indiscernible], which enables us among other things to have competitive or at low cost. And we get a little bit more technical, but the proportion of our load in the blast furnace, how many pellets we have to use in the blast furnace. It's a fraction. Typically, a blast furnace would require, if we get a company in Europe and Asia, between 30%, 40% outlet load. We use a fraction of that given the ore that we have today. But as Gustavo eloquently explained here, this is not a reality for the next 40 years. We cannot manage a capital-intensive company with a long-term outlook thinking just about the next 2 to 3 years. We have to think about a much longer-term solution. When we think about this capital to be generated by this mining project, it has a growth component, yes. But in the long term, when we think about [indiscernible] in the region, perhaps the need to supplement the [indiscernible] ore with a higher load of pellets, we are complementing this with investments in cold agglomeration that we're making. So 10, 15, 20 years in the future, this is going to be a cost avoidance because naturally, both us and the other companies in the iron quadruple will have to rely more on using pellets to complement to load. So there's no simple asset to say what percentage is cost avoidance and how much is growth? It really depends on the time horizon we are considering. Do you want to add to that Gustavo?

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#21

Sure. This mine is going to produce 5.5 million tonnes. You might be asking, can you make 10? Technically, yes. I can't believe is that we should produce ore for our own consumption. Can we become an iron ore player in the future with this mine? Yes, it's not a business -- believe, our business better at this point. And I don't intend to change this relief until the mine is operational, and we are producing 5.5 million tonnes and that we are sure that our processes are robust. So the question is, can we produce more? Yes. This is in our short-term plan? No. When are we going to start thinking about this? Perhaps, in the beginning of 2026.

Rafael Japur

executive
#22

Okay. To your second question, Daniel, about our financial policy. Well, though it is something we wonder every now and then, we discussed the financial policy when the dollar was BRL 3.50 or BRL 3.70. Now, the dollar price is BRL 5.40. I haven't looked today, but it's definitely different. So of course, this is something that we can revisit. But we have to remind you that we are a cyclical industry. It's very easy for us to get used to the good stuff. When you get a car, I had a manual shift of speed. And then I bought a car with an electric transmission. We got used to that. So it's really easy to get used to the high profitability, but it's easy, but very dangerous in the cyclical industry like ours that is very capital intensive. So yes, it is something that we may revisit our financial policy terms. But, right, Gustavo, we are not thinking about any radical change regarding our level of capitalization or something of that sort.

Rafael Barcellos

analyst
#23

I'm Rafael Barcellos with Bradesco BBI. Congratulations on the event. First, regarding CapEx, you showed numbers that are not so new, but you gave us an update. So we can see that after 2026, there will be a significant decline. So I just want to confirm that if this is really so and what can make this number change looking forward? Also, I'd like to confirm whether in these figures, you are including the new wave outlay of cash. And regarding Mexico, what about the studies? How are they unfolding? So I guess that I'd like to know more about the CapEx? And perhaps, [indiscernible], when you look at Gerdau today, products, departments, divisions. What product or BD makes less sense for Gerdau to invest in. And if there is any discussion about divesting a specific part of the company?

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#24

Well, since I started talking before, you start now and I'll complement.

Rafael Japur

executive
#25

Rafael, to be objective, these investments are only CapEx for our core business that does not include investments in our subsidiaries or investments in Newave or in other in joint ventures or other investments by Gerdau next. We are talking strictly about our strategic CapEx, investing in our core business. The second question about Mexico. We continue to evaluate that investment? I think you are all following the geopolitical changes with the elections in Mexico, with the changes in the judiciary system. We have the President taking over and the promises that the new President made in terms of reforms, that worried regulatory agencies. So we continue to evaluate the economic merit of the project. We have the upcoming U.S. presidential elections that might have some repercussions regarding that investment. We are still following this, monitoring, and by year-end, we should communicate the market how we are progressing in that regard. Now to your first question, regarding CapEx, about the curve that shows a decline in 2026 to 2027. You have to remember that in our earnings conference call of Q1, Gustavo highlighted, given the whole work that we are doing of predictive engineering, digital twins, and assessments we have been doing with peer reviews regarding the level of utilization and health of our equipment at Ouro Branco, we postponed the maintenance stoppage that we would have in Ouro Banco. It would happen in 2025, and we postponed to 2027. So we understand that even if we have a reduction in our level of strategic CapEx in 2027, you should remember that we are going to have an important challenge and important commitment to our blast furnace at Ouro Branco.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#26

Now let me add that. In my point of view, we cannot have a greater or higher CapEx than what we've been doing. About BRL 5 billion CapEx, that's a maximum ceiling we can do, not only in terms of the capacity of our balance sheet, but also capacity to execute. Any greater CapEx will bring an exponential deterioration in our ability to do things well, given lack of engineering resources, like partners in Brazil. So that's the upper limit of what we can do, and we'll stick to that limit. In terms of these BRL 5.5 billion, the part that goes to maintenance and to care for the health of our assets, we believe that we need to continue to invest and that we have to keep the asset healthy. But we have our wishes and dreams to continue to invest, to grow in some segments that we believe can create value in the long run for us. Of course, if we have very complex world scenarios, we might postpone part of these streams. But if the business context remains as is, if we continue to deliver the current results, in the next few years, we will realize some of these streams. When you ask, what is not worth investing in? I think the production of rebars in Brazil, there are sufficient assets. To many people manufacturing rebars, some consolidation will happen over time. When and by whom, we don't know, but this will happen for rebar. It doesn't make sense for us to invest in rebar unless it is an absolutely transformational investment to produce rebar at a lower cost and higher competitiveness. On the other hand, we'll look at the options we have now at Ouro Branco now that we're investing in hot-rolled coils and in mining. That gives us other options at Ouro Branco. We can grow the production of flat steel. So that's what we're dreaming about. We understand that with the current configuration of the company, we can grow and we can address markets where we are not present. All those markets where we are present, but they see a lack of capacity. So when we look at the geographies, we are happy with what we have now. We have no plans to divest, to exit a country. Actually, we realized our wish in terms of digital. This was a long journey. We understand where we are positioned looking at the short to midterm, we are okay. And in Mexico, we are far from making a final decision. It's not a simple decision in terms of the stand-alone business in Mexico of accessing energy, water, logistics, safety and not just legal assurance there. And in Brazil, we have to see the small changes that Claudia will implement compared to Lopez Obrador where we have the ability to supply Mexico via the U.S. and Brazil that Japur showed you. We're going to take it easy in making this kind of decision. We are far from making a final decision. We continue to move ahead intensely in the studies and in the analysis that will allow us to at the right timing, say yes or no, but in a way that will be understandable for everyone, and when we say that we expect to have a decision by December, it is because there are some engineering studies that are ongoing. If we believe that in terms of the geopolitics and in terms of the business, the decision is not mature, we can postpone it. And so we think it's the right moment.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#27

Thank you for your presentation. I'm [ Caio ] from UBS. I have 2 questions. They are just a follow-up of the previous questions and Werneck even gave me a partial answer. But now going back to CapEx versus shareholder remuneration and thinking about the long-term strategy of the company. It's interesting to look at the chart you showed where you depicted the strategic processes. It was BRL 12 billion and a lot of it has been concluded. You added just a few things, but we are getting close to BRL 9 billion. . I think we are asking ourselves, especially when we look at the drop in CapEx going forward, I mean how much it will be come 2025 and '26? When do you think we will see the rollout of that package or the renewal of the package? So when it comes to 2026, there will be another BRL 12 billion of strategic CapEx. Can we think about Gerdau in the next 5 or even 10 years of a company that, given its financial health, it will continue to post CapEx around that same level of BRL 5 billion to BRL 6 billion, a company that will split its investments between shareholders' remuneration and strategic investments or maybe the company will focus on having a dividend policy on the table and prioritize shareholder payout? So I just want to hear your comments because Werneck already started on that line. Last time we talked, last September, we talked about possibilities and the "delay" of this demand related to the new users of steel in the U.S. We see the investment is coming and we also noticed that these plants are moving well on the U.S. side. But at the same time, there is an opposite indicator because the margin of the peers in the U.S. are being reduced. So this next quarter, we will see the margins of the U.S. division very close to a level that you mentioned to be in the mid-teens for the long run. So most likely, we reached that level now. So thinking about the mid- and long-term margin, do you believe that we will now see more adequate margins for the sector? All of that idea of thinking about a stronger demand in the infrastructure sector, in civil construction, that would probably increase margins, and they will linger for longer or you see some obstacles along the way? Or if you still see the long-term margin around the mid-teens? I know that, that was a very long question.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#28

So I'll start, and then my colleagues can add. I've been in this present position for the past 7 years. I don't have a financial background. My background is operations and engineering. Since day 1, among the questions I ask myself very often, and one thing that I insisted in doing is improving my listening capacity. And you have been contributing enormously to my point of view and helping me to make the decisions that need to be made. So the slides that Japur showed about CapEx and what we want to do reflects what you told us. And I know that many of you are laughing because you help me to give me that vision that we didn't have at Gerdau. I would love to continue talking to you because everything you say, I'm always telling my team that you have to look at what you say very carefully and give them a response. Since I don't have a financial background, I usually talk to people who have that uncontrollable desire to have a stop doing CapEx and just return back to shareholders. And then I look at the CapEx and long-term shareholders of ours have that uncontrollable desire for us to keep pursuing good projects and projects that can allow us to generate long-term value. And you are more knowledgeable about the market and myself. There are many shareholders that in the long run, want to see us generating creating more value. So sometimes, I ask myself, how can I please everybody? And what I've been doing and Japur can add, I've been trying to pursue a balance. I can't just stop CapEx, doing CapEx of projects that can deliver good things in the long run. I have to give visibility to these projects to you. I cannot afford not to come here, as we did today, to say what is the additional EBITDA that you will generate in the long run? I mean you can't be demanding. And I know that we can do better. But there has to be a balance because if you understand that they are good projects in the next 5 years, 10 years, so that we can come here and say, okay, it pays out for us, not to return dividends or short-term returns because in the long run, there are good projects. We just have to strike a balance. But listening to you, I'll try to strike that balance. I mean we talk about that every day. So Japur, over to you.

Rafael Japur

executive
#29

[ Caio ], I think that's it. I mean sometimes we ask yourselves, maybe in 5 or 6 years, there will be another BRL 9 billion, I hope so. Because that means that we have good projects and the markets that we chose to compete are the right markets and the steel milling sector and the steel producing sector will continue to create value. And it pays off to invest because the return from these projects is much better than just keeping the money in the bank. We were fortunate enough in the past years because we focused on our discipline and not leveraging our P&L, which is resilient. And because of that, we are paying out more dividends than what we paid in the past. But at the same time, we keep an eye in the long run. And in all of the maintenance that needs to be done in our critical assets to maintain our competitive, not for the next 2, 3 years, for the next 100 years. Of course, we are not going to do anything crazy in terms of capital allocation, both in terms of CapEx and dividend. And again, as Gustavo said, we really thank you for your inputs because if we stop to think about it, until 2021 and '22, Gerdau had never bought back shares for other reasons. Just to fund, we did it -- just to fund long-term projects, but now we are doing that just to create more value to shareholders. And this came from our discussions with you and the fact that we are listening to what you're saying. We understand that this is our North. This is our best view. And as Gustavo was saying, we had to share that with you. And as we have more visibility and as we make advances, we will continue to disclose things to you, but I would like to highlight something important. When we look back 2019 up to now, I mean after 2020, the cycle was stronger. But from the fourth quarter of 2019 until now, Gerdau paid out to its shareholders through dividends or buyback, more than 60% of free cash flow generation. So we distributed 25% more to the shareholders than what we invested in CapEx or productivity. This clearly demonstrates that we are not taking advantage of these moments of good profit generation, but we are just looking at the long run and the sound in resilient moments. Wang, now over to you.

Chia Wang

executive
#30

That's a very good question. It's very difficult for you to make up long, long-term projection. But if we look at 2 or 3 years, what is happening in the U.S. today, we know that this is election year. And this -- by the mere fact that it is an election, all large projects are put on hold, and this is very natural. It happens in every election cycle. But at the same time, I think the Fed is already pivoting. It is reducing interest rates and this can generate a good drive going forward. But I emphasize that the demand is weak compared to recent past. But the 3 fronts, manufacturing reshoring will continue. Renewable energy is a trend. It's here to stay. Maybe it will move faster with Kamala and slower with Trump, but in terms of infrastructure, I have mixed feelings. I mean I'm happy, but it could be better because this will help our results. But on the other hand, I think it's been put on hold. And I think this could help us if necessary. So certainly, the years of '25, '26 and '27, there will be the most intense years of infrastructure in the U.S. It's not a matter of approvals, because you can no longer delay things because the needs are here, and things will have to be done. So I know we are sad, but look at all of the recent events with the hurricanes which happened in North Carolina and what happened in Florida recently. I mean Florida lost $105 billion. Imagine everything that we have to be rebuilt, homes, highways, et cetera. I think that we are at a low level, but in the next 2, 3 quarters, we will face challenges. But going forward, things will certainly rebound. What I can say is from my conversations with clients, everything is being put on hold because it's an election year, but there is nothing that indicates that things are bad. When I look at my backlog, even though it's lower, it is still at healthy levels, and it's been very constant in the past few months. And if you look at Resolution 232, things will continue. And imports even though they were higher, it has reached levels equal to that prior to the pandemic. So if you look throughout the cycle, things are quite healthy. And we have hybrid mills, our product lines are more profitable. We know where to seek for good opportunities to capitalize. And moreover, we are focusing on costs. I'm confident that we will reach a very strong level.

Rodolfo De Angele

analyst
#31

I'm Rodolfo from JPMorgan. I have 3 questions. Okay. Well, it's up to you. You decide who will answer. My first question is still on CapEx. I think one of the takeaways for me is, okay, we are preparing for an environment of fierce competition with China. So I know that you were looking for other opportunities. But with CapEx, is there anything that we could think of, especially in terms of maintenance of using technology, being creative so that this level of maintenance CapEx, in particular, there might be other opportunities for further reductions. So that was my first question. And the second question, we briefly talked about heavy plates. Even plants or even facilities are being shut down. What is the possibility of making the business more profitable? What could be done with heavy plates? And the third question, Werneck, when you're talking about digital solutions, you said, well, if you digitalize everything, I don't know if I understood you correctly, but maybe here, you said we could have an opportunity for 20% more EBITDA. Could you elaborate more on that number? Because it sounded like large.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#32

The first aspect of CapEx is that there are 2 avenues here in terms of opportunities. First, Rodolfo, when you compare our current CapEx with the CapEx prior to the pandemic, it's 40% more expensive. So all this CapEx here, if we were to do it before the pandemic, it would cost 40% less. This referred to inflation of equipment services and labor. We are constantly looking for alternatives to make CapEx cheaper. I mean if you look at the time prior to the pandemic, there are opportunities. We're doing lots of things. Today, we are working with a civil construction company for a certain project. So we engage with that company during the basic engineering phase. So once you engage with the company, you get greater efficiencies with the design. So we opened the entire project and we check all the quantities because we don't want to be surprised down the road. We are engaging in partnerships much earlier than before. So one day, we have a cheaper CapEx. In terms of maintenance CapEx, there are opportunities, whatever you look instead of stopping or shutting down a plant just to change a component today through digital projects. I know beforehand that if I do not change that component or if there is a failure, I'm prepared to do that operation in another mill. So there are many opportunities, and I connect that to that 40%. So what do we do? This thing about digital transformation is cumbersome. I mean we had to struggle for 2 years because we thought we understood it, but we didn't. Because if you do not have some prerequisites to promote that digital transformation, it won't happen. I mean that involves collaboration. Sometimes companies put things under the rug, companies sometimes do not have a good organizational structure. They are not focused on modern technologies like [ Squad ]. Things won't work. So for 2 years, we had to understand how to do that. So we had to gather efforts from all over the place. We had a very, very detailed road map, and we worked on that for 2 years. And we check all of our major inefficiencies. It doesn't mean that we are not operating well, but it means that if we could be state-of-the-art in everything we did, if nothing would go wrong, how much more results could we deliver. So we look at the major opportunities, let's say, for example, the industrial area. That's almost everything for us. If we want to have an efficiency level where nothing stops. Then, all the runs work properly in the melt shop. Then we look at all of the aspects. So supply chain, put the product, load the truck, unload the truck, buy coal, buy ore. We are the largest cargo shipper in Brazil today. So we look at customer service, supply chain and 4.0 industry. I'm not even focusing on the reduction of the phone bill. This is not included. But, way back then with Falconi, this is called GAAP. I mean I think everybody read the book. I mean a GAAP is an opportunity waiting to be captured. So 20% more EBITDA. The companies -- not only us, other companies could be delivering. So it's there. The issue is how much of that GAAP can be captured every year. And for us, it became a matter of survival, because you could run [indiscernible] and Six Sigma, that wouldn't pay off because we've been doing that for years. And then we only get an extra dollar per tonne, and there comes China. So what we've been doing in the past 2 years is something quite unique. We've never done that before. In a very structured way, we are promoting a digital transformation that will allow us to go after these opportunities. So for us from now on, what we call a digital twin. This will be our life. It's a simulation with algorithm and AI that can predict how my equipment will behave knowing the characteristics of the ore that is coming, the charcoal that is coming from Australia, once I mix everything what changes in the blast furnace. And how can I set up my equipment to avoid future problems. This is what we are looking for any industrial company that you talk to, will have a gap like that. The game will be one those that will be more capable of capturing all of the opportunities. This is a game for us. That's why we are diligently seeking for the necessary conditions to get every -- so that things happen accordingly. In general, this is -- it's a huge opportunity. I think maybe a few years from now, you could say you could ask whether we failed or we succeeded in pursuing that opportunity. I mean it's there. It's real. Okay? That's it for the -- did I miss anything? Heavy plates. We invested in hot rolled coils and hard rolling, we were very successful, these 250,000 tonnes. When they start, they will be sold to our customers. It's not a market we have to pursue the heavy plates. We sailed a good moment when we got into that because the heavy plate rolling mill. If you look at the whole southern hemisphere, we have the best rolling mill hours. We had this moment when the wind power in the stream. The whole body of an aero generator of [ Gerdau ] foundation. It all requires heavy plates and we quickly acquired a high market share. The renewable energy resource basically not solar power. Wind power is not that much of a [ fab ] right now, so the market kind of dropped a little. And we're looking out for other alternatives. We believe that some of the naval industry will come back to Brazil. Now in North America, for example, there's an abstract need of the Department of Defense at the U.S. to rebuild destroyers, submarines. The U.S. Naval industry accounts for less than 1% of the world naval industry. Brazil has to republish platforms, equipment, there is no naval industry available in the world. So we'll need to have a naval industry. I have the right conditions for this to happen. So we have to seek smaller markets like this one. But if we put it all together, you can revise our business. But it was a difficult moment for us this year. So the heavy plate segment give us some suffering. In the midterm, we believe that it will either, but there is no magical solution. It's a little bit of the naval industry, machinery and equipment, imported equipment. Now we are a little more competitive, so that we can manufacture this in Brazil. So it will be a set of smaller markets that can bring us to the level of deliveries that we had when the wind power industry was more overheated. So we have a challenge of pursuing these markets. It is an extraordinary product. Like I said, in terms of quality, it is unbeatable. It's just about the market because in terms of technology and quality, it is undebatable, undeniable.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#33

[Interpreted] I'm [indiscernible] I have two questions. The first is kind of related to provocation made by Varnick when you were talking about cutting fixed costs. I don't know if I had the right perception. I think that there's a process to be mature. We're starting to see the results of cutting costs. But according to the message, you said it seems that there is more room that you're studying or evaluating new initiatives, new plans. Can you share this with us? Or perhaps in the current plan, you're planning to get even more fixed costs than initially planned? So that's kind of my question. My second question was about the reassessment of strategic projects. I thought it was interesting to see that you were able to change somethings. There is a lot of scrutiny in the approval of these projects. So could we see a similar movement of reevaluating, revisiting the projects that have not been completed yet? Can we see new things being included in the strategic CapEx? In the Gerdau Day next year, there might be a small project with an interesting ROI, what will prepare the company for a structural change in the industry? Well, these are my questions.

Rafael Japur

executive
#34

[Interpreted] So to quickly answer your two questions. We understand that cutting costs -- working to cut down costs and increasing productivities just like cutting your nails. We have to look at this, you have to look at your hand, look at your nails and trim your nails. Look at what you're doing to be more productive and more efficient. So... If [indiscernible] and where that is not politically correct. But if it's not an obsession to pursue efficiency, productivity and performance, we wouldn't be here for the next 120 years. We do believe that there is some extra room to increase efficiency. It really depends if the market continues to perform well, we might reduce fixed costs even further. We might have a cost performance level even better than initially perceived. But every now and then we get this question, but we are not anticipating any other type of hibernation of any one of our units in any of our operations.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#35

[Interpreted] Now talking about your second question about CapEx, it is exactly that. We want to maintain this dialogue, this open conversation with you. whenever we think it's timely to revisit that slight bed flow includes some things, remove the projects that are complete. We'll do this. We'll revisit this and share this with you organically and transparently. We have a certain level of scrutiny. The way -- we approve our investments at our budget. At Gerdau, there is the right moment to do it in the right way to do it. So it's not something that we do as frequently. We don't frequently completely review. It's very hard the next year, we'll come and tell you that there was a radical change in the slide. But our way of managing and running the businesses were looking at organic incremental things, things that leave a portfolio, projects which are completed and it is our role to help us and to pressure us to deliver these projects and we include things.

Rafael Japur

executive
#36

[Interpreted] As Gustavo mentioned. As we find projects that will have the right return and create value in the long run for our shareholders. To give you an example, just not to miss the opportunity. In our initiatives to reduce reliable and fixed costs, we have at least 1,000 lines, more than 1,000 -- at least 1,000 initiatives in the current [ system ]. Which is very big things. If we compare the Brazilian BD with the North America BD. Great opportunity is the price of natural gas in operations with line we pay on average $4 per million of BTU of natural gas in Brazil, $16. There are debates that you follow, decrease for natural gas, if there will be less reinjection in presold platforms. It's all transformational for us in terms of competitiveness. So there's the issue of the free market that will bring competitiveness in the distribution, but the molecule, the gas price needs to be resolved. There is a need with the reindustrialization of Brazil to have natural gas, 12 times difference in Wind mills with Brazilian mills. In electricity, same thing. It's another fixed cost and also the personnel cost. When we compare the U.S. units with the Brazilian ones, those people who are in the shop, same number of people who have in middle [indiscernible] Texas is the same number we have here. But when we compare the people were not directly related to steel making, the difference is huge. Surveillance. We know the problem of security in Brazil. We have 30x more security guards here than in North America, and it goes on and on. So these gaps are very well identified and we have to pursue these opportunities. We have 250,000 hectares of forests. The security is done with drones and drones fly over the forest, not just for security. To give you an example, we have predictions of wild buyers in the forests. We know with a 90% precision level in what part of our forests St. Três Marias for example, we have a higher risk of wildfires. So we move a fire brigade there. We have drones flying over the forest, all the time, covering images to see if there's offense broken or a car that was not supposed to be there -- parked there. So we have small opportunities, but if you add them all up, they will give us a variable and fixed cost level as never before. We need that. There's no other way of competing.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#37

[Interpreted] We have federal government decisions regarding natural gas, electricity, the free market. If I look these decisions come through, there will be transformational, not just for us in the steel industry, but for the industry as a whole, we're continuously looking about. I answered [ last ] question about 80% utilization. We believe that the amount of mills we have, the way we are operating, it's all fine. But we still believe that we transport, we carry a lot of material. We travel more kilometers with the materials we produce. So there's also optimization -- potential optimization team, product ex for market. Why? I won't manufacture it in the Northeast. I'll start manufacturing in Rio or cabotage. We can use more cabotage with a lower sea transport cost. Can use more cabotage. The company is in Gerdau Next, from G2L to Avanti, the company that we have in association with [ Rand ]. So it's like I said, the 1,000 opportunities. We have to be disciplined, pursue each and every line, cascade it down to the whole organization, who's going to do what? When? When you talk recipe people who do more get paid better. So we are totally a meritocratic company with a level of basic remuneration or compensation that will be very competitive, always rewarding those people who can deliver more. Every day, every night, we think about that.

Chia Wang

executive
#38

[Interpreted] And I would like to add a very important point. We talked about CO2 emissions. We emit less than half of the industry. If we focus on North America, our emissions are 0.432 tonnes. CO2 equivalent per tonne of steel produced, one of the lowest in the world. And I believe not in the short term, but in the mid-to-long term, there will be a carbon tax policy. This is already happening, melting point made in America. If this happens, and I believe it will, we are privileged in our positioning. We have the lowest emissions. This can change totally the dynamic of the industries involved in the U.S. and Canada will not be different.

Unknown Analyst

analyst
#39

[Interpreted] I want to talk about longs. People already talked about the premium aspect and flat steels. So now speaking about long steel, we know that there are negotiations ongoing with the builders. But looking at the market on the demand side, we could exploit demand mainly because of the My House My Life program Minha -- Casa Minha Vida program. But at least in our understanding, the level of execution is not as high as expected, especially in this and administration. Now looking at the interest rate cycle that is going up again now, this may also affect demand on the construction for mid- and high-income. So looking at MCMV projects in high-income projects, my question is about your dealings with the builders. Do you think that it's not as intense as you would like? And in terms of longs, is still low, it was negative for quite some time. The mills feel the need to transfer? But on the other hand, demand is not so heated. I know the readjustment is a very sensitive subject. You don't really mention the members to the market. But if you could talk about the quality part, that would be nice. And the second part of my question is related to the BQ2 project in Ouro Branco, the 250,000 tonnes a year. What kind of ramp up do you think that you will reach? And how long it would take until we see the full capacity of the project?

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#40

[Interpreted] Well, the flat market is also going through some difficulties at the time. It for me to reach the utilization rate, I don't know whether you think -- you were thinking about a lower capacity at the beginning. In terms of hot roll coiled, much of that comes from commercial Gerdau and long-term customers we have because they use hot-rolled coil in parallel with other products. So that's a full mix of customers. And when they engage in a negotiation with Gerdau, prefer a complete mix because they get better commercial conditions. These are customers that it wouldn't make sense for them to go to the market only for hot-rolled coil. So for us, we see the need to start producing it very quickly. We think that 5 months would be our estimate for ramp-up, so that we could produce that 250,000. Because the bulk of the investment is already in place. So the difficulties we would have in terms of automation and furnace, this is already in place. So it will be just the process. So the fine-tuning, I mean, if you were a complete project, it's not present in this project. Therefore, we believe that 5 months by the end of next May, we will be able to produce in full those 250,000 tonnes. And longs, we are talking about 30% of shipments. The longs market is very, I would say, I wouldn't say complex, but it has its own uniqueness. When there is a new imported product, I mean, longs not so much as hot-rolled coils. I was asking whether we should have additional ICMs. But when we have longs coming in, it is more earmarked for distribution. Because the level of industrialization of builders to bring is large. Well, MCMV, it's a lighter construction. But at the same time, it industrialized, construction. So Brazil does not import the screen, and that requires a lower volume of steel. And the constructions that you named it as being for mid- and high-income, the service level that it requires. It's very hard for other companies to compete with us. Because to concrete every floor, every bar or rebar is identified. It's like a LEGO game. You don't have the iron bender right at the worksite, but they put together all those steel parts overnight to help concreting pavement. So you go to a construction site one day, the next day, there is another pavement already built. What we see today when we look at our KPIs that allow us to anticipate some suggestions. For instance, today, we have some apps that allow us to look at the number of permits giving to new construction sites. This is an anticipating indicator that tells us about the level of construction. And the other indicator is the level of orders for our cut and bend operation. So we are at a different level when you look at the request for permits and the volume of work sites. Therefore, right now, we don't see this sector stopping anytime soon. And this macroeconomic aspects have always been significant. Because the search for competitiveness of builders is very high, too. I mean there were some improvements now compared to the past, especially with MCMV. When clients have a healthier status, somehow they are trying now to regain profitability and negotiations for this type of segment. Builders are not seeking a short-term gains. Some of our clients have been around for 40, 50 years. So we know that if we want to get gains -- immediate gains now, there will be an impact further down the line. But in fact, right now, we see the need for the steel industry to regain profitability. We are on a journey to recover a bit of their profitability because it is off balance. We see a market that is highly demanding. There is also the import aspect, but we are not at the profitable level that we wanted to be. It is being revisited. And what we will see in the next quarters is that our Brazil BD will deliver better results when compared to what we were delivering right now for reasons that you already mentioned. Well, thank you. We will now conclude the Q&A. I would just like Gustavo to remain here with us, because now we will deliver the APIMEC seal. For that, I would like to call Ricardo Martins, the Executive President of [ APIMEC ]. Can you please enlarge the slide... How many years? 20 years of partnership with APIMEC. This is a long-lasting partnership, really nice. They've been very supportive to our investors.

Unknown Attendee

attendee
#41

[Interpreted] Hello, Gustavo. Well, if you allow me, I would like to say some reports about this relationship. I mean, next year, Gustavo and Marina, it will be 50 years since we started this partnership. And it started from this relationship. I mean, putting together this side with your side, with the side where analysts are, so their both sides could interact and look for the things that interested both parties. And APIMEC grew along the years, and it grew together with its counterparts because the focus was to strengthen the relationship through courses and events. Gerdau, I mean, have been with us as a partner for 29 years, and this is an example to be followed. I believe that they bring a lot more to us to help us prepare your reports. They -- they are a beacon in the market, showing where value resides. I would just like to urge you to answer the evaluation questionnaire because you can evaluate the information that you received. This questionnaire is very important to us, important to Gerdau, and important to the market. It gives Gerdau the opportunity to win our quality award. It justifies this in the investment -- not this investment today, but the quality of the information that they are conveying to us today. So please answer the questionnaire. Gustavo, I'm handing you the -- their frequency seal. This is an acknowledgment of this relationship. This just says so I'm part of this independent and open forum. And for those who want to be a shareholder or those that are currently a shareholder, this is a seal of excellence. Thank you, Gustavo, and thank you. Thanks to your entire team.

Gustavo Werneck

executive
#42

[Interpreted] On my behalf and on behalf of the entire Gerdau team, I thank you for this long-term partnership. Time flies. I mean we didn't have enough time to talk about a very crucial topic for me. So when you talk about this side and that side, the most important thing are the people. I had the opportunity to have here with me in the past few years. Now to receive this praise and I know that others will receive this also in the future. But I'll take this opportunity and say that maybe 90% of what we talked about here has to do with commodities. I mean the technology for the rolling mill you can buy, the process you can build, but really what makes the difference deep inside of the people. I mean, you may say that you have -- that you can work on 1,000 actions to make improvements. But if you don't have the right people, nothing will happen. In addition to making steel, Gerdau's also a place where we have a lot of good people. And I guarantee you that tomorrow, there will be somebody else taking my place that will be much better than me. So people management and people who really experience the Gerdau culture. And they are the ones who ensure our shareholders at this company will be around for another 100 years. So on behalf of those people, I would like to thank you for the partnership. And I would like to say again that on our part, we remain humble because we want to learn more and develop. And next year, we will certainly be better than today. Thank you very much. Thank you.

Mariana Dutra

executive
#43

[Interpreted] Thank you all very much. So on behalf of the Investor Relations team, I would like to thank you very much for joining us. And again, thank our CEO, Gustavo Werneck, Japur and Wang. I hope that this has been beneficial to all of you. And certainly, the IR team is always available to clarify any further issues. So with that, we conclude this event. Thank you all very much. [Portions of this transcript that are marked [Interpreted] were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]

Read the full transcript via the API

You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Gerdau S.A. transcript — plus 251,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.

Get the API View API docs →

This call discussed

For developers and AI pipelines

Programmatic access to Gerdau S.A. earnings transcripts and 251,000+ others is available through the EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments, full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.