Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO) Earnings Call Transcript & Summary
May 31, 2023
Earnings Call Speaker Segments
Operator
operatorThank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Great-West Lifeco conference call. [Operator Instructions] And the conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Paul Mahon, President and CEO of Great-West Lifeco. Please go ahead.
Paul Mahon
executiveThank you, Ariel, and good morning, everyone. Earlier today, we announced that Great-West Lifeco has entered into a definitive agreement to sell Putnam Investments to Franklin Templeton, one of the world's leading asset managers. This is an important transaction that is expected to create benefits for all parties. We appreciate you joining us on short notice to discuss this news and what it means for our company. With me on the call today is Garry MacNicholas, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Great-West Lifeco; also joining us for the Q&A is Raman Srivastava, Chief Investment Officer, Great-West Lifeco. Garry and I will deliver brief formal remarks, and then we'll be pleased to take your questions. Bob Reynolds will not be joining us as he's with his team in Boston today. Before we begin, I'd like to draw your attention to Slide 2 for our cautionary notes regarding forward-looking information and non-IFRS financial measures. These notes apply to today's discussion and presentation materials. Also, please note that all financial information throughout the presentation is in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Please turn to Slide 3. Great-West Lifeco has agreed to sell Putnam to Franklin Templeton, a leading asset manager with a broad range of investment and distribution capabilities. This combination is value-creating for our stakeholders. For Lifeco shareholders, it's financially attractive with potential transaction consideration and retained value of USD 1.7 billion to USD 1.8 billion. This aligns with our stated goal to unlock value through a combination that scales Putnam. For our Putnam team and customers, it will leverage and sustain Putnam's capabilities and strengths as part of a scale, diversified asset manager. In addition to the asset sale, Great-West Lifeco, Power Corporation of Canada and Franklin Templeton have entered into a strategic partnership. We look forward to leveraging Franklin Templeton's asset management strength in support of our wealth, retirement and insurance businesses across Lifeco. Beyond the transaction consideration and partnership benefits, Great-West Lifeco will retain its controlling interest in PanAgora Asset Management, a leading quantitative asset manager with USD 33 billion assets under management will realize the value of Putnam's seed capital and will retain certain tax benefits related to Putnam. Please turn to Slide 4. Putnam brings a lot to this transaction, strong investment performance and complementary capabilities to Franklin Templeton. With over 80% of mutual fund assets in 4-star and 5-star rated funds, Putnam's performance will help Franklin accelerate its growth, benefiting clients of both companies. The addition of Putnam's scale product and distribution capabilities will strengthen Franklin in a number of areas, including the retirement and defined contribution investment-only markets. I'm looking forward to seeing Putnam flourish as part of Franklin Templeton. With the combination delivering benefits for clients, teams and shareholders of both Great-West Lifeco and Franklin. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Garry to speak to the terms of the transaction and the components of value to be received by Great-West Lifeco. Garry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveThank you, Paul. Please turn to Slide 5. The overall transaction and retained value for Great-West Lifeco is estimated at over USD 1.7 billion and is expected to be moderately accretive to Lifeco EPS. There are a number of components to the value highlighted on the left-hand side of the page that I'll walk through. For the Putnam operations, excluding seed capital and subsidiary, PanAgora, Franklin will pay Great-West Lifeco upfront consideration comprised of cash of $100 million plus stock consideration of 33.3 million Franklin shares. We have estimated the share value at $850 million to $900 million based on recent share price performance. Today's price is a little lower than the average over the last couple of months, reflecting market pressures in recent weeks, but we are looking at the value over a longer time horizon. The majority of Putnam seed capital is also being acquired by Franklin for cash and a portion is being retained with a combined value of $220 million, although this will also fluctuate. Lifeco is retaining PanAgora, a leading quantitative asset manager with a value of $180 million. In addition, there is future contingent consideration of up to $375 million based on the strategic partnership. The $375 million contingent payments would be payable in cash and based on achieving certain milestones in the growth of the partnership over the next 3 to 5 years with the potential for catch-up payments based on growth out to year 7. EPS accretion is a result of the assumed incremental investment earnings on the stock and cash consideration, including Franklin common share dividends. The transaction is expected to be broadly neutral to book value depending on the value of Franklin shares and other adjustments at close. Closing is expected in the fourth quarter of 2023, subject to regulatory approvals and other customary conditions. Putnam employees own 12.2% of Putnam and Great-West Lifeco will purchase their shares at closing and also share any future contingent payments as and when received. Lifeco will have a 5-year lockup on a portion of its Franklin equity stake equal to 4.9% of total Franklin shares outstanding, representing approximately 26.2 million of the 33.3 million shares. We plan to hold the shares within Empower's insurance companies as part of the asset supporting their RBC regulatory capital ratio. The transaction is to be treated as an asset acquisition for U.S. tax purposes, which enables Lifeco to retain certain tax benefits with a value of approximately $345 million. I will now turn the call back over to Paul to provide additional context about how this transaction furthers Great-West Lifeco's growth strategy.
Paul Mahon
executiveThanks, Garry. Please turn to Slide 6. This transaction generates immediate value for Great-West Lifeco shareholders, including seed capital recovery, cash proceeds as well as participation in Franklin Templeton dividends and potential share price appreciation. It also allows us to increase our focus on building and extending leadership positions in the U.S. retirement and personal wealth markets through Empower. Further on in this presentation, we've included a slide profiling how we've built Empower into a leader in the U.S. retirement market, with 18 million plan participants and USD 1.4 trillion in assets under administration. We believe in the value of strong asset management and the sale of Putnam to Franklin Templeton is about scaling and strengthening Putnam for the benefit of stakeholders. We are confident that the combined Franklin-Putnam organization will also provide Lifeco and our affiliates with access to scaled and diversified asset management solutions that will further enhance our wealth, retirement and insurance offerings. We will also continue to build on Great-West Lifeco's strength in asset management through our diverse general account capabilities, our ownership of investment managers such as PanAgora, ILIM and Setanta and through our growing number of strategic partnerships that include Franklin Templeton, Mackenzie, Northleaf and Sagard. I will now ask you to turn to Slide 7 for more detail about the strategic partnership. We believe the strategic partnership between our companies will benefit our clients, distribution partners and shareholders. Franklin's diverse specialist investment managers are complementary to both Lifeco and Power affiliate capabilities, providing significant opportunity to cooperate on a global scale. As noted on the slide, Lifeco will provide an initial long-term asset allocation of USD 25 billion to Franklin's specialist investment managers within 12 months of closing. Beyond this, we expect additional AUM allocations over the next several years as we leverage Franklin's diverse and competitive asset management solutions across Lifeco platforms. While these allocations will benefit our companies and clients, they will also benefit our shareholders as growth in the partnership will drive the contingent consideration. Please turn to Slide 8. Franklin Templeton is a great fit for Putnam, is one of the world's leading investment managers with a strong presence in traditional and alternative investments, operating more than 30 countries under multiple recognizable brands. This business model will allow Boston-based Putnam team and their investment solutions to flourish as part of an at-scale organization. Importantly, Franklin like Putnam is a long-term-oriented investor with a client-centric culture and a strong track record of M&A execution and integration, including several recent high-profile acquisitions. Please turn to Slide 9. As I shared with you a few moments ago, we believe this transaction is a great key next step in Great-West Lifeco's U.S. growth strategy. This slide highlights the steps we've taken to reposition our U.S. business through multiple transactions supported by investments in technology and talent. Like the scale Franklin Templeton brings to unlock Putnam's strength, we believe the scale we've built at Empower provides us with a platform for growth. Not highlighted on this slide is the significant opportunity we see to provide technology-enabled personal wealth advice, products and services to Empower's 18 million participants. This will be an area of focus at an upcoming Investor Day we scheduled for June 20. Please turn to Slide 10. To conclude, we believe we found the right partner in Franklin Templeton. The strategic partnership enhances value creation opportunities for Great-West Lifeco shareholders and clients, while positioning Franklin to build upon Putnam's complementary capabilities. The transaction unlocks the value of Putnam while focusing Lifeco's U.S. business on building and extending its leadership position in retirement and wealth management markets. It allows Great-West Lifeco shareholders to benefit from equity participation in a large and scaled global asset management platform, and it establishes a strategic partnership between Great-West Lifeco, Power Corporation and Franklin Templeton which is expected to generate meaningful value for all parties well into the future. Finally, and importantly, before we get into Q&A, I would like to thank Bob Reynolds for his continued leadership over the past 16 years. I would also like to thank the entire Putnam team for their commitment to excellence for their clients. During his tenure, Bob built an exceptional team. Together, they revitalized Putnam through strong sustained investment performance, disciplined expense management and the development and delivery of competitive and relevant solutions for clients and their advisers. Ultimately, this laid the foundation for Putnam to come together with Franklin Templeton for its next phase of growth. And with that, we'll now open to questions, operator. Thank you.
Operator
operator[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Meny Grauman of Scotiabank.
Meny Grauman
analystJust to start -- just a few questions on the components of values you laid them out. Just to clarify, the line item that deals with estimated seed capital, is that just Franklin buying out that seed capital stake or those seed capital stakes? I'm just trying to understand that line specifically. First question.
Paul Mahon
executiveOkay, Garry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. The current value to the seed capital, Franklin is buying $165 million, and we are retaining $55 million. So it's $220 million which is the midpoint of that range. So that's what that line is getting at. And obviously, there can be other closing adjustments. So both the value and the closing will fluctuate at close.
Meny Grauman
analystGot it. And then for the contingent consideration, are you able to provide us a little more in terms of what is this tied to? Is it AUM growth? Anything else to kind of help scale what kind of upside the business needs to achieve before you get those payments?
Paul Mahon
executiveI'll start out by -- I'm going to let Garry maybe provide a bit more detail, but I'll start off by just providing some insight that we've spent a lot of time looking at Franklin's capabilities, trying to understand where they're complementary. We've noted their significant growth and strength in alternative asset management and we look to that and we see significant opportunity for Franklin to be a partner in terms of supporting our general account, our wealth management solutions. So we see a lot of opportunity in that transaction. Ultimately, the value of the contingent consideration is going to be based on growth in the partnership. And we're not going to provide more details on that specifically other than that there's various thresholds over time. So Garry, do you want to speak to that?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. I just -- I note -- there are -- the $375 million is divided into 3 payments in years 3, 4 and 5 of up to $125 million each, and then there's various catch-up mechanisms. And it's based on a revenue metric that is the growth in the partnership. That's the main metric.
Paul Mahon
executiveBut just to reiterate, we've done a lot of work to understand that, and we come into this with great confidence that we can drive strong revenue flow just because of the strengths and the complementary nature of their capabilities.
Meny Grauman
analystGot it. And then finally for me, just bigger picture, trying to understand from your perspective, the timing of this transaction, why you felt now was the right time. You highlighted valuations for asset managers, definitely are not at their peak right now. So why do this deal now?
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. Good question. Well, the reality is we've looked at a number of opportunities over time. And it's always come down to -- obviously, there's going to be the financial side of it, but there's going to be the fit side of it. And the reality is we take on Franklin's stock, the value to me is a bit secondary because if values are down now, ultimately, we believe values will grow and we'll be holding stock in an asset manager. The other point I'd make is it was critically important to us. We really think that Franklin is the best-fit partner that we've come across. We think it's good for the Putnam team. We think it's good for Putnam clients, and we think it's good for our overall company. So timing is one of those things. You can't select the time and the opportunities come when they come. But I think we are most focused on fit, and we're really excited about the fit of Putnam with Franklin and in the context of the partnership.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Paul Holden of CIBC.
Paul Holden
analystSimilar to Meny, I have a number of questions just to make sure I understand the transaction details correctly. And I guess, starting with the payment to employees, assuming they get 12.2% of gross proceeds as it comes in? And I guess, where I need clarity is just like what does that include? What does it not include? Like, I'm assuming that does not include any proceeds for seed capital. But is there anything else that would be excluded in terms of those payments to employees?
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry, over to you.
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. The employees get -- the 12.2% is for the -- for the -- actually the full Putnam. So that includes the seed capital. That's all part of Putnam. So I think there it's about -- what would that be somewhere in the $165 million range would be the 12.2%. So it is on the full value of Putnam. It does not include the tax benefits that are retained.
Paul Holden
analystGot it. Okay. And then in terms of the roughly 7 million of Putnam shares not under the lockup once the deal closed, can those be sold at any time? Or is there sort of a -- [ standing with these ] deals, typically, there might be a 60-, 90-day type lockup like a shorter lockup period?
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. Well, there's an initial lockup period of 180 days, after which we could. But ultimately, we'll make that decision when that time comes. As we said, we like the ownership stake in Franklin. And so we'll cross that bridge when that time comes.
Paul Holden
analystUnderstood. And then in terms of the cash proceeds, other than the payments that need to be made to employees. Is this going to be -- I don't know if there's a ton left over, is this mostly going to be about delevering similar to your current use of excess capital?
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry, over to you.
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes, yes. There's -- I'd point out a couple of things. One is that obviously, there is the cash and then there's the potential, depending on the shares in 6 months. But also I'd note that we are holding this under the U.S. insurance entities. The shares will be held there. They account for RBC capital. So that also frees up some potential RBC room. Now obviously, it's not liquid, but it is potential RBC room as well. And the use of the cash, yes, we certainly have a priority in the short term on continuing our deleveraging. And obviously, it could be deployed elsewhere as well beyond the deleveraging.
Paul Holden
analystOkay. And are you able to quantify that RBC benefit?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveIt's -- yes. I mean it is a fairly complex calculation because of the way RBC works. But I would imagine it'd be a few hundred million of capital generated on top of the -- we have some requirements for holding it and then the excess generated to be in that $300 million, $400 million in that sort of range.
Paul Holden
analystOkay. That's helpful. And then last one for me is just in terms of the $25 billion of long-term asset allocation to Franklin. Can you talk with any more specifics around what type of mandates, what the advisory fees might be on that? And I guess just really bigger picture, given the internal capabilities you have, why allocate $25 billion of assets to Franklin? What do they bring to the table that GWO can't manage internally?
Paul Mahon
executiveGood question. I'm going to -- I'll turn it to Raman to provide a bit more detail. But as part of the transaction, we looked at this from the standpoint of both the economics, the organizational fit and -- but also the partnership opportunity because there really are a number of complementary capabilities that we think augment the strength that we have internally. Raman, maybe you can provide a little bit of context.
Raman Srivastava
executiveYes, sure, Paul. And thanks for the question. So I'd say a couple of things. So one is, as you know, our U.S. business has grown significantly. And along with that, our assets have grown significantly, so the $25 billion principally will be -- a lot of it will be coming from the general accounts. And if you recall, our general account is high quality. It's mostly fixed income, investment-grade rate at 99%. So it's -- these assets, which are in scope, at least at first instance. And as Paul mentioned earlier, Franklin does provide a very broad platform for us to look at. They have capabilities in fixed income for sure, but they have capabilities in other areas which are complementary such as partially alternatives market. So we expect this to evolve over time. And initially, though, we think there's some path forward there in the general account.
Paul Holden
analystCongrats on getting this transaction across the line.
Paul Mahon
executiveThanks, Paul.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Gabriel Dechaine of National Bank Financial.
Gabriel Dechaine
analystWhat's the -- so the tax loss carryforwards that you're retaining, what's the duration of those?
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. The exact rate, I don't know the exact rate. I think we'd be using those up probably within the next 5 years or so.
Gabriel Dechaine
analystOkay. Then cash component of the proceeds, I guess, you got the $100 million from the direct sale and $165 million in the -- from the seed capital sale in U.S. dollars is not a huge amount, but would it be safe to assume that's going to be directed towards deleveraging?
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. Yes. That's -- I mean, obviously, it's [indiscernible] but certainly, deleveraging continues to be a priority. And then beyond that investments.
Gabriel Dechaine
analystAnd I don't know if you answered it in the prior question, but the sub-advisory of that $25 billion, are there any cost savings because you'll be paying a sub-advisory fee presumably, but maybe some internal changes are possible to?
Paul Mahon
executiveNo. I would say broadly, it's sort of a breakeven. Really, what we're doing is we're just looking for the benefits of diversification. We're looking for the benefits of some of their alternative strengths, some of their global capabilities that we actually don't have in place. So it's really looking for things that are complementary in the same way that we've been able to leverage complementary capabilities with Sagard and with Northleaf. We really look for this to be complementary to the strength that Raman has on his team. Anything else you'd add, Ram -- Raman?
Raman Srivastava
executiveI think that's right. Thanks, you did well.
Gabriel Dechaine
analystOkay. How long have you been working on this deal? I know -- I mean I have certainly asked the question over the years and others have, whether you buy something or sell something? Maybe you can give me a sense of when the decision was made to ultimately go to the sale route, and how long have you been negotiating with Ben Franklin there specifically? And were there other -- other points in time, had you -- had you engaged in discussions with other potential partners?
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. So thanks for the question. I'll go with your last question first, which was, yes, we have, over the years, looked at a number of opportunities. But as I said before, it's always been about strong fit as well as sort of the financial part of it. This particular transaction, I'm not going to tell you when we got into discussions, but obviously, we worked with them. We wanted to understand, in particular, there's the economic side of it, but we also want to understand the potential of this partnership and the potential fit. So we worked hard to understand their capabilities and ultimately, we came to a decision and concluded on this last night.
Gabriel Dechaine
analystOkay. Well, I know you won't give me a specific time line there, but is it months, years? How long you've been talking to these...
Paul Mahon
executiveWell, these things don't happen in weeks. I'll tell you that. It's always going to be a number of months. And like all transactions, it takes a lot of hard work and time and to really come to terms but also come to a decision. So we're really pleased with our decision.
Gabriel Dechaine
analystAll right. And I echo the congrats statement earlier.
Paul Mahon
executiveThank you very much, Gabe.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Nigel D'Souza of Veritas Investment Research.
Nigel D'Souza
analystI have a couple of questions for you. First, just a point of clarification on the income and appreciation related to Franklin Templeton stock, is that going to be included in base earnings? Or were you referring to accretion on our reported EPS basis.
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes, that -- the dividends and a modest depreciation, that will be included in base earnings.
Nigel D'Souza
analystOkay. And any clarity under the DOE framework, is that surplus income net investment income? Or how is that reported there?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. I think we'll get into the specifics later on. It will be within the U.S. segment in terms of likely going to be surplus income. That would be my quick off the top.
Nigel D'Souza
analystOkay. And then switching gears to kind of the profitability of Putnam. When I look at Franklin Templeton expectations, we also expect EPS accretion on their side. And they see Putnam hitting a 30% operating margin after -- 1 year after closing. So when I look at Putnam's core margin historically, the last 3 years, I think your high watermark was around 20%. So what they -- is there a structural kind of challenge with the economics [ if you're putting Putnam ] where it's difficult for you to achieve that 30%? Or what prevented you from achieving a 30% warehouse Franklin expects to achieve it?
Paul Mahon
executiveGood question. Ultimately, it's scale. It comes down to scale. Putnam has had strong performance, they've added a great track record in terms of for their clients. But the challenge has been scale. And we've talked about that in the past. Putnam has -- their core margin has moved around a bit. It's been a little bit lower than the last year, obviously, but it's probably been low double digits sort of where it was at for a period of time there for -- in the 2021 period. And this really -- the scaling of this really unlocks it. When you really think about it, is lift and shift the Putnam assets and capabilities into a scale business like Franklin Templeton. And it unlocks a lot of value we could say from the standpoint of scale. And then we also believe it unlocks a lot of value -- potential value for Franklin because of the capabilities that Putnam brings to the transaction.
Nigel D'Souza
analystOkay. That makes sense. And last question for me. I know you didn't outline contingent consideration targets, but Franklin Templeton, I think outlined the 30%-plus revenue increase relative to the current annual run rate. So for Putnam, so just, do you have a sense of how realistic do you think that is or how achievable it is to kind of get to that maximum consideration statement?
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. Let me turn that one to Garry. Garry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. So yes, I think Franklin noted the 30%, and I think that was off a revenue base that they're quoting around 500. And so they're referring to the target in the very -- like the accumulated targets and goals of the partnership 5, 7 years out. So -- but we would see a path to that. We think that's quite achievable. We're certainly very excited about the opportunities that the partnership brings. So yes, that's -- but that is -- when they were quoting that number, that was at the outer years of the partnership. And with the ramping up, I see no issues getting there. But obviously, we have to deliver that.
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. And our expectation is post close, we're going to have our teams working together very effectively. It's all about our platform teams, whether it's our wealth or our retirement and other teams working with them to identify where there's opportunity and that our team's understanding where their strengths are, and we see significant opportunity.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Mario Mendonca of TD Securities.
Mario Mendonca
analystThis might be best for Garry. There are a few number questions. I think you offered that the impact on book value for Great-West Life would be, I think you described it as modest. Can you talk about what the carrying value of Putnam is including goodwill, excluding goodwill that you might still have on Putnam because that would help me understand why the impact on book value would be modest. That's my first question.
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. So I would have put the carrying value just -- I'm going to use broad terms, and I would exclude the -- I'm trying to do an apples-to-apples and exclude the tax benefits from both sides. You're probably looking at something just over $1.7 billion, is that sort of $1.7 billion to $1.8 billion range...
Mario Mendonca
analystAnd is that U.S., Garry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveAnd that's why it would equate to the consideration of the value we're retaining is about the same.
Mario Mendonca
analystRight. And that was the U.S. dollar number you gave us, right?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes, U.S. dollars.
Mario Mendonca
analystAnd so I could assume then, and I've kind of lost track, I mean, the deal was -- the original deal was announced in February 2007. So presumably between then and now, there have been some goodwill and other write-downs that have taken that carrying value down. Is that right?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. That was in 2008, we had -- we'd recorded an impairment of I think it was $1.8 billion pretax, $1.3 billion post tax in early 2008 with the financial crisis beyond -- sorry, early in the financial crisis in 2008. So that was probably the big -- the big drop in terms of impact. And then since it's been more steady.
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. And the starting point was a -- we value Putnam -- anyway, Garry has covered it.
Mario Mendonca
analystYes, that makes sense. The other thing I want to quickly address is you made the point that you thought this deal would be modestly accretive. And I can certainly do the math on Franklin Templeton's dividends and what they're going to -- what your proportionate interest in that to be. But what are you thinking about when you take into consideration the loss that Putnam was generating pretty much regularly. Like are you -- you're obviously taking that into account as well, that loss goes away. Maybe the question I'm asking is, what lost quarterly were you contemplating and offering the outlook that the earnings accretion will be modest?
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. Actually, to try and keep this straight up, we're positioning more as Putnam being a breakeven. So we're doing the accretion relative to what we sense broadly speaking, would be in the consensus and we're estimating that to be around breakeven on their core net income. And so that's -- the accretion is measured from that.
Mario Mendonca
analystI see. So if I have -- if I believe that there was going to be an ongoing loss, then presumably, there would be better accretion on that basis. That's helpful. I think I get it. And then finally, did you talk about what the implications for the leverage ratio would be on this sale?
Paul Mahon
executiveGarry?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveNo, we didn't cover those, but I would not expect it to be material.
Mario Mendonca
analystNo material change. And then again, I'll stop here. These are just some detailed questions I want to get cleared up. In the case of Putnam and how it was reported in the U.S. drivers of earnings, can I -- is it fair to say that, that was all captured, both the revenue expenses were captured in the asset and wealth management fee income line in the drivers of earnings?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. In the drivers of earnings, you'll see we would have had on the asset -- for the asset management side. But the only thing I'd mention there is that PanAgora within -- with Putnam. So we'll have to think about how we separate that out as we come to our Q2 reporting.
Mario Mendonca
analystRight. But there was no unallocated expenses, like non -- sorry, non-directly attributable expenses related to Putnam. It was all in that asset and wealth management line. Is that right?
Garry MacNicholas
executiveYes. It's all in there, yes.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Joo Ho Kim of Credit Suisse.
Joo Ho Kim
analystJust a couple of quick ones. The strategic partnership with Franklin and the $25 billion in the AUM allocated, I'm wondering is there a ceiling for that? And how many years, I guess, supposedly can this AUM allocated increase for?
Paul Mahon
executiveThere's -- I wouldn't characterize a ceiling. What we've done is we've been working with interacting with Franklin to understand where the opportunities are. And we had a clear sighting on this initial $25 billion allocation. And we're confident that by leveraging their capabilities, it's going to help us with our asset management solutions backing our various product platforms. And then ultimately, if you think about the partnership going forward, we're looking to augment those allocations. And we've done quite a bit of work to try and understand where their strengths are, where the complementary nature of their offerings are both from a product and a regional perspective. And we see opportunity for significant growth beyond that. So there's really no ceiling. We see an opportunity. Our expectation over time is that will grow significantly as we grow our actual business. As you know, we've been growing significantly when you consider the growth in Putnam -- pardon me, Empower AUA, we've been seeing solid growth in Canada as well in Europe. So the reality is we see this as a growth play.
Joo Ho Kim
analystGot it. And what was the -- just switching gears, what was the rationale for keeping the PanAgora business separately? I guess I'm just trying to understand how this fits into Great-West on a stand-alone -- as a stand-alone business and what the plan is sort of and whether we could see the company take any further actions on this business specifically?
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. Well, I'll start off by saying that we actually quite like the PanAgora business. It is a quantitative asset manager. It tends to flourish when markets are performing in a positive direction. Generally, it could be a little bit more challenged when there's market dislocation. That's the nature of quantitative management. But it is a very strong manager with a strong reputation, strong client base, and we like it. The reality is it didn't fit with what Franklin Templeton's interest were, and frankly, it fits quite nicely with our interest. We look at the diversification of our asset management, whether it be the stakes we've gotten some alternative players, whether we look at ILIM in Ireland, Setanta, and we like PanAgora as a hold because it's a good business that we think has real upside to it.
Operator
operatorOur next question comes from Darko Mihelic of RBC Capital Markets.
Darko Mihelic
analystI just have 2 questions. The first one, I just want to take back to the ownership position is a very explicit lockup for the 4.9% just 180 days for the other portion, but you mentioned you might actually hang on to it, depending upon some considerations. And in my mind, when I think of things like this, I think of further cementing this partnership would be a Board seat. Is that something that you're contemplating with respect to this partnership? Or was that contemplated? And why not have a Board seat?
Paul Mahon
executiveIt is not something we're contemplating. This is really -- we're going to work this partnership from the standpoint of strong cooperation with our organization, understanding their capabilities, their organization, understanding our opportunities. And so we really think that, that is the best way to drive that partnership forward. And frankly, a lot of that will happen on the ground with their investment management team, our platform teams working together. And from the -- we're going to have a joint steering committee of executives that are going to oversee that, but there will be a lot of on-the-ground activity. And from the standpoint of the holding, we think the actual holding of the 4.9%, it really aligns with our common interest in growing this partnership. So we like that. From the standpoint of the access holding over the 4.9%, we'll cross that bridge when the time comes. But as we said, at this stage, we think there's real upside in their stock. So we'll cross that bridge at that time.
Darko Mihelic
analystOkay. And my follow-up question is slightly different. It pertains to the essentially farming out the general account to Franklin Templeton to manage, there seems to be an indication there that there was also some interest in their alternative assets and that perhaps in the future, there will be more allocated. So a 2-part question. The first is, is this sort of indicating that you are, as a firm, potentially looking at alternative assets is becoming a bigger proportion of your general account? And I guess, secondarily to that, how do you manage the unique aspect of the general account with Franklin Templeton in the sense that there will be a lot of actuarial work required and a lot of back and forth? So I'm just curious how that's going to happen. Because it does seem to me like a $25 billion plus, you may be one of the fewer insurers out there that has more of your general account managed sort of outside, so to speak?
Paul Mahon
executiveYes. Well, to start, I'll let Raman put context around the $25 billion because it's actually a very small part of the overall general account. As you know, our U.S. general account has grown quite dramatically through the acquisitions of the MassMutual and the Prudential retirement book. So we have a very large U.S. general account. We also have a large Canadian and European general account. So this is a small part of the general account. As it relates to the alternatives, I'll let Raman maybe speak to the general account opportunity. But as we look to alternative assets, we see it both as part of a general account diversified portfolio. But also, we see the democratization of alternative assets that's starting to emerge more and more on wealth platforms. And when you think about our wealth platforms, whether that's wealth platforms at Irish Life, the wealth platforms that we've got at Canada Life, wealth platforms that are sister company Investors Group -- Investors Group has, the wealth platform that we're building across the Empower platform. We actually do think alternatives are going to feature more prominently within structured solutions. So when we look to Franklin and when we look to Sagard and when we look to Northleaf, all of those entities participating is something that we see as a real opportunity. The other approach we could take, obviously, would be to kind of go out to the general market and try and get access to alternative solutions. But what this does is this gets us working closer with these providers so that we can actually structure solutions that make sense in the context of both those wealth management platforms and our general account. Maybe, Raman, you can provide a little bit of context around the scale of the $25 billion relative to our general account overall.
Raman Srivastava
executiveYes, sure, Paul. So just -- maybe just to further elaborate on Paul's comments there. Our overall general account is roughly CAD 225 billion. So this is a relatively small portion of the general account that we're contemplating here. We fully expect to maintain our general account capabilities, and we expect that there'll be some complementary benefits from having Franklin manage a small portion of it. In terms of your other question on AUM or reporting or actuarial considerations, we don't see any of that changing. We'll be able to -- and we'll work to oversee the assets the same way we have as if they were managed internally with respect to AUM considerations, with respect to reporting considerations. Maybe last comment I'll make just on your question around alternatives. I think Paul spoke to it well in terms of the future growth beyond the general account in our various channels. Within the general accounts, you may recall, we have roughly 7% in equities and that's predominantly public equities. So we do think there is a strategic imperative for us to diversify some of that exposure. As Paul mentioned, we've been doing it with some strategic partners already, Northleaf and Sagard. And we think there'll be further scope to do that in the future with Franklin as well.
Darko Mihelic
analystOkay. But I did -- I thought the general account -- so you're essentially allocating a global amount from the general account? Or are we specifically suggesting that the general account that's being allocated, the $25 billion, I thought it was purely coming from the U.S. general account. Am I correct in that thinking which is about $100 billion?
Raman Srivastava
executiveWell, so the final details, we're still working out as we get close to close, but you're right, it will principally be from the U.S. general account.
Darko Mihelic
analystAnd in the future, will other general account assets be contemplated in allocating to Franklin Templeton?
Paul Mahon
executiveI can't -- we can't really speak to the future. I would say if there was a complementary capability that we thought was going to provide for better client outcomes and better shareholder outcomes, we would consider it. But that's the frame we'll always take. It will always be about better client outcomes, better shareholder outcomes.
Operator
operatorThis concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Mahon for any closing remarks.
Paul Mahon
executiveThank you very much, Ariel. I'd like to thank everyone who is able to join us on the call today. We really appreciate you joining on short notice. I'll just reiterate that we're really excited about this transaction. We're pleased for the Putnam organization in terms of its ability to thrive under new ownership. And ultimately, we look forward to working with Franklin Templeton on a partnership that we think really is going to create value for our clients, create value for teams and also create value for shareholders. As I mentioned previously, we've -- we're planning an Investor Day for June 20, and we'll be getting some information out on that, and we hope you'll be able to join us. Thank you very much.
Operator
operatorThis concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.
Read the full transcript via the API
You're viewing the first half of this call. Get the complete Great-West Lifeco Inc. transcript — plus 255,000+ transcripts from 12,000+ companies, speaker segments, AI summaries and full-text search — through the EarningsCalls.dev API.
Get the API View API docs →For developers and AI pipelines
Programmatic access to Great-West Lifeco Inc. earnings transcripts and 255,000+ others is available through the
EarningsCalls.dev REST API. Plans from $24.99/month — full transcripts, speaker segments,
full-text search, and the recently-added /api/v1/transcripts/recent polling endpoint for ETL pipelines.